DOCSLIB.ORG

4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 1 2 3 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4 5 Chapter 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 1 2 3 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4 5 Chapter 4 1 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 2 3 4 4.1 INTRODUCTION 5 6 Chapter 4 presents a general description of the existing conditions and trends of resources 7 and resource uses in the six-state study area that may be affected by implementing BLM’s and 8 DOE’s proposed alternatives. While the description in general covers the six-state area, with 9 respect to certain resources the discussion of the affected environment on BLM-administered 10 lands receives additional focus. For instance, ecological resources are varied in their distribution, 11 and some that occur in the six-state area are not present on BLM-administered lands. The 12 description of the affected environment in this chapter provides the basis for identifying potential 13 impacts and is of sufficient detail to support the programmatic nature of the Solar PEIS. Detailed 14 descriptions are provided for individual proposed solar energy zones (SEZs) in Chapters 8 15 through 13 of the PEIS. Factors such as climate change that may have an influence on the current 16 conditions and potential trends of individual resources and resource uses have been incorporated 17 as appropriate under individual resource sections that follow. 18 19 The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) manages 20 large acreages of diverse public lands within the six-state study area, with topography ranging 21 from low deserts to high mountains. The land uses are as varied as the terrain and include 22 livestock grazing; fish and wildlife habitat; oil, gas, and mineral exploration and development; 23 right-of-way (ROW) authorizations; a wide range of outdoor recreation activities; and timber 24 production. These uses are managed within a framework of numerous public land laws, the most 25 comprehensive of which is the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA). 26 The FLPMA establishes several fundamental policies regarding the management of public lands 27 (Section 102(a)), including the policy directing that lands be managed “...on the basis of multiple 28 use and sustained yield unless otherwise specified by law.” “Multiple use” means management 29 so that “public lands and their various resource values … are utilized in the combination that will 30 best meet the present and future needs of the American people” (Section 103(c) of FLPMA). 31 “Sustained yield” means the achievement and maintenance in perpetuity of a high level or 32 regular periodic output of the variable renewable resources of the public lands consistent with 33 multiple use (Section 103(h) of FLPMA). 34 35 The uses to which public lands are dedicated and the allocation of those uses are 36 identified in BLM land use plans called Resource Management Plans (RMPs). RMPs are 37 periodically prepared and revised through an open process that encourages input from public 38 land users and other interested individuals and groups regarding the mix of potential uses of the 39 public lands. About 90 land use plans cover the lands within the six-state study area that are 40 being analyzed in this programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) and that could be 41 affected by decisions related to activities evaluated in the PEIS. 42 43 The status of public lands in the six-state study area is constantly changing with the 44 approval of new ROWs, land exchanges, withdrawals, and the implementation of land use plan 45 and management decisions. Some of these changes could be very large including the proposed 46 29 Palms Marine Base Expansion; the proposed legislation to preserve additional lands between Draft Solar PEIS 4-1 December 2010 1 the Mojave National Preserve, Joshua Tree National Park, and the San Bernardino National 2 Forest; and the ongoing consideration of applications for solar energy development on BLM- 3 administered lands. 4 5 Figures 2.2-1 through 2.2-6 in Section 2 show the BLM-administered lands proposed as 6 being available for application for solar energy development in this PEIS. This chapter provides 7 much of the basic land use and resource information that will be used in shaping the decisions 8 regarding potential development of utility-scale solar energy production on the public lands 9 within the six-state study area. 10 11 12 4.2 LANDS AND REALTY 13 14 The BLM administers approximately 245 million acres (more than 1 million km2) of land 15 in 11 western states and Alaska. These lands, which are generally known as “public lands,” are 16 often intermingled with other federal, state, or private lands. The BLM also administers about 17 700 million acres (2.83 million km2) of subsurface mineral estate; some of these mineral estates 18 underlie the BLM-managed lands mentioned above, some underlie lands administered by other 19 federal agencies, and some underlie state or private lands.1 Within the six-state PEIS study area, 20 the BLM manages almost 120 million acres (486,000 km2) of public lands. Table 4.2-1 lists the 21 total surface acreage of the six-state study area as of FY 2007, as well as the acreages of all 22 federal lands and BLM-administered lands. The acreage data used in the table were current at the 23 time of assembly and are still generally representative. 24 25 The public lands included in the PEIS study area experience some of the highest levels 26 of solar insolation in the United States. The existence of blocks of public land that could 27 physically accommodate utility-scale solar development naturally has drawn attention to these 28 areas; however, there also are large blocks of both private and state lands in the same areas with 29 the same solar energy potential that could support utility-scale solar development. 30 31 ROWs are authorized under FLPMA. Section 103(l) FLPMA identifies ROWs as one of 32 the principal or major uses of the public lands. A ROW conveys a legal right to occupy, use, or 33 traverse public lands. The BLM grants or renews ROWs on public lands for a variety of uses, 34 including reservoirs; pipelines; electrical generation, transmission, and distribution systems; and 35 roads (BLM 2005a, 2006). Once granted, a ROW conveys a right to occupy public lands and, 36 depending on the specific ROW grant, provides a priority for use of the public land for the 37 specified term of the ROW. ROWs are typically issued for 20 to 30 years, but some may be 38 granted in perpetuity. Through the land use planning process, the BLM may identify areas that 39 are available for application for various types of ROWs and, in some areas, may identify where 40 ROWs are either to be avoided or excluded. Through its land use planning process, the BLM has 41 identified and continues to identify transmission corridors that are intended to provide locations 42 on federal lands for future electrical and pipeline construction. These corridors would be 43 available to provide for transmission facilities to support renewable energy developments. The 1 Unless specifically noted otherwise, references in this PEIS to lands administered are for surface only and do not include mineral estates. Draft Solar PEIS 4-2 December 2010 TABLE 4.2-1 Acreage and Percentage of BLM-Administered Public Lands in the Six-State Study Area Total State Federal Surface BLM-Administered Acreage Land Acreage Public Lands % BLM Lands State (million acresa) (million acresa) (million acresa) (of total state acreage) Arizona 72.7 33.0 12.2 16.8 California 100.2 45.0 15.2 15.2 Colorado 66.5 24.1 8.3 12.5 Nevada 70.3 58.4 47.8 68.0 New Mexico 77.8 26.5 13.3 17.1 Utah 52.7 34.0 22.8 43.3 Total 440.2 221.0 119.6 27.2 a To convert acres to km2, multiply by 0.004047. Sources: BLM (2007c); percentages calculated. 1 2 3 PEIS entitled Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States (DOE and DOI 2008) 4 (see Section 1.6.2.1), is an example of the ongoing nature of the transmission corridor planning 5 and designation process. 6 7 Applications for utility-scale solar and transmission facilities would be processed as 8 ROW authorizations under Title V of FLPMA and Title 43, Part 2804 of the Code of Federal 9 Regulations (43 CFR Part 2804). 10 11 12 4.3 SPECIALLY DESIGNATED AREAS AND LANDS WITH 13 WILDERNESS CHARACTERISTICS 14 15 Specially designated areas include a variety of types of areas that have received 16 recognition or designation because they possess unique or important resource values. While 17 these areas would not be available for development of solar energy resources, they could be 18 located near solar development areas and could be affected by solar development. 19 20 Examples of BLM-administered specially designated areas include components of the 21 BLM National Landscape Conservation System (NLCS), areas of critical environmental concern 22 (ACECs), special recreation management areas (SRMAs), and areas with wilderness 23 characteristics.2 These areas may have been designated by Executive Order, an Act of Congress, 24 or by the BLM through its land use planning process. The majority of specially designated areas 2 Such an area is a category of land that has been recognized by the BLM as possessing wilderness characteristics but that has not been identified as a Wilderness Study Area (WSA). If the BLM has made a decision in a RMP to manage lands to protect these wilderness characteristics, they are not open to application for solar energy development. Draft Solar PEIS 4-3 December 2010 1 discussed in this PEIS are located on BLM-administered public lands; however, some specially 2 designated areas managed by the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group SONORA MUD TURTLE Kinosternon sonoriense Family: KINOSTERNIDAE Order: TESTUDINES Class: REPTILIA R002 Written by: L. Palermo Reviewed by: T. Papenfuss Edited by: R. Duke, J. Duke Updated by: CWHR Program Staff, March 2000 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The Sonora mud turtle may be extinct in California (Jennings 1983). Historically, in California, its elevational range extended from 43 m (140 ft) to 155 m (510 ft) (Jennings and Hayes 1994). Early records were along the lower Colorado River at Palo Verde and the Yuma Indian Reservation, Imperial County (VanDenburgh 1922). Dill (1944) observed this species in the lower Colorado River in 1942, however, no specimens were collected. The most recent positive record was in 1962 in a canal near the Laguna Dam on the Arizona side of the Colorado River (Funk 1974). Occurs in lacustrine and riverine habitats. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Primarily carnivorous, although some aquatic plant material is taken. Feeds mainly on aquatic insects and larvae, and includes fish, frogs, carrion, small mollusks and crustaceans in the diet. Food animals are either benthic or associated with submergent vegetation. Plant material includes aquatic angiosperms and green algae. Opportunistic shifts in diet occur in response to shifts in prey availability. Turtles will shift to more omnivorous food habits in habitats where benthic invertebrates are less abundant. No difference between male and female feeding habits, nor shifts in diet with age. Forage by crawling slowly and methodically along bottom in shallow water in both dense vegetation and open water.
    [Show full text]
  • MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS the VERANDA at INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1
    MONK & ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS THE VERANDA AT INDIAN SPRINGS 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 LINCOLN AVE CALISTOGA, CALIFORNIA July 16, 2020 Prepared for Metropolitan Planning Group 1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 100-B Napa, California 94559 Attention: Ms. Olivia Ervin Prepared by Monk & Associates, Inc. 1136 Saranap Avenue, Suite Q Walnut Creek, California 94595 Contact: Ms. Sarah Lynch 1136 Saranap Ave., Suite Q Walnut Creek California 94595 (925) 947-4867 FAX (925) 947-1165 Biological Resources Constraints Analysis MONK & ASSOCIATES The Veranda at Indian Springs 1522, 1510, 1506, 1502, 1504 Lincoln Ave Calistoga, California APNs 011‐034‐003; ‐004; -005; ‐006; ‐021; ‐022; 028; ‐029 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................................................................................... 1 3. STUDY METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 1 4. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES .................................... 2 4.1 Evaluation for Waters of the U.S. and Waters of the State .................................................... 3 4.1.1 APPLICABILITY TO THE PROJECT SITE..................................................................................... 3 5. SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES ISSUES .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Tuesday, August 9, 2005 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Roswell springsnail, Koster’s springsnail, Noel’s amphipod, and Pecos assiminea as Endangered With Critical Habitat; Final Rule VerDate jul<14>2003 18:26 Aug 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09AUR2.SGM 09AUR2 46304 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: in coastal brackish waters or along tropical and temperate seacoasts Background Fish and Wildlife Service worldwide (Taylor 1987). Inland species It is our intent to discuss only those of the genus Assiminea are known from 50 CFR Part 17 topics directly relevant to this final around the world, and in North America listing determination. For more RIN 1018–AI15 they occur in California (Death Valley information on the four invertebrates, National Monument), Utah, New Endangered and Threatened Wildlife refer to the February 12, 2002, proposed Mexico, Texas (Pecos and Reeves and Plants; Listing Roswell rule (67 FR 6459). However, some of Counties), and Mexico (Bolso´n de springsnail, Koster’s springsnail, this information is discussed in our Cuatro Cı´enegas). Noel’s amphipod, and Pecos analyses below, such as the summary of The Roswell springsnail and Koster’s assiminea as Endangered With Critical factors affecting the species. springsnail are aquatic species. These Habitat Springsnails snails have lifespans of 9 to 15 months and reproduce several times during the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, The Permian Basin of the spring through fall breeding season Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecol 483/583 – Herpetology Lab 11: Reptile Diversity 3: Testudines and Crocodylia Spring 2010
    Ecol 483/583 – Herpetology Lab 11: Reptile Diversity 3: Testudines and Crocodylia Spring 2010 P.J. Bergmann & S. Foldi Lab objectives The objectives of today’s lab are to: 1. Familiarize yourselves with extant diversity of the Testudines and Crocodylia. 2. Learn to identify species of Testundines that live in Arizona. Today's lab is the final lab on "reptile" diversity, and will introduce you to the Testudines, or turtles and tortoises, Crocodylia. Although there are no crocodylians in Arizona and the Testudine diversity is lower than that of the lizards or snakes, there is still a fair amount of material to learn, so use your time wisely. Tips for learning the material At this point in the course, your skills for learning herp diversity should be well honed, so continue with the strategies you have already learned during the semester. Learn how to differentiate the three major clades of Crocodylians, and the more numerous Testudine clades. There is another keying exercise in this lab, focusing on the Testudines. 1 Ecol 483/583 – Lab 11: Testudines & Crocs 2010 Exercise 1: Testudines (Modified from Bonine & Foldi 2008; Bonine, Dee & Hall 2006; Edwards 2002; Prival 2000) General information Turtles are probably the most instantly recognizable groups of all reptiles because of their shell and the ability to withdraw their heads and limbs into this protective structure. Turtles are a monophyletic group comprising the order Testudines also called Chelonia . Testudines is the term used to denote all members of the order (extant and extinct) whereas Chelonia is often used to denote extant turtles.
    [Show full text]
  • Boraginaceae), with an Emphasis on the Popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys)
    Diversification, biogeography, and classification of Amsinckiinae (Boraginaceae), with an emphasis on the popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys) By Christopher Matthew Guilliams A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Professor David Ackerly Professor Brent Mishler Professor Patrick O'Grady Summer 2015 Abstract Diversification, biogeography, and classification of Amsinckiinae (Boraginaceae), with an emphasis on the popcornflowers (Plagiobothrys) by Christopher Matthew Guilliams Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Amsinckiinae is a diverse and ecologically important subtribe of annual herbaceous or perennial suffrutescent taxa with centers of distribution in western North America and southern South America. Taxa in the subtribe occur in all major ecosystems in California and more broadly in western North America, from the deserts of Baja California in the south where Johnstonella and Pectocarya are common, north to the ephemeral wetland ecosystems of the California Floristic Province where a majority of Plagiobothrys sect. Allocarya taxa occur, and east to the Basin and Range Province of western North America, where Cryptantha sensu stricto (s.s.) and Oreocarya are well represented. The subtribe minimally includes 9 genera: Amsinckia, Cryptantha s.s., Eremocarya, Greeneocharis, Harpagonella, Johnstonella, Oreocarya, Pectocarya, and Plagiobothrys; overall minimum-rank taxonomic diversity in the subtribe is ca. 330-342 taxa, with ca. 245--257 taxa occurring in North America, 86 in South America, and 4 in Australia. Despite their prevalence on the landscape and a history of active botanical research for well over a century, considerable research needs remain in Amsinckiinae, especially in one of the two largest genera, Plagiobothrys.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Ecology of Rare Plants Within Complex Local Habitat Networks
    Conservation ecology of rare plants within complex local habitat networks B ENJAMIN J. CRAIN,ANA M ARÍA S ÁNCHEZ-CUERVO,JEFFREY W. WHITE and S TEVEN J. STEINBERG Abstract Effective conservation of rare plant species Introduction requires a detailed understanding of their unique distribu- tions and habitat requirements to identify conservation lant taxa dominate lists of rare and threatened species targets. Research suggests that local conservation efforts Pand should be prioritized for conservation (Dixon & 1989 1991 1993 may be one of the best means for accomplishing this task. Cook, ; Campbell, ; Ellstrand & Elam, ; 2011 fi We conducted a geographical analysis of the local distribu- Sharrock, ). Habitat speci city is often used as a primary 1981 tions of rare plants in Napa County, California, to identify criterion for classifying rare species (Rabinowitz, ) and a spatial relationships with individual habitat types. We detailed understanding of the distribution and habitats of measured the potential contribution of individual habitats rare plants is critical for proactive conservation planning to rare plant conservation by integrating analyses on overall and for identifying areas of interest for preservation (Griggs, 1940 1998 2000 2006 diversity, species per area, specificity-weighted richness, ; Wiser et al., ; Wu & Smeins, ; Peterson, ; 2007 fi presence of hotspots, and the composition of the rare plant Fiedler et al., ). The rst stage of systematic conser- community in each habitat type. This combination of vation planning, which is a structured framework for analyses allowed us to determine which habitats are most identifying and maintaining priority areas for biodiversity significant for rare plant conservation at a local scale. Our preservation, prioritizes the compilation of distribution analyses indicated that several habitat types were consist- data for rare and threatened species as they are usually ently associated with rare plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Montezuma Well U.S
    National Park Service Montezuma Well U.S. Department of the Interior Montezuma Castle National Monument Turtles in Trouble Montezuma Well’s unique habitat provides an ideal home for one of the desert’s more peculiar inhabitants, the Sonora mud turtle. The constant supply of warm, fresh water and an abundance of small invertebrates and aquatic insects is all these resilient turtles need to survive and to thrive. But there is trouble in paradise. Through the years people have released red- eared sliders, a turtle commonly sold in pet stores, into the waters of the Well. These aggressive invaders out-compete the smaller, native mud turtles and jeopardize the health of an aquatic ecosystem like no other in the © National Park Service world. To address this pressing issue and help protect Montezuma Well’s fragile ecosystem, the National Park Service is teaming with the USGS Southwest Biological Science Center, the Western National Parks Association, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department to conduct an ambitious project to study the negative impacts of the invasive red-eared sliders and relocate them to privately-owned habitats and public school classrooms outside the park. Sonora Mud Turtle The only turtle native to Montezuma Sonora mud turtles can reach six and a Well, Sonora mud turtles are easily half inches in length and may be (Kinosternon sonoriense) spotted basking on logs and swimming identified by their smooth, elongated around the water’s edge. These cold- carapace (upper part of the shell). The blooded reptiles depend on the shell generally has a uniform light- environment to determine their body brown or yellowish-brown color and is temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Rule for 16 Plant Taxa from the Northern Channel Islands
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 25, 1995 / Proposed Rules 37993 Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Final promulgation of the regulations Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES Services, Endangered Species Permits, on these species will take into section). 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon consideration the comments and any Author. The primary author of this 97232±4181 (telephone 503/231±2063; additional information received by the document is Debra Kinsinger, Carlsbad Field facsimile 503/231±6243). Service, and such communications may Office (see ADDRESSES section). lead to a final regulation that differs Public Comments Solicited List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 from this proposal. The Service intends that any final The Endangered Species Act provides Endangered and threatened species, action resulting from this proposal will for one or more public hearings on this Exports, Imports, Reporting and be as accurate and as effective as proposal, if requested. Requests must be recordkeeping requirements, and possible. Therefore, comments or received by September 25, 1995. Such Transportation. suggestions from the public, other requests must be made in writing and concerned governmental agencies, the addressed to the Field Supervisor of the Proposed Regulation Promulgation scientific community, industry, or any Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES Accordingly, the Service hereby other interested party concerning this section). proposes to amend part 17, subchapter proposed rule are hereby solicited. National Environmental Policy Act B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Comments particularly are sought Federal Regulations, as set forth below: concerning: The Fish and Wildlife Service has (1) Biological, commercial trade, or determined that Environmental PART 17Ð[AMENDED] other relevant data concerning any Assessments or Environmental Impact threat (or lack thereof) to Sibara filifolia, Statements, as defined under the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Overview Fact Sheet
    southwestlearning.org MONTEZUMA WELL Sonoran Mud Turtle FACTOVERVIEW SHEET U (Kinostemon sonoriense) SGS / DRO S The Sonoran mud turtle (Kinostemon sonoriense) is the only T E native turtle species living in Montezuma Well. The nor- T A mal geographic range of Sonoran mud turtles is throughout L. (2012:CO the Southwest, into southern California, and into northwest- ern Mexico. Montezuma Well is the most permanent water V ER) source in the Sonoran mud turtle range (Stanila 2009), with a near constant water temperature of about 70 degrees F (Blinn 2008). The Well is also unique in its high carbon dioxide con- centrations, number of endemic species (found nowhere else in the world), and lack of fish and amphibians. Sonoran mud turtles are medium-sized (up to 6 ½ inches long, with the females larger than the males), with high-domed smooth shells. The shells are light-brown to yellowish brown, Montezuma Well. and often covered in algae, and the skin is dark olive with yel- low and cream colored markings on the head and neck (Ollig 2008). As a water-dwelling species, Sonoran mud turtles also Sonoran mud turtles may live more than 40 years in the wild. have webbed feet. The females reach maturity between five and nine years old, and may lay two clutches of eggs per year (usually 6-7 eggs The Sonoran mud turtle is primarily carnivorous, but an op- per clutch). At Montezuma Well, the females move away portunistic forager (Lovich et al. 2010). At Montezuma Well, from the water to nest, laying eggs between May and October the mud turtles feed primarily on invertebrates (amphipods and (Drost et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Ichetucknee Siltsnail (Floridobia Mica) in Coffee Spring, Ichetucknee Springs State Park, Suwannee County, Florida, November 2015
    Status of the Ichetucknee Siltsnail (Floridobia mica) in Coffee Spring, Ichetucknee Springs State Park, Suwannee County, Florida, November 2015 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfwm/article-supplement/210502/pdf/10_3996052017-jfwm-042_s12 by guest on 27 September 2021 Gary L. Warren and Jennifer Bernatis, Ph.D. Freshwater Invertebrate Resource Assessment and Research Unit Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 7386 NW 71st Street Gainesville, FL 32653 [email protected] Status of the Ichetucknee Siltsnail (Floridobia mica) in Coffee Spring, Ichetucknee Springs State Park, Suwannee County, Florida, November 2015 Introduction The Ichetucknee Siltsnail (Floridobia mica, Figure 1) is one of eleven snails of the genus Floridobia endemic to single Florida spring systems and is the lone endemic siltsnail known to occur in the Suwannee River basin. Floridobia mica has been found only in Coffee Spring, a third magnitude spring that is one of several springs located within Ichetucknee Springs State Park, Columbia and Suwannee Counties, Florida. Since F. mica inhabits only one location, its Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfwm/article-supplement/210502/pdf/10_3996052017-jfwm-042_s12 by guest on 27 September 2021 population is vulnerable to extinction from any environmental perturbation that adversely affects habitat or water quality where it resides. F. mica has a global ranking of G1 (critically imperiled) in the Nature Serve ranking system and is categorized as S1 (critically imperiled) by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory. The snail is designated as a Species of Greatest Conservation Need by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and was one of ten Florida siltsnail species petitioned for federal listing as threatened or endangered by the Center for Biological Diversity, Tucson, Arizona, in their 2010 “megapetition” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]