Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
No Action Alternative Report
No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) ....................................................................................................... -
The Battles of Germantown: Public History and Preservation in America’S Most Historic Neighborhood During the Twentieth Century
The Battles of Germantown: Public History and Preservation in America’s Most Historic Neighborhood During the Twentieth Century Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David W. Young Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Steven Conn, Advisor Saul Cornell David Steigerwald Copyright by David W. Young 2009 Abstract This dissertation examines how public history and historic preservation have changed during the twentieth century by examining the Germantown neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Founded in 1683, Germantown is one of America’s most historic neighborhoods, with resonant landmarks related to the nation’s political, military, industrial, and cultural history. Efforts to preserve the historic sites of the neighborhood have resulted in the presence of fourteen historic sites and house museums, including sites owned by the National Park Service, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and the City of Philadelphia. Germantown is also a neighborhood where many of the ills that came to beset many American cities in the twentieth century are easy to spot. The 2000 census showed that one quarter of its citizens live at or below the poverty line. Germantown High School recently made national headlines when students there attacked a popular teacher, causing severe injuries. Many businesses and landmark buildings now stand shuttered in community that no longer can draw on the manufacturing or retail economy it once did. Germantown’s twentieth century has seen remarkably creative approaches to contemporary problems using historic preservation at their core. -
Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types
Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp. -
Nomination of Historic Building, Structure, Site, Or
NOMINATION OF HISTORIC BUILDING, STRUCTURE, SITE, OR OBJECT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM ON CD (MS WORD FORMAT) 1. ADDRESS OF HISTORIC RESOURCE (must comply with a Board of Revision of Taxes address) Street address:___ 125 W. Walnut Lane _______________________________________ Postal code:___ 19144 _____ Councilmanic District:__ 8 _____________________ 2. NAME OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Historic Name:_____ George T. Pearson Residence ___________________________________ Common Name:_________________________________________________________________ 3. TYPE OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Building Structure Site Object 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Condition: excellent good fair poor ruins Occupancy: occupied vacant under construction unknown Current use:____ Offices ________________________________________________________ 5. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Please attach a plot plan and written description of the boundary. 6. DESCRIPTION Please attach a description of the historic resource. 7. SIGNIFICANCE Please attach the Statement of Significance. Period of Significance (from year to year): from __ 1893 ___ to __ 1955 ___ Date(s) of construction and/or alteration:____ c. 1893 ___________________________________ Architect, engineer, and/or designer:___ George T. Pearson ______________________________ Builder, contractor, and/or artisan:___________________________________________________ Original owner:___ George T. & Mary Pearson _________________________________________ -
Philadelphia Trail Master Plan 2020 Update
2020 UPDATE PHILADELPHIA TRAIL PLAN Image Source: Philadelphia Inquirer Cobbs Creek Connector A 1 THE YEAR IN TRAILS 2 PRIORITY STATUS UPDATE 3 TRAIL DEVELOPMENT 4 NEXT STEPS Schuylkill River Swing Bridge Construction | SRDC 2 THE YEAR IN TRAILS 2020 TRAIL PLAN UPDATE PURPOSE The Philadelphia Trail Master Plan is a recommendation Due to limited funding for trail and park projects, the City of Philadelphia2035, the City’s Comprehensive Plan. This recognized the need for prioritizing proposed trail projects recommendation is listed in the Renew section under Goal to serve Philadelphians citywide and to best use available 6.1 Watershed Parks and Trails: Complete, expand, and planning, design, and construction funding. connect watershed parks and trails in the City and the region. The Trail Master Plan process began in the spring The Trail Master Plan outlines four overarching goals of 2011 as a joint effort of the Philadelphia City Planning of the Philadelphia trail network: connectivity, safety, Commission (PCPC) and Philadelphia Parks & Recreation encouragement of physical activity, and open space. The (PPR), in collaboration with the Office of Transportation, purpose of the City trail planning process is to ensure that Infrastructure, and Sustainability (OTIS). proposed trail development projects in Philadelphia meet these goals. As the status of the trail network is constantly The 2020 Philadelphia Trail Plan Update builds on the changing, the annual update offers the opportunity to Philadelphia Trail Master Plan adopted by the PCPC in document and reevaluate these priorities from year to year 2013 and its subsequent annual updates in 2014, 2015, 2017, in order to provide Philadelphians with a connected and 2018 and 2019. -
109 ®SEPT Ective September 2, 2019 Eff
A 109 ®SEPT ective September 2, 2019 Eff Chester Transportation Center to 69th Street Transportation Center Serving Springfield and Lansdowne Customer Service 610-734-1300 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org La 104 69th Street ns 112120 d W 123 126 Transportation Center ow est Chester Pk Spr n d Steel Rd ownship Line Rd e R oul Rd T A erminal ® w v T Sq lo Dre Fairfield St ol Market x 69th St H el A A o n B Connections at v ax ur P m v 69th Street Transportation Center: o Sherbr n 102 t Market-Frankford Line, R 101 Blvd d d 68 Norristown High Speed Line ook R 320 e Garrett Rd 108 n 21, 30, 65, 68, 101, 102, 103, 104, i L 476 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, L 113 p o i Lansdo shall Rd n h Mar g s 112, 113, 120, 123, 126 n L a a L w o wne A h T c shall Rd r LANSDOWNE Mar v u v A Union A h Shadeland A e C Springfield Rd oke Av b 113 Burmont Rd Pembr m v State Rd o oke A v 115 c embr Garrett Rd t A v P Stewar y W Center v v SPRINGFIELD 107 LANSDOWNE City Baltimore A Lansdo MALL STATION STATION 101 110 Target 113 y Rd v W wne A oo Bail oul Rd dl 115 an d Springfield Rd GLADSTONE Spr A v v STATION Sheffield Bishop A Mercy Fitzgerald Dr vidence Rd Macy’s Oak A o Hospital 320 Pr SPRINGFIELDSa Main St 107 109 Leamx CLIFTON-ALDAN er v DARBY 110 320 A STATION MacDade Blvd altimore Swar v B Pk y A Bishop A Springfield Rd 109 v Baltimore Pk N Springfield thmore o r A t PRIMOS STATION v Cedar La h Mall Olde A v ® v oul Rd Springfield Sproul S C W Darby o Provi Baltimore Pk Spr dence Rd 476 o Pr Mall d Transportation l v a SECANE STATION o A n Center -
DVRPC Approved Projects for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 New Jersey Highway Projects (Local) Status Updates
DVRPC Approved Projects for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 New Jersey Highway Projects (Local) Status Updates DBNUM County Project Title Project Description ARRA Amount * Let Date Award Date Award $ Comments FSD09698 Burlington Resurfacing Program, Milling 2" of surface course and resurfacing milled area with 2" of pavement at four locations: Marne Highway, from Hartford $2,500,000 N/A N/A $0 Funding authorized Burlington County Road to Mt. Holly Bypass; Old York Road, from CR 543 to CR 678 and from CR 545 to CR 677, and Jacksonville-Hedding Road, from CR 660 to CR 543 . All work will be done within the existing county Right of way. The relocation of the existing utilities will not be required. Also, the milling and resurfacing will occur within the existing pavement. This project combines the following 3 ARRA projects: FSD09483, FSD09484, and FSD09485. FSD09697 Burlington Traffic Signal Coordinate and upgrade fifteen intersections on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way in Burlington Township and $5,500,000 N/A N/A $0 Funding authorized Upgrade & Willingboro Township, and 8 existing signalized intersections on CR 541/Stokes Road in Medford Township and Medford Coordination, Lakes Borough. The fifteen intersections on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way will be coordinated and added to the Burlington County existing Traffic Signal Coordination System. The existing 8 signal system on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way uses radio frequencies which will be replaced with fiber optics and will be coordinated with the existing Signal Coordination System in the County and operated from the County's Traffic Operations Center This project will provide traffic signal coordination for improved vehicle progression; detect and report traffic signal malfunctions, and automatically collect and archive traffic data. -
Lifeline Transit Service 30 20 30 90
LIFELINE TRANSIT SERVICE APRIL 26, 2020 109 Chester Transportation Center to 69th Street Transportation Center Serving Springfield and Lansdowne FOR MORE INFORMATION: Customer Service: 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY: 215-580-7853 www.septa.org For real time bus information, go to www.septa.org/transitview and click on your route, or use the SEPTA app. LIFELINE SERVICE OPERATING 24 HOURS BASED ON SATURDAY SCHEDULE every every every every 30 20 30 90 minutes or less minutes or less minutes or less minutes or less 6:00AM 9:00AM 6:30PM 8:30PM 6:00AM L an 69th Street sd W Transportation Center ow est Chester Pk Spr n d Steel Rd ownship Line Rd e 104 R oul Rd T A erminal ® w v T Sq lo Dre Fairfield St ol Connections at 69th Street Transportation Center: Market x 69th St H el A A o n B Market-Frankford Line, Norristown High Speed Line, v ax ur P m v o 21, 65, 68, 101, 104, Sherbr n t 108, 109, 110, 113 R 101 Blvd d d ook 68 R 320 e Garrett Rd n 108 i L 476 L 113 p o i Lansdo shall Rd n h Mar g s n L a a L w o wne A h T c shall Rd r Mar v u LANSDOWNE h v A Union A Shadeland A e C Springfield Rd oke Av b 113 Burmont Rd Pembr m v State Rd o oke A v c embr Garrett Rd t A v P Stewar y W Center v v LANSDOWNE City Baltimore A Lansdo STATION y Rd v 113 W wne A oo Bail dl an d Springfield Rd GLADSTONE A v v STATION Bishop A Mercy Fitzgerald vidence Rd Oak A Pro Hospital SPRINGFIELDSa Main St Leamx CLIFTON-ALDAN er v DARBY 320 A STATION MacDade Blvd v y A Bishop A Springfield Rd v Baltimore Pk N o r t h PRIMOS STATION Olde A v v ® oul Rd Sproul S C W Darby Springfield -
The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2013 The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia Ellis Miller Mumford University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Mumford, Ellis Miller, "The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia" (2013). Theses (Historic Preservation). 217. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/217 Suggested Citation: Mumford, Ellis Miller (2013). The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/217 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia Abstract This thesis was intended to begin to fill in a gap in preservation literature by beginning research in Philadelphia and evaluating how, if at all, historic preservation affects social wellbeing. By considering tax credit investment alongside various statistical measures of social wellbeing in Philadelphia census block groups, this study tested some hypotheses about the power of preservation in community revitalization. The primary hypothesis tested is that historic preservation activity improves social wellbeing in Philadelphia. More specific hypotheses include: • Historic preservation improves the physical appearance of neighborhoods. • Historic preservation reduces crime, especially building-specific crime such as arson and graffiti. • Historic preservation preserves affordable housing. • Historic preservation creates more educated communities. -
109 Chester Transportation Center to 69Th Street Transportation Center
Effective June 15, 2020 109 Chester Transportation Center to 69th Street Transportation Center Serving Springfield and Lansdowne FOR MORE INFORMATION: Customer Service: 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY: 215-580-7853 www.septa.org La 104 69th Street ns 112120 d W 123 126 Transportation Center ow est Chester Pk Spr n d Steel Rd ownship Line Rd e R oul Rd T A erminal ® w v T Sq lo Dre Fairfield St ol Market x 69th St H el A o n B Connections at v ax ur A P m v 69th Street Transportation Center: o Sherb n 102 t Market-Frankford Line, R 101 Blvd d d 68 Norristown High Speed Line rook R 320 e Garrett Rd 108 n 21, 30, 65, 68, 101, 102, 103, 104, i L 476 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, L 113 p o i Lansd shall Rd n h Mar g s 112, 113, 120, 123, 126 n L a a L w o o wne A h T c rshall Rd r LANSDOWNE Ma v u v A Union h Shadeland e C Springfield Rd oke Av b 113 Burmont Rd Pembr m v State Rd o A A roke v 115 c emb Garrett Rd t A v P Stewar y A W Center v v SPRINGFIELD 107 LANSDOWNE City Baltimore A Lansd MALL STATION STATION 101 110 Target 113 o y Rd v l W wne oo Bai oul Rd dl 115 an d Springfield Rd GLADSTONE A Spr A v v STATION Sheffield Bishop A Mercy Fitzgerald Dr vidence Rd Macy’s Oak o Hospital 320 Pr SPRINGFIELDSa Main St 107 109 Leamx A CLIFTON-ALDAN er v DARBY 110 320 A STATION MacDade Blvd altimore Swa v B Pk y Bishop Springfield Rd A N r 109 v Baltimore Pk Springfield thmore o r A t PRIMOS STATION v Cedar La h Mall A Olde A v ® v oul Rd Springfield Sproul S C W Darby o Provi Baltimore Pk Spr dence Rd 476 o Pr Mall d Transportation l v a SECANE STATION -
Parking Demand Study
SEPTA R3 MEDIA / ELWYN RAIL LINE PARKING DEMAND STUDY DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 111 S. Independence Mall East Philadelphia, PA 19106-2515 May 1999 SEPTA R3 MEDIA / ELWYN RAIL LINE PARKING DEMAND STUDY DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 111 S. Independence Mall East Philadelphia, PA 19106-2515 May 1999 he preparation of this report was funded through grants from the U.S. Department Tof Transportation's Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agency. reated in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an Cinterstate, intercounty and intercity agency which provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning for the orderly growth and development of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. The Commission is an advisory agency which divides its planning and service functions between the Office of the Executive Director, the Office of Public Affairs, and three line Divisions: Transportation Planning, Regional Planning, and Adm'inistration. DVRPC's mission for the 1990s is to emphasize technical assistance and services and to conduct high priority studies for member state and local governments, while determining and meeting the needs of the private sector. he DVRPC logo is adapted from the official seal of the TCommission and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River flowing through it. -
A Feasibility Study Update for the TOOKANY CREEK TRAIL CHELTENHAM AVE
A Feasibility Study Update For THE TOOKANY CREEK TRAIL CHELTENHAM AVE. TO HIGH SCHOOL RD. – CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP PREPARED FOR: Cheltenham Township Tookany Creek Trail (Existing Footpath) North of Central Ave. March 29, 2021 Prepared by: In association with: Campbell Thomas & Co. BCM Engineers 1504 South Street 920 Germantown Pike, Suite 200 Philadelphia, PA 19146 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 215-985-4354 610-313-310 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES: Funding for this project was provided by the following sources: • This project was financed in part by a grant from the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) Regional Trails Program • This project was financed in part by Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) • This project was financed in part by Tookany/Tacony-Frankford Watershed Partnership (TTF) In developing the Tookany Creek Trail there will be ample opportunity restore and improve the streambank, as well as provide educational signage that will enhance the user experience. T1 Tookany Creek Trail Feasibility Study Update TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction and Purpose 1 It’s A Beautiful Spring Morning in 2025 Background – Cheltenham Township’s Efforts to Date Purpose, Goals and Objectives of the Study The Study Advisory Committee The Project Team Delineation of Study Area B. Legal Feasibility 7 Ownership Conditions Along the Proposed Corridors Adjacent Land Ownership and Impact Acquisition Alternatives C. Potential Trail Use and Demand 10 Interviews/Public Involvement General Demographics of Potential Trail Users Potential Demand and Use of the Trail Potential Links & Connectors D. Physical Inventory and Assessment of the Proposed Route(s) 17 Alternative Alignments Physiographic Analysis Natural Features Inventory Wildlife Analysis within the Corridor Significant Structures within the Corridor Infrastructure and Utilities Intersections and Access Points E.