DOCSLIB.ORG

Bills of Mortality Yf F&R Reienc^Yea^; Ala

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bills of Mortality Yf F&R Reienc^Yea^; Ala LOCf DOSE’S 'Dreadful Vifit* An: Or A Co'uection of All che Bills of Mortality yf F&r reienc^Yea^; aLa . jf Beginning the 2o th or and ending rhe ipth.of December following: As alfo, The Cy ElSf E A L or whole years DILL : According to the Report made to the King’s Moft Excellent Majcfty, By the Company of Parifh-Clerks of London, &c l u D o 2^: Printed and are to fold by E, Cotes living in Alderfgate-flreet: Printer to che laid Company i 6 6k, The Printer the Reader. t Courteous (Reader, Prefume that the Candor of thy Ingenuity is fiich, 1 IpS*, that thou wilt not rafaly condemn me of 1m- St821 prudence in the Reprinting thefe /ad facets. Firft undcrftand the Reafons moving me SiPV thereunto, and then I am fomewhat confi- dent that thou wilt Approve ofmy Defign. I know that Romances and Play-books too much gratifie che Humours of the Populace j but humble and lincere with Delight recall to mindcGods Mercies, and with Awfulnds tremble at His Judgments: Behold, the enfuing Papers will afflft thy Meditation in both: Confider His Mercy to 7 hce Mee that we are in the Land of the to )Vo'rk and , yet Living, cut our Salvation V?ith Fear and Irembling: His ‘judgments on many Jheufands in or near this City, whom He hath in . One. year foept altay with the fiee/ome of a Temporal 'DeJlruElton : O let us not imagine, that they were greater Sinners than we the Survivors! for, Except “toefpeedily and fmoufay Pepent, V?e faall all hke'tot/eperip?, either CertitudmePrenre: but I am a Printer no Preacher $ I fhall therelorc wave fuch DKcourfe,. and briefly, yet perlpicuoufly, rentier a taithfull Account, why I undertook this Publication. In the year 1615. the ftroke of the Lords hand was heavy upon this City and Suburbs, which year was ever fince called: To the ‘Reader The Great (Plague: Now though thou haft teen probably fe- veral Printed General Reports, given in by the Parijh Clerks in am not able to Recover all that year ; yet I the particular Weekly Bills thereof; the fight of them hath been much defircd thefe times-, but it is beyond my power, as yet, to anfwer mens ex- pectations. That Pofterity may not any more be at fucli a lofs, I refolved to communicate unto the Nation, theft fubft- quent leaves: In all humility befteching the Omnipotent, to conferr upon us,(uch an uniforme and cordial Repentance that every one of us may fearchoutthe Plague oi his own Heart and Brain, and Purge our [elves, by Hisgratious afliftance, from all filthinefs of Befh and Spirit ■ that fo He may in the riches of His tender Compaflion, return in favour to this finful City, and reftore Health to our Habitations: That neither the Phyfitians of our Souls or Bodies, may hereafter in fuch great numbers forfake us, and that neithermy felf, or any other ofmy Profefiion, may have occafion,for the future, to Print iuch Dreadful lines, ! London * From the 20 of December to the 27, • I664. I • ' i i Bur. Flag. Bur. Flag, Bur. Pkg* S' A Lban Woodftrcet- S' George Botolphlane— S' Martin Ludgatc——— — JL\.Alhallows Barking 2 S' Gregory by S' Pauls— 2 S' MartinOrg&rs — 2 j iTiinailow's oreaaitreer— S' Jamp* Flukes p|»rr— I 2 Alhallows Horvhnc S' James Garlickhitho— S' Matthew Fridav-lrect- Alhallows Lelie— 2 S' John Baptift l S' Maudlin Milkftreet— Alhallows Lumbardftreet 2 S' John Evangclilt--—-< S' Maudlu: OldBihftrcet- I Alhaliows Stayning- S' John Zachary S' Mich? : Bali: haw— I Alhallows the Wall S' Katharine Coleman— S' Michael Cornhil 1 — S' Alphagc — ■ S' Katharine Ctcchurch- S' Michael Crookcdlane I S c Andrew Htrbbard I S' Lawrence Jewry I S' Michael Qucenhithe- S' Andrew Underihaft— I S' Lawrence Pcruntncy— S' Michael Quern c ! S Andrew Wardrobe -— 3 S' Leonard Eaftcheap S' Michael Roval r S' Am Alderfgate 1 S' Leonard Foftcrlanc— S' Michael Woodftrcet- r2 S’ 1 Ann Blackfryers- S' Magnus Parifh— — I S' Mildred Brcadftrccr— S r Atulioiins Parifh S' Margaret Lothbury— S' Mildred Poultrcy I S' Auftins Parifh S' Margaret Mofcs- S' Nicholas Aeons- S' BartholomcwExchange S' Margaret Newfifhftre. I S' Nicholas Colcabby— 3 S' Bcnncc F nek S' Margaret Pattons S' Nicholas Oiaves 1 S' Bcnnet Graccchurch- S' Mary Abchurch- S' Oiave H-mftreet Sc Bennct Pauifrrharf-— 3 S' Mary Aldcrmanbury- S' Oiave Jewry S' Bcnncc Shcrchog S' Mary Aldcrmary- I S' Oiave Silverftrcct 2 — 1 S' Botolph Billingfgate- iS' Mary 1c Bow- S' Pancras Sopcrlanc— 2 S' Chriftophcrs — S' Mary Colcchurch— S' Peter Cornhil- ■— S c Clement Eaftcheap-— S' Mary Hill-— .— S' Peter Paulfwharf x 1 S' Dunftan Eaft- 1 S' Mary Sommerfec- S' Steven CoJcmanftrect « S' Edmund Lumbardftr. 1 S' Mary Stayning-— S' Steven Walbrook— 1 S' Ethelbccough- 1 S' Mary Woolchutch— I S' Swithin - ■ n S' Faith S' Marv Woolnoth —— —— 1 St*Foftcr- 3 S'Martin Iremongcrlanc Trinity Parifh— — S' Gabriel Fen-church-— Buried in tbt 97 Parijhet within the "alls s - 60 Plague- — O S' Andrew Holhcrr l 9 S' Botolph Aldgatt 12 Saviours Southwark 8 1 S' Bartholomew Great-— 5 S' Botolph Bifhoprgacc— 9 S Sepulchres parifh- •’ z 1 1 1 S' Bartholomew Lefts-— a S' Dunftan Weft — 3 S' Thomas Southwark— — z I S' Bridget * S' George Southwark— Trinity Minories— | * j Bridewel Prednd 1 S' Giles Cripplcgatc— 7 At the Pcfthoufc — | * l S' Botolph Aldcrlgatc— 1S' Oiavc Southwark- 4 1 Buried in tbs 1 6 Pari(hts without the tVaXs. and at tbt Peftbiufe— 12 $ Phgir— 0 ■— S' Giles in the fields c 4 I Lambeth Parifh— 2 S' Mary Iflington — 1 Hackney Parifh S' Leonard Shoreditch— 9 S' Marv Whicechappcl- 8 S' James Clerkcnwcl— 3 S' Magdalen Bcrmondfey f Rochorirh Pa-rift;- — S' K&th. near the Tower 4 S' Mary Newington Stepney Parifh — 18 turkd in tbt 12 tut Parifhet I* Mrddiefc* and Surrcr - 67 Plague—— I 1 Martin in ll . 3' Clement Danes 8 1 IS' the fields— 7 ( S' Margaret Weftminfler 1 14 1 : Paul Covent Garden*- 1 (S Mary Savoy-- ’-"—I 1 Waeretf at ibz Pcfthoufc—■ Buncd in the £ in the City and libertirstf Wcftminftcr-— 3 9 Plague— O .. J "The Difeafes and C afualties this Wee\, Jaundies — x Infants-— —-— 1Q Killed in a Crane at Alhallows 1 Barking — , Kingfevil—: —. — t Overlaid * 1 Pallic —— 1 Plague 1 - 2 Kickcis , j ABortiveAged — 23 Riling of the Lights 5 * — Apoplcxie 2 Scurvy — 1 Canker 1 Sore Breft — 1 Childbed— . 5 Spotted Fcavcr-——■■ . 1 Chrifomcs 6 Stilbora —— S Confumptkm- — Stone * 1 Convulfion 2 3 Stopping of the ftomach 3 Dropfie —■ 15 Suddenly 3 Executed-- —1 Surfeit * 4 Feavcr- * 2 9 Teeth 17 Plot and Small-pox— — 23 Thrufh — 1 French-pox- 1 Xiflick — 2 Griping in the Guts 2 i. Winde * 1 Headache —> *—* 1 Wormes ———— 2 Me^d-ipould-fbot——* t :Malea—~. ntf | Males—— 144“ Cbrtftned' IFemales— r 13 Buried Females—J 147* Plague— t Lin all —* 22y . In all 29 1 1 Occrcalcd in the Burials this Week 24 Plague Paridies clear ofthe -t 2 o Parishes Infedfced — I Lord Mdor g Aflize of Bread jetforth by Ordert cf the and Court of penny Whcatcn Loaf to contain Eleven Ounces r and three half-penny White Loaves the like weight. i London 2 From the 27 ot December to the 3 ofJanuary. 1664 Bur. Plag. Bur. Plag. Bur. jPJa S' A Lban Woodftreet- 2 S' George Bocolphlane— S' Martin Ludgatc- 2 XLAlhailows Barking I S' Gregory bj S' Pauls— 4 S' Martin Orgars——— Aiiuiiow lirciuiuCCL Dukes 1 itimiiv TV Q VJfltcLL-" S' James place— Alhallows Honylanc S' James' Garliekhithe— 1 S' Matthew Fridavftrect- 11 Alhallows Lumbardftreec I S' John Evangelift- S' MaudlinOUfiftiftrcet-* Alhallows Stayning- S' John Zachary I S' Michael Baliilhaw-— Alhallows the Wail S' Katharine Coleman— S' Michael Cornhil S' Alphage S' Katharine Crcchurch- S' Michael Crookedlane S' Andrew Hubbard I S' Lawrence Jewry S' Michael Quccnhiche- Sc Andrew llnderlhaft— 2 S' Lawrence Poaintney— S' Michael Quern I S' Andrew Wardrobe — S' Leonard Eaftchcap I S' Michael Koyal T4 S' Ann Aldcrfgatc S' Leonard Folicrlanc— I S' Michael Woodftreet- 2 ' S' AnnBlackfryas- 4 S' Magnus Parilh 3 S' Mildred Hrcadftrcct— S' Anrholins Parifti S' Margaret Lothbury— 1 S' Mildred Poultrcy S c M,arg»rer Mofes-— i S' BartholomewExchange S' Margaret Ncwfifhftrc. S' Nicholas Colcabby—- S' Bcnncc Fynck 2 S' Margaret Pattons S' Nicholas Olaves S' Bcnncc Graccchurch- S' Mary Abchurch- 1 S' Olavc Harcftrcct- 2 S c Bcnncc Pan I {wharf-— z S' Mary Aldermanbury- S' Olavc Jewry S' Bcnncc Shcrehog I S' Mary Aldcrmary. 2 S' Olavc Silverftreer 2 S'-Botolph BilUnifgatc- 2 S' Mary Ic Bow S' Pancras Sopcilanc-— — ' Cbrift Church I S' Mary Bochaw S' Peter Cheap — S' Chriftophers S' Mary Colcchurch-— S' Peter Cornhil 1 j v/iciiithi tLAUcacap- S' Dionis Backchurcn-— I S' Mary Moimthaw 1 S' Peter Poor- —— 3 S' Dunftan Eaft- 3 S' Mary Sommerfet 1 S' Steven Colcmanftrcet 2 S' Edmund Lumbardftr. S' Mary Stayning— S' Steven Walbrook-— Sc Ethclbotough- S' Mary Woolchurch— S' Swithin S' Fofter—■ 1 — — S' Martin Iremongcrlanc 1 3 . S' Gabriel Fcnchurch-— * 1 Buried in the 97Ptrifhes within the if nils - 66 Pldg*f<- O S' Holbctn IS'Botolph Aldgare • l 7 Saviours Southwark 10 Andrew 17 L S' Bartholomew Great— 1 ,^ Bocolph Bifhcpigate— io S Sepulchres Parilh l 7 S E Bartholomew Lefle— 2 Dunftan Wm —• 7 S' Thomas Southwark— 3 — S' Bridget — 5 (S' George Southwark— 3 Trinity Wineries Bridcwel Prccind; j S Gilc s Cripplcgnc— 23 At the Pefthcufe S' Bocolph Aldcrfgatc— 6 S' Oiave Southwark-— 15 Buried in the 16 P tribes withtut the H’tUs, tend u the Pefthtufe-— I y6 PUgltf- O Sl Giles in the fields-— 16 Lambeth Parilh 4 S' Mary Iflingcon- 1 1 Hackney Parilh- 6 S' Lconard’Shorcditch— ) S' Mary Whircchappcl- r 7 S' James Clerktnwcl— 9 S' Magdalen Hermondlcy 4 HorhofithWrii h- S' Kath.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London and Middlesex in the 1660S Introduction: the Early Modern
    London and Middlesex in the 1660s Introduction: The early modern metropolis first comes into sharp visual focus in the middle of the seventeenth century, for a number of reasons. Most obviously this is the period when Wenceslas Hollar was depicting the capital and its inhabitants, with views of Covent Garden, the Royal Exchange, London women, his great panoramic view from Milbank to Greenwich, and his vignettes of palaces and country-houses in the environs. His oblique birds-eye map- view of Drury Lane and Covent Garden around 1660 offers an extraordinary level of detail of the streetscape and architectural texture of the area, from great mansions to modest cottages, while the map of the burnt city he issued shortly after the Fire of 1666 preserves a record of the medieval street-plan, dotted with churches and public buildings, as well as giving a glimpse of the unburned areas.1 Although the Fire destroyed most of the historic core of London, the need to rebuild the burnt city generated numerous surveys, plans, and written accounts of individual properties, and stimulated the production of a new and large-scale map of the city in 1676.2 Late-seventeenth-century maps of London included more of the spreading suburbs, east and west, while outer Middlesex was covered in rather less detail by county maps such as that of 1667, published by Richard Blome [Fig. 5]. In addition to the visual representations of mid-seventeenth-century London, a wider range of documentary sources for the city and its people becomes available to the historian.
    [Show full text]
  • A JOURNAL of the PLAGUE YEAR (Revisited Classics)1
    HYGEIA, Revista Brasileira de Geografia Médica e da Saúde - www.hygeia.ig.ufu.br/ ISSN: 1980-1726 A JOURNAL OF THE PLAGUE YEAR (revisited classics)1 By Daniel Defoe being observations or memorials of the most remarkable occurrences, as well public as private, which happened in London during the last great visitation in 1665. Written by a Citizen who continued all the while in London. Never made public before It was about the beginning of September, 1664, that I, among the rest of my neighbors, heard in ordinary discourse that the plague was returned again in Holland; for it had been very violent there, and particularly at Amsterdam and Rotterdam, in the year 1663, whither, they say, it was brought (some said from Italy, others from the Levant) among some goods which were brought home by their Turkey fleet; others said it was brought from Candia; others, from Cyprus. It mattered not from whence it came; but all agreed it was come into Holland again. We had no such thing as printed newspapers in those days, to spread rumors and reports of things, and to improve them by the invention of men, as I have lived to see practiced since. But such things as those were gathered from the letters of merchants and others who corresponded abroad, and from them was handed about by word of mouth only; so that things did not spread instantly over the whole nation, as they do now. But it seems that the government had a true account of it, and several counsels were held about ways to prevent its coming over; but all was kept very private.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Mortality
    BILLS OF MORTALITY BY WILLIAM A. BREND, M.A., M.B., B .Sc. / 4 .* [Reprinted from Transactions of the Medico-Legal Society, 1907 — 1908 ] LONDON BAILLIEEE, TINDALL AND COX 8, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN 1908 t l 3694 Year this Burials the in Decreafed ) BILLS OF MORTALITY. The custom of recording births, marriages, and deaths is of very ancient origin. In Genesis v. and xi. are given the births, ages, and deaths of the descendants of Adam to the birth of Noah, and from Noah to the twelve patriarchs. Moses counted the Israelites, and recorded the numbers of each of the tribes. Nehemiah, after “ the return from the Captivity in Babylon, says : I found the book of the genealogy of them which came up at the first ” (vii. 5). In Borne, a register of deaths (ratio LibUince was kept in the temple of Libitina, the goddess of the dead, and a regulation, ascribed to Scrvius Tullius, required that for every death a piece of money, known as the lucar Libitince, should be deposited in the temple. Marcus Aurelius ordained that all free persons should give notice of a birth within thirty days, and a record of these was kept in the temple of Saturn. In medieval times, registers appear to have been kept in France as early as 1308, but not much can be learned ^about them. In Spain, Cardinal Ximenes in 1497 ordered registers to be kept in every parish, in order to terminate the disorders arising from the marriage of persons between whom there was spiritual affinity. Parish registers in England were first instituted by Thomas Cromwell in 1538.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Mortality [London]
    6 - %'.t ' i [Death and the O’d Man. From ITolhein’s Dance of Death.] CXL.—BILLS OF MORTALITY. In the week ending the 18th of November, 1843, the number of deaths in the mctiopolis exceeded the average mortality by upwards of three hundred. There was once a time when a fact like this would have produced a panic among tlie citizens, and have arrested the gaieties of the West End; for an increase in the fatality of ordinary diseases was generally regarded as a precursor of the Plague : but, excepting members of the medical profession, undertakers, and sextons (whom it must not be considered ungracious thus to link together), this increase of one-fourth in the number of deaths is unknown to nearly all the world besides a sure sign of the little interest uhich it excites, when scarcely common gossip adopts it as a “ topic of the day.” It was with the view of communicating to the inhabitants of London, to the Court, and the constituted authorities of the City accurate information respecting the increase or decrease in the number of deaths, and the casualties of mortality occurring amongst them, that the Bills of Morta- lity were first commenced. London was then seldom entirely free from the Plague, and the publication of the Bills was calculated to calm exaggerated lumours; and to n^arn those who could do so conveniently to leave London whenever the pestilence became more fatal than usual. The Bills were first com- menced in 1592, during a time when the Plague was busy with its ravages, but they were not continued uninterruptedly until the occurrence of another Plague, in 1603, from which period up to the present time they have been continued from week to week, excepting during the Great Fire, when the deaths of two or three weeks were given in one Bill.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE ANATOMY OF A PLAGUE: A GLIMPSE OF AN EPIDEMIC THROUGH THE OBSERVATIONS OF ONE LONDON PARISH A BACHELOR THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AT THE UNIVERISTY OF WISCONSIN–EAU CLAIRE BY ELIZABETH OLSON R.N., BSN EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN MAY 2010 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire with the consent of the author. Abstract The Great Plague of London in 1665 was the last major outbreak of the bubonic plague in Great Britain. The wide effects of the plague impacted every aspect of the population. There is much research on the plague and the effects on Tudor-Stuart England. However, much of the research fails to combine not only a historical/demographic analysis of the 1665 plague, but also biomedical model of the plague. This study combines the biomedical model of plague research with a historical demographic model. St. Giles of Cripplegate is utilized as a representational case study for the impacts of the 1665 plague of London. The parish records from St. Giles of Cripplegate are used for the demographic database and the results from the database were compared to various 1665 narratives and pamphlets for the impact of plague on a society. ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………...…………………………………………………………………….1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 PART I. BACKGROUND TO AN EPIDEMIC Understanding the Biology of the Plague…………………...………………………………………………..5 The Plague in 1665 London………...…………………..……………………………………………………8 Review of Literature………………………………………..…………………………………………...….13 PART II. THE STUDY The Big Picture………………………………………………………………….…………………………..19 Relationship to Head of Household…………………………………………………………………………21 The Impact of Other Diseases………………………………………………………….………………… 23 Christenings and Flight…………………………………………………………………...…………………26 PART III.
    [Show full text]
  • To Attract Public Attention. They Have Not Unfrequeutly Excited Public Alarm
    ON THE STUDY OF EPIDEMIC DISEASES: ILLUSTRATED BY THE PESTILENCES OF LONDON. By E. HEADLAM GKEENHOW, M.D. (Bead November 2, 1857.) Visitations of epidemic sickness have, perhaps, rarely failed to attract public attention. They have not unfrequeutly excited public alarm. If, on the one hand, they have often called forth the active practice of some of the noblest virtues of the human character?brotherly love, self-denial, charity and courage, they have, alas ! too often, on the other hand, been the means of temporarily slackening the bonds of social life, and of letting loose some of the worst and most depraved passions of human nature. The history of epidemic diseases forms one of the most interesting subjects of medical inquiry. The investigation of the causes which produce, and of the laws that govern, epidemic visitations, is one of the most im- portant subjects to which the attention of the physician can be directed. Whilst other diseases are frequently attributable to accident, to personal habits, or to individual constitution, epidemic diseases are evidentty produced by causes of a more extensive kind, which act on mankind in the aggregate. However influenced in their course or their result by the condition of individuals, the liability to their invasion is shared at once by large sections of the community; and if they are to be averted, this can only be effected by measures that are co-extensive with this tendency. The study of epidemic diseases has engaged the attention of many of the ablest members of the medical profession from the days of Hippocrates down to our own time.
    [Show full text]
  • Infant Mortality in London, 1538–1850: a Methodological Study
    Infant mortality in London, 1538–1850: a methodological study Peter Razzell Abstract A review of evidence on infant mortality derived from the London bills of mortality and parish registers indicates that there were major registration problems throughout the whole of the parish register period. One way of addressing these problems is to carry out reconstitution studies of individual London parishes, but there are a number of problems with reconstitution methodology, including the traffic in corpses between parishes both inside and outside of London and the negligence of clergymen in registering both baptisms and burials. In this paper the triangulation of sources has been employed to measure the adequacy of burial registration, including the comparison of data from bills of mortality, parish registers and probate returns, as well as the use of the same-name technique. This research indicates that between 20 and 40 per cent of burials went unregistered in London during the parish register period. Introduction In a recent edition of Local Population Studies, Jeremy Boulton and Leonard Schwarz have carried out a detailed analysis of the reliability of the London’s bills of mortality.1 They have demonstrated that there was a significant amount of ‘traffic in corpses’ between London parishes, and some movement of corpses to parishes outside London. They conclude that the bills ‘remain tolerably accurate in the aggregate’,2 a conclusion similar to that of a number of other scholars who have recently worked with the bills.3 However, there is uncertainty about this conclusion, given the number of reasons for the unreliability of the bills, which may be listed as follows: • The existence of Dissenters and Roman Catholics who both baptised independently and in some instances established their own burial grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Geography of Contention in London, 1755-1835: Sketch of a Research Plan
    THE CHANGING GEOGRAPHY OF CONTENTION IN LONDON, 1755-1835: SKETCH OF A RESEARCH PLAN Charles Tilly and R.A. Schweitzer University of Michigan January 1981 .. CRSO Working Paper No. 225 Copies available through: Center for Research on Social Organization University of Michigan 330 Packard Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 THE CHANGING GEOGRAPHY OF CONTENTION IN LONDON, 1755-1835: SKETCH OF A RESEARCH PLAN Charles Tilly and R.A. Schweitzer University of Michigan January 1981 ; The National Endowment for the Humanities supports the research described in this paper. We are grateful to Raul Onoro, Keith Clarke, Amy Alpert, Mary Parks, Madeleine McCarney and the other GCL Staff members for help in preparing the materials presented in the paper, and to Sheila Wilder and Debby.Snovak for help in producing it. CONTENTS List of Maps ................................. 1 British Popular Conflicts in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries ..... 2 An Approach to Explaining the Changes .................... 4 Urban Structure as an Influence on Contention ................ 11 Connections with Previous Work ........................ 13 The Study of Contentious Gatherings in GreatBritain. 1828-1834 ....... 15 Plan of Work for London. 1755-1835 ....................... 18 Selected Bibliography ...........- ................. 34 Appendices: A . A catalog of Contentious Gatherings in London. 1765. 1766. and 1774 ... 56 B . A catalog of Contentious Gatherings in London. June 1828 ......... 58 C . Sample Contentious Gatherings and Routine Assemblies for. Four. 'Areas . in1828 ................................. 61 D . Major Sources of Evidence ........................ 66 E. Topographical Unit Questionnaire ..................... 70 LIST OF MAPS Map 1 Contentious Gatherings by County in 1828 , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , 22 Map 2 Finance Related Trades: London 1768 (London & Environs), , , , . , . , 23 Map 3 Finance Related Business: London 1768 (Ward Boundaries), , , , , , .
    [Show full text]
  • Parochial Registration and the Bills of Mortality: Case Studies in the Age Structure of Causes of Death in Urban Areas Between 1
    The age structure and meaning of causes of death in English urban areas between 1583 and 1812: a case study approach Abstract This paper assesses the use of Early Modern cause of death and age information stated in urban parish burial registers as a means of obtaining greater precision and broader geographical coverage than is possible from the use of Bills of Mortality alone. The London Bills of Mortality are the main source of English statistics on cause-specific mortality prior to the mid-nineteenth century Medical Officer of Health Reports and Annual or Quarterly Reports of the Registrar General. However, other than for the most clearly identifiable infectious diseases, such as plague, smallpox, measles and whooping cough, much uncertainty surrounds the meaning of cause of death descriptors used in the Bills, and the consistency with which they were applied, both over time and between different administrative units of the metropolis. The annual Bills do not provide age breakdowns until 1728, and even after that date the age structure by cause of death is not given. Beginning with sixteenth century London and the contextual clues given in John Graunt's pioneering work Natural and Political Observations Made Upon the Bills of Mortality, we trace the meaning and age applicability of selected cause of death descriptors. Using data collected from late sixteenth century to early nineteenth century burial registers in London, Leeds, York, Liverpool and Newton Heath near Manchester, we examine the descriptors applied to infants, the section of the population most likely to die, and then focus in particular on three case studies of cause of death descriptors pertaining to rickets, teething and old age.
    [Show full text]
  • The Face of Death: Prints, Personifications and the Great Plague of London
    THE FACE OF DEATH: PRINTS, PERSONIFICATIONS AND THE GREAT PLAGUE OF LONDON by HEATHER DIANE MUCKART B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2001 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Art History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) February 2009 © Heather Diane Muckart, 2009 ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines a mass-produced broadsheet printed during the Great Plague of London (1664-1666), which unites the textual modes of poetry and medical prescription with imagery and statistical tabulation, titled Londons Lord Have Mercy Upon Us. The central woodcut on the broadsheet presents a view of London as a bounded expansion, and relegates the images of death, particularly registered in the personification of Death, to the outskirts of the city. This visual separation of the city from the plague sick (and the plague dead) is most profoundly registered on the border of the broadsheet, which is adorned with momento mori imagery. The ordered presentation of the plague city is likewise established in the mortality tabulations on the sheet. These tabulations, which were culled from the contemporaneous London Bills of Mortality, make visible the extent of the disease in the city, while simultaneously linking the plague to the poor London suburbs. Of particular interest are the representation of faces on the broadsheet – the face of the dead, the face of Death and the face of the city – and how these images relate to the plague orders imposed on the city population by the Corporation of London. These orders sought medically and legally to contain, and spatially to control, the larger social body of London through enacting a kind of erasure upon the identities of the sick and dead.
    [Show full text]
  • BILLS of MORTALITY. by WILLIAM A
    BILLS OF MORTALITY. By WILLIAM A. BREND, M.A., M.B., B.Sc. THE custom of recording births, marriages, and deaths is of very ancient origin. In Genesis v. and xi. are given the births, ages, and deaths of the descendants of Adam to the birth of Noah, and from Noah to the twelve patriarchs. Moses counted the Israelites, and recorded the numbers of each of the tribes. Nehemiah, after the return from the Captivity in Babylon, says: "I found the book of the genealogy of them which came up at the first" (vii. 5). In Rome, a register of deaths (ratio Libitinf£) was kept in the temple of Libitina, the goddess of the dead, and a regulation, ascribed to Servius Tullius, required that for every death a piece of money, known as the lucar Libitinre, should be deposited in the temple. Marcus Aurelius ordained that all free persons should give notice of a birth within thirty days, and a record of these was kept in the temple of Saturn. In medieval times, registers appear to have been kept in France as early as 1308, but not much can be learned about them. In Spain, Cardinal Ximenes in 1497 ordered registers to be kept in every parish, in order to terminate the disorders arising from the marriage of persons between whom there was spiritual affinity. Parish registers in England were first instituted by Thomas Cromwell in 1538. In the churchwardens' accounts of the parish of St. Margaret's, Westminster, for that year is the following item: "Paid for a Book to registre in the names of buryals weddings and Christenings 2d." Local registers had, however, been kept by various churches and religious houses long before this date.
    [Show full text]
  • Accidents and Response: Sudden Violent Death in the Early Modern City, 1650–1750
    Accidents and response: sudden violent death in the early modern city, 1650–1750 Craig G. Spence Royal Holloway College University of London PhD 2013 DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP I Craig G. Spence hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. SIGNED : ___ Craig Spence ____ DATE :_____31 SEPTEMBER 2013_________ 2 ABSTRACT Between 1654 and 1735 as many as 15,529 Londoners suffered sudden violent deaths. This figure includes 3,135 who were murdered or committed suicide, however the majority of the fatalities (12,394) resulted from unexplained violent deaths or accidents. Accidents were therefore a regular feature of urban life during the early modern period. This study reviews the occurrence and circumstances of accidental death as recorded in the weekly London Bills of Mortality , parish burial registers and other related documents. It is clear that the most frequently occurring form of accidental death during this period was drowning, followed closely by fatal falls and incidents involving animals and vehicles. A wide range of other violent agencies resulted in sudden death, though in lesser numbers, including stabbing and shooting, fires and explosions, scalding and suffocation. Such fatalities were considered by contemporaries as disorderly deaths and as such a variety of actions were taken to counteract the disturbing effect such events might have. The formal mechanism of the coroner’s inquest, supported by London’s ‘searchers’, was paramount in explaining the how of such deaths whilst religious and intellectual endeavours were occasionally directed at the why .
    [Show full text]