Literature, 1898–1936 K
LITERATURE, 1898–1936 K. M. Sibbald, McGill University This survey covers the years 2010 and 2011 1. General, Literary and Cultural History After some intense critical activity in recent years, there is a certain lull in production. Rather than hurrying into print yet another memoir for immediate consumption, there is evidence of deeper reflection driven by inventive eclecticism rather than circumstantial interest, and this welcome multifariousness is examined in what follows. Joan Brown, Confronting Our Canons. Spanish and Latin American Studies in the 21st Century, Lewisburg, Bucknell U.P., 2010, 247 pp., asserts the need to define a literary canon for Hispanic Studies and frames her argument within primarily US data and an instructive blend of quantitive analysis and qualitative interpretation that points to unfortunate gaps with regard to gender, geography, politics, and linguistic research, ending with a call for a flexible, core-based canon. Doing a sterling job at presenting a rather different version from that usually given, Christine Arkinstall, Histories, Culture, and National Identity: Women Writing Spain, 1877–1984, Lewisburg U.P., 2009, 250 pp., examines literary contributions by women authors to the Liberal project in the 20th c., analysing in separate sections Rosario de Acuña’s plays, Amor a la patria, Tribunales de venganza, and El Padre Juan within the Liberal debate proper, Ángela Figueroa’s poetic anthologies Belleza cruel and Toco la tierra: Letanías to exemplify how she subverted the official discourse by imbuing Catholic iconography with new meanings designed to expose the cruelty of the Civil War and the ensuing dictatorship, and using current theories on culture, memory, and trauma to explore how Rosa Chacel’s novels Barrio de maravillas and Acrópolis propose education and social commitment to ensure a democratic Spain for a new generation; while the same author in ‘Making Free-thinking Spain: The Sociopolitical Poetics of Belén de Sárraga (c.
[Show full text]