DOCSLIB.ORG

Independent Police Complaints Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Independent Police Complaints Commission House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Independent Police Complaints Commission Eleventh Report of Session 2012–13 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 10 July, 18 September, 23 October, 6 and 20 November, and 4 and 11 December 2012, and 8 and 29 January 2013 Published on 4 February 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abingdon) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Michael Ellis MP (Conservative, Northampton North) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Karl Turner MP (Labour, Kingston upon Hull East) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Member was also a member of the Committee during the Parliament. Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Tom Healey (Clerk), Richard Benwell (Second Clerk), Ruth Davis (Committee Specialist), Eleanor Scarnell (Committee Specialist), Andy Boyd (Senior Committee Assistant), Michelle Garratty (Committee Assistant), Iwona Hankin (Committee Support Officer) and Alex Paterson (Select Committee Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Home Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 3276; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] List of additional written evidence Page 1 G4S Ev w1 2 Dr Rodger Patrick Ev w1 3 Women Against Rape Ev w7 4 E C Lucy Ev w8 5 Campaign4Justice Ev w8 6 Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) Ev w13 7 Newham Monitoring Project Ev w14 8 Taherali Gulamhussein Ev w19 9 StopWatch Ev w20 10 Charles Kirk Ev w23 11 Sara Jane Loughran Ev w25 12 Celia Jeune Ev w29 13 Tony Wise Ev w30, Ev w33 14 Donna M Gardner Ev w38 15 David Mery Ev w43 16 Denise Hart Ev w44 17 Dr Rita Pal Ev w47 18 Family of Sharon McLaughlin Ev w47 19 Anton Venter Ev w51 20 National Policing Improvement Agency Ev w53 21 Liam Silcocks Ev w54 22 Keith Cornwall Ev w55 23 Satish Sekar Ev w57 24 Neil Coggins Ev w63 25 JusticeNow Ev w66 26 Richard Wildblood Ev w67 27 Ian Puddick Ev w68 28 Natasha Sivanandan Ev w68 29 Patrick Allfrey Ev w73 30 Patricia F Gallan Ev w75 31 Sir Jeremy Heywood Ev w76 cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [SO] Processed: [01-02-2013 12:48] Job: 025757 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/025757/025757_w032_michelle_IPCC 40 - Jeremy Heywood.xml Home Affairs Committee: Evidence Ev w1 Written evidence Written evidence submitted by G4S [IPCC 01] I am writing to you in relation to the Committee’s inquiry into the IPCC as G4S shares your view that the IPCC plays a vital role in ensuring fair play in policing and improve public confidence. We believe this is essential to uphold and improve confidence of the public accountability in policing. Private providers have supported police forces across the UK for over 20 years. G4S, for example, currently provides custody services and transport solutions in Lancashire, South Wales, Staffordshire and Lincolnshire forces, freeing up warranted police officers to focus on core policing tasks. To ensure that members of the public can expect the same, if not better, service, when a G4S colleague supports the police in their case, G4S informed the IPCC back in 2010 that our employees would be subject to the same scrutiny and sanctions from the IPCC applied to civilian police staff. In addition, and in the absence of statutory regulation, we have contractually included IPCC co-operation and compliance into our strategic partnership contract with Lincolnshire Police. However, as it currently stands other private providers are not required to follow our lead. G4S therefore supports the IPCC’s call for the power to investigate all civilian staff who support police duties in order to preserve public confidence in the service. Also, IPCC Statutory Guidance on the Handling of Complaints expressly excludes private sector Custody Detention Officers as the Secretary of State has not made regulation for the creation of a separate complaints system for such designated staff. However, we believe that private providers working with the police should follow our example, ensuring there Is no difference in the handling of complaints against civilian in-house police staff or staff working for private providers and fully cooperate with the relevant investigating organisation, whether it is the Police Professional Standards Department or the IPCC. This means there is currently no statutory requirement for contracted staff to co-operate with any investigation being conducted by the police or IPCC other than when asked to assist in a criminal investigation. This should be changed. John Shaw Managing Director G4S Policing Support Services June 2012 Written evidence submitted by Dr Rodger Patrick [IPCC 03] Executive Summary The research into the impact of Performance Management on the Police Service indicated that “gaming” behaviours ie “cooking the books” or “fiddling the figures” was negating the potential benefits of the reform programme. The findings based on analysis of the performance data and official documents, some obtained under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, suggested the phenomenon was organisational in nature. It was also evident that the malpractice was managerially driven in a “top down” fashion and had spread as a result of ineffective regulation and governance. Establishing the evidence for this assertion involved the examination of a number of investigations carried out by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) into incidents involving “gaming” type behaviours. It was clear from the review of these investigations that the IPCC were unable or unwilling to identify and address the organisational deficiencies’ or hold Chief Officers responsible for the outcomes. 1. Categories of Police“Gaming”Practices 1.1 This report is structured around the four distinct types of “gaming” behaviours identified during the research. Taken in their totality they constitute what can be referred to as the “perverse policing model”. The involvement of the IPCC will be itemised under each “gaming” category defined as follows: — Cuffing: The under-recording of reported crimes, the term being derived from the magician’s art of making objects disappear up the sleeve or cuff (Young 1991). — Nodding: This involves collusion between officers and suspects to confess to large numbers of offences, usually whilst in prison after sentence, in return for favours such as reduced sentences, access to partners, drugs or alcohol. The term is used to describe the act of a prisoner pointing out or “nodding” at locations where they claim to have committed offences. (Wilson et al 2001:63). — Skewing: This involves moving resources from areas of activity which are not subject to performance measures in order to improve performance in areas that are monitored for control purposes (Rogerson 1995). cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [E] Processed: [01-02-2013 12:48] Job: 025757 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/025757/025757_w032_michelle_IPCC 40 - Jeremy Heywood.xml Ev w2 Home Affairs Committee: Evidence — Stitching: This includes a variety of malpractices designed to enhance the strength of evidence against a suspect in order to ensure the desired criminal justice outcome. Fabricating evidence or stitching someone up are forms of this behaviour. 2. Methodology 2.1 Examination of the trend data “before and after” known events or scandals involving “cuffing”; “nodding”; or “stitching” enabled consistent patterns to be established. This also provided an estimate of the scale of the problem and in turn could be used to identify the likely presence of the various “gaming” behaviours. The distorting effect of these three “gaming” practices made it difficult to use this method to quantify “skewing” and geographically mapping the deployment of police officers over time was one method used to overcome this obstacle. The other was the examination of IPCC reports into the investigation of serious cases, usually homicides, where police involvement was believed to be inadequate. In order to overcome researcher bias the findings and documents were commented upon by a group of retired officers with specialist experience of the areas of policing under study. 3.“Cuffing” 3.1 This form of “gaming” behaviour is relatively well documented in both the academic and practitioner literature. Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary provided a detailed account in their thematic report on police integrity (HMIC 1999), so the IPCC should be alert to its presence and symptoms. 3.2 It may also be of interest to the committee to note that during the research the correlation between “cuffing” and complaints against the police was explored. However it appeared at least one large force was categorising some complaints as “quality of service issues” thus negating this approach. This in itself is a form of “cuffing” and the equivalent of the alternative crime registers uncovered in the West Midlands Police by HMIC (1999).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hacking Affair Is Not Over – but What Would a Second Leveson Inquiry Achieve?
    7/10/2019 Hacking affair is not over – but what would a second Leveson inquiry achieve? Academic rigour, journalistic flair Hacking affair is not over – but what would a second Leveson inquiry achieve? July 25, 2014 3.57pm BST Author John Jewell Director of Undergraduate Studies, School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University On we go. Ian Nicholson/PA In the latest episode in the long-running saga that is the phone hacking affair, Dan Evans, a former journalist at the News of the World and Sunday Mirror, has received a 10 month suspended sentence after being convicted of two counts of phone hacking, one of making illegal payments to officials, and one of perverting the course of justice. Coming so soon after the conviction of Andy Coulson and the acquittal of Rebekah Brooks and others, one could be forgiven for assuming that the whole phone hacking business is now done and dusted. Not a bit of it. As Julian Petley has written: “Eleven more trials are due to take place involving 20 current or former Sun and News of the World journalists, who are accused variously of making illegal payments to public officials, conspiring to intercept voicemail and accessing data on stolen mobile phones.” We also learned in June that Scotland Yard had officially told Rupert Murdoch of their intention to interview him as part of their inquiry into allegations of crime at his British newspapers. The Guardian revealed that Murdoch was first contacted in 2013, but the police ceded to his lawyers’ request that any interrogation should wait until the Coulson–Brooks trial had finished.
    [Show full text]
  • Unauthorised Tapping Into Or Hacking of Mobile Communications
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 1. This report is strictly embargoed and is not for broadcast or publication, in any form, before 05.00hrs, Wednesday 20 July 2011. 2. This report is issued under the condition that it should not be forwarded or copied to anyone else. 3. Under no circumstances should you distribute copies to anyone else or speak to the media before the publication time about the content of this report. 4. The report is subject to parliamentary copyright and you are not permitted to distribute, replicate, or publish further copies either in hard copy or on the internet either before or after publication. 5. If these instructions are unclear in any way please contact Alex Paterson on 020 7219 1589 or email [email protected] HC 907 Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications 3 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 July 2011 HC 907 Published on 20 July 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West
    [Show full text]
  • Aftermath of the Anti-Terrorism Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006
    Scrutiny by the Metropolitan Police Authority of communication and media at the Metropolitan Police Service with particular reference to the handling of media and communications during the Forest Gate incident of June 2006 Aftermath of the Anti-Terrorism Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006 Submission of Newham Monitoring Project 27 September 2006 Aftermath of the Police Raids in Forest Gate on 2 June 2006 1. Terms of Reference 1.1. On Friday 2 June, 2006 police carried out raids on 46 and 48 Lansdown Road, Forest Gate, London. In the weeks following these raids the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) amended its existing scrutiny programme of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) for 2006/7 to include the media and communications strategy of the MPS. 1.2. The stated objectives of this amendment to the MPA’s scrutiny programme is to : a) Assess the extent to which the MPS has the strategies, policies, protocols and processes in place to ensure efficient and effective communication, media and reputation management, particularly in the context of the 24 hour news environment. b) Undertake a detailed analysis of the handling of the media and communication during the Forest Gate incident in June 2006. c) Assess how effectively the MPS engages internally to manage communication to the media, Londoners and stakeholders, particularly during sensitive operations. d) Understand the culture of the MPS towards communication and media management and the impact this has on the delivery of an effective service. e) Evaluate the use of resources available to the MPS to deliver this key function, including understanding the division of resources and lines of accountability between central and local directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Into the London Terrorist Attacks on 7 July 2005
    ISC Annual Report_prelims 9/5/06 11:06 am Page TPi Intelligence and Security Committee Report into the London Terrorist Attacks on 7 July 2005 Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Paul Murphy, MP Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty MAY 2006 Cm 6785 £10.50 ISC Annual Report_prelims 8/5/06 11:50 pm Page ii © Crown Copyright 2006 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2–16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] ISC Annual Report_prelims 8/5/06 11:50 pm Page iii From: The Chairman, The Rt. Hon. Paul Murphy, MP INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE 70 Whitehall London SW1A 2AS ISC 105/2006 30 March 2006 Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, MP Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA On 7 July 2006 fifty-two people were killed in the terrorist attacks in London. The Intelligence and Security Committee has examined the intelligence and security matters relevant to the attacks and I enclose with this letter a Report which covers our findings. Investigations into the 7 and 21 July events continue, and therefore some information remains sub judice.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Valley Branch December Event
    Thames Valley Branch December event ‘By Royal Appointment’ – insights on protecting the Royal Family 09 December 2016 Phyllis Court, Marlow Road, Henley on Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 2HT 19.00–23.00 www.iosh.co.uk/thamesvalleybranch Thames Valley Branch December event 09 December 2016 Phyllis Court, Marlow Road, Henley on Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 2HT 19.00–23.00 IOSH Thames Valley Branch is delighted Booking is essential to invite you to its December event. Members may bring guests and enjoy an opportunity to socialise and network. Come and enjoy a festive social evening in a sumptuous setting. Our guest speaker, Andy Hayman, will share anecdotes IOSH members and one guest – £17 per person and give some fascinating insights from his experiences of Additional guests – £34 per person working to ensure the safety of the Royal Family. Let us know of any special dietary requirements when Guest speaker Andy Hayman CBE, QPM you book. Please book and pay at Thames Valley Branch Andy is an experienced public speaker and raconteur. meetings, using the attached booking form or by post. At the Dinner, he will bring to life the responsibility he had Please post (cheques only, please) to David Heath, for Royal Protection. Formerly, he was Chief Constable 1 Havelock Crescent, Maidenhead SL6 5BL. of Norfolk Constabulary and Assistant Commissioner for Specialist Operations at the Metropolitan Police. He was the If you have any queries or need any more information, highest-ranking officer for counter-terrorism in the UK, and please email [email protected] was directly responsible for the investigation into the July or visit www.iosh.co.uk/thamesvalleybranch.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the 7 July Review Committee
    cover2.qxd 5/26/06 3:41 pm Page 1 Report of the 7 July Review Committee - Volume 2 Volume - Committee Report of the 7 July Review Report of the 7 July Review Committee Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Enquiries 020 7983 4100 June 2006 Minicom 020 7983 4458 LA/May 06/SD D&P Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Contents Page Transcript of hearing on 3 November 2005 3 Transport for London, Metropolitan Police Service, City of London Police, British Transport Police, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service Transcript of hearing on 1 December 2005 Telecommunications companies: BT, O2, Vodafone, Cable & Wireless 61 Communication with businesses: London Chamber of Commerce & Industry 90 and Metropolitan Police Service Transcript of hearing on 11 January 2006 Local authorities: Croydon Council (Local Authority Gold on 7 July), Camden 109 Council, Tower Hamlets Council and Westminster City Council Health Service: NHS London, Barts & the London NHS Trust, Great Ormond 122 Street Hospital, Royal London Hospital and Royal College of Nursing Media: Sky News, BBC News, BBC London, ITV News, LBC News & Heart 132 106.2, Capital Radio and London Media Emergency Forum, Evening Standard, The Times Transcript of hearing on 1 March 2006 147 Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London Sir Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Written submissions from organisations Metropolitan Police 167 City of London Police 175 London Fire Brigade
    [Show full text]
  • Counter-Terrorism: the London Debate
    DRAFT Counter-Terrorism: The London Debate ‘Counter-Terrorism: The London Debate’, Metropolitan Police Authority, February 2007 1 DRAFT Counter-Terrorism: The London Debate PAGE CONTENTS 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 4 Findings 5 Recommendations 9 Advice 12 Introduction 13 Consultative process 13 Context 13 Definition of terrorism 14 Types of terrorism 14 Terminology of terrorism 15 Reality of terrorism 17 A new normality? 18 Effects of terrorism 19 Fear 20 Hatred 23 The counter-terrorist response 29 Reassurance 30 Trust and confidence 31 Communications 35 Media 38 Community engagement 44 Stop and search 51 Police personnel 54 Intelligence 56 Radicalisation and deradicalisation 60 Community cohesion 62 Preparedness 65 Government 67 Politics 69 Conclusion 70 Annex A: Organisations and groups which participated in ‘Counter- Terrorism: The London Debate’ ‘Counter-Terrorism: The London Debate’, Metropolitan Police Authority, February 2007 2 DRAFT FOREWORD The Metropolitan Police Authority and the Metropolitan Police Service have no higher priority than protecting Londoners and the citizens of the United Kingdom against terrorist attack. Governments, police and security services alone cannot turn a city or a country into a place where terrorism cannot survive. If we are to make London the safest major city in the world, we must mobilise against terrorism not only the resources of the state, but also the active support of the millions of people who live and work in the capital. Only together can we hope to prevent a repetition of what happened here in London on 7 July 2005, or worse. The Metropolitan Police Authority, in recognising the role Londoners have to play in countering the terrorist threat, has consulted over 1,000 London residents and workers through its programme, ‘Counter-Terrorism: The London Debate’.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Based Approaches to Counter-Terrorism
    All our experience of tackling terrorism tells us that the ‘hardware’ is useless without the ‘software’… Bringing it Home Community-based approaches to counter-terrorism Rachel Briggs Catherine Fieschi Hannah Lownsbrough About Demos Who we are Demos is the think tank for everyday democracy. We believe everyone should be able to make personal choices in their daily lives that contribute to the common good. Our aim is to put this democratic idea into practice by working with organisations in ways that make them more effective and legitimate. What we work on We focus on six areas: public services; science and technology; cities and public space; people and communities; arts and culture; and global security. Who we work with Our partners include policy-makers, companies, public service providers and social entrepreneurs. Demos is not linked to any party but we work with politicians across political divides. Our international network – which extends across Eastern Europe, Scandinavia, Australia, Brazil, India and China – provides a global perspective and enables us to work across borders. How we work Demos knows the importance of learning from experience. We test and improve our ideas in practice by working with people who can make change happen. Our collaborative approach means that our partners share in the creation and ownership of new ideas. What we offer We analyse social and political change, which we connect to innovation and learning in organisations.We help our partners show thought leadership and respond to emerging policy challenges. How we communicate As an independent voice, we can create debates that lead to real change.We use the media, public events, workshops and publications to communicate our ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Trial by Media1 Judiciary Working Group Session 1 November 2012
    Union Internationale des Avocats: 56th Annual Congress, Dresden Judges, tabloids and trial by media1 Judiciary Working Group Session 1 November 2012 Illustration: Front page of the Sun, 23 March 2011, criticizing judges for being soft on crime. One of their main targets was Lord Justice Leveson; the Sun complained that Leveson LJ “introduced proposals to let 4,000 assault convicts [sic] a year go free rather than face jail”. Introduction Winning in the court of public opinion can be as important as winning in court. This gives the media, especially tabloids, power not only to write about court proceedings, but to influence them. Editorials complaining about “soft” sentencing, recommendations for law reform and accounts of criminal trials form a significant part of the newsgathering process. However, some trials seem to grip the public imagination, and the resultant blizzard of media stories may provoke concerns that the trial process is being overtaken by “trial by media”. Most journalists and media academics consider there is already a satisfactory balance between protection of the judicial process and freedom of expression; all that is needed is a responsive self-regulatory body2 for those cases where there is misconduct. What sort of regulation (if any) 1 Judge J C Gibson, District Court of NSW, Australia; President, Judiciary Working Group. 2 See the proposed models for a revised PCC discussed by Damian Carney, “Media Accountability After the Phone Hacking Inquiry”, Meejalaw 30 August 2012. For media commentary, see “Self-regulation of the press is flawed, but reform is no easy matter”, the Guardian, 20 July 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Hacked? an Investigation Into Phone Hacking and Its Victims Part I: News of the World
    Who was hacked? An investigation into phone hacking and its victims Part I: News of the World March 2015 Martin Moore Cover photo courtesy of tommyslawyer.co.uk Report first published March 2015 Written by Martin Moore Additional research by Felix Tomlinson For comments and corrections please contact the author at [email protected] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 4.0 International License. CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction 4 1. Methodology 6 6 7 Phone hacking - available evidence 8 Phone hacking victims –limitations of the evidence The Mulcaire Papers Mulcaire – one of many engaged in hacking phones 11 2. NumberPhone ofhacking Victims – one of many methods 1613 Total number 16 3. Types of Victim 21 Identifying the victims 18 Identifying types of hacking victims 21 Non-Public Figures 26 Partners & ex-partners Families Friends Professional connections Victims of crime/tragedy Police Journalists Agents Lawyers Random targets Public Figures 34 Entertainment & Music Sports Politics Unions Home Office & Metropolitan Police Royalty and Royal Household Conclusion Witness Protection Programme 43 Appendix 45 Who Was Hacked? An investigation into phone hacking and its victims (Part 1) 2 SUMMARY News of the World Police estimate that 5,500 people were ‘likely’ or ‘potential’ victims of phone hacking. This figure may rise as new evidence comes to light. Due to the incomplete,News of the inconclusive World and sometimes incoherent nature of the evidence, we will never know exactly how many people were hacked by the . Phone hacking was one of a range of methods of gathering personal information, and was often one of the less directly intrusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Full Lateline Transcript
    UK announces inquiry into phone hacking Print Email Australian Broadcasting Corporation Broadcast: 06/07/2011 Reporter: Philip Williams British newspaper News of the World is facing an independent inquiry and the loss of advertisers after a public backlash against phone hacking. Transcript TONY JONES, PRESENTER: The British prime minister, David Cameron, has promised an independent inquiry into allegations of phone hacking by the News of the World. In the latest revelations, police have warned families of those killed in the 2005 London bombings that their mobile phone messages may also have been hacked by the newspaper. The scandal has provoked a public backlash and a number of high-profile companies have withdrawn advertising from the newspaper. With the latest developments, Europe correspondent Philip Williams. PHILIP WILLIAMS, REPORTER: When it was just the rich and famous being hacked, there was interest but not anger. All that has changed with allegations the practice was widespread and included murder victims Milly Dowler and Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells, killed in the village of Soham in 2002. Their parents have been warned they were targeted. As were relatives of some of the victims of the 7/7 London bombings, that news coming just a day before the sixth anniversary of those attacks. GRAHAM FOULKES, FATHER OF LONDON BOMBING VICTIM: My mind went back to 2005 and the real emotional turmoil and state that we were in, and that somebody was listening to that. It's a violation, isn't it? HUGH GRANT, ACTOR: So many of the victims of phone hacking were rich or famous or whatever, ..
    [Show full text]
  • For Distribution to Cps MOD200011979
    For Distribution to CPs Witness Name: Kit Malthouse Statement no: First Exhibit: KM21 Date: 29 February 2012 THE LEVESON INQUIRY Exhibit KM21 to the Witness Statement of Kit Malthouse MOD200011979 For Distribution to CPs Those senior Met Police lunches and dinners witii Nev international: get the list | News | guardian.co.u'^ I'age 1 or y t'^eguardian Those senior M et Police lunches and dinners w ith N ew s In tern atio n al: get the l i s t John Yates and other senior Metropolitan Police officers had regular m eetings with News International staff over the last few years. Find out when » G e t t h e d a t a http ://www.guardian.co.ulc/news/datablog/2011 /j ul/13/j ohn-yates-meeting-news-iiiteniatioiial 2 2 / 0 2 / 2 0 1 2 MOD200011980 For Distribution to CPs liiose senior Met Police lunches and dinners with Ne’^s International: get the list | News | guardian>Go.nV; Page 2 of 9 Assistant Commissioner John Yates gives evidence to a Commons Home Affairs Committee on phone hacldng Photograph: /PA Boris Johnson will today be put under pressure to back calls for Met assistant commissioner John Yates to resign. Dee Doocev. a liberal Democrat member of the London assembly who is also a member of die Metropolitan Police Authority, released dates of dinners and lunches attended by senior Met policing figures over the past few years, including since allegations of phone hacking at the News of the World first surfaced - based on a freedom of information m em bers.
    [Show full text]