FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Basic Parameters Building Vertical Loading Summary Building Horizontal Loading Summary

No. of Average Typical Gross Building Building Building Building Building Material Building Vertical Load Floor Pressure Lateral Average Ratio Building Storeys Storey Storey Area Pressure Wind Shear Moment Project Name Floor Building Stability Type Load Wind Height, H Speed Usage Type Pressure f1.4|1.0 . NS H/N S h Column Floor ΣΣΣA FDL FSDL FLL FSLS FDL /ΣΣΣAFSDL /ΣΣΣAFLL /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFDN ΣΣΣV ΣΣΣM ΣΣΣV/F SLS

m 4.00 m ST/RC/CM ST/RC/PT m2 MN MN MN MN kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa WL/EQ m/s kPa MN MNm %

Residential Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, Saudi 728.0 171 4.26 4.00 / Hotel / N/A RC Type C Core/Shear Walls 243,866 7,029 488 854 8,370 28.8 2.0 3.5 34.3 2,250 WL 42.2 No Data 104.0 43,000 1.7% Arabia Office

4.80/4.00 Office / , Dubai, United Arab Core/Shear Walls 659.0 171 3.85 3.50/3.20 Residential RC RC Type C+D 280,000 7,920 560 980 9,460 28.3 2.0 3.5 33.8 2,800 WL No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Emirates and Outriggers 3.20/3.90 / Hotel

Hotel / Mega Frame Tube Type , Shanghai, China 614.0 125 4.91 4.40 Office / CM ST (Belt Trusses), Core 380,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL No Data 2.7 139.7 42,900 No Data C+D+E Retail Wall and Outriggers

Mega Frame Tube Office / Type KL118 (Merdeka PNB118) 521.2 123 4.24 4.24 RC ST (Belt Trusses), Core 292,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL No Data 1.7 60.0 19,000 No Data Hotel C+D+E Wall and Outriggers

Core Wall, 3.60 Office / Jamsil , Seoul, Type Outriggers and Mega 510.9 129 3.96 3.90 Hotel / RC ST/RC 330,000 10,803 660 1,155 12,618 32.7 2.0 3.5 38.2 2,434 WL 30.0 2.8 91.5 27,500 1.0% South Korea C+D+E Frame Tube (Belt 4.50 Retail Trusses)

Sears (Willis) Tower, Chicago, Illinois, Tube (Internal Webs 454.8 113 4.02 3.92 Office ST ST Type E 408,922 2,037 329 1,431 3,798 5.0 0.8 3.5 9.3 807 WL 34.0 1.3 40.8 9,282 1.5% USA and Belt Trusses)

World Trade Center Towers 1 | 2, 431.8 115 3.75 3.75 Office ST ST Type E Tube 460,404 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data New York, USA

Mega Frame Tube Type , Taipei, Taipei 405.8 94 4.32 4.20 Office CM ST (Belt Trusses), Core 187,110 2,019 734 842 3,595 10.8 3.9 4.5 19.2 892 WL 67.0 3.0 59.0 11,971 2.3% C+D+E Wall and Outriggers

Petronas Towers 1 | 2, Kuala Type Tube, Core Wall and 403.8 93 4.34 4.00 Office RC ST 213,750 2,008 442 855 3,304 9.4 2.1 4.0 15.5 1,130 WL 35.1 1.3 22.8 4,600 1.0% Lumpur, C+D+E Outriggers

Bank of the Southwest Tower, Office / 387.8 86 4.51 3.96 CM ST Type B Braced Frames 204,400 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 47.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Houston, Texas, USA Retail

Residential Guiyang World Trade Center, 380.0 74 5.14 5.00 / Hotel / RC ST Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 194,315 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Guiyang, China Office

Empire State Building, New York, Moment Frames and 376.8 103 3.66 3.66 Office ST ST Type A+B 208,879 1,047 418 731 2,196 5.0 2.0 3.5 10.5 919 WL No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data USA Braced Frames

Amoco Building (), 361.3 87 4.15 3.86 Office ST ST Type E Tube 285,093 1,306 225 1,140 2,671 4.6 0.8 4.0 9.4 816 WL No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Chicago, Illinois, USA

2.82 Residential , Chicago, 351.6 102 3.45 3.81 / Office / ST ST Type E Braced Tube 261,000 1,154 203 914 2,271 4.4 0.8 3.5 8.7 588 WL 34.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Illinois, USA 3.81 Car Park

Central Plaza, Hong Kong 324.8 81 4.01 3.60 Office RC RC Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 181,548 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 64.0 3.8 59.2 9,621 No Data

Tube (Internal Webs Allied Bank Plaza (Wells Fargo Plaza), Type and Belt Trusses), 312.0 75 4.16 4.00 Office ST ST 186,000 792 155 651 1,598 4.3 0.8 3.5 8.6 694 WL No Data 3.1 61.2 9,540 5.4% Houston, Texas, USA C+D+E Core Wall and Outriggers

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 1 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Stability Element Dimensions

Outrigger Tube / Braced Tube / Mega Frame Tube / Braced Building Stiffness Building Dynamics Moment Frame Braced Frame Core / Shear Wall Building Building (or Transfer Outrigger) Mega Frame Tube (Internal Webs / Belt Trusses) Project Name Slender Height, H Ratio, Lateral Torsional Ratio, Ratio, Add. Damping, Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Column Column Beam Slender Ratio Displ., δδδ Accn., a Depth H/ δδδ Period, T Period, T t H/T T/N S Dampers ζζζSLS Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Spacing Depth Depth Ratio

m mm s s 40 0.11 mg m 4.5 m 16.5 m 15.4 m m 7.6 m m mm mm 6.2 6.8

Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, Saudi 728.0 No Data No Data 12.0 6.0 61 0.07 None No Data 10.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 90.0 8.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.1 Arabia

Burj Khalifa, Dubai, United Arab 659.0 No Data No Data 11.3 4.3 58 0.07 None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 80.0 8.2 80.0 6.4 8.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.2 Emirates

1270 tonne Shanghai Tower, Shanghai, China 614.0 No Data No Data 9.0 No Data 68 0.07 0.036 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 30.0 20.5 70.0 8.8 8.8 70.0 18.33 3,700 8,800 8.8 8.8 (0.43%F DL

+SDL ) TMD

KL118 (Merdeka PNB118) 521.2 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 25.5 20.4 47.5 No Data 11.0 47.5 No Data No Data No Data 11.0 11.0

Jamsil Lotte World Tower, Seoul, 510.9 732 698 9.3 No Data 55 0.07 None No Data 9.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 38.0 13.4 68.5 19.5 7.5 62.0 27.11 2,000 14,400 8.2 7.5 South Korea

Sears (Willis) Tower, Chicago, Illinois, 454.8 827 550 7.8 3.3 58 0.07 None 0.013 20.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 68.6 4.57 990 1,070 6.6 6.6 USA

World Trade Center Towers 1 | 2, 431.8 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 63.0 1.00 No Data No Data 6.9 6.9 New York, USA

660 tonne

Taipei 101, Taipei, Taipei 405.8 2,029 200 7.0 No Data 58 0.07 (0.24%F DL No Data 5.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 22.5 18.0 61.6 4.2 6.6 61.6 22.50 2,400 4,200 6.6 6.6

+SDL ) TMD

Petronas Towers 1 | 2, Kuala 403.8 No Data No Data 9.0 7.2 45 0.10 None 0.020 20.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 22.8 17.7 45.0 8.0 9.0 45.0 8.84 2,400 1,150 9.0 9.0 Lumpur, Malaysia

Bank of the Southwest Tower, 386 tonne 387.8 1,167 332 7.0 7.0 55 0.08 0.035 22.0 N/A N/A 48.7 8.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.0 Houston, Texas, USA TMD

Guiyang World Trade Center, 380.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 24.0 15.8 N/A N/A N/A 55.0 4.50 No Data No Data 6.9 6.9 Guiyang, China

Empire State Building, New York, 376.8 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data USA

Amoco Building (Aon Center), 361.3 903 400 No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 57.2 3.05 No Data No Data 6.3 6.3 Chicago, Illinois, USA

John Hancock Center, Chicago, 351.6 703 500 No Data No Data No Data No Data None 0.010 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 48.8 13.20 965 No Data 7.2 7.2 Illinois, USA

Central Plaza, Hong Kong 324.8 400 812 No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data 10.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 16.0 20.3 N/A N/A N/A 48.0 4.57 No Data 1,100 6.8 6.8

Allied Bank Plaza (Wells Fargo Plaza), 312.0 624 500 No Data No Data No Data No Data None 0.010 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 13.5 23.1 36.0 No Data 8.7 36.0 4.57 1,016 No Data 8.7 8.7 Houston, Texas, USA

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 2 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Vertical Element Dimensions Base Vertical Element ULS Stress and Grade Building Structural Material Quantity Summary

Column Wall Base Column ULS Stress Base Wall ULS Stress Building Steel Quantity and Concrete Volume Project Name Rebar Quantity and Tonnage Tendon Quantity and Tonnage Height, H Tonnage and Equiv. Floor Thk Thicknes ULS Axial ST Axial RC Axial RC Axial Min Dim Max Dim ST Area ST Mass RC Area ST Grade ST Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio s Load Stress Stress Stress 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 m /10 m 3 2 3 2 m mm mm cm kg/m cm mm MN N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % tonnes kg/m m 2 tonnes kg/m kg/m tonnes kg/m kg/m

Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, Saudi 728.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,200 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 35 100 35% 0 0.0 292,864 1,201 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Arabia

Burj Khalifa, Dubai, United Arab 659.0 600 3,500 N/A N/A 21,000 1,300 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 80 No Data No Data 80 No Data 0 0.0 330,000 1,179 55,000 167 196.4 0 0 0.0 Emirates

Shanghai Tower, Shanghai, China 614.0 3,700 5,300 No Data No Data 196,100 1,200 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 234,250 616 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

KL118 (Merdeka PNB118) 521.2 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Jamsil Lotte World Tower, Seoul, 510.9 3,500 3,500 N/A N/A 122,500 2,000 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 95 No Data No Data 95 No Data No Data No Data 450,119 1,364 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 South Korea

Sears (Willis) Tower, Chicago, Illinois, 454.8 610 990 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 69,000 168.7 56,673 139 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 USA

World Trade Center Towers 1 | 2, 431.8 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 57,551 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 New York, USA

Taipei 101, Taipei, Taipei 405.8 2,400 3,000 7,364 5,781 64,636 N/A 380 236 410 58% 32 85 38% N/A N/A N/A 107,000 571.9 40,408 216 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Petronas Towers 1 | 2, Kuala 403.8 C 2,400 N/A N/A 45,239 750 163 N/A N/A N/A 36 80 45% 16 80 20% 8,250 38.6 80,278 376 12,000 149 56.1 0 0 0.0 Lumpur, Malaysia

Bank of the Southwest Tower, 387.8 2,900 6,000 No Data No Data 174,000 N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data No Data 70 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 55,944 274 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Houston, Texas, USA

Guiyang World Trade Center, 380.0 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Guiyang, China

Empire State Building, New York, 376.8 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 42,820 205.0 26,110 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 USA

Amoco Building (Aon Center), 361.3 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 250 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 45,900 161.0 35,637 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Chicago, Illinois, USA

John Hancock Center, Chicago, 351.6 965 965 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 250 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 37,845 145.0 32,625 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Illinois, USA

Central Plaza, Hong Kong 324.8 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data 1,300 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 60 No Data No Data 60 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Allied Bank Plaza (Wells Fargo Plaza), 312.0 610 1,016 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23,808 128.0 23,250 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Houston, Texas, USA

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 3 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Conceptual Scheme

Building Vertical Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Horizontal Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Project Name Height, H Regular Floors Transfer Floor Regular Floors

m

Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, Saudi CF-GF-L167 office/hotel/residential: 2-way RC slab 728.0 None B2-L167: RC (buttressed) core/shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Arabia B2-B1 car park: 2-way RC slab

L112-L135, L139-167 office/plant: 2-way RC slab Burj Khalifa, Dubai, United Arab B2-L167: RC (buttressed) core/shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC outriggers at L17-L18, L40-L42, L73-L75, L109-L111, L141-L143 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) 659.0 L43-L72, L76-L108 residential: 2-way RC slab None Emirates (100%) B2-B1, CF-GF-L39 car park/lobby/hotel: 2-way RC slab

L84-L120 hotel: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams LXX mega frame tube B5-L120: ST/CM mega frame tube (with ST belt trusses at L6-L7, L20-L21, L35-L36, L50-L51, L66-L67, L82-L83, L99-L100, L116-L117) resists ΣV and ΣM, RC core wall Shanghai Tower, Shanghai, China 614.0 L1-L83 retail/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams transfers: ST belt trusses resists ΣV and ΣM and ST outriggers at L6-L7, L20-L21, L35-L36, L50-L51, L66-L67, L82-L83, L99-L100, L116-L117 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B5-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams transfer ΣF Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

LXX mega frame tube B5-L117: ST/RC mega frame tube (with ST belt trusses at LXX) resists ΣV and ΣM, RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST outriggers at LXX resist ΣM (as push-pull axial GF-L117 hotel/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams KL118 (Merdeka PNB118) 521.2 transfers: ST belt trusses force) (100%) B5-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams transfer ΣF Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L104-L123 office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams L75-L123: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) L72-L75 mega frame Jamsil Lotte World Tower, Seoul, L72-L103 hotel: flat RC slab B6-L75: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (70%), ST outriggers at L39-L43, L72-L75 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (15%) and ST/RC mega frame tube (with ST belt 510.9 tube transfer: ST belt South Korea L14-L71 office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams trusses at L72-L75) resists ΣV and ΣM (15%) trusses transfer ΣF B6-B1, L1-L13 car park/retail: 1-way RC slab with RC beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Sears (Willis) Tower, Chicago, Illinois, GF-L109 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B3-L109: ST tube (with ST internal webs and ST belt trusses at L29-L31, L64-L66, L88-L90) resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) 454.8 None USA B3-B1 retail: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

World Trade Center Towers 1 | 2, GF-L109 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B5-L109: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) 431.8 None New York, USA B5-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

LXX mega frame tube B5-L89: ST/CM mega frame tube (with ST belt trusses at L26, L34, L42, L50, L58, L66, L74, L82) resists ΣV and ΣM, ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST L1-L89 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Taipei 101, Taipei, Taipei 405.8 transfers: ST belt trusses outriggers at L7-L8, L17-L18, L25-L26, L34, L42, L50, L58, L66, L74, L82, L90 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B5-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams transfer ΣF Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Petronas Towers 1 | 2, Kuala GF-L87 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B5-L87: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM (50%), RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (40%) and RC outriggers at L36-L37 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (10%) 403.8 None Lumpur, Malaysia B5-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Bank of the Southwest Tower, GF-L81 lobby/retail/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B4-L81: ST/CM braced frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 387.8 None Houston, Texas, USA B4-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L67-L73 residential: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Guiyang World Trade Center, 380.0 L50-L66 hotel: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams None GF-L73: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM and RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Guiyang, China GF-L49 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

Empire State Building, New York, GF-L101 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 376.8 None B1-L101: ST moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM and ST braced frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) USA B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

Amoco Building (Aon Center), GF-L81 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B5-L81: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) 361.3 None Chicago, Illinois, USA B5-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L46-L99 residential: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams John Hancock Center, Chicago, 351.6 L11-L45 office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams None B2-L99: ST braced tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Illinois, USA B2-L10 retail/car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

L4-L77 office: 1-way RC slab with RC beams L3-L77: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM (90%) and RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (10%) L3 transfer: RC transfer Central Plaza, Hong Kong 324.8 GF-L2 lobby: 1-way RC slab with RC beams B2-L3: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) beams transfer ΣF R1 B3-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams B3-B2: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣMR1 and RC retaining walls resist ΣV and ΣMR2 (100%)

B4-L70: ST tube (with ST internal webs and ST belt trusses at LXX(s)) resists ΣV and ΣM, ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST outriggers at LXX(s) resist ΣM Allied Bank Plaza (Wells Fargo Plaza), GF-L70 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 312.0 None (as push-pull axial force) (100%) Houston, Texas, USA B4-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 4 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Project Name Height, H Transfer Floor

m

Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, Saudi 728.0 None Arabia

Burj Khalifa, Dubai, United Arab 659.0 None Emirates

LXX mega frame tube transfers: ST Shanghai Tower, Shanghai, China 614.0 belt trusses transfer ΣV and ΣM

LXX mega frame tube transfers: ST KL118 (Merdeka PNB118) 521.2 belt trusses transfer ΣV and ΣM

Jamsil Lotte World Tower, Seoul, L72-L75 mega frame tube transfer: 510.9 South Korea ST belt trusses transfer ΣV and ΣM

Sears (Willis) Tower, Chicago, Illinois, 454.8 None USA

World Trade Center Towers 1 | 2, 431.8 None New York, USA

LXX mega frame tube transfers: ST Taipei 101, Taipei, Taipei 405.8 belt trusses transfer ΣV and ΣM

Petronas Towers 1 | 2, Kuala 403.8 None Lumpur, Malaysia

Bank of the Southwest Tower, 387.8 None Houston, Texas, USA

Guiyang World Trade Center, 380.0 None Guiyang, China

Empire State Building, New York, 376.8 None USA

Amoco Building (Aon Center), 361.3 None Chicago, Illinois, USA

John Hancock Center, Chicago, 351.6 None Illinois, USA

L3 transfer: RC transfer beams Central Plaza, Hong Kong 324.8 transfer ΣV and ΣM

Allied Bank Plaza (Wells Fargo Plaza), 312.0 None Houston, Texas, USA

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 5 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Basic Parameters Building Vertical Loading Summary Building Horizontal Loading Summary

No. of Average Typical Gross Building Building Building Building Building Material Building Vertical Load Floor Pressure Lateral Average Ratio Building Storeys Storey Storey Area Pressure Wind Shear Moment Project Name Floor Building Stability Type Load Wind Height, H Speed Usage Type Pressure f1.4|1.0 . NS H/N S h Column Floor ΣΣΣA FDL FSDL FLL FSLS FDL /ΣΣΣAFSDL /ΣΣΣAFLL /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFDN ΣΣΣV ΣΣΣM ΣΣΣV/F SLS

m 4.00 m ST/RC/CM ST/RC/PT m2 MN MN MN MN kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa WL/EQ m/s kPa MN MNm %

Residential / Hotel / Core Wall and MahaNakhon Tower, Thailand 303.2 74 4.10 4.15 RC RC/PT Type C+D 121,782 1,600 460 350 2,410 13.1 3.8 2.9 19.8 No Data WL 25.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Car Park / Outriggers Retail

Two Prudential Plaza, Chicago, Core Wall and 295.1 69 4.28 3.96 Office RC RC Type C+D 130,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 31.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Illinois, USA Outriggers

Mega Frame Tube One Liberty Place, Philadelphia, Type 291.8 62 4.71 3.81 Office ST ST (Belt Trusses), Core 120,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 31.0 1.6 22.1 3,225 No Data Pennsylvania, USA C+D+E Wall and Outriggers

AT&T Corporate Center (The Franklin 278.0 63 4.41 4.00 Office RC ST Type E Tube 157,934 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 35.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data - North Tower), Chicago, Illinois, USA

Mellon Bank, Philadelphia, 274.2 59 4.65 3.80 Office CM ST Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 117,706 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 36.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Pennsylvania, USA

Osaka World Trade Center, Osaka, Moment Frames and 264.0 58 4.55 4.00 Office ST ST Type A 150,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 40.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Japan Braced Frames

Nations Bank Corporate Center (Bank Office / of America Corporate Center), 263.7 64 4.12 3.86 RC RC/PT Type E Tube 130,063 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 35.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Retail Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Core/Shear Walls Pavilion Damansara Heights RC, 262.1 65 4.03 3.50 Residential RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 85,894 1,111 601 299 2,011 12.9 7.0 3.5 23.4 1,387 WL 33.5 1.3 17.8 2,535 1.2% Damansara, , Malaysia Outrigger

Bank One Center (Comerica Bank Office / 255.4 64 3.99 3.84 CM ST Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 148,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 31.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Tower), Dallas, Texas, USA Car Park

Singapore Treasury Building (8 255.3 57 4.48 4.25 Office N/A ST Type C Core Wall 106,711 928 92 300 1,320 8.7 0.9 2.8 12.4 1,641 WL 38.0 1.0 12.5 1,600 1.3% Shenton Way), Singapore

Core/Shear Walls 2.85-3.05 Residential CitySpire, New York, USA 255.0 77 3.31 RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 77,100 792 154 196 1,142 10.3 2.0 2.5 14.8 797 WL 47.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data 3.50 / Office Outriggers

Pavilion Damansara Heights RT1 | Core/Shear Walls RT2 | RT3, Damansara, Kuala 253.4 69 3.67 3.50 Residential RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 99,295 1,252 483 263 1,998 12.6 4.9 2.6 20.1 1,332 WL 33.5 1.3 26.5 3,800 1.9% Lumpur, Malaysia Outrigger

Rialto Building, Melbourne, Australia 250.8 65 3.86 3.90 Office RC RC Type C+E Tube and Core Walls 107,122 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 39.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data

Georgia Pacific, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 237.8 54 4.40 3.90 Office ST ST Type E Tube 96,620 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 42.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data

Core Wall and Citibank Plaza, Hong Kong 235.6 45 5.24 3.90 Office RC RC Type C+D 153,828 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 64.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Outriggers

Core/Shear Walls BBCC Lucentia SA1, Bukit Bintang, 235.3 63 3.73 3.50 Residential RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 57,457 707 237 162 1,106 12.3 4.1 2.8 19.2 1,229 WL 33.5 1.4 11.8 1,560 1.5% Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Outrigger

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 6 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Stability Element Dimensions

Outrigger Tube / Braced Tube / Mega Frame Tube / Braced Building Stiffness Building Dynamics Moment Frame Braced Frame Core / Shear Wall Building Building (or Transfer Outrigger) Mega Frame Tube (Internal Webs / Belt Trusses) Project Name Slender Height, H Ratio, Lateral Torsional Ratio, Ratio, Add. Damping, Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Column Column Beam Slender Ratio Displ., δδδ Accn., a Depth H/ δδδ Period, T Period, T t H/T T/N S Dampers ζζζSLS Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Spacing Depth Depth Ratio

m mm s s 40 0.11 mg m 4.5 m 16.5 m 15.4 m m 7.6 m m mm mm 6.2 6.8

MahaNakhon Tower, Thailand 303.2 606 500 7.1 2.2 43 0.10 None 0.010 15.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 23.0 13.2 35.6 8.3 8.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.5

Two Prudential Plaza, Chicago, 295.1 488 605 7.2 4.4 41 0.10 None 0.020 19.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 13.8 21.4 38.2 5.0 7.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.7 Illinois, USA

One Liberty Place, Philadelphia, 291.8 648 450 5.5 No Data 53 0.09 None 0.020 15.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 21.3 13.7 48.1 15.2 6.1 48.1 21.35 No Data 3,810 6.1 6.1 Pennsylvania, USA

AT&T Corporate Center (The Franklin 278.0 397 700 6.5 No Data 43 0.10 None 0.015 20.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 40.0 4.57 1,422 No Data 7.0 7.0 - North Tower), Chicago, Illinois, USA

Mellon Bank, Philadelphia, 274.2 548 500 6.0 No Data 46 0.10 None 0.015 20.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 23.2 11.8 N/A N/A N/A 50.0 2.95 750 No Data 5.5 5.5 Pennsylvania, USA

Osaka World Trade Center, Osaka, 264.0 1,300 203 5.8 No Data 46 0.10 None 0.020 No Data 36.0 7.3 No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.3 Japan

Nations Bank Corporate Center (Bank of America Corporate Center), 263.7 377 700 5.3 No Data 50 0.08 None 0.015 12.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 45.1 6.10 1,370 No Data 5.9 5.9 Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Pavilion Damansara Heights RC, 262.1 300 874 6.7 6.7 39 0.10 None 0.015 3.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.0 43.7 23.4 2.5 11.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11.2 Damansara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Bank One Center (Comerica Bank 255.4 511 500 6.8 3.5 38 0.11 None 0.020 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 7.60 610 No Data No Data No Data Tower), Dallas, Texas, USA

Singapore Treasury Building (8 255.3 No Data No Data 5.6 No Data 46 0.10 None 0.020 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 24.0 10.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.6 Shenton Way), Singapore

CitySpire, New York, USA 255.0 510 500 5.5 2.0 46 0.07 None 0.015 15.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 24.4 10.5 24.4 No Data 10.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.5

Pavilion Damansara Heights RT1 | RT2 | RT3, Damansara, Kuala 253.4 310 817 6.8 6.9 38 0.10 None 0.015 5.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.5 29.8 18.0 3.5 14.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14.1 Lumpur, Malaysia

Rialto Building, Melbourne, Australia 250.8 230 1,090 6.1 No Data 41 0.09 None 0.030 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 11.0 22.8 N/A N/A N/A 35.0 5.00 1,200 500 7.2 7.2

Georgia Pacific, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 237.8 533 446 6.2 No Data 38 0.11 None 0.010 20.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 37.3 3.05 465 No Data 6.4 6.4

Citibank Plaza, Hong Kong 235.6 370 637 No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.5 24.8 30.0 No Data 7.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.9

BBCC Lucentia SA1, Bukit Bintang, 235.3 231 1,019 6.5 5.7 36 0.10 None 0.010 17.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.5 24.8 25.0 2.0 9.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.4 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 7 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Vertical Element Dimensions Base Vertical Element ULS Stress and Grade Building Structural Material Quantity Summary

Column Wall Base Column ULS Stress Base Wall ULS Stress Building Steel Quantity and Concrete Volume Project Name Rebar Quantity and Tonnage Tendon Quantity and Tonnage Height, H Tonnage and Equiv. Floor Thk Thicknes ULS Axial ST Axial RC Axial RC Axial Min Dim Max Dim ST Area ST Mass RC Area ST Grade ST Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio s Load Stress Stress Stress 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 m /10 m 3 2 3 2 m mm mm cm kg/m cm mm MN N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % tonnes kg/m m 2 tonnes kg/m kg/m tonnes kg/m kg/m

MahaNakhon Tower, Thailand 303.2 1,800 1,800 N/A N/A 32,400 1,100 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 60 No Data No Data 60 No Data 0 0.0 66,668 547 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data

Two Prudential Plaza, Chicago, 295.1 890 1,140 N/A N/A 10,146 840 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 84 No Data No Data 84 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Illinois, USA

One Liberty Place, Philadelphia, 291.8 No Data No Data 3,552 2,788 N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 15,000 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Pennsylvania, USA

AT&T Corporate Center (The Franklin 278.0 813 1,422 N/A N/A 11,561 N/A No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 56 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 35,811 227 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 - North Tower), Chicago, Illinois, USA

Mellon Bank, Philadelphia, 274.2 600 750 810 636 4,500 600 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 41 No Data No Data No Data 21,129 180 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Pennsylvania, USA

Osaka World Trade Center, Osaka, 264.0 650 850 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 490 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 22,500 150 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Japan

Nations Bank Corporate Center (Bank of America Corporate Center), 263.7 C 1,370 N/A N/A 14,741 N/A No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 55 No Data N/A N/A N/A 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Pavilion Damansara Heights RC, 262.1 1,900 1,900 N/A N/A 36,100 600 120 N/A N/A N/A 33 60 55% 25 60 42% 0 0.0 46,294 539 5,450 118 63.5 91 2 1.1 Damansara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Bank One Center (Comerica Bank 255.4 610 610 2,040 1,601 2,601 N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Tower), Dallas, Texas, USA

Singapore Treasury Building (8 255.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,650 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data 40 No Data No Data No Data 35,598 334 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Shenton Way), Singapore

CitySpire, New York, USA 255.0 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 56 No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0.0 33,000 428 4,300 130 55.8 0 0 0.0

Pavilion Damansara Heights RT1 | RT2 | RT3, Damansara, Kuala 253.4 1,500 2,750 N/A N/A 41,250 600 100 N/A N/A N/A 24 60 40% 20 60 33% 0 0.0 52,173 525 7,155 137 72.1 0 0 0.0 Lumpur, Malaysia

Rialto Building, Melbourne, Australia 250.8 C 1,200 N/A N/A 11,310 750 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 60 No Data No Data 60 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Georgia Pacific, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 237.8 421 465 753 591 N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 12,078 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Citibank Plaza, Hong Kong 235.6 1,900 3,000 N/A N/A 57,000 1,200 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 40 No Data No Data 40 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

BBCC Lucentia SA1, Bukit Bintang, 235.3 1,050 2,300 N/A N/A 24,150 500 95 N/A N/A N/A 39 70 56% 20 70 29% 0 0.0 29,445 512 2,925 99 50.9 48 2 0.8 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 8 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Conceptual Scheme

Building Vertical Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Horizontal Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Project Name Height, H Regular Floors Transfer Floor Regular Floors

m

L20-L73 residential: 1-way RC slab with PT beams L8-L18 hotel: 1-way RC slab with PT beams B1-L73: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and RC outriggers at L19-L20, L35-L36, L51-L52 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) MahaNakhon Tower, Thailand 303.2 None L1-L7 retail/car park: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints. B1 retail: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams

Two Prudential Plaza, Chicago, GF-L63 lobby/office: 1-way RC slab with RC beams B5-L63: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and RC outriggers at L40, L59 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) 295.1 None Illinois, USA B5-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L6, L21, L37 mega One Liberty Place, Philadelphia, GF-L60 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B1-L60: ST mega frame tube (with ST belt trusses at L6, L21, L37) resists ΣV and ΣM, ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST outriggers at L20-L23, L37-L40, 291.8 frame tube transfers: ST Pennsylvania, USA B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams L51-L54 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) belt trusses transfer ΣF

L16, L29, L44 transfers: AT&T Corporate Center (The Franklin GF-L60 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 278.0 RC transfer beams B2-L60: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) - North Tower), Chicago, Illinois, USA B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams transfer ΣF

L7-L54 office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams L6-L54: ST/CM tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Mellon Bank, Philadelphia, L6 transfer: ST transfer 274.2 GF-L5 lobby: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B4-L6: ST/CM (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Pennsylvania, USA trusses transfer ΣF R1 B4-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Osaka World Trade Center, Osaka, L1-L55 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B3-L55: ST moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM and ST braced frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 264.0 None Japan B3-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Nations Bank Corporate Center (Bank LXX setback transfers: GF-L61 retail/office: 1-way RC slab with PT beams of America Corporate Center), 263.7 PT transfer beams B2-L61: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B2-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with PT beams Charlotte, North Carolina, USA transfer ΣF

L50-L51 M&E & facility: 1/2-way RC slab Pavilion Damansara Heights RC, L8-L49 residential: 1/2-way RC slab L7 transfer: PT transfer L7-L51: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 262.1 Damansara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia LG, GF, L1, L2, L3, L3M, L3A, L3AM, L5, L5M, L6 M&E: 2-way RC slab with PT beams plate transfers ΣF B8-L7: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣMR1 and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B8-B1 car park: 2-way RC slab with PT beams

L50-L51 transfer: ST L50-L59: ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Bank One Center (Comerica Bank GF-L59 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 255.4 transfer vierendeels B4-L50: ST/CM tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Tower), Dallas, Texas, USA B4-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams transfer ΣF Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Singapore Treasury Building (8 GF-L51 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B5-L51: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) 255.3 None Shenton Way), Singapore B5-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L26-L74 residential: flat RC slab LXX setback transfers: LXX-L74: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) CitySpire, New York, USA 255.0 GF-L25 lobby/office: flat RC slab RC transfer shear walls B2-LXX: RC core/shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B2-B1 car park: flat RC slab transfer ΣF R1

L56-L57 M&E & facility: 1/2-way RC slab Pavilion Damansara Heights RT1 | L6-L55 residential: 1/2-way RC slab L5 transfer: RC transfer L5-L57: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) RT2 | RT3, Damansara, Kuala 253.4 LG, GF, L1, L2, L3, L3M, L3A car park: flat RC slab plate transfers ΣF B8-L5: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) Lumpur, Malaysia R1 B8-B1 car park: flat RC slab

GF-L62 lobby/office: 1-way RC slab with RC beams Rialto Building, Melbourne, Australia 250.8 None B2-L62: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM and RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) B2-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams

GF-L51 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Georgia Pacific, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 237.8 None B2-L51: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

GF-L40 lobby/office: 1-way RC slab with RC beams B4-L40: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and RC outriggers at LXX, LXX resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) Citibank Plaza, Hong Kong 235.6 None B4-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L5-L48 residential: 1/2-way RC slab BBCC Lucentia SA1, Bukit Bintang, L3M, L3A, L3AM facility: flat RC slab L4 transfer: PT transfer L4-L48: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 235.3 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia LG2, LG1, LG, GF, MZ, L1, L1M, L2, L2M, L3 car park: flat RC slab plate transfers ΣF B4-L4: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣMR1 and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B4-B1 car park: flat RC slab

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 9 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Project Name Height, H Transfer Floor

m

MahaNakhon Tower, Thailand 303.2 None

Two Prudential Plaza, Chicago, 295.1 None Illinois, USA

L6, L21, L37 mega frame tube One Liberty Place, Philadelphia, 291.8 transfers: ST belt trusses transfer ΣV Pennsylvania, USA and ΣM

AT&T Corporate Center (The Franklin L16, L29, L44 transfers: RC transfer 278.0 - North Tower), Chicago, Illinois, USA beams transfer ΣV and ΣM

Mellon Bank, Philadelphia, L6 transfer: ST transfer trusses 274.2 Pennsylvania, USA transfer ΣV and ΣM

Osaka World Trade Center, Osaka, 264.0 None Japan

Nations Bank Corporate Center (Bank LXX setback transfers: PT transfer of America Corporate Center), 263.7 beams transfer ΣV and ΣM Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

L7 transfer: PT transfer outrigger Pavilion Damansara Heights RC, 262.1 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Damansara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia pull axial force)

Bank One Center (Comerica Bank L50-L51 transfer: ST transfer 255.4 Tower), Dallas, Texas, USA vierendeels transfer ΣV and ΣM

Singapore Treasury Building (8 255.3 None Shenton Way), Singapore

LXX setback transfers: RC transfer CitySpire, New York, USA 255.0 outrigger shear walls transfer ΣV and ΣM (as push-pull axial force)

Pavilion Damansara Heights RT1 | L5 transfer: RC transfer outrigger RT2 | RT3, Damansara, Kuala 253.4 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Lumpur, Malaysia pull axial force)

Rialto Building, Melbourne, Australia 250.8 None

Georgia Pacific, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 237.8 None

Citibank Plaza, Hong Kong 235.6 None

L4 transfer: PT transfer outrigger BBCC Lucentia SA1, Bukit Bintang, 235.3 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia pull axial force)

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 10 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Basic Parameters Building Vertical Loading Summary Building Horizontal Loading Summary

No. of Average Typical Gross Building Building Building Building Building Material Building Vertical Load Floor Pressure Lateral Average Ratio Building Storeys Storey Storey Area Pressure Wind Shear Moment Project Name Floor Building Stability Type Load Wind Height, H Speed Usage Type Pressure f1.4|1.0 . NS H/N S h Column Floor ΣΣΣA FDL FSDL FLL FSLS FDL /ΣΣΣAFSDL /ΣΣΣAFLL /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFDN ΣΣΣV ΣΣΣM ΣΣΣV/F SLS

m 4.00 m ST/RC/CM ST/RC/PT m2 MN MN MN MN kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa WL/EQ m/s kPa MN MNm %

Carnegie Hall Tower, New York, USA 234.4 63 3.72 3.66 Office RC RC Type E Tube (Internal Web) 48,773 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 47.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data

Figueroa at Wilshire, Los Angeles, Core Wall and 234.3 57 4.11 3.96 Office ST ST Type C+D 96,295 393 91 337 821 4.1 0.9 3.5 8.5 393 WL 31.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data California, USA Outriggers

Bourke Place, Melbourne, Australia 234.1 57 4.11 3.70 Office RC RC/PT Type C+E Core Wall and Tube 62,407 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 39.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data

Office / Core Wall and Chifley Tower, Sydney, Australia 231.3 54 4.28 4.08 ST ST Type C+D 90,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 50.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Retail Outriggers

Core/Shear Walls 2.95 Residential Metropolitan Tower, New York, USA 224.9 70 3.21 RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 60,600 552 121 148 822 9.1 2.0 2.5 13.6 675 WL 47.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data 3.45 / Office Outrigger

First International Building (Renaissance Tower), Dallas, Texas, 224.6 58 3.87 3.81 Office ST ST Type E Braced Tube 176,500 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 31.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data USA

Melbourne Central, Melbourne, Office / 222.6 57 3.90 3.85 CM ST Type C+E Core Wall and Tube 120,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 50.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Australia Retail

Hotel / ACT Tower, Hamamatsu City, Japan 219.9 49 4.49 4.00 Office / ST ST Type B Braced Frames No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 30.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Retail

Office / Hopewell Centre, Hong Kong 219.4 65 3.37 3.35 RC RC Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 100,355 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Car Park

Four Allen Center (1400 Smith Type Tube, Core Wall and 218.4 52 4.20 3.96 Office ST ST 133,800 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 41.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Street), Houston, Texas, USA C+D+E Outriggers

One Shell Plaza, Houston, Texas, USA 217.6 50 4.35 4.35 Office RC RC Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 113,924 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data

2.90 Residential Core/Shear Walls, Trump Tower, New York, USA 213.0 61 3.49 3.66 / Office / RC RC Type C+D Outriggers and No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL No Data 1.3 No Data No Data No Data 4.80 Retail Transfer Outrigger

77 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, 211.5 52 4.07 3.96 Office ST ST Type C Core Wall 96,600 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Illinois, USA

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, 211.0 51 4.14 3.96 Office ST ST Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 102,200 692 92 358 1,142 6.8 0.9 3.5 11.2 479 WL 43.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Illinois, USA

1999 Broadway, Denver, Colorado, Core Wall and 209.4 46 4.55 3.81 Office ST ST Type C+D 59,061 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 36.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data USA Outriggers

Sunway Belfield Residences T1 | T2, Core/Shear Walls Jalan Belfield, Kuala Lumpur, 205.9 57 3.61 3.20 Residential RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 71,742 771 359 201 1,331 10.7 5.0 2.8 18.5 931 WL 33.5 1.0 10.0 1,150 1.1% Malaysia Outrigger

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 11 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Stability Element Dimensions

Outrigger Tube / Braced Tube / Mega Frame Tube / Braced Building Stiffness Building Dynamics Moment Frame Braced Frame Core / Shear Wall Building Building (or Transfer Outrigger) Mega Frame Tube (Internal Webs / Belt Trusses) Project Name Slender Height, H Ratio, Lateral Torsional Ratio, Ratio, Add. Damping, Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Column Column Beam Slender Ratio Displ., δδδ Accn., a Depth H/ δδδ Period, T Period, T t H/T T/N S Dampers ζζζSLS Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Spacing Depth Depth Ratio

m mm s s 40 0.11 mg m 4.5 m 16.5 m 15.4 m m 7.6 m m mm mm 6.2 6.8

Carnegie Hall Tower, New York, USA 234.4 469 500 4.8 2.0 49 0.08 None 0.010 20.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22.9 3.56 480 762 10.3 10.3

Figueroa at Wilshire, Los Angeles, 234.3 380 617 6.5 No Data 36 0.11 None 0.010 17.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 17.4 13.5 45.7 0.9 5.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.1 California, USA

Bourke Place, Melbourne, Australia 234.1 200 1,171 4.8 No Data 49 0.08 None 0.010 3.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A 20.0 11.7 N/A N/A N/A 40.0 8.10 1,100 900 5.9 5.9

400 tonne Chifley Tower, Sydney, Australia 231.3 578 400 5.0 No Data 46 0.09 0.025 20.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 21.0 11.0 50.0 8.2 4.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.6 TMD

Metropolitan Tower, New York, USA 224.9 450 500 5.0 2.0 45 0.07 None 0.013 15.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 21.3 10.6 21.3 4.0 10.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.6

First International Building (Renaissance Tower), Dallas, Texas, 224.6 449 500 No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 53.3 7.62 533 No Data 4.2 4.2 USA

Melbourne Central, Melbourne, 222.6 100 2,226 4.2 No Data 53 0.07 None 0.010 2.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A 20.4 10.9 N/A N/A N/A 43.7 6.00 1,200 900 5.1 5.1 Australia

ACT Tower, Hamamatsu City, Japan 219.9 1,100 200 4.7 No Data 46 0.10 None 0.010 52.0 N/A N/A 9.4 23.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23.4

Hopewell Centre, Hong Kong 219.4 150 1,462 No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data 16.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 18.8 11.7 N/A N/A N/A 45.8 3.00 1,220 1,670 4.8 4.8

Four Allen Center (1400 Smith 218.4 546 400 4.0 No Data 54 0.08 None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.8 27.8 32.1 0.9 6.8 31.1 4.57 915 No Data 7.0 6.8 Street), Houston, Texas, USA

One Shell Plaza, Houston, Texas, USA 217.6 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 17.0 12.8 N/A N/A N/A 40.2 1.83 No Data No Data 5.4 5.4

Trump Tower, New York, USA 213.0 355 600 5.2 No Data 41 0.09 None 0.015 16.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data 7.3 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data

77 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, 211.5 423 500 6.7 6.7 32 0.13 None 0.020 29.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 15.6 13.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13.6 Illinois, USA

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, 211.0 400 527 8.3 6.3 25 0.16 None 0.015 18.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 19.0 11.1 N/A N/A N/A 48.8 6.10 498 No Data 4.3 4.3 Illinois, USA

1999 Broadway, Denver, Colorado, 209.4 524 400 No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data 7.6 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data USA

Sunway Belfield Residences T1 | T2, Jalan Belfield, Kuala Lumpur, 205.9 215 958 7.5 6.9 28 0.13 None 0.005 17.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.0 22.9 27.0 2.2 7.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.6 Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 12 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Vertical Element Dimensions Base Vertical Element ULS Stress and Grade Building Structural Material Quantity Summary

Column Wall Base Column ULS Stress Base Wall ULS Stress Building Steel Quantity and Concrete Volume Project Name Rebar Quantity and Tonnage Tendon Quantity and Tonnage Height, H Tonnage and Equiv. Floor Thk Thicknes ULS Axial ST Axial RC Axial RC Axial Min Dim Max Dim ST Area ST Mass RC Area ST Grade ST Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio s Load Stress Stress Stress 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 m /10 m 3 2 3 2 m mm mm cm kg/m cm mm MN N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % tonnes kg/m m 2 tonnes kg/m kg/m tonnes kg/m kg/m

Carnegie Hall Tower, New York, USA 234.4 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 58 No Data No Data 58 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Figueroa at Wilshire, Los Angeles, 234.3 1,067 1,067 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,592 110.0 12,037 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 California, USA

Bourke Place, Melbourne, Australia 234.1 1,100 1,100 N/A N/A 12,100 400 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 60 No Data No Data 60 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data

Chifley Tower, Sydney, Australia 231.3 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 11,250 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Metropolitan Tower, New York, USA 224.9 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 58 No Data No Data 58 No Data 0 0.0 23,000 380 3,300 143 54.5 0 0 0.0

First International Building (Renaissance Tower), Dallas, Texas, 224.6 533 584 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 22,063 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 USA

Melbourne Central, Melbourne, 222.6 1,000 1,200 No Data No Data 12,000 600 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 60 No Data No Data 65 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Australia

ACT Tower, Hamamatsu City, Japan 219.9 600 750 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Hopewell Centre, Hong Kong 219.4 1,220 1,450 N/A N/A 17,690 762 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 40 No Data No Data 40 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Four Allen Center (1400 Smith 218.4 280 915 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 250 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 16,725 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Street), Houston, Texas, USA

One Shell Plaza, Houston, Texas, USA 217.6 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Trump Tower, New York, USA 213.0 813 813 N/A N/A 6,610 457 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 49 No Data No Data 49 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

77 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, 211.5 454 569 1,385 1,087 N/A 559 No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 52 No Data No Data No Data 22,196 230 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Illinois, USA

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, 211.0 432 498 946 743 N/A 660 No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 62 No Data 6,030 59.0 26,355 258 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Illinois, USA

1999 Broadway, Denver, Colorado, 209.4 454 569 1,385 1,087 N/A 610 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 42 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 USA

Sunway Belfield Residences T1 | T2, Jalan Belfield, Kuala Lumpur, 205.9 800 4,000 N/A N/A 32,000 500 120 N/A N/A N/A 38 65 58% 25 65 38% 0 0.0 32,109 448 3,103 97 43.3 90 3 1.3 Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 13 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Conceptual Scheme

Building Vertical Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Horizontal Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Project Name Height, H Regular Floors Transfer Floor Regular Floors

m

L43++ transfer: RC GF-L61 lobby/office: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams Carnegie Hall Tower, New York, USA 234.4 transfer vierendeels B1-L61: RC tube (with RC internal web) resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B1 car park: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams transfer ΣF

Figueroa at Wilshire, Los Angeles, GF-L52 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B4-L52: ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST outriggers at B4-L52 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) 234.3 None California, USA B4-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

GF-L53 lobby/office: 1-way RC slab with PT beams B3-L53: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (92.5%) and RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM (7.5%) Bourke Place, Melbourne, Australia 234.1 None B3-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with PT beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L2-L49 office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B4-L49: ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST outriggers at L5, L29-L30, L42 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) Chifley Tower, Sydney, Australia 231.3 GF-L1 retail: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams None Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints. B4-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

L19-L67 residential: flat RC slab L18 transfer: RC transfer L18-L67: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Metropolitan Tower, New York, USA 224.9 GF-L17 lobby/office: flat RC slab beams transfer ΣF B2-L18: RC core/shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B2-B1 car park: flat RC slab R1

First International Building GF-L55 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams (Renaissance Tower), Dallas, Texas, 224.6 None B2-L55: ST braced tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams USA

Melbourne Central, Melbourne, GF-L53 retail/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B3-L53: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (90%) and RC/CM tube resists ΣV and ΣM (10%) 222.6 None Australia B3-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L29-L47 hotel: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams ACT Tower, Hamamatsu City, Japan 219.9 L1-L28 retail/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams None B2-L47: ST braced frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

GF-L63 lobby/car park/office: 1-way RC slab with RC beams Hopewell Centre, Hong Kong 219.4 None B1-L63: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM and RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams

Four Allen Center (1400 Smith GF-L49 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 218.4 None B2-L49: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM, ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST outriggers at B2-L49 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) Street), Houston, Texas, USA B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

One Shell Plaza, Houston, Texas, USA 217.6 GF-L49 lobby/office: 1-way RC slab with RC beams None GF-L49: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM and RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%)

L19-L57: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and RC outriggers at L57 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) L20-L57 residential: flat RC slab L19 transfer: RC transfer B3-L19: RC core/shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM , RC outriggers at L57 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) Trump Tower, New York, USA 213.0 GF-L18 retail/office: 2-way RC slab with RC beams R1 walls transfer ΣF (100%) B3-B1 car park: 2-way RC slab with RC beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

77 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, GF-L49 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 211.5 None B2-L49: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Illinois, USA B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

LXX setback transfers: 181 West Madison Street, Chicago, GF-L49 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 211.0 ST transfer beams B1-L49: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM and RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Illinois, USA B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams transfer ΣF

1999 Broadway, Denver, Colorado, GF-L42 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B3-L42: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST outriggers at L3-L4 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) 209.4 None USA B3-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Sunway Belfield Residences T1 | T2, L10-L53 residential: 1/2-way RC slab L9 transfer: PT transfer L9-L53: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Jalan Belfield, Kuala Lumpur, 205.9 P1-P7, L8, L8a car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams plate transfers ΣF B2-L9: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) Malaysia B2-B1 car park: flat RC slab R1

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 14 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Project Name Height, H Transfer Floor

m

L43++ transfer: RC transfer Carnegie Hall Tower, New York, USA 234.4 vierendeels transfer ΣV and ΣM

Figueroa at Wilshire, Los Angeles, 234.3 None California, USA

Bourke Place, Melbourne, Australia 234.1 None

Chifley Tower, Sydney, Australia 231.3 None

L18 transfer: RC transfer outrigger Metropolitan Tower, New York, USA 224.9 beams transfer ΣV and ΣM (as push- pull axial force)

First International Building (Renaissance Tower), Dallas, Texas, 224.6 None USA

Melbourne Central, Melbourne, 222.6 None Australia

ACT Tower, Hamamatsu City, Japan 219.9 None

Hopewell Centre, Hong Kong 219.4 None

Four Allen Center (1400 Smith 218.4 None Street), Houston, Texas, USA

One Shell Plaza, Houston, Texas, USA 217.6 None

L19 transfer: RC transfer outrigger Trump Tower, New York, USA 213.0 walls transfer ΣV and ΣM (as push- pull axial force)

77 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, 211.5 None Illinois, USA

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, LXX setback transfers: ST transfer 211.0 Illinois, USA beams transfer ΣV and ΣM

1999 Broadway, Denver, Colorado, 209.4 None USA

Sunway Belfield Residences T1 | T2, L9 transfer: PT transfer outrigger Jalan Belfield, Kuala Lumpur, 205.9 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Malaysia pull axial force)

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 15 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Basic Parameters Building Vertical Loading Summary Building Horizontal Loading Summary

No. of Average Typical Gross Building Building Building Building Building Material Building Vertical Load Floor Pressure Lateral Average Ratio Building Storeys Storey Storey Area Pressure Wind Shear Moment Project Name Floor Building Stability Type Load Wind Height, H Speed Usage Type Pressure f1.4|1.0 . NS H/N S h Column Floor ΣΣΣA FDL FSDL FLL FSLS FDL /ΣΣΣAFSDL /ΣΣΣAFLL /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFDN ΣΣΣV ΣΣΣM ΣΣΣV/F SLS

m 4.00 m ST/RC/CM ST/RC/PT m2 MN MN MN MN kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa WL/EQ m/s kPa MN MNm %

N6E Building, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Office / Tube (Internal 205.4 50 4.11 3.95 ST ST Type E 183,926 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 35.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Japan Retail Webs)

Telecom (Telstra) Corporate Building, 203.6 50 4.07 3.85 Office RC RC/PT Type C+E Core Wall and Tube 63,158 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 41.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Melbourne, Australia

Core/Shear Walls Sunway Serene T1 | T2, Petaling 194.5 55 3.54 3.10 Residential RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 81,456 806 352 196 1,354 9.9 4.3 2.4 16.6 967 WL 33.5 1.3 15.9 1,890 1.6% Jaya, , Malaysia Outrigger

Dewey Square Tower (One Financial 189.6 48 3.95 3.81 Office ST ST Type E Tube 111,483 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 42.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Center), Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Central Plaza One, Brisbane, Australia 188.6 48 3.93 3.66 Office RC RC/PT Type C+E Core Wall and Tube No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 49.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data

780 Third Avenue, New York, USA 181.0 52 3.48 3.50 Office RC RC Type E Braced Tube 46,500 384 93 163 640 8.3 2.0 3.5 13.8 806 WL No Data 1.3 8.6 778 1.9%

Residential Onterie Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA 176.6 58 3.05 2.62 / Office / RC RC Type E Braced Tube 85,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 34.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Car Park

Morton International (Boeing Office / International Headquarters), Chicago, 173.8 37 4.70 3.81 Retail / Car ST ST Type E Tube 95,792 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 34.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Illinois, USA Park

Casselden Place, Melbourne, Australia 171.3 46 3.72 3.75 Office CM ST Type C Core Wall No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 41.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data

Core Wall, Type 17 State Street, New York, USA 171.0 45 3.80 3.66 Office ST ST Outriggers and 53,360 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 47.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data A+C+D Moment Frames

450 Lexington Avenue, New York, 168.0 40 4.20 3.81 Office ST ST Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 84,634 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 36.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data USA

Core Wall and Waterfront Place, Brisbane, Australia 165.2 42 3.93 3.60 Office RC RC/PT Type C+D No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 49.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Outriggers

Core/Shear Walls Sentral Suites T1 | T2, Brickfields, 162.9 46 3.54 3.40 Residential RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 80,781 782 417 195 1,394 9.7 5.2 2.4 17.3 871 WL 33.5 1.2 17.3 1,610 1.7% Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Outrigger

Core/Shear Walls Sentral Suites T3, Brickfields, Kuala 162.9 46 3.54 3.40 Residential RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 76,991 750 452 180 1,382 9.7 5.9 2.3 18.0 864 WL 33.5 1.2 17.3 1,610 1.8% Lumpur, Malaysia Outrigger

Office / Twin 21, Osaka, Japan 160.8 39 4.12 3.75 CM ST Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 55,056 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 35.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Retail

Riverside Center, Brisbane, Australia 157.0 41 3.83 3.48 Office RC RC/PT Type C+E Core Wall and Tube 50,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 50.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 16 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Stability Element Dimensions

Outrigger Tube / Braced Tube / Mega Frame Tube / Braced Building Stiffness Building Dynamics Moment Frame Braced Frame Core / Shear Wall Building Building (or Transfer Outrigger) Mega Frame Tube (Internal Webs / Belt Trusses) Project Name Slender Height, H Ratio, Lateral Torsional Ratio, Ratio, Add. Damping, Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Column Column Beam Slender Ratio Displ., δδδ Accn., a Depth H/ δδδ Period, T Period, T t H/T T/N S Dampers ζζζSLS Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Spacing Depth Depth Ratio

m mm s s 40 0.11 mg m 4.5 m 16.5 m 15.4 m m 7.6 m m mm mm 6.2 6.8

N6E Building, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 205.4 1,027 200 4.8 No Data 43 0.10 None 0.010 35.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 39.2 3.60 600 No Data 5.2 5.2 Japan

Telecom (Telstra) Corporate Building, 203.6 123 1,655 4.5 No Data 45 0.09 None 0.010 4.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 8.10 No Data 775 No Data No Data Melbourne, Australia

Sunway Serene T1 | T2, Petaling 194.5 210 926 No Data No Data No Data No Data None 0.010 11.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.0 19.5 34.0 2.1 5.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.7 Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Dewey Square Tower (One Financial 189.6 450 421 5.5 No Data 34 0.11 None 0.010 23.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 36.6 4.57 569 1,245 5.2 5.2 Center), Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Central Plaza One, Brisbane, Australia 188.6 350 539 4.4 No Data 43 0.09 None No Data 16.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 16.0 11.8 N/A N/A N/A 36.0 7.00 No Data No Data 5.2 5.2

780 Third Avenue, New York, USA 181.0 180 1,006 4.8 No Data 38 0.09 None 0.010 12.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20.9 2.84 1,220 380 8.7 8.7

Onterie Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA 176.6 353 500 No Data No Data No Data No Data None 0.015 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 26.8 1.68 533 No Data 6.6 6.6

Morton International (Boeing International Headquarters), Chicago, 173.8 330 527 4.0 No Data 43 0.11 None 0.010 15.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data 4.57 No Data No Data No Data No Data Illinois, USA

Casselden Place, Melbourne, Australia 171.3 150 1,142 5.0 No Data 34 0.11 None 0.010 4.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data

17 State Street, New York, USA 171.0 342 500 5.0 No Data 34 0.11 None 0.010 20.0 34.1 5.0 N/A N/A 17.0 10.1 34.1 No Data 5.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.0

450 Lexington Avenue, New York, 168.0 336 500 5.5 No Data 31 0.14 None 0.010 20.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 11.0 15.3 N/A N/A N/A 41.0 6.10 No Data No Data 4.1 4.1 USA

Waterfront Place, Brisbane, Australia 165.2 185 893 5.0 No Data 33 0.12 None 0.010 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.9 15.2 33.9 7.2 4.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.9

Sentral Suites T1 | T2, Brickfields, 162.9 185 881 5.0 5.4 33 0.11 None 0.005 15.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.4 19.4 25.2 2.5 6.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.5 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Sentral Suites T3, Brickfields, Kuala 162.9 185 881 5.0 5.4 33 0.11 None 0.005 15.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.4 19.4 25.2 2.7 6.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.5 Lumpur, Malaysia

Twin 21, Osaka, Japan 160.8 400 402 4.0 No Data 40 0.10 None 0.020 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.7 16.6 N/A N/A N/A 37.1 3.20 No Data No Data 4.3 4.3

Riverside Center, Brisbane, Australia 157.0 63 2,491 3.8 No Data 41 0.09 None 0.020 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 22.0 7.1 N/A N/A N/A 45.0 6.70 1,100 860 3.5 3.5

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 17 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Vertical Element Dimensions Base Vertical Element ULS Stress and Grade Building Structural Material Quantity Summary

Column Wall Base Column ULS Stress Base Wall ULS Stress Building Steel Quantity and Concrete Volume Project Name Rebar Quantity and Tonnage Tendon Quantity and Tonnage Height, H Tonnage and Equiv. Floor Thk Thicknes ULS Axial ST Axial RC Axial RC Axial Min Dim Max Dim ST Area ST Mass RC Area ST Grade ST Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio s Load Stress Stress Stress 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 m /10 m 3 2 3 2 m mm mm cm kg/m cm mm MN N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % tonnes kg/m m 2 tonnes kg/m kg/m tonnes kg/m kg/m

N6E Building, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 205.4 600 600 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 22,991 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Japan

Telecom (Telstra) Corporate Building, 203.6 1,000 1,200 N/A N/A 12,000 500 24 N/A N/A N/A 20 60 33% No Data 60 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Melbourne, Australia

Sunway Serene T1 | T2, Petaling 194.5 C 1,800 N/A N/A 25,447 600 70 N/A N/A N/A 28 50 55% 20 50 40% 0 0.0 33,598 412 3,328 99 40.9 104 3 1.3 Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Dewey Square Tower (One Financial 189.6 454 569 1,385 1,087 N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 13,935 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Center), Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Central Plaza One, Brisbane, Australia 188.6 1,000 1,200 N/A N/A 12,000 600 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 50 No Data No Data 50 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data

780 Third Avenue, New York, USA 181.0 610 1,220 N/A N/A 7,442 No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 41 No Data No Data 41 No Data 0 0.0 16,000 344 2,180 136 46.9 0 0 0.0

Onterie Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA 176.6 483 533 N/A N/A 2,574 N/A No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 52 No Data N/A N/A N/A 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Morton International (Boeing International Headquarters), Chicago, 173.8 No Data No Data 2,089 1,640 N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 11,974 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Illinois, USA

Casselden Place, Melbourne, Australia 171.3 C 950 No Data No Data 7,088 500 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 70 No Data No Data 70 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

17 State Street, New York, USA 171.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 250 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 6,670 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

450 Lexington Avenue, New York, 168.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 10,579 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 USA

Waterfront Place, Brisbane, Australia 165.2 C 1,350 N/A N/A 14,314 600 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 60 No Data No Data 45 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data

Sentral Suites T1 | T2, Brickfields, 162.9 900 2,600 N/A N/A 23,400 500 73 N/A N/A N/A 31 60 52% 20 60 33% 0 0.0 32,573 403 3,372 104 41.7 0 0 0.0 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Sentral Suites T3, Brickfields, Kuala 162.9 900 2,600 N/A N/A 23,400 500 76 N/A N/A N/A 32 60 54% 20 60 33% 0 0.0 31,259 406 3,392 109 44.1 0 0 0.0 Lumpur, Malaysia

Twin 21, Osaka, Japan 160.8 C 1,400 No Data No Data 15,394 900 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 8,258 150 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Riverside Center, Brisbane, Australia 157.0 700 1,100 N/A N/A 7,700 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 50 No Data No Data 40 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 18 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Conceptual Scheme

Building Vertical Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Horizontal Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Project Name Height, H Regular Floors Transfer Floor Regular Floors

m

N6E Building, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, L1-L46 retail/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B4-L46: ST tube (with ST internal webs) resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) 205.4 None Japan B4-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L4-L46 office: 1-way RC slab with PT beams L3-L46: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Telecom (Telstra) Corporate Building, L3 transfer: PT transfer 203.6 GF-L2 lobby: 1-way RC slab with PT beams B3-L3: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Melbourne, Australia beams transfer ΣF R1 B3-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with PT beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Sunway Serene T1 | T2, Petaling L8-L52 residential: 1/2-way RC slab L7 transfer: PT transfer L7-L52: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 194.5 Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia LG, GF, P1-P6 car park: 1-way RC slab with PT beams plate transfers ΣF LG-L7: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣMR1 and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%)

Dewey Square Tower (One Financial GF-L45 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 189.6 None B2-L45: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Center), Boston, Massachusetts, USA B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

GF-L43 lobby/hotel: 1-way PT slab with RC beams B4-L43: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Central Plaza One, Brisbane, Australia 188.6 None B4-B1 car park: 1-way PT slab with RC beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

GF-L49 lobby/office: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams 780 Third Avenue, New York, USA 181.0 None B2-L49: RC braced tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B2-B1 car park: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams

L11-L56 residential: flat RC slab Onterie Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA 176.6 L6-L10 office: flat RC slab None B1-L56: RC braced tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B1-L5 lobby/car park/facility: flat RC slab

Morton International (Boeing L2-L8 transfer: ST L12-L35 office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams International Headquarters), Chicago, 173.8 transfer vierendeels B1-L35: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B1-L11 car park/retail: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Illinois, USA transfer ΣF

GF-L42 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B3-L42: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Casselden Place, Melbourne, Australia 171.3 None B3-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

GF-L43 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 17 State Street, New York, USA 171.0 None B1-L43: ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM, ST outriggers at L43 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) and ST moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

450 Lexington Avenue, New York, GF transfer: ST transfer 168.0 L1-L39 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams GF-L39: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM and ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) USA trusses transfer ΣF

GF-L39 lobby/office: 1-way RC slab with PT beams Waterfront Place, Brisbane, Australia 165.2 None B2-L39: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and RC outriggers at L26-L27 resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B2-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with PT beams

L11-L43 residential: 1/2-way RC slab Sentral Suites T1 | T2, Brickfields, P8 facility: 1-way RC slab with RC beams L10 transfer: RC transfer L10-L43: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 162.9 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia P1-P7 car park: flat RC slab plate transfers ΣF B2-L10: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣMR1 and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B2-B1, GF car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams

P6-P10, L11-L43 residential: 1/2-way RC slab Sentral Suites T3, Brickfields, Kuala P5 transfer: RC transfer P5-L43: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 162.9 P1-P3 car park: flat RC slab Lumpur, Malaysia plate transfers ΣF B2-P5: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B2-B1, GF car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams R1

L6-L38 office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams L5 transfer: CM transfer L5-L38: ST/CM tube resists ΣV and ΣM and ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Twin 21, Osaka, Japan 160.8 L1-L4 retail: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams beams transfer ΣF B1-L5: CM (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams R1

GF-L38 lobby/office: 1-way RC slab with PT beams Riverside Center, Brisbane, Australia 157.0 None B2-L38: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B2-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with PT beams

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 19 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Project Name Height, H Transfer Floor

m

N6E Building, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 205.4 None Japan

Telecom (Telstra) Corporate Building, L3 transfer: PT transfer beams 203.6 Melbourne, Australia transfer ΣV and ΣM

L7 transfer: PT transfer outrigger Sunway Serene T1 | T2, Petaling 194.5 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia pull axial force)

Dewey Square Tower (One Financial 189.6 None Center), Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Central Plaza One, Brisbane, Australia 188.6 None

780 Third Avenue, New York, USA 181.0 None

Onterie Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA 176.6 None

Morton International (Boeing L2-L8 transfer: ST transfer International Headquarters), Chicago, 173.8 vierendeels transfer ΣV and ΣM Illinois, USA

Casselden Place, Melbourne, Australia 171.3 None

17 State Street, New York, USA 171.0 None

450 Lexington Avenue, New York, GF transfer: ST transfer trusses 168.0 USA transfer ΣV and ΣM

Waterfront Place, Brisbane, Australia 165.2 None

L10 transfer: RC transfer outrigger Sentral Suites T1 | T2, Brickfields, 162.9 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia pull axial force)

P5 transfer: RC transfer outrigger Sentral Suites T3, Brickfields, Kuala 162.9 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Lumpur, Malaysia pull axial force)

L5 transfer: CM transfer beams Twin 21, Osaka, Japan 160.8 transfer ΣV and ΣM

Riverside Center, Brisbane, Australia 157.0 None

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 20 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Basic Parameters Building Vertical Loading Summary Building Horizontal Loading Summary

No. of Average Typical Gross Building Building Building Building Building Material Building Vertical Load Floor Pressure Lateral Average Ratio Building Storeys Storey Storey Area Pressure Wind Shear Moment Project Name Floor Building Stability Type Load Wind Height, H Speed Usage Type Pressure f1.4|1.0 . NS H/N S h Column Floor ΣΣΣA FDL FSDL FLL FSLS FDL /ΣΣΣAFSDL /ΣΣΣAFLL /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFDN ΣΣΣV ΣΣΣM ΣΣΣV/F SLS

m 4.00 m ST/RC/CM ST/RC/PT m2 MN MN MN MN kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa WL/EQ m/s kPa MN MNm %

Core/Shear Walls Skyview Block A, Bandar Jelutong, Residential 156.8 44 3.56 3.30 RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 66,365 663 322 155 1,140 10.0 4.9 2.3 17.2 781 WL 33.5 1.7 14.1 1,130 1.7% Island, Malaysia / Car Park Outrigger

Nankai South Tower Hotel, Osaka, Moment Frames and 156.6 39 4.02 3.20 Hotel CM ST Type A+C No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data EQ 35.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Japan Shear Walls

Core/Shear Walls Sunway Avila Towers A | B, Wangsa 154.0 47 3.28 3.20 Residential RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 62,142 633 287 152 1,072 10.2 4.6 2.4 17.2 902 WL 33.5 1.2 16.3 1,350 2.1% Maju, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Outrigger

Core/Shear Walls Eureka Scholar SOHO Towers, Residential 154.0 42 3.67 4.20 RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 130,331 1,022 570 286 1,878 7.8 4.4 2.2 14.4 729 WL 33.5 1.1 23.5 1,980 1.8% Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia / Office Outrigger

Luth Headquarters Building Office / (Bangunan Tabung Haji), Kuala 152.0 38 4.00 3.66 RC RC/PT Type C+E Tube and Core Wall No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 30.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Car Park Lumpur, Malaysia

Core/Shear Walls Embassy Suites Hotel, New York, 149.0 47 3.17 2.65 Hotel ST RC Type C+D and Transfer No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 36.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data USA Outrigger

Core/Shear Walls Eureka Big Data SOHO Towers, Residential 147.0 42 3.50 3.30 RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 70,280 886 408 199 1,493 12.6 5.8 2.8 21.2 1,074 WL 33.5 1.0 23.9 1,860 2.2% Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia / Office Outrigger

Rio Serviced Apartments T1 | T2, Core/Shear Walls Bandar Puteri Puchong, Selangor, 143.9 39 3.69 3.50 Residential RC RC/PT Type C+D and Transfer 35,493 479 175 94 748 13.5 4.9 2.6 21.1 831 WL 33.5 1.2 13.3 1,030 2.5% Malaysia Outrigger

Core/Shear Walls The Terraces, Lebuh Bukit Jambul, Residential 142.0 39 3.64 3.30 RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 80,531 798 526 212 1,536 9.9 6.5 2.6 19.1 763 WL 33.5 1.8 28.2 1,800 2.6% Penang Island, Malaysia / Car Park Outrigger

Hotel de las Artes, Barcelona, Spain 140.0 44 3.18 3.00 Hotel ST ST Type E Braced Tube 59,086 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 40.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data

Office / Tokyo Marine Building, Osaka, Japan 129.7 30 4.32 3.90 Retail / Car ST ST Type A Moment Frames 69,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data EQ 35.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Park

Majestic Building, Wellington, New 127.1 32 3.97 3.70 Office RC RC/PT Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 42,000 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 50.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Zealand

Moment Frames and Kobe Portopia Hotel, Kobe, Japan 118.0 33 3.58 3.02 Hotel CM ST Type A+C 39,314 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data EQ No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Shear Walls

Kobe Commerce and Trade Center, 117.7 28 4.21 3.84 Office ST ST Type C+E Tube and Core Wall 39,487 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data EQ No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Kobe, Japan

Moment Frames, Type Sanwa Bank, Tokyo, Japan 115.1 29 3.97 3.84 Office ST ST Braced Frames and 81,705 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data EQ No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data A+B+C Shear Walls

Kamogawa Grand Tower, Kamogawa, Residential 109.5 34 3.22 2.85 RC RC Type A Moment Frames 40,141 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data WL 35.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data Japan / Hotel

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 21 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Stability Element Dimensions

Outrigger Tube / Braced Tube / Mega Frame Tube / Braced Building Stiffness Building Dynamics Moment Frame Braced Frame Core / Shear Wall Building Building (or Transfer Outrigger) Mega Frame Tube (Internal Webs / Belt Trusses) Project Name Slender Height, H Ratio, Lateral Torsional Ratio, Ratio, Add. Damping, Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Column Column Beam Slender Ratio Displ., δδδ Accn., a Depth H/ δδδ Period, T Period, T t H/T T/N S Dampers ζζζSLS Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Spacing Depth Depth Ratio

m mm s s 40 0.11 mg m 4.5 m 16.5 m 15.4 m m 7.6 m m mm mm 6.2 6.8

Skyview Block A, Bandar Jelutong, 156.8 168 933 5.1 5.5 31 0.12 None 0.005 16.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.5 16.5 30.0 1.8 5.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.2 Penang Island, Malaysia

Nankai South Tower Hotel, Osaka, 156.6 No Data No Data 3.2 No Data 48 0.08 None 0.020 40.0 16.3 9.6 N/A N/A No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.6 Japan

Sunway Avila Towers A | B, Wangsa 154.0 202 762 7.2 6.8 21 0.15 None 0.010 10.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.8 17.5 17.0 1.9 9.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.1 Maju, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Eureka Scholar SOHO Towers, 154.0 194 796 5.0 4.8 30 0.12 None 0.005 8.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 15.5 9.9 15.5 2.0 9.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.9 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Luth Headquarters Building (Bangunan Tabung Haji), Kuala 152.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Lumpur, Malaysia

Embassy Suites Hotel, New York, 149.0 331 450 7.4 No Data 20 0.16 None 0.020 21.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data 14.9 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data USA

Eureka Big Data SOHO Towers, 147.0 323 455 5.7 4.8 26 0.14 None 0.005 10.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.5 15.5 12.6 2.0 11.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11.7 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Rio Serviced Apartments T1 | T2, Bandar Puteri Puchong, Selangor, 143.9 163 883 4.4 3.9 33 0.11 None 0.005 12.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 13.0 11.1 19.0 2.1 7.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.6 Malaysia

The Terraces, Lebuh Bukit Jambul, 142.0 183 776 4.1 4.2 35 0.10 None 0.005 13.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.2 15.4 16.6 2.7 8.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.5 Penang Island, Malaysia

Hotel de las Artes, Barcelona, Spain 140.0 280 500 5.2 No Data 27 0.12 None 0.010 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 35.4 13.80 No Data No Data 4.0 4.0

Tokyo Marine Building, Osaka, Japan 129.7 No Data No Data 4.0 No Data 33 0.13 None 0.020 4.0 21.0 6.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.2

Majestic Building, Wellington, New 127.1 No Data No Data 2.9 No Data 44 0.09 None 0.010 10.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.4 15.1 N/A N/A N/A 33.0 4.50 No Data 950 3.9 3.9 Zealand

Kobe Portopia Hotel, Kobe, Japan 118.0 350 337 3.6 No Data 33 0.11 None 0.020 35.0 19.5 6.1 N/A N/A No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.1

Kobe Commerce and Trade Center, 117.7 294 400 3.4 No Data 34 0.12 None 0.020 40.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 18.0 6.5 N/A N/A N/A 36.9 3.00 700 No Data 3.2 3.2 Kobe, Japan

Sanwa Bank, Tokyo, Japan 115.1 No Data No Data 3.0 No Data 38 0.10 None 0.020 40.0 42.9 2.7 6.3 18.3 No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.7

Kamogawa Grand Tower, Kamogawa, 109.5 No Data No Data 1.9 No Data 57 0.06 None 0.020 No Data 25.5 4.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.3 Japan

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 22 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Vertical Element Dimensions Base Vertical Element ULS Stress and Grade Building Structural Material Quantity Summary

Column Wall Base Column ULS Stress Base Wall ULS Stress Building Steel Quantity and Concrete Volume Project Name Rebar Quantity and Tonnage Tendon Quantity and Tonnage Height, H Tonnage and Equiv. Floor Thk Thicknes ULS Axial ST Axial RC Axial RC Axial Min Dim Max Dim ST Area ST Mass RC Area ST Grade ST Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio s Load Stress Stress Stress 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 m /10 m 3 2 3 2 m mm mm cm kg/m cm mm MN N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % tonnes kg/m m 2 tonnes kg/m kg/m tonnes kg/m kg/m

Skyview Block A, Bandar Jelutong, 156.8 700 2,175 N/A N/A 15,225 600 36 N/A N/A N/A 24 60 40% 15 60 25% 0 0.0 26,184 395 2,985 114 45.0 61 2 0.9 Penang Island, Malaysia

Nankai South Tower Hotel, Osaka, 156.6 1,300 1,300 No Data No Data 16,900 350 No Data No Data 490 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 34 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Japan

Sunway Avila Towers A | B, Wangsa 154.0 1,000 2,300 N/A N/A 23,000 350 69 N/A N/A N/A 30 65 46% 20 60 33% 0 0.0 26,367 424 2,470 94 39.7 77 3 1.2 Maju, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Eureka Scholar SOHO Towers, 154.0 1,300 3,000 N/A N/A 39,000 400 82 N/A N/A N/A 21 60 35% 20 60 33% 0 0.0 42,595 327 4,830 113 37.1 148 3 1.1 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Luth Headquarters Building (Bangunan Tabung Haji), Kuala 152.0 1,200 5,000 N/A N/A 60,000 400 80 N/A N/A N/A 13 32 42% No Data 32 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Lumpur, Malaysia

Embassy Suites Hotel, New York, 149.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A 450 No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 56 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 USA

Eureka Big Data SOHO Towers, 147.0 800 2,400 N/A N/A 19,200 300 76 N/A N/A N/A 40 70 57% 25 70 36% 0 0.0 36,932 525 3,683 100 52.4 110 3 1.6 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Rio Serviced Apartments T1 | T2, Bandar Puteri Puchong, Selangor, 143.9 1,300 1,600 N/A N/A 20,800 375 55 N/A N/A N/A 27 60 44% 20 50 41% 0 0.0 19,968 563 1,795 90 50.6 72 4 2.0 Malaysia

The Terraces, Lebuh Bukit Jambul, 142.0 675 2,350 N/A N/A 15,863 250 36 N/A N/A N/A 23 50 45% 15 50 30% 0 0.0 31,439 390 5,049 161 62.7 0 0 0.0 Penang Island, Malaysia

Hotel de las Artes, Barcelona, Spain 140.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 350 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 7,386 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Tokyo Marine Building, Osaka, Japan 129.7 500 500 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 483 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 8,625 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Majestic Building, Wellington, New 127.1 C 1,400 N/A N/A 15,394 600 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 50 No Data No Data 50 No Data 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Zealand

Kobe Portopia Hotel, Kobe, Japan 118.0 1,100 1,100 No Data No Data 12,100 600 No Data No Data 490 No Data No Data 24 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 4,914 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Kobe Commerce and Trade Center, 117.7 700 700 No Data No Data N/A N/A No Data No Data 490 No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data 5,923 150 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Kobe, Japan

Sanwa Bank, Tokyo, Japan 115.1 400 400 No Data No Data N/A 800 No Data No Data 483 No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 10,213 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0

Kamogawa Grand Tower, Kamogawa, 109.5 900 900 N/A N/A 8,100 N/A No Data N/A N/A N/A No Data 41 No Data N/A N/A N/A 0 0.0 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Japan

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 23 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Conceptual Scheme

Building Vertical Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Horizontal Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Project Name Height, H Regular Floors Transfer Floor Regular Floors

m

L12-L42 residential: 1/2-way RC slab Skyview Block A, Bandar Jelutong, L11 transfer: PT transfer L11-L42: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 156.8 L8-L10 facility: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams Penang Island, Malaysia plate transfers ΣF GF-L11: RC core/shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) GF-L7 lobby/car park: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams R1

L5-L36: ST moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Nankai South Tower Hotel, Osaka, L1-L36 lobby/hotel: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 156.6 None B3-L5: CM moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM and RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Japan B3-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams R1 Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L8-L43 residential: 1/2-way RC slab Sunway Avila Towers A | B, Wangsa L6 facility: 1-way RC slab with RC beams L7 transfer: PT transfer L7-L43: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 154.0 Maju, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia P1-P5 car park: flat PT slab plate transfers ΣF LG4-L7: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣMR1 and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) LG4-LG1 car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams

L3-L28 SOHO: 1/2-way RC slab Eureka Scholar SOHO Towers, LTR transfer: PT transfer LTR-L28: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 154.0 LG2, LG1, GF, LM, L1, L2 car park: flat RC slab Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia plate transfers ΣF B3-LTR: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B3-B1 car park: flat RC slab R1

Luth Headquarters Building L9-L37 office: 1-way RC slab with PT beams L8 transfer: PT transfer L8-L37: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM and RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) (Bangunan Tabung Haji), Kuala 152.0 GF-L7 lobby/car park: 1-way RC slab with PT beams beams transfer ΣF GF-L8: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Lumpur, Malaysia R1

L8-L45 hotel: flat RC slab L5-L7 transfer: ST Embassy Suites Hotel, New York, L7-L45: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 149.0 GF-L4 lobby/hotel: flat RC slab transfer trusses transfer USA B1-L5: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM and ST mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B1 car park: flat RC slab ΣF R1

LM, L1-L31 SOHO: 1/2-way RC slab Eureka Big Data SOHO Towers, LTR transfer: PT transfer LTR-L31: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 147.0 LG2, LG1, GF, GFM car park: flat RC slab Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia plate transfers ΣF B3-LTR: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B3-B1 car park: flat RC slab R1

Rio Serviced Apartments T1 | T2, L2-L37 residential: 1/2-way RC slab L1 transfer: PT transfer L1-L37: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Bandar Puteri Puchong, Selangor, 143.9 GF facility: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams plate transfers ΣF GF-L1: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) Malaysia R1

L6-L34 residential: 1/2-way RC slab The Terraces, Lebuh Bukit Jambul, L5 transfer: RC transfer L5-L34: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 142.0 L4 facility: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams Penang Island, Malaysia beams transfer ΣF B4-L5: RC core/shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) B4-B1, L1-L3 car park: flat RC slab R1

GF-L42 lobby/hotel: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Hotel de las Artes, Barcelona, Spain 140.0 None B1-L42: ST braced tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams

L1-L27 retail/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B3-L27: ST moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Tokyo Marine Building, Osaka, Japan 129.7 None B3-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L2-L28 office: 1-way PT slab with RC beams L1-L28: RC tube resists ΣV and ΣM and RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Majestic Building, Wellington, New L1 transfer: RC transfer 127.1 GF lobby: 1-way PT slab with RC beams B3-L1: RC core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) Zealand beams transfer ΣF R1 B3-B1 car park: 1-way PT slab with RC beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L1-L31 lobby/hotel: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams L5-L31: ST moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Kobe Portopia Hotel, Kobe, Japan 118.0 None B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B2-L5: CM moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM and RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣMR1 (100%)

Kobe Commerce and Trade Center, L1-L26 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams B3-L26: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM and ST (braced) core wall resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) 117.7 None Kobe, Japan B2-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

L3-L25: ST moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM and ST braced frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) L1-L25 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams Sanwa Bank, Tokyo, Japan 115.1 None B4-L3: ST moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM and RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) B4-B1 car park: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams R1 Note that the basement RC retaining walls assumed not to contribute to the lateral stability with the provision of settlement joints.

Kamogawa Grand Tower, Kamogawa, L1-L33 hotel/residential: 2-way RC slab with RC beams 109.5 None B1-L33: RC moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Japan B1 car park: 2-way RC slab with RC beams

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 24 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Project Name Height, H Transfer Floor

m

L11 transfer: PT transfer outrigger Skyview Block A, Bandar Jelutong, 156.8 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Penang Island, Malaysia pull axial force)

Nankai South Tower Hotel, Osaka, 156.6 None Japan

L7 transfer: PT transfer outrigger Sunway Avila Towers A | B, Wangsa 154.0 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Maju, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia pull axial force)

LTR transfer: PT transfer outrigger Eureka Scholar SOHO Towers, 154.0 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia pull axial force)

Luth Headquarters Building L8 transfer: PT transfer beams (Bangunan Tabung Haji), Kuala 152.0 transfer ΣV and ΣM Lumpur, Malaysia

L5-L7 transfer: ST transfer outrigger Embassy Suites Hotel, New York, 149.0 trusses transfer ΣV and ΣM (as push- USA pull axial force)

LTR transfer: PT transfer outrigger Eureka Big Data SOHO Towers, 147.0 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia pull axial force)

Rio Serviced Apartments T1 | T2, L1 transfer: PT transfer outrigger Bandar Puteri Puchong, Selangor, 143.9 plate transfers ΣV and ΣM (as push- Malaysia pull axial force)

L5 transfer: RC transfer outrigger The Terraces, Lebuh Bukit Jambul, 142.0 beams transfer ΣV and ΣM (as push- Penang Island, Malaysia pull axial force)

Hotel de las Artes, Barcelona, Spain 140.0 None

Tokyo Marine Building, Osaka, Japan 129.7 None

Majestic Building, Wellington, New L1 transfer: RC transfer beams 127.1 Zealand transfer ΣV and ΣM

Kobe Portopia Hotel, Kobe, Japan 118.0 None

Kobe Commerce and Trade Center, 117.7 None Kobe, Japan

Sanwa Bank, Tokyo, Japan 115.1 None

Kamogawa Grand Tower, Kamogawa, 109.5 None Japan

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 25 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Basic Parameters Building Vertical Loading Summary Building Horizontal Loading Summary

No. of Average Typical Gross Building Building Building Building Building Material Building Vertical Load Floor Pressure Lateral Average Ratio Building Storeys Storey Storey Area Pressure Wind Shear Moment Project Name Floor Building Stability Type Load Wind Height, H Speed Usage Type Pressure f1.4|1.0 . NS H/N S h Column Floor ΣΣΣA FDL FSDL FLL FSLS FDL /ΣΣΣAFSDL /ΣΣΣAFLL /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFSLS /ΣΣΣAFDN ΣΣΣV ΣΣΣM ΣΣΣV/F SLS

m 4.00 m ST/RC/CM ST/RC/PT m2 MN MN MN MN kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa WL/EQ m/s kPa MN MNm %

Core/Shear Walls Skyview Block B, Bandar Jelutong, Residential 84.6 25 3.38 3.05 RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 24,047 208 83 64 355 8.6 3.5 2.6 14.7 383 WL 33.5 1.8 4.8 210 1.9% Penang Island, Malaysia / Car Park Outrigger

Sumitomo LifeInsurance Building, Tube and Shear 82.3 23 3.58 3.50 Office CM ST Type C+E 13,668 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data EQ No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Okayama, Japan Walls

Core/Shear Walls Duta Suria Block B, Ampang, Kuala Residential 72.1 19 3.79 3.35 RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 51,621 387 181 118 687 7.5 3.5 2.3 13.3 266 WL 33.5 0.9 5.7 200 1.2% Lumpur, Malaysia / Car Park Outrigger

Core/Shear Walls Duta Suria Block A, Ampang, Kuala Residential 71.2 19 3.75 3.35 RC RC Type C+D and Transfer 23,369 218 76 62 356 9.3 3.2 2.7 15.2 305 WL 33.5 0.9 2.5 90 1.0% Lumpur, Malaysia / Car Park Outrigger

XMU Academic Block A3, Ampar 63.0 12 5.25 5.00 Academic RC RC Type A Moment Frames 58,598 571 406 239 1,217 9.7 6.9 4.1 20.8 251 WL 33.5 1.4 7.2 230 0.8% Tenang, Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia

Abbey Mill House, Reading, United Office / 56.4 15 3.76 3.77 ST ST Type C Core Walls 13,600 77 13 62 152 5.7 0.9 4.6 11.2 179 WL 35.6 1.1 3.1 92 2.8% Kingdom Car Park

Office / Gamuda Biz Suites, Shah Alam, Moment Frames and 59.0 13 4.54 4.00 Retail / Car RC RC Type A+C 80,869 753 269 341 1,363 9.3 3.3 4.2 16.9 236 WL 33.5 0.8 4.5 100 0.5% Selangor, Malaysia Core Walls Park

Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Hospital / Moment Frames and 49.1 11 4.46 4.70 RC RC Type A+C 103,717 719 461 652 1,832 6.9 4.4 6.3 17.7 195 WL 33.5 1.2 7.9 200 0.6% Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia Car Park Core Walls

XMU Academic Blocks A1-A2 & A4- A5, Ampar Tenang, Sepang, 41.5 8 5.19 4.50 Academic RC RC Type A Moment Frames 21,854 192 218 110 520 8.8 10.0 5.0 23.8 208 WL 33.5 1.4 3.3 70 0.9% Selangor, Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 26 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Stability Element Dimensions

Outrigger Tube / Braced Tube / Mega Frame Tube / Braced Building Stiffness Building Dynamics Moment Frame Braced Frame Core / Shear Wall Building Building (or Transfer Outrigger) Mega Frame Tube (Internal Webs / Belt Trusses) Project Name Slender Height, H Ratio, Lateral Torsional Ratio, Ratio, Add. Damping, Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Slender Overall Column Column Beam Slender Ratio Displ., δδδ Accn., a Depth H/ δδδ Period, T Period, T t H/T T/N S Dampers ζζζSLS Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Ratio Extent Spacing Depth Depth Ratio

m mm s s 40 0.11 mg m 4.5 m 16.5 m 15.4 m m 7.6 m m mm mm 6.2 6.8

Skyview Block B, Bandar Jelutong, 84.6 73 1,159 3.3 2.8 26 0.13 None 0.005 18.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.2 16.1 24.4 2.0 3.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.5 Penang Island, Malaysia

Sumitomo LifeInsurance Building, 82.3 No Data No Data 2.1 No Data 40 0.09 None 0.020 25.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 25.6 3.2 N/A N/A N/A 25.6 2.50 400 No Data 3.2 3.2 Okayama, Japan

Duta Suria Block B, Ampang, Kuala 72.1 11 6,867 1.7 1.8 43 0.09 None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.7 9.3 28.0 2.3 2.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.6 Lumpur, Malaysia

Duta Suria Block A, Ampang, Kuala 71.2 9 7,911 1.6 1.4 45 0.08 None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.9 24.9 29.6 2.3 2.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.4 Lumpur, Malaysia

XMU Academic Block A3, Ampar 63.0 24 2,625 2.9 2.4 22 0.24 None 0.010 0.9 74.2 0.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.8 Tenang, Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia

Abbey Mill House, Reading, United 56.4 45 1,251 No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.3 6.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.8 Kingdom

Gamuda Biz Suites, Shah Alam, 59.0 7 9,077 No Data No Data No Data No Data None No Data No Data 10.0 5.9 N/A N/A 10.2 5.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.8 Selangor, Malaysia

Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, 49.1 12 4,092 2.4 2.5 21 0.22 None No Data No Data 65.1 0.8 N/A N/A 7.8 6.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.8 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

XMU Academic Blocks A1-A2 & A4- A5, Ampar Tenang, Sepang, 41.5 15 2,862 2.0 1.9 20 0.26 None 0.010 2.1 53.0 0.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.8 Selangor, Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 27 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Base Vertical Element Dimensions Base Vertical Element ULS Stress and Grade Building Structural Material Quantity Summary

Column Wall Base Column ULS Stress Base Wall ULS Stress Building Steel Quantity and Concrete Volume Project Name Rebar Quantity and Tonnage Tendon Quantity and Tonnage Height, H Tonnage and Equiv. Floor Thk Thicknes ULS Axial ST Axial RC Axial RC Axial Min Dim Max Dim ST Area ST Mass RC Area ST Grade ST Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio RC Grade RC Ratio s Load Stress Stress Stress 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 m /10 m 3 2 3 2 m mm mm cm kg/m cm mm MN N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % N/mm N/mm % tonnes kg/m m 2 tonnes kg/m kg/m tonnes kg/m kg/m

Skyview Block B, Bandar Jelutong, 84.6 475 1,075 N/A N/A 5,106 400 11 N/A N/A N/A 22 50 45% 10 50 20% 0 0.0 7,857 327 1,062 135 44.2 0 0 0.0 Penang Island, Malaysia

Sumitomo LifeInsurance Building, 82.3 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 300 No Data No Data 490 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data 1,708 125 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Okayama, Japan

Duta Suria Block B, Ampang, Kuala 72.1 550 925 N/A N/A 5,088 250 7 N/A N/A N/A 14 35 39% 8 35 24% 0 0.0 15,502 300 1,715 111 33.2 0 0 0.0 Lumpur, Malaysia

Duta Suria Block A, Ampang, Kuala 71.2 550 1,000 N/A N/A 5,500 300 7 N/A N/A N/A 12 35 35% 8 35 23% 0 0.0 8,923 382 909 102 38.9 0 0 0.0 Lumpur, Malaysia

XMU Academic Block A3, Ampar 63.0 C 1,250 N/A N/A 12,272 0 26 N/A N/A N/A 22 50 43% No Data No Data No Data 0 0.0 20,903 357 3,278 157 55.9 0 0 0.0 Tenang, Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia

Abbey Mill House, Reading, United 56.4 419 456 574 450 N/A 300 10 169 355 48% N/A N/A N/A 6 40 15% 761 55.9 2,783 205 173 62 12.7 0 0 0.0 Kingdom

Gamuda Biz Suites, Shah Alam, 59.0 590 880 N/A N/A 5,192 800 4 N/A N/A N/A 7 35 21% 2 35 5% 0 0.0 35,676 441 4,115 115 50.9 0 0 0.0 Selangor, Malaysia

Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, 49.1 750 1,100 N/A N/A 8,250 250 12 N/A N/A N/A 14 40 35% 7 40 18% 0 0.0 28,500 275 No Data No Data No Data 0 0 0.0 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

XMU Academic Blocks A1-A2 & A4- A5, Ampar Tenang, Sepang, 41.5 1,000 1,000 N/A N/A 10,000 230 21 N/A N/A N/A 21 50 41% 15 50 29% 0 0.0 7,938 363 1,434 181 65.6 0 0 0.0 Selangor, Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 28 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Conceptual Scheme

Building Vertical Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Horizontal Load Functional Framing Scheme Building Project Name Height, H Regular Floors Transfer Floor Regular Floors

m

L11-L23 residential: 1/2-way RC slab Skyview Block B, Bandar Jelutong, L10 transfer: RC transfer L10-L23: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 84.6 L8-L9 facility: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams Penang Island, Malaysia beams transfer ΣF GF-L10: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) GF-L7 lobby/car park: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams R1

B2-L2 transfer: ST Sumitomo LifeInsurance Building, L3-L21: ST tube resists ΣV and ΣM (100%) 82.3 L3-L21 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams transfer trusses transfer Okayama, Japan B2-L3: CM (braced) shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) ΣF R1

Duta Suria Block B, Ampang, Kuala L5-L17 residential: 1/2-way RC slab L4 transfer: RC transfer L4-L17: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 72.1 Lumpur, Malaysia GF-L3 car park: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams beams transfer ΣF GF-L4: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣMR1 and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%)

L5-L17 residential: 1/2-way RC slab Duta Suria Block A, Ampang, Kuala L4 transfer: RC transfer L4-L17: RC shear walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) 71.2 L1-L3 car park: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams Lumpur, Malaysia beams transfer ΣF GF-L4: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣM (as push-pull axial force) (100%) GF facility: 1/2-way RC slab with RC beams R1

L9 facility: 2-way RC slab with RC beams XMU Academic Block A3, Ampar 63.0 GF-L8 academic: 2-way RC slab with RC beams None B1-L9: RC moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Tenang, Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia B1 car park: 2-way RC slab with RC beams

Abbey Mill House, Reading, United GF-L13 lobby/office: 1-way ST composite slab with ST beams 56.4 None B1-L13: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Kingdom B1 car park: flat RC slab

L4-L9 office: 1-way RC slab with RC beams L3-L9: RC moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM and RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Gamuda Biz Suites, Shah Alam, L3 transfer: RC transfer 59.0 GF-L2 deck/retail: 1-way RC slab with RC beams GF-L3: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM and RC mega columns resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Selangor, Malaysia beams transfer ΣF B2-B1 car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams B2-GF: RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM, RC mega columns resist ΣV and ΣM and RC retaining walls resist ΣV and ΣMR1 (100%)

L4-L10 hospital: 1-way RC slab with RC beams Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, 49.1 L2-L3 car park: 1-way RC slab with RC beams None GF/L1-L10: RC moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM and RC core walls resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia GF/L1 lobby/hospital: 1-way RC slab with RC beams

XMU Academic Blocks A1-A2 & A4- GF-L5 academic: 2-way RC slab with RC beams A5, Ampar Tenang, Sepang, 41.5 None B1-L5: RC moment frames resist ΣV and ΣM (100%) B1 car park: 2-way RC slab with RC beams Selangor, Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 29 of 30 FEM Design Verification Checklist (World Building Structural Summary)

Building Project Name Height, H Transfer Floor

m

L10 transfer: RC transfer outrigger Skyview Block B, Bandar Jelutong, 84.6 beams transfer ΣV and ΣM (as push- Penang Island, Malaysia pull axial force)

Sumitomo LifeInsurance Building, B2-L2 transfer: ST transfer trusses 82.3 Okayama, Japan transfer ΣV and ΣM

L4 transfer: RC transfer outrigger Duta Suria Block B, Ampang, Kuala 72.1 beams transfer ΣV and ΣM (as push- Lumpur, Malaysia pull axial force)

L4 transfer: RC transfer outrigger Duta Suria Block A, Ampang, Kuala 71.2 beams transfer ΣV and ΣM (as push- Lumpur, Malaysia pull axial force)

XMU Academic Block A3, Ampar 63.0 None Tenang, Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia

Abbey Mill House, Reading, United 56.4 None Kingdom

Gamuda Biz Suites, Shah Alam, L3 transfer: RC transfer beams 59.0 Selangor, Malaysia transfer ΣV and ΣM

Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, 49.1 None Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

XMU Academic Blocks A1-A2 & A4- A5, Ampar Tenang, Sepang, 41.5 None Selangor, Malaysia

© MV | 22-02-21 Page 30 of 30