DOCSLIB.ORG

A Hrc 37 16 E.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Hrc 37 16 E.Pdf United Nations A/HRC/37/16 General Assembly Distr.: General 3 January 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-seventh session 26 February–23 March 2018 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* Ukraine * The annex is being issued without formal editing, in the language of submission only. GE.17-23488(E) A/HRC/37/16 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its twenty-eighth session from 6 to 17 November 2017. The review of Ukraine was held at the 15th meeting, on 15 November 2017. The delegation of Ukraine was headed by the Deputy Minister of Justice for European Integration, Sergiy Petukhov. At its 18th meeting, held on 17 November 2017, the Working Group adopted the report on Ukraine. 2. On 13 February 2017, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Ukraine: Georgia, Netherlands and Rwanda. 3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21, the following documents were issued for the review of Ukraine: (a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/28/UKR/1 and Corr. 1); (b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) (A/HRC/WG.6/28/UKR/2); (c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c) (A/HRC/WG.6/28/UKR/3). 4. A list of questions prepared in advance by Belgium, Brazil, Czechia, Germany, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America was transmitted to Ukraine through the troika. These questions are available on the extranet of the universal periodic review. I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process A. Presentation by the State under review 5. The delegation of Ukraine began by expressing its full support for the universal periodic review process. 6. Ukraine had adopted its first national human rights strategy in 2015, and a related action plan, for the period 2015–2020, following consultation with representatives of civil society. 7. Referring to General Assembly resolutions 68/262 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine and 71/205 on the situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine), the delegation highlighted that the main human rights challenge at the moment was the illegal annexation of Crimea and the occupation of parts of Donbas. It expressed the commitment of Ukraine to ensuring that United Nations and other international human rights mechanisms had a permanent presence in Crimea to fully monitor the human rights situation there. Ukraine would continue using all of the measures available to ensure that the Russian Federation complied with the temporary measures ordered by the International Court of Justice, in particular towards reinstating the Mejlis, a representative body of the indigenous Crimean Tatars, and ensuring the availability of education in Ukrainian. 8. The situation in Donbas remained fragile, and the conflict had already claimed more than 10,000 lives. Ukraine remained committed to the implementation of the ceasefire agreement and implementation package. The deployment of a full-fledged United Nations peacekeeping mission in the occupied territory of Donbas would be a real breakthrough in the process of peaceful settlement. The parliament was currently discussing a draft law on reintegration of the occupied parts of Donbas. 2 A/HRC/37/16 9. The current situation had led to the internal displacement of more than 1.5 million persons in the country, 88 per cent of whom had integrated into the receiving communities. The biggest obstacles to integration were the absence of housing, the absence of regular income and/or the lack of employment. The delegation stressed the efforts made by Ukraine to improve the allocation of social benefits to internally displaced persons, underlining that there was currently no mechanism available to provide such benefits in territories outside the control of the Government. 10. The issue of gender-based violence was being addressed through awareness-raising and information campaigns, the provision of assistance to the victims and the prosecution of offenders. Since October 2016, 26 mobile teams had provided social and psychological assistance to victims. The delegation underlined the findings of the human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine on widespread conflict-related sexual violence against civilians in areas controlled by armed groups in Donbas. Work towards the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (the Istanbul Convention) was ongoing. 11. In 2016, the Constitution had been amended to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, in particular through the elimination of political influence in the process of establishing courts and appointing judges. Twenty-seven regional free legal aid centres providing assistance in criminal cases, and 528 local centres providing secondary legal aid in administrative and civil cases, had been established in 2013 and 2015, respectively. Since 2015, the list of people entitled to free legal aid had been expanded to include internally displaced persons, victims of domestic violence, veterans and asylum seekers. 12. Article 124 of the Constitution had been amended to allow for the ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court within three years. Revision of domestic criminal law with a view to its harmonization with the Statute was under way. In April 2014, following declarations made by the parliament under article 12 (3) of the Statute, the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court had opened a preliminary investigation into the situation in Ukraine. 13. With regard to corruption, the delegation reaffirmed the commitment of Ukraine to establishing an anti-corruption court as a separate independent body. 14. Regarding the requirement for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to release financial declarations, the Government was working on establishing a system that would not endanger their activities and independence. 15. The penitentiary system in the Ukraine had been demilitarized. As a consequence of reforms the prison population had significantly decreased, which had led to the improvement of conditions in detention facilities. However, overcrowding and poor conditions of detention remained a problem in pretrial detention facilities. Articles 212 and 213 of the Criminal Procedure Code provided for due process safeguards for detainees, and an information technology system for custody records was currently being tested. 16. Ukraine remained committed to preventing torture and ill-treatment and prosecuting the perpetrators. In 2012, a national preventive mechanism had been established as part of the office of the ombudsperson. Furthermore, an independent State bureau of investigations had recently been set up to investigate crimes committed by high-ranking officials, judges, prosecutors and law enforcement officers. The Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment had conducted two visits to the country in 2016, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment had conducted four visits since 2012, and the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment would undertake a visit soon. 17. In 2014, anti-discrimination legislation in Ukraine had been updated to cover direct and indirect discrimination and aiding and abetting discrimination, to grant more powers to the ombudsperson in that area, to prohibit discrimination by private persons and companies and to introduce a mandatory anti-discrimination review of draft laws. In 2015, a national focal point for hate crimes had been established within the national police, and the 3 A/HRC/37/16 Government had continued to promote awareness-raising campaigns and encourage the reporting of hate crimes. 18. Draft law No. 1729 prohibiting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender “propaganda” had been withdrawn from the parliament, and the Labour Code had been amended in 2015 to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and occupation. In 2016, the Ministry of Health had abolished Order No. 60, which had required extensive psychiatric observation of transgender people before they underwent gender reassignment surgery. In 2016 and 2017, the Equality March had taken place peacefully in Kyiv under the protection of the national police. 19. The delegation stressed that Ukraine would continue to engage in inclusive dialogue with society to ensure that no group, including Roma, was marginalized or discriminated against. The national strategy on Roma integration had been implemented, extra efforts had been made to improve the documentation of the Roma population, and school attendance of Roma children had increased significantly. 20. Recent developments in gender equality included the approval of the national action plan to implement Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) on women, peace and security; the establishment of a commissioner
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nove Pravosuddya Justice Sector Reform Program (New Justice)
    NOVE PRAVOSUDDYA JUSTICE SECTOR REFORM PROGRAM (NEW JUSTICE) Quarterly Performance Report October – December 2019 Contract No.: AID-OAA-I-13-00032 Task Order No.: AID-121-TO-16-00003 Prepared for USAID/Ukraine C/O American Embassy 4 Igor Sikorsky St., Kyiv, Ukraine 04112 Prepared by Chemonics International Inc. 1717 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Table of Contents I. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 3 II. CONTEXT UPDATE 4 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 IV. KEY NARRATIVE ACHIEVEMENT 13 OBJECTIVE 1: JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND SELF GOVERNANCE STRENGTHENED 13 OBJECTIVE 2: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY OF THE JUDICIARY TO CITIZENS AND THE RULE OF LAW INCREASED 18 OBJECTIVE 3: ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE ENHANCED 20 OBJECTIVE 4: QUALITY OF LEGAL EDUCATION STRENGTHENED 23 OBJECTIVE 5: ACCESS TO JUSTICE EXPANDED AND HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTED 28 V. PROGRESS AGAINST TARGETS 33 VI. PERFORMANCE MONITORING, EVALUATION AND LEARNING 35 VII. LESSONS LEARNED 37 VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 38 IX. PROGRESS ON LINKS TO OTHER ACTIVITIES 39 X. PROGRESS ON LINKS TO HOST GOVERNMENT 40 XI. PROGRESS ON INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT 41 XII. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 42 XIII. GRANTS AND SUBCONTRACTS 43 XIV. ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATION 44 XV. ATTACHMENTS 46 A. List of Deliverables 46 B. Public Outreach Documents 48 C. Performance Data Table 49 D. Grants and Subcontracts Table 77 E. Future Activities Table 87 F. Milestones Progress Report 89 G. Counterparts and Beneficiaries Actively Involved in the Project 173 G. Success Story 209 2 I. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2019
    INSIDE: UWC leadership meets with Zelenskyy – page 3 Lomachenko adds WBC title to his collection – page 15 Ukrainian Independence Day celebrations – pages 16-17 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association, Inc., celebrating W its 125th anniversaryEEKLY Vol. LXXXVII No. 36 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2019 $2.00 Trump considers suspension of military aid Zelenskyy team takes charge to Ukraine, angering U.S. lawmakers as new Rada begins its work RFE/RL delay. Unless, of course, he’s yet again act- ing at the behest of his favorite Russian dic- U.S. President Donald Trump is consid- tator & good friend, Putin,” the Illinois sena- ering blocking $250 million in military aid tor tweeted. to Ukraine, Western media reported, rais- Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), a member of ing objections from lawmakers of both U.S. the House Foreign Affairs Committee, tweet- political parties. ed that “This is unacceptable. It was wrong Citing senior administration officials, when [President Barack] Obama failed to Politico and Reuters reported that Mr. stand up to [Russian President Vladimir] Trump had ordered a reassessment of the Putin in Ukraine, and it’s wrong now.” aid program that Kyiv uses to battle Russia- The administration officials said chances backed separatists in eastern Ukraine. are that the money will be allocated as The review is to “ensure the money is usual but that the determination will not be being used in the best interest of the United made until the review is completed and Mr. States,” Politico said on August 28, and Trump makes a final decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine (Draft Report Circulated on 24 November 2017 During the Ad-Referendum Period)
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/28/L.13 General Assembly Distr.: Limited 23 November 2017 Original: English UNEDITED VERSION Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Twenty-eighth session Geneva, 6-17 November 2017 Draft report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* Ukraine * The annex to the present report is circulated as received. GE. A/HRC/WG.6/28/L.13 Contents Page Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 I Summary of the proceedings of the review process ......................................................................... 3 A. Presentation by the State under review .................................................................................... 3 B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review ................................................. 5 II. Conclusions and/or recommendations .............................................................................................. 13 Annex Composition of the delegation ......................................................................................................... 26 2 A/HRC/WG.6/28/L.13 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its twenty-eighth session from 6 to 17 November 2017. The review of Ukraine was held at the 15th meeting on 15 November 2017. The delegation of Ukraine was headed by the Deputy Minister
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid Economic Resilience Activity: Quarterly
    USAID ECONOMIC RESILIENCE ACTIVITY: QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT October 01, 2019 – December 31, 2019 This publication was produced by the USAID Economic Resilience Activity under Contract No. 72012118C00004 at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. This document is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. Government. Quarterly Progress Report (Fiscal Year 2020 Quarter One) Program Title: USAID Economic Resilience Activity Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID Ukraine Contract Number: 72012118C00004 Contractor: DAI Global, LLC Submission Date: January 30, 2020 Author: DAI Global, LLC CONTENTS ACCRONIMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1 I. INTRODUCTION 3 BRIEF SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY 3 II. CONTEXT UPDATE 4 INCLUSION 5 INCREASING CAPABILITIES 5 INCREASING OPPORTUNITIES 6 GROWTH 7 MARKET EXPANSION 7 INVESTMENT ACCELERATION FOR MSMES 10 TRANSFORMATION 11 DRIVING VISION 11 SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT (ERA CONSTRUCTION) 12 III. PROGRESS AGAINST TARGETS 13 IV. PERFORMANCE MONITORING, EVALUATION AND LEARNING 14 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 14 AMELP REVISION 15 SPECIAL STUDIES 15 PAUSE AND REFLECT SESSIONS 16 V. LESSONS LEARNED 17 VI. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. CASH FLOW REPORT AND FINANCIAL PROJECTIONSERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. PROJECT FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS FOR USAID ECONOMIC RESILIENCE ACTIVITY FY 2020 Q1 ERROR!
    [Show full text]
  • Information As of 1 October 2019 Has Been Used in Preparation of This Directory
    Information as of 1 October 2019 has been used in preparation of this directory. PREFACE Key To Abbreviations Adm. Admiral Admin. Administrative, Administration Asst. Assistant Brig. Brigadier Capt. Captain Cdr. Commander Cdte. Comandante Chmn. Chairman, Chairwoman Col. Colonel Ctte. Committee Del. Delegate Dep. Deputy Dept. Department Dir. Director Div. Division Dr. Doctor Eng. Engineer Fd. Mar. Field Marshal Fed. Federal Gen. General Govt. Government Intl. International Lt. Lieutenant Maj. Major Mar. Marshal Mbr. Member Min. Minister, Ministry NDE No Diplomatic Exchange Org. Organization Pres. President Prof. Professor RAdm. Rear Admiral Ret. Retired Rev. Reverend RNTEST TEST RNTEST1 Test RNTEST12 Test Sec. Secretary TA Test Abbreviation VAdm. Vice Admiral VMar. Vice Marshal Afghanistan Last Updated: 24 Jun 2019 Pres. Ashraf GHANI CEO Abdullah ABDULLAH, Dr. First Vice Pres. Abdul Rashid DOSTAM Second Vice Pres. Sarwar DANESH First Deputy CEO Khyal Mohammad KHAN Min. of Agriculture, Irrigation, & Livestock Nasir Ahmad DURRANI Min. of Border & Tribal Affairs Gul Agha SHERZAI Min. of Commerce & Industry Ajmal AHMADY (Acting) Min. of Counternarcotics Salamat AZIMI Min. of Defense Asadullah KHALID (Acting) Min. of Economy Mohammad Mustafa MASTOOR Min. of Education Mohammad Mirwais BALKHI (Acting) Min. of Energy & Water Tahir SHARAN (Acting) Min. of Finance Mohammad Humayun QAYOUMI (Acting) Min. of Foreign Affairs Salahuddin RABBANI Min. of Hajj & Islamic Affairs Faiz Mohammad OSMANI Min. of Higher Education Abdul Tawab BALAKARZAI (Acting) Min. of Information & Culture Hasina SAFI (Acting) Min. of Interior Mohammad Masood ANDARABI (Acting) Min. of Justice Abdul Basir ANWAR Min. of Martyred, Disabled, Labor, & Social Affairs Sayed Anwar SADAT (Acting) Min. of Mines & Petroleum Nargis NEHAN (Acting) Min.
    [Show full text]
  • Nove Pravosuddya Justice Sector Reform Program (New Justice)
    NOVE PRAVOSUDDYA JUSTICE SECTOR REFORM PROGRAM (NEW JUSTICE) Annual Performance Report October 2018-September 2019 Contract No.: AID-OAA-I-13-00032 Task Order No.: AID-121-TO-16-00003 Prepared for USAID/Ukraine C/O American Embassy 4 Igor Sikorsky St., Kyiv, Ukraine 04112 Prepared by Chemonics International Inc. 1717 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Table of Contents I. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 2 II. CONTEXT UPDATE 4 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 IV. KEY NARRATIVE ACHIEVEMENT 16 V. PROGRESS AGAINST TARGETS 42 VI. PERFORMANCE MONITORING, EVALUATION AND LEARNING 44 VII. LESSONS LEARNED 48 VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 50 IX. PROGRESS ON LINKS TO OTHER ACTIVITIES 51 X. PROGRESS ON LINKS TO HOST GOVERNMENT 53 XI. PROGRESS ON INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT 54 XII. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 55 XIII. GRANTS AND SUBCONTRACTS 56 XIV. ACTIVITY ADMINISTRATION 57 XV. ATTACHMENTS 60 A. List of Deliverables 60 B. Public Outreach Documents 65 C. Performance Data Table 66 D. Grants and Subcontracts Table 96 E. Future Activities Table 114 F. Milestones Progress Report 118 G. Counterparts and Beneficiaries Actively Involved in the Project 189 H. Success Stories 223 1 I. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution ALCU Association of Legal Clinics of Ukraine APEOU Association of Private Enforcement Officers of Ukraine BPA Business Process Analysis CJC Community Justice Center CCU Constitutional Court of Ukraine CMI Court Management Institute CMU Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine COE Council of Europe COJ Council of Judges CRC Citizen Report Card CSO Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport De L'examen
    Nations Unies A/HRC/37/16 Assemblée générale Distr. générale 3 janvier 2018 Français Original : anglais Conseil des droits de l’homme Trente-septième session 26 février-23 mars 2018 Point 6 de l’ordre du jour Examen périodique universel Rapport du Groupe de travail sur l’Examen périodique universel* Ukraine * L’annexe n’a pas été revue par les services d’édition ; elle est distribuée dans la langue originale seulement. GE.17-23488 (F) 230118 240118 A/HRC/37/16 Introduction 1. Le Groupe de travail sur l’Examen périodique universel, créé conformément à la résolution 5/1 du Conseil des droits de l’homme, a tenu sa vingt-huitième session du 6 au 17 novembre 2017. L’Examen concernant l’Ukraine a eu lieu à la 15e séance, le 15 novembre 2017. La délégation ukrainienne était dirigée par le Vice-Ministre de la justice chargé de l’intégration européenne, Sergiy Petukhov. À sa 18e séance, tenue le 17 novembre 2017, le Groupe de travail a adopté le présent rapport concernant l’Ukraine. 2. Le 13 février 2017, afin de faciliter l’Examen concernant l’Ukraine, le Conseil des droits de l’homme avait constitué le groupe de rapporteurs (troïka) suivant : Géorgie, Pays-Bas et Rwanda. 3. Conformément au paragraphe 15 de l’annexe à la résolution 5/1 et au paragraphe 5 de l’annexe à la résolution 16/21, les documents ci-après avaient été établis en vue de l’Examen concernant l’Ukraine : a) Un rapport national présenté conformément au paragraphe 15 a) (A/HRC/WG.6/28/UKR/1 et Corr.1) ; b) Une compilation établie par le Haut-Commissariat aux droits de l’homme (HCDH) conformément au paragraphe 15 b) (A/HRC/WG.6/28/UKR/2) ; c) Un résumé établi par le HCDH conformément au paragraphe 15 c) (A/HRC/WG.6/28/UKR/3).
    [Show full text]
  • Naqa Annual Report: 2019
    NAQA ANNUAL REPORT: 2019 Kyiv 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM IN UKRAINE ............................................................................................. 3 1.1. Number of Higher Education Institutions................................................................................................ 3 1.2. Distribution by Form of Ownership, Region, Type ................................................................................ 9 1.3. National Higher Education Institutions (Quantity, Distribution by Region and Type) ..... 11 1.4. Applicants for Higher Education ............................................................................................................... 14 1.5. Academic Scholarships ................................................................................................................................... 22 1.6. Internationalisation of Higher Education ............................................................................................. 23 1.7. Ukrainian Students Abroad .......................................................................................................................... 31 1.8. Higher Education Expenditures ................................................................................................................. 32 1.9. Defense of Doctoral and PhD Theses ........................................................................................................ 44 1.10. Expenses on Research Activity.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Functional-Cognitive Category of Femininity in Modern Ukrainian
    COGNITIVE STUDIES | ÉTUDES COGNITIVES, 20 Warsaw 2020 Article No.: 2310 DOI: 10.11649/cs.2310 Citation: Kostusiak, N., Navalna, M., & Mezhov, O. (2020). The functional-cognitive category of femininity in modern Ukrainian. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 2020 (20), Article 2310. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs. 2310 NATALIIA KOSTUSIAK MARYNA NAVALNA Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda University, Lutsk, Ukraine State Pedagogical University, Pereiaslav, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9795-6038 Ukraine [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-3122 [email protected] OLEKSANDR MEZHOV Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, Lutsk, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5299-417X [email protected] THE FUNCTIONAL-COGNITIVE CATEGORY OF FEMININITY IN MODERN UKRAINIAN Abstract The article describes in detail the latest feminine nouns of professions, job titles, and other acti- vities. These nouns form part of the lexico-semantic system of Ukrainian and at the same time demonstrate its continuous dynamics. These neo-derivatives are actively used in modern Ukrainian media texts, contributing to the modernization and liberalization of the text, and to the creation of gender-linguistic balance. The need to involve feminitives in linguistic use is indicated by their codification in the new Ukrainian Orthography, although in previous editions they were ignored. These arguments and the focus on the idea of bilateral interpretation (semantics as dominant and formal), including in the context of anthropocentrism and active communication, form the basis for the development of the functional-cognitive category of femininity. Research into derivatology and semantic syntax make it possible to consider feminine personal nouns as elements with certain semantic-syntactic features, representing a profound and comprehensive aspect of the research.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine DAAD Ländersachstand
    Ukraine Kurze Einführung in das Hochschulsystem und die DAAD-Aktivitäten | 2020 DAAD Seite 2 I. Bildung und Wissenschaft Informationszentrum ⚫ Lektorate Die Ukraine ist Teil des Bolognaraums, das System und die Dozentenschaft sind allerdings post- sowjetisch geprägt. Unter Serhii Kvit (DAAD-Alumnus), dem ersten Bildungsminister nach der soge- nannten Revolution der Würde auf dem Maidan, wurde ein ehrgeiziges Hochschulreformprogramm begonnen: ein wichtiger Meilenstein ist das Hochschulreformgesetz vom 1. Juli 2014. Dessen Aus- richtung wurde mit den Änderungen zum Hochschulgesetz vom 18.12.2019 noch einmal verstärkt. In wie weit die im Folgenden skizzierten Änderungen realisiert werden können, ist angesichts der wirtschaftlichen Schwierigkeiten, die auf die Ukraine im Rahmen der Corona-Krise zukommen, frag- lich. Während der Amtszeit von Liliia Hrynevych von April 2016 bis Juli 2019 lag der Schwerpunkt stark auf dem Schulbereich. Dies änderte sich nach den Parlamentswahlen vom Sommer 2019, in der die Partei des amtierenden Präsidenten Volodymyr Selenkyi, Sluga narodu (Diener des Volkes), die absolute Mehrheit gewann. Zur Bildungsministerin wurde Hanna Novosad ernannt, die im Alter von 29 Jahren bereits über fünf Jahre Arbeitserfahrung im Bildungsministerium verfügte. Das Portfolio Hochschulen übernahm als Stellvertretender Minister Yegor Stadnyi, der eine sehr intensive Öffent- lichkeitsarbeit betrieb. Während Hanna Novosad Anfang März aus Protest gegen die einschneiden- den Kabinettsumbildungen ihr Amt niederlegte, blieb Yegor Stadnyi in seiner Position. Eine Ge- schäftsführende Ministerin wurde Ende Juni von Serhii Shkarlat, dem Rektor der Technologischen Universität Tscherniwzi, abgelöst. Die Besetzung ist zum Abschluss des Sachstandes extrem um- stritten, die Academic Community wirft ihm Plagiat, Korruption und mangelnde Reformbereitschaft vor. Da offensichtlich war, dass eine Zustimmung im Parlament nicht zu erreichen war, wurde er in einer geschlossenen Sitzung der Regierung ernannt und kann damit, wie seine Vorgängerin, auch nur geschäftsführend sein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Rights Situation in Ukraine
    Unofficial translation The Human Rights Situation in Ukraine Report of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Moscow 2020 2 Content: Manifestations of neo-Nazism, glorification of former Nazis and collaborationists, as well as the spread of racism, xenophobia, and anti-Semitism ...................................................................................... 4 Restrictions on media activities (censorship, pressure, harassment of journalists) ........................................................................................ 32 Persecution of national minorities ..................................................... 45 Discrimination of national minorities in the area of education and the use of their language ......................................................................... 52 Human rights violations by Ukrainian law enforcement bodies ........ 59 Discrimination against worshippers and ministers of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church .............................................................. 65 Violations of social and economic rights of the population in South- Eastern Ukraine................................................................................. 72 Human rights violations in the context of the spread of coronavirus infection ............................................................................................ 80 3 The human rights situation in Ukraine continues to degrade. The Kyiv authorities adopt legislative acts contrary to the rules of national law and international obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • REFORMS FORUM: on the ROAD to VILNIUS February 25, 2020
    REFORMS FORUM: ON THE ROAD TO VILNIUS February 25, 2020 09.00 - 09.30 Guests registration and welcome coffee 09.30 - 10.00 Welcome remarks Invited speakers: ● Oleksiy Honcharuk, Prime Minister of Ukraine ● Ričardas Degutis, Ambassador at Large, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania ● Larisa Galadza, Ambassador of Canada to Ukraine ● Matti Maasikas, EU Ambassador, Head of the EU Delegation to Ukraine ● Joseph Pennington, Acting Deputy Chief of Mission, U.S. Embassy in Ukraine ● Ihor Burakovsky, Co-Chairperson of the RPR Coalition Board, Chairperson of the Board at the Institute of Economic Research and Policy Consulting. 10.00 - 11.00 Main panel discussion. Synchronization of the Reforms Agenda: Government's Action Program, Parliament’s Plan, Civil Society Suggestions and Citizen’s Expectations - What are the lessons learned in the reforms implementation from the first half-year of the Parliament and the Government? - Citizens as the final beneficiaries: what are the criteria for reforms efficiency? - How to achieve inclusiveness and balance of interests in public policy-making? Invited speakers: ● Oleksiy Honcharuk, Prime Minister of Ukraine ● Dmytro Razumkov, Chairperson of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine ● Juliya Kyrychenko, Co-chairperson of the RPR Coalition Board, Member of the Board of the Centre of Policy and Legal Reforms, ● Ihor Burakovsky, Co-Chairperson of the RPR Coalition Board, Chairperson of the Board at the Institute of Economic Research and Policy Consulting ● Iryna Bekeshkina, Director of the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation Panel moderator: Andrii Kulykov, Chairperson of the Board and Presenter at Hromadske Radio 11.00 - 11.15 Coffee break Thematic Panel Discussions Panel Discussion #1.
    [Show full text]