EARLY TENNESSEE LAND RECORDS, 1773-1922 Records of the Land Office, State of Tennessee. Records of the Board of Land Commissione

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EARLY TENNESSEE LAND RECORDS, 1773-1922 Records of the Land Office, State of Tennessee. Records of the Board of Land Commissione State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 EARLY TENNESSEE LAND RECORDS, 1773-1922 Records of the Land Office, State of Tennessee. Records of the Board of Land Commissioners RECORD GROUP 50 Processed by: Ann Evans Alley, David R. Sowell Archival Technical Services Location: Eighth Stack, TSLA 1 Date completed: 4 October 2016 1 Certain series of this collection have been previously microfilmed. BACKGROUND It is impossible to overstate the importance of public lands to early Tennessee. Land was without question the most important form of business and entrepreneurial activity in early Tennessee and the chief inducement to immigrate to this country. Tennessee was a public land territory and state, which meant that virtually all of its land passed from various jurisdictions to private owners through means of grants of one sort or another. In the general absence of “hard money” or specie in early Tennessee, land was main type of property, the currency of wealth, and the chief means of making money. Politics and land speculation were closely intertwined, and land issues were a leading concern of early government. The Early Tennessee Land Records, Record Group 50 provides a unique and valuable window into the interactions between settlers, citizens, speculators, and the public land system. MILITARY RESERVATION Lacking funds to pay her officers and men for service in the Continental Line, North Carolina in 1782 passed legislation granting to each soldier then in service who served to the end of the war land in her western district (now the State of Tennessee). Provision was also made for those men who, because of wounds or “bodily infirmities,” were deemed unfit for service. The heirs of a soldier killed in the service of his country were to have the same quantity of land that the soldier would have been entitled to had he served during the war. Determined by rank, the amount of land given ranged from 640 acres for a private to 12,000 acres for a brigadier. General Nathaniel Greene was given a special allotment of 25,000 acres. Three commissioners were appointed to lay off the Military Reservation: Absalom Tatom, Isaac Shelby, and Anthony Bledsoe. They were accompanied by one or more agents to assist them, no more than three surveyors, as well as chain carriers, markers and hunters, who were to supply provisions for the group. A battalion under the command of Major Thomas Evans was sent along for protection. To claim a military grant, proof of service was presented to the Secretary of State of North Carolina. This could be from a muster roll or a certification of service from a commanding officer. (According to the North Carolina Archives, they do not have any of the certifications). However, following the exposure of the Glasgow land frauds the only proof accepted was a muster roll. The Secretary of State of North Carolina issued a surveyor’s warrant to Martin Armstrong (and later to William Christmas), surveyor of the military lands, authorizing him to survey the stated number of acres at a spot designated by the grantee. After the Cession Act in 1789 military grants could be laid on any vacant land, even west of the Tennessee River, if sufficient tillable land could not be found in the Military Reservation. The name of the recipient, the amount of land, and place where the survey was to be made was noted in a book called an entry book. The original copy of Martin Armstrong’s entry book is in the North Carolina Archives. The copy in these records was made by John Overton in preparation of Tennessee’s being able to issue grants. 2 When the survey was made the surveyor returned the surveyor’s warrant (sometimes called warrant of survey) and two copies of the survey with plat to the Secretary of State’s office. The secretary made out the grant, which was then signed by the governor and countersigned by the secretary. One copy of the survey and plat was attached to the grant and returned to the grantee. The warrant and the second copy of the survey were filed in the land office in North Carolina. These documents, including any related documents, can be found on TSLA Microfilm No. 1177. They are arranged by county or district where the land is located. Each of the commissioners who laid off the Military Reservation received 5,000 acres for his service. Those who accompanied the commissioners were also allotted land in the Military Reservation. Surveyors received 250 acres, while the chain carriers, markers, and hunters got 640 acres each. Privates in the guard received 320 acres each, and the officers were paid in land in proportion to their militia pay. The land for the commissioners and those accompanying them was to be entered with the Entry Taker of Davidson County (Samuel Barton) rather than the Secretary of State, as were the military grants. From this point the grant process continued in the same manner as the military grants. PREEMPTION GRANTS Finding that prior to the passage of the act for the benefit of her Continental soldiers, many families had settled within the bounds of the land set aside as the Military Reservation, North Carolina granted a preemption of 640 acres to each family or head of family and to every single man 21 years or over who was settled on the land before June 1, 1780. As the commissioners identified those early Cumberland settlers, they issued a certificate to those entitled to a preemption and entered the names of the person and a description of the land in a book kept for that purpose. The book was returned to the North Carolina General Assembly. By the time the commissioners arrived many of the original settlers had moved on and assigned their right of preemption to another. In many cases the right had been passed through several owners. The original book is in the North Carolina Archives. It has also been published (Irene Griffey, The Preemptors). JOHN ARMSTRONG GRANTS In order to redeem from her citizens specie certificates (i.e. promissory notes) issued during the Revolution for supplies, etc. for her troops (NOT for military service), North Carolina opened a land office in Hillsboro, North Carolina on October 21, 1783. John Armstrong was named Entry Taker. The land was offered at Ten Pounds in specie per hundred acres and included all of present day Tennessee with the exception of the Military District and the land held by the Cherokee Nation in the southeastern corner of the state. Individual tracts were limited to 5,000 acres, but a loophole made it possible to join these into larger tracts. The state was divided into three sections. The Eastern District was composed of land between Greene County and the Cumberland Mountains. The Middle District covered the land between the Cumberland Mountains and the Tennessee River, while the Western District extended from 3 the Tennessee River to the Mississippi River, even though this land was still claimed by the Chickasaw Nation and title would not be cleared until 1819. As North Carolina did not recognize the claim of the Chickasaws, many grants were laid in this area, including those surveyed in 1785 by Henry Rutherford and John Rice’s claim to the land at present day Memphis. A chief surveyor was appointed for each district: Stockley Donelson, son of John Donelson for the Eastern District, William Polk for the Middle District and William T. Lewis for the Western District. In order to obtain a grant, the claimant took to John Armstrong’s office a written description of the land he wished to claim. The entry taker endorsed the entry (sometimes referred to as a “location”) with the name of the claimant, number of acres, and date. They were to be recorded in order received. After three months, if there was no previous claim for the same land, the entry taker delivered to the claimant a numbered copy of the entry, with a warrant authorizing a survey. Once the survey was completed, it was returned to the Secretary of State’s office and the grant process continued. The original grants were sent to the claimants twice a year on April 1st and October 1st. The grant had to be recorded within twelve months in the deed books of the county where the land was located. Not interested in land, many of the citizens sold their specie certificates at a discounted price to speculators who rushed to the land office to claim their bargain land. Many claims were entered for land between the Tennessee and Mississippi Rivers only to be lost in 1806 when the United States required Tennessee to relinquish jurisdiction to the area. By 1784 North Carolina was being pressed by the Federal government for payment of her Revolutionary debt. She offered her western lands to the United States in settlement of the debt. In anticipation of the acceptance of the offer, North Carolina closed John Armstrong’s office on May 25, 1784. If accepted, the right to issue warrants and grants from this office would have passed to the United States. The offer was not accepted, but John Armstrong’s office was not reopened Tennessee’s copy of John Armstrong’s Entry Book was made by John Overton in 1804 from the original in the North Carolina Archives. The records from this office generated during the grant process are also included on TSLA Microfilm No. 1177. The Entry Book has been published by Bruce Pruitt, as well as by Irene Griffey.
Recommended publications
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives MURDOCK COLLECTION Of
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 MURDOCK COLLECTION of JOHN OVERTON PAPERS 1780-[1797-1820]-1908 (THS Collection) Processed by: Archival Technical Services Accession Number: THS 4 Date Completed: September 4, 1954 1982 Addition Accession Number: THS 406 Date Completed: July 15, 1983 Microfilm Accession Number: 803 Location: THS I-B-1 and I-C-2 MICROFILMED INTRODUCTION The original part of this collection of Overton papers were inherited by Mrs. J. O. Murdock, of Washington, DC, from her ancestor, John M. Lea, a son-in-law of John Overton and were donated by her to the Tennessee Historical Society. The 1982 addition to the collection was given by Overton L. Murdock, of Bethesda, Maryland. The collection consists of 2.52 linear feet of shelf space and numbers approximately 1,025 items and three volumes. These papers are the property of the Tennessee Historical Society and are available on microfilm at the Joint Universities Library and the Manuscript Division of the Tennessee State Library and Archives. Single photocopies of documents may be made for individual or scholarly purposes. However, for commercial use, or use that may constitute a copy right infringement, the user should obtain permission from the historical society. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE This collection of papers of John Overton, numbering approximately 900 items, are composed of correspondence, two promissory notes, a Masonic document and a small diary of Nashville events listed yearly beginning in 1780, ending in 1851. The correspondence deals primarily with land cases of John Overton as lawyer and judge with some Tennessee politics intermingled.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Counties Named for Patriots & Founding Fathers
    Tennessee Counties named for Patriots & Founding Fathers Photo County amed for Anderson County Joseph Anderson (1757-1837), U.S. Senator from TN, and first Comptroller of the U.S. Treasury. During the Revolutionary War, he was an officer in the New Jersey Line of the Continental Army. Bedford County Revolutionary War Officer Thomas Bedford Bledsoe County Anthony Bledsoe (ca 1795-1793), Revolutionary War Soldier, Surveyer, and early settler of Sumner County. Blount County William Blount (1749-1800) was a delegate to the Constitutional Convention of North Carolina, the first and only Governor of the Southwest Territory, and was appointed as the Regimental Paymaster of the 3rd NC. Regiment during the Revolutionary War. Davidson County William Lee Davidson (1746-1781) a Brigadier General who died in the Revolutionary War Battle of Cowan’s Ford. DeKalb County Johann de Kalb (1721-1780) A German-born baron who assisted the Continentals during the Revolutionary War Fayette County Marquis de La Fayette (1757-1834) a French aristocrat and military officer who was a General in the Revolutionary War Franklin County Founding Father Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) Greene County Nathaniel Greene (1742-1786) Major General in the Continental Army During the Revolutionary War. Hamilton County Founding Father Alexander Hamilton (ca.1755- 1804) Hancock County John Hancock (1737-1794) President of the Continental Congress Hawkins County Benjamin Hawkins (1754-1816) was commissioned as a Colonel in the Continental Army where he served under George Washington for several years as his main French interpreter. Henry County Revolutionary-era Patriot Patrick Henry (1736- 1799) Jackson County Revolutionary War Veteran and President Andrew Jackson (1767-1845).
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Blue Book 1995-1996 Bicentennial Edition (1796-1996)
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 TENNESSEE BLUE BOOK 1995-1996 BICENTENNIAL EDITION (1796-1996) SLIDES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF THE HISTORY OF TENNESSEE SECTION (PP. 322-420) RECORD GROUP 238 Processed by: David R. Sowell Archival Technical Services TENNESSEE STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES Date completed: 4/22/1997 INTRODUCTION This collection consists of photograph slides, some of which were used as illustrations in the publication of the History of Tennessee section of the Bicentennial Edition of the Tennessee Blue Book. Most of the images in these slides were from the collections of the Tennessee State Library and Archives, but other institutions furnished materials for this undertaking. These were: Tennessee Photographic Services; the Tennessean and Nashville Banner newspapers; the Vanderbilt University Jean and Alexander Heard Library Special Collections and University Archives; the University of Tennessee- Knoxville, Hoskins Library, Special Collections; the Tennessee State Museum; Fisk University; the Kansas State Historical Society. These slides will be available for reference purposes. Patrons should consult an archivist and the photographer of the Tennessee State Library and Archives on producing copies of any images in this collection. The following container list will serve as a guide to the subject content of this slide collection. Patrons using these photograph slides in published works should procure permission and proper attribution phrasing from the repositories holding these images. CONTAINER LIST SLIDE NUMBER (ORIGINAL) SUBJECT NUMBER (NEW) 1-25 Iron Works at Chattanooga (engraving). (Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, No. XCIX, Aug. 1858, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cumberland Settlement
    The Cumberland Settlement Essential Question: Why was the Cumberland Settlement created and what problems did the early settlers encounter? In 1775, Richard Henderson purchased 20 million acres of land from the Cherokee in a land deal known as the Transylvania Purchase. The lands lay in what is now middle Tennessee and Kentucky. While Henderson was not able to convince Virginia and North Carolina to recognize his entire claim, he was able to claim the region near the Cumberland River in Middle Tennessee. In 1779, Henderson planned a settlement in order to take advantage of the region’s rich natural resources including fertile soil and abundant animal life. Henderson’s settlement was named the Cumberland Settlement for the Cumberland River which served as main transportation route in the region. Henderson gave the difficult task of establishing the settlement to James Robertson and John Donelson. Donelson was an experienced land surveyor and veteran of the Cherokee War. James Robertson was one of first Watauga settlers and had served as one of the five magistrates established under the Watauga Compact. Robertson had also served as commander of Watuaga Fort during the Cherokee War. Henderson had a two part plan for settling the Cumberland region. First, Robertson and a small group of Wataugans traveled overland in the spring of 1779 to select a site for the settlement near French Lick. French Lick was a natural salt lick along the Cumberland River that had been the location of a French trading post. In December of 1779, Robertson and the men returned and built cabins and Fort Nashborough in preparation for the arrival of Donelson’s party in the spring of 1780.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortuary and Material Culture Patterning at the Donelson Slave Cemetery (40Dv106), Davidson County, Tennessee
    “YEA, THOUGH I WALK THROUGH THE VALLEY OF THE SHADOW OF DEATH;” MORTUARY AND MATERIAL CULTURE PATTERNING AT THE DONELSON SLAVE CEMETERY (40DV106), DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE by Dan Sumner Allen IV A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History Middle Tennessee State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Dr. C. Van West, Chair Dr. Mary S. Hoffschwelle Dr. James Beeby ABSTRACT “YEA, THOUGH I WALK THROUGH THE VALLEY OF THE SHADOW OF DEATH;” MORTUARY AND MATERIAL CULTURE PATTERNING AT THE DONELSON SLAVE CEMETERY (40DV106), DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE By Dan Sumner Allen IV The Hermitage Springs Site (40DV551) was a prehistoric aboriginal aggregation site discovered in 2001 during grading for residential development in northeastern Davidson County, Tennessee. From 2004 to 2006, archaeologists relocated more than 300 prehistoric burials as well as over 400 non-mortuary features from the site. In addition to prehistoric archaeological deposits, archaeologists excavated sixty historic burials thought to be associated with a community of slaves from the western edge of the site. This thesis presents historic archaeological research on those historic African- American burials, perhaps one of the earliest, excavated slave cemeteries in the Cumberland Region. By developing an environmental and historical context for the cemetery, combined with an analysis of its mortuary and material culture patterns, the author identified general patterns and date ranges for the burials, thus shedding new light on burial practices afforded marginalized slave populations in late eighteenth and early nineteenth century Tennessee. The author compared the archaeological data to other professional excavation projects in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley History
    OHIO VALLEY HISTORY A Collaboration of The Filson Historical Society, Cincinnati Museum Center, and the University of Cincinnati. VOLUME 5 • NUMBER 4 • WINTER 2005 OHIO VALLEY EDITORIAL BOARD HISTORY STAFF Compton Allyn Christine L. Heyrman Joseph P. Reidy Editors Cincinnati Museum Center University of Delaware Howard University History Advisory Board Christopher Phillips J. Blaine Hudson Steven J. Ross David Stradling Stephen Aron University of Louisville University of Southern Department of History University of California California University of Cincinnati at Los Angeles R. Douglas Hurt Purdue University Harry N. Scheiber Joan E. Cashin University of California Managing Editors James C. Klotter Ohio State University at Berkeley John B. Westerfield II Georgetown College The Filson Historical Society Andrew R. L. Cayton Steven M. Stowe Bruce Levine Miami University Indiana University Ruby Rogers University of California Cincinnati Museum Center R. David Edmunds at Santa Cruz Roger D. Tate University of Texas at Dallas Somerset Community Zane L. Miller Editorial Assistant College Cathy Collopy Ellen T. Eslinger University of Cincinnati Department of History DePaul University Joe W. Trotter, Jr. Elizabeth A. Perkins University of Cincinnati Carnegie Mellon University Craig T. Friend Centre College North Carolina State Altina Waller James A. Ramage University University of Connecticut Northern Kentucky University CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER THE FILSON HISTORICAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES SOCIETY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chair David Bohl Steven R. Love President George H. Vincent Ronald D. Brown Kenneth W. Love R. Ted Steinbock Past Chair Otto M. Budig, Jr. Craig Maier Vice-President H.C. Buck Niehoff Brian Carley Jeffrey B. Matthews, M.D. Ronald R. Van Stockum, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Jackson Collection, 1788-1942
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 ANDREW JACKSON COLLECTION, 1788-1942 Accession numbers: 3, 37, 38, 41, 297, 574, 582, 624, 640, 646, 691, 692, 845, 861, 968, 971, 995, 1103, 1125, 1126, 1128, 1170 1243, 1301, 1392, 69-160, and 78-048 Processed by Harriet C. Owsley and Linda J. Drake Date completed: June 1, 1959 Revised: 1964 Microfilm Accession Number: Mf. 809 Location: VI-A-4-6 The collected papers of and materials about Andrew Jackson (1767-1845), Judge Advocate of Davidson County, Tennessee, Militia Regiment, 1791; member of Congress, 1796-1798, 1823- 1824; Major General, United States Army, 1814; Governor of Florida Territory, 1821; and President of the United States, 1828-1836, were collected by Mr. And Mrs. John Trotwood Moore on behalf of the Tennessee State Library and Archives during their respective terms as State Librarian and Archivist. The documents were acquired from various sources. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 6.0 Approximate number of items: 1.500 Single photocopies of unpublished writings may be made for purposes of scholarly research. Microfilm Container List Reel 1: Box 1 to Box 3, Folder 13 Reel 2: Box 3, Folder 13 to Box 6, Folder 2 Reel 3: Box 6, Folder 3 to Box 9 On Reel 3 of the microfilm, targets labeled box 5 should be labeled Box 6. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The Andrew Jackson Papers, approximately 1,500 items (originals, photostats, and Xerox copies) dating from 1788 to 1942, are composed of correspondence: legal documents; clippings; documents about the Dickinson duel; articles about Andrew Jackson; biographical data concerning Andrew Jackson; biographical data concerning Ralph Earl (portrait painter); John H.
    [Show full text]
  • 02. Past Constitutional Officers.Indd
    506 TENNESSEE BLUE BOOK Historical Listings of Constitutional Officers In this section an attempt has been made to present as accurate a record as pos- sible of the persons who have filled constitutional offices in Tennessee. In some cases, however, it has not been possible to obtain a complete list. Governors Year of State of Year of Date Name Birth Birth Death Inaugurated Occupation Politics * William Blount 1749 NC 1800 Sept. 20, 1790 Soldier D John Sevier 1745 VA 1815 March 30, 1796 Soldier, pioneer D Archibald Roane 1759 PA 1819 Sept. 23, 1801 Lawyer D John Sevier 1745 VA 1815 Sept. 23, 1803 Soldier, pioneer D Willie Blount 1768 NC 1835 Sept. 20, 1809 Lawyer, planter D Joseph McMinn 1758 PA 1824 Sept. 27, 1815 Merchant D William Carroll 1788 PA 1844 Oct. 1, 1821 Merchant, soldier D Sam Houston 1793 VA 1863 Oct. 1, 1827 Lawyer D William Hall 1775 NC 1856 April 16, 1829 Planter, soldier D William Carroll 1788 PA 1844 Oct. 1, 1829 Merchant, soldier D Newton Cannon 1781 NC 1841 Oct. 12, 1835 Planter W James K. Polk 1795 NC 1849 Oct. 14, 1839 Lawyer D James C. Jones 1809 TN 1859 Oct. 15, 1841 Lawyer W Aaron V. Brown 1795 VA 1859 Oct. 14, 1845 Lawyer D Neill S. Brown 1810 TN 1886 Oct. 17, 1847 Lawyer W William Trousdale 1790 NC 1872 Oct. 16, 1849 Lawyer D William B. Campbell 1807 TN 1867 Oct. 16, 1851 Lawyer W Andrew Johnson 1808 NC 1875 Oct. 17, 1853 Tailor, President D Isham G. Harris 1818 TN 1897 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1958 The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee Robert Audubon Ladd University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Educational Administration and Supervision Commons Recommended Citation Ladd, Robert Audubon, "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1958. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3077 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Robert Audubon Ladd entitled "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Educational Administration. Orin B. Graff, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: ARRAY(0x7f6fff323d18) Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) July 31, 1958 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a the-sis written by Robert Audubon Ladd entitled "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee." I recommend that it be accepted for nine quarter hours of credit in partial fulfillment of the rewl.irements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Educational Aillninistration and Supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate Legislative Manual
    TENNESSEE SENATE 106TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATIVE MANUAL RON RAMSEY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AND SPEAKER OF THE SENATE Published by: The Office of the Chief Clerk Tennessee State Senate Russell Humphrey, Chief Clerk TABLE OF CONTENTS THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 3 The Lieutenant Governor ............................................................................... 4 Members of the Senate ................................................................................... 5 General Schedule ...........................................................................................15 Senate District Map .......................................................................................16 Senate Seating Chart......................................................................................17 Officers of the Senate.....................................................................................18 Sergeants-At-Arms........................................................................................19 Members of the House of Representatives.....................................................20 House District Map .......................................................................................24 House Seating Chart......................................................................................26 Senate Standing & Select Committees ..........................................................27 House Standing & Select Committees ..........................................................28 Joint Committees ...........................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of John Long of Grainger County, TN
    Descendants of John Long Generation No. 1 3 2 1 1. JOHN LONG (JOSEPH , LONG ) was born 1735 in Ireland/Scotland, and died 1818 in Grainger, TN. He married JANE YOUNG Abt. 1763 in Staunton, Augusta County, Virginia, daughter of ROBERT YOUNG and MARY DOUGLASS. She was born Abt. 1738 in Ireland, and died Bef. 1818 in Grainger County, Tennessee. Notes for JOHN LONG: Page 715.--4th November, 1764. Samuel Long to John Long, £100, 15 acres on Buffalo Creek of James River. Teste: Wm. Davis, James Young, Edward Fan's. NOVEMBER, 1766 (A). Long vs. Hutchison.--John Hutchison, debtor, 1766, to schooling your children, £1, 12, 9. (Signed) John Long. NOVEMBER, 1766 (A). John Long vs. John Hutcheson.--1766, To ORDER BOOK No. X MARCH 23, 1767. (514) John Long, returned not found in bailiwick. Bail"i*wick\, n. [Bailie, bailiff + wick a village.] (Law) The precincts within which a bailiff has jurisdiction; the limits of a bailiff's authority. SEPTEMBER 20, 1786. (170) Rachel, wife of John Alexander, relinquished dower in land conveyed by her husband, John and James Alexander, to John Long. Page 244.--List of book debts due Thomas Stuart--By ; John Caldwell (son Samuel); Robt. Campbell (son to widow); William Campbell (Sander's son); Robt. Campbell (Smith); Samuel Hays (blacksmith); Joseph Long (Forks); Edward Long (taylor); John Montgomery (wagonmaker); Alex. Montgomery (son to John); John Thompson (wheelwright); Jno. Long (Holston). John Long, born in Londonderry, Ireland of Scottish parents, migrated to America and settled in Rockingham Co., VA during the years 1753-1754. JOHN LONG--------and---------TENNESSEE SKETCH OF A PIONEER and HIS PROGENY By His Great-Great-Granddaughter Caroline Grantland Candler Branan John Long emigrated to America from the north of Ireland about the year 1753 or 1754, and settled in Rockingham county, Virginia (at the time, Augusta County), near Staunton.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives GOVERNOR JOSEPH Mcminn
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 GOVERNOR JOSEPH McMINN PAPERS 1815-1821 (GP 6) Processed by: Elbert Watson Archival Technical Services Re-Processed by: David R. Sowell Archival Technical Services Date Completed: 1964; 1988 MICROFILMED SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The McMinn administrations were marked with some small attention to the matters leading up to Indian removal, the extinction of treaties with the contiguous tribes, and the formulation of new treaties to take into account increases in the White population. An interesting but minor piece of correspondence is that between Governor McMinn and certain parties relative to the delivery of presentation swords to Major Generals Andrew Jackson and Edmund Pendleton Gaines, in recognition of distinguished service during the War of 1812. The services of General Gaines had been conspicuous in the campaigns of the Northwest, where the military achievements of American forces had been less than creditable. Some concern was also reflected at the entrance from neighboring states of an inordinate number of “free persons of color”, apparently drawn by the attractive social climate which the State was quick to attempt to erase. There seems to have been more that the usual number of jail-breaks, which may have been one of the reasons why the Governor initiated measures for the provision of a state penitentiary. Crime and punishment became more sophisticated. There was one of two cases of fraud, contempt of court, etc. on the one hand; and on the other, there was a tendency to reduce the amount of corporal punishment, as well as to ameliorate the severity of chargeable crimes and their punishment.
    [Show full text]