Localisation Effects in Literature: Peer Quantity, Quality, Or Productivity?
Localisation effects in literature: Peer quantity, quality, or productivity? Sara Mitchell∗ TU Dortmund Abstract This paper utilises a unique dataset on 369 prominent authors in the UK and Ireland from 1725-1975 to provides evidence of on localisation effects (the number of authors in agiven location) and urbanisation effects (the general urban environment). This paper also tests whether localisation effects occur through a quality channel (the quality of co-located au- thors), a quantity channel (the number of co-located authors), or a productivity channel (the output of co-located authors). It also uses data on author social connections to dis- entangle the effects of co-located social connections and the effects of other authors living in the same city. The results suggests that the localisation of authors in London results in a ‘crowding out’ effects, while London urbanisation effects have a positive impact on own-productivity. The localisation effects occur primarily through quality and productivity channels, and these effects occur through the general clustering of authors and not through co-located social connections. There is also evidence that authors benefit most from locali- sation effects when they are under the age of 40 and thus in the early stages of theircareer. Keywords: Economic geography, geographic concentration, peer effects, cities, productiv- ity, urban history, literary artists JEL Classifications: J24, J61, N30, N90, R19, Z11 ∗The data collection for this paper was possible through the support of the Grattan Scholar Programme at Trinity College Dublin. I thank Christiane Hellmanzik, Lukas Kuld, Maren Kaliske, John O’Hagan, Amir B. Ferreira Neto, Ronan Lyons, Vahagn Galstyan, Sanna Nivakoski, Michael O’Grady, Gavin Morrison, Nathaniel Russell for their helpful comments on various drafts.
[Show full text]