DOCSLIB.ORG

Hktx Marking Scheme (Final).Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hktx Marking Scheme (Final).Pdf THE HONG KONG INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SECRETARIES THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SECRETARIES AND ADMINISTRATORS International Qualifying Scheme Examination HONG KONG TAXATION PILOT PAPER Marking Scheme 1 1 (a) Main points to be covered are: 1. Hong Kong is well known as a source jurisdiction. To be chargeable under Hong Kong income tax, the concept of residence is not relevant. Rather, the source of income is important. Subject to exemptions, in general a person, irrespective of whether he/she is a Hong Kong resident person or overseas resident person, is chargeable to: (a) Hong Kong property tax if he/she owns Hong Kong property which generates rental income (b) Hong Kong salaries tax if he/she is under Hong Kong employment or holds a Hong Kong office or is under foreign employment but renders services in Hong Kong (c) Hong Kong profits tax if he/she carries on a trade, profession or business in Hong Kong and derives Hong Kong sourced profits from such a trade, profession or business 2. In general, the concept of residence has no significant effect on tax exemption and deduction rules under Hong Kong income tax. Resident persons or non-resident persons are equally treated in terms of tax exemptions and deductions for outgoings and expenses. 3. The concept of residence is also irrelevant under the scope of Hong Kong stamp duty. Irrespective of whether a person is a Hong Kong resident or an overseas resident, he/she may have to pay stamp duty if he/she executes the specific instruments in respect of transactions in Hong Kong property, Hong Kong stock or Hong Kong bearer instruments. 4. However, the concept of residence is important when it comes to certain tax reliefs and allowances: (a) Personal assessment, an alternative provided for individual taxpayer to minimise his/her income tax liability, is only available to a Hong Kong permanent resident or a temporary resident. (b) One of the conditions for the parent/grandparent of a taxpayer to be eligible for dependent parent/grandparent allowance is that the parent/grandparent should be a Hong Kong permanent resident. (c) Some tax provisions or incentives are only available to non-Hong Kong resident persons. For example, section 21 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (IRO) only applies to compute the amount of assessable profits derived from Hong Kong by a non-resident person in respect of a trade, profession or business carried on in Hong Kong. Also, sections 20AB-AE apply to exempt non-resident funds in respect of Hong Kong sourced investment profits. 5. Mr. Davidson should be advised that: (a) He is obliged under section 51(1) of the IRO to file the appropriate tax return issued by the Inland Revenue Department. The penalty for non-compliance with filing a tax return is a maximum fine of $10,000 plus three times the tax undercharged (section 80(2))or an additional tax of a maximum of treble the amount of tax undercharged (section 82A). 2 (b) He is obliged to keep rent records for property tax purposes under section 51D. The penalty for non-compliance with keeping rent records is a maximum fine of $10,000 (section 80(1)) (9 marks) (b) Main points to be covered are: 1. In accordance with the principles from the Goepfert case (CIR v Goepfert George Andrew 2HKTC 210), Mr. Davidson’s employment has its source outside Hong Kong: (i) the employment contract in question was entered into and is enforceable outside Hong Kong; (ii) his ultimate employer was PanHealth (US) Limited, which was a US company at all material times; and (iii) his remuneration is paid to him through his bank account outside Hong Kong. It is also supported by the fact that, although Mr. Davidson performed most of his work in Hong Kong, his attachment to the Hong Kong subsidiary, GoodHealth (HK) Limited, was merely a matter of convenience. Moreover, his work was for the benefit of various subsidiary companies in the Asia Pacific region, not only for the Hong Kong subsidiary. However, as Mr. Davidson performed some duties in Hong Kong, he is subject to Hong Kong salaries tax in respect of his income derived from services rendered in Hong Kong. His total employment income will be apportioned based on his time spent in Hong Kong and outside Hong Kong to ascertain the assessable income (section 8(1A)(a)). 2. In respect of the directors’ fee received from GoodHealth (HK) Limited, Mr. Davidson will be subject to Hong Kong salaries tax on the basis that the fee is sourced in Hong Kong. This is because the board meetings of GoodHealth (HK) Limited were held in Hong Kong and thus the company was managed and controlled in Hong Kong. (4 marks) 3. Mr. Davidson Salaries tax assessment for 2006/07 $ $ Employment income [$1,500,000 x (180 + 15 x 180/350)/365] 771,428 Housing benefit: Rental value: (771,428 x 10%) 77,142 Less: rent suffered 12,000 65,142 Director fee 60,000 Assessable income 896,570 Less: Married person’s allowance 200,000 Child allowances 80,000 280,000 Net chargeable income 616,570 Salaries tax liability: 16% of $896,570 143,451 Progressive tax rates ($6,600 + 19% x 526,570) 106,648 (4 marks) 3 4. Mr. Davidson Property tax assessment for 2006/07 $ 1.6 2006 – 31.3.2007 Rent ($30,000 x 10) 300,000 Premium ($80,000 x 10/24) 33,333 Assessable value 333,333 Less: Rates ($2,800/3 x 10) 9,333 324,000 Less: Statutory allowance (20%) 64,800 Net assessable value 259,200 Property tax @16% 41,472 1. The premium is spread over the lease period, which is shorter than the statutory three- year period. 2. The rent deposit is not assessed as it serves only as a security and is not consideration for the right of use of the flat. 3. Rates paid by the landlord during the period of letting are deductible but mortgage loan interest expenses are not deductible under property tax. (6 marks) (c) Main points to be covered are: 1. A valid objection must: a. be in writing; b. state precisely the grounds for objection; c. be received by the Commissioner within one month after the date of the notice of assessment. A late objection can be allowed by the Commissioner if the taxpayer has reasonable excuse such as sickness, absence from Hong Kong, etc.; and d. for an objection to an estimated assessment raised in absence of a tax return; the objection is valid only if the tax return is filed within the specified period as approved by the Commissioner. 2. In Mr. Davidson’s situation, the 2006/07 estimated salaries assessment was issued on 15 April 2008. The one-month period for lodging a valid objection has lapsed. However, as Mr. Davidson was on a business trip and absent from Hong Kong during the one month period, i.e. from 14 April to 16 May 2008, he may lodge a late objection to the Inland Revenue Department using that reason. 3. However, the 2006/07 salaries tax assessment issued to Mr. Davidson was an estimated assessment because of his failure to file his salaries tax return. To validate his objection, Mr. Davidson must also file the salaries tax return in question as soon as allowed by the Commissioner. (3 marks) 4. Mr. Davidson is chargeable to property tax on his rental income from letting of the flat. Under property tax, apart from the deduction of rates agreed and paid by the landlord, only a statutory allowance of 20% is allowable. The actual interest expenses of $51,000 and $142,000 from the two loans used to finance the acquisition of the flat are not allowable under property tax. 4 5. Mr. Davidson is eligible to elect personal assessment for 2006/07: he was a Hong Kong temporary resident in 2006/07 as he spent 195 days in Hong Kong in the year. 6. Mr. Davidson may be able to obtain relief for these interest expenses by electing personal assessment under which the interest expenses of $259,200 (not exceeding the net assessable value ($259,200) of the flat) will be allowable. 7. Whether or not Mr. Davidson’s friend, who was the recipient of the interest, is taxable in respect of his/her interest income, is irrelevant for interest deduction relief. However, the Inland Revenue Department may have to ascertain there is a genuine and arm’s length lending and borrowing transaction between Mr. Davidson and his friend for deduction purposes. (6 marks) (d) Main points to be covered are: 1. The sale and purchase of Hong Kong stock requires a bought note and a sold note for completion of the transaction. The contract notes are subject to stamp duty under Head 2(1) and the amount of stamp duty payable is: $100,000 x 0.2% + $5 = $205. 2. The gifting of Hong Kong stock is operating as a voluntary disposition inter vivos. Therefore the deed of gift attracts stamp duty under Head 2(3). The amount of stamp duty payable is: $25 x 5,000 x 0.2% + $5 = $255. 3. The formal purchase and sale agreement of the residential flat in Hong Kong is subject to stamp duty under Head 1(1A). The amount of stamp duty payable is: $7,000,000 x 3.75% = $262,500. The deed of assignment (conveyance on sale) is also subject to stamp duty at a nominal amount of $100 if the formal purchase and sale agreement was duly stamped. 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Contents the Year 2002 in Review Major Events of Hong Kong
    List of Contents The year 2002 in review Major events of Hong Kong securities market 2002 Market highlights Cash market - Main board Cash market - Growth enterprise market (GEM) Derivatives market Clearing statistics Exchange participants The investing community Hong Kong stock market historical events Appendices The Year 2002 in Review The Year The Year 2002 in Review The Hong Kong economy remained weak in 2002 but trade figures began to turn around in the second half of the year. Benefiting from the weakening US dollar and strong demand in the Mainland of China, Hong Kong’s total exports regained double-digit growth over a year earlier in the third quarter of 2002. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate also fell from its historical peak of 7.8% in July 2002 to 7.2% in December 2002. However, the domestic sector remained sluggish in both investment and consumer spending. The latest economic forecast suggests a 2% growth in real terms of GDP and a 3% decline in the Composite Consumer Price Index for 2002. The trading performance of the Hong Kong securities and futures markets further weakened during the year. Hang Seng Index fell 18.2% from the previous year to end at 9,321.29. The average daily turnover of the Main Board also declined to HK$6,474 million, 19.3% less than that in 2001. The GEM Index ended at 110.4 at end of December 2002, representing a decrease of 44.6% from the previous year. The average daily turnover of the GEM improved slightly to HK$178 million in 2002, an increase of 9.9% from 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • INLAND REVENUE BOARD of REVIEW DECISIONS Case No. D5
    INLAND REVENUE BOARD OF REVIEW DECISIONS Case No. D5/93 Salaries tax – whether certain travel and entertainment expenses could be deducted from the assessable income of the taxpayer. Panel: William Turnbull (chairman), Philip Fu Yuen Ko and Richard Lee. Date of hearing: 3 March 1993. Date of decision: 27 April 1993. The taxpayer was employed as an assistant sales manager and claimed as a deduction from his assessable income certain expenses being entertainment and travelling. In support of his claim he provided certain vouchers issued by various restaurants on which he had written the names of customers and a schedule of travelling expenses. The employer of the taxpayer paid to the taxpayer a travelling allowance which the taxpayer claimed should not be subject to salaries tax. Held: The entire travel allowance was subject to assessment to tax. The taxpayer could claim a deduction of the actual amount of the travel expenses which he had incurred. With regard to the entertainment expenses the Board was not satisfied that the taxpayer had incurred the entertainment expenses and noted that he had not claimed reimbursement of the same from his employer even though he was entitled so to do. Appeal dismissed. Cases referred to: D17/93, IRBRD, vol 1, 113 CIR v Humphrey 1 HKTC 451 Lomax v Newton 34 TC 558 D36/90, IRBRD, vol 5, 295 May Chan for the Commissioner of Inland Revenue. Taxpayer in person. Decision: INLAND REVENUE BOARD OF REVIEW DECISIONS This is an appeal by a salaries taxpayer against a determination of the Deputy Commissioner for Inland Revenue which refused to allow the Taxpayer to deduct certain travel and entertainment expenses from his assessable income.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Tax Summary
    Appendix I Tax Summary ppendix I provides a summary of the tax system Each tax is described in terms of the relevant leg- a jp—4as of July 1, 1997. The tables start with a de- islative act, the definition of the tax base, the main scription of taxes levied by the central government exemptions and deductions that are applicable and followed by taxes levied by local governments. the tax rates. 71 Tax Summary as of July I, 1997 Tax Base Exemptions and Deductions Rates A. Central Government 1. Taxes on income and profits I.I Taxes on corporations Law No. 157/1981 amended by Law An annual tax on accrued net taxable Deductions allowed cover all business Profits above LE 18,000 a year (subject to No. 187/1993. profits earned in Egypt by both foreign expenses, including actual rent or the above deductions, exemptions, and so and domestic corporations (including estimated rental value of premises, wage forth) are taxed as follows: limited partnerships, joint stock and bonuses to be statutorily granted to companies, and public sector enterprises) workers, social security contributions on Industrial and export engaged in manufacturing, commerce, their behalf, savings fund and pension profits 32 percent banking, mining, real estate brokerage, fund contributions (up to 20 percent of Profits from oil exploration commercial leasing activities, and so the wage bill), inventory costs, interest, production 40.55 percent forth. Tax year is calendar year unless royalties, remunerations to Board of Other profits 40 percent stated otherwise in company's articles. Directors and allowances to major shareholders to attend general meetings, In addition, a development duty of Taxable profits include: subscriptions to governments, 2 percent is applied to all profits above contributions to charitable and social LE 18,000 annually.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chief Executive's 2020 Policy Address
    The Chief Executive’s 2020 Policy Address Striving Ahead with Renewed Perseverance Contents Paragraph I. ‌Foreword: Striving Ahead 1–3 II. ‌Full Support of the Central Government 4–8 III. ‌Upholding “One Country, Two Systems” 9–29 Staying True to Our Original Aspiration 9–10 Improving the Implementation of “One Country, Two Systems” 11–20 The Chief Executive’s Mission 11–13 Hong Kong National Security Law 14–17 National Flag, National Emblem and National Anthem 18 Oath-taking by Public Officers 19–20 Safeguarding the Rule of Law 21–24 Electoral Arrangements 25 Public Finance 26 Public Sector Reform 27–29 IV. ‌Navigating through the Epidemic 30–35 Staying Vigilant in the Prolonged Fight against the Epidemic 30 Together, We Fight the Virus 31 Support of the Central Government 32 Adopting a Multi-pronged Approach 33–34 Sparing No Effort in Achieving “Zero Infection” 35 Paragraph V. ‌New Impetus to the Economy 36–82 Economic Outlook 36 Development Strategy 37 The Mainland as Our Hinterland 38–40 Consolidating Hong Kong’s Status as an International Financial Centre 41–46 Maintaining Financial Stability and Striving for Development 41–42 Deepening Mutual Access between the Mainland and Hong Kong Financial Markets 43 Promoting Real Estate Investment Trusts in Hong Kong 44 Further Promoting the Development of Private Equity Funds 45 Family Office Business 46 Consolidating Hong Kong’s Status as an International Aviation Hub 47–49 Three-Runway System Development 47 Hong Kong-Zhuhai Airport Co-operation 48 Airport City 49 Developing Hong Kong into
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong SAR
    Hong Kong SAR 104 Doing Business in Asia Pacific SEPTEMBER 2020 Chapter 1: Introduction 108 Chapter 2: Business environment 110 2.1 Hong Kong’s free economy 110 2.2 Gateway to mainland China 111 2.3 International outlook 112 2.4 Well-established legal and financial infrastructures 112 2.5 Favourable tax regime 113 Chapter 3: Business and corporate structures 114 3.1 Limited company 114 3.2 Unincorporated businesses 116 3.3 Forms of business collaboration 116 Chapter 4: Takeovers (friendly M&A) 117 4.1 Introduction 117 4.2 Hong Kong company law 118 4.3 Other common legal issues 118 4.4 Typical documentation 119 4.5 Due diligence 120 4.6 Sale and purchase agreement 120 Chapter 5: Foreign investment 122 5.1 Overview of Hong Kong’s business and investment environment 122 5.2 Restrictions on foreign investment 123 Chapter 6: Restructuring and insolvency 124 6.1 Legal framework 124 6.2 Liquidation 124 6.3 Restructuring 125 6.4 International insolvency 126 Doing Business in Asia Pacific SEPTEMBER 2020 105 Chapter 7: Employment, industrial relations, and work health and safety 127 7.1 Basic employment rights 127 7.2 Employment contract 128 7.3 Expatriates 129 7.4 Termination 129 7.5 Work health and safety 130 Chapter 8: Taxation 131 8.1 Outline 131 8.2 Profits tax 131 8.3 Salaries tax 133 8.4 Property tax 134 8.5 Stamp duty 134 8.6 Tax disputes 135 8.7 Anti-avoidance 135 Chapter 9: Intellectual property 135 9.1 Trademarks 136 9.2 Copyright 136 9.3 Registered designs 137 9.4 Patents 137 9.5 Confidential information 138 9.6 Private information 138
    [Show full text]
  • HONG KONG LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 16 May 1984 947
    HONG KONG LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ― 16 May 1984 947 OFFICIAL REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS Wednesday, 16 May 1984 The Council met at half past two o’clock PRESENT HIS EXCELLENCY THE ACTING GOVERNOR (PRESIDENT) THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF SECRETARY SIR CHARLES PHILIP HADDON-CAVE. K.B.E., C.M.G., J.P. THE HONOURABLE THE FINANCIAL SECRETARY SIR JOHN HENRY BREMRIDGE, K.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MR. MICHAEL DAVID THOMAS, Q.C. THE HONOURABLE DENIS CAMPBELL BRAY. C.M.G., C.V.O., J.P. SECRETARY FOR HOME AFFAIRS DR. THE HONOURABLE HARRY FANG SIN-YANG, C.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FRANCIS YUAN-HAO TIEN. O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALEX WU SHU-CHIH. C.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHEN SHOU-LUM, C.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LYDIA DUNN, C.B.E., J.P. THE REVD. THE HONOURABLE PATRICK TERENCE McGOVERN. O.B.E., S.J., J.P. THE HONOURABLE PETER C. WONG. O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG LAM, O.B.E., J.P. DR. THE HONOURABLE THONG KAH-LEONG. C.B.E., J.P. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES THE HONOURABLE CHARLES YEUNG SIU-CHO. O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE JOHN MARTIN ROWLANDS, C.B.E., J.P. SECRETARY FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE DR. THE HONOURABLE HO KAM-FAI, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW SO KWOK-WING, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE GERALD PAUL NAZARETH, Q.C., J.P. LAW DRAFTSMAN THE HONOURABLE WONG PO-YAN, O.B.E., J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yet-To-Be Effective but Effective Tax: Hong Kong's Buyer's Stamp
    The Yet-to-be Effective But Effective Tax: Hong Kong’s Buyer’s Stamp Duty as A Critical Case Study of Legislation by Press Release Jianlin Chen ** When a government announces that an existing law will be amended, and that the amendment, when finally enacted by the legislature, will be made effective from the announcement date, it is natural and inevitable that private entities will conduct their activities on the basis of the amended law immediately upon the announcement date, notwithstanding the announcement’s lack of any formal legal effect. This practice of effecting immediate de facto legal changes is known derisively, but perhaps aptly, as “legislation by press release.” This Article utilizes the recent use of legislation by press release to implement the Buyer’s Stamp Duty in Hong Kong as a case study to critically examine the legality and normative considerations of this increasingly common but under-theorized practice. Legally, this Article argues that the prospective notice provided by the initial announcement ensures the practice’s legality in all but an explicit prohibition of retrospective civil legislation. Normatively, this Article highlights the various criteria of clarity, consistency, necessity and political dynamic that affect the desirability of the practice. On a broader note, the formal retrospectivity inherent in the practice - but which does not disrupt the reliance interests of private entities - provides a useful reexamination of the conventional aversion towards retrospective laws. **Assistant Law Professor (University of Hong Kong), JSD Candidate (University of Chicago), LLM (University of Chicago), LLB (University of Singapore). Admitted to the bar in New York and Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Tax Update Seminar 2020 - 2021
    Hong Kong Tax Update Seminar 2020 - 2021 BENEFITS OF ATTENDING/ LEARNING OUTCOMES From 1 January 2020 to 30 November 2020, Commissioner of Inland Revenue issued one New Inland Revenue Departmental Interpretation and Practice Notes (DIPN) No. 61, and revised 15 existing DIPNs. Three new pieces of legislation were enacted to amend the Inland Revenue Ordinance and Stamp duty Ordinance, and one case was recently decided. The objective of this seminar is to provide an understanding of the new tax law and practice. PROGRAM OVERVIEW AND KEY TOPICS ⚫ New principles governing permanent establishment ⚫ Transfer pricing rule after the abolition of section 20 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ⚫ New deduction rules for research & development expenditure ⚫ Environmental protection installations ⚫ Various concessionary deductions under salaries tax from 2019/20 onward ⚫ Separate personal assessment and other new personal assessment arrangement from 2018/19 onward ⚫ New development of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) ⚫ New stamp duty treatment on transfer of immovable property Speaker Profile Mr Patrick Ho is the author of the book “Hong Kong Taxation and Tax Planning”. He has more than 35 years’ experience in tax practice, university teaching and in-house teaching in all the Big 4. Who Should Attend Students of professional accounting bodies, commercial accountants, officers of human resource department, tax professionals and auditors. Language Fee: HK$560 Cantonese (Handout in English) (Four hours in total, Part A & Part B) Date Time Venue Speaker/ Organisation Part A : 14 Apr 2021 (Wed) Hong Kong School of Mr. Patrick Ho, LL.B, LL.M., MBA, MCS, PCLL, 19:00 –21:00 Part B : 16 Apr 2021 (Fri) Commerce FCPA Barrister-at-law (ONE REGISTRATION FORM FOR ONE PERSON ONLY) Cheques should be made payable to: “Hong Kong School of Commerce” Full Name: HKID: Gender M / F Telephone No: Email: Cheque No.: Bank: Please tick the appropriate box if receipt is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Budget Summary 2005
    Tricor, a member of the Bank of East Asia Group, is a leading professional provider of April 2005 Vol. 2, No.2 integrated business, corporate and investor services in Hong Kong, Greater China and South East Asia. Our services include Accounting, Company Formation, Corporate Governance & Company Secretarial, Executive Search & Selection, Initial Public Offerings & Share Registration, Payroll, Fund and Trust Administration. Tricor has built its reputation and professional expertise through the acquisition of the corporate service businesses of three of the “Big 4” international accounting firms: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and Ernst & Young in Hong Kong, and PricewaterhouseCoopers in Hong Kong and Singapore. Our mission is to be The Business Enabler of choice. Principal Tricor subsidiaries Abacus Share Registrars Limited Barbinder & Co Pte Ltd Evatthouse Corporate Services Pte Ltd Outsource Centre Pte Ltd Secretaries Limited Standard Registrars Limited Member of the BEA Group Strath Corporate Services Limited Tengis Limited Tricor Executive Resources Limited Please visit our website at www.tricor.com.hk Tricor Investor Services Limited © 2005 Tricor Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. E-mail: [email protected] MemberMember ofof thethe BEABEA GroupGroup Beijing Hong Kong Macau Shanghai Singapore Tortola (BVI) Tricor Consultancy Tricor Services Limited Tengis Business Services Shanghai Tricor Tengis Tricor Singapore Pte Tricor International (Beijing) Limited 28/F, BEA Harbour View Limited Consultancy Limited Limited Trustee Limited Suite 1808-1809 Centre 17 Andar E Room 3109-17 #11-00 PWC Building, East Asia Chambers, P.O. China World Tower 1 56 Gloucester Road Praia Grande Commercial 31/F Shanghai Central 8 Cross Street, Box 901 China World Trade Centre Wanchai, Hong Kong Centre Plaza Singapore 048424 Road Town, Tortola 1 Jian Guo Men Wai No.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Analysis Hong Kong Tax
    Tax Issue H57/2014 – 25 March 2014 Tax Analysis Hong Kong Tax Hong Kong’s new Companies Ordinance creates opportunities for tax-free Hong Kong SAR amalgamations Davy Yun Tax Partner Hong Kong’s new Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) (New CO), which Tel: +852 2852 6538 became effective on 3 March 2014, includes a broad range of measures Email: [email protected] designed to enhance corporate governance, ensure better regulation, facilitate business and modernize the law itself. Among the measures to Karen Chow facilitate business reorganizations, the New CO introduces a new concept Tax Director of amalgamation under court-free procedures that should allow intra-group Tel: +852 2852 5609 mergers to be carried out in a simpler and less costly manner, as compared Email: [email protected] to the traditional court-sanctioned procedures. However, there is some uncertainty about the Hong Kong (and foreign) tax treatment of court-free amalgamations. Despite requests for clarification of the tax consequences of the new amalgamation procedure and/or interpretive guidelines, Hong Kong’s Inland Revenue Department (IRD) has not indicated that it plans to issue guidance or practice notes. The potential tax exposure of a court-free amalgamation could be an important factor and cost when a taxpayer is assessing whether to proceed with such an amalgamation or to pursue other alternatives, such as a normal transfer of a business and assets. In the absence of clarifying guidance or amendments to the Inland Revenue Ordinance (IRO), potential tax risks and exposures could actually undermine the stated purpose of the New CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong: Changes to Double Tax Relief for Salaries
    Insights from Global Mobility Hong Kong: Changes to double tax relief for salaries tax August 7, 2018 In brief The lengthy tax legislation that implements a transfer pricing regime and key actions arising from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project in Hong Kong was gazetted as Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No.6) Ordinance 2018 on July 13, 2018. Although the new tax legislation mostly covers the issues on BEPS, it also introduces various changes to salaries tax, in particular, the income exclusion claim under section 8(1A)(c) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (IRO) as a means for double tax relief. In detail available where foreign tax has claim from two years to six Changes to income exclusion been paid in a non-DTA years after the end of the claim jurisdiction for services relevant year of assessment; rendered in that jurisdiction. Under the new legislation, a This change applies from year of imposes an obligation on Hong Kong salaries taxpayer assessment 2018/19. salaries taxpayers to notify who is also subject to foreign tax the Commissioner of Inland for services rendered in a Additional changes Revenue in writing of any foreign jurisdiction having a The new legislation also subsequent adjustment to double tax agreement (DTA) introduces the following with Hong Kong (DTA the amount of foreign tax changes that may impact paid or payable that results jurisdiction) may only claim a salaries taxpayers. The new in the double tax relief tax credit for the foreign tax law: paid under section 50 of the previously granted by Hong IRO and the relevant DTA as a requires salaries taxpayers to Kong to become excessive relief for double taxation.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Tax Bulletin Spring 2021 in This Editioneurope BRUSSELS We Are Pleased to Present the Springlondon 2021 Edition Ofdü SSELDORF PARIS Our Firm’S Asia Tax Bulletin
    Asia Tax Bulletin Spring 2021 In This EditionEUROPE BRUSSELS We are pleased to present the SpringLONDON 2021 edition ofDÜ SSELDORF PARIS our firm’s Asia Tax Bulletin. FRANKFURT ORK BEIJING Dear Reader, GTON DChow to compute eligible IP (royalty) income for the reduced income tax rate; and Thailand’s As the world struggles to recover from the TOKYO CHARLOTTE introduction of VAT on overseas digital services pandemic, business continues regardless and consumed in Thailand with effect from SHANGHAI the tax authorities appear to have little 1 September 2021. trouble keeping up, at least judging from DUBAI HONG KONG developments over the past three months. This edition also contains some interesting HANOI case law in various Asian countries. We This edition of the Asia Tax Bulletin covers the hope you enjoy reading it. highlights, inter alia including the tax proposals HO CHI MINH CITY in the 2021 budgets in Hong Kong, India and Stay safe and don’t give in to the Singapore; China’s draft stamp duty law and current challenges. simplified APA procedure; the long-awaited SINGAPORE carried interest concession proposed by the Hong Kong tax authority; India’s launch of the With kind regards, Faceless Penalty Scheme and an e-portal to Pieter de Ridder report tax evasion; the IndonesianBRASÍLI tax A* authorities’ clarification on the offshore tax VITÓRIA* exemption treatment of expats living in * Indonesia – as well as the dividend withholding RIO DE JANEIRO tax exemption criteria for Indonesian SÃO PAULO* companies; Korea’s tax law changes for 2021;
    [Show full text]