600 108th Avenue, NE, Suite 700 Bellevue, Washington 98004 U.S.A. 1.425.452.800 (p) 1.425.452.1212 (f)

January 26, 2011

Washington State Department of Transportation Submitted via e-mail

RE: Qualifications Statement and Technical Proposal SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Design-Build Construction Management Services Table of Contents Dear Selection Committee: A. Cover Letter B. Executive Summary 3 Removing the Alaskan Way Viaduct (AWV) and replacing it with the C. Team Profile and Experience 6 world’s largest bored tunnel is an epic undertaking. Since 2001, we D. Key Personnel 15 have worked side by side with WSDOT on the AWV Program, and E. Approach to the Work 25 the opportunity to partner with you once again is an exciting one. Appendix To that end, Jacobs has teamed with CH2M HILL and three other SF 330s subconsultants to provide you with an experienced tunnel construction Firm Licenses management team that is ready to support WSDOT in delivering a Submittal Information Forms successful project. Past Performance Evaluations

Our team comprises five firms who know the Viaduct Program, tunnel design and construction, and construction management. The reasons for creating this team were to: provide key personnel that have expe- rience with this type of work in highly developed urban areas; provide the necessary depth, breadth, and avail- ability of resources and capabilities; and support the local economy and engineering industry by maximizing the number of local firms and personnel. The Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team and our roles, are: • Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. – Resident Engineering and Inspection, Construction Management Support Services, Safety Oversight, Project Controls, Contract Management, Administration • CH2M HILL, Inc. – Resident Engineering and Inspection, Monitoring • Babendererde, Inc. – Tunnel and TBM Design Review, Expert Advice on TBMs, Geotechnical Engineering Support and Inspection, Hyperbaric Specialists • Everett Engineers, Inc. – Tunnel Systems Integration and Start-up Planning • UrbanTech Systems (DBE) – Grouting Inspection, Environmental Compliance

The Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team is committed to providing quality service to you and helping you successfully deliver of the SR 99 Bored Tunnel Project. We are confident that our team will provide you with exceptional value and responsiveness. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact our Resident Engineer, Anthony Pooley, who can be reached at 206.817.0093 or [email protected]. Our local office is located at 600 108th Avenue NE, Suite 700, Bellevue, WA 98004.

Sincerely, JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.

Donald K. Nelson, PE Anthony J. Pooley, C.Eng. Project Principal Resident Engineer SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Section B Executive Summary

The SR 99 Bored Tunnel Design-Build Project is extraordinary in almost every respect. It is the centerpiece of a hugely ambitious project to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct (AWV), a vital element of Seattle-area infrastructure. The project is filled with technical challenges and its execution must be flawless. The most significant project challenges include: • Construction of the world’s largest diameter bored tunnel, in Seattle’s notoriously complex glacial geology, directly under Seattle’s downtown core. • Avoiding and mitigating settlement-induced damage to existing buildings, structures and utilities, including the existing Alaskan Way Viaduct. • Construction of deep, long excavations in poor ground at each tunnel portal. • Delivering the project safely, to a tight schedule and within budget, to the desired quality, and meeting environmental commitments. • Maximizing the positive impact of the project on the broader community, while dealing with a complex political environment surrounding the project.

The Role of Construction Management Overcoming these challenges will require a committed and above all collaborative approach from Seattle Tunnel Partners and WSDOT, supported by your chosen construction manage- ment support team. Your team must facilitate an environment where Seattle Tunnel Partners can succeed, by working cooperatively with them at every level, clearly communicating WSDOT’s needs and concerns, taking a leading role in dealing with external third-party issues (where WSDOT has far more experience locally than Seattle Tunnel Partners), and managing all day-to-day project business and documentation efficiently. In addition to supporting Seattle Tunnel Partners in its endeavors, WSDOT needs to provide sufficient tech- nical and managerial oversight to verify that the design, construction planning, and as-built construction meets all of the contract requirements and project goals.

The Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team Supporting you in your role as construction manager requires a team that can integrate seam- Committed to our Clients lessly into your project management team to capitalize on the strengths of both organizations, “This has been an outstanding provide the technical expertise and experience to meet the project’s technical and manage- project. We have had all the ment challenges, and work collaboratively with you and Seattle Tunnel Partners to proactively right results: good safety record, manage the project. low change orders, very good community relations, and good Jacobs and CH2M HILL (Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team) have teamed to support WSDOT in contractor relations. This result meeting these challenges, bringing together two world-class construction management firms hasn’t just been good luck, it for our third major tunneling project in Seattle in the past five years. Babendererde Engineers has been a collaborative effort has joined our team, adding its extensive global experience in large-diameter TBM tunneling, between King County, Jacobs, resulting in a team that is fully equipped to offer exceptional expertise and value to WSDOT. and the Contractor.” - Rick Andrews, Project Our Team provides: Representative, Henderson CSO Project • A Safety First culture and approach in everything we do. • Outstanding experience of every aspect of managing tunnel construction projects, developed from working on many complex and large diameter urban TBM tunnel projects around the world. • A proven team with unparalleled experience of managing soft ground tunneling projects in Seattle’s challenging ground conditions, and that meets your 11 technical qualifications. • A World Class Resident Engineer to support you in overseeing the construction effort. • Unmatched local capacity and availability for staff at all levels. • Innovative use of cutting-edge technology throughout our approach construction management.  SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services

The following sections describe each of these attributes and our successes to demonstrate our capabilities and the value and commitment we will bring to the SR 99 Project.

Safety First WSDOT has defined a safe project as its Number 1 project goal, a philosophy with which the Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team is completely aligned. With our recent experience on the Training the Next Generation Brightwater Conveyance and Sound Transit’s U-Link projects, we have unparalleled experi- Jacobs professionals have been ence with tunnel safety management locally, including involvement in compressed air TBM involved with the Northwest interventions and working with contractors and Labor & Industries to obtain the variances Laborers-Employers Training Trust required for compressed air work at high pressures. Jacobs and CH2M HILL have two of the in the creation of a tunnel training industry’s leading safety programs, and we have built a culture within the Team that makes center at the Satsop Development a safe working environment everyone’s responsibility. We have chosen a safety management Park, called Safety & Hazard team that has the specialized training and experience to develop a rigorous program of over- Awareness for Tunnels (SHAFT), sight, training, and reporting, and the commitment to drive it to every level of the project and two of our staff have taught organization, both in the office and on the work site. some of the first tunnel safety courses. We are committed to We have a track record of being able to influence contractor behavior to help the safety of Washington’s tunnel workers. meet your goal of a safe project. Outstanding International Experience on Urban Tunneling Projects Some of the best lessons learned can be found on the other side of the world, where innova- tive tunneling is taking place right now. Both Jacobs and CH2M HILL have vibrant tunneling groups who interact to share problem-solving techniques and technological breakthroughs that we can bring to the SR 99 Project. Our team brings extensive experience of tunneling in Europe and Southeast Asia. Key team members have worked on major projects in Singapore, Hong Kong, Bangkok, Switzerland, and , and are used to working with major inter- national contractors and building soft ground tunnels in dense urban environments. In fact, our proposed resident engineer, Anthony Pooley, worked with Dragados on a major tunneling effort at CERN in Switzerland.

Our experience on tunneling projects around the world means we bring lessons learned and innovative ideas for project efficiencies. Our experience with inter- national contractors means we know how they work and their expectations, and can work with you to keep lines of communication open and moving forward.

Proven Team with Unparalleled Local Experience A tunnel of this size requires a team with the expertise, resources, and safety-first attitude to complete. CH2M HILL and Jacobs are the #2 and #3 construction management firms in the U.S. respectively (Engineering News-Record, 2010), and have delivered more than $5 billion worth of projects together. Together, we have worked on every major tunnel project in the Seattle area for the past 10 years, giving us unparalleled experience with tunneling in local geology. Key members of these teams are proposed for the SR 99 Project. The team also has a strong understanding of issues which affect major projects tunnel locally, including the regu- latory environment, local agencies, labor issues, spoils disposal, community relations matters, and the local political climate. The Most Local Experience. The Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team has more experience tunneling in All of this means that our personnel can assist you in delivering your project on Seattle than any other team. Our schedule and to your expectations. personnel, lessons learned, safety program, and experience makes World Class Resident Engineer us the ideal choice to assist in The resident engineer is a key figure in the construction management effort. WSDOT needs managing the construction of someone with extensive international and local experience in soft ground tunnel boring, and this important and challenging who knows the local requirements to keep the project moving forward. Anthony Pooley brings project. an outstanding track record in the design and construction management of bored tunnels and

 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Executive Summary

deep excavations. In the past 16 years he has been involved in the design and construction of 23 miles of TBM-bored tunnels in soft ground and rock, mostly in dense urban environments, and 11 underground stations using cut-and-cover and slurry wall techniques. He has been a resident engineer/construction manager on major tunneling projects continuously for the past 10 years and has played a leading role in dealing with technical issues, claims, and dispute management. He has also had extensive roles in building damage assessment and mitigation, and instrumentation and monitoring on complex tunnels in London and Bangkok. In London, he was closely involved in one of the largest ever deployments of compensation grouting for settlement mitigation, most notably of the world famous Big Ben clock tower. Many teams offer design managers for construction manager roles, but Anthony is a proven construction Protecting Above-ground specialist with exceptional international and local tunnel experience. Resources. Anthony Pooley’s work on the Jubilee Line Tunnel Anthony brings world class experience, recognition and respect, and WSDOT can in London helped protect a world rest assured that they are being represented by a true professional. icon, in the Big Ben Clock Tower. Similar mitigation measures will be required to avoid settlement Committed and Available Staff at All Levels and structural damage to As a result of our continuous and ongoing involvement in tunnel construction manage- Seattle’s skyline – and his ment in Seattle in recent years, the Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team has a large and diverse pool experience makes him an ideal of committed, talented people in this area at every level – more than 200 tunnelers across choice for Resident Engineer. the country – from inspectors to engineers, project controls specialists and cost manage- ment specialists and safety managers, all completely familiar with major tunnel projects in this region and used to working as a team. The team already has synergy and established working relationships, which will minimize the “learning curve” when starting up the project. Moreover, our local offices have a wide variety of specialists in all project-related disciplines, Washington-area many of whom have already worked on this or other WSDOT projects, and who can be mobi- Firm Employees lized with no delay to provide short-term support as required. This will minimize the cost of Jacobs 348 providing these services to WSDOT compared with a team comprised of out-of-state exper- CH2M HILL 1,288 tise. Coupled with our low-cost approach to professional services, we can offer WSDOT more “bang for the buck.” Babendererde 1 UrbanTech 11 Our world-class team can be mobilized as and when required, with minimal Total Local mobilization delay or cost, to meet WSDOT’s needs. 1,648 Employees: Innovative Use of Technology A Local Team. Our depth of Our team utilizes cutting edge technology in every aspect of its approach to construction resources means we have the management. We created and implemented a web-based “Business Process Management” right people for the job locally, workflow application for the Brightwater program, which resulted in unprecedented effi- which saves the project money ciencies in the management of submittals, RFIs and many other areas of project adminis- and helps keep WSDOT dollars tration. Babendererde is the creator of Tunnel Process Control (TPC), which has been used in Washington. We can also bring additional necessary successfully worldwide on complex tunneling projects to monitor TBM performance and personnel to the project quickly, analyze tunneling problems and commercial issues. We catalogued the tens of thousands which saves time. of Brightwater construction photographs using a customized, fully searchable database, to provide a powerful search and archiving capability, an invaluable quality and reporting resource. These are just some of the innovative best practices we bring to our approach to construction management. Our familiarity with the latest tools and technology and our will- ingness to push boundaries to deliver superior performance means we can stay ahead of the curve in supporting your management of the project and dealing with potential and ongoing project issues. We are ready to bring these best practices to the SR 99 Project.

We can help keep WSDOT and stakeholders abreast of project issues at a moment’s notice, and work together to anticipate, mitigate, and solve project issues.

Together, the benefits of choosing the Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team are significant. We are ready to assist you in delivering the SR 99 Bored Tunnel.

 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services

Section C Team Profile and Experience

To deliver the highest quality construction management support services for the SR 99 Bored Tunnel Design-Build Project, the Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team brings highly qualified, moti- vated tunnel experts with worldwide large-bore tunnel construction management and design experience, a safety first focus, a history with the Alaskan Way Viaduct (AWV) Program, and unsurpassed experience of tunneling in Seattle’s challenging ground conditions gained from working on every major tunneling effort in Seattle over the past 10 years. We are committed to taking the valuable lessons learned from this experience and applying them to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel Project for the benefit of WSDOT, Seattle Tunnel Partners, and everyone involved in the project. Exhibit 1. Team Firms and Roles As shown in Exhibit 1, The Jacobs/CH2M HILL Washington State Team is supported by three additional subconsultant Department of Transportation firms who have specific expertise, experience, and relationships to address the project’s many complex challenges. The relevant experience of each firm is described in the following sections. Together we form

- Construction Management Support a construction management team that has the depth of - Safety Oversight - Project Controls expertise, the capacity, and the credibility to support - Resident Engineering and - Contract Management WSDOT in its strong owner role. We will integrate Inspection and Administration into your team, and work with you and Seattle Tunnel Partners to deliver this ambitious and impor- tant project safely, to budget, and - Resident Engineering - Tunnel/TBM Design Review on schedule, for the people of - Inspection - Tunnel Systems Integration - Grouting Inspection - Expert Advice on TBMs - Monitoring - Start-up Planning - Environmental Washington. - Inspection - Commissioning Compliance - Hyperbaric Specialists - TBM Data Analysis We are also committed to working with you to meet your project DBE goals, and provide real opportunities to DBE firms. We are proud to include a DBE-registered firm, UrbanTech Systems, on our team, and will look to include more should opportunities arise during the course of the project – all with the goal of meeting the Program’s overall 8 percent DBE goal.

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Jacobs is one of the world’s largest and most diverse providers of technical, professional, design, and construction management services for tunneling and underground projects, Project Role: contracted by Design-Build, Design-Bid-Build, or Public-Private Partnership (PPP) mech- • Resident Engineering and anisms. We offer our clients a wealth of experience gained in designing and managing Inspection construction of some of the largest projects in the world. Our unique, wide-ranging, recent • Construction Management tunneling experience that is relevant to the SR 99 Project includes: Support Services • Extensive Design-Build Experience: Jacobs is an industry leader for Design-Build • Safety Oversight tunnel projects in the U.S. We understand the roles of the parties along with the • Project Controls issues associated with Design-Build construction. Our notable Design-Build projects • Contract Management include: • Administration - Tren Urbano Transit Tunnel and Station, San Juan, Puerto Rico: We led the design of the first major underground Design-Build project in the U.S., which Local Employees (Offices): included segmental lining in soft ground. • 348 (Bellevue, Seattle, Rich- - Port of Miami Tunnel: We are the Engineer of Record for the first PPP (Design/ land, Portland) Build/Operate/Maintain) tunnel project in the U.S. It will be the largest single full-face bore (41 feet) Earth Pressure Balance (EPB) TBM in U.S. history prior to the SR 99 Tunnel.

 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Team Profile and Experience

• Construction Management Experience: We are currently providing construction management services for both active tunnel projects in Seattle, the Brightwater Conveyance Project and Sound Transit’s U-Link project, both of which have very similar ground conditions to the SR 99 Project. We are also currently providing construction management services for the largest transit tunnel project in New York City, the East Side Access project, valued at more than $7 billion. • Multi-disciplinary Tunnel Expertise: Our tunnel expertise encompasses civil, geotechnical, structural, and systems engineering (electrical, mechanical, lighting, and fire/life safety) services, which is uncommon to other companies. In addition to the projects shown above, we have provided design or construction management services for many other large diameter, precast concrete segmental lining tunnel projects in recent years, similar to the SR 99 tunnel, including:, the Upper Rouge CSO Tunnel (33 feet) in Detroit, Narragansett Bay CSO tunnel (30 feet) in Rhode Island, the Beacon Hill Transit Tunnel (22 feet) in Seattle, the Bay Tunnel (16 feet) Port of Miami’s Twin Bore 41- in San Mateo, the Sunnydale Sewer Tunnel (14 feet) in San Francisco, and the foot Diameter Tunnels Henderson CSO Tunnel (15 feet) in Seattle.

We have been working in Washington for more than 40 years, and have been tunneling in Seattle since 1980. In that time, we have designed or managed construction for more than 25 miles of deep bore/large diameter tunnels. We are also helping train the next generation of tunnelers. Our local professionals lent their assistance to the Northwest Laborers-Employers Training Trust in the creation of a tunnel training center at the Satsop Development Park, called Safety & Hazard Awareness for Tunnels (SHAFT), and two of our staff taught some of the first tunnel safety courses. The SHAFT program helps area contractors get the trained personnel necessary for the construction of all upcoming tunnels, including the SR 99 Tunnel Project.

Our extensive history providing tunnel construction management here in the Seattle area and around the world makes us an ideal choice to provide these services on the SR 99 Project to meet your needs.

CH2M HILL, Inc. Project Role: CH2M HILL is an employee-owned full-service consulting, construction and program management, design, and operations firm with a long history managing some of the world’s • Resident Engineering and largest infrastructure projects. The Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) Inspection has awarded the firm 10 Project Achievement Awards in the last 5 years. We also have received • Monitoring five project awards from regional construction magazines, and, as evidence of our commitment Local Employees (Offices): to safety; and four OSHA Voluntary Protection Plan Star awards in the last five years. • 1,288 (Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Spokane, Richland, We employ more than 90 professional tunneling staff in North America, providing expertise in Bellingham, Portland) tunnel project construction management, planning and design for tunnel project delivery, and tunnel program management. These staff members have completed tunneling projects across North America and around the world in nearly all ranges of ground condition – from cohesive residual soils to glacial till and granular alluvium and from weak chalk and mudstones to hard metamorphic rock.

Three members of CH2M HILL’s project team presented here worked together with Jacobs on the Brightwater Conveyance Project, and have developed exceptional working relationships that we bring to the SR 99 project. Our personnel worked together in the Brightwater project office – fully integrated and co-located with client staff. CH2M HILL and Jacobs are also teamed for the construction management of Sound Transit’s U-Link tunnel project.

 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Team Profile and Experience Babendererde, Inc. Project Role: Babendererde specializes in tunnel construction management and design, and is a recognized worldwide authority on large-diameter TBM tunneling in soft ground conditions, similar to the • Tunnel and TBM Design SR 99 project. Founded in 1991 in Germany, its U.S. sister company is based in Vancouver, Review Washington. They provide expert services and advice on tunneling to owners, contractors, and • Expert Advice on TBMs designers at all project stages in areas such as TBM selection, compressed air cutterhead inter- • Geotechnical Engineering Support and Inspection ventions, TBM instrumentation and data analysis, and excavation parameters and strategies – • Hyperbaric Specialists all of which are relevant to the SR 99 project. Local Employees (Offices): To support WSDOT, they will draw on a wealth of experience gained on many of the world’s • 1 (Vancouver) largest TBM bores, including the largest ever at 51 feet set to start in Italy, the Brixlegg Tunnel in Austria (43 feet), the Galleria Tunnel in Italy (40 feet), the Herrentunnel in Germany (38 feet), the two bores of the Wesertunnel in Germany (38 feet), and the Lisbon Metro in Portugal (31.5 feet). Babendererde personnel are also providing construction management services for the Port of Miami Tunnel Design-Build in Florida (41 feet), the largest bored tunnel to date in the U.S., where Jacobs is the lead designer.

In addition to their extensive track record in large diameter TBM tunneling, Babendererde also has strong experience in Seattle’s unique ground conditions. They were involved in the construction management of the Beacon Hill project for Sound Transit, where they provided review of all contractor’s technical submittals for tunneling and deep excavation, regular on-call tunnel and excavation inspections, and technical advice on tunneling issues. More recently, Babendererde staff provided tunnel design services for the Brightwater project, and also advised King County on the ongoing commercial and technical issues surrounding the Central Tunnel TBMs. They also provided their Tunnel Process Control (TPC) software to Brightwater, which allowed real-time monitoring of the TBMs and facilitated detailed anal- ysis of the TBM data when required.

Personnel from Babendererde, Jacobs, and CH2M HILL worked jointly on the implementa- tion of TPC at Brightwater and jointly produced a paper together on this subject at the 2009 Rapid Excavation & Tunneling Conference, evidence of our collaborative team environment.

Everett Engineers, Inc. Project Role: Everett Engineers brings specialized transportation systems engineering expertise to the team in the areas of fire/life safety analysis, tunnel ventilation analysis and design, emergency • Tunnel Systems Integration and power systems, tunnel SCADA systems, tunnel lighting and controls, and cost estimating. Start-up Planning They offer specialized evaluation, analysis, design, and construction support services to meet the unique challenges of roadway and transit engineering. Their personnel have experience in all levels of transportation system engineering from concept validation, feasibility studies, and Experience Working Together preliminary engineering through detailed design, cost estimating and construction. Everett Everett is currently the Resident staff are experts in the application of state building and national industry codes and standards Engineer for the construction (ICC, NFPA, IEEE, NEMA, ASHRAE, ASTM, ANSI, VA, MILSTD and others) and have of the Brightwater Conveyance been trained in best practice methods through their association or employment with national Project Influent Pump Station. industry leading clients and consultants, including Jacobs. The firm is a Service-Disabled Veteran-owned Small Business.

Urban Tech Systems Project Role: UrbanTech is a diverse, multidiscipline construction management and engineering firm located in Seattle. Registered as a MBE/DBE, their staff brings more than 175 years of • Grouting Inspection combined industry experience for clients around Washington. We are currently working • Environmental Compliance together on the Brightwater Conveyance Project, where UrbanTech is providing outside plant Local Employees (Offices): design, third-party coordination, and electrical engineering. In 2007, UrbanTech Systems • 11 (Seattle) joined the Sound Transit Advisory Board for the U-Link segment, another bored tunnel project for which Jacobs and CH2M HILL are providing construction management services.

 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Team Profile and Experience Experienced Working as a Team A project of this complexity, with the schedule goals you have set, means you need a team A Team That Works Well that is experienced working together so they can start moving forward from Day 1 without the Together “getting to know you” phase that is typical on large projects. As evidenced previously, all of Jacobs and CH2M HILL our team member firms have experience working together both here in Seattle and around the are Seattle’s leading tunnel world. Our collaborations on the Brightwater Conveyance Project, Sound Transit’s U-Link, construction managers, and Port of Miami Tunnel, and others means we know each firm’s key individuals and depend on together we offer unmatched each other to work efficiently as a seamless organization to provide timely, high-quality, and qualifications, local staff safe work to you. resources, and experience with our unique local geology. Project Experience The Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team has completed many complex and challenging projects over the past three years as a team. To illustrate this, Exhibit 2 highlights a selection of tunneling projects that featured a similar scope of services to this one, and demonstrates our ability to meet all 11 of your Technical Qualifications. It is followed by information about the projects Jacobs and CH2M HILL have completed together, followed by each team member firms’ indi- vidual experience. This experience, coupled with the specialized expertise of our subconsul- tants, provides you with the capability and capacity to bring creative solutions to the project. Each project features a reference whom we invite you to contact, as well as a listing of those services that we performed that were identified in your RFQ.

Exhibit 2. Projects of Similar Size and Scope

 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Team Profile and Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project King County, Washington

Project Scope and Summary: This $1.5 billion conveyance project includes 14 miles of segment-lined tunnels ranging from 14 to 20 feet in diameter, constructed using soft-ground tunneling techniques through glacial tills and highly variable soft ground geology, under hydrostatic pressures up to 7 bar, at depths of 40 to 440 feet below the surface. The project involves state-of-the-art EPB hyperbaric tunneling challenges that were a first in the U.S. for driving long, “single reach” tunnels under significant hydro- static pressure.

Our Role and Responsibilities: Jacobs, as the prime, teamed with CH2M HILL, Central TBM Launch Shaft Babendererde, Everett, and UrbanTech are providing construction management services. Work includes overseeing pre-construction and construction activities, and we are responsible for project management including program level cost estimating and sched- uling for all the construction activities and the interface management of program-wide, Reference: multiple construction contracts. Our services include construction management support, Judy Cochran inspection and resident engineering, safety, quality assurance, Project Advisory Board; Project Manager - Brightwater project controls including scheduling, cost control, and cost estimating; information 206.205.1459 management, web-based project information management system, and document control Achievements: services; constructability reviews; construction management plan development, and community relations. • Constructability Reviews provided cost and schedule savings to the project • Accurate Initial “Engineer’s Esti- Similarities to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel mates” were within accurate narrow EPB TBM tunnels, with uninterrupted single runs of more than 2 miles. limits of bids received • • Met our 10% MBE and 6% WBE • Highly variable glacial geology. goals • Bolted/gasketed, concrete segmental tunnel lining up to 18 feet in Safety Record: finished diameter. • Man-hours Worked (to Date): • Tunneling at hydrostatic pressures up to 7 bar, requiring hyperbaric 380,000 interventions through air lock systems fitted within the shields to • Personal Injury Rate: 1.05* accommodate worker entry into cutter-head chambers. • Dart (Days Away Restricted or • EPB launch shaft is located below the water table in saline conditions. Transfer): 0.0 • King County and Jacobs/CH2M HILL construction management staff * One recordable incident to date are fully integrated and co-located on site.

Celebrating the East Tunnel Breakthrough A Section of Completed Central Tunnel

10 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Team Profile and Experience Sound Transit University Link (U-Link) Light Rail Program Seattle, Washington

Project Scope and Summary: This $1.7 billion transit tunnel program is constructing twin 3.2 mile, 21-foot-diameter tunnels from just north of downtown to Husky Stadium, including two deep light rail stations and connections to existing light rail construction. The project is a nine-year effort to link downtown Seattle with the University of Washington, and is being constructed under densely built-up urban topog- raphy and I-5. Like most tunnels in Seattle, these are constructed entirely in highly variable glacial and interglacial deposits. Tunneling is at depths of 15 to 300 feet, Capitol Hill Station Construction with hydrostatic pressures of up to 6 bar. The contractor is using a Hitachi-Zosen EPB machine for both drives on Contract U230, which have an internal diameter of 18 feet, utilizing a 9.8-inch precast gasketed lining. The project also includes two Herrenknecht EPB machines on Contract U220.

Reference: Our Role and Responsibilities: The Jacobs/CH2M HILL team is charged with over- seeing all phases of U-Link construction, from constructability reviews to demolition Joe Gildner and construction through testing and commissioning of the light rail system. We perform University Link Project Director day-to-day contract administration for the program, and also have overall responsibility 206.689.3350 for safety, and have three full-time safety inspectors at the site at all times. Sound Transit Achievements: has numerous goals for the program, which include: Proactively identifying and solving • We have successfully completed problems; Managing costs and risks; Coordinating work with stakeholders, including four of the eight contracts on WSDOT; Overseeing and inspecting all construction activities; and maintaining U- schedule and under budget. The Link’s schedule. other four are currently under construction • We are currently exceeding our Similarities to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel Phase 1 DBE goal of 17% • EPB TBM tunnels, with uninterrupted single runs of more than 2 miles. Safety Record: • Highly variable glacial geology. • Man-hours Worked (2010): • Bolted/gasketed, concrete segmental tunnel lining more than 20 feet in 114,080 finished diameter. • Personal Injury Rate: 0.0 • Dart (Days Away Restricted or • Tunneling at hydrostatic pressures up to 6 bar, requiring hyperbaric Transfer): 0.0 interventions through air lock systems fitted within the shields to accommodate worker entry into cutter-head chambers. • Construction under dense urban populations and associated infrastructure. • Sound Transit and Jacobs/CH2M HILL construction management staff are fully integrated and co-located on site.

Construction Staging at the University of Washington Station Site

11 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Team Profile and Experience Jacobs Experience

Henderson CSO Control Project King County, Washington Jacobs provided construction management services for this project, which included an upgrade and expansion of an existing wastewater pump station, new conveyance pipelines, and a storage tunnel. The 3,100-foot-long, 14-foot 8-inch-diameter storage and treatment tunnel running along 42nd Avenue South right-of-way was mined through soft ground using a Lovat EPB TBM with segmented liners at depths ranging from 30 to 90 feet. Other work included soft ground tunneling of a 735-foot-long, 60-inch-diameter microtunnel using an EPB slurry shield and tunneling 42-inch to 72-inch diameter tunnels for 1,250 feet through soft ground using a variable opening, rotating cutterhead TBM with depths ranging from 10 Committed to our Client to 65 feet below grade. The project alignment transversed extremely high traffic areas in a “Jacobs was very focused on our congested urban setting, with tunneled crossings under I-5 and multiple railroad tracks. We needs as an owner. They never were proud to have zero reportable incidents. stopped listening to us. As a project manager, I couldn’t have We provided pre-construction services including constructability review, scheduling, public asked for a better CM to work involvement, and bidding support. During construction, we were integrated and co-located with.” with King county and our role included full service on-site construction management, field - Rick Andrews, Project inspection, complete project controls, scheduling, and document control. We coordinated start Representative up activities for all facilities and close-out for all phases of the project. Reference: Rick Andrews, PE, Wastewater Engineer, 206.296.1432

North Shore Connector Tunnel Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania As part of a joint venture, we are providing construction and program management for the $528 million expansion of Pittsburgh’s existing light rail system. The expansion consists of 1.2 miles of 22-foot diameter soft ground bored tunnels under the Allegheny River, cut- and-cover tunnels, underground stations, and aerial structures. The TBM-bored tunnels were constructed under high hydrostatic heads in soft ground conditions, utilizing slurry tunneling method (STM) constant-face pressure technology.

Jacobs is responsible for managing all aspects of the program, including safety, tunneling, construction management, scheduling, the FEIS, preliminary engineering, and final design. Jacobs is also responsible for track, signal, communication systems, overhead contact systems, traction power substations, passenger stations, and systems integration. The program also includes major grading, drainage, bridge, and tunnel and wall construction. Additional coordination was required to incorporate the North Shore line into the Central Business District line and to expand the Operations Control Center. Value Engineering for Project Savings. Jacobs led a value Jacobs also performed a separate value engineering study of the tunneling method to review engineering study that identified the validity of immersed tube construction technology in this application. STM and EPB more than $14 million in savings. tunneling was shown to be a more cost effective method, which would result in a $14-million savings in base costs or $21 million with escalation and contingency costs applied. EPB and STM also reduced environmental permitting complications by minimizing any riverbed disturbance.

Jacobs was also responsible for supporting the Record of Decision and Full Funding Grant Agreement process to get the project funded, resulting in an 80% federal share. This included environmental, preliminary and final engineering oversight, and management responsibilities. Reference: Winston Simmonds, Rail Ops/Engineering Officer, 412.566.5106

12 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Team Profile and Experience CH2M HILL Experience

Denny Way/Lake Union CSO Program Seattle, Washington This project involved design and construction a $120-million storage tunnel and conveyance pipelines. CH2M HILL provided construction management services from design through construction of this facility and the overall CSO program. We also participated in design coor- dination and review, cost control and analysis, and preparation of all project schedules. The new Mercer Street storage tunnel is 6,200 feet long and 14.8 feet in diameter and will provide 7.2 MG of CSO storage. The Elliott West CSO control facilities will receive and treat flows Area Pioneers. This was the from the Mercer Street pipeline, and will include a 250-million-gallons-per-day (MGD) pump first EPB bored soft soil tunnel in station. Treated flows will flow by gravity through a 2,950-foot-long, 96-inch-diameter pipe- Seattle’s history. line to the Elliott West outfall, which will extend 500 feet offshore and discharge in 60 to 70 feet of water. Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager - Brightwater, 206.205.1459

Singapore Deep Tunnel Sewerage System and Infrastructure Construction Program Singapore The $3.65 billion Deep Tunnel and Infrastructure Design-Build Construction Program, with Tunnel Manager Derek Dugan, represents one of only two successfully completed and oper- ating major deep-tunnel sewer overflow systems in the world. The system consists of 30 miles of tunnels up to 20 feet in finished diameter (24 feet excavated diameter) constructed using eight EPB TBMs in soft ground, hard rock, and mixed face conditions. The tunnels range in depth from 65 to 165 feet and are fully lined with nine 10-inch-thick bolted and gasketed Committed to Safety. More precast concrete segments installed during tunneling. Subsequently, corrosion protection than 20 million labor hours were linings consisting of a 2.5-millimeter-thick inner HDPE membrane and a 9-inch unrein- worked across all six design-build forced corrosion resistant concrete, were cast against the segments to provide a 100-year, contracts with accident frequency maintenance-free design life. Ground treatment methods included freezing with nitrogen, rates (number of accidents per compressed air, jet grouting, permeation grouting, and recharge systems. CH2M HILL one million labor hours worked) performed program/construction management services under two contracts. We led design, as low as 1.43, compared to the construction, and commissioning. industry average of 10.6. Reference: Wah Yuen Long, Director, [email protected]

London Tideway Tunnels Integrated Delivery Partner London, England CH2M HILL, as program manager, is working with the UK’s largest water company to develop the London Tideway Tunnels – two major new tunnels needed to substantially reduce the volume of untreated sewage overflowing from London’s Victorian sewers into the River Thames – estimated to be approximately 51 million cubic yards in an average year (enough to fill the Royal Albert Hall 450 times). The deepest tunnels ever constructed in the capital (more Integrated Team. More than than 250 feet beneath ground level), the diameter of both the tunnels will be wider than three 75 CH2M HILL and teaming London buses placed side by side. They are: partner staff share offices The Thames Tunnel, which starts in west London and broadly following the path of in two locations, providing • critical leadership and staff the River Thames through the centre of the capital. It is proposed to transfer the flows augmentation support during from the 34 most-polluting CSOs to Beckton Sewage Treatment Works in the east of the London Tideway Tunnels the city. Construction is due to commence in 2013, for completion in 2020. program. • The Lee Tunnel is shorter (4.3 miles) yet will eliminate some 21 million cubic yards of sewage from being discharged to the River Lee from Abbey Mills Pumping Station Stratford. Flow from the Lee Tunnel will also be processed at Beckton. Construction started in June 2010 for completion in 2014. Reference: Phil Stride, Thames Water Utilities, 44.7747.642.404

13 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Team Profile and Experience Babendererde Experience

Port of Miami Tunnel Miami, Florida This design-build project, with Jacobs as lead engineer of the design-build team, involves construction of a road connection between the Port of Miami Cruise Ship Terminal and Watson Island under the Port Channel. The twin bored tunnels will each carry two lanes of traffic, connected by three cross passages. To excavate through the coarse sands and lime- stone, the project will employ a 41-foot diameter EPB TBM. Babendererde is part of the construction management JV and will be responsible for the TBM monitoring of the excava- tion, which is scheduled for deployment is due at the end of 2010. Port of Miami’s Twin Bore 41- Reference: Felix Vergara, PB Americas, 305.261.4785 foot Diameter Tunnels Brixlegg Tunnel, Lot H3-4 and Lot H8 Austria This project involved construction of the Northern approach high speed rail tunnels to the Brenner Alp Crossing. Two slurry TBMs excavated a twin-track tunnel with a length of approximately 3.6 miles and a 43-foot excavation diameter. The project’s geology was comprised of coarse sands and gravels, and the alignment passed under a river, a railway line, and a highway.

Babendererde provided geological construction management services to the contractor (under a special requirement of the main contract) for all three TBMs., including the work on the 21 rescue shafts. The teams were supported by Babendererde’s TPC software package. Their work included geological mapping, tunneling operation, and settlement control for the TBM 41-foot Slurry TBM and rescue tunnels, as well as face support calculations, setting up of ground measurement devices, and monitoring settlement. Reference: Hans Köhler, Head of Tunneling Department, [email protected]

Herrentunnel Lübeck, Germany To solve major harbor development issues, the City of Lübeck, an important ferry port, decided to replace an aging bridge with two 0.5-mile-long tunnels, each 38 feet in diameter constructed with a pressurized face TBM through soft ground. The lining is of sealed precast concrete segments, installed as one-pass lining. Only in-situ concrete walls, acting as impact protection, have been placed at each side in the tunnels. Three cross-passage tunnels connect the main tubes as safety and escape ways. Those cross-passages were conventionally mined under the river protected by ground freezing umbrellas.

The geology consisted of fluvial sands and silts over glacial till with boulders. At the same time the pre-glacial sands act as the aquifer storing the drinking water of Lübeck, thus any ground and water contamination had to be prevented. The embedded boulders were found to 38-foot Pressurized-face TBM be very abrasive, and necessitated frequent intervention into the excavation chamber under compressed air.

Babendererde performed as specialist engineer for the tunnels and TBM operation. Their tasks were review of TBM operations, regular tunnel inspections for quality control, and conces- sionaire assistance during meetings. Reference: Stefan Klotz, Lübeck Traffic Administrator, [email protected]

14 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services

Section D Key Personnel

Resident Engineer Anthony Pooley has personally assembled his team based on two criteria: Specific Experience and Availability. This is important because the “Best Person for the Job” is not the best if they are committed elsewhere. The personnel proposed in this proposal are the ones who will be with you in the tunnel.

Team Member Availability and Capacity Exhibit 3 illustrates our key team members and their availability, shown as percent of time available for the SR 99 Bored Tunnel for the length of the contract.

Exhibit 3. Team Member Availability Project Availability Key Team Members Role Firm Phase 1 Phase 2 Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. Resident Engineer Jacobs 100% 100% Derek Dugan Deputy Resident Engineer -Tunnel CH2M HILL 50-100% 100% Roger Johnson Chief Tunnel Inspector CH2M HILL As needed 100% Clifford Feurtado Tunnel Inspector CH2M HILL As needed 100% Larry (Bud) Green Grouting Inspector Jacobs As needed 100% Howard Sawyer Tunnel Systems Integrator, Oversight/Inspection Everett 50% 100% Donald Olson, PE Instrumentation Inspector CH2M HILL As needed 100% Ven Tseng, PE Schedule Engineer Jacobs 100% 100% Connie Krier, CSS Safety Engineer Jacobs 100% 100%

We also have additional staff resources to support accelerated schedules, unanticipated tech- nical needs, or other unforeseen events. Together, our team has nearly 1,650 employees in the Washington area and more than 78,500 around the world. This gives us a nearly inexhaustible resource base from which to deliver the best person for any needed position.

Experienced Key Personnel The personnel selected for our team were chosen based on their experience in the specific scope elements you identify in the RFQ. Each is experienced working underground, and most are located right here in Seattle. Exhibit 4 (following page) correlates our key team members’ We Are Local Tunnelers. A expertise with your 11 technical scope elements. major advantage of the Jacobs/ CH2M HILL Team is the majority It is followed by brief qualifications for the key personnel identified above and in your RFQ. of our staff that are Seattle-area More information and complete resumes for all team members can be found in the SF 330 residents. We know the area, the section in the Appendix. geology, and local regulations. We are committed to this important project for our city.

15 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel

Exhibit 4. Key Personnel Experience

Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. Project Role: Responsiveness to your needs, commitment to safety, strong leader- Resident Engineer ship, attention to quality, past experience, and familiarity with projects of this type are the key ingredients to a successful resident engineer for Years of Experience this contract. WSDOT needs a resident engineer you can trust, who has 24 the international experience to apply best practices and work with your contractors, who knows about tunneling in urban environments, and who Strengths to the Team has the support of local personnel who can fill their roles with excitement and commitment. For • Major international and these reasons, we have selected Anthony Pooley to lead our team. local tunnel experience • Design-Build Experience Anthony, a resident of Mercer Island, has worked continuously in the field of tunneling and • Soft ground tunneling geotechnical engineering since 1986, including work on large-bore tunneling in Seattle. His exten- expertise sive international experience in the construction management and design of tunnels and deep • Expert in geotechnical settle- excavations includes major bored tunnel projects in Bangkok (design-build), London, and at the ment monitoring CERN facility in Switzerland. He also has experience in numerical analysis and geotechnical • Expert at web-based project instrumentation monitoring of tunneling-induced settlement, which will be critical on the SR 99 management systems Tunnel. He was recently invited by the prestigious British Tunnelling Society in London to make • Locally based and knows a presentation on the history of tunneling in Seattle, which he did successfully last September, area conditions demonstrating his comprehensive knowledge of tunneling in Seattle and the challenges it presents. • Accomplished at working on fully integrated and co- located teams He has spent the past 10 years leading construction management teams on two major tunnel proj- ects, gaining hands-on experience with project management at every stage of a project’s life. He understands that construction management is a broad discipline, encompassing safety management, cost estimating and management, contract and dispute management, data management, third-party coordination, and many other subdisciplines.

Anthony’s extensive international and local experience, combined with his technical and management expertise, gives him an unpar- alleled breadth of knowledge and perspective that will be invaluable to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel Project.

16 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel

Anthony’s Project Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager, 206.205.1459 As Project Manager, Anthony led the 50-person, fully integrated and co-located construction management services team for this $1.5 billion wastewater treatment and conveyance project. Responsibilities included overseeing preconstruction and construction activities for 14 miles of soft ground tunneling using EPB and Slurry techniques in difficult geology with hydrostatic heads up to 7 bar. He was responsible for setting up and overseeing site teams to manage and inspect all three tunnel contracts, and took a leading role in defining construction management processes and procedures. He designed and implemented an innovative web-based business process management workflow- controlled database to process and track all day-to-day contractual processes (RFIs, Submittals, Field Directives, Correspondence, etc.), used by more than 400 users, including contractors, consultants, and owner staff. He took a leading role in evaluating and implementing Babendererde’s web-based TBM data management software system across all four tunnel drives, which provided real-time access to the TBMs as they excavated and was a powerful tool for construction oversight and analysis of contractual claims. He also played a key role in advising the owner on commercial matters (changes, claims, and disputes) covering a broad range of issues.

Anthony took a leadership approach to safety management, as Jacobs had responsibility for oversight of all contractors’ safety programs and review of all safety submittals. He successfully advocated increasing the number of safety management staff on the project to provide a more effective site presence. Early in the project he proposed a sweeping range of improvements to the Jacobs safety program allowing Jacobs to “lead by example” on the project, which were implemented under his oversight. Jacobs’ safety record for the Brightwater project shows one minor incident and no lost work days since the start of the project in 2005. This is an outstanding achievement, of which the whole team is justifiably proud. In October the project was awarded Jacobs’ highest safety honor, a 2010 President’s Health Safety & Environment Excellence Award.

Civil Engineering Works for the CNGS (Neutrino) Project, Geneva, Switzerland Reference: Natacha Lopez Hernandez, Head of Civil Engineering at CERN, 011.41.22.767.2192 Anthony served a dual role as Construction Manager and Designer’s Representative on this $80 million project to construct a new particle physics experiment at the prestigious CERN particle physics laboratory. Responsibilities included management of all aspects of construction and implementation of a series of major tunnel alignment and design changes during construction. Anthony was also a member of the design team for this project, which included construction of two miles of new chambers and tunnels ranging from 14 feet to 33 feet in diameter. Excavation was carried out using an open-face TBM and two road headers. Challenges included the presence of naturally occurring hydrocarbons within the rock, steep downhill slopes on the tunnels, crown instability in weak mudstones, strict environmental noise controls, a tight schedule, and the logistical constraint of a single access shaft for all the tunnels. As a consequence of our outstanding performance in managing the tunnel construction, Jacobs’ scope was expanded to include management of a follow-on contract to install a 3,000-foot-long vacuum tube in the completed tunnels (the world’s largest such tube). The project was completed on schedule and under budget, with no outstanding commercial issues.

Jubilee Line Extension Project Contract 102, London, England Reference: David Harris, Project Leader for Geotechnical Consulting Group, 011.44.207.581.8348 Anthony served as Geotechnical Specialist for this $5 billion project to add 11 new stations and associated twin-bored running tunnels to London’s Jubilee metro line. After working on the design of the Westminster station, He was seconded to the Owner’s construction management team as part of a specialist geotechnical group to oversee tunneling and station excavation. The team focused particularly on issues associated with tunneling and excavation-induced settlement, including building damage assessment, geotechnical monitoring, and compensation grouting.

He was involved with the project’s most high profile section, which involved excavation of the deepest open excavation ever made in London, immediately adjacent to the historic Big Ben clock tower and directly beneath an operating metro line. The tunnel ran under numerous historic, protected buildings in the heart of London, and featured the most extensive application of compensation grouting ever undertaken worldwide at that time. The project also required installation and monitoring of a huge array of geotechnical and structural monitoring instrumentation, and pioneering use of a network-based database to manage the vast quantities of data produced.

The project developed the principle of “Planned Tunnel Advance,” where the advance of the tunnel excavation is controlled and modified as it progresses, in response to monitoring data, TBM data, ground improvement performance, and any other relevant infor- mation, as a powerful form of risk management.

Particular aspects of interest that He was directly involved in included working with third parties (mainly property owners and their engi- neering consultants) to address concerns and issues related to tunnel-induced building damage, a detailed review of NATM proposals for the project, monitoring structural performance of the Westminster Station slurry walls and permanent props as the top-down excavation proceeded, and review and planning for compensation grouting, including beneath Big Ben.

17 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel

Derek Dugan Project Role: Derek Dugan, based in Woodinville, is an ideal choice for this role because Deputy Resident Engineer - his 35 years of experience includes extensive work and expertise in soft Tunnel ground tunneling and associated structure construction. He is currently Years of Experience working on the Brightwater Conveyance Project as resident engineer and tunnel inspector – completing much of the same work for which he is 35 proposed on this project. He has also completed tunnel projects around the Strengths to the Team world, many of which involved driving large-diameter tunnels constructed with EPB and Slurry TBMs in densely populated urban areas, such as London and Singapore, with difficult ground • Soft ground tunneling expe- conditions and high hydrostatic pressures. rience around the world • Local experience on Derek’s experience includes extended periods of involvement in the construction of several large- Brightwater diameter tunnels and crossovers in Hong Kong. The high hydrostatic head and the decomposed • Established working rela- nature of the ground meant that these tunnels were driven under compressed air along alignments tionship with project team that passed through urban areas, beneath main highways, and adjacent to many high-rise build- members ings. Derek and Anthony are a proven team from two other tunnel projects, Brightwater and the • Experience with integrated Jubilee Line Extension in London. and co-located teams

Derek’s Project Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager, 206.205.1459 As Resident Engineer, Derek is a member of the construction management team overseeing all aspects of the tunnels. Derek’s respon- sibilities include: daily supervision of the contractor’s construction progress; reviewing contractor’s submittals and proposals for construction; reviewing and processing of contractor’s requests for additional information; assessing contractor’s claims for additional time and money; coordination with adjacent interfacing project contracts; working with contractor to overcome construction problems; being a liaison with third-party agencies regarding interfaces with the construction works; and reporting contract status to both the CM and client on a weekly/monthly basis.

Deep Tunnel Sewer Scheme (DTSS) Contract T04, Singapore Reference: Wah Yuen Long, Director, [email protected] Derek was the Resident Engineer and member of the project management team responsible for overseeing all aspects of the Phase I construction of the $325 million (Singapore dollars) DTSS project. The project required the construction of 30 miles of large-diameter tunnels through a variety of ground conditions employing EPB tunneling machines. He oversaw the construction of contract T04, which involved the driving of 4.47 miles of 14-foot-diameter (internal) finished tunnels, segmental concrete lined with the subsequent installation of a secondary corrosion protection system. His responsibilities included: Daily supervision of the contractor’s construction progress; reviewing contractor’s submittals and proposals for construction; reviewing and processing contractor’s requests for additional information; assessing contractor’s claims for additional time and money; coordinating with adjacent interfacing project contracts; working with contractor to overcome construction problems, liaising with third-party agencies regarding interfaces with the construction works; and reporting contract status to both the construction manager and client on a monthly basis.

C611, Tseung Kwan O Extension, Hong Kong, China Reference: David Salisbury, Construction Manager, 2795 9991 (Hong Kong Fax Number) As Tunnel Manager, Derek worked with the Kier - Hyundai Joint Venture contractor and provided on-site supervision of the excavation of twin large-diameter rock tunnels and associated depot tunnels, sidings, crossovers, intersections, fan niches, and construction enlarge- ments for the Pak Shing Kok running tunnels. The tunnels were constructed using drill and blast techniques; employing computerized Atlas Copco Jumbo twin boomed drilling rigs and packaged and bulk explosives; and utilizing temporary support based on the NGI system requiring varying combinations of shotcrete and rock bolts (Resin and Swellex variety).

18 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel

Roger Johnson Project Role: High-quality inspection services are important because of the soft soils Chief Tunnel Inspector that are present, the technical challenges of operating the TBM, and the Years of Experience overall safety concerns. The Chief Tunnel Inspector works together with Derek Dugan and participates in these and many other important func- 24 tions as a key member of the team. For this reason we have selected Roger Strengths to the Team Johnson as our Chief Tunnel Inspector. • Experienced with soft ground Roger, a tunnel inspector and resident of Snohomish, is familiar with our area’s unique geologic and hard rock TBMs and tunneling concerns, as well as the regulatory climate, from his work on area tunneling proj- • Locally based and knows ects. He has 15 years of underground experience that includes the use of soft ground and hard the soils rock TBMs. He brings strong working knowledge of Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act • Familiar with the team (WISHA) codes, based on his Brightwater work. He has been managing construction teams in compliance with OSHA and Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) codes for most of his career. Roger’s Project Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager, 206.205.1459 As Senior Tunnel Inspector, Roger is responsible for coordination of construction inspectors, inspection activities for conformance to plans and specifications, documentation of daily construction activities and progress, notifying Resident Engineer Derek Dugan of any changed conditions or contractor noncompliance. A key part of his job is day-to-day troubleshooting of problems as they arise with contractors and safety. He is also the site safety coordinator.

West Side Combined Sewer Overflow, Portland, OR Reference: Mike Reiner, Portland Bureau Environmental Services, 503.823.2431 Roger was a Tunnel Walker/Supervisor for this $293-million project, which involved the drilling of a 130-foot-deep, 18,200-foot-long, 14-foot-diameter tunnel with Herrenknecht slurry shield TBM—the first slurry shield TBM in the U.S.—in soft ground below the water table. Roger’s day-to-day responsibility revolved around troubleshooting to maintain continuous operation of underground tunneling opera- tions and supervising a 15-man crew. He was responsible for the mining and disposal operation, including safely, and was in simultaneous charge of the TBM and the slurry plant. He was charged with overseeing tunnel operations for safety and efficiency, adherence to backfill grout parameters, and the timing of the supply train, including the slurry plant. He coordinated tunneling to avoid utilities and made certain that minings were disposed of promptly. The project achieved VPP status with OSHA, based on safety process and performance record, and was delivered ahead of schedule and under budget.

Clifford Feurtado Project Role: Clifford, from SeaTac, is a tunnel inspector with more than five years of Tunnel Inspector experience in pressurized face tunneling, and more than a year of expe- Years of Experience rience as a locomotive operator. He was a lead person in the tunnel constructing three shield tunnels in Kent. He has a proven ability to effec- 11 tively communicate with general contractors and staff at all levels, and Strengths to the Team has developed excellent rapports with internal and external clients and customers. He also has extensive experience as a lead/supervisor, including training and day • Experienced with local supervision of up to 12 employees, which is a benefit to our team in developing a program to train geology and regulations your tunnel inspectors. • Experience training new inspectors Clifford’s Project Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager, 206.205.1459 As East Tunnel Inspector, Clifford was responsible for overseeing tunnel excavation progress and inspecting the quality of segmental lining installation for the 13,800-foot tunnel. He notified the Resident Engineer of progress, including changes in ground conditions, TBM performance issues, and any quality non-compliance issues observed. He documented daily construction activities and progress in a daily report and construction photographs, and documented safety behaviors and concerns in Safety Observation Reports.

19 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel

Sound Transit U-Link Tunnels, Seattle, WA Reference: Joe Gildner, University Link Project Director, 206.689.3350 Clifford is Resident Tunnel Inspector on this $360 million, 3.15 mile, light rail extension that will run in twin-bored tunnels from downtown Seattle north to the University of Washington, with stations at Capitol Hill and on the University of Washington campus near the Husky football stadium, using 100,000 feet of lined segmented tunnel.

Howard Sawyer Project Role: Howard is a mechanical/controls project systems start-up and commis- Tunnel Systems Integrator, sioning specialist with more than 25 years of experience in the operations, Oversight/Inspection maintenance, design, construction, start-up, and commissioning fields. Years of Experience Howard’s areas of expertise include construction management, design review, engineering support during construction, and commissioning of 22 building mechanical and controls, HVAC systems, storm and tunnel water Strengths to the Team pumping stations, and tunnel and facility fire and life-safety systems. He has also been directly responsible for the startup and commissioning of low- and medium-voltage power distribution • Experienced with automo- systems, normal and emergency electrical distribution, backup generation and UPS systems, facility tive tunnel systems, including lighting, fire detection, suppression and alarm systems, and projectwide SCADA systems. He HVAC and Life Safety prepares and manages all required construction documents, test procedure development and report • Experienced with local regu- reviews, performs technical analysis, code reviews and construction phase services including shop lations and standards drawing reviews, RFI responses, final inspections, and punch-list development/resolution. He has also developed operations and maintenance manuals; utilized computerized maintenance and asset management systems; and trained owner/operators on mechanical, electrical, and control systems to support turning over equipment and systems to the owner. Howard’s Project Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager, 206.205.1459 Howard is providing Resident Engineer services at the 130 mgd Influent Pump Station (IPS) station. Howard’s role includes managing a staff of 15 professionals, including an Office Engineer, Chief Inspector, and Inspectors. He is overseeing contractor activities and monitoring progress to make certain all work is performed in accordance with the contract and approved design. All processes are managed using the Intellect Project Management software program. IPS was the pilot project for implementation of this management program. He also led the efforts in development of the contractor’s testing and commissioning program. He scoped all project systems by defining system boundaries such that system test procedures could be developed, allowing for complete and safe testing.

Central Artery Tunnel Project, Boston, MA Reference: Mike Fitzpatrick, Deputy Director of Security, 617.248.6303 As Senior Startup Engineer and Lead Startup and Commissioning Engineer, Howard was responsible for developing, approving, and witnessing startup and commissioning activities from preconstruction through turnover for stormwater pumping stations. The equipment included automatic transfer switches; motor control centers; large vertical turbine and submersible pumps; check and air/vacuum release valves and associated equipment; panels, heating, ventilation and dehumidification equipment; explosive gas detection systems; terminal cabinets for connection to project-wide control and monitoring system; potable water systems; and overhead cranes/hoists.

Howard performed pre-construction design reviews to make certain the engineer’s design was in compliance with the project design criteria. He monitored the construction process by performing submittal reviews to make certain the contractor-proposed equipment and systems were in accordance with the engineer’s plans and specifications. He assisted the contractor in developing comprehensive commissioning test plans and procedures for all mechanical, electrical and control equipment, and was responsible for making certain operations and maintenance manuals supplied by the contractor were in accordance with the extensive project requirements.

20 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel

Larry (Bud) Green Project Role: Bud has more than 30 years of specialized experience as a senior Grouting Inspector inspector, grouting inspector, and mining inspector for numerous Years of Experience tunneling and grouting projects in Washington, California, New Mexico, New Jersey, Kansas, Utah, and Arizona. He has completed numerous 43 projects in seismically active areas, including Seattle, Los Angeles, and Strengths to the Team San Francisco. His technical training is extensive, and includes 80-hour Soils Classification and Identification and Basic Rock Identification; 80-hour Blasters Training and Safety; 80-hour • Familiar with grouting in Mining and Heavy Equipment Safety; 96-hour Drilling and Sampling for Engineering Purposes; local conditions with differ- 40-hour Health and Safety Training for Hazardous Waste Workers; 32-hour Construction Safety ent compounds Standards; and 32-hour Drilling Mud School. • Can assist with TBM as- sembly and operation inspection Bud’s Project Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager, 206.205.1459 Bud is the Senior Inspector for King County for the Central Contract. In addition, Bud was the mining inspector for TBM assembly, excavation, lining, and pipe installation. He is responsible for assisting and advising inspectors working underground; monitoring sepa- ration/slurry plant operations, slurry consistency and on going modifications to the separation process and separation plant equipment; and ensuring compliance with the NPDES permit.

Arrowhead West Tunnel, Inland Feeder Project, San Francisco, CA Reference: Dave Farmer, District Supervisor, 951.206.9222 (after 3:00 p.m. PST please) Bud was a Management Consultant to the Metropolitan Water District responsible for providing inspection of the Arrowhead West Tunnel. Responsibilities included inspection of the TBM excavation of a 19.1-foot-diameter, 4,900-foot-long tunnel using state-of-the-art Herrenknecht hybrid slurry TBM and laser guidance system; and installation inspection of bolted/gasketed concrete primary lining capable of withstanding 1,100-foot potential hydrostatic pressures. In addition, he inspected and directed probe and grout hole drilling using five Arrow percussion; inspected and directed probe and consolidation grouting using Portland and Microfine cements; inspected and directed three stages of annulas/contact grouting using a sand/cement slurry, Portland, and Microfine cements; and inspected and directed contrac- tor’s activities for soil grouting with sodium silicate and contractor’s installation/implementation of bag rings to shunt water outside liner.

Riverside Badlands Tunnel, Inland Feeder Project, Riverside, CA Reference: Dave Farmer, Metropolitan Water District Supervisor, 951.206.9222 (after 3:00 p.m. PST please) Bud was the Mining Inspector for this 16.8-foot-diameter by 8-mile-long tunnel. He inspected the TBM excavation and inspected and directed the contractor’s urethane, sodium silicate, and cementatious grouting activities. He also inspected the placement of the cellular concrete annulus backfill and contact grouting and the application of the mortar liner placed inside the steel liner.

Donald Olson, PE Project Role: Geotechnical and structural monitoring will be a vital element in plan- Instrumentation Inspector ning, controlling, and monitoring the advance of the TBM under down- Years of Experience town Seattle. The instrumentation engineer needs a detailed understanding of instrumentation, and its installation, monitoring, and data interpretation. 40 Additionally, he needs a complete understanding of the ongoing tunnel Strengths to the Team process by developing a detailed understanding of how the monitoring data fits into the bigger picture involving structural risk and behavior, geology, spoil characteris- • Expert at the use of all appli- tics, TBM data, and advance parameters. cable inspection equipment • Experienced in urban Donald’s principal work has been in major pre-design, design, construction management, and tunneling claims response efforts for shafts, tunnels, and chambers in rock and soil environments. He has extensive experience with bore hole extensometers, tape extensometers, digital inclinometers, strain gauges, and others. Most of his masters degree studies were oriented to geotechnical instrumentation. His first tunnel job with a contractor was to do ground move- ment measurements as part of a significant VE proposal to change the excavation and support criteria of the job based on real time measurements of the geology. He has worked around the world on a wide variety of tunneling and related projects, monitoring geotechnical instrumentation and providing design and construction support services.

21 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel

Donald’s Project Experience Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) Projects, Milwaukee, WI Reference: David Kasper, Section Manager, 414.225.2183 Donald has been Resident Engineer on six MMSD construction contracts over the past six years, including the North 27th Street Inline Storage System Extension – a 21-foot-diameter, 10,500-foot-long rock tunnel project. He also provided services on the Franklin Pump Station and the Oak Creek South Interceptor, a 6,000-foot micro-tunnel in soil. His work included contractor installation and monitoring of shaft deformation monitors at two locations and groundwater level monitoring throughout the project. He also oversaw installation of two digital piezometers for long-term groundwater-level sensing and sampling.

MMSD Deep Tunnel and Shaft System, Milwaukee, WI Reference: Tom Zimmerman, Engineering, Design, and Construction Manager, 414.225.2147 Donald served as Geotechnical Team Lead for this investigation, the results of which were used in developing the contract documents for the excavation and lining of a 9-mile-long, 300-foot-deep tunnel and associated shafts in weathered and unweathered rock. After completion of the investigation, he became construction manager for the pump chamber and tunnel system. Extensive pre- and post- excavation grouting with cement and chemical grouts was used in large sections of the tunnel system. Temporary support of the shaft soils included soil freezing, steel liner plates with internal ring beams, and driven-steel sheeting. Temporary support of the shaft rock included the use of several types of rock dowels and cast-in-place concrete.

MMSD Tunnel Program, Milwaukee, WI Reference: Tom Zimmerman, Engineering, Design, and Construction Manager, 414.225.2147 Donald was Geotechnical Coordinator for seven miles of shallow tunnels and shafts, which included soft ground excavation using a Lovat closed-face tunnel boring machine in highly variable soil and groundwater conditions, hand mining using a roof-support shield, drill and blast rock excavation, jacked-pipe tunneling, open-cut pipe installation, and a river crossing. For the pre-cast segments, he researched the historic aspects of this method of support. He presided over a series of tests studying the strength and suitability of segments for tunnel operations. The report that resulted from these activities led to early acceptance by authorities of pre-cast linings in tunnels throughout the Milwaukee area.

Ven Tseng, PE Project Role: The Bored Tunnel is the largest portion of the AWV Program at just under Schedule Engineer $2 billion. This is a tremendous outlay during a time of budget tightening Years of Experience and a slowdown in the local overall economy. The project itself is techni- cally daunting, and expected to meet a tight schedule. A well-programmed 27 master schedule, combined with effective monitoring and mitigation can Strengths to the Team make certain the project is delivered on time. Ven’s international and local experience on deep tunnel programs and other megaprojects make him the right choice to for • Major international design- Schedule Engineer. build tunnel experience • Worked as Project Controls Ven has 27 years of experience in transportation infrastructure construction management of proj- Manager for a major inter- ects around the world and has a proven track record of proficiency in planning, scheduling, inter- national contractor faces management, claims resolution, and administration of multiphased construction contracts for underground motorway/rail projects. A resident of Issaquah, he has hands-on work experience specializing on the startup of project control functions for large-scale turnkey projects similar to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel. Ven’s approach to scheduling is to establish the project baseline, in terms of schedule, in the project initialization stage. By monitoring and reviewing the schedule, he always main- tains an overall view of the project.

Ven’s Project Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager, 206.205.1459 Ven’s responsibilities as Project Controls Manager include coordinating the responsibilities of six project controls staff with technical backgrounds of estimating, scheduling, claims review/entitlement analysis, project alternatives/scenarios development to meet demands of the management team, and deliver accurate reporting of project level schedules and cost. He presents and assists with the estab- lishment of overall program goals related to project controls. Ven also reviews and comments on all contractors’ detailed construction schedules, including their schedule of values for payment purpose, and is responsible for monitoring and updating the master schedule.

22 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel

Project Controls Support for Various Projects in the Asia Pacific Region, Bangkok, Thailand Reference: Ernst Weber, Managing Director of Asia-Pacific Branch, 49.611.708.832 During Ven’s assignment as a Project Controls Manager for Bilfinger Berger AG’s Asia Pacific Regional Operations, he was responsible for providing support to various projects/offices in establishing and/or improving their project controls functions. He has participated in several large-scale project bid proposal preparation, particularly in the areas of estimating and scheduling: Thessaloniki Metro Project in Thessaloniki, Greece ($1.1 billion); Cross City Tunnel Project in Sydney, Australia ($400 million); North South Bypass Tunnel Project in Brisbane, Australia ($1.8 billion); and the Bangkok New Airport Transit Link Project in Thailand ($750 million). His construction experience acquired working for a successful international contractor for more than 15 years has made him a valuable expert in construction sequencing, constructability review, contract dispute entitlement analysis, project budget/cost, and scheduling control.

Bangkok MRT Underground Structure South Design-Build Project, Bangkok, Thailand Reference: Ernst Weber, Managing Director of Asia-Pacific Branch, 49.611.708.832 As Planning and Scheduling Manager, Ven led a team of eight schedulers to provide scheduling control function to the joint venture’s project management office in planning, monitoring, controlling, and managing project execution. This design-build project included the design and construction of a $950 million underground structures South Contract of nine underground stations, two cut- and-cover crossover structures, five miles of twin bored tunnels, one mile of a cut and cover depot approach ramp, and other ancillary facilities. He successfully justified and settled all program related entitlements.

As manager, Ven established management procedures for planning, scheduling, interface coordination, progress assessment and reporting, all of which have been fully implemented within the joint venture organization in five major construction offices. He developed and obtained a detailed works program with more than 12,000 activities, which covered the contract scope of design, civil/structural construction, architectural finishes, and interfaces coordination with systemwide designated contractors in achieving contractual key dates, as well as testing and commissioning of the entire line section. He also prepared and provided to the project management a quarterly computerized project presentation of updated project overall view in terms of work site availability, design status, construction method to be utilized, income/expenditure status, project critical path, project manpower forecast, and other project related information. This project was completed ahead of schedule. Our Resident Engineer, Anthony Pooley, also worked on the design of this project, carrying out deep excavation design, numerical analysis, specifying the scope of monitoring instrumentation and reviewing instrumentation data.

Connie Krier, CSS Project Role: Safety Engineer You have identified safety as the #1 project goal. For this reason, we have selected Connie Krier as our Safety Manager. Connie, a resident of Years of Experience Auburn, is currently managing safety on the Brightwater Conveyance Project, and is a Certified Construction Safety Specialist, a qualification 10 obtained from University of Washington. She is a member of the advi- Strengths to the Team sory committee steering and defining SHAFT (the local unions’ tunnel safety training course); is registered as a stakeholder committee member for the forthcoming over- • Certified Construction Safety Specialist haul of local compressed air regulations; made a presentation to the Governor’s Construction • Hands-on Experience with Safety Conference in 2009 on the subject of underground safety; and is OSHA 500 certified, which Washington L&I regulations means she can train staff on OSHA 10 and 30. Her experience includes analyzing employers’ acci- • Knowledgeable of com- dent records, industrial insurance data, and safety inspection. She advises management, employees, pressed air requirements and clients on methods and procedures to eliminate hazardous conditions, conducting follow-up and hyperbaric interventions consultations as required.

Connie has daily working knowledge of tunneling here in Washington, including compressed air work and the variances required for working under pressure. She has worked with both EPB and slurry machines, and is knowledgeable of their potential safety hazards. She is able to distinguish which codes apply to underground construction and which apply to all construction work. She has been involved in the safety oversight of the facilities as well and is knowledgeable in the safety differences in underground construction, as well as permanent facility requirements. Connie’s Project Experience Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA Reference: Judy Cochran, Project Manager, 206.205.1459 As Safety Manager, Connie’s main responsibility is the safety of the management team, client representatives, and site visitors. She also provides safety oversight of the four contracts, which include submittal reviews, job walk hazard assessments, recommendations of hazard abatement, reviews and comments on safety manual updates, and interface with the client and contractor. She keeps training

23 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Key Personnel and records up to date for the construction management team and client team; she coordinates the walks with the Owner Controlled Insurance Programs (OCIP) administrators and makes certain of follow up compliance from the contractors. She helps the client to maintain their contractor safety incentive program by tracking hours worked, tracking on the job incidents, and corrective measures. She conducts safety evaluation reviews with the client and contractors, and coordinates safety issues with regard to contract interface between the four contractors. She addresses safety issues on site with the contractors’ safety managers and works with them to under- stand Washington Administrative Codes and the differences from OSHA federal codes helping them to come into compliance. As evidence of her and the team’s success, to date there has only been one minor recordable incident and no lost work days for her team on the entire project. Under her leadership, the project was awarded a 2010 President’s HSE Excellence Award, Jacobs’ highest safety- related performance award.

With the unique dynamic of four contractors, 14 miles of tunnel with two different TBM types, and building a pump station facility, the team utilizes a web-based Safety Observation Report system to track and feed information to Connie on a daily basis. She uses this infor- mation to direct her attention to the most needed location immediately and helps to track hazardous trends, behaviors, and follow-up actions.

Public Utility District (PUD) No. 1 of Douglas County, Wells Dam Employee Safety Manual Update, East Wenatchee, WA Reference: Mike Bruno, Wells Dam Plant Superintendent, 509.881.2490 Connie, as Safety Consultant, helped in the updating the Employee Site Safety Manual at Wells Dam for Douglas County to make certain all facets of known and predictable hazards where properly addressed. These include descriptions of roles and responsibilities of dam staff, general safety rules, site access, training, first aid, emergency procedures, reporting procedures, hot work procedures, PPE requirements, water safety, fall protection, confined space safety, lock out-tag out (LOTO) procedures, machine/tool safety, crane safety, and environmental hazards. She conducted a walk-around inspection at the dam to identify potential hazards, as well as areas in need of hazard corrections. She has served as an on-call safety consultant for this project. During the engineering of fall protection systems at the dam she helped to maintain compliance with State fall protection standards that exceed OSHA federal standards.

Department of Labor and Industries, Tukwila, WA Reference: Kelly Monohan, Dept. of Labor and Industries, 425.290.1300 As a Safety Consultant, Connie provided on-site consultative assistance to employers of all sizes in the region, with emphasis placed on assisting in high-hazard industries and assisting employers in developing and implementing safety programs designed to meet Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) Washington Administrative Codes (WAC) Standards. She produced formal reports citing hazards and the associated specific codes. She followed up on all reports to maintain employer compliance with abatement. In addition, she evaluated employer-written safety programs, recommended hazard controls to prevent injuries and illnesses, provided training, and conducted workshops as needed. Her knowledge of WAC includes how to reference, look up, and interpret codes; in addition to being able to identify hazards find the correlating code and make recommendations on abatement methods.

24 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services

Section E Approach to the Work

TECHNICAL APPROACH The Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team recognizes that the SR 99 Bored Tunnel is an exceptionally challenging and complex project. It will be the most “urban” bored tunnel yet built in Seattle. Extensive measures will be required to prevent and mitigate potential tunneling-induced settle- ments and protect adjacent structures, buildings, and utilities from damage. The existing SR 99 viaduct will itself be one of the most at-risk structures in this respect. The tunnel’s unprec- edented diameter brings special challenges compared with smaller tunnels. Maintenance of face stability will be absolutely critical, and the magnitude of surface settlement will be highly sensitive to the “volume loss” at the face (because of the large unit excavation volume). This means that tight control of the face conditions and pressures will be essential. Additionally, the large diameter magnifies the potential risks associated with spoils management and disposal.

Based on our current knowledge of the SR 99 project, gained through extensive project research, and our team’s vast experience with projects of this type, we have reviewed the key challenges for the TBM drive. We consider them to be: • Very large diameter means that settlement magnitude is very sensitive to volume loss, Unmatched International and requiring excellent face control and careful attention to actual excavated volumes for Local Experience. Jacobs, each advance. CH2M HILL, and Babendererde • Poor ground conditions above the TBM in areas of shallow cover at each end of have been involved in the design drive, especially at the start of the drive. and construction management of tunnels up to 51 feet in diameter • Risk of settlement and consequential damage to overlying and adjacent structures, in all parts of the world, including building, and utilities. many design-build projects. • Unanticipated boulders and sudden, unexpected changes in ground conditions. We have also been involved • Possible spoils management issues, due to the location of the site, the large quantities in the design and successful of spoil generated by mining, and possible uncertainties in the availability of spoil construction management of disposal sites. every pressurized face TBM • Logistical complexity of constructing interior structures during tunneling (if Seattle tunnel using EPB or Slurry TBMs Tunnel Partners chooses to do so). ever built in Seattle, namely Denny Way CSO, Henderson Managing the tunnel excavation and mitigating these risks will require an integrated CSO, Beacon Hill, Brightwater, approach, combining every aspect of excavation, monitoring, grouting, and settlement mitiga- and U-Link. tion into a single coordinated process, carefully planned, rigorously monitored while in prog- ress, and constantly reviewed and adjusted based on experience. No other team can match this combination of world- Such a project calls for an experienced construction management support services team that class and local experience. can integrate seamlessly with your team and work cooperatively with Seattle Tunnel Partners to provide the specialized technical support you require. In fact, the Design-Build contract specifically calls for a cooperative and collaborative approach to the work. Our Team provides all of the necessary specialized experience, combined with an unparalleled understanding of tunnel construction conditions and practices, both internationally and locally.

The following sections describe our approach to the 11 technical qualification elements iden- tified in Section IV of your RFQ. We have included illustrations of our breadth of experience and examples of key projects on which our team members have worked.

1. Soft Ground Pressurized Face TBM Tunnels Constructed Below Groundwater A properly designed TBM, a well-thought-out tunnel excavation plan, and effective imple- mentation of that plan are the keys to successful excavation of any TBM tunnel. Getting these elements right is especially important in the case of the SR 99 tunnel, given the unprec- edented diameter of the bore and the project’s urban location. We will work proactively and

25 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

cooperatively with you and Seattle Tunnel Partners to manage and monitor each stage of TBM procurement, excavation planning, and the excavation process, deploying resources, and drawing upon an extensive pool of additional expertise, as needed, to achieve a successful tunnel drive.

TBM Procurement Getting the right TBM is the crucial first step to a successful drive. We will assist you and Seattle Tunnel Partners as the TBM’s detailed design is developed, offering input based on our extensive experience with soft ground TBM tunneling at all diameters, in all ground conditions, and in the Seattle area over the past 10 years. We will verify that it meets all of your criteria, reviewing all design submittals and participating in Task Force meet- ings throughout the TBM design and procurement process. Our unmatched experience of tunneling in Seattle’s soils will be of particular benefit to both Seattle Tunnel Partners (this is Dragados’ first tunnel in Seattle) and WSDOT during this procurement stage. Our full partic- ipation in this process, coupled with reporting, will give you confidence that the TBM design TBM Leaders. Babendererde, is on course for success. our exclusive subconsultant, is a world leader in mechanized TBM • Full-time Coverage and Participation in Task Force: Resident Engineer Anthony consulting, and has worked on Pooley and Deputy Resident Engineer Derek Dugan will provide full-time coverage dozens of very large diameter of TBM design and procurement, with support from Babendererde Engineers bores – up to 51 feet. and Chief Tunnel Inspector Roger Johnson and inspector Carl Neagoy (who has previously worked for two TBM manufacturers). Involving Roger and Carl at this early stage will be valuable, leveraging their experience and knowledge with operating TBMs, and allowing them to be familiar with the actual TBM prior to the start of assembly and testing. • Detailed Internal Review of TBM Study and Other Submittals: We will independently review the contractor’s preliminary TBM study submitted during the NTP 1 period and, if necessary, provide additional reviews by our on-call team of TBM specialists (see Exhibit 12, page 48). Our aim will be to verify that Seattle Tunnel Partners’ proposals meet the contract requirements and are designed for success in the expected ground conditions. • Factory Visits: We will propose that Babendererde personnel visit the TBM factory during assembly and testing, with the number of visits depending on the location of the manufacturer selected by Seattle Tunnel Partners. This will allow our Team to monitor the procurement and manufacturing process for both quality and schedule purposes, and provide updates to you. We will also confirm progress information provided by the contractor during this period.

Development of Tunnel Excavation Plan In many TBM drives, the need to advance the TBM as quickly as possible governs the excava- tion process, with monitoring and other considerations following behind. This is not the case for TBM tunnels in dense urban settings, and especially not for a tunnel as large as yours. For this tunnel, excavation, ring building, and lining grouting must be seen as parts of a broader Experience with Large TBMs. overall process designed to deliver the tunnel incident-free, which includes planning, moni- Tunnel Inspector Carl Neagoy toring, ground treatment, and data review. The process will be well defined in advance, in a recently visited the Herrenknecht Tunnel Excavation Plan prepared by Seattle Tunnel Partners in the months after Notice to factory in Germany and toured Proceed 2 (NTP 2) and leading up to the start of tunnel excavation. We will participate in TBM the world’s largest TBM (to date). Excavation Plan development to provide you with a strong technical voice in this process, Babendererde’s TPC software providing verification that the plan meets contract requirements and is structured for success. will be used to monitor this drive. We will conduct an independent review, if required, which will benefit you by providing an The SR 99 TBM will be seven feet additional level of oversight of this critical part of the preparations for construction. larger. • Participation In Development of Excavation Plan: We will participate fully in the development and review of the tunnel excavation plan, drawing on our experience on similar projects in Seattle and around the world. Our involvement in this process will help you verify that the plan meets the contract requirements, and that it is a practical, workable plan that can deliver the tunnel incident-free. The tunnel excavation plan will be coordinated with proposals for geotechnical and structural 26 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

monitoring, ground improvement (e.g., compensation grouting), spoil disposal, and safety to make certain these aspects of construction work successfully together. • Independent Review of Completed Plan: If you require, we will undertake an independent review of the Tunnel Excavation Plan in the form of a workshop with our on-call TBM experts. Our experience has shown us that a fresh set of eyes can provide valuable perspectives that might be missed by those working day-to-day on the project. • Development of Inspection and Reporting Procedure (for Quality Verification): We will develop an inspection and reporting procedure for verification that the Tunnel Excavation Plan is being followed, which will become part of the overall construction management plan. A key element will be the establishment of a daily process to review the previous day’s events (monitoring and TBM performance data) and to plan International Best Practices ahead for forthcoming tunneling and other related operations. The review team will Brought to Your Project. play a key role in controlling the advance of the TBM, in conjunction with all other Anthony Pooley and Derek related activities. We expect that the team will comprise members of Seattle Tunnel Dugan both worked on Partners’ staff, your personnel, and key supporting consultant personnel. construction of the Jubilee Line Extension project, which remains Excavation: Implementation and Oversight of the Excavation Plan to this day a benchmark project Once the TBM drive starts, the key to success will be to follow the Tunnel Excavation Plan in urban soft ground tunneling. closely for both startup and normal operation phases. Successful drive oversight and manage- ment requires that all the necessary data is collected accurately, then reviewed and reported Their experience with urban EPB in a timely manner, before advancing the tunnel excavation. Additionally, the effectiveness of tunneling, deep excavations, the excavation plan will need to be reviewed periodically and modifications made if necessary geotechnical monitoring, and to deliver an incident-free drive. Most incidents with TBMs occur because the drive is not compensation grouting on this being managed according to plan, combined with a failure of management to recognize that project are directly relevant to the SR 99 Project. fact and implement adequate review processes. Our oversight of the TBM drive, in cooperation with Seattle Tunnel Partners and combined with detailed independent data review, will give you verification that the TBM is being managed in accordance with the Excavation Plan and confidence that the drive is on course for success. This approach also makes sure that you will have all the data you need in the event that commercial issues arise in connection with the TBM drive. • Task Force Participation: The design-build contract requires establishment of a Task Force to conduct daily reviews of all relevant data (TBM, geotechnical and structural monitoring, ground treatment, upcoming ground conditions), to assess the effectiveness of currently implemented technical parameters, and to plan for the forthcoming tunneling. Our personnel will participate fully in this Task Force, working cooperatively with Seattle Tunnel Partners and WSDOT personnel towards an incident-free drive. • Detailed Inspection and Oversight: Tunnel inspectors will observe every aspect Construction Management of field operations, recording information that will supplement the TBM and Professionals Experienced in instrumentation data, giving our personnel a clear view of what is working and what Planning TBM Drives needs to be improved as the drive proceeds. Inspectors’ daily reports will provide a Anthony Pooley and Derek valuable independent record of events on the TBM drive. Dugan were closely involved • Independent Data Review: We will independently review the progress of TBM in Brightwater’s construction operations, utilizing TBM data provided by Seattle Tunnel Partners, geotechnical and planning phase, including structural monitoring data, information collected by our inspectors, and information detailed constructability reviews on any settlement mitigation measures undertaken ahead of and during tunneling. for all tunnel contracts, review of tunneling specifications, and We recognize the importance of collaborative, proactive involvement of the construction review of contractors’ exca- management team in every stage of TBM design, procurement, assembly, and operation. By vation plans for all drives. These detailed reviews led to smoother, involving ourselves in this way, and leveraging our unique combination of international soft more successful drives. ground urban tunneling experience and unparalleled experience of tunneling in local soils, we will assist WSDOT in achieving an incident-free drive.

27 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work 2. TBM Instrumentation and Performance Analysis Modern TBMs produce vast quantities of digital data. Regular review and analysis of this data is vital to running the TBM and can be a powerful risk mitigation tool. Such data may also be important when commercial issues arise on a project. Independent data review will significantly benefit both WSDOT and Seattle Tunnel Partners by providing an additional set of eyes on the TBM data, facilitating collaborative review of TBM performance. For your team, the combination of TBM data and additional field data added manually to the data set will provide an even fuller picture of TBM performance, which would be invaluable in the event that problems and/or commercial issues occur associated with the TBM drive. For these reasons, it is important to have a clear strategy for TBM data collection, storage, main- Technological Advances Make tenance, and review. Our approach to this issue is guided by Babendererde’s experience with a Better Drive. Babendererde its Tunnel Process Control (TPC) software on projects worldwide, including its use on all four are the creators of “Tunnel Brightwater drives. To deliver these benefits we will work with you to: Process Control (TPC),” a • Choose an Appropriate Software Tool: Software used to collect and analyze comprehensive TBM data TBM data should allow users to create custom reports that can be used as part of a collection and analysis suite that regular reporting system. It should also allow the addition of external data, such as can be configured to work with photographs and details of segment damage and repair and TBM downtime data, any modern TBM, regardless of to provide a complete record of the tunnel drive in a single data repository. We will manufacturer. Jacobs and CH2M HILL successfully used TPC on evaluate the software proposed by Seattle Tunnel Partners to make certain it meets all four Brightwater tunnel drives the your reporting needs and recommend an alternative if it does not. for regular review of excavation • Maintain the Data Throughout the TBM Drive: It is tempting to let data parameters and back analysis for accumulate and only review it when a problem arises. Our experience in this area commercial issues. shows that the best way to manage and maintain the data is day-by-day, so that the data is checked and reviewed while it is still current. This approach makes certain that the data is checked and verified, and additional information added as necessary, while recent events are still fresh in everyone’s mind. This has the benefits of improving confidence in the data when it is used for reporting, and improving the efficiency of data analysis exercises later on when, say, a commercial dispute gives rise to the need for detailed analysis. • Report Regularly: We will define a daily, weekly, and monthly reporting routine for the various levels of project management so that construction management team members receive the data they need regularly, in a clear and concise format, and in manageable quantities. Reporting in this way means that everybody involved will benefit from the data collected. • Analyze TBM Performance in Different Geological Zones Encountered: We will Grout Pressure vs. Face Pressure make a particular effort to carry out a comparative analysis of TBM performance in different types of ground as the drive progresses, partly to allow prediction of performance on subsequent sections of the drive and partly to facilitate review of the TBM drive parameters based on experience. This adds value to the process of ongoing tunneling risk assessment and mitigation.

3. One-Pass Pre-Cast Bolted Gasketed Segmental Concrete Lining TBM Advance Speed vs. Cutterhead Torque Systems All of our key tunnel personnel have worked with bolted, gasketed segmental linings on proj- Systematic TBM Data Review ects worldwide, and most recently on the Brightwater project in Seattle, where this type of and Reporting To Mitigate lining was used for the entire 13 miles of bored tunnel. We understand the paramount impor- Risk. Regular review and tance of quality and accuracy in the design, testing, transport, and installation of segmental reporting of key TBM data, linings. We will use this knowledge and experience to verify the quality of segments at each such as the graphs above, helps stage of production, transport, and installation. By approaching this in a methodical fashion optimize TBM performance we will generate detailed records, demonstrating that the contract requirements have been met, to mitigate tunneling risk as giving you confidence that you are receiving a quality product from Seattle Tunnel Partners. the drive proceeds, helping to achieve an incident-free drive.

28 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work Design Stage and Trial Liner Assembly We will review Seattle Tunnel Partners’ design and installation proposals, checking that they comply with your requirements and using our extensive experience to identify potential issues before they become problems. With your staff, we will make frequent visits to the segment casting facility, beginning at the early stages of preparation for manufacturing, to verify that the facilities proposed are capable of meeting the high quality standards required for this project. We will continue to make periodic visits during production casting to see that these standards are being maintained.

Visiting Suppliers to Verify We will have be present throughout the trial liner assembly testing and will produce indepen- Quality. Jacobs and CH2M dent documentation of this test, as a form of verification of the results submitted by Seattle HILL inspectors made frequent Tunnel Partners. We will also review the test results coming from the facility to check for any visits to the Tacoma segment non-conformances. facility throughout the Brightwater project and are doing the same Schedule/Transport/Storage for the U-Link project. Space on the construction site is expected to be limited, and considerable numbers of segments may need to be temporarily stored off site and delivered on an as-needed basis. The segment fabrication and as- Such logistical constraints give rise to a risk of delay to the project. We will review segment built quality has been consistently production schedules and transportation arrangements, then compare them with expected high throughout the Brightwater tunneling advance rates to help mitigate the risk of delay to tunneling caused by segment project. unavailability. We will continue to monitor this risk as segment production and tunneling proceed in parallel. We will also review the delivery and transportation routes for possible logistics and community impact problems. Where possible, we will visually inspect stored segments for defects before they are taken into the tunnel.

Installation and Repair We understand that quality construction is vitally important in a sub-aqueous tunnel with a single-pass lining, as it forms the tunnel’s only permanent lining. Dimensional out-of-toler- ance issues also need to be avoided and quickly adjusted for, because over a few rings they can accumulate into a significant alignment error, which is very difficult to correct and can cause problems with the overall tunnel alignment envelope. Poorly built rings can also affect the TBM’s steering and increase the stresses on the lining during subsequent TBM move- ments. Our tunnel inspectors (and your inspectors trained by our personnel) will monitor every segment installation to make certain that the required quality and dimensional toler- ances are achieved. Defects will be recorded, photographed, and logged to an appropriate database where they can be tracked until repaired. We will review the contractor’s tunnel Verifying Quality of Every survey data to verify that dimensional tolerances are being maintained. Cracked, broken, or Installed Ring. All of our poorly gasketed segments will be rejected prior to installation. Non-conformance reports inspectors have extensive will be issued for out-of-tolerance rings and resulting remedial actions tracked. However, the experience working with focus needs to be on building the rings correctly, because it is very difficult and often impos- segmental linings. We will visually sible to adjust bolted linings after they have been installed. check every segment before and after installation for defects and accuracy of alignment to make 4. Hyperbaric Interventions for TBM Maintenance/Repair certain you get a high quality Our resident engineering, inspection and safety staff all have previous involvement in lining. compressed air and mixed gas (tri-mix) hyperbaric cutterhead interventions at more than 5 bar of pressure. Some of our staff are trained in and have carried out compressed air cutter- head entries, and our inspectors have overseen hundreds of hyperbaric inspections on the Brightwater Project. We have the broadest possible understanding of the practical, safety, and regulatory aspects of compressed air interventions, combined with recent on-site involvement in such interventions. We also understand the potential wider implications of such interven- tions for the project as a whole, in terms of schedule and cost risk. We will bring this experi- ence to bear for the benefit and safety of all involved, to mitigate the following main risks: • Safety: While the contractor will be ultimately responsible for making certain that interventions are carried out safely, this is a complex, potentially risky activity. An extra pair of eyes verifying that plans and procedures are followed is valuable for everyone to reduce the risk of decompression sickness and other adverse health effects. 29 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

• Schedule Risk and Commercial Issues: High intervention pressures limit both the duration and type of work that can be carried out effectively during interventions (e.g., welding at high pressures is problematic). In these circumstances, extensive intervention work can become a significant schedule and commercial issue. Thorough oversight provides detailed records of events to you that may be vital in negotiating settlements of future commercial disputes. • Quality: In cases where significant repairs to the cutterhead are required, an independent inspection to verify the repairs might be necessary.

For the SR 99 tunnel, we will participate fully in intervention planning and closely monitor Trained for Hyperbaric and document interventions as they occur. In the unlikely event that we are required to enter Interventions. Members of the cutterhead, our trained staff would be able to do so. Our team’s experience in cutterhead our team, including Derek interventions worldwide means you can have confidence that we are able to address whatever Dugan and Philipp Elsner, have undergone compressed conditions may arise and oversee the intervention process effectively. air training and can undertake compressed air cutterhead Our recent and ongoing experience on the Brightwater and U-Link projects has provided us inspections if necessary. Philipp with an excellent understanding of the federal and local state regulatory environment for this participated in compressed air type of work. We worked closely with the contractors and King County to help prepare appli- interventions for the Brixlegg cations for variances from the current state regulations (defined in the 1960s) to allow inter- Project in Austria. Our experience ventions at pressures greater than 50 psi. In fact, Safety Engineer Connie Krier is registered to and oversight will help make be a member of the Stakeholders’ Committee for the forthcoming Labor & Industries review certain of safe interventions for a of Washington compressed air regulations. safer project. 5. Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Protection of Existing Structures Geotechnical and structural instrumentation and monitoring will form an integral part of the process by which the TBM is advanced under downtown. It will be used to detect movements and provide early warnings of damage to structures, buildings, and utilities, and to gauge the Challenging Tunneling Projects effectiveness of the contractor’s excavation plan and ground treatment/settlement mitigation Monitored by a Qualified Team measures on an ongoing basis. Instrumentation Inspector Don Olson was chief geotechnical Seattle Tunnel Partners will design, install, maintain, and monitor the required instrumenta- instrumentation engineer for tion. However, our experience around the world has shown clearly that independent review a 13,000-foot-long tunnel for and oversight of monitoring regimes is a vital tool in making certain that the data receives Baltimore’s subway system. Monitoring was essential to the adequate scrutiny. We will work with Seattle Tunnel Partners in the Task Force responsible success of a major value engi- for defining the monitoring and reporting regime. It will be important to mobilize the moni- neering effort that saved the owner toring effort sufficiently early so that baseline readings and natural diurnal ground and struc- hundreds of thousands of dollars. tural movements can be identified prior to the start of construction.

Anthony has extensive experience From the start of monitoring and through the construction phase, we will participate fully in with all aspects of instrumentation joint reviews of data with Seattle Tunnel Partners and undertake independent reviews for veri- in London and Bangkok. He was fication. We will suggest changes to the monitoring procedures based on our observations and part of the geotechnical monitoring experience, as necessary, and will define and implement an internal reporting process for you team for the Westminster section of so that members of your team are kept up to date at an appropriate level of detail. We also the Jubilee Line Extension project understand the sensitivity of monitoring activities in the field because they are highly visible (JLEP), the largest use of geotech- to the property owners whose buildings and businesses would potentially be affected by any nical and structural instrumentation tunneling-induced settlement issues. in British history. This massive monitoring effort helped make sure Our independent review, verification, and oversight of monitoring activity and data will give that dozens of London’s historic you confidence that Seattle Tunnel Partners’ monitoring is meeting contract requirements and landmarks remained undamaged is sufficient for the conditions at every stage of tunneling and excavation. It will also provide during tunneling. you the information you need to address any property damage issues that may arise.

30 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work 6. Deep Ground Improvement Techniques to Limit or Control Tunnel Construction Induced Movement Construction-induced movement is a major project risk, partly because of the challenging ground conditions (particularly near the portals) and partly because of the tunnel’s very large proposed diameter and the correspondingly large volume of soil removed. We have identified several locations and risk factors that will or could call for the use of ground improvement as a form of settlement mitigation. We consider the main risks to be: • Poor Soils: A combination of fill/poorly compacted, saturated soils and shallow cover to the tunnel crown at both ends of the tunnel, but particularly the south end. These areas are very likely to require ground improvement, probably in the form of grouting. • Tunnel Eyes: Both the launch and exit eyes at the portals are likely to require improvement, probably in the form of jet grouting. • Settlement of Existing Viaduct Columns and Foundations: As the tunnel bore passes beneath the viaduct (and at an angle), it is still relatively shallow and the superficial ground is poor, giving a risk of significant differential settlement and structural distortion. The viaduct itself is a vulnerable structure, already structurally impaired; consequently, compaction grouting, compensation grouting, and/or direct structural protection measures may be required in this area. • Downtown Structures and Buildings: Although the tunnel will be deep as it Compensation Grouting of a passes under the downtown core, its very large diameter means there remains a Building in Central London risk of measurable settlement. Moreover, variations in ground conditions and TBM performance mean that the volume loss is unlikely to be uniform along the drive. For A Wealth of Experience these reasons, ground improvement strategies to limit settlement may be considered. in Ground Improvement Techniques. Our team has Our team of engineers and inspectors is highly experienced in a wide variety of ground enormous experience is the use improvement methods, and has been responsible for overseeing their implementation on proj- of a wide range of techniques, ects all over the world. including compensation grouting, jet grouting and ground freezing. Methods used locally at the Brightwater and Sound Transit U-Link projects include: Deputy Resident Engineer Derek • Jet grouting for tunnel eyes. Dugan worked on the Singapore • Ground freezing for shaft excavation (200 feet deep). Deep Tunnel Sewerage System, • Ground freezing at depth for tunnel connection. where more than 40 shafts up to • Stone columns for improving bearing capacity for shallow foundations. 170 feet deep were successfully constructed using nitrogen ground freezing, jet grouting, compressed Consequently, our team has experience of implementing these ground improvement methods air, permeation grouting, and in the same range of local conditions likely to be found on this project. dewatering/recharge ground improvement methods. Anthony Pooley has experience with deep ground improvement and settlement control inter- nationally, both in Bangkok and particularly in London for the Jubilee Line Extension project (JLEP). At JLEP, he was closely involved in one of the largest-scale applications of compen- sation grouting ever undertaken, involving 20 separate grouting shafts and including grouting beneath the historic Big Ben Clock Tower. To manage the vast quantities of grouting data, he devised and implemented a method of estimating and back-analyzing grout intensities, based on predicted and actual grout injection patterns and observations of excavated grout horizons in the field.

Deputy Resident Engineer Derek Dugan worked on the Singapore Deep Tunnel Sewerage System where more than 40 shafts up to 170 feet deep were constructed using nitrogen ground freezing, jet grouting, compressed air, permeation grouting, and dewatering/recharge ground improvement methods.

For the SR 99 project, the use of such ground improvement methods will most likely involve one-time temporary works measures (such as tunnel eye jet grouting) and multiple appli- cations of compensation grouting (concurrent with tunnel advance), followed by retrospec- tive grouting to address possible ongoing ground movements after tunneling. Oversight of the one-time measures is relatively straightforward. We will review the contractor’s proposals and 31 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

make certain that they are implemented as proposed, then oversee and review any test coring or other tests carried out to verify the completed work.

The application of concurrent compensation grouting (if used) will require complete coor- dination with the advancing tunnel drive, and will therefore fall within the responsibili- ties of the Task Force overseeing the tunnel advance strategy, of which we are part. Planning the grouting will involve detailed review of the types of structures near the tunnel, the depth of the tunnel at that location, and monitoring process planning for the period of activity. Retrospective grouting would be planned and carried out based on the observed behavior of Ground Freezing. Grouting the ground and adjacent structures during and immediately after tunneling in that area. It may Inspector Bud Green has be necessary to undertake multiple episodes of retrospective grouting. experience with TBM annulus and contact grouting, contact Management of these processes will primarily be the responsibility of the contractor and their grouting, chemical grouting to designer. Independent review and oversight of such matters, including detailed independent limit water inflow and annulus data analysis, has repeatedly been shown to be a vital tool in reducing risk in complex proj- grouting of liners in tunnels. He is ects. We would provide that degree of oversight for you through a combination of Task Force currently overseeing the ground participation, submittal review, field inspection, and internal reporting on a basis to be defined freezing of a 350-foot-deep tunnel as part of your construction management plan. connection at Brightwater. 7. Deep, Below Ground Water Excavation and Support of Major Structures and Facilities The SR 99 Bored Tunnel Project involves the construction of major cut-and-cover excava- tions at each end of the tunnel, both of which are deep and have the potential to cause signif- icant displacement of ground and adjacent structures. Close oversight of the design and construction of these excavations will be of great importance in ensuring a safe project. Our team offers a wealth of worldwide experience designing and managing the construction of deep excavations below groundwater in some of the most complex urban environments imag- inable. We will add all of that experience to your team to oversee the two major excava- tions for the tunnel portals. We will also provide training to your inspectors, as needed, to enable them to participate in this element of the underground works. Overall, you will benefit from close oversight and reporting by a team with extensive experience in deep excavations, combined with training and new skills provided to your personnel, which will be retained after the project is completed. Worldwide Experience in Urban Deep Excavations in Our experience of deep excavations in Seattle is considerable and will benefit the whole Soft Ground. In addition to project team. On the Brightwater Project, our team reviewed contractors’ proposals and our firms’ experience of deep oversaw successful construction of numerous excavations for TBM launches and permanent excavations in Seattle, our underground structures, with depths up to 200 feet, including the following features: team members have worldwide • Slurry wall construction using clamshell and hydromill for TBM launch shafts. experience in deep excavation • Bulk excavation in water-filled excavations (to provide temporary stability), followed which is directly relevant to by placement of tremie slabs at depths of up to 100 feet. the SR 99 project. Ven Tseng • Construction of TBM recovery shaft using ground freezing. worked on the construction of • Use of jet grouting to stabilize the base of a sheet-piled temporary excavation. nine metro stations in Bangkok, • Use of caissons to launch and retrieve microtunneling machines. all located under busy roads and one under an existing elevated For Sound Transit’s U-Link Project, Jacobs and CH2M HILL recently oversaw the exca- road structure. The stations vation of deep pits immediately adjacent to I-5 to allow cutting of existing bored pile walls were successfully built in this to provide “windows” for TBMs to pass through. This project had very tight tolerances challenging urban setting using on allowable movements of I-5’s structures and pavement. Also for Sound Transit, we are slurry wall methods and top- down construction. currently overseeing the Capitol Hill and University of Washington station excavations using slurry wall and soldier piles/timber lagging methods.

In summary, we have a detailed understanding of the challenges of this type of work using a wide variety of methods, in urban environments, and in Seattle’s ground conditions. We will bring the benefit of this experience to the project to assist WSDOT in overseeing the SR 99 Project excavations. We will partner with Seattle Tunnel Partners and review their design

32 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

proposals and, based on our experience, make certain the major risks and technical challenges are appropriately mitigated. For the SR 99 portal excavations, we consider the main chal- lenges will be: South Portal • Large excavation size. • Addressing existing utilities (locating, protecting, and/or relocating). • Controlling lateral wall movements during excavation to minimize settlement around the excavation. • Risk of base heave during excavation. • Risk of viaduct ramp movement at north end of staging area. • Maintaining consistent build quality and wall alignment around such a long excavation, to make certain it is watertight (we expect that Seattle Tunnel Partners Westminster Station Excavation will probably use bored pile walls and incorporate them into the permanent works). • Possibility of archaeological finds in near-surface deposits and/or contaminated soils Cutting-edge Deep Excavation and obstructions to boring. Design and Construction Experience. Anthony Pooley North Portal carried out numerical analysis for • Working in relatively confined staging area with numerous adjacent structures. the design of Westminster Station • Risk of movement of adjacent structures during excavation. for London’s JLEP. At more than • Utilities management. 100 feet deep, it was the deepest Risk of base heave. open excavation ever in London, • located 40 feet from Big Ben, • Maintaining consistent build quality and alignment of slurry walls, to make certain it adjacent to the River Thames and is watertight. a historic bridge, and had a live • Possibility of archaeological finds in near-surface deposits and/or contaminated soils metro line running across the top and obstructions to boring. of the excavation (and supported • Multiple adjacent projects. by the excavation slurry walls) throughout construction. The We will pay particular attention to the proposed excavation sequence, measures to control excavation was constructed “top- quality, and plans for monitoring and mitigation of movement effects. Based on Seattle down.” Anthony was on site and Tunnel Partners’ plans, we will prepare an oversight program that will be aimed at verifying closely involved in excavation their compliance with the accepted design and construction methodology, and provide inde- oversight and geotechnical pendent review of the entire excavation process. monitoring throughout construction, and the station Our oversight will include: was completed without damage • Daily reports on construction activity. to adjacent structures. Anthony • Daily review of monitoring data. also carried out geotechnical design work and instrumentation • Participation in joint reviews with Seattle Tunnel Partners. monitoring oversight of the • Daily sketches of excavation progress, for correlating with observed movements. Bangkok Metro stations. • A complete daily photographic record of the excavation, utilizing predefined vantage points. • Ongoing comparison of the actual progress of the excavation with the planned excavation sequence.

8. Mitigation and Repair Procedures to Eliminate or Reduce Settlement of Adjacent Structures, Buildings, and Utilities The prevention and mitigation of settlement along the tunnel alignment is critical to the project. Any excessive movement or damage due to tunneling poses a significant risk in terms of cost and schedule, and would adversely affect public perception of what is already a controversial, high-profile project.

The Construction Monitoring Task Force will play a central role in overseeing and managing these processes. Your team must participate actively in this Task Force and provide a signif- icant amount of independent scrutiny and review of every aspect of the planning and imple- mentation of mitigation measures, because of the risks involved and the likely complex nature of the mitigation plan. 33 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

Our monitoring engineers will support you in providing the oversight required for settlement mitigation measures, attending all Task Force meetings and participating in key activities, including: • Attendance at selected condition surveys and reviewing all condition survey reports. • Detailed review and verification analysis (where necessary) of Seattle Tunnel Partners’ Deformation Analysis Report, which is required prior to construction. • Detailed review of all Seattle Tunnel Partners’ Action Plans and participating in/ overseeing development of these plans. • Participation in workshops prior to implementing Action Plans. • Field oversight of implementation of Action Plans. • Participation in retrospective reviews of the Action Plans.

Once Seattle Tunnel Partners’ detailed plans and procedures are in place, we will develop and implement a reporting process, providing appropriate levels of detail for you to send to the various levels of your management staff, so that the team is kept informed of progress in this key area on a regular basis.

9. System Integrator That Provides Oversight for Roadway and Tunnel Systems Expertise and Commissioning Efforts We recognize the foresight displayed by WSDOT in addressing system integration and commissioning early in the design-build process. Our experience has shown us the extraordi- nary value incorporating these concepts in the planning and design phases and implementing positive control through the construction and commissioning phases of the project. We have included Everett Engineers on our team to provide system integration expertise, based on their outstanding record of experience in this area.

Our general approach is to “Begin with the End in Mind.” From the start it is important to think about each unique system and how it is integrated into a project-wide compatible and Owner-usable system; not just individual components such as fans, pumps, environmental monitoring, fire protection, switchgear, etc. In the project’s early stages, we will provide our tunnel systems expertise through on-call engineering services to perform design, submittal and constructability reviews, respond to RFIs, and assist in the resolution of any design issues. We make sure that your operational requirements are driven into the design and veri- fied by proper commissioning (testing, startup, documentation, training, and turnover). Brightwater Influent Pump Station Shafts As part of the DOT’s Preliminary Design and Procurement Engineering Team for the LBJ Mobility Project in , Everett served as the Tunnel Systems Engineering Consultants Working as a Partner with and developed the Conceptual Design and Procurement Engineering Documents that resulted the Contractor. As part of the in a successful award of a Design-Build-Operate-Maintain-Finance project. This experi- Brightwater Project, Howard ence will be invaluable in coordinating with the many stakeholders of your project, such as Sawyer served as the Resident WSDOT, City of Seattle, emergency response agencies, STP, and other involved parties. Engineer of the extremely complex Influent Pump Station. The facility systems that will be installed are, for all intents and purposes, life safety systems During this time, Howard assisted the contractor to develop the and, as such, major involvement by numerous stakeholders is required to make certain their testing program for the Influent requirements are incorporated in STP’s design and construction activities. It is highly bene- Pump Station in Bothell. The ficial to scope systems with well-defined boundaries and then develop appropriate testing structure of the testing program procedures. Once each system has been installed, tested, and operates properly, each system is now in the beginning stages of must then be integrated into the project-wide monitoring and control system and systems implementation and applicable integration testing conducted. As part of our effort, we will assist WSDOT staff to directly portions are being utilized on oversee the construction of the tunnel and roadway systems to make certain these systems are other Brightwater Projects. safely built, tested (component and system), and commissioned per the approved design.

A specific example of the commissioning process can be illustrated by Everett’s experi- ence providing commissioning of the tunnel ventilation system on the Central Artery Tunnel Project in Boston. They made certain the tunnel ventilation system that was delivered was fully operational and compliant with all project requirements. To provide this, they:

34 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

• Thoroughly reviewed the design documents from the ventilation system as well as the interfacing systems such as variable frequency drives and motors, building structure, power sources, telemetry interfaces at each fan, and the human-machine- interface at the control center to fully understand the design intent and the how the ventilation system interfaced with these other systems. From this review they developed comments and resolved any “discontinuities” in the design. • Developed, assisted in the development, and witnessed the contractor’s testing programs that verified proper equipment operation. This testing included scale model prototype fan testing at a registered test lab, factory (at several manufacturing facilities around the country and in Mexico), and field and systems integration testing. - Field testing included receipt inspections, component testing of motors, variable frequency drives, local control and monitoring systems, including such things as cable continuity, fan belt/drive alignment, motor bumping and uncoupled runs, fan flow rates, and roadway ventilation duct pressure tests. - System integration testing operated the system in all design modes, balance the tunnel air flows, making certain the controls properly respond to various inputs. - Final acceptance testing simultaneously operated all systems required to maintain tunnel habitability and safety with the Owner and local emergency response authorities present so that requirements were satisfied to open the tunnel. • As part of the administrative turnover process, Everett: - Performed system and building walk downs with the Owner and contractor to assist in the substantial completion and turnover process. - Received and processed all required spare parts. - Made certain all warranties were received and in effect. - Made certain Owner personnel received the appropriate training to operate and maintain the equipment and systems. - Made certain all design changes were documented and tracked. This included capturing all changes to affected drawings and procedures so that documentation was “as-built.” - Made certain all permits were signed off and Certificates of Occupancies were obtained. - Developed, or assisted in the development of, Operations and Maintenance Manuals and Procedures.

This meticulous process makes certain that each and every system operates in accordance with design, and we are committed to this for the SR 99 Tunnel. Throughout this process, your Operations and Maintenance staff should be involved to make sure the systems and equipment meet the Owner’s operational requirements and the staff is familiar with the systems equipment prior to turnover.

10. Schedule and Claims Avoidance/Analysis In any construction contract, a detailed understanding of the contractor’s schedule is a vital element of effective construction management for tracking performance, making forecasts, assessing work completed for payment purposes, and analyzing work scenarios and construc- tion claims. It is also a powerful tool in risk management and claims mitigation and avoidance. We will provide experienced schedulers, cost estimators, and claims expertise to support your staff in managing the project schedule, costs, and budgets.

Schedule Engineer Ven Tseng has been our lead scheduler at Brightwater for the past four years, and brings the added perspective of his many years experience working for a major international contractor (Bilfinger Berger) as their Project Controls Manager in Southeast Asia, providing him with a valuable dual perspective. As discussed in our management approach, we will mobilize Ven early to take on the many early scheduling review tasks required by the design-build contract. Ven will work with Seattle Tunnel Partners as they develop their baseline schedule.

35 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

Our team also brings extensive experience of claims analysis and dispute resolution procedures, both locally and internationally, as described below. We understand the vital importance of extensive and well-kept records and data analysis in the review of claims, and in dealing with contractual disputes and will bring our experience to bear to help WSDOT manage any claims which may arise during the SR99 project. • Our key personnel (Anthony, Ven, Derek Dugan and Howard Sawyer) have all represented King County in a variety of non-binding DRB hearings throughout the Brightwater Project. Their participation has ranged from detailed data, cost, and schedule analysis to preparing and giving presentations to the DRBs at formal hearings. They have also participated in the regular visits to site and project reviews, typically made by the DRB for each contract every three months. They have all also participated in direct negotiations with contractors at Brightwater and on previous projects on change order requests, claims, and disputes. • Anthony Pooley successfully represented CERN in binding dispute resolution (adjudication) while managing the CNGS (Neutrino) project in Geneva, achieving a result completely supporting the Owner’s position. Anthony also successfully negotiated a series of changes involving a major realignment of one-third of the project tunnels and the addition of a new 400-foot-long connecting tunnel. • We have a great depth of on-call expertise to provide specialized support in claims as and when required. Lars Babendererde has extensive experience in providing specialist advice on tunnel-related claims all over the world. Our other on-call tunnel experts (see Exhibit 12, page 48) are also widely experienced in dealing with tunnel- related claims. In particular, Steve King of CH2M HILL is a recognized authority on the management and disposal of spoils in the Seattle area, and Matt Collins of Jacobs has a track record in specialized claims consulting in the Seattle area. • Cost Estimator Russell Podmayer has 25 years of construction experience, including extensive structural work in and around Seattle. For the past year, he has been estimating at Brightwater, where Jacobs has carried out extensive program-level Spoils Disposal is Critical. estimating and ongoing costing of all changes and claims throughout the project for Management of spoils is all tunnel contracts. Anthony also brings hands-on tunnel cost estimating experience, important to moving the project having carried out 90% and Engineer’s program-level estimates for the Brightwater forward, since the amount of East and Central contracts. We will be able to provide cost estimating support at short dirt that will be removed during notice as you require throughout the project. construction could cover the playing surface at Qwest Field to a height of 473 feet. Scheduling We will identify all of the critical internal and external schedule interfaces and “pinch-points,” tracking them as work progresses and reporting them as you require. We will also maintain a set of scenarios for various critical schedule elements, enabling us to forecast the potential conse- quences of a variety of possible schedule events and their effects elsewhere in the program. Additionally, we will prepare a “geographic schedule” (Exhibit 6, next page), a time-station representation of the entire project, which clearly identifies all of the critical schedule elements, milestones, and interfaces, and displays them in a single diagram that allows the viewer to develop an intuitive understanding of how the project activities fit together.

Claims Our approach to supporting you in addressing claims will be as follows: 1. Claims Avoidance: We will work throughout the design and construction planning phases to identify potential claim risks in Seattle Tunnel Partners’ technical proposals and schedule. We will use that knowledge to work to reduce the risk by working with WSDOT and Seattle Tunnel Partners, and by developing appropriate risk registers and risk mitigation strategies ahead of construction. These strategies may include scoping out workarounds for potential issues and constructability reviews. 2. Claims Mitigation: We will use the strategies developed during design and construction planning to mitigate the effects of potential claims. We will keep detailed records of issues that may generate or have generated claims. Our field personnel will be briefed on these issues so that they are able to document such

36 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

Exhibit 5 - Geographic issues in detail if they develop. Our schedule reviews (page 37, Scheduling) will seek Schedule. This powerful to identify ways in which developing commercial issues can be mitigated through diagramming technique captures schedule modifications, and we will work with Seattle Tunnel Partners and WSDOT the key schedule activities and to try and implement such changes for the benefit of the project. all critical interfaces in a single 3. Claims Analysis: For established claims, we will continue to monitor any ongoing diagram. and developing issues in the field. We will collect and analyze data and costs as needed to provide clear recommendations to you on strategies for managing and negotiating each claim. This will include making projections as to the likely costs associated with ongoing issues. In these cases we will draw on our extensive on-call expertise as you require.

Our guiding principle is that where a contractor has entitlement, a settlement should be agreed to as soon as possible and a change drafted. Equally, where entitlement is not obvious, we will be ready to negotiate with Seattle Tunnel Partners alongside you in your best interest, and our detailed records and reporting will strongly support that effort. We will do so in the knowl- edge that all claims and disputes are best dealt with promptly and effectively, and do not improve with age.

Cost Monitoring/Cost Estimating We will track and project ongoing construction costs based on Seattle Tunnel Partners’ prog- ress, their cost-loaded schedule, and current ongoing commercial issues. We will report on an agreed frequency as you require, to be decided during development of the construction management plan.

Our cost estimator will also provide estimates of costs associated with claims, and will review costs submitted by Seattle Tunnel Partners to provide you the data you need to successfully negotiate settlements to such issues. 37 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work 11. Underground Safety Program Expertise Our Commitment to Safety is You have placed a safe project at the top of your list of goals for this project. The Jacobs/ Total CH2M HILL Team is committed to achieving that goal, and will mobilize a team that has Safety Manager Connie Krier first-hand local experience developing, implementing, and managing underground safety is currently the CM Safety programs for the Brightwater and U-Link projects, and for projects around the world. This Manager for the Brightwater experience means that we are familiar with the challenges of a safety program for a major project. Prior to joining Jacobs project in Washington state involving compressed air TBM work, with the regulations that she worked at Washington will govern the management of safety for the project, and with the range of safety challenges Labor & Industries, giving her a likely to face a major tunnel project, regardless of location. You will also have the full support valuable perspective and insight of our combined organizations; and we will work to keep our employees, your staff, Seattle into the workings of local regu- Tunnel Partners’ team members, and the public safe at all times. latory agencies. Our approach to managing and overseeing safety for the SR 99 project will be governed by the aim of seeing practical safety programs for both Seattle Tunnel Partners and WSDOT established at an early stage for the benefit of the whole project. Our approach to safety will be to maintain two core principles throughout the project: • Safety is not primarily about numbers and costs – it is first and foremost about people. Thinking about safety matters in terms of people leads to a very different, more committed approach than thinking about it as a business variable. • Safety is at the heart of everything we do. Safety is not to be regarded as an “add- on,” an afterthought, or a box to be ticked. It is always a central consideration in every project aspect.

Our experience shows that management leadership in safety matters is essential for success. Management must buy into, promote, and enforce the safety program. It must recognize effec- tive safety performance and visibly support the personnel responsible for safety management and oversight. We will work with you with the aim of promoting such a culture and leadership for the project. Our practical approach can be summarized as follows: • From the outset, work with Seattle Tunnel Partners on the development of their safety program. • Work on developing a safety program for your team that echoes and supplements Seattle Tunnel Partners’ program. • Once safety programs are established, promote them and monitor them by an appropriate mix of oversight, reporting, training, and dissemination of information throughout the project. Example of a Tunnel Rescue Team training exercise. Development of Seattle Tunnel Partners’ Safety Program The Proof is in the Numbers. As Seattle Tunnel Partners develops its safety program, we will collaborate and review their To date at Brightwater, our proposals to verify that they meet project and regulatory requirements. This early activity construction management team is important because it provides a key opportunity to directly and positively influence their has put in more than 380,000 approach to safety and to “set a tone” for the project. After the program is accepted and man-hours on the project, and implemented, the focus is more on verifying compliance with the program and holding the our personal injury rate is only contractor to that standard. We will scrutinize Seattle Tunnel Partners’ proposals in detail and 1.05. Our DART (days away aim to offer contributions and suggestions that lead to a practical, workable safety program restricted or transfer) is at zero. that will benefit the project as a whole. We achieved this by promoting a culture where safety is the top Development of WSDOT’s Safety Program priority in everything we do, We will work with you to develop a safety program for your team in parallel with develop- combined with a strong safety ment of Seattle Tunnel Partners’ program. For practical reasons, your program should echo leadership, an extensive training the Seattle Tunnel Partners program as much as possible, and be supplemented with content to program, and strict adherence to meet your specific needs. We will also develop and commence rollout of your safety training PPE requirements. program, which is discussed in more detail in our Management Approach.

38 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work Oversight, Reporting, Training, and Information Once the safety programs are established, we will develop appropriate tools for monitoring and overseeing Seattle Tunnel Partners’ performance in relation to its accepted safety program, and we will establish a reporting program. We will discuss Seattle Tunnel Partners’ safety performance with them on a regular basis. As construction proceeds, Seattle Tunnel Partners will submit specific safety proposals for various construction activities. These will be reviewed for compliance with project requirements, local regulations, and Seattle Tunnel Partners’ safety program. Once established, your field personnel will be briefed on safety arrangements so they are able to verify implementation of the safety proposals in the field. Field inspectors will be Tunnel Rescue Team Training trained to observe and report on safety aspects, rather than leaving everything to Field Safety Officers. We will promote the idea that safety is everyone’s job. Exercise. Our U-Link team is working with the Seattle Fire Department to develop tunnel We will establish a “Safety Observation Report” system for use by anyone on the project, rescue plans for the project. We but primarily field personnel. This simple system will provide a means of reporting safe and will use this experience to help unsafe behaviors, enabling trends in behavior to be identified before they cause incidents. you, Seattle Tunnel Partners, and Seattle Fire Department develop We will work with you to establish a reporting regime that provides appropriate amounts of similar plans for the SR 99 project. information regarding safety matters and performance at an agreed frequency to various levels of management. We will also promote the idea of setting up a simple method of distributing and promoting important safety information to all personnel on a regular basis, with the aim of keeping everyone focused on safety throughout the project.

We expect that safety training will be an ongoing process throughout the project, so we will establish a means of recording and tracking safety training for your team. For example, at Brightwater we achieved this by creating a rigorous web-based safety training record system as part of the project management software, giving personnel one-click access to their own safety training records.

We would also recommend the establishment of some form of simple safety incentive and recognition program within your team, recognizing excellence in safety behavior and perfor- mance for individuals, and for the team as a whole.

MANAGEMENT APPROACH Our Management Approach is built around assisting WSDOT in delivery of the SR 99 Bored Tunnel project safely, on schedule, within budget, and to the highest quality. We will support you in your strong owner role by integrating fully into your construction management team, Safety is Everyone’s creating a team to manage the detailed design and construction phases of the project that: Responsibility. From regular • Leverages current best practices and experience of your team from the preliminary stand down meetings to our design and procurement, which are relevant to the construction phase. comprehensive training program, • Adds best practices and lessons learned from our own extensive experience safety will be at the forefront managing tunnel construction projects locally and internationally. of everything we do, and each • Organizes itself to work collaboratively with Seattle Tunnel Partners as envisioned employee will be responsible by the design-build contract, for the whole project’s benefit. not just for themselves, but for personnel working beside, We recognize that despite the many advantages of a design-build approach, one of its poten- above, and below them. tial limitations is that the designer is no longer necessarily an advocate for the Owner, which Everyone should go home safe results in the Construction Management team having a key role in protecting the Owner’s and sound every day. interests. For this reason it is vital to have construction management support that clearly understands the roles of designer, contractor and construction manager in a high risk design- build project of this type, and operates effectively in the construction management support role, while also having the necessary experience to advocate for you on a range of technical and contractual issues.

In carrying out the construction management services, we will focus specifically on achieving the scope elements described in the RFQ. Additionally we will bring extensive valuable expe-

39 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

rience of construction management and design of tunnel projects (including design-build proj- ects) to the integrated team and will strive to add value to the work of the team as broadly as possible. We will work with you to produce a comprehensive, practical plan to manage the design-build contract in a way that maximizes cooperation with Seattle Tunnel Partners, while also protecting your interests and moving towards achieving your project goals.

In the following sections we focus on four aspects of our management approach for this project: • Core principles for managing the SR 99 Bored Tunnel construction management services. • Detailed proposals and staff mobilization schedule for the Phase 1 services. • Outline proposals for the Phase 2 services, focusing on level of effort required. • Added value propositions: areas outside the basic Scope of Work where our experience and best practices can add value to your management effort.

Core Management Principles Our management approach will be guided by the following core principles, all of which are aimed at supporting you in successfully achieving your project goals: 1. Safety is our Number 1 priority. 2. We will form a seamless, integrated team with WSDOT. 3. We will make maximum use of your personnel. 4. We will add value at all times. 5. We will implement proven tools and processes that strengthen the construction management effort.

In the following sections, we describe these principles in more detail, giving examples of how this will provide value to you.

1. Safety is Our No. 1 Priority: Our organizations and our team believe deeply that a culture recognizing the safety of project personnel and the public as a paramount consideration is essential to a successful project. We are excited that you have placed the delivery of a safe project at the top of your list of project goals. We will bring our safety culture to the project, together with our industry-leading and innovative safety practices, and will actively seek to promote and support a project culture that strives for the highest safety standards from all project participants. Key best practices that we used at Brightwater and would propose to bring to this project include: - An extensive safety training program. - A web-based safety training database, with each team member having easy access to their own training record. - Safety Observation Reports, which are part of a simple, easy-to-manage reporting system that tracks safe and unsafe behaviors, enabling trends to be identified and addressed before they develop into incidents.

2. A Seamless, Integrated Team: Under your direction, we will operate with your personnel and other consultants as part of single, integrated team committed to delivering the SR 99 Project successfully and to achieving your project goals. We understand that the primary role of the construction management consultant is to provide technical support and advice to your management team and to be a part of Adding Skills to the Owner’s that team. This is similar to the way we have operated at Brightwater and Sound Team Transit U-Link. At Brightwater, we integrated King County inspectors into 3. Maximize Use of WSDOT Personnel: We will work with you to identify areas our tunnel inspection team and where your personnel can be trained to work with our specialized staff to maximize provided training to all King the use of your existing resources and provide long-term benefit in the form of skills County project personnel in that will remain within WSDOT after the project is completed. We will identify and safety and use of web-based suggest areas where we can provide on-the-job training to your personnel, focusing project management systems. initially on working underground and tunnel safety.

40 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

4. Add Value At All Times: We will always implement ways to lessen the burden on your staff, using our past experience and lessons learned to add efficiencies to the program and save you time and money on this important project. In the following sections we describe in detail how our approach to the project will add value to your construction management effort.

5. Use Proven Tools and Processes: Our organizations have a range of management and software tools and well-defined management processes that have been widely used on tunnel construction projects throughout the world. Where appropriate, we will deploy these tools to improve efficiency and deliver quality for your construction management effort. In other areas, we will take our existing best practices and lessons learned and use them to fully leverage the existing tools and processes currently deployed within your team.

Phase 1 Services Our approach to Phase 1 services will be to initially mobilize a small number of key personnel Exhibit 6. Phase 1 Organization to carry out critical tasks, such as preliminary schedule review and management and safety Chart planning. These personnel will be experienced in all aspects of the management of tunnel construction projects and will be well- Washington State equipped to support you in formulating Department of Transportation Linea Laird, PE a management plan to oversee the Project Manager Project Principal construction. Don Nelson, PE 1 The people included in our initial mobi- Internal Reporting lization are highly skilled and experi- Bored Tunnel & enced, both technically and manageri- TBM Group ally, in the design and construction of Pat McCormick, PE Resident Engineer (WSDOT) tunnels, so they will have a strong and Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. 1 positive influence on many of the proj- (Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team) ect’s key early activities.

Safety Manager Deputy Resident We expect discussions with you Connie Krier, CSS 1 Engineer - Tunnel regarding staffing levels to be one Derek Dugan 2 of the first activities in the Phase 1 services. Further staff will be mobi- lized, as required, based on this plan- Deformation ning. Since most of our team is already Management Group located in Seattle, we can respond David Sowers, PE Monitoring/ (WSDOT) Instrumentation Engineer quickly and efficiently to project needs DonaldXXX Olson, PE 2 as they arise, and at a lower cost.

Contract Administration Our organization chart for Phase 1 Group (Exhibit 6), illustrates how our team Brian Nielsen, PE Schedule/Cost Cost Estimator members will integrate fully into your (WSDOT) Engineer Russell Podmayer, PE 1 team from the outset. This approach 1 Ven Tseng, PE will be continued in Phase 2.

Staff Mobilization and Design Manager Responsibilities Susan Everett, PE Tunnel Systems We will mobilize our team on Day 1 (WSDOT) Integrator 4 to help get the project off in the right Howard Sawyer direction. More information about this mobilization is summarized below and Legend a detailed task breakdown for each team 1 Jacobs 2 CH2M HILL 3 Babendererde Engineers 4 Everett Engineers 5 UrbanTech Systems (DBE) member is included in Exhibit 7 on the next page:

41 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

Exhibit 7. Phase 1 Services Staff Mobilization Details and Responsibilities

Name/Role Mobilization Chronology (% Commitment) Responsibilities Comments Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. • Staff planning for Phases 1 and 2 (with WSDOT) • Development of the CM plan Resident Engineer • Development and drafting of CM plan will be a key early activity for • Participation in early development of monitoring plans and task force your team. It requires broad March 2011 • Participation in risk management workshops and planning management capability and (100%) • Prepare monthly project status report experience and needs to be • Participate in tool box meetings completed before NTP 2. • Support of ongoing environmental approval processes • Participation in partnering Ven Tseng, PE • Review of preliminary 90-day look-ahead schedule • Depending on level of cost Schedule Engineer • Participation in baseline schedule development analysis required, we may • Review baseline and monthly update schedules also propose the mobilization March 2011 • Review project costs and trends of a cost estimator on a part- (100%) • Cost and schedule reporting time basis. • Participation in risk management workshops and planning • Participation in partnering Connie Krier, CSS • Independent review of contractor safety program • Early involvement in devel- Safety Engineer • Development of your team safety plan opment of the contractor’s • Development and implementation of your team safety training safety program is a critical March-April 2011 program opportunity to “set a tone” (100%) • Development of safety training record system and positively influence the • Attendance at toolbox meetings as required safety culture of the entire • Participation in partnering project from Day 1. Derek Dugan • Participate in development of tunneling plan • Derek will split his time initially Deputy Resident Engineer • Review tunneling submittals and coordinate review inputs of on-call to enable him to close out his experts Brightwater commitments. April 2011 (50%) • Preparation of training plan for underground inspectors June-July 2011 (100%) Howard Sawyer • Participate in Tunnel Commissioning task Force • Howard will split his time Tunnel Systems Integrator • Review of tunnel systems design submittals initially to enable him to • Coordinate design reviews of on-call experts and third parties close out his Brightwater June 2011 commitments. (50%) Donald Olson, PE • Participate in monitoring task force Instrumentation Engineer • Lead for monitoring review and reporting July 2011 (100%) Bob Everett • Review of systems design submittals • These individuals are expected Lars Babendererde • Review of TBM submittals and factory visits to be used during Phase 1, Igor Maevski • Review of ventilation design submittals based on current information. Carl Neagoy • Review of TBM design submittals Other on-call expertise can Roger Johnson • Review of TBM design submittals be provided if and when On-Call Expertise required. As needed Notes: 1.Assume Design-Build NTP 1 date of 01/31/2011. 2.Assume start of Phase 1 services in March 2011. 3.All staff committed 100% during Phase 1 unless indicated otherwise. 4.All mobilizations subject to agreement with you at start of Phase 1.

42 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

Exhibit 8. Safety Training Program Content Outline • Key Early Mobilizations: We propose to mobilize Anthony Pooley and Schedule Engineer Ven Tseng Personnel immediately to handle early tasks, such as construction management planning, schedule development/review, and agreeing to a staffing plan with you. Anthony’s experience Training Course Frequency Office Field Tunnel Safety will allow him to take the lead in early planning for Office Safety Annually ü ü ü ü geotechnical and structural monitoring and to participate Defensive Driving Annually ü ü ü ü in the monitoring task force; he will hand over that role in Summer 2011 to a full-time Monitoring Engineer. Project Orientation Upon joining project 1 ü ü ü ü • Construction Management Plan Development: HAZCOM Annually ü ü ü ü Development of the construction management plan with you will be a vital step in setting the standards for your First Aid/CPR/AED 2 yearly Voluntary team’s performance for the remainder of the project. Safety Observation 2 Annually ü ü ü ü It is important that the plan produced is practical and achievable so that it can be used as a management tool, Fire & Earthquake Drills Annually ü ü ü ü rather than “gathering dust” while workable management OSHA 10 3 3 yearly ü ü ü procedures evolve haphazardly. Our team will bring lessons learned from the Brightwater and U-Link projects Contractor Site As needed ü ü ü to benefit WSDOT in this task. Orientations • Task Force Planning: One of the important focuses of WSDOT Site Orientation 4 Upon joining project ü ü ü construction management planning will be defining how Heat Stress Training Annually ü ü ü you interact with Seattle Tunnel Partners. The contract foresees the use of task forces and defines a large number Fall Protection As needed ü ü ü of them, many of which commence very early in the Confined Spaces As conditions dictate ü ü ü project. It is likely that Seattle Tunnel Partners will want to discuss the number and composition of task forces, Crane Hazard Awareness 2 yearly ü ü ü and may suggest combining some of them (such as the HAZMAT 5 Annually ü ü ü ground improvement and monitoring task forces, which are strongly interlinked). We will work with you and Tunnel Safety Orientation Upon joining project ü ü Seattle Tunnel Partners to define a manageable task force Self-rescuer Training Quarterly ü ü regime in terms of number, scope, frequency of meetings, reporting, and follow-up actions to maximize their benefit Tunnel Evacuation Training Quarterly ü ü for all concerned. Compressed Air Training As needed ü ü • STP Safety Program Development: Safety Engineer

6 Connie Krier will be mobilized approximately one SHAFT 40-hour Training Upon joining project ü month after Anthony and Ven to review and collaborative Tunnel Rescue Team Coordinate with Fire ü discussions regarding Seattle Tunnel Partners’ safety Training 7 Department program. This important period is where you can have Traffic Control (MUTCD 3 yearly ü direct influence over the content of Seattle Tunnel Flagger Card) Partners’ safety program, helping to define the safety culture for the project. OSHA 500 3 yearly ü • WSDOT Safety Program Development: Connie will Notes: simultaneously work on a safety program for your team, 1.Site orientations can be repeated if major site changes. which will be coordinated with the contractor’s program. 2.Safety Observation training teaches people to report safe or unsafe She will also define and commence implementation of behaviors as a way of tracking tends in behavior before they lead to a safety orientation and training program for your team. accidents. A summary of a typical suggested training program is 3.OSHA 10 training to include introduction to DOSH for clarification included as Exhibit 8. on Washington state differences in codes. • Baseline Schedule Development: Baseline schedule 4.Include any elements not covered by contractor orientation. development will also be a vital early activity. Ven Tseng 5.HAZMAT training required if contaminated materials expected (e.g., brings 27 years of experience as both a contractor and a in deep excavations). consultant to this task. He has also been responsible for 6.Training by Northwest Laborers Training Trust (www.nwlett.org) – detailed schedule reviews for the Brightwater project, and covers several tunnel-specific items listed in the exhibit above. developed a widely-praised “time-station” chart, which 7.In coordination with Seattle Fire Department. showed on one sheet all of the key schedule activities and interfaces for the project, and was used extensively as a planning tool. 43 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

Exhibit 9. Summary of Inspector Training for Tunnel Inspectors Category Content Comments Safety • Site safety orientation • See also safety training program • Tunnel safety orientation summary • Safety observations in the field and how to record them Tunnel Practice • Working in a tunnel • Entering and leaving a tunnel/moving in a tunnel • Equipment and self-rescue device Specs and Other • Tunnel specifications • Inspectors will attend a weekly Documentation • Relevant submittals meeting to discuss progress, • The tunnel excavation plan (and why it has to be followed and monitored) quality, safety observations and • Examination of relevant, significant risk register items forthcoming week’s work TBM Operation • Expected geology and ground behavior • Critical TBM parameters to watch, and what they mean • Thorough understanding of soil tonnage and grout, and what causes sinkholes • Basics of muck conditioning • Understanding contractor’s daily TBM operating parameters and identi- fying when a change is made • Spatial awareness 1 • Understanding ring building, ring selection & orientation of taper rings • Ring build inspection • Soil sampling practice • TBM steering/alignment fundamentals and tolerances 2 Reporting and • Details for reporting and report style • Inspectors need to understand Record Keeping • Photography: how to take good tunnel pictures and how to log them in the importance of their records from database a quality and (potentially) a • Fundamentals of TBM data management software commercial standpoint In-tunnel • New inspector works in-tunnel with an experienced “buddy” inspector for • We used a similar orientation Orientation Period minimum of 10 shifts, or until buddy confirms that new inspector is ready to period for new tunnel inspectors work independently at Brightwater. Notes: 1.Inspector should know the tunnel • Tunnel Excavation Planning: We propose to mobilize Deputy Resident Engineer alignment from the surface and un- Derek Dugan in April 2011, starting at 50% time commitment, rising to full time in derstand where the TBM is relative the summer of 2011. It is likely that a significant amount of effort associated with to the surface at all times. tunnel planning will begin around this time. The tunnel excavation remains a cutting 2.For a transport tunnel, alignment edge undertaking. The risks associated with it cannot be underestimated and we, tolerances and ring build quality therefore, recommend a dedicated team member for this work. Derek will also use are more critical than for, say, a this period to define a training program for underground works (deep excavation and sewer tunnel. tunnel) for your inspectors, to be implemented during Phase 2. An example program is presented in outline in Exhibit 9 (above), based on our experience training tunnel inspectors on other projects. • Systems Design Review: Tunnel Systems Integrator Howard Sawyer will join the project at a 50% time commitment in the summer of 2011, participating in design reviews, coordinating external reviews, and working on the Commissioning and possibly the Tunnel Systems Allocation task forces, expected to commence work during the NTP 1 period. Howard will join the team full time during Phase 2, or earlier if necessary.

Our Phase 1 team will be supported by on-call expertise (Exhibit 12, page 48) as required, particularly systems design submittal review, TBM design submittal review, and factory visits.

Our key Phase 1 personnel (Anthony, Ven, Derek and Connie, and others if required) will participate positively in partnering in whatever form is organized for the project. Partnering can play a valuable role in the project, if approached realistically. Used effectively, partnering can: 44 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

• Help establish shared goals and agreement on ways of achieving those goals. • Strengthen Owner-Contractor collaboration in areas of shared interests. • Facilitate non-confrontational discussion in areas of divergent interests. • Help establish and maintain a positive, civilized, and effective tone to Owner- Contractor dialog and relationships during disputes and/or discussion of difficult project issues.

Deliverables We will work with you during the initial phases of Stage 1 to define a detailed list of deliver- ables, based on the summary list included in the RFQ. Each deliverable will be provided in both hard copy and electronic format (normally PDF). Additionally, we will seek to agree in more detail on the content of each deliverable item in advance so that expectations are clearly defined and understood. Deliverables will meet project needs, and will also be consistent with the State Construction Manual and the Construction Management Plan.

Phase 2 Services This section describes, in outline form, our proposed services for Phase 2, which focus on the construction period of 2012 onwards. The proposals are presented in outline only because the Exhibit 10. Phase 2 Organization nature of the services to be provided will depend to some extent on the way in which Seattle Chart Tunnel Partners organizes itself and ongoing development of the WSDOT team.

Washington State Department of Transportation Linea Laird, PE Project Manager Project Principal Don Nelson, PE 1

Internal Reporting Bored Tunnel & TBM Group Pat McCormick, PE Resident Engineer (WSDOT) Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. 1 (Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team)

Safety Manager Tunnel Systems Deputy Resident Document Management, Off-site & Special Connie Krier, CSS 1 Oversight/Integration Engineer - Tunnel Internal Audits Inspection (as required) Howard Sawyer 4 Derek Dugan 2 Edward Hamm 1 Jacobs/CH2M HILL Field Safety Officer TBD (WSDOT or CM) Systems Inspector Document Controller TBD (WSDOT or CM)* TBD (WSDOT or CM) Field Safety Officer TBD (WSDOT or CM) Systems Inspector TBD (WSDOT or CM)* Assistant RE - Assistant RE - Tunnels Interior Structures Philipp Elsner 3 TBD (WSDOT or CM) Deformation Management Group Chief Tunnel Inspector Structural Inspector David Sowers, PE Roger Johnson 2 TBD (WSDOT or CM) (WSDOT) Structural Inspector Tunnel Inspectors TBD (WSDOT or CM) Monitoring/ Monitoring/ Clifford Feurtado 2 Instrumentation Engineer Instrumentation Engineer Matt Fagan 1 Donald Olson, PE 2 Christian Hahn 3 Carl Neagoy 1 WSDOT Tunnel Inspectors Grouting Inspector Grouting Inspector Trained by CM Team Larry (Bud) Green 1 Marvin Jensen 5

Contract Administration Group Brian Nielsen, PE Schedule/Cost Scheduler Cost Estimator (WSDOT) Engineer Brad Rollings 1 Russell Podmayer, PE 1 Ven Tseng, PE 1

Assumptions: Design Manager 1. Field work is carried out in two shifts per day, five or six days per week. Susan Everett, PE Tunnel Systems 2. CM staff are fully integrated into WSDOT team. Anthony Pooley acts (WSDOT) Consultant as “point of contact” for CM personnel requirements and issues. Bob Everett, PE, LEED 4 3. For Phase 2, staff will be mobilized based on construction schedule, and will be full time once mobilized.

Legend Notes: 1 Jacobs 2 CH2M HILL 3 Babendererde Engineers * Requirements for mechanical, systems, electrical, and other systems- 4 Everett Engineers 5 UrbanTech Systems (DBE) related inspection to be decided during Phase 1.

45 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

In outlining this approach we make several general assumptions: • Construction of early elements of the project (e.g., the south tunnel portal) will proceed in parallel with the design of other elements to be constructed later, so that construction oversight and design review actually proceed together for some time. • Construction work will typically be carried out in 2 shifts, 5 or 6 days a week. • Inspections will be carried out by a combined team of construction management consultant personnel and your personnel, to be trained by our team. The distribution of staff will be agreed to with you during Phase 1 services. • The primary purpose of inspection is “Quality Verification,” to verify that Seattle Tunnel Partners is meeting your requirements and is following their accepted construction design and methods safely and to the required quality. Additionally, inspection will provide an independent review to supplement the contractor’s own internal inspection arrangements.

Our Phase 2 organization chart (Exhibit 10, previous page) identifies our construction management personnel and shows your team leads to whom we report (based on the organiza- tion chart provided by you). The chart also identifies positions that could potentially be filled by either your trained inspectors or consultant construction management personnel.

While the detailed project schedule is not known at this time, we have made an estimate of the Exhibit 11. Phase 2 Mobilization likely mobilization schedule for these personnel, shown in Exhibit 11. Schedule Based on the scope described in the RFQ, it is apparent that almost all of the Dates Personnel services required in Phase 1 will continue into Phase 2 – in some cases at a higher March 2011 2 level of activity. Additionally, the Resident Engineering and Inspection operation (the RE Team) will ramp up to full scale during Phase 2. Our proposed organiza- April - May 2011 4 tion, therefore, expands the team established in Phase 1 to meet these needs. June - November 2011 6 Ongoing Services from Phase 1 December 2011 - January 2012 12 While the design review services are likely to decrease over time, they will February - March 2012 15 continue into Phase 2, particularly in the systems disciplines. For this reason, we are showing Howard Sawyer as having a dual role – coordinating ongoing design March 2012 - December 2014 17 reviews and managing systems oversight and inspection during Phase 2. January - June 2015 9 We expect that cost and scheduling work will increase sharply during Phase 2. July - December 2015 4 Consequently, we show Ven Tseng supported by a full-time cost estimator and an additional scheduler for Phase 2. This will allow Ven to work on a broader range of issues, including any claims and change orders. Although we have not shown additional staff to address claims and changes on the organization chart, this may be necessary if the number of changes becomes significant.

The Monitoring Engineer mobilized in Phase 1 continues into Phase 2 and is augmented by a second person in this role. The level of monitoring activity is likely to rise sharply in Phase 2 and, given the multi-shift nature of the work, we expect that two people will be required to provide full coverage and adequate review and reporting capacity.

Safety Engineer Connie Krier will continue to carry out her duties in Phase 2. Additionally we recommend that two field safety officers be added to the team for oversight of field opera- tions. Two persons should be able to provide coverage of most major activities and sites. We are able to provide suitable personnel, or your personnel could be trained to fill these roles.

Anthony Pooley and Derek Dugan will continue in their Phase 1 roles.

46 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work RE and Inspection Services The most significant additions to the team for Phase 2 will be inspection staff. We expect the oversight operation to require the following personnel: • Two grouting inspectors to cover ground treatment operations (one of these is shown as potentially one of your trained inspectors). • An Assistant RE-Tunnels, Philipp Elsner, who will share the management of the tunnel inspection operation with Derek Dugan, and have particular responsibility for managing, maintaining, and reporting digital TBM data. He will participate in task force meetings associated with tunnel excavation control and monitoring. • For tunnel inspection, we will mobilize Chief Tunnel Inspector Roger Johnson, supervising a team of at least four other tunnel inspectors. The exact number of inspectors depends upon the Seattle Tunnel Partners’ shift patterns. In general, we would aim to have one inspector on the TBM and one at the south portal during all tunneling operations. • An Assistant RE-Interior Structures position could be filled by our team, or one of your employees. We consider it highly likely that STP will build the interior structures close behind the TBM. For this reason it is not desirable to separate the oversight of the interior structures from that of the tunnel, and we have shown this group as part of the tunnel team. • At least two Interior Structures Inspectors will be required to oversee this work, depending upon the contractor’s work patterns. These inspectors could be either WSDOT personnel or our team’s staff. • For Systems Oversight Inspection, we recognize that a significant effort will be required to oversee the installation of tunnel systems and the construction and fit-out of tunnel control buildings. There is no detailed scope description for this in the RFQ, but the Q&A issued indicates that you will require support in this area. We have, therefore, shown a placeholder for inspectors and expect that staffing requirements will be discussed with you as the work proceeds. These inspectors would probably be a mix of our team and your staff, supervised by Howard Sawyer.

We have also added two Document Control roles to the team for Phase 2, as the RE and Inspection team will generate a very large amount of records and reports, all of which must be managed, stored, distributed, and archived. Additionally, we expect large numbers of record photographs to be taken and propose that these be managed with a dedicated database, which will also require the expertise of a Document Management specialist. For this reason, we have shown Edward Hamm leading our document control task, with additional responsibility for internal auditing activity. Ed would be supported by a second Document Controller, who could be either a WSDOT employee or one of our team members.

The precise tasks assigned to the team will be identified as part of preparing the Construction Management Plan in Phase 1. However, given the scale of the project and the quantity of information to be managed, we consider that the size of team shown is appropriate for carrying out the work involved, to a high quality standard.

On-Call Expertise Our core team will be backed up throughout the project by significant expertise in several key areas, ranging from mechanized tunneling to claims analysis. Exhibit 12 (following page) shows the key experts we will have available as needed to meet short-term needs and provide expert advice.

Deliverables During Phase 2 we will continue to provide the deliverables defined in Phase 1, adding addi- tional items to meet the requirements of Phase 2 and to provide comprehensive construction records. We will propose a scope for a construction record set as part of our Phase 1 activities.

47 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

Exhibit 12. Available On-call Expertise Name Firm Location Qualifications Pressurized Face Tunneling Lars Babendererde Babendererde Germany Large Diameter TBMs: Leading expertise in large diameter TBM technology and hyper- baric interventions Paul Gasson CH2M HILL Seattle TBM Tunneling and Construction Management: Currently Project Manager for U-Link CM Nick Chen Jacobs Boston Tunnel Design and Construction: Currently lead tunnel designer on Port of Miami Tunnel (41-foot diameter) Steve Hunt CH2M HILL Milwaukee Tunnel Design: Geotechnical background with soft-ground tunnel experience. Angus Speirs Jacobs Seattle Tunnel CM: Supervised Dragados on tunnel contract at CERN, Geneva. Currently Resident Engineer on U-Link U-230 contract Mike Doleac CH2M HILL Seattle Tunnel construction and construction management John Critchfield Jacobs Seattle Tunnel CM: Currently Project Manager for Brightwater CM Building Protection Jim Schettler Jacobs Seattle Structures: Worked on preliminary design of AWV project Environmental Issues Steve King CH2M HILL Seattle Spoils Disposal Issues: Extensive experience in spoil disposal issues, particularly on the SEA-TAC Third Runway project Cos Roberts UrbanTech Seattle Environmental Compliance: Oversight at Brightwater since 2006 Tunnel Systems Bob Everett Everett Eng. Boston Provided startup testing, commissioning, turnover, and documentation of tunnel systems equipment for Boston’s Central Artery Tunnel Igor Maevski Jacobs New York Tunnel Mechanical: Recognized international expert on tunnel ventilation systems Claims and Disputes Matt Collins Jacobs Seattle Extensive experience as a claims consultant in Seattle Bill Van Wagenen CH2M HILL Philadelphia Worked on claims for Channel Tunnel project Jason Acres Jacobs Seattle Currently handling claims at U-Link project Jeff Werner Jacobs Los Angeles Previously ran specialist claims consultancy Special Inspections Rick Clausen Jacobs Seattle Segment Inspection, Testing: Led segment inspection and testing oversight for Brightwater and U-Link projects Chris Sundberg, PE CH2M HILL Seattle Welding: Certified Welding Inspector Shinji Goto, PE CH2M HILL Seattle Concrete Risk Management Tim Mantych Jacobs St. Louis 20 years of construction experience and specializes in risk management Document Control Edward Hamm Jacobs Seattle Web-based Doc. Management: Currently a document control specialist on Brightwater Karen Takagi Jacobs Seattle Web-based Doc. Management: Currently a document control specialist on Brightwater Safety Alan Norris Jacobs New York Tunnel Safety: Assigned to Brightwater from 2008 to 2009 Jeff Wahl Jacobs Denver Regional Safety Manager: Jeff is available as needed to support safety oversight Andrew Cook Jacobs Seattle Tunnel Safety: Andrew is currently overseeing safety at U-Link Building Inspection Bill , PE CH2M HILL Corvallis, OR Mechanical Bill Farmer, PE CH2M HILL Seattle Plumbing John Hansen, AIA CH2M HILL Seattle Cladding and Roofing

48 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

We will define in detail content for Inspection reports. Each report will meet the basic require- ments defined in the RFQ, and it will include additional items specific to the kind of activity being reported on. Descriptions of work activity will be tied to specific schedule activities for ease of tracking. We would aim to have daily reports entered into a database, for ease of recall and summary reporting.

Photographs and videos will be taken digitally, and we will propose to manage and catalogue these items using a simple database so that they can easily be searched and retrieved. Typical cataloguing information would include date and time (retrieved from the image itself), photographer, site location, work activity, special equipment, and brief comments. If practical we would also link photographs and videos to specific schedule activities. The database would be network-based so that photographs can be searched by all of your project personnel.

Added Value Propositions As construction managers for tunnel projects all around the world, we understand the “big picture” of construction management for tunnel projects, both internationally and in the Pacific Northwest. We know that successful construction management requires an under- standing of how all aspects of the project and its administration fit together. We will seek to bring best practices and lessons learned from the management of these projects to the SR 99 Project to add efficiency and value to procedures and processes. In addition to focusing on the work elements described in the RFQ, we can offer valuable insights, perspectives, and suggestions in the following areas:

Document and Process Control Our experience shows that implementing effective strategies and choosing appropriate soft- ware tools for data storage, retrieval, and archiving early in a project is critical for effective data management. We are also experienced in the use and application of a wide variety of documentation software applications, including Livelink, Constructware, eRoom, and others. Our broad experience in implementing such systems at Brightwater and elsewhere enables us to contribute meaningfully to setting up such management systems for the SR 99 Project.

At Brightwater, we designed, created, and operated an entirely web-based, state-of-the-art “Business Process Management” workflow application (Intellect), which was used to control all of the basic administrative processes (such as submittals, RFIs, Inspectors’ Daily Reports, and Non-Conformance Reports). All contractors and consultants used this system, which introduced significant efficiencies to management of the various contracts. We know that you Technology for Project have a very demanding 8-day turnaround time for submittals on the SR 99 Project (including Organization. In October third-party review time). Our skill and experience in managing these kinds of processes could 2009, Edward Hamm and add significantly to your ability to meet these timeframes, whichever systems you and Seattle Anthony Pooley gave a Tunnel Partners decide to use. Additionally, we have extensive experience managing third- presentation to your staff on party reviews of project documentation for the various Brightwater contracts and understand Intellect, our innovative workflow- how to effectively address these issues to avoid delays. based project management software that we have used successfully on the Brightwater If you wished to use it, we would be able to deploy Intellect rapidly and configure it very Project. The system provides quickly to match precisely the processes desired by you and Seattle Tunnel Partners to tight control of submittals, RFIs, manage their interactions for critical items such as design submittals. Such a system could and other contract processes, be expanded to encompass a broader range of business processes as the project developed. leading to major improvements in Each process would definitively capture in detail the procedures defined in the construction turnaround time and coordination management plan and would include more than enough automated tracking and auditing data efficiency in areas such as third- to satisfy QA requirements. party reviews. Additional Tunneling Expertise We are able to draw on an extensive pool of additional on-call tunneling expertise with specific knowledge of conditions in the Seattle area, through our engineers and project managers working on the Brightwater and U-Link projects. Such expertise can be available at very short notice. Additionally, we are able to draw on the expertise of our team members more broadly,

49 SR 99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services Approach to the Work

including Jacobs’ design team at the Port of Miami Tunnel, CH2M HILL’s team on the Thames Tideway Project in London, and Babendererde’s global team of TBM tunneling experts.

Other On-Call Expertise Using our extensive local resources, we will be ready and able to provide on-call expertise in most other disciplines required to manage the overall project, such as utilities coordination, structural engineering and inspection, document control, buildings inspection, and roadworks.

Community Interactions Our key personnel have been closely involved in community outreach measures at Brightwater and U-Link. This has included attendance and participation at public outreach meetings, participation in interviews with technical and new media, leafleting of local resi- dents, addressing complaints from property owners, and having one-on-one interaction with property owners during the process of pre-tunneling property inspections. This experience makes us well prepared to support you in your work of communications and public outreach, with the aim of achieving its project goal to “Maximize positive community impacts and interactions.” We will aim to bring our lessons learned in this area to the SR 99 Project. Keep the Public Engaged. While this project will not have Environmental Compliance Verification the same impact as it would if it Cos Roberts of UrbanTech Systems has played an important role on the Brightwater project were above ground, its high- profile and “coolness” factor providing support to King County’s environmental personnel in verification and monitoring of means the public will want to contractors’ compliance with stringent environmental requirements. This has included direct stay involved. We can prepare oversight, reporting, and coordination with regulating agencies. His experience in this area support information and assist would be valuable in assisting you on the SR 99 Project. Additionally, many of our inspec- your selected public involvement tors have been involved in monitoring and recording key environmental data and have devel- specialist in keeping Washington oped an excellent understanding of the local regulatory environment. Anthony Pooley was citizens informed. also responsible for setting up, maintaining, and reporting on a continuous noise monitoring station at the CERN Project in Geneva, which was located very close to a residential area. We understand the importance of environmental compliance issues in a project like the SR 99 Bored Tunnel; we are ready to help you meet your project goal of meeting and exceeding environmental commitments.

While our core focus will be on the key technical elements described in the RFQ, you can be confident that we have the skills, the experience, and the local capacity to provide additional support on short notice, in a wide range of important disciplines, whenever it is needed.

50 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Sections A - D ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER December 8, 2010 n/a B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4. NAME AND TITLE Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. - Resident Engineer 5. NAME OF FIRM Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 425.990.6839 206.296.4384 [email protected]

C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check)

9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT TOR J- V PRIME UBCON- PARTNER S TRAC

a. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 600 108th Avenue, NE Construction Management

CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Suite 700 Support Services; Resident Bellevue, WA 98004 Engineering; Inspection; Safety X Oversight; Project Controls; Contract Management; Administration CH2M HILL, Inc. 1100 112th Avenue NE Resident Engineering, Suite 400 Inspection; Monitoring b. X CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Bellevue, WA 9800

Babendererde Engineers, LLC PO Box 872437 Tunnel and TBM Design

CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Vancouver, WA 98687-2437 Review; Expert Advice c. X on TBMs; Geotechnical Engineering Support and Inspection; Hyperbaric Experts Everett Engineers, LLC 44 State Street Tunnel Systems Integration CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Middleport, NY 14105 and Start-up Planning d. X

UrbanTech Systems 2601 Fourth Avenue Grouting Inspection; CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Suite 440 Environmental Compliance e. X Seattle, WA 98121

D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM  (Attached)

1 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Sections A - D Organization Chart - Phase 1

Washington State Department of Transportation Linea Laird, PE Project Manager Project Principal Don Nelson, PE 1

Internal Reporting Bored Tunnel & TBM Group Pat McCormick, PE Resident Engineer (WSDOT) Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. 1 (Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team)

Safety Manager Deputy Resident Connie Krier, CSS 1 Engineer - Tunnel Derek Dugan 2

Deformation Management Group David Sowers, PE Monitoring/ (WSDOT) Instrumentation Engineer DonaldXXX Olson, PE 2

Contract Administration Group Brian Nielsen, PE Schedule/Cost Cost Estimator (WSDOT) Engineer Russell Podmayer, PE 1 Ven Tseng, PE 1

Design Manager Susan Everett, PE Tunnel Systems (WSDOT) Integrator Howard Sawyer 4

Legend 1 Jacobs 2 CH2M HILL 3 Babendererde Engineers 4 Everett Engineers 5 UrbanTech Systems (DBE)

2 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Sections A - D Organization Chart - Phase 2

Washington State Department of Transportation Linea Laird, PE Project Manager Project Principal Don Nelson, PE 1

Internal Reporting Bored Tunnel & TBM Group Pat McCormick, PE Resident Engineer (WSDOT) Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. 1 (Jacobs/CH2M HILL Team)

Safety Manager Tunnel Systems Deputy Resident Document Management, Off-site & Special (as required) Connie Krier, CSS 1 Oversight/Integration Engineer - Tunnel Internal Audits Inspection Howard Sawyer 4 Derek Dugan 2 Edward Hamm 1 Jacobs/CH2M HILL Field Safety Officer TBD (WSDOT or CM) Systems Inspector Document Controller TBD (WSDOT or CM)* TBD (WSDOT or CM) Field Safety Officer TBD (WSDOT or CM) Systems Inspector TBD (WSDOT or CM)* Assistant RE - Assistant RE - Tunnels Interior Structures Philipp Elsner 3 TBD (WSDOT or CM) Deformation Management Group Chief Tunnel Inspector Structural Inspector David Sowers, PE 2 TBD (WSDOT or CM) (WSDOT) Roger Johnson Structural Inspector Tunnel Inspectors TBD (WSDOT or CM) Monitoring/ Monitoring/ Clifford Feurtado 2 Instrumentation Engineer Instrumentation Engineer Matt Fagan 1 Donald Olson, PE 2 Christian Hahn 3 Carl Neagoy 1 WSDOT Tunnel Inspectors Grouting Inspector Grouting Inspector Trained by CM Team Larry (Bud) Green 1 Marvin Jensen 5

Contract Administration Group Brian Nielsen, PE Schedule/Cost Scheduler Cost Estimator (WSDOT) Engineer Brad Rollings 1 Russell Podmayer, PE 1 Ven Tseng, PE 1

Assumptions: Design Manager 1. Field work is carried out in two shifts per day, five or six days per week. Susan Everett, PE Tunnel Systems 2. CM staff are fully integrated into WSDOT team. Anthony Pooley acts (WSDOT) Consultant as “point of contact” for CM personnel requirements and issues. Bob Everett, PE, LEED 4 3. For Phase 2, staff will be mobilized based on construction schedule, and will be full time once mobilized.

Legend Notes: 1 Jacobs 2 CH2M HILL 3 Babendererde Engineers * Requirements for mechanical, systems, electrical, and other systems- 4 Everett Engineers 5 UrbanTech Systems (DBE) related inspection to be decided during Phase 1.

3 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. Resident Engineer a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 24 11

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) M.Sc. and Diploma, Soil Mechanics Great Britain – Chartered Engineer B.Sc. (Hons), Civil & Structural Engineering 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Anthony has worked continuously in the field of tunneling and geotechnical engineering since 1986, including large-bore tunneling in Seattle. He has extensive international experience in the construction management and design of tunnels, and monitoring of tunneling-induced settlement and associated building damage, as well as numerical analysis, over-water site investigation, and geotechnical instrumentation. Anthony has spent the past 10 years leading construction management teams on two major tunnel projects. In these roles he has gained hands-on experience of every aspect of project management, at every stage of a project’s life. His technical background in tunneling and deep excavations is the cornerstone of his construction management expertise. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager. Anthony led the consultant construction management services for this $1.8 billion wastewater treatment and con- a. veyance project. Responsibilities included overseeing preconstruction and construction activities for 14 miles of soft ground tunnel- ing using EPB and Slurry techniques in difficult geology with hydrostatic heads up to 7 bar. He also played a key role in advising the owner on commercial matters (changes, claims, and disputes) covering a broad range of issues. He played a leading role in several Dispute Review Board hearings on issues, including spoil disposal and contract scheduling constraints. He successfully argued in favor of increasing the number of safety management staff on the project to provide a more effective site presence. In October the project was awarded Jacobs’ highest safety honor, a 2010 President’s Health Safety & Environment Excellence Award. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Civil Engineering Works for the CNGS (Neutrino) Project, Geneva, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) Switzerland 2004 2004 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Construction Manager and Designer’s Representative. Responsibilities on this $80 million project to construct a new particle b. physics experiment at the prestigious CERN particle physics laboratory included management of all aspects of construction and implementation of a series of major tunnel alignment and design changes during construction. The tunnels were constructed in rock varying from hard, abrasive sandstones to very weak, soft mudstones that decomposed rapidly on contact with air. Excavation was carried out using an open face TBM and two road headers. As construction manager, Anthony recruited and led the site supervision team from start to finish. He had overall responsibility for every aspect of the construction management effort, including all technical and contract administration matters, preparing and issuing correspondence, change management, and pay application processing. He worked closely with the Owner’s Project Manager and the contractor’s management throughout the project. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Jubilee Line Extension Project Contract 102, London, England PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 1997 1999 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm c. Geotechnical Specialist. After working on the design of the Westminster station, Anthony was seconded to the Owner’s construc- tion management team as part of a specialist geotechnical group to oversee tunneling and station excavation for this $5 billion project to add 11 new stations and associated twin bored running tunnels to London’s Jubilee metro line. The team focused particularly on issues associated with tunneling and excavation-induced settlement, including building damage assessment, geotechnical monitor- ing, and compensation grouting. This project involved excavation of the deepest open excavation ever made in London, immediately adjacent to the historic Big Ben clock tower and directly beneath an operating metro line.

4 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Larry (Bud) Green Grouting Inspector a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 43 3

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline)

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Larry has more than 30 years of specialized experience as a senior inspector, grouting inspector, mining inspector, and management consultant for numerous tunneling and grouting projects, and completed numerous projects in seismically active areas. His technical training is extensive, and includes 80 hr. Soils Classification and Identification and Basic Rock Identification; 80 hr. Blasters Training and Safety; 80 hr. Mining and Heavy Equipment Safety; 96 hr. Drilling and Sampling for Engineering Purposes; 40 hr. Health and Safety Training for Hazardous Waste Workers; 32 hr. Construction Safety Standards; and 32 hr. Drilling Mud School. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm a. Senior Inspector/Representative. Working on the Central Contract that consists of a 52- by 90-foot shaft, a 20,100-foot-long west tunnel, and an 11,600-foot-long east tunnel. In addition, Larry was the mining inspector for the tunnel boring machines assembly, excavation, lining, and pipe installation. He is responsible for assisting and advising inspectors working underground; monitoring separation/slurry plant operations, slurry consistency and on going modifications to the separation process and separation plant equipment; and ensuring compliance of the NPDES permit. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Arrowhead West Tunnel, Inland Feeder Project, San Francisco, CA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) XXX XXX (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Management Consultant. Responsible for providing inspection of the TBM excavation of a 19.1- by 4,900-foot tunnel using state- b. of-the-art Herrenknecht hybrid slurry TBM and VTM laser guidance system; and inspection of the installation of bolted/gasketed concrete primary lining capable of withstanding 1,100-foot potential hydrostatic pressures. In addition, inspected and directed probe and grout hole drilling using five Arrow percussion; inspected and directed probe and consolidation grouting using, Portland and Microfine cements; inspected and directed three stages of annulas/contact grouting; and inspected and directed contractors activities performed for soil grouting with sodium silicate and contractor’s installation and implementation of bag rings to shunt water outside liner. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Riverside Badlands Tunnel, Inland Feeder Project, Riverside, CA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) XXX XXX (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm c. Mining Inspector. Inspected access shafts excavation /installation and dewatering installation/activities along alignment for this 16.8-foot diameter by 8-mile-long tunnel. Inspected TBM excavation, installation of the initial pre-cast concrete segmental liner and installation of rail; inspected installation of tunnel support ring steel; and inspected and directed the contractors urethane, sodium silicate and cementatious grouting activities. Also inspected the installation of the 12-foot diameter steel liner, placement of the cel- lular concrete annulus backfill and contact grouting, and the application of the mortar liner placed inside the steel liner.

5 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Ven Tseng, PE Schedule Engineer a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 27 4

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) M.S., Civil Engineering DC, MD, VA – Professional Engineer B.Arch., Architecture 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Ven has 27 years of experience in transportation infrastructure construction management with a proven track record of proficiency in planning, scheduling, interface management, claims resolution, and administration of multi-phased construction contracts for underground motorway/rail projects. Ven’s approach to scheduling is to establish the project baseline in the project initialization stage by incorporating all scheduling parameters concluded by the management and present it on a time- chainage diagram backed up by Primavera scheduling data. By monitoring and reviewing the schedule data on a routine basis, Ven maintains an overall view of the project and keeps the management well-informed on the status of the project. With this position, it enables him to develop meaningful alternatives when project execution deviates from expectation.

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm a. Project Controls Manager. Ven’s responsibilities include coordinating six project controls staff with technical backgrounds of esti- mating, scheduling, claims review/entitlement analysis, project alternatives/scenarios development to meet demands of the manage- ment team, and deliver accurate reporting of project level schedules and cost. He presents and assists with establishment of overall program goals related to project controls. Ven also reviews and comments on all contractors’ detailed construction schedules, includ- ing their schedule of values for payment purpose, and is responsible for monitoring and updating the master schedule. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Project Controls Support for Various Projects in the Asia Pacific Region, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) Bangkok, Thailand 2006 2006 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm b. Project Controls Manager. Ven was responsible for providing support to various projects/offices in establishing and/or improving their project controls functions. He also participated in several large-scale project bid proposal preparation, particularly in the areas of estimating and scheduling: Thessaloniki Metro Project in Thessaloniki, Greece ($1.1 billion); Cross City Tunnel Project in Syd- ney, Australia ($400 million); North-South Bypass Tunnel Project in Brisbane, Australia ($1.8 billion); Bangkok New Airport Transit Link project in Bangkok, Thailand – ($750 million); Ho-Chi-Minh City Metro Project ($600 million) and Phu My Bridge Project (USD $105 million) both in Ho-Chi-Minh City, Vietnam. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Bangkok MRT Underground Structure South Contract, Bangkok, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) Thailand 2002 2002 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Planning and Scheduling Manager. Ven led a team of eight schedulers to provide scheduling control function to the joint venture’s c. project management office in planning, monitoring, controlling, and managing project execution. The project included the design and construction of a $950-million underground structures, including five miles of twin bored tunnels. As manager, Ven established management procedures for planning, scheduling, interface coordination, progress assessment and reporting, all of which have been fully implemented within the joint venture organization in five major construction offices. He developed and obtained a detailed works program with more than 12,000 activities, which covered the contract scope of design, civil/structural construction, archi- tectural finishes, and interfaces coordination with system-wide designated contractors in achieving contractual key dates as well as testing and commissioning of the entire line section.

6 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Connie Krier, CSS Safety Engineer a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 14 2

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) A.A. Degree Certified Construction Safety Specialist

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Connie is currently managing safety on the Brightwater Conveyance Project, and is a Certified Construction Safety Specialist, a qualification obtained from University of Washington. She is a member of the advisory committee steering and defining SHAFT, the local unions’ tunnel safety training course, is registered as a stakeholder committee member for the forthcoming overhaul of local compressed air regulations, made a presentation to the Governor’s Construction Safety Conference in 2009 on the subject of underground safety, and is OSHA 500 certified, which means she can train OSHA 10 and 30. Connie has daily working knowledge of tunneling in Washington, including compressed air work and the variances required for working under pressure. She has worked with both EPB and Slurry machines, and is knowledgeable of their potential safety hazards. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Safety Manager. Connie’s main responsibility is the safety of the management team, client representatives, and site visitors. She also a. provides safety oversight of the four contracts, which include submittal reviews, job walk hazard assessments, recommendations of hazard abatement, reviews and comments on safety manual updates, and interface with the client and contractor. She keeps training and records up to date for the construction management team and client team. She helps the client to maintain their contractor safety incentive program by tracking hours worked, tracking on the job incidents, and corrective measures. She conducts safety evaluation reviews with the client and contractors, and coordinates safety issues with regard to contract interface between the four contractors. Coordinates OCIP safety audits and makes certain of contractor corrections within specified timeframes. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Public Utility District (PUD) No. 1 of Douglas County, Wells Dam PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) Employee Safety Manual Update, East Wenatchee, WA 2009 n/a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Safety Consultant. Helped update the Employee Site Safety Manual at Wells Dam for Douglas County to make certain all facets b. of known and predictable hazards where properly addressed. These include descriptions of roles and responsibilities of dam staff, general safety rules, site access, training, first aid, emergency procedures, reporting procedures, hot work procedures, PPE require- ments, fall protection, confined space safety, and lock out/tag out (LOTO) procedures. She conducted a walk-around inspection at the dam to identify potential hazards as well as areas in need of hazard corrections. She has served as an on-call safety consultant as needed for this project. During the engineering of fall protection systems at the dam she helped in ensuring compliance with State fall protection standards that exceed OSHA federal standards. In addition she helped identifying load testing requirements for unique scaffolding situations. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Department of Labor and Industries, Tukwila, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2008 n/a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm c. Safety Consultant. Provided on-site consultative assistance to employers of all sizes in the region, with emphasis placed on assisting in high-hazard industries and assisting employers in developing and implementing safety programs designed to meet Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) Washington Administrative Codes (WAC) Standards. She produced formal reports citing hazards and the specific codes associated. She followed up on all reports to ensure employer compliance with abatement. She brings a working knowledge of WAC including how to reference, look up, and interpret codes; in addition to being able to identify hazards find the correlating code and make recommendations on abatement methods.

7 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Don Nelson, PE Project Principal a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 32 2

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) M.S., Civil Engineering WA – Professional Civil Engineer B.S., Civil Engineering 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Don is Jacobs’ Director of Engineering after a nearly 30-year career with WSDOT. His extensive experience covers all areas of capital program delivery including statewide management of roadway and bridge design, construction, materials and geotechnical design, environmental processes and permits, and real estate acquisition. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Jacobs, Bellevue, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) n/a n/a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm a. Director of Engineering. Responsible for technical quality and resource allocation for all projects performed in the Seattle area office and vicinity. Supervises section managers in the areas of bridges, highways, ports, hydro fisheries, and water/wastewater. Pro- vides support to project managers to ensure successful project execution. Ensures the technical quality of project work meets client expectations. Works with section managers to evaluate, develop and implement improvements to work processes and products that improve productivity and deliver value to clients. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2008 n/a b. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Director, Environmental and Engineering Programs/Deputy Chief Engineer. Responsible for agency policies and activities related to all areas of capital program delivery. Directed design, bridge design and condition, real estate services, environment, construction, materials laboratory, and consultant services programs. Coordinated with various agencies and jurisdictions to discuss, plan, negotiate, and coordinate activities related to all phases of project delivery. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 1998 n/a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm c. State Design Engineer. Responsible for developing and administering policies, procedures, training, and application of statewide design standards and processes. Technical areas included geometric design, hydraulics, value engineering, computer-aided engineer- ing, access management, utilities, roadside safety, contract preparation, and right-of-way plans. Delivered project delivery support to regional and modal offices by providing design office services, as well as assisting in the integration of other project functions such as environmental services, bridge design, property acquisition, traffic design, and program management. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 1996 n/a d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Deputy Director, Office of Urban Mobility. Developed key business functions and identified resource needs for the office shortly after its creation. Represented WSDOT in long-range planning activities within the central Puget Sound region. Typical activities included the development and review of local comprehensive plans, major corridor studies, strategic and technical planning with the regional transit authority, and integration of the State Transportation Plan into the Metropolitan Transportation Plan.

8 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Russell Podmayer, PE Cost Estimator a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 35 1

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) M.B.A., Business Administration Professional Engineer – WA, IL, RI, MA B.S., Civil Engineering 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Russell recently joined Jacobs bringing 35 years of civil engineering and estimating experience. He is currently providing service on the Brightwater Conveyance Project, involved in change order negotiations. His experience spans Washington State on a wide variety of projects, providing estimating services, so he has a strong background with the local materials and labor markets to make accurate estimates. Before joining the firm, he worked for local contractors, so he has great insight into their processes and material planning to help him provide more accurate cost estimates.

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) a. 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Senior Estimator. Prepared independent estimates for change order negotiations on this major soft ground tunneling effort north of Seattle. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED I-90 Undercrossing, Mercer Island, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) b. 1986 1986 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager/Estimator. Estimator/project manager on the first permanent slurry wall constructed in the Seattle area. Slurry panels were part of a permanent retaining wall for the I-90 widening project. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Nickerson Street Slide Repair, Seattle, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) c. 1999 1999 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Estimator/Project Manager. Provided cost estimating services for the $130,000 slide repair using soldier piles and shotcrete facing. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Woodinville Fire Station, Woodinville, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) d. 2000 2000 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Senior Estimator. Completed detailed cost estimates for the $3.5 million construction of a one-story wood office building. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Shoreline Community College, Shoreline, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) e. 2001 2001 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Senior Estimator. Prepared accurate cost estimates for the this $1.2 million multiple-tenant improvement project in various campus buildings. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Seattle School District, Seattle, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) f. 2001 2001 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Estimator/Project Manager. Provided estimating services for a $215,000 childcare center renovation and new playground.

9 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Edward Hamm Document Control, Internal Audits a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 14 2

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) B.A., Sociology Records Management Basic Level Certificate (ARMA)

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Ed joined Jacobs with more than 14 years of both hands-on and technical experience as a Document Control Manager, and Configuration Control Manager in addition to being the Records Management Supervisor for the recent Seattle Monorail Project. He has worked the last ten years in development and implementation of web-based PMIS, Document Control, and Records Management solutions for various construction projects. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, Seattle, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Project Management Information Systems Administrator. Responsible for development, customization, implementation and a. administration of a construction web-based document management system for the Brightwater Conveyance Project utilizing Con- structware and Instant Application Platform. Responsible for conducting staff, consultant, and contractor training on Constructware functionality and Construction Management Policies and Procedures along with development of training curriculum and materials. Document Control Administrator for project documentation and ongoing development of construction management procedures. Primary liaison between Construction Management Team and Contractors for processing of contract deliverables, correspondence, transmittals, RFIs, submittals, change orders and construction progress photos utilizing Thumbsplus. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Seattle Monorail Project, Information Technology (IT) Department, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) Seattle, WA 2005 n/a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm b. Records Management Supervisor. Responsible for development, customization, implementation, and administration of a web- based electronic document management system. Work included supervision of records management and document control policies and procedures including integration of records management principles and creation of document retention schedules for all project records. Responsible for coordinating and conducting system software training for all employees, consultants, and outside agency staff along with development of system training manuals and guidelines. Establishment and ongoing maintenance of a technical reference library. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Metro Red Line North Hollywood Extension, Los Angeles, CA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 1999 2000 c. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Document Control Manager. Responsible for the Document Control Department and change control activities, and managed tech- nical control staff in the project office and provided field office direction for document control policies and procedures. Coordinated distribution of all documentation and correspondence. Supervised, trained, and coordinated activities of department personnel, including a courier and four document control specialists. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Sound Transit Link Light Rail, Seattle, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2001 n/a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm d. Document Control Manager. Responsible for supervising all daily activities of the document control department for Sound Transit’s Link Light Rail division. Responsibilities included development and implementation of document control policies and procedures, record databases, internal workflow processes, and coordination with outside agencies and consultants for audits, claims evaluations, and on-site records retrieval. Direct liaison with the Project Management Oversight Committee and FTA for all document manage- ment issues and distributions.

10 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Matt Fagan Tunnel Inspector a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 20 3

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) Certificates in: OSHA 10 and 30; Compressed Air (Certified up to Four Bars of Pressure); Confined Space; Hazardous Materials; Gas Tester; Self Rescuer Device; First Aid and CPR 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Matt has more than 20 years of tunnel boring experience including EPB, Slurry Shield, Open-Faced machines, and drill and blast tunnels. In addition, he has 3 years providing inspection and documentation on numerous construction projects. His work includes all phases of tunneling and shaft development including drilling shafts, codie piles, excavation, light and heavy railing. Matt also has a strong background with water, wastewater, stormwater, pipelines and land development. He is very familiar with the development, enforcement and administration of building construction codes and ordinances. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Tunnel and Surface Inspector. Responsible for construction management of the Central Contract, which consists of two segmen- tally-lined tunnel drives of 11,600 feet and 20,100 feet excavated with slurry TBMs through difficult glacial geology and groundwa- a. ter pressures up to 7 bars. Frequent hyperbaric interventions were conducted at high pressures to maintain the condition of the TBM cutter head. Other contract work includes a 90-foot launch shaft utilizing slurry wall construction, a 205-foot receiving shaft utilizing ground freeze excavation, a micro-tunnel drive of 1,600 feet, 1,800 feet of open-cut pipeline, and installation of final lining pipes within the tunnels. Responsibilities include evaluating construction progress; remedying open issues; monitoring and documenting the contractor’s timely prosecution of work; interfacing and coordinating with other Construction Manager’s and Field Engineers to maintain and track various logs, reports, and field records, including all TBM production, precast ring builds, and grouting; and cutter head inspection to check for tool damage and inspect ground conditions in up to 4 bars of compressed air. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED San Vicente Pipeline, San Diego, CA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2007 2008 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm b. Lead Tunnel Worker. Working with the San Diego County Water Authority, was responsible for three site locations that consisted of an 11-mile water conveyance system. Supplied TBM with all necessary supplies for production; extensively involved in precast segments, utility pipes, and grouting; developed the shaft, and worked on drilling and blasting the starter tunnel, for the launch of the tunnel boring machine, at the west portal. In charge of drilling; handling track laying; Drilling and loading with explosives; and for mucking out. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Olivenhain Dam, San Diego, CA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2003 2003 c. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Concrete Foremen. In charge of 15 employees, Matt’s responsibilities included extensive prep work duties; created, smoothed, and finished surfaces; and poured concrete placement for a 1,200-foot tall, half-mile long, Roller Compact (RCC) Dam. Worked as drill- ing and blasting supervisor in rock quarry that supported the concrete plant for supplying material used to build RCC dam.

11 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Carl Neagoy Tunnel Inspector a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 12 4

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline)

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Carl brings 18 years of world-class tunneling experience. He has recent, local experience on the Brightwater project, and also brings a wealth of hands-on, practical knowledge of tunneling design, operations, and setup with his prior experience working for TBM manufacturers Herrenknecht and Akkerman. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm a. Microtunneling Expert, QA Inspector. Responsibilities include overseeing pre-construction and construction activities for the installation of more than 2,150 feet of 77-inch and 88-inch outside diameter polycrete pipe by microtunneling. Three drives have been completed through glacial till material, beneath groundwater depths up to 65 feet. The remaining approximately one third of the microtunneling work on the Brightwater Project was completed by the end of 2010. Since late 2009, Carl has been QA Inspector on the West Contract and in the tunnel on the Lovat TBM. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Herrenknecht Corporation, Auburn, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2008 n/a b. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Sales, Marketing, and Technical Support Manager (United States). Provided sales, marketing, and technical support. Respon- sibilities included sales and leasing of microtunneling equipment in the U.S., Canada, and Europe; on-site customer service, daily customer communications; engineer and owner liaison; market exploration; contract negotiation; extensive industry knowledge and contacts; logistics management; and troubleshooting and crisis management. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Akkerman Trenchless Equipment, Brownsdale, MN PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2004 n/a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm c. Microtunneling Operations and Customer Training Manager, Sales Manager. Provided sales, leasing and operations support. Responsibilities included sales and leasing of microtunneling and conventional tunneling equipment; project specification review; bid presentation and contract negotiation; customer, project owner and engineer liaison; recognized Industry Association, Confer- ence and University speaker on field practices in microtunneling; contributed to tradeshow efforts; organized microtunneling techni- cian operations; and input into development of training and operation manuals. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Herrenknecht Corporation, Greenville, SC PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 1998 n/a d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Microtunneling System Operating Technician. Factory trained at Herrenknecht Corporation AG plant in Schwanau, Germany on system fabrication and troubleshooting; trained in microtunneling site set-up and operation at European and N. American project locations; trained international customers’ personnel at factory and on-site; multiple-month overseas assignments in nine countries over five years; multiple microtunneling system management on large projects; and litigation experience.

12 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section E

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Brad Rollings Scheduler a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 16 1

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Bellevue, WA) 16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) B.S. Construction Management

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Brad has 16 years of experience as a project controls engineer in the following industries: tunneling, wastewater, trans- portation, airport, electric/gas utility, power and petrochemical. He is experienced with creating schedules from scratch for conceptual phase or extremely detailed construction, based on a quick conversation or detailed sketches and drawings. He is experienced at gathering and incorporating schedule update information from multiple sources on a project team. He is very knowledgeable and experienced with critical path methodology, earned value analysis, and analysis of contractor schedules. He is highly proficient in the utilization of Primavera scheduling software (multiple versions). 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Schedule/Cost Control. Responsible for the development and monthly updating of the master program schedules by integrating a. contractor construction schedules with summary level schedules. Reviews monthly contractor schedule submittals using critical path methodology and earned value analysis to assist in approval of monthly contractor payment applications. Determines entitlement for delay claims and assists project manager during negotiations with the contractor. Responsible for quarterly reporting of cash flow projections for each project. Trained as backup to project controls manager for monthly financial reporting for CM contract in the Jacobs financial system. His work involves direct interface with client project managers, consultant resident engineers, change control staff, construction inspectors, and construction contractor staff. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Puget Sound Energy (PSE), Bellevue, WA PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2008 n/a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm Senior Scheduler. Part of a team providing project controls system consulting services to PSE for the installation of a company- b. wide project controls system for tracking the cost and schedule on all of their capital projects. Provided lead scheduling support for the project team in the integration of Project Controls until PSE was able to fully staff the department. Coordinated installations of Primavera P3e/c v3.5 for Project Controls group, and tested configurations for Primavera as the super-user/administrator. Since Project Controls was a new concept for PSE, this was a very critical role to help them determine the direction of how to integrate Primavera with existing practices and procedures. Provided project schedules for up to 12 project managers and up to 50 Operations capital projects each year – electric substations, transmission and distribution lines, gas pipelines, and stations. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Sea-Tac International Airport South Terminal Expansion Project, Seattle, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) WA 2002 2004 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE  Check if project performed with current firm c. Program Scheduler. Responsible for the development and monthly updating of the master program schedules including pre-design, design, and construction schedules for parts of this $2.6 billion program. His work involved direct interface with program managers, project managers, design consultants, construction contractors, airport business management, and airport tenants. He used critical path methodology, earned value analysis and analysis of contractor schedules to determine delay claim validity. He was responsible for quarterly cash flow projections for each project. He worked on a variety of projects for each of these programs: Satellite Transit System, Terminal and Tenant Works, South Terminal Expansion (STEP), and Infrastructure Improvements Projects.

13 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 1 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION Brightwater Conveyance Project SERVICES (If applicable) King County, Washington 2011 2011 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER King County, Washington Judy Cochran 206.205.1459 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Working with CH2M HILL, Babendererde, Everett Engineers, and UrbanTech Systems, we are providing construction management services for the $1.5 billion Brightwater Conveyance Project, a new regional wastewater treatment system under construction in northern King County. The project includes a 36-mgd wastewater treatment plant located north of Woodinville in Snohomish County, and 14 miles of new pipeline to convey treated water to a marine outfall facility in Puget Sound near Point Wells.

Approximately 14 miles of tunnels ranging from 16 feet to 20 feet in excavated diameter are being constructed using soft-ground tunneling techniques in glacial tills and highly variable geology at depths ranging from 40 to 440 feet below the surface. The tunnels experience significant pressure up to seven bar from the groundwater above the tunnels, requiring special tunneling methods to address the high pressure not experienced in any U.S. tunnels constructed to date. All of the tunnels were constructed from shafts constructed using composite slurry wall techniques. Various configurations of pipe are installed in the tunnels for conveyance of influent, effluent, and reclaimed water to and from the treatment plant. A 175-mgd pump station was constructed below grade in a large-diameter shaft. The project includes approximately 5,000 feet of 72-inch-diameter microtunneling and appurtenant facilities for odor control and connection to existing facilities. The marine outfall consists of a single 60-inch outfall pipe located on the bottom of Puget Sound for a distance of approximately 5,000 feet to a water depth of 600 feet.

Our construction management work includes overseeing pre- construction and construction activities. We are responsible for project management, including program-level cost estimating and scheduling for the construction activities, and the interface management of program construction contracts. The construction management services contract includes requirements for coordinating all subconsultants; project management support, including a safety program, quality assurance, and support to the Project Advisory Board; project controls, including scheduling, cost control, and cost estimating; information management and document control services; constructability reviews; construction management plan development; community relations; inspection; and resident engineering.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Bellevue, WA and other locations Construction Management, Cost Estimating and Scheduling, Safety, a. Quality Assurance, Document Control, Resident Engineering

14 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION University Link (U-Link) Light Rail Program SERVICES (If applicable) Seattle, Washington 2016 2016 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Sound Transit Joe Gildner 206.689.3350

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

In a joint venture between Jacobs and CH2M HILL (Seattle Tunnel and Rail Team (START) team, we are providing construction management services for the $1.7 billion U- Link Program. The program includes 3.2 miles of 21-foot- diameter twin-bored tunnels, two deep light rail stations, and connections to existing light rail construction. The project is a nine-year effort to link downtown Seattle with the University of Washington, constructed under densely built-up urban topography, and I-5. Like most tunnels in Seattle, these are constructed entirely in highly variable glacial and interglacial deposits. Tunneling is at depths of 15 to 300 feet, with hydrostatic pressures of up to 6 bar expected.

The two main tunneling contracts were let in 2009 and began mobilizing in late 2009/early 2010. Station box excavation is now commencing. Tunneling will take place in 2011 and 2012 from the University and Capitol Hill stations. The contractor is using a Hitachi-Zosen EPB machine for both drives, which have an internal diameter of 18 feet, utilizing a 9.8-inch precast gasketed lining.

The Jacobs/CH2M HILL team is charged with overseeing all phases of U-Link construction, from constructability reviews to demolition and construction through testing and commissioning of the light rail system. We perform day- to-day contract administration for the program. Sound Transit has numerous goals for the program, which include: Proactively identifying and solving problems; Managing costs and risks; Coordinating work with stakeholders, including WSDOT; Overseeing and inspecting all construction activities; and maintaining the U-Link schedule.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Bellevue, WA and other locations Construction Management, a. Contract Administration, Constructability Reviews

15 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION Henderson/Martin Luther King CSO Control Project SERVICES (If applicable) King County, Washington 2007 2007 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER King County, Washington Rick Andrews 206.296.1432

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Jacobs provided construction management services for this project, which included an upgrade and expansion of an existing wastewater pump station, new conveyance pipelines, and a storage tunnel. The 3,100-foot-long, 14-foot, 8-inch-diameter storage and treatment tunnel running along 42nd Avenue South right-of-way was mined through soft ground using a Lovat earth pressure balance machine (EPBM) with segmented liners at depths ranging from 30 to 90 feet. Other work included soft ground tunneling of a 735-foot-long, 60-inch-diameter microtunnel using an earth pressured balanced (EPB) slurry shield and tunneling 42-inch to 72-inch diameter tunnels for 1,250 feet through soft ground using a variable opening, rotating cutterhead TBM with depths ranging from 10 to 65 feet below grade. The project alignment transversed extremely high traffic areas in a congested urban setting, with tunneled crossings under I-5 and multiple railroad tracks. We were proud to have zero reportable incidents.

We provided pre-construction services including constructability review, scheduling, public involvement, and bidding support. During construction, our role included full service on-site construction management, field inspection, complete project controls, scheduling, and document control. We coordinated start up activities for all facilities and close-out for all phases of the project.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Bellevue, WA and other locations Construction Management, a. Constructability Review, Scheduling, Field Inspection, Project Controls, Document Control

16 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION North Shore Connector Tunnel SERVICES (If applicable) Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2012 2012 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Port Authority of Allegheny County Winston Simmonds 412.566.5106

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Jacobs is providing Program Management and Construction Management Services (PM/CM) on this new start light rail subway project in an urban environment in downtown Pittsburgh. The project includes the construction of two tunnels, which are mined under the Allegheny River. The 4,000 feet of tunnels are being mined with an SPB constant-face pressure TBM. The project also includes construction of three subway stations, approximately 2,000 lineal feet of cut and cover double box tunnel, 2,000 lineal feet of aerial structure, one aerial station, tunnel portals, train control signals, track and switch work, operations and control center work, communications, traction power catenary system, tunnel ventilation, mechanical, electrical construction, and systems integration.

We are providing complete PM/CM services from start to finish on this project as sponsor of the TriGold Joint Venture. The scope of work includes cost and schedule control, estimating, design reviews, constructability reviews, value engineering, peer reviews, resident engineering, inspection, utility coordination, permit acquisition, quality assurance, safety monitoring, change order processing, claims and disputes resolution, integration testing, and pre-review operations testing. This is a six-year construction project totaling 1.6 miles in length. Tunnels are constructed under hydrostatic heads with a complete waterproofing system installed to eliminate water inflows into the tunnels and stations.

During the early design phase of the project, the designer proposed an immersed tube tunnel crossing the Allegheny River. Jacobs investigated this design and proposed an EPB/SPB bored tunnel alternative. An alternate tunneling methodology study was conducted and the EPB/SPB approach was selected, which resulted in a savings of approximately $21 million dollars and also satisfied environmental concerns about excavating in the Allegheny River. Jacobs also implemented a series of rigid cost and change control measures that kept the change order/claims/capital cost under the $538 million budget. Currently, changes and claims are only 1.0% of the construction value with 75% of the overall construction completed to date.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Various Locations Construction Management, Cost and Schedule Control, Design Reviews, Value Engineering, a. Resident Engineering, Inspection, Utility Coordination, Safety Monitoring, Claims and Disputes Resolution

17 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION Metro Red Line North Hollywood Extension SERVICES (If applicable) Los Angeles, California 2000 2000 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Los Angeles MTA Henry Fuks 213.922.6000

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Jacobs was both managing principal of the JMA joint venture and construction management lead on this $1.3 billion light rail tunneling project, providing overall construction management, pre-construction through construction and procurement. Jacobs provided design, construction management, and claims resolution. This assignment involved several challenging issues including tunneling through hard rock under the Hollywood Hills and soft ground under Lankershim Boulevard – an area deeply affected by fault lines and other seismic concerns.

Pre-construction management involved constructability analysis, contract document review, construction scheduling, maintenance of procedure manuals, pre- construction surveys, contractor bid evaluation and geotechnical work. Construction and procurement management services included resident engineering, contract management, scheduling, estimating, reporting, document control, cost engineering, progress payments, submittals, quality control, systems safety and assurance, environmental, geotechnical, third party coordination, community relations, surveys, testing and startup, and final acceptance. This effort was coordinated with numerous city and state agencies, and the surrounding community.

A blanket shaft enclosure was key in reducing noise from construction during station and tunnel development. The team worked closely with Caltrans to meet strict criteria, by improving the tunneling methods for the starter tunnels and re-evaluating associated settlement. By moving through the special seismic section, tunnel length and the cross section was reduced, effecting more than a 50-percent construction scope reduction while improving tunnel support. Comprehensive evaluation and implementation of new environmental mitigation to the tunnel work under the Santa Monica Mountains included reducing cross passage blasting and pre-grouting to maintain the existing ground water table. The project involved rearranging and developing hundreds of utilities, aligning the old and bypassing water, sewer, storm sewers; gas; electric; and communications.

We were also hired under a sole source contract to manage and resolve the construction claims outstanding at the end of construction of Segments 2 and 3. This involved the successful settlement and final resolution of more than $130 million of claims at a substantial discounted price to the Authority.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Los Angeles, CA and other Construction Management, locations Resident Engineering, Contract a. Management, Scheduling, Estimating, Document Control, Quality Control

18 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION Dulles Corridor Metrorail Extension Program Management SERVICES (If applicable) Dulles, Virginia 2014 2014 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Metropolitan Washington Airports Sam Carnaggio 703.572.0502 Authority (MWAA) 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Jacobs is leading the Project Management Support Services team providing design management and construction oversight of the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Design-Build extension in the rapidly growing Fairfax and Loudoun Counties of Northern Virginia. Serving MWAA, the project will extend the Metrorail system from the Metrorail Orange Line in Fairfax County through Tysons Corner to Dulles International Airport and beyond the airport to SR 772 in eastern Loudoun County. Most of the 23.1-mile rail extension will be constructed in the median of the Dulles International Airport Access Highway, Dulles Connector Road, and the Dulles Greenway Toll Road with the alignment diverting into Dulles Airport. The Dulles extension represents an approximate 25 percent increase to the existing 106-mile Metrorail system.

Our Project Management Support Services role encompasses several major categories of services that are similar to those needed for the SR 99 Bored Tunnel, including: Design Management and Coordination; Stakeholder Facilitation; Project Cost and Schedule Controls; Document Control; Project Office Management; Information Technology; and Construction Oversight.

MWAA selected Jacobs to lead an integrated program management team co-located in a project office. Staff size fluctuates based upon personnel needs during the planning and various design-build phases, but is comprised of: • MWAA (Owner): 14 • Washington Metro Area Transportation Authority (Stakeholder): 18 • Jacobs and 20 Subconsultants (Program Managers): 62 • Virginia Department of Transportation (GEC Oversight)

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Arlington, VA and other locations Construction Oversight, Program Management, Design Management and Coordination, a. Stakeholder Facilitation, Project Cost and Schedule Controls, Document Control, Project Office Management; Information Technology

19 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 7 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION Civil Engineering Works for the CNGS (Neutrino) Project SERVICES (If applicable) Geneva, Switzerland 2004 2004 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Natacha Lopez Hernandez Natacha Lopez Hernandez 011.41.22.767.2192

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Jacobs provided both detailed design and construction management services to CERN for this $80 million CNGS (CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso) project was built to house a new particle physics experiment to study the behavior of neutrinos. The two-mile complex of tunnels and chambers at CERN houses a beam generation and control apparatus. The target and detector apparatus is almost 500 miles away in Italy (at Gran Sasso). For this reason, the tunnel alignment was a critical issue, requiring the use of gyrotheodolite survey techniques and consideration of the earth’s curvature in the design. The tunnels and chambers diameters ranged from 14 to 33 feet at depths of 180 to 400 feet. They were constructed in a range of soft to hard rocks using a TBM and two roadheaders. Fiber-reinforced shotcrete was used throughout as a primary lining. Secondary linings were shotcrete and gunite for smaller tunnels and cast-in-place reinforced concrete for the larger chambers.

Jacobs carried out detailed design of all elements of the project civil engineering works, advised CERN during procurement, and provided a full range of construction management services from project startup to final closeout. Jacobs also handled a series of major alignment changes to the tunnels at the bottom end of the project alignment, negotiating a change order with no increase in cost to the Owner.

A significant constraint of the project was the provision of only a single access shaft at one end of the project. During the early stages of construction, Jacobs assessed successfully and negotiated a Value Engineering proposal by the contractor to add a new tunnel to the project layout, which would allow excavation to proceed from two headings simultaneously, adding a lot of flexibility to the project schedule.

The project was completed on time and under budget, with no outstanding commercial issues. As a result of our performance our contract scope was extended include management of a follow-on contract to install a 3,000-foot-long, 8-foot diameter steel vacuum tube in one of the competed tunnels. This is the world’s largest such tube and was also completed on schedule and under budget.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Reading, UK and other locations Construction Management, Resident Engineering and Inspection, Tunnel and Shaft a. Design, TBM Performance Analysis, Noise Monitoring, Project Controls (Cost & Schedule), Claims and Disputes Management

20 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 8 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION Port of Miami Tunnel SERVICES (If applicable) Miami, Florida 2014 2014 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Florida Department of Transportation Louis Brais 305.798.7144

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

In 1987, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) began a study for a master plan to improve the traffic circulation and congestions between the Port of Miami (POM) and downtown Miami. This study included a tunnel connection between two man-made islands, Watson and Dodge. By 2005, FDOT concluded that a bored tunnel under Biscayne Bay was feasible. The project will improve access to and from the POM and provide a dedicated roadway connector linking the POM with the MacArthur Causeway (State Route 41/1) and I-395, specifically for the trucks in and out of the POM without going through downtown Miami.

The Port of Miami Tunnel (POMT) project is located adjacent and east to downtown Miami. Its alignment extends from MacArthur Causeway Bridge, Watson Island, under the Cruise Channel in Biscayne Bay and to Dodge Island, where the POM is located. Jacobs, as part of the Miami Tunnel Access (MTA) concession team with contractor Bouygues Travaux Publics of France, is part of the Public Private Partnership (PPP) for the design and construction, the first use of PPP on an underground project in the U.S.

Our role is Engineer to the MTA team, responsible for the tender design of roadways, ITS, bridges, tunnels, temporary support of excavations, utilities, and other structures for the project, including structural, geotechnical, electrical, mechanical, tunnel ventilation, fire/life safety, an utility disciplines.

The proposed 41-foot diameter tunnel will be twin-bored for 1.5 miles, with two highway lanes per bore to be excavated by a closed face EPB TBM. Its lining is two feet thick bolted and gasketed precast concrete segmental lining. The determination factor for the size of the tunnel cross section was a functional requirement to satisfy the vehicular clearance, the space for tunnel ventilation system, the width of the walkway and life/safety issues, the tunnel stability, buoyancy, and security.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE a. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Miami, FL and other locations Engineer, Tunnel Design, Structural Design

21 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 9 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION Upper Rouge Tunnel CSO Project SERVICES (If applicable) Detroit, Michigan 2009 n/a 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Detroit Water and Sewerage Mirza Rabbaig 313.964.9880 Department 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Jacobs provided detailed design and construction management services for the Upper Rouge Tunnel CSO project. The project as designed as a 7-mile, 30- foot diameter underground tunnel to capture and store combined sanitary sewage and stormwater flows from 17 Rouge River sewer overflow locations, plus the cities of Redford and Dearborn Heights. It would significantly reduce the incidents of polluted waters flowing into the Rouge River and, therefore, reduce pollution to surface waters of the area.

The near surface structures (drop shafts and vent shafts) were designed to intercept the combined sewage flows prior to entering the river and convey the flow into the tunnel. The near surface structures also contained devices to prevent flow of combined sewage into the Rouge River.

A dewatering pump station building, housing pumps, associated valves, and electrical equipment, were also to be constructed to lift the wet weather flows to a higher level and convey the flows to the Detroit Wastewater Treatment Plant when capacity is available.

In 2009, the project was cancelled due to lack of funding. Jacobs had begun providing service in early 2006.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE a. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Detroit, MI and other locations Detailed Design and Construction Management Services

22 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section F

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 10 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION Sound Transit Beacon Hill Transit Tunnel SERVICES (If applicable) Seattle, Washington 2008 2008 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Sound Transit Bob Parsons 206.398.5150

24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Jacobs, as part of a joint venture, provided design services for a one-mile long, 22-foot diameter light rail transit tunnel under Beacon Hill near downtown Seattle. The D710 design project included a NATM-mined station shell; a ventilation shaft; and structural PS&E production of the cut-and-cover portals, U-box retaining wall system, the MSE wall system, and the headhouse structure project elements. The tunnel is twin bore excavated with TBMs. At the midpoint of the mile-long tunnels, 175 feet below ground, is a station platform at Beacon Hill, which allows passengers to exit above ground. The project also consisted of one-half mile of elevated structure with another station at McClellan Street. The west portal is beneath the I-5 freeway and required extensive coordination with WSDOT. Jacobs was responsible for portals, headhouse structures, walls, tunnel ventilation, fire protection and plumbing, electrical, and coordination of civil and site work. Jacobs also performed system integration and coordination with affected agencies.

Jacobs provided C710 design services during construction (DSDC) for the tunnel’s construction, including design activities by supporting the Resident Engineer with responses to Contractor RFIs, submittal reviews, review of value- engineering change proposals, and preparing change orders. Also, we provided line management services for DSDC by coordinating with interfacing parties to support the Resident Engineer on their designed portion of C710. During construction, the discovery of unanticipated sand layers under the Beacon Hill Station required the entire dewatering and jet grouting programs to be re-evaluated and minor platform redesign, which Jacobs handled quickly to keep the project on schedule.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Bellevue, WA and other locations Tunnel Design, Construction-phase a. Support

23 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section G

G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F PERSONNEL CONTRACT (Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completing (From Section E, (From Section E, table. Place “X” under projects key number for Block 12) Block 13) participation in same or similar role) 12345678910 Anthony Pooley, C.Eng. Resident Engineer, Project Manager X X X Larry (Bud) Green Grouting Inspector X Ven Tseng, PE Schedule Engineer X Connie Krier, CSS Safety Engineer X Don Nelson, PE Project Principal Russell Podmayer Cost Estimator X Edward Hamm Document Control, Internal Audits X X Matt Fagan Tunnel Inspector X X Carl Neagoy Tunnel Inspector X Brad Rollings Scheduler X

29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) Dulles Corridor Metrorail Extension Program 1 Brightwater Conveyance Project 6 Management Sound Transit University Link (U-Link) Light Rail Civil Engineering Works for the CNGS (Neutrino) 2 7 Program Project 3 Henderson/ML King CSO Control Project 8 Port of Miami Tunnel

4 North Shore Connector Tunnel 9 Upper Rouge Tunnel

5 Metro Red Line North Hollywood Extension 10 Sound Transit Beacon Hill Transit Tunnel

24 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section H

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.

1. Professional Qualifications We offer our clients a wealth of tunneling and under- ground engineering experience from around the globe. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Jacobs) is one of the Our expertise covers the full range of tunnel techniques world’s largest and most diverse providers of profes- from small-diameter non-man entry tunnels, through hand sional technical services. With annual revenues exceeding excavated tunnels, to large mechanized excavations using $9 billion, we offer full-spectrum support to industrial, in-situ or segmental lining systems and NATM techniques. commercial, and government clients across multiple markets. Services include scientific and specialty Jacobs is constantly exploring new innovations for tunnel consulting, as well as all aspects of architecture, engi- design and safety systems. We are leaders in designing neering, construction, and operations and maintenance. fully transverse ventilations systems employing supply and exhaust ducts, centrifugal fans, carbon monoxide Our fundamental business strategy is building long- analyzers, and ventilation controls for independent opera- term client relationships. With more than 60 years in tions. Our sophisticated solutions include state-of-the-art the industry, we have attracted and retained clients by tunnel lighting systems to cut energy costs and improve providing superior customer value—in fact, over 90 driving conditions, and our safety and security specialists percent of our work is repeat business from loyal clients. design and construct early warning systems for fire and This strategy yields cost advantages, profits, and growth smoke detection, chemical or hazardous materials, emer- for us, allowing us to also attract and retain investors and gency communications devices, as well as blast-proof thus fuel further growth. The combination of a loyal client structures and facilities. base and steady growth enables us to attract and retain the industry’s top talent. Our global network includes more Our expertise extends from concept to maintenance, and than 160 offices in over 20 countries. we offer clients a complete cradle-to-grave capability. We are heavily involved in network and maintenance Tunnel Specialists management so that our advice has the benefit of a whole- Jacobs combines the unique experience and qualifications life understanding of transport schemes and great value of a designer for new and retrofitted tunnels with new and can be added at the development and design stages. upgraded tunnel systems (electrical, mechanical, venti- lation, communications, safety and security). In addition, The following page illustrates our extensive qualifications we have substantial experience in the inspection and and experience on projects not included in our proposal or preparation of design and rehabilitation plans for existing Section F or our SF 330. tunnels in rock, soil, and underwater.

Jacobs is a constructor with extensive experience in all types of tunnels – for highways, railroads, water supply, and wastewater – including immersed tube, cut-and-cover, blasted, machine-bored, and shield-driven – from hard rock to soft soil conditions. Our assessment, repair, and upgrading services for existing tunnels can reduce mainte- nance costs and extend the life of a tunnel.

25 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SF 330 – Section H

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.

Exhibit 1. Unmatched Experience

Experience Mined/Bored Tunnel Cut-and-cover Tunnel Immersed Tube Tunnel Construction Management Program Management Controls Project Engineering Tunnel & Design Electrical Mechanical, Ventilation Study/Design Architectural Environmental Geotechnical Communications/ SCADA Engineering Value East Side Access Tunnels RR R RRRR New York, NY Chesapeake Bay Bridge/Tunnel    Virginia Beach to Cape Charles, VA Monitor Merrimac Memorial Tunnel     Newport News/Suffolk, VA Ted Williams Tunnel     Boston, MA Fort McHenry Tunnel    Baltimore, MD I-93 Central Artery Tunnel     Boston, MA IH-635 Managed Lanes, LBJ Tunnel     Dallas, TX Tren Urbano LRT Tunnel     San Juan, Puerto Rico Blue Line Extension  R  Washington, DC US Route 71 Tunnel  R  Little Rock, AR Heathrow Express Tunnels    London, England Dublin Port Tunnel     Dublin, Ireland Rome Metro Line C   R  Rome, Italy Limehouse Link     United Kingdom Metro West Water Supply Tunnel     Boston, MA Inter Island Tunnel     Boston, MA Narrangansett Bay CSO Tunnel  Providence, RI Notes: R = Design Review

I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 32. DATE 31. SIGNATURE January 25, 2011

33. NAME AND TITLE Donald K. Nelson, PE, Project Principal

26 ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS

PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION

1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project, Seattle, Washington 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER December 8, 2010 N/A B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT

4. NAME AND TITLE John Conrad 5. NAME OF FIRM CH2M HILL, Inc. 6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 7. FAX NUMBER 253.304.7524 253.274.4971 John.Conrad@.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check)

9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT J-V PRIME SUBCON- PARTNER TRACTOR

CH2M HILL 1100 – 112th Avenue NE, Suite 400 Resident Engineering and a.  Bellevue, WA 98004 Inspection; Monitoring

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE

D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM  (Attached)

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 1 MANDATORY USE DATE OF FORM 6/2004

1 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.)

12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Derek Dugan Deputy Resident Engineer - a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM Tunnel 35 5

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) CH2M HILL, Inc., Bellevue, WA

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) O Level Certificates Secondary Grammar Education Engineering Technician: Mitchell Construction Engineering Technician: Mitchell Construction Safety in Tunneling: Channel Tunnel Safety in Tunneling: Channel Tunnel Fire Fighting in Tunnels: Hong Kong Fire Fighting in Tunnels: Hong Kong Personal Track Safety course 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)

Professional Organizations / Affiliations Member of the Tunneling and Underground Construction Society

Professional Development 10 Hour OSHA CPR/First Aid

Publications and Presentations Shafts and Hand Tunnels in Soft Ground, D Heycock/D Dugan, BTS Soft Ground Tunneling Seminar, 1998. Brightwater Conveyance Project – Soft Ground Tunnels and Shafts, Ron Drake/Derek Dugan/Anthony Pooley, (Tunneling Association of Canada—Conference). Vancouver, September 2006) 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2005-present 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm As Resident Engineer, Derek is a member of the Jacobs Civil-led construction management team that oversees all aspects of the contractor procurement and construction of large-diameter tunnels that form the conveyance section of the Brightwater project. This $460 million project requires the construction of 13 miles of large-diameter tunnels through a variety of ground conditions, employing earth pressure balance (EPB) and slurry tunneling machines (STM). Derek is involved in the Central Contract, valued at $211 million, working with the Vinci/Frontier Kemper/Parsons Joint Venture. Two slurry-shield TBMs are being used to excavate the tunnels through difficult ground consisting of saturated glacial and post-glacial soils. Initial support is provided by a pre-cast bolted, segmental concrete lining. The finished tunnel will have multiple pipelines grouted into place. Two shafts, with excavated diameters of 58 feet and 25 feet, will be constructed using slurry wall and ground freezing techniques. Shaft depths are 90 and 200 feet. a. The project also includes 3,200 feet of open cut and microtunneled pipe ranging in diameter from 36 inches to 60 inches. Derek’s responsibilities include:  Resident Engineer on site reporting to CM Project Manager  Daily supervision of the contractor’s construction progress  Review of contractor’s submittals and proposals for construction  Review and processing of contractor’s requests for additional information  Assessment of contractor’s claims for additional time and money. Assistance with the review and recommendations with the client  Coordination with adjacent interfacing project contracts  Work with contractor to overcome construction problems  Liaison with third-party agencies regarding interfaces with the construction works Reporting contract status to both the CM and client on a weekly/monthly basis (2) YEAR COMPLETED b (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2000-2005 2005 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Derek was the Resident Engineer and member of the Parsons Brinkerhoff/CH2M HILL JV project management team responsible for overseeing all aspects of the Phase I construction of the $325 million (Singapore dollars) DTSS project for the Singapore Public Utilities Board. The project required the construction of 30 miles of large-diameter tunnels through a variety of ground conditions employing EPB tunneling machines. Derek oversaw the construction of contract T04 (S$73 million) by Samsung Corporation, which involved the driving of 4.47 miles of 14-foot-diameter finished (internal diameter ) tunnels, segmental concrete lined with the subsequent installation of a secondary corrosion protection system. Also, the project included the construction of associated drop shafts, vortex and diversion chambers, connector tunnels, and odor control facilities. Construction techniques used on the structures included NATM (connector tunnels), secant piling, diaphragm walling, and sheet piling. Derek’s responsibilities included:  Resident Engineer on site reporting to CM Project Manager  Daily supervision of the contractor’s construction progress  Review of contractor’s submittals and proposals for construction  Review and processing of contractor’s requests for additional information  Assessment of contractor’s claims for additional time and money. Draft reviews and recommendations presented to CM contracts team.  Coordination with adjacent interfacing project contracts  Work with contractor to overcome construction problems  Liaison with third-party agencies regarding interfaces with the construction works  Reporting contract status to both the CM and Client on a monthly basis

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED C611, Tseung Kwan O Extension, Hong Kong, China PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 1999-2000 2001 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm As Tunnel Manager, Derek worked with the Kier - Hyundai Joint Venture contractor and provided onsite supervision c. of the excavation of twin large-diameter rock tunnels and associated depot tunnels, sidings, crossovers, intersections, fan niches, and construction enlargements for the Pak Shing Kok running tunnels. The tunnels were constructed using drill and blast techniques, employing computerized Atlas Copco Jumbo twin boomed drilling rigs, packaged and bulk explosives, and utilizing temporary support based on the NGI system requiring varying combinations of shotcrete and rock bolts (Resin and Swellex variety).

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED C710, North East Line Project, Singapore MRT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 1998-1999 2000

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm d. As Tunnel Manager Derek worked with Shimizu/Dillingham/Koh JV contractor and provided on-site supervision of the erection, launch and operation of 2 no 6.1m O.D Earth Pressure Balance tunneling machines, manufactured by Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries (IHI). They were TBMs installed for the construction of the running tunnels from Outram Park to World Trade Centre, 2.2 km of twin, concrete segmentally lined tunnels through the Jurong geological formation.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Channel Tunnel Rail Link, London Tunnels, UK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 1997-1998 N/A

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm As Senior Construction Engineer Derek worked with Bechtel Ltd as a member of the London Tunnels e. Construction Team who assisted in the compilation and issue of the contract documents to the pre-qualified Contractors, for the 3 London Tunnels contracts. He was involved in the evaluation and selection process of the returned tenders. This required assessments of the Contractors’ Tender Presentations and clarification meetings with each of the Contractors. He assisted in the process of gaining consents from the Local Authorities for the construction of the sections of the Works and provided construction input to all aspects of the London Tunnels Section. The collapse of the Project financial structure in 1998 led to the Government postponement of the Project indefinitely. STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 2

3 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.)

12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Roger Johnson Chief Tunnel Inspector a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 4 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) CH2M HILL Inc., Bellevue, WA

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Coursework, Engineering, University of Arizona N/A 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) N/A 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2006 - present 2011 (est.) (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm As Senior Tunnel Inspector, Roger is responsible for coordination of construction inspectors, inspection activities for conformance to plans and specifications, documentation of daily construction activities and progress, notifying a. Resident Engineer Derek Dugan of any changed conditions or contractor noncompliance. A key part of his job is day-to-day troubleshooting of problems as they arise with contractors, safety, and so forth. He is also the site safety coordinator. The Central project is a $211 million, 32,000-foot, 17.5-foot-diameter tunnel, utilizing two slurry shield TBMs to excavate, and are supported with a precast bolted and gasketed liner. The mining has been completed and currently, two fiberglass-reinforced pipes and one ductile iron pipe are being installed inside the tunnel. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED West Side Combined Sewer Overflow, Portland, OR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2003-2006 2006x (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Roger was a Tunnel Walker/Supervisor for this $293-million project, which involved the drilling of a 130-foot-deep, 18,200-foot-long, 14-foot-diameter tunnel with Herrenknecht slurry shield TBM—the the first slurry shield TBM in the U.S—in soft ground below the water table. The project involved one-pass, precast bolted gasketed lining, five shafts supported by slurry wall with tremie concrete base plug, 220-million-gallon-per-day pump station in 160-foot-deep by 130-foot-diameter shafts supported by slurry wall with jet grout cut off, and 10,000 linear feet of 72- to 108-inch microtunnel. Roger’s day-to-day responsibility revolved around troubleshooting to maintain continuous operation of underground b. tunneling operations and supervising a 15-man crew. He was responsible for the mining and disposal operation, including safely, and was in simultaneous charge of the TDM and the slurry plant. With extracted material was disposed of on a barge in the middle of the Willamette River, Roger was responsible for coordinating barge movements to accommodate disposal volumes and with other river traffic. He was charged with overseeing tunnel operations to ensure safety and efficiency, adherence to backfill grout parameters, and the timing of the supply train, including the slurry plant. He coordinated tunneling to avoid utilities and saw that minings were disposed of promptly. The project achieved VPP status with OSHA based on safety process and performance record, and was delivered ahead of schedule and under budget.

4 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Trussville Trunk Sewer, Trussville, AL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2004 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Roger was a Tunnel Walker / Supervisor during construction of an 8.5-foot-diameter, 23,000-foot-long tunnel with a CTS TBM using cast-in-place lining. The project also included two shafts at 100-foot depth, underground flow c. control chamber, appurtenant structures, and access roads. As the tunnel walker, Roger’s responsibility was to troubleshoot to maintain continuous operation of underground tunneling operations and supervise a15- to 20-man crew. He was responsible for the mining and disposal operation, including safely. He was charged with overseeing tunnel operations to ensure safety and efficiency, adherence to backfill grout parameters, and the timing of the supply train, including the slurry plant. He coordinated tunneling to avoid utilities and saw that minings were disposed of promptly.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Sound Transit University Link Construction Management PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2010-Present 2016 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Senior Tunnel Inspector. $1.6 billion program for the construction of two underground stations, 3.15 miles of twin- bored running tunnels and associated trackwork, E&M systems and services. The tunnel alignment passes through d. complex and varied glacial till and varies greatly in depth on route from downtown Seattle to the campus of the University of Washington. Responsible for ensuring that the contractor conforms to construction plans and documents. Records daily progress through written reports and photographs. Responsible for notifying the Resident Engineer of any issues and oversees the work of other inspectors.

5 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.)

12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Donald Olson, PE Monitoring/Instrumentation a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM Engineer 40 31 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) CH2M HILL Inc., London, UK

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.S., Geological Engineering, Michigan Professional Engineer: Maryland, Michigan, Technological University, 1977 Wisconsin B.S., Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, 1970 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Publications: With T. Smirnoff. Design Considerations and Owner's Perspective on Risk in the Construction of Inline Pump Station, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Large Rock Caverns, Proceedings of the International Symposium. Helsinki: Pergamon Press. 1986.

With J. Ramage and T. Lutzenberger. Water Control, North Shore Inline Interceptor, Phase II, Milwaukee Water Pollution Abatement Program. Proceedings of the 1989 Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. Los Angeles: Society of Mining Engineers of the American Institute of Mining Engineering. 1989. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2002-2008 2008 Management Projects, Milwaukee, WI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm a. Over the last 6 years, Mr. Olson has served as Resident Engineer on six MMSD construction contracts including the Franklin Pump Station and the Oak Creek South Interceptor, a 6000 LF micro-tunnel in soil, the Hart Park Storm Water Management Project and the N. 27th Street Inline Storage System Extension, a 21-foot diameter, 10,500 LF long rock tunnel project. He concurrently served as the lead geotechnical engineer for investigation and design of tunnel and water reclamation plant projects in Rochester, MN.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) Deep Tunnel and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 1987-1993 1993 Shaft System, Milwaukee, WI (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Geotechnical Team Lead. The investigation results were used in developing the contract documents for the excavation and lining of a 9-mile-long, 300-foot-deep tunnel and associated shafts in weathered and unweathered rock. The investigation also covered a 350-foot-deep pump chamber and shafts in rock. After completion of the investigation, he became construction manager for the pump chamber and tunnel system. He managed the work in b. eight deep shafts and several near surface sewerage structures excavated in variable soils and rock. Temporary support of the shaft soils included soil freezing, steel liner plates with internal ring beams, and driven-steel sheeting. Temporary support of the shaft rock included the use of several types of rock dowels and cast-in-place concrete. Temporary support in the rock tunnel included rock dowels and steel ribs and lagging. The designed permanent support consisted of cast-in-place concrete and pre-cast concrete pipe in both tunnels and shafts. Extensive pre- and post-excavation grouting with cement and chemical grouts was used in large sections of the tunnel system. He managed a highly complicated cost control system that became a requirement when severe geologic and hydro- geologic differing site conditions effectively changed the concepts of job payment. c. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Tunnel Program, Milwaukee, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1987 1980-1987 WI

6 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Geotechnical Coordinator and Assistant Project Construction Manager, 7-Mile-Long Series of Shallow Tunnels and Shafts Excavated in Soil, Rock, and Mixed-Face Conditions, Milwaukee. Work included soft ground excavation using a Lovat closed-face tunnel boring machine in highly variable soil and groundwater conditions, hand mining using a roof-support shield, drill and blast rock excavation, jacked-pipe tunneling, open-cut pipe installation, and a river crossing. Primary shaft support on the project ranged from steel liner plates to driven wooden lagging and from steel sheeting to sunken, concrete caissons. The final shaft lining was cast-in-place concrete. Primary tunnel support was designed to range from steel rib and wooden lagging to steel liner plates with internal steel ribs to single-pass and two-pass pre-cast concrete segmental liners. Final lining consisted of cast-in- place concrete, except where single-pass segments were utilized. For the pre-cast segments, he researched the historic aspects of this method of support. He presided over a series of tests studying the strength and suitability of segments for tunnel operations. The report that resulted from these activities led to early acceptance by authorities of pre-cast linings in tunnels throughout the Milwaukee area.

7 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.)

12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Clifford Feurtado Tunnel Inspector a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 3 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) CH2M HILL Inc., Bellevue, WA

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.A., Criminal Justice, Seattle University, 1996 N/A 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) CH2M HILL 2008 Achievement Award for Outstanding work performance at the Brightwater Project 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, King County, WA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2008 - present 2011 (est.) (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm East Tunnel Inspector. Responsible for performing construction inspection for multiple tunnel projects occurring at a single construction site including inspection activities for conformance to plans and specifications. Working with the resident engineer and notifying of changes in conditions or non-compliance issues. Documents daily construction activities and progress with photographic support. Prepares concise and clearly written daily reports for the project representative. Coordinates with CMS staff and contractors to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. a. Represents King County as a site representative. Works with CH2M HILL's Construction Management Services staff to device solutions to field problems in a timely and organized manor. The Brightwater Project is a five-year project to construct a new state-of-the-art regional wastewater treatment system to service northern King County and southern Snohomish County. The system includes a 13-mile influent and effluent discharge conveyance tunnel, a large pump station, and an outfall in Puget Sound. The conveyance tunnel alignment has been divided into three contracts. The East Tunnel has a lengthof 14,050 linear feet and an excavate diameter of 16 feet by 8 inch inside diameter. The Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) is used to excavate this tunnel which consists of saturated glacial and post-glacial soils.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED University Link (U-Link), Construction Management, Sound Transit, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2007-present 2016x Seattle, WA  b. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Resident Tunnel Inspector on this $360 million, 3.15 mile, light rail extension that will run in twin-bored tunnels from Downtown Seattle north to the University of Washington, with stations at Capitol Hill and on the University of Washington campus near the Husky football stadium with 100,000 feet of lined segmented tunnel for the train.

8 9 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 1 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED London Tideway Tunnels Integrated Delivery Partner, London, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) England On-going 2020 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Thames Water Utilities Phil Stride +44 7747 642 404 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) CH2M HILL, in association with Halcrow, is working with Thames Water, the UK's largest water company, to develop the London Tideway Tunnels. Two major new tunnels are needed to substantially reduce the volume of untreated sewage overflowing from London’s Victorian sewers into the River Thames – estimated to be approximately 39 million cubic metres in an average year (enough to fill the Royal Albert Hall 450 times. Required to ensure the UK complies with Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive the tunnels will make the River Thames and its tributary the River Lee cleaner and healthier for wildlife and for people. The deepest tunnels ever constructed in the capital (up to 75m beneath ground level), the diameter of both the tunnels will be wider than three London buses placed side by side.  Starting in west London and broadly following the path of the River Thames through the centre of the capital, the Thames Tunnel is proposed to transfer the flows from the 34 most-polluting Combined Sewer Overflows”(CSOs) to Beckton Sewage Treatment Works (STW) in the east of the city. Construction is due to commence in 2013, for completion in 2020.  The shorter (7km) Lee Tunnel will eliminate some 16 million cubic metres of sewage from being discharged to the River Lee from Abbey Mills Pumping Station Stratford. Flow from the Lee Tunnel will also be processed at Beckton STW. Construction started in June 2010 for completion in 2014. A cleaner, healthier River Thames is essential for the well being of the city as a whole. The London Tideway Tunnels will ensure the country’s capital remains a flourishing business centre and tourist destination, protecting the city’s reputation around the world.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL London, UK Program Manager

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3 10 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Singapore Deep Tunnel Sewerage System and Infrastructure PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Construction Program, Singapore 1997-2007 2007 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER/EMAIL PUB, The National Water Agency Wah Yuen Long, Director 65 67313368 / [email protected] 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) To help the island achieve its vision for water independence, the $3.65 billion Deep Tunnel and Infrastructure Construction Program represents a cost-effective solution to the country’s long- term water management that will last for 100 years or more, transforming the management of wastewater in Singapore. Entirely gravity fed, Singapore’s new system is one of only two successfully completed and operating major deep-tunnel sewer overflow systems in the world. CH2M HILL, in a Joint Venture with Parsons Brinckerhoff, is managing and integrating the planning, design, and construction of the DTSS, which features large conveyance tunnels installed under the island nation. The DTSS will collect wastewater from link sewers in many Singapore catchments and convey it to ultimately one of two compact state-of-the-art treatment plants, one at each end of the island. Treated effluent will be available for reclamation and reuse or discharge through deep-sea outfalls into the Straits of Singapore. The system will collect, treat, and discharge all sewage from the island nation, eventually replacing more than 134 existing pump stations and six secondary treatment plants with individual outfall systems. This improvement of the nation’s infrastructure will result in cleaner waters around the island Republic, a healthier environment for the citizens of the Republic, and the enhancement of Singapore’s reputation as a high-tech centre in Asia. CH2M HILL/ PB JV is the prime consultant for design and construction management of the program for the Public Utilities Board of the Republic of Singapore. CH2M HILL provided the feasibility study for the whole DTSS scheme, predesign of the sewer tunnels, tender evaluation of the sewer tunnel design and construct contracts, and was program manager for the DTSS Phase 1 tunnels comprising 30 miles of large diameter sewer tunnels. Under the first phase of DTSS, the North and Spur Tunnels were constructed under six design-build contract packages. The first tender, Kranji Tunnel (T-05), was invited in March 1999 and an award made in December 1999. The sixth contract, Queensway Tunnel (T-06) was awarded in March 2000. Contractors for the six tunnels represent companies from Singapore, China, Japan, Korea and Germany. Additionally, tunnel designers representing the United Kingdom, the United States and Austria were appointed by the contractors. The Phase 1 Sewer tunnels have recently been completed on schedule for the commissioning of the Changi Water Reclamation Plant. The project used eight, “State of the Industry” Earth Pressure Balance Tunnel Boring Machines (EPB TBM) up to 24-feet in diameter to excavate the 30 miles of tunnel. EPB TBMs were required to deal with very onerous ground conditions, including fluvial sands, marine clays, as well as hard rock sections with numerous transitions into soft ground. The Tunnels are fully lined with a corrosion protection lining comprising of HDPE cast into 9-inch thick unreinforced insitu concrete to provide for 100 year maintenance free design life. During construction, more than 20 million labor hours were worked across all six design-build contracts with accident frequency rates (number of accidents per one million labor hours worked) as low as 1.43, compared to the industry average of 10.6. "CH2M HILL is a key partner in PUB’s [Deep Tunnel] project, the Changi WRP, as well as our NEWater plants. This close private-public cooperation has leveraged on expertise from both sides, for greater synergy and more sustainable solutions. Our overall water environment has definitely benefited as a result of this cooperation." Dr. Yaacob Ibrahim, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, Singapore.

11 “To avoid the potential for surface settlement we specified the use of positive face control slurry or EPB tunneling.” Mrs. Ang-Tan Seow Kiak, PUB Deputy Director, DTSS Department

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Singapore JV Partner

12 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 3 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Denny Way/Lake Union CSO Program and Construction Management, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) King County, Seattle, WA 1997-2006 2006 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER King County Department of Natural Judy Cochran, Project Manager 206.205.1459 Resources 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

This project involves design and construction a $120-million storage tunnel, conveyance pipelines and pump stations, combined sewer outfall (CSO) control facilities, an additional outfall, and an extension to an existing outfall. It is King County's largest capital facility improvement. Approximately 50 firms and organizations are involved in the project’s design, management, and construction of this project. CH2M HILL provided construction management services from design through construction of this facility and the overall CSO program. They also participated in design coordination and review, cost control and analysis, and preparation of all project schedules.

The new Mercer Street storage tunnel is 6,200 feet long and 14.8 feet in diameter and will provide 7.2 MG of CSO storage. The Elliott West CSO control facilities will receive and treat flows from the Mercer Street pipeline, and will include a 250-million-gallons-per-day (MGD) pump station. Treated flows will flow by gravity through a 2,950-foot-long, 96-inch-diameter pipeline to the Elliott West outfall, which will extend 500 feet offshore and discharge in 60 to 70 feet of water. Overflows from the Denny Way diversion structure will flow by gravity to the Elliott West CSO control facilities through a separate 3,050-foot-long, 84-inch-diameter pipeline. Conveyance facilities to be constructed in the South Lake Union area include a tunnel regulator station, pipelines, and diversion structures. The design called for microtunneling and pipe jacking for approximately 1,750 feet of 72- and 78-inch-diameter pipe and several large underground diversion structures. The South Lake Union Pipeline required extensive construction planning and sequencing to accommodate construction in a high traffic area.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Bellevue, Washington Prime Consultant

13 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 4 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Strategic Tunnel Enhancement Programme (STEP) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Deep Tunnels for Sustainable Used Water System, Abu Dhabi 2007-Present 2025 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Abu Dhabi Sewerage Service Alan Thomas +971 (2) 694 7300 Company 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) The programme comprises a new deep tunnel extending over 40km from the existing main pumping station on Abu Dhabi Island across to the mainland, terminating at the Al Wathba Independent Sewage Treatment Plant currently under construction. The deep tunnel is divided into three contracts: Contract T-01 is 16,050m, Contract T-02 is 15,500m and Contract T-03 will be 9,700m. The depth of the tunnels from existing ground level to invert level varies as T-01 tunnel from approximately 25m below ground level (bgl) to 36m bgl, T-02 tunnel from 36m bgl to 62m bgl and T-03 tunnel from 62m bgl to 80m bgl. Internal tunnel diameters - 4m (T01), 5m (T02) and 5.5m (T03). A number of shafts will be constructed along the tunnel alignment that will serve both as launch and receptions shafts for the TBMs. The shafts will be used for feeding the TBMs with supplies and muck away, as well as supplying materials to construct the secondary lining within the tunnel. The breakdown of the shafts to be constructed under the three tunnel contracts is: Contract T-01 – 5 Work Shafts and 3 Access Shafts. The work shafts will be formed by diaphragm wall techniques to a full depth extending over 15m below the tunnel depth, with an internal diameter of varying from approximately 13m to 17m, with provision of soft eye for TBM breakthrough. The Access Shafts will be formed by diaphragm wall techniques with an internal diameter of 6m. Within both type of shafts permanent shafts will be built. Such shafts will be built using pre-cast concrete segments lined with HDPE with an internal diameter of 3m for maintenance access and 6m diameter for hydraulic and maintenance access. Additionally, two hydraulic vortex drop structures will be built with diameters of 0.3m and 0.5m within two of the shafts. Contract T-02 – 3 Work Shafts and 3 Access Shafts. The work shafts will be formed by diaphragm wall techniques to a full depth extending over 15m below the tunnel depth, with an internal diameter of approximately 15m and soft eye for TBM breakthrough. The Access Shafts will be formed by diaphragm wall techniques with an internal diameter of 6m. Within both type of shafts permanent shafts will be built. Such shafts will be built using pre-cast concrete segments lined with HDPE with an internal diameter of 3m for maintenance access and 6m diameter for hydraulic and maintenance access. Additionally, provision will be made for two expected future hydraulic vortex drop structures, built with diameters of 2m within two of the shafts. Contract T-03 – 2 Work Shafts and 2 Access Shafts. The work shafts will be formed by diaphragm wall techniques to a full depth extending over 15m below the tunnel depth, with an internal diameter of approximately 15m and soft eye for TBM breakthrough. The Access Shafts will be formed by diaphragm wall techniques with an internal diameter of 6m. Within both type of shafts permanent shafts will be built. Such shafts will be built using pre-cast concrete segments lined with HDPE with an internal diameter of 3m for maintenance access and 6m diameter for hydraulic and maintenance access.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Abu Dhabi Prime Consultant

14 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 5 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Lake Mead Intake No. 3, Las Vegas, Nevada PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2004-Present 2013 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Southern Nevada Water Authority Marcus Jenson, Director of 702.862.3400 Engineering 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) This deep water intake project consisted of the following elements:

 A 3.5-mile tunnel constructed by a tunnel boring machine (TBM) 300 feet below lake surface elevation at the time of design

 A 2,000-foot drill-and-blast constructed tunnel to connect the new intake into the existing Intake Pump Station No. 2

 A 14-by-16-foot isolation gate

 New 600-mgd intake pump station MW/CH2M HILL staff worked closely with SNWA to develop a contracting strategy for the $800 million Lake Mead Intake No. 3 Intake Tunnel No. 3 will involve a deep program. It was decided to issue the TBM tunnel as a design- pressurized face tunnel below Lake Mead build procurement so that the contractor could work closely with the designer. The MW/CH2M HILL team developed the technical requirements for the design-build procurement and is providing support during construction. The other tunnels, gate structure, and pumping station were designed by MW/CH2M HILL for standard design-bid-build procurement. During construction, the design team developed detailed blasting requirements and worked with the contractors to develop blasting and monitoring programs to ensure no harm would occur to nearby operating facilities. Also, a semi- qualitative risk management program was developed, which included identifying potential risks, developing mitigation measures, and tracking progress. Based on recent market changes, including sharply reduced funding and lower system demands, MW/CH2M HILL worked closely with SNWA to develop cost-saving measures for the Intake No. 3 system. This included prioritizing project components, eliminating or deferring several proposed facilities, and re-designing some project aspects to facilitate future construction. CH2M HILL led the underground design aspects of the Intake No. 3 project. This included detailed rock strength, stability, and wedge analyses for the large underground structures.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Las Vegas, NV Subconsultant

15 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 6 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED University Link (U-Link) Construction Management, Seattle, WA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2008-on-going 2016 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Sound Transit Behrooz Emam, U-Link Deputy 206.398.5394 Project Director 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

 Contract amount: $61.3 million  Schedule: March 2008 to present  Specific Role: Lead Construction Manager  Construction Cost: $1 billion to $1.5 billion Sound Transit’s University Link (U-Link) project is a 3.15 mile light rail extension that will run in twin-bored tunnels from Downtown Seattle north to the University of Washington, with stations at Capitol Hill and on the University of Washington campus near the Husky football stadium.

CH2M HILL and Jacobs are established a joint venture to perform construction management services for this transit project. These services included resident engineering, inspection, project controls, cost estimating, and contract administration. Descriptions of these contracts are below. The U-Link Project is a critical element of the Sound Move Link Light Rail program. This segment connects the two most dense and transit dependent CBDs in the region—Downtown Seattle and the University District. When completed, the U-Link will be the most important single segment in terms of ridership, connectivity, and complexity. When complete, the U-Link segment will connect with Link Light Rail to create a direct connection to SEATAC Airport.

University Link will serve the three largest urban centers in the state of Washington – Downtown Seattle, Capitol Hill and the University District. By 2030, the University Link line alone is projected to add 70,000 boardings a day to the light rail system.

No other single segment is more critical to completing the Sound Move plan or to preparing for ST2 than the construction of this project. All the complexities one could imagine are present in the U-Link Project. There will be multiple contract packages for stations and deep tunneling in a dense urban environment, in soft soils, under two major freeways and a canal, sandwiched between other significant infrastructure projects planned to be in construction during the U-Link Project. The following are CM contracts for University Link:

U210 – Advanced Utility Relocation - UW Station: Removal and relocation of utilities and site restoration in preparation for the major tunnel and close coordination with University of Washington, City of Seattle, and other project stakeholders. CH2M HILL and Granite jointly created a partnering atmosphere with Sound Transit and all stakeholders to manage increased scope and to meet schedule obligations to maintain the critical path schedule for the follow-on tunnel contract.

U211 – Demolition and Environmental Remediation – Capitol Hill Station: Abatement of hazardous materials, demolition of existing structures, and disposal of materials within a highly dense urban environment. CH2M HILL was successful in managing this work with minimal impacts to the local community.

U215 – I-5 Undercrossing Construction Pits: Construction of four shafts along I-5 that will facilitate the removal of iti lid il f th t d t l fil CH2M HILL t ff id d t i di ti ith WSDOT 16 to minimize impacts and maintain safety to the traveling public and protect existing retaining structures.

U220 – Bored Tunnels: Two 11,400-foot-long bored tunnels to be excavated using earth pressure balance tunnel bore machines (TBM), and 16 cross passages. The contract includes civil and structural work at the access roads, underground utilities, ground improvement, and a large slurry wall for both the station and rail crossover.

U230 – Capitol Hill Tunnels and Station: Construction of a large open excavation for the Capitol Hill Station and two 3,800-foot-long TBM driven tunnels from Capitol Hill to Downtown Seattle. The contract combines a very complex tunnel alignment along with the challenges of tunneling in a highly urbanized metropolitan center.

U250 – University of Washington Station: A General Contractor/Construction Manager (GC/CM) contract that includes completion of the station box excavation, floors, stairs, mezzanines, elevators, the aboveground entrance to the station, and a pedestrian bridge. U820 – LRT Storage Yard Expansion: A $13-million expansion that included subgrade, under drains, ballasted concrete tie track work and concrete tie turnouts, asphalt paving, continuous welded pressure and thermite rail welds, traction power substation switchgear, traction power feeders, voltage presence detection, fiber optics, negative rail return, rail bonding, signal wiring, automatic power switches, overhead contact wire, and switch heaters.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Bellevue, Washington JV Partner 1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE b. Jacobs Civil Bellevue, Washington JV Partner

17 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 7 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Construction Management, King County, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Washington 2005-present 2011 (est.) 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER King County Department of Judy Cochran, Program Manager 206.205.1459 Natural Resources 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

The King County Wastewater Treatment Division is making major improvements to its regional sewage treatment system, which are needed to handle rapid population growth in the greater Seattle/Puget Sound region. The Wastewater Treatment Division serves 17 cities, 17 local sewer agencies, and more than 1.4 million residents in King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties.

King County is building Brightwater to serve the growing population in south Snohomish County and north King County. Without Brightwater's wastewater treatment capacity, the region risks sewage overflows and a moratorium on new construction in both counties.

King County's Brightwater Conveyance project includes construction of approximately 13 miles of large-bore tunnels to provide flows of sewerage to and effluent from the Brightwater Treatment Plant. The 13 miles of the tunneled Conveyance system spans east to west across the northern portion of King County, and consists of four major tunnels and four shaft sites. Key elements for this complex project include deep slurry wall shafts, tunnel construction by a tunnel-boring machine (TBM) from shafts, long soft-ground tunnels requiring slurry shield TBMs in high-pressure environments and earth pressure balance (EPB) TBMs, long microtunnels in soft ground, and high-capacity wastewater pump stations.

The Brightwater Conveyance Construction Management project involves the following tasks:

 Make recommendations with regard to communications with the contractors and contract administration matters  Prepare a project plan for the work to be performed, including staffing plan, communication protocol, QC plan, standards, and documentation  Prepare monthly progress reports, including work currently completed and future work scheduled, review of schedule and budget, and identify critical issues and proposed solutions  Establish and implement a Safety Program  Develop and implement a quality assurance program for construction management  Assist the County to develop and maintain a program-level schedule for each portion of this Conveyance project using Primavera (P3) schedule software  Update existing construction cost estimates based on in-depth understanding of project scope, anticipated means and methods of construction, and research involving pricing and cost escalation  Create state-of-the-art web-based communications software for project documentation and written communications  Develop procedures, manuals, systems, and related documentation, including contract specifications and document logs  Perform constructibility reviews of the construction contracts, including plans and specifications  Prepare a construction management plan that includes procedures, work flow processes, and roles and responsibilities to provide high-quality documentation  Provide community relations services, including review of existing public relations plans, and facilitate meetings with County community relations staff to develop strategies for community involvement and emergency response  Perform contract administration services, including pre-construction coordination; implement, manage, and maintain the submittal management and change order management systems; review contract progress to

18 determine status of work for payment purposes; and provide assistance to the County when construction claims are anticipated  Provide inspection and resident engineering services, including field and offsite inspection, monitoring compliance with permit conditions, and coordinating with permitting agencies

Because the Brightwater Conveyance project is a technically challenging tunneling project, it requires extensive safety planning into the means and methods of construction, including detailed coordination and planning with emergency response agencies. The tunnels will be constructed in environments where the tunnels experience high hydrostatic heads that require sophisticated equipment and procedures to protect personnel and equipment.

Subsurface Utilities Engineering

 Subsurface utility engineering for existing and as-built utilities  Extensive utility coordination with utility providers and regulatory agencies  Use of 3D modeling and visualization tools, including InRoads

The CH2M HILL-led team worked with King County to design and is now providing services during construction for Brightwater, a new $467 million regional wastewater treatment facility that will serve the northern portion of the County’s wastewater service area.

The Brightwater project includes a state-of-the-art advanced wastewater treatment and reclamation facility, 12 miles of underground Conveyance pipelines, and a marine outfall in Puget Sound. The 80-acre treatment plant site, reclaimed from automobile wrecking yards, is being transformed into a park-like area incorporating streams, wetlands, trails, overlook structures, and even an environmental education/community center and energy technology demonstration facility.

The four–phase Brightwater project included (1) providing public outreach assistance to King County for siting the new wastewater treatment plant, (2) selecting the appropriate plant site and preparing an EIS, (3) designing the new treatment plant, and (4) providing comprehensive engineering services during construction.

This project included extensive utility work and the preparation of more than 6,000 drawings and supporting specifications, organized into multiple contract packages. CH2M HILL provided assistance to the County for coordination with utility purveyors and regulatory agencies. SUE was provided for existing and as-built utilities. The design team made extensive use of 3D visualization tools to enable County staff to optimize facility layouts for functionality and ease of maintenance. For example, all yard piping was 3D modeled during design using InRoads. The 3D model files also were provided to the construction contractors to aid in planning and execution of their work. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Bellevue, Washington Subconsutlant

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE b. Jacobs Civil Bellevue, Washington Prime

19 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 8 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening and SR 515 Interchange Design- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Build 2009-present 2011 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER WSDOT Lisa Hodgson 425.496.2038 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) CH2M HILL is currently providing design and construction services to WSDOT through the two-party joint venture, I-405 Corridor Design Builders (CDB), for the Renton Stage 2 DB project. The project consists of a new half-diamond interchange on I-405 at SR 515 (Talbot Road), improved access ramps to the I-405 interchanges at SR 167 and SR 169, construction of one additional auxiliary lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, and reconstruction of the Benson Road Bridge over I-405. Unique structures on the project include the following: Benson Road Bridge Replacement: This 520-foot-long bridge features a 3-span, spliced, post-tensioned precast girder bridge using the first application of WF100PTG girders in the state, with a maximum span length of 207 feet. Southbound Off-Ramp Bridge: This two-span prestressed girder bridge was designed using WF58G girders for a curved alignment and includes design of an integral straddle bent at the interior pier. Currently in construction, the bridges also feature aesthetic treatments in accordance with I-405 corridor urban design guidelines. Both bridges were designed to current WSDOT displacement-based seismic design criteria, and were designed on a 4-month fast-track schedule. The project also includes stream habitat restoration and design and construction of 12 retaining walls of various types, including structural earth, soil nail, gravity block, and concrete cantilever. Urban Environment. The Renton Stage 2 project is developed in accordance with the Urban Design Criteria established for the I-405 Corridor. This includes aesthetic geometric criteria for size and scale and patterns on all retaining walls, bridge elements, railings, a specified pallet of landscape materials. This is the first major project in the corridor designed with the distinctive horizontal tops and vertical steps on all retaining and noise walls. American Disability Act (ADA) criteria was employed in this urban environment where excessive grades on sidewalks were a challenge. The CH2M HILL design team brought a national perspective to work in collaboration with WSDOT teams to provide ADA accessible primary routes and document maximum extent feasible for other features. Risk Management and Mitigation. The Renton Stage 2 work site contained three differing site conditions: 1) contaminated soils in a civic dump, 2) an abandoned coal mine under the freeway with a dilapidated culvert, and 3) loose unconfined fills with liquefiable potential. All three where within the core areas of construction and had significant risk of delaying the entire project if not addressed in a timely and collaborative approach. The integrated management team of designers and builders met with WSDOT teams to brainstorm options, reach consensus, adjust schedules, and develop phased workplans to manage risks and keep the construction on track. Self-Directed QA/QC Program. CH2M HILL’s Quality Manager, Don Kogle, developed the self-directed QA/QC program (Quality Management Plan [QMP]) from CH2M HILL’s experience on the I-5, Everett HOV Lanes and more than eight additional DB projects across the country. The self-directed plan covers all design development and construction processes. Both design and construction team self reported more issues (NCRs) than WSDOT reported (NCIs). In all cases, matters were resolved to the satisfaction of WSDOT QA and often resulted in additional refinements to the QMP. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Bellevue, Washington JV Partner 20 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 9 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED I-5 Everett HOV Lanes Design-Build PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2005-2009 2009 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER WSDOT Mike Cotten, Program Manager 206.770.3570 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) CH2M HILL was in a joint venture on this $224-million design-build contract. This project was the largest design-build project WSDOT had ever undertaken.I-5 HOV lanes were extended more than 10 miles, 6 miles northbound and 4.5 miles southbound, between SR 526 and US 2 and added a northbound and southbound auxiliary (or merge) lane on I-5 from 41st Street to US 2. The project improved freeway on-ramps to include all utility, drainage, and environmental and aesthetic landscaping. Pavement types included hot mix asphalt and Portland Cement Concrete. The project included widening or replacing 23 bridges; improving ramps and exits, lighting, signage, and surveillance; and installing noise walls and ramp meters. The structures work included the following:  Add northbound HOV lanes to I-5 from SR 526 to US 2, add southbound HOV lanes to I-5  Add a northbound and southbound auxiliary (or merge) lane on I-5 from 41st Street to US 2  Widen or replace 23 bridges, including a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad bridge  Improve freeway on-ramps and exits; for example, an existing left-hand off-ramp to Broadway Avenue will be replaced with a right-hand flyover concrete and steel girder bridge  Install noise walls at sensitive locations  Treat 100 percent of existing and future impervious surface runoff within the project limits with six new enhanced treatment water quality facilities  Improve or add lighting and surveillance, control and driver information and improve components such as driver messaging signs, traffic cameras, and ramp meters Schedule: Before WSDOT expanded the project scope, the CH2M HILL team anticipated completion in late 2007, (6 months earlier than the June 29, 2008 completion deadline) for this 3-year project. With the scope expansion, completion complied with the original June 29, 2008 completion date. Safety: The firm places a high priority on safety and is party to a general trade union labor agreement that includes conditions to adhere to the team’s Everett HOV Project Safety Plan, thereby ensuring complete team commitment to a safety culture. The safety plan function reports outside of organization production forces to the JV Management Committee. It includes safety representatives from each subcontractor and a safety Committee composed of field personnel. CH2M HILL’s “Target Zero” safety program is strictly adhered to and the safety culture that the firm developed in its work force provides a focused example to other contractors. Quality Assurance: A quarterly status is published with WSDOT that quantitatively summarizes performance in cost, quality oversight, schedule, design and construction progress, environmental compliance and public information. Monthly overviews graphically summarize cash flow, progress to date, quality assurance/control/verification (QA/QC/QV) numerically along with a detailed description of critical path items.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Bellevue, Washington JV Partner 21 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 10 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Central Link Light Rail, Segment C735 Final Design and Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) During Construction 2000-2010 2010 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Sound Transit Tony Raben 206.398.5000 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) CH2M HILL was the prime consultant for the final design of approximately 4.3 miles of at-grade double-track guideway light rail through the Rainier Valley in South Seattle. CH2M HILL provided civil engineering final design and construction support services for the road and track alignments, stations, pedestrian crossing, retaining walls, intersection plans, drainage, and utility relocations. Design work included road and track alignments, utility relocation, right-of-way (ROW) plans, traffic signal and signage plans, light rail transit (LRT) systems plans (including traction power, communications, duct banks, and station systems), station architecture, drainage plans, and intersection plans. CH2M HILL prepared the final design and complete plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for these segments to issue for construction bids. During construction, in addition to traditional design support services, CH2M HILL provided field engineering and oversight for the drainage, utilities, and roa dway project elements. The firm also provided as-constructed surveys of critical elements of the project such as the rails, station platforms and canopies, and centenary poles to ensure the proper clearance between them and the rail cars. Prior to working on the Final Design, CH2M HILL worked on the EIS as a subconsultant. CH2M HILL supported public hearings and agency reviews, and held shared responsibility for project management, transportation, and land use. The firm’s responsibilities included environmental justice, parklands/4(f), archaeology, economics, neighborhood studies, and air quality analysis.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. CH2M HILL Bellevue, Washington Prime Consultant

22 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS (Fill in "Example Projects Key" section below before completing PERSONNEL CONTRACT table. Place "X" under project key number for (From Section E, (From Section E, participation in same or similar role.) Block 12) Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Deputy Resident Engineer - X X Derek Dugan Tunnel Roger Johnson Chief Tunnel Inspector X X Clifford Feurtado Tunnel Inspector XX Steven Hunt On-Call Expertise XX X Monitoring/Instrumentation

Donald Olson Engineer

29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F)

1 London Tideway Tunnels Integrated 6 University Link (U-Link) Construction Delivery Partner, London, England Management, Seattle, WA Singapore Deep Tunnel Sewerage System Brightwater Conveyance Construction 2 and Infrastructure Construction Program, 7 Management, King County, Washington Singapore Denny Way/Lake Union CSO Program and I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening and SR 515 3 Construction Management, King County, 8 Interchange Design-Build Seattle, WA Strategic Tunnel Enhancement Programme (STEP) 4 9 I-5 Everett HOV Lanes Design-Build Deep Tunnels for Sustainable Used Water System, Abu Dhabi

5 Lake Mead Intake No. 3, Las Vegas, 10 Central Link Light Rail, Segment C735 Final Nevada Design and Services During Construction STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 4

23

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. CH2M HILL Tunnel Qualifications As an employee-owned full-service consulting, program management, design, construction, and operations firm, CH2M HILL has a long history managing some of the world’s largest infrastructure projects. With US$6.3 billion in revenue and more than 23,500 employees worldwide, CH2M HILL helps clients develop and manage infrastructure and facilities to improve efficiency, safety, and quality of life. CH2M HILL is an industry- leading program management, construction management, and design firm as ranked by Engineering News- Record (2010). In addition, CH2M HILL receives regular recognition and honors for our successful delivery of CM services. The Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) has awarded CH2M HILL 10 Project Achievement Awards in the last 5 years. We also have received five project awards from regional construction magazines. The firm employs more than 100 professional tunneling staff in North America, providing expertise in: 1) planning and design for tunnel project delivery; 2) tunnel program management; and 3) tunnel project construction management. These staff members have delivered tunneling projects across North America and around the world in nearly all ranges of ground condition--from cohesive residual soils to glacial till and granular alluvium and from weak chalk and mudstones to hard metamorphic rock. Our tunneling staff have an average of 23 years of experience, with experience ranging from entry level to over 35 years. A recent internal tunneling skills survey indicated the following distribution of CH2M HILL tunneling specializations: ¾ 9% - Tunnel-trenchless engineering specialists ¾ 19%- Geotechnical engineers with shaft and trenchless experience ¾ 8% - Pipeline engineers with major trenchless experience ¾ 13%- Tunnel or pipeline project managers ¾ 32% - Tunnel/underground construction managers ¾ 8% - Construction cost estimators with tunnel experience ¾ 11% - Tunnel-heavy construction inspectors

CH2M HILL has approximately 30 years of significant experience in tunnel project planning, program management, preliminary engineering, design, and construction management. Through this experience, our tunnel engineers have developed innovative, risk adverse, cost effective approaches to tunnel design and construction for water and wastewater conveyance with increasing numbers of energy, mining and transportation projects in recent years. Our tunnel experience spans from small (1-foot) diameter auger boring, horizontal directional drilling and microtunneling to large diameter (32 foot) tunnel boring machine (TBM) driven tunnels in soil and rock. We have experience in pulling HDPE pipe with horizontal directional drilling, jacking pipe of all types, pilot tube guided installations, two pass casing and carrier pipe installations, pressurized face tunneling with precast concrete segments, TBM, hand mine, and rotary milling-head tunneling with cast in place concrete linings. We have designed numerous large chambers in rock with linings ranging from rock bolts with minimal shotcrete to cast-in-place concrete. Tunnel Project Locations Our trenchless and tunneling projects have been located across North America and globally in nearly all ranges of ground conditions from cohesive residual soils to glacial till and granular alluvium and from weak chalk and mudstones to hard metamorphic rock.

I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE January 25, 2011

33. NAME AND TITLE John Conrad, Highway Market Segment Lead 37 ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS

PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION

1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) SR99 Bored Tunnel Construction Management Services 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER

B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT

4. NAME AND TITLE Lars Babendererde 5. NAME OF FIRM Babendererde Engineers, LLC 6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 253-630-2221/360-844-5027 dir 360-844-5563 [email protected] C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check)

9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT J-V PRIME SUBCON- PARTNER TRACTOR

Tunnel and TBM Design Review, Babendererde Engineers, LLC PO Box 872437 Expert Advice on TBMs, Geotechnical a. x Vancouver, WA 98687-2437 Engineering Support and Inspection, Hyperbaric Specialists

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE

D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM  (Attached)

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 1

1 1 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Lars Babendererde On-call Expertise a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 23 20 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) BABENDERERDE ENGINEERS LLC; Vancouver WA

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Mechanical Engineer, Dipl.-Ing., German degree comparable to MSc n/a

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Lars has 20 years of experience in the TBM and tunneling industry. While attending Friedberg University he worked for contractors on tunneling job sites, for guidance system manufacturers and TBM manufacturers. Being a founding partner of Babendererde Engineers, he acted as specialist engineer for contractors and clients. Assignments varied from consulting services, design projects and design reviews to practical production management involving multiple TBMs at one project. Lars assisted contractors by consulting with regard TBMs in difficult situations or to remobilize stuck TBMs. Currently he is member of international design review board and technical committee on large scale projects. His ongoing involvement in challenging projects allowed him to publish more than 20 papers as well as conduct lectures in workshops and post- academic education programs. He is the current lead (“Animateur”) of working group 14 “Mechanized Tunneling” of the International Tunneling Association ITA and member of the following professional organizations: UCA of SME (Underground Construction Association of Society of Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration), STUVA (German Society for Underground Traffic Tunnels), BTS (British Tunneling Society).

3 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Road Tunnel Port of Miami Tunnel Project, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) ongoing ongoing (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of the highway connection between the Port of Miami / Cruise Ship Terminal and Watson Island under the Port Channel. Twin a. tunnels with double lanes in each direction connected by three (3) cross passages. Tunnels have an external diameter of 39 feet leading through coarse sands and lime stone. The tunnels will be excavated by one (1) Earth Pressure Balanced Tunnel Boring Machine (EPB-TBM). BE is part of the CM JV and will be responsible for the initial tunnel lining quality and the EPB-TBM monitoring. The main contract is based on a public/private partnership and requests as well from the CM team to adjust to the special conditions in ownership and design responsibilities. Ramp excavation for the TBMs has already started and the TBM excavation is expected to begin late 2011. The current work consistsof reviewing design submittals, development of the future quality control program below ground, production control of the segments in the factory and status check for the TBM production.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Metro Barcelona and Suburbs, Spain PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) ongoing since 2008 ongoing (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Various construction contracts to increase the metro capacity of the Barcelona Metropolitan Region (Line 9 in Barcelona, Metro Terrassa and b. Metro Sabadell) totaling to about 19 miles of tunnels under construction. The tunnels are excavated by seven (7) EPB-TBMs ranging up to 40 ft. in diameter and in different contracts. GISA is the public body to coordinate and manage all metro construction works within the metropolitan region. BE works in JV for GISA as specialists in mechanized tunneling to support the client through all phases of the contract. This involves assistance during equipment acceptance tests, submittal review (operational parameters, etc.), as well as assistance in difficult situations. Additional services include data monitoring of all TBMs and commenting on the forward planning of the TBM operations. Lars is part of the BE review team working together with the Spanish JV partner and supported by the software TPC.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Railway Tunnel Hållandsas, Sweden PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) ongoing since 2005 ongoing since 2004 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm c. Construction of a new high speed connection along the West Coast of Sweden. Two (2) parallel tunnels with a total length of 5.5 mi and a bore diameter of 35 ft. The geology is mainly of fractured gneiss with water head of up to 188 PSI combined with high permeability. Two (2) x 3.42 mi long tunnel drives with a Dual-Mode TBM to operate as hard rock shielded TBM or as softground Slurry-TBM. One larger rock fault will be passed under the protection of 600 ft. long ground freezing section. Lars is member of the “Technical Committee” who advises independently on both contractual sides on technical matters. At this time the work consists of regular tunnel/progress inspections. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Sacramento River Delta Habitat and Conveyance Program, Sacramento, CA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) ongoing not defined (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Development of transfer structure through the delta area to improve the water supply to Southern California. Geology consists of soft, water d. bearing ground, mainly sands and silts. Comparison of different solutions involving tunnels with a cover of approx. 150 ft. Proposed tunnels have an outer diameter of 37 ft. single pass lining. The total length of the twin tunnels varies between 2 miles to 43 miles, depending on the solution. Further challenges are the vertical tunnel alignment, depending on the face support system during excavation and the high internal pressures after commissioning. Lars is part of the “Independent Review Committee” (IRC), executing design review missions. He is concentrating specifically on the TBM issues with regard to the practical operation, face support, time schedules, lining possibilities and site dimensions. The first review is at the 60% design level. The second review is scheduled for in the year 2011.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Road Tunnel SMART, Stormwater Management and Road Tunnel, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2006 2007 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm PPP-project for a combined tunnel of storm water trunk and toll road in downtown Kuala Lumpur.The tunnel has a total length of six (6) miles, e. of which 1.9 miles are used for a double deck road tunnel section. The idea is to ease traffic flows in the city during normal time and to allow an enhanced water control during Monsoon, during which the tunnel is closed for the traffic. The tunnel is mainly in karstic limestone below the groundwater table. The karst cavities with volumes exceeding 130 cubic yards required extensive exploration and grouting programs. The partly open, but partly water and slime filled cavities posed a big challenge to the two (2) nearly identical Slurry-TBMs with an outer diameter of 43.3 ft. Lars supported the project with proposals to establish the geophysical and geotechnical exploration program and with means to ease the compressed air interventions. Later he supported one (1) Contractor with engineering services during a legal dispute. The software TPC for data monitoring and visualization was an integral part of the service.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Road Tunnel “Herrentunnel” under the river “Trave”, Lübeck, Germany PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2006 2006 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of a highway tunnel under the river “Trave” as replacement for an old bascule bridge in the framework of a PPP concession. The f. vertical tunnel alignment was adjusted to match between the existing road junctions,resulting in 6 % grades. Two parallel tunnels, each with an outer diameter of 37 ft and a length of 0.7 mi and connected by two cross passages excavated under the protection of ground freezing.The general geological strata is of sands, silts, clays with embedded boulders due to glacial influence. The tunnels were excavated by a Slurry- TBM. The lining consists of a one pass single lining with reinforced concrete segments and gaskets. Impact protection walls support the structure against accidents. Larsserved as an expert engineer within the concession givers engineering team with responsibility for the TBM operations and tunnel lining quality. He leaded the BE team during the assignment and in respect to the settlement measurement system (especially below the bridge pillars), claim checking and quality control with support of TPC software.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Road Tunnel “Wesertunnel” under the river “Weser” close to Bremen, Germany PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2003 2002 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of a highway connection consisting of two parallel tunnels and four cross passages with two lanes and one emergency lane each. g. The tunnels were excavated with a 38 ft. Slurry-TBM. The geology consisted of soft peat, hard and plastic clays and sands with embedded boulders with sizes up to 6 ft. The cross passages were excavated with conventional means as well below the river under the protection of ground freezing. Frequent manual interventions in front of the TBM were required. Face support pressure in the working chamber up to 72 PSI. BE supplied design services and assisted during the construction as expert engineer for the TBM operations.Topics were the sensitive levees which had to be passed with shallow overburden, the means and methods for the interventions into the excavation chamber, the damages due to abrasive ground and as well later claim checks. Lars lead the BE team during this project.

4 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 1 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Philipp Elsner TBM operations, Compressed Air, Monitoring a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 9 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) BABENDERERDE ENGINEERS LLC

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Civil Engineer, M.Sc., Iowa State University n/a Civil Engineer, Dipl.-Ing., German Degree comparable to MSc

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Fifteen (15) years of experience in design and construction management for large international tunnel infrastructure projects with all types of soft ground and hard rock TBMs in diverse geologies in urban and rural areas. Experience stretches over all areas of engineering and consulting work from pre-design studies until construction and claim management for large diameter and as well as pipe jacking projects at road, railway, sewer and utility applications. In-depth knowledge of face support technology, bolted segmental precast liner systems with gaskets, compressed air works and data management and interpretation for tunnel drives.

3 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Túnel GASTAU, Caraguatatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of a 3.4 mi long dead-end tunnel with a 21 feet Hard-Rock-Double-Shield TBM. The tunnel has a 3% upwards inclination. The first 1200 ft. of the tunnel had been conventionally constructed as a starter tunnel for the TBM. a. Ground conditions are granite and gneiss with occasional faulting. Water with a head of approx. 600 PSI might be present to the end of the tunnel drive. Philipp performs as the Lead of a Construction Management team where he is responsible for monitoring the tunneling operations, QA of tunnel lining quality and the geological classification. Special attention must be paid to the surveillance of the TBM operation via real-time based TBM data analysis and incoming geological information from several ahead probing systems. Joint design of an extensive ahead probing and injection strategy to counteract fractured rock, shear zones and high pressured or intensive ground water inflows.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED HerrentunnelLübeck, Germany PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2005 2005 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of a highway tunnel under the river “Trave” as replacement for an old bascule bridge. Alignment between the existing road b. junctions with 6 % inclinations. Two parallel tunnels, each with an outer diameter of 39 ft and a length of 0.7 mi and connected by two cross passages excavated under the protection of ground freezing. Use of a one pass single lining with reinforced concrete segments with gaskets. Philipp served as an expert engineer within the concession givers engineering team with responsibility for the TBM operations and tunnel lining quality. Outside of the tunnel he observed the installation of a settlement measurement system. He was later involved in the claim checking, using amongst others TBM data analysis software (TPC), under consideration of the special responsibility distribution within a PPP concession.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Inntal Railway H3-4, Brixlegg, Austria PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2009 2009 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of the Northern approach tunnels to the Brenner Alp Crossing for high speed railway. Excavation of double track tunnel with a length of approx. 2.5 miles and a boring diameter of 41 foot. Project geology in coarse sands and gravels. Alignment passing under a river, c. two railway tracks and one highway. Philipp temporarily performed geotechnical construction management services at the side of the Contractor (special requirement by the main contract). This work enclosed geological mapping, monitoring of the tunneling operations and control of the settlement measurements and elaboration of technical statements for the Contractor. He covered during his deployment to the job site the large Slurry-TBM excavating the main tunnel. He also participated in compressed air interventions into the cutter head. Additionally he supported the permanent CM team in conducting face support calculations for the tunnel alignment. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Railway Tunnel Nodo de Bologna, Italy PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2005 2005 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm d. Specialist Engineer during the excavation process for the TBMs in respect to the overall quality control, settlement and operations during construction of twin railway tunnels for the approach of the high-speed rail link into the main station of Bologna. Total length of each tunnel is 3.8 mi, excavated with two (2) EPB-TBMs with a 30 ft. dia.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Elbe-Link Highway Tunnel, Germany PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2008 N.A. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Design work for a tunnel crossing under Elbe River in course of the extension of the Highway 20 Western ring around the City of Hamburg. Feasibility study for different solutions including High Level Bridge, Submersed Tunnel and Bored Tunnel. Technical documentation for e. planning approval under consideration of different alignment variations. Execution of the pre-design (~ 60 %) for all structures including cross passages, ramps and trenches for two parallel 3.8 mi long and 45 ft. wide bored tunnels plus 21 cross passages in conventional manner. Glacial influenced geology, mainly containing sands, marl, silt and clay. Ground layers with embedded stones and boulders. Ground water with high contents of salt and ammonium changing due to tidal influence. Philipp worked together with the other design JV team members, specifically on the part of elaboration of the vertical and horizontal alignment, stability and buoyancy calculations for the segment design, settlement monitoring and mitigation procedures for the crossing of sensitive structures, site allocation and material transport. He coordinated the design work for the BabendererdeEngineers team.

4 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 3 1 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Philipp Elsner TBM operations, Compressed Air, Monitoring a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 9 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) BABENDERERDE ENGINEERS LLC

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Civil Engineer, M.Sc., Iowa State University n/a Civil Engineer, Dipl.-Ing., German Degree comparable to MSc

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Fifteen (15) years of experience in design and construction management for large international tunnel infrastructure projects with all types of soft ground and hard rock TBMs in diverse geologies in urban and rural areas. Experience stretches over all areas of engineering and consulting work from pre-design studies until construction and claim management for large diameter and as well as pipe jacking projects at road, railway, sewer and utility applications. In-depth knowledge of face support technology, bolted segmental precast liner systems with gaskets, compressed air works and data management and interpretation for tunnel drives.

3 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Túnel GASTAU, Caraguatatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2011 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of a 3.4 mi long dead-end tunnel with a 21 feet Hard-Rock-Double-Shield TBM. The tunnel has a 3% upwards inclination. The first 1200 ft. of the tunnel had been conventionally constructed as a starter tunnel for the TBM. a. Ground conditions are granite and gneiss with occasional faulting. Water with a head of approx. 600 PSI might be present to the end of the tunnel drive. Philipp performs as the Lead of a Construction Management team where he is responsible for monitoring the tunneling operations, QA of tunnel lining quality and the geological classification. Special attention must be paid to the surveillance of the TBM operation via real-time based TBM data analysis and incoming geological information from several ahead probing systems. Joint design of an extensive ahead probing and injection strategy to counteract fractured rock, shear zones and high pressured or intensive ground water inflows.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED HerrentunnelLübeck, Germany PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of a highway tunnel under the river “Trave” as replacement for an old bascule bridge. Alignment between the existing road b. junctions with 6 % inclinations. Two parallel tunnels, each with an outer diameter of 39 ft and a length of 0.7 mi and connected by two cross passages excavated under the protection of ground freezing. Use of a one pass single lining with reinforced concrete segments with gaskets. Philipp served as an expert engineer within the concession givers engineering team with responsibility for the TBM operations and tunnel lining quality. Outside of the tunnel he observed the installation of a settlement measurement system. He was later involved in the claim checking, using amongst others TBM data analysis software (TPC), under consideration of the special responsibility distribution within a PPP concession.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Inntal Railway H3-4, Brixlegg, Austria PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2006-2009 2006-2009 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Construction of the Northern approach tunnels to the Brenner Alp Crossing for high speed railway. Excavation of double track tunnel with a length of approx. 2.5 miles and a boring diameter of 41 foot. Project geology in coarse sands and gravels. Alignment passing under a river, c. two railway tracks and one highway. Philipp temporarily performed geotechnical construction management services at the side of the Contractor (special requirement by the main contract). This work enclosed geological mapping, monitoring of the tunneling operations and control of the settlement measurements and elaboration of technical statements for the Contractor. He covered during his deployment to the job site the large Slurry-TBM excavating the main tunnel. He also participated in compressed air interventions into the cutter head. Additionally he supported the permanent CM team in conducting face support calculations for the tunnel alignment. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Railway Tunnel Nodo de Bologna, Italy PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm d. Specialist Engineer during the excavation process for the TBMs in respect to the overall quality control, settlement and operations during construction of twin railway tunnels for the approach of the high-speed rail link into the main station of Bologna. Total length of each tunnel is 3.8 mi, excavated with two (2) EPB-TBMs with a 30 ft. dia.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Elbe-Link Highway Tunnel, Germany PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Design work for a tunnel crossing under Elbe River in course of the extension of the Highway 20 Western ring around the City of Hamburg. Feasibility study for different solutions including High Level Bridge, Submersed Tunnel and Bored Tunnel. Technical documentation for e. planning approval under consideration of different alignment variations. Execution of the pre-design (~ 60 %) for all structures including cross passages, ramps and trenches for two parallel 3.8 mi long and 45 ft. wide bored tunnels plus 21 cross passages in conventional manner. Glacial influenced geology, mainly containing sands, marl, silt and clay. Ground layers with embedded stones and boulders. Ground water with high contents of salt and ammonium changing due to tidal influence. Philipp worked together with the other design JV team members, specifically on the part of elaboration of the vertical and horizontal alignment, stability and buoyancy calculations for the segment design, settlement monitoring and mitigation procedures for the crossing of sensitive structures, site allocation and material transport. He coordinated the design work for the BabendererdeEngineers team.

4 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 3 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Inntal Railway Tunnels H3-4 and H8, Austria PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2006-2009 2006-2009 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE x NUMBER Co. PORR Tunnelbau Mr. Hans Köhler +43 50 626 1572 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Construction of the Northern approach tunnels to the Brenner Alp Crossing for high speed railway. More than 50% of the main tunnel along the valley is excavated by soft ground TBMs. As well the 21 escape tunnels are constructed by a soft ground TBM. Three JV’s are working on the TBM section. Lot H3-4 is about 5 miles long with an excavation diameter of 40 foot. The same dimension is excavated with another TBM at Lot H8 for a length of another 2 miles. The retractable escape tunnel pipe-jacking TBM has a diameter of 15 foot. This contractor works as sub- contractor to both main tunnel JVs. BE performed geotechnical construction management services at the side of the Contractor (special requirement by the main contract). This work enclosed geological mapping, monitoring of the tunneling operations and control of the settlement measurements and elaboration of technical statements for the Contractor. This included monitoring of the start shaft with an excavations diameter of about 105 ft. and about 80 ft. deep. The CM service included as well participation during compressed air intervention to the front of the TBM to execute cutterhead maintenance

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. PORR Tunnelbau Jenbach, Austria Member of Contractor JV

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE b. Babendererde Engineers Bad Schwartau, Germany Sub to the Contractor JV

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE c.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE d.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE e.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE f.

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3

2 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Herrentunnel, Luebeck, Germany PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)

23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Luebeck, Road Department, Germany Dr. Stefan Klotz +49 451 122 6600 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Construction of a highway tunnel under the river “Trave” as replacement for an old bascule bridge. Alignment between the existing road junctions with 6% grades. Two parallel tunnels, each with an outer diameter of 38 ft. and a length of 0.5 mi each, combined with two cross passages excavated under the protection of ground freezing.

Role as an expert engineer within the concession givers engineering team with responsibility for the TBM operations and tunnel lining quality. Claim checking under consideration of the special responsibility distribution within a PPP concession.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE b.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE c.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE d.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE e.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE f.

3 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Túnel Gastau, Brazil PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Since 2009 Since 2009 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Petrobras S.A. Mr. Fabiano Cardoso +55 12 3883 1555 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Construction of a dead-end tunnel for a gas pipeline at the Brazilian Coast. The tunnel is excavated with a Hard-Rock Double Shield TBM with segmental lining behind the TBM. The excavation diameter is 21 ft. The total length is 3.4 mi with 1,200 ft. of conventional excavation starter tunnel. The tunnel has an inclination of 3% upwards. Ground conditions are granite and gneiss with occasional faulting. Water with a max head of approx. 600 PSI might be present closer to the end of the tunnel drive. The contractor and the BM team use different methods for geotechnical exploration ahead of the TBM, like BEAM (geophysical system) or STP (seismic refraction system). BE is responsible within the BM team for the monitoring of the TBM operations and all related technical issues. This includes tunnel lining quality and geotechnical classification by inspection of the tunnel face. The CM team is supported by the software TPC, which is as well supplied by BE.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Shaft Engenharia Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Member of CM JV

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE b. Babendererde Engineers Bad Schwartau, Germany Member of CM JV

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE c.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE d.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE e.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE f.

4 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Tunnel, Bothell, WA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Since 2004 Since 2006 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER King County Mr. Gunars K. Sreibers 206-684-2113 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Construction of a sewer and treated water mains (influent and effluent) between a new treatment plant in Bothell and the Puget Sound in Shoreline, WA The connection tunnel has a combined length of 10 mi with a diameter ranging between 14.1 ft. and 18 ft. partly with installed carrier pipes. Glacial influenced ground conditions, existing mainly of sands, clays and gravel. The ground conditions are highly abrasive. Ground overburden up to 270 ft. with a water head of max. 100 PSI. The tunnel construction works are divided into three lots involving four TBMS. The side contracts are excavated by 2 EBP-TBMs, while the central contract employs 2 Slurry-TBMs.

BE was a member of the design team, responsible for the TBM and tunneling specifications. Further input regarding the segment design and the vertical alignment. During the construction phase BE assists the client for specific reviews and during claims. As well, BE supplied to the client specific software (TPC – Tunneling Process Control) to monitor the TBM operations.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. MWH Seattle, WA Member of the Design JV

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE b. Jacobs & Associates Seattle, WA Member of the Design JV

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE c. Babendererde Engineers Vancouver, WA Sub to the Design JV

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE d.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE e.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE f.

5 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Beacon Hill, Light Railway Extension, Seattle, WA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2005-2009 2004-2008 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Sound Transit Mr. Joseph P. Gildner 206-689-3350 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

The City of Seattle and King County decided to build a light railway connection between the city center and the international airport in South King County. This project will facilitate access for travellers to and from the City of Seattle. The Southern suburbs shall take advantage of the light railway to improve commuting. Within the railway alignment a tunnel needed to be built under Beacon Hill, a suburb on top of a small elevated range. The twin tunnels have a length of about one mile each with an outer diameter of 21 feet, consisting of precast reinforced concrete. An underground station was constructed in the middle by conventional means to give direct access to the light railway from the top of the elevation. The TBM started on the western slope right between pillars of the Interstate 5 highway in direction for the underground station, where it had been pushed through to continue its drive to the eastern slope. The TBM was disassembled, transported back to the western side and restarted for the second tunnel. The geology consisted of glacial influenced sands, silts and clays with some inter-bedded cobbles. The tunnel alignment was above the ground water level; still the EPB-TBM had to be operated in closed mode to stabilize the tunnel face and to reduce the settlements. BE’s role was construction management services for the technical TBM operation. It consisted of regular inspections on the job site and reviews of TBM data.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Parson Brinckerhoff Seattle, WA CM Prime

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE b. Babendererde Engineers Vancouver, WA Sub to CM Prime

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE c.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE d.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE e.

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE f.

6 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS (Fill in "Example Projects Key" section below before completing PERSONNEL CONTRACT table. Place "X" under project key number for (From Section E, (From Section E, participation in same or similar role.) Block 12) Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Lars Babendererde Designer type X X

Philipp Elsner Designer type X X X

Christian Hahn Designer type X X

29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) 1 Inntal Railway Tunnels, H3-4 & H8, Austria 6

2 Herrentunnel, Luebeck, Germany 7

3 Túnel Gastau, Brazil 8

4 Brightwater Conveyance Tunnel, Bothell, WA 9

5 Beacon Hill, Light Railway Extension, Seattle, 10 WA STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 4

Lars Babendererde has electronically signed Section H, but not included any information. It is available upon request.

7 ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS

PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION

1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER December 8, 2010 n/a B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT

4. NAME AND TITLE Robert A. Everett, PE – Managing Principal 5. NAME OF FIRM Everett Engineers, LLC 6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 978-378-4686 978-378-4686 [email protected] C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check)

9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT J-V PRIME SUBCON- PARTNER TRACTOR

Everett Engineers, LLC 44 State Street Tunnel Systems Integration and Start- a. X Middleport, NY 14105 up Planning

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE

63 Main Street, Suite 6 Tunnel Systems Integration and Start- Everett Engineers, LLC b. X Bridgewater, MA 02324 up Planning

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f.

 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE

D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM  (Attached)

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 1 MANDATORY USE DATE OF FORM 6/2004 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.)

12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Howard D. Sawyer Tunnel Systems Integrator, Oversight/ a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM Inspection 29 4.2 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Everett Engineers, Middleport, NY 16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) BS Business Management 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project, Influent Pump Station (IPS), Bothell, WA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2006-Present 2008-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Provide Resident Engineer services at the 130MGD pump station for the Brightwater Project owned by King County. Role includes managing a staff of 15 professionals including an Office Engineer, Chief Inspector, Inspectors, and Admin personnel. Oversee Contractor activities and monitor progress to ensure all work is perform in accordance with the Contract and approved design. Review submittals, Requests for a. Information (RFIs), correspondence, and Daily Inspection Reports (DIRs). Ensure all administrative processes are followed and Project documentation is properly stored. Initiate Nonconformance Reports (NCRs), correspondence, reports, and support the Owner as necessary. Chair various meetings including weekly Progress Meetings and schedule meetings. All processes are managed using the Intellect Project Management software program. IPS was the pilot project for implementation of this management program. Led the efforts in development of the Contractor’s testing and commissioning program. Developed the first test procedure’s format and level of required detail to be used as the template for all test procedures. Scoped all Project systems by defining system boundaries such that system test procedures could be developed allowing for complete and safe testing. Coordinating training of Owner personnel, receipt of spare parts and other commissioning activities. Interface with local and state authorities to ensure all required codes and standards are met during construction to ensure a smooth transition to operational status at the end of the Project. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Upgrade & Restart – Athens, AL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2003 - 2006 N/A  b. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Startup and Systems Engineer with Bechtel Power at the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant n Athens, AL for the upgrade and restart of Unit 1 which was shut down for over twenty years. Responsibilities included preparing testing, operational, and, maintenance procedures for assigned systems. Systems included mechanical, electrical, and controls systems.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED University of Connecticut Campus-wide Improvement, Storrs, CT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2002-2003 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm c. Oversaw Contactor activities ($1 billion campus upgrade project). Acted as Owner Representative during planning, scheduling, and other meetings as well as in the field. Reviewed submittals, contract bids, contract change requests, pay requisitions, etc. and advised Owner. Processed/filed all contract documentation. Supervised Contractor field activities ensuring installation meets design, quality, and code requirements.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Central Artery Project, Boston, MA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 1995 - 2003 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Developed Test Department programs and procedures. Reviewed Project design specifications and contract design submittals. Reviewed and d. approved Contractor testing submittals. Coordinated construction and commissioning activities between Project, Construction, Contractor, and Outside Agency personnel. Supervised Contractor testing activities. Reviewed RFIs, drawings, and submittals. Provided technical input to the Owner’s Operations and Maintenance Depts. Verified system design conformance. Reviewed training submittals. Coordinated and conducted training. Developed System Operating Procedures. Developed System Turnover Packages and oversaw the T/O process. Oversaw the development of Operations and Maintenance Manuals. Provided input to the Construction Cost Analysis/Savings Program. Coordinated Project drainage systems. Conducted project-wide and tunnel SCADA testing. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)

(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm e.

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.)

12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Robert A. Everett, PE, LEED AP On-call Expertise: Tunnel Systems a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 21 6 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Middleport, NY 16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) BS Mechanical Engineering NY, MA, WA, CA – Mechanical Engineering MBA Management 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers National Fire Protection Association LEED Accredited Professional Society of Petroleum Engineers Society of American Military Engineers NAVFAC Construction Quality Control Management Course (2010) 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Expert Witness - New York City, NY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2010 N/A  a. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Performing expert witness professional engineering with respect to NYC transit tunnel infrastructure and systems evaluations in support of resolving conflicts between proposed tunnel support structures and local residential structures. Specifically evaluated how tunnel structures and the systems contained within could be revised, relocated or repositioned to accommodate an abutting residential setback.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED LBJ Mobility Project - Dallas, TX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2005 - 2009 2016 (Est.) (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Tunnel Systems Task Manager for the development of the Conceptual Design and Procurement Engineering Team for the LBJ Mobility Project b. as a subconsultant to Carter-Burgess (now Jacobs Engineering). Our team developed design criteria and procurements for the successful bid and award of this Design-Build-Operate-Maintain-Finance project. We also provided cost estimating for the construction, operation and maintenance to establish cost inputs to the overall project cost. The systems included two new independent high voltage electrical services for the project, 5 miles of tunnels, tunnel ventilation system and controls, drainage, fire protection, lighting, control and monitoring systems, and provided input for intelligent highway systems, coordination with emergency response agencies and other design firms. Total project estimated cost is $1.4B. Tunnel Systems estimated construction cost: $110M. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Port of Miami Tunnel - Miami, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2006 Ongoing (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm c. Everett Engineers performed the independent cost estimate validation for the Port of Miami Tunnel as a subconsultant to URS, Inc. The estimate included all tunnel systems including tunnel ventilation, drainage, fire protection, flood gates, power distribution, lighting, intelligent highway systems, and tunnel support facilities such as the operation control center building and maintenance facility. The costs estimate included construction costs, operating and maintenance costs that would be used to determine the overall total project cost. The estimated project cost $1.1B. Tunnel Systems estimated construction cost: $90M. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Ted Williams Tunnel - Boston, MA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES N/A 2007 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm d. Everett Engineers performed an evaluation and design of a replacement HVAC control system that integrated 6 tunnel support buildings for the Ted Williams Tunnel in Boston, MA. The buildings included the Operations Control Center, Tunnel Ventilation Buildings, and the highway Maintenance Facility, and State Police Headquarters Building. The new state-of-the-art system included over 10,000 input/output points and 25 control panels. The estimated construction cost was $1M+.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Private Tunnel - NC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2007 2008 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm e. Everett Engineers performed an code evaluation and design of a 300-foot tunnel to accommodate a private housing development. Applicable federal and state codes were reviewed to determine what tunnels systems were required for this relatively short tunnel. Once determined, appropriate design documents were issued to permit design of the tunnel systems. The estimated construction cost was $1M.

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 2

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 1 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED New York City, NY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2010 N/A 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Zarin & Steinmetz Brad K. Schwartz, Esq. (914) 682-7800 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

A clearance issue occurred during a construction project involving a transit facility and private building in New York City. Everett Engineers is tasked with evaluating the structure layout and equipment/systems configuration within the transit facility. This scope of this evaluation consisted of typical transit system components such as tunnel ventilation fans, electrical switchgear, communications equipment, tunnel egress, etc. The purpose was to determine is alternate building layouts, equipment configuration changes or relocation of equipment could be performed to resolve the clearance issue.

Everett Engineers successfully completed a deposition / affidavit with Zarin & Steinmetz, the client’s attorney, that has been submitted to the court for decision making purposes.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Everett Engineers, LLC Middleport, NY Tunnel Systems Consultant

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 3 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance Project – Bothell, WA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2006-Present 2007-Present 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION

a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER King County Washington 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) The $105M Brightwater IPS Project consists of an eighty foot deep binocular shaft, five floor (eleven stories in height) pump station building housing two series 45MGD/1500HP centrifugal raw sewage pumps, two series 24MGD/750HP centrifugal raw sewage pumps (eight total raw sewage pumps), variable frequency drives, 4kV switchgear, motor control centers (MCCs), programmable logic controllers (PLCs - total of eight), and various ancillary and support systems and equipment. A generator building houses three 2.8MW backup diesel generators, paralleling switchgear, MCC’s, day tanks, and associated support systems and equipment. The normal source of power was installed by Puget Sound Energy includes a switchgear facility which provides primary power to the site. Part of the Influent Structure consists of a 74 foot deep and 74 foot in diameter shaft where all raw sewage and treated water enters and exits the tunnels and piping from the treatment Plant in Woodinville to the Outfall in Shoreline 14 miles to the west. All flows go through the IPS on the way to and from the Treatment Plant.

The IPS is the hub for the Brightwater Project and treats all raw sewage for northern King County and Snohomish County. Once treated, the clean water will be discharged into Puget Sound. While the IPS is under construction, King County chose to upgrade many existing facilities (pump stations and odor control). The IPS Project managed the PLC programming and all Commissioning for each of the seven Ancillary Projects. Everett Engineers is serving the above described King County IPS Project by providing Resident Engineer (RE) services. The RE role includes managing a staff of 15 professionals including an Office Engineer, Chief Inspector, Inspectors, and Admin personnel. The RE also oversees Contractor activities and monitors Contractor progress and ensures all work is perform in accordance with the Contract and approved design. The RE also reviews submittals, Requests for Information (RFIs), correspondence, and Daily Inspection Reports (DIRs). He ensures all administrative processes are followed and Project documentation is properly stored He initiates Nonconformance Reports (NCRs), correspondence, reports; Chairs various meetings including weekly Progress Meetings and schedule meetings; and, Supports the Owner as necessary. All processes are managed using the Intellect Project Management software program. IPS was the pilot project for implementation of this management program.

The RE led the efforts in development of the Contractor’s testing and commissioning program. He developed the first test procedure’s format and level of required detail to be used as the template for all test procedures. As a basis for the test program, the RE scoped all Project systems by defining system boundaries such that system test procedures could be developed allowing for complete and safe testing. The RE is also coordinating training of Owner personnel, receipt of spare parts and other commissioning activities and interfacing with local and state authorities to ensure all required codes and standards are met during construction to ensure a smooth transition to operational status at the end of the Project. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Everett Engineers, LLC Bridgewater, MA Tunnel Systems Engineering and Cost Estimating F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 3 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED LBJ Mobility Project – Dallas, TX PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION (If SERVICES applicable) 2006 - Present N/A 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Texas Department of Transportation Randy Poucket (Carter-Burgess) (214) 236-8824 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

The IH-635 Managed Lanes Project consists of a combination of the reconstruction of main lanes to provide the General Purpose Lanes, the construction of Managed Lanes, construction of new and reconstruction of Frontage Roads, installation of necessary tolling infrastructure, the establishment of a Managed Lane tolling operation, and the maintenance and operation of an approximately 25 mile portion of the IH-635 and IH-35E corridors in Dallas County, Texas.

The goal of this project is to relieve severe congestion on 13 miles of Interstate Highway I-635 (LBJ) from just west of I-35E (near Luna Road) to just east of United States Highway (US) 75 (near Greenville Ave.), and south on I-35E from I-635 to Loop 12.

While working for Jacobs Civil, Inc. which was TxDOT’s Engineer, Robert Everett, PE served as the Tunnel Systems Conceptual Design Task Manager responsible for the development of the conceptual design (10% level) for the tunnel systems of 8+ miles of tunnel that were anticipated to be part of this project. These systems included tunnel ventilation, lighting, electrical supply and distribution, fire protection, drainage, tunnel system control and monitoring of equipment and systems, the operations control center and maintenance facilities. The team also provided design input to civil, structural, intelligent highways system, and other design disciplines. E also coordinated with numerous state and local stakeholders and emergency response personnel.

Everett Engineers then provided Procurement Engineering services to Jacobs as a subconsultant. The project is a Design- Build-Operate-Maintain-Finance for a 35-50 year term once completed. The team developed procurement documentation that included finalizing design criteria (technical provisions), construction, operating, and maintenance cost estimates (for the 35-50 year operating period), integrated commissioning (startup, operation, maintenance, documentation, and turnover) requirements into the procurement documents, provided input for grading contractor operating performance once the system in operation, and ensured that tunnel system requirements were consistent with project goals, federal, state and local standards and regulations.

The estimated construction cost of the entire project is $1.4B while the tunnel systems estimated cost is well in excess of $100M. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Everett Engineers, LLC Middleport, NY Tunnel Systems Task Manager, Lead Mechanical Engineer F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 4 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Port of Miami Tunnel, Miami FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2007 2010 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Florida Department of Transportation Hugh Miller (URS, Inc. Florida) (407) 264-3827 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) Everett Engineers was tasked by URS, Inc. and Florida Department of Transportation to perform an independent construction, maintenance and operating cost estimate to validate the Owner’s Engineer’s cost estimate for the proposed $1.2B Port of Miami Tunnel. The scope of the cost estimate included all tunnel mechanical, electrical, and control (SCADA) systems that are part of the tunnel. The project format was design-build- operate-maintain-finance. Because of this format, all costs associated with the tunnel for the next 35 years needed to be extrapolated and included to determine an annualized cost that could be used for competitively bidding the project.

The project had been designed to the 10% level to provide guidance to the “Contractor” to complete the design and build the facility. Everett Engineers took the preliminary design and, using our in-house expertise, advanced the design for each particular system so that an accurate cost could be determined. The tunnel systems included tunnel ventilation, drainage, fire protection, electrical distribution, tunnel and roadway lighting, Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, tunnel flood gates, intelligent highway systems (electronic signs, etc.), and the operating and maintenance facilities.

The cost information developed from this estimate was compiled in a comprehensive stand-alone document that was very useful to the project accountants to verify and validate the cost estimate developed by the Owner’s Representative/Engineer.

The final cost associated with constructing, operating and maintaining the facility’s tunnel systems was approximately $100M.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Everett Engineers, LLC Bridgewater, MA Tunnel Systems Engineering and Cost Estimating F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 5 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Ted Williams Tunnel Support Facilities - HVAC Upgrade, Boston, MA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2007 N/A 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Massachusetts Turnpike Authority Peter Cavicchi, PE (781) 431-5122 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) The Ted Williams Tunnel was placed into service in 1995 and the HVAC control systems had reached their end of service life, parts were being scavenged since obtaining parts for obsolete equipment is difficult and expensive. Everett Engineers was tasked to study, evaluate and design a new HVAC control system for 6 buildings including tunnel ventilation buildings, maintenance facility, police barracks/command center, and the Central Artery’s Operation Control Center. Each building had 4 to 6 interface panels with approximately 1200 project input/output monitoring and control points. The final design included an “open” architecture that was BACnet compatible such that all the buildings communicated with each other and could be controlled at one building or centrally at the Operations Control Center. In addition, the system will be compatible with future systems that will be installed in the remainder of the Central Artery/Tunnel Project.

The estimated construction cost was $950,000.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Everett Engineers, LLC Bridgewater, MA Mechanical Engineer F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 6 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. (Complete one Section F for each project.)

21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Attleboro Commuter Rail Station Renovation – Attleboro, MA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2008 N/A 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Greater Attleboro-Taunton Regional Transit Mitch Keamey, PE (TEC, Inc. for GATRA) (978) 794-1792 x123 Authority, Attleboro, MA 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) The Greater Attleboro-Taunton Regional Transit Authority decided to completely renovate the commuter rail station located in Attleboro, MA. Everett Engineers, as a subconsultant to TEC, Inc., was tasked to provide all mechanical, electrical, lighting and fire protections engineering services for this 3,500 sf facility.

The project included completely demolishing all the existing interior, including all mechanical and electrical systems. Our design included a new electrical service to the station as well as electrical distribution within the facility, new heating and air conditioning systems including a heat pump systems, new interior and exterior lighting including code compliant control system, a new fire alarm system for the station as well as a concession area, and new restroom facilities.

The construction cost was $900,000.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT

1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Everett Engineers, LLC Bridgewater, MA Electrical, Lighting & Fire Protection Engineer 1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE b. Everett Engineers, LLC Middleport, NY Project Manager, Mechanical, Fire Protection & Plumbing Engineer G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS (Fill in "Example Projects Key" section below before completing PERSONNEL CONTRACT table. Place "X" under project key number for (From Section E, (From Section E, participation in same or similar role.) Block 12) Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Project Manager, Task Manager, X X X X X X Robert A. Everett, PE Mechanical Engineer Construction Manager X Howard D. Sawyer Resident Engineer

29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) 1 NYC Transit Expert Witness 6 Attleboro Commuter Train Station Renovation

2 Brightwater Conveyance Project 7

3 LBJ Mobility Project 8

4 Port of Miami Tunnel 9

5 Ted Williams Tunnel HVAC Controls 10

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 4 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.

I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE January 23, 2011

33. NAME AND TITLE Robert A. Everett, PE – Managing Principal STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) PAGE 5 ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS

PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) Alaskan Way Viaduct Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER

B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4. NAME AND TITLE Cos Roberts, P.E. - President 5. NAME OF FIRM Urban Technology Systems 6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 206-658-2990 206-658-2995 [email protected] C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) 11. ROLE IN THIS 9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS CONTRACT ON- PART TRAC PRIME Grouting Inspection, Urban Technology Systems 2601 4th Ave. Ste. 440 Seattle WA Environmental Compliance a. X 98121

 CHECK IF BRANCH

OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ! (Attached) AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004) MANDATORY USE DATE OF FORM 6/2004

1 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Cos Roberts, PE Environmental Compliance a. TOTAL b. WITH 20 CURRENT FIRM 4 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Urban Technology Systems, Seattle, WA

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION B.S. Civil Engineering (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Professional Engineer: WA, OR 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Cos Roberts has over 20 years of Civil Engineering Experience covering many phases of design, construction, rehabilitation and project management related work. Progressive work history with project values ranging from $100K to $2.1B. Experienced in Management Plan Development, Assessment and Feasibility Studies, Design Build Operations, Facilities Construction, Project Controls and Construction Site Erosion Control & Pollution Control. .

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED King County Brightwater Conveyance System, Woodinville, WA PROFESSION CONSTRUCTION AL SERVICES (If applicable) 2005-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm a. Performs the duties of Third Party Coordinator which includes permitting and easement management, environmental compliance inspections and coordination with multiple county, municipal and regulatory agencies. The project is the construction of approximately 13 miles of large diameter tunnels from the new Brightwater Treatment Plant to Puget Sound. The project includes the construction of a 130 MGD pump station, six reaches of micro-tunneling, facility upgrades for county distribution of reclaimed water and various odor control facility upgrades and new facilities.

2 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Sound Transit Rainier Valley Link Light Rail, Seattle, WA. PROFESSION CONSTRUCTION AL SERVICES (If applicable) 2004-2005 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm b. Performed project cost engineering services for the 4 miles light rail construction project as part of the construction management team. Determined contract entitlements as part of the Change Management process, issues management, Contractor invoice reviews, and prepared cost estimates. The project included retaining wall installations, underground storage tanks and contaminated soil issues, sanitary sewer, water and storm water utility replacements in a congested urban environment and power and communications undergrounding.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Seattle Public Utilities Tolt Water Treatment Plant, Seattle, WA. PROFESSION CONSTRUCTION AL SERVICES (If applicable) 1998-2000 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE !Check if project performed with current firm Performed construction On-Site Engineering services for the Design/Build/Operate of WTP. Mr. Roberts was involved in this green field Tolt River watershed project from site clearing to plant startup activities. The 2-year assignment required coordination with the design team, contractor and owner’s c. representatives on all plant design and construction issues; the daily oversight of the contractor’s concrete placement and quality control program; temporary erosion sediment control measures in a watershed environment; underground duct banks, electrical cable trays, large/small pipe systems installations; and extensive office engineering document management. The project also involved construction of a small wetland mitigation development, back wash solids retention basins, landfill development, and Native American artifact recovery. The project was the winner of several awards including the EPA Environmental Excellence Grand Award.

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

3 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Marvin Jensen Grouting Inspector a. TOTAL b. WITH 30 CURRENT FIRM 0 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Urban Technology Systems, Seattle, WA

16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Building Inspection, Wilrick Institute, Sacramento, (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) CA

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) Mr. Jensen has 30 Years of field experience as an Owner’s Representative QA/QC Inspector for the trades. He has worked on Civil, Industrial and Commercial Construction Projects with constructed cost valuing up to $2.5 billion. His Capital Project Development Experience includes Construction, Start-Up and Closeout for Airports, Roadways, Mines, Dams, Office Towers, Parking Structures, Municipal Facilities, Commercial and Industrial Buildings. Project scopes included Demolition, Abatement, Blasting, Drilling, Mining, Phased Construction, Multiple Contract Management and Management of Construction Activities in Operating Commercial Enterprises. Inspection of Contractor’s Work for Compliance with Contract Specifications & Drawings.

Mr. Jensen’s certifications include: ICC(ICBO), Reinforced Concrete I/II, Structural Steel & Welding, Structural Masonry, Blueprint Reading, Radiation Safety & Nuclear Gauge Operation, ACI Concrete Strength Testing Technician, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician-Grade I, and Underground Mining.

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSION CONSTRUCTION Metropolitan Water District Inland Feeder Project, San AL SERVICES (If applicable) Bernardino, CA 2005-2010 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE !Check if project performed with current firm Principal Field Inspector of 7.9 miles of tunnel and 0.3 miles of cut-and-cover pipeline. Tunnel is 16-feet in a. width and holds a 12-foot-diameter steel pipeline. Elevation varies from 60 to 800 feet below surface. Tunnel Boring Machine is 220-foot-long, guided by a laser navigation system and has a 16-foot-diameter cutting face. The 250-ton unit is self-propelled and includes a trailing gear assembly, hydraulic rams and a muck conveyor system. An integrated push-pull locomotive and gantry car system disposes of nearly 25 tons of rock/advance. Also responsible for inspection of grouting of 25 foot average advance horizontal stabilization drill holes. Responsible for over-site of average contractor crew size of 12 to 15 persons per shift. Nine Daily Inspector’s Reports generated per shift via MS Word.

4 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Eastside Reservoir Project Metropolitan Water District Hemet, CA PROFESSION CONSTRUCTION AL SERVICES (If applicable) 1996-1999 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE !Check if project performed with current firm Supervised 12-member crew in drilling and grouting construction inspection of 250’ deep, 2 mile long two- line grout curtain and toe-to-toe consolidation drilling and grouting comprised of 14,472 consolidation holes and 3, 524 curtain holes as well as 59,325 L.F. of adits and galleries for the West Dam Grouting Programs. Scheduled 12-member crew to accommodate Contractor’s inspection requirements. Interpreted Design Intent through close study of specifications and ensured correct field application of b. same. Identified Engineering and Construction problems which required particular attention, giving Inspector’s and Contractor’s representatives specific insight as applicable. Wrote and administered Performance Evaluations. 12-hour shifts, six days per week, alternating day and night shifts for duration of 24 month contract. Responsible for all job site operations for entire $1.2 Billion project from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. while on night shifts.

Prior to commencement of East and West Dam Contracts, inspected construction of a 5-mile, 4-lane HIGHWAY including relocation of existing gas, electrical, water, lighting and sewage lines. Monitored placement of utility lines to ensure proper water and/or air tightness, bedding, grade location and bearing. Inspected piping system validation tests, such as Pressure & Inside Diameter checks and Hydraulic Pressure Tests. Tracked cap course, leveling courses, asphalt temperature, tons-placed-to-date/hour and equipment/manpower usage. Inspected profileography of joint transitions of road/bridge, placement of curbs and gutters and ensured lines and grades surveys were observed. Worked with County and City Inspectors to ensure code requirements were met.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Port of Seattle SeaTac Airport South Terminal Expansion and 5- PROFESSION CONSTRUCTION Story-Office Tower AL SERVICES (If applicable) 2000-2004 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE !Check if project performed with current firm Conveyance Systems Inspector Principal Field Inspector for Baggage Handling System as well as all other Division 14 Conveyance Systems, including Elevators, Escalators, Moving Sidewalks and Vertical Wheelchair Lifts. Civil Inspector c. Principal Field Inspector for Civil Construction, encompassing Underground Utilities, Earthwork and Excavation, Electrical Ductbank Construction, Disposal of Contaminated Soils, all Reinforced Concrete work, Concrete Foundations, Walls & Floor Slabs, Concrete Block Masonry, Decorative Stonework and Landscaping, Parking Lots & Roadways. Duties also included covering specialty inspectors for structural steel erection, metal decking, HVAC work, electrical installations, metal studs & drywall (including wall closure inspections and fire-safing), carpentry work, and finishes (painting, casework, wood paneling, carpeting, etc). Served as Primary Asbestos Abatement Inspector during demolition of existing Concourse and Hangar structures. Provided General Inspection Services of Mechanical, Electrical, Baggage Handling, Civil and Abatement while serving as Night Duty Inspector for the five-month Demo and Abate Project. Generated Inspectors Daily Reports via Expedition Construction Management Software.

5 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT PROJECT KEY (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not NUMBER specified. 1 (Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Brightwater Conveyance System, Woodinville, WA PROFESSIONA CONSTRUCTIO L SERVICES N (If applicable) 2005-Present 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT King County Judy Cochran/John Chritchfield TELEPHONE NUMBER 206 296-1739 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

King County is constructing a new regional wastewater treatment plant and deep-bore tunnel for conveyance from the new treatment plant to the Puget Sound out fall. The conveyance project has included upgrades to the existing facility and the coordination of three tunneling contractors.

The project is the construction of approximately 13 miles of large diameter tunnels from the new Brightwater Treatment Plant to Puget Sound. The project included the construction of a 130 MGD pump station, six reaches of micro-tunneling, facility upgrades for county distribution of reclaimed water and various odor control facility upgrades and new facilities.

UrbanTech performs the duties of Third Party Coordinator which includes permitting and easement management, environmental compliance inspections and coordination with multiple county, municipal and regulatory agencies. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT 1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) ROLE a. Urban Technology Systems Seattle, WA Third Party Coordinator

STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

6 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT PROJECT KEY (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not NUMBER specified. 2 (Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Tolt Water Treatment Facilities PROFESSIONA CONSTRUCTIO L SERVICES N (If applicable) 1998-2000 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT Seattle Public Utilities Fred Aigbe TELEPHONE NUMBER 206-386-0091 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

The Tolt River provides drinking water for one-third of the greater Seattle region. SPU recently constructed their first water treatment plant on the Tolt River to assure its year-round water supply capabilities from this source. The new treatment facilities included connecting a new 78-in conveyance system to the existing conveyance piping to move the supply waters through the plant treatment processes on its way to the end- users. One of the challenges of the plant construction was to keep the supply conveyance system in service for the full construction period. UrbanTech provided resident engineering service during the two-year construction period and assured proper installation of the new conveyance piping and worked with SPU, the design team, the contractor and other stakeholders to coordinate crucial intertie operations to the existing supply piping.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT 1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) a. RCT Engineers ( later Urban Seattle, WA On-site Construction

7 Technology Systems) engineer

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT PROJECT KEY (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not NUMBER specified. 3 (Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED Sound Transit Link Light Rail, Martin Luther King Jr. Segment PROFESSIONA CONSTRUCTIO L SERVICES N (If applicable) 2004-2005 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT Sound Transit Jared Moore TELEPHONE NUMBER (303) 820-5240 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Sound Transit is the regional transportation authority for the Snohomish, King and Pierce Counties of Western Washington. Sound Transit is current under construction with multiple contracts to construct a regional light rail system. The Rainier Valley segment of the Link Light Rail system is an at-grade segment of the system that links the Beacon Hill tunnel portion with the elevated segments that makes its way to Tukwila and ultimately the Seat- Tac Airport segment of the system. The initial Link Light Rail system stretches for 14 miles from downtown Seattle to Tukwila, Washington. Early on, the Rainier Valley segment was identified as one of the most difficult segments of the system to build. The segment is one of the only reaches that is at grade and is positioned along one of the city’s major traffic corridors. This segment has enhanced the quality of the surrounding neighborhoods which is historically known to be the most ethnically diverse area and home of a large portion of the city’s immigrant population. UrbanTech’s responsibilities included project cost engineering for change management, document management and administrative assistance to control contractor correspondence, interface with Sound Transit’s Live Link document control system, and Expedition document management. UrbanTech was part of the construction management team managing the 4.5 miles segment that involved extensive utility relocation, contaminated soil removal, track and station construction along Martin Luther King Jr. Way. UrbanTech staff members worked on the project from April 2004 until 2008 project close out. Our firm worked closely with the construction management team, Sound Transit representatives and representatives of various city of Seattle utility agencies. Our construction administration staff performed daily interface with the Contractor. Due to the challenges of the contract there were extensive document control requirements and cost control review.

8 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT 1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) Claims Control, Document Control, a. Urban Technology Systems Seattle, WA Administrative

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT PROJECT KEY (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not NUMBER specified. 5 (Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONA CONSTRUCTIO Seattle-Tacoma (SeaTac) International Airport Program L SERVICES N (If applicable) Management, Seattle Washington 1998-2008

23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT Port of Seattle Gary Ostle TELEPHONE NUMBER 206-433-5388 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost)

Seattle-Tacoma (SeaTac) International Airport Program Management, Seattle Washington The Port has developed plans for the modernization and expansion of Sea-Tac International Airport. Currently defined projects encompass the design and construction of over 120 capital improvement projects valued at approximately $2.4 billion over the next 10 years. The types of projects will vary widely, but include those related to the airfield, terminal buildings, ground transportation, infrastructure and special systems, and aviation support facilities to support the long range needs of the region. Urban Tech Systems as part of the SeaTac Program Management team since 1999 has been involved in varying capacities in each of these program areas, ranging from administrative support, estimating and schedule to systems inspections and resident engineering. The larger projects included: South Terminal Expansion Project (STEP): Facility encompasses 14 new gates with over 650,000 sq ft of concourse and 150,000 sq ft of administrative space. Overall project cost $600 Million (8 years). Systems involved included Fire Alarm and Monitoring System, PWDS (Backbone and Horizontal cabling), facility wide cable tray system connecting 20 equipment rooms, full facility Broadband LAN (TV) distribution system, Concourse wide Voice Paging System tied to the existing airport paging system, CCTV system to monitor Baggage Handling System(BHS) for maintenance and security, Security Door Hardware design and installation, and Conference Center Audio/Visual System with network and wireless remote control capability. Most communications cabling traveled through under-building utility tunnels between the facility's communications rooms located at ground level.

9 Communications Systems Implementations (CSI): This project provided a telecommunications, electrical and limited structural infrastructure for the implementation of systems that support airport and airline operations at a net worth of $6 Million. The objective of this project included: furnish and install electrical pathways and wiring, communications pathways, fiber optic cable, unshielded twisted pair (UTP) copper cabling, and shielded twisted pair (STP) copper cabling. The pathway and wiring serves the following projects: Flight Information Display Systems FIDS, Common Use Systems, Terminal-wide Voice Paging System (TWVPS), and Operations Local Area Network (Operations LAN). Some of URBANTECH’s staff responsibilities included:  Coordinate construction with other projects to ensure work flow  Conduct daily inspections of contractor work to ensure proper installations  Create contractor’s daily progress reports  Coordinate utility shutdowns to ensure minimal impact on airport operations

 Ensure safety meetings are conducted on a weekly bases  Coordinate contractor access to work areas to ensure construction progress  Research and investigate request for information (RFI) reports from contractors  Ensure contractor compliance with project specification manuals, layout drawings, and authorities having jurisdiction’s (AHJ) codes  Review submittals to ensure compliance with contract specifications  Conduct weekly contractor progress reports for contractor’s request for payment approval  Conduct weekly inspections of contractors red-line drawings  Review contractor’s shop drawings to ensure compliance with project specifications and AHJ codes  Inspect as-builds to ensure accuracy of final installations  Conduct commissioning of special systems implementations.

Security Systems

Access Control Systems Upgrade (ACSU): As part of SeaTac’s CIP the objective of this project was to upgrade the existing security systems. The project upgrade included replacement of the existing access control system (ACS) headend, field panels, electromagnetic locks, and card readers; installation of new security devices at existing and newly constructed portals; installation of new cross-point matrix analog closed-circuit television (CCTV) system, including the installation of new high-speed dome integrated pan/tilt/zoom cameras; installation of a new centralized digital video recording system (DVRS); installation of a new distributed-base Intercom system, including the replacement of the existing intercoms; replacement of the existing broadband local area network (LAN) with a new gigabit Ethernet LAN system; and removal of the existing broadband coaxial cable system after all systems cutover work by the systems contractor is complete at a cost of $32 million.

25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT 1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 3) Resident Engineer, Inspector, Scheduling, a. Urban Technology Systems Seattle, WA estimator, Document Controls, Administrative 10 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F (Fill in "Example Projects Key" section 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS below before completing table. Place "X" PERSONNEL CONTRACT under project key number for (From Section E, (From Section E, participation in same or similar role.) Block 12) Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Third Party X X X Cos Roberts, PE Coordinator/Environmental Marvin Jensen Grouting Inspector X X

29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT (FROM SECTION F) SECTION F) Brightwater Conveyance System, 1 Woodinville, WA 3 Sound Transit Link Light Rail, Martin Luther King Jr. Segment

Tolt Water Treatment Facilities Seattle-Tacoma (SeaTac) International 2 4 Airport Program Management, Seattle Washington STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

11 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.

UrbanTech Systems is a diverse disciplinary, Consulting Engineering and Construction Management Company. Our main focuses lie in civil engineering, Mechanical Engineering, communications/electrical engineering and special/security infrastructure systems. Our staff brings over 175 years together of industry experience that includes working for private companies/firms, community based businesses, the federal government and the military. We pride ourselves on building client, and community relationships, that will benefit the people, the area, and the client.

We have built our ten year servicing history by establishing client-trust and relationships, with agencies and prime contractors throughout the Northwest. We achieve this though providing reliable high-quality services to clients. We can work with you to make your project a success.

UrbanTech Systems is a family-centered firm. We work together as we would with you, contemplating over ideas, deciding on designs, and more or less working with you to make a better community. We serve our community through support of fellow small businesses and staff involvement in civic organizations like Tabor 100 and African American Prosperity Partnership. Our ten year history working with and for local organizations is an asset to our clients and the communities they serve.

Our Construction Management Services Include: Our Construction Management Projects: o ResidentEngineering o ThirdPartyCoordination o Brightwater Conveyance System Construction Program, WA o SmallProjectsManagement o SeaTac Airport Renovation Program, WA o ConstructionAdministration o Tolt Water Treatment Facilities, WA o DocumentControls o SoundTransit Link Light Rail System, WA o InspectionService o EstimatingServices

UrbanTech Systems is proud to be a Disabled Veteran-owned, Minority-owned Business Enterprise (MBE) and Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) that is certified in Washington (D3M8019973) and Oregon (4780).

A signed Section H is available upon request.

I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE 1/23/11

33. NAME AND TITLE Cos Roberts, President STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

12 SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Washington Licenses SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Washington Licenses SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SubmittalWashington Information Licenses Forms SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SubmittalWashington Information Licenses Forms SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SubmittalWashington Information Licenses Forms SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SubmittalWashington Information Licenses Forms SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES SubmittalWashington Information Licenses Forms SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES PerformanceWashington Evaluations Licenses SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES PerformanceWashington Evaluations Licenses SR 99 BORED TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES PerformanceWashington Evaluations Licenses