DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1901.01378V2 [Math-Ph] 8 Apr 2020 Where A(P, Q) Is the Arithmetic Mean of the Vectors P and Q, G(P, Q) Is Their P Geometric Mean, and Tr X Stands for Xi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MATRIX VERSIONS OF THE HELLINGER DISTANCE RAJENDRA BHATIA, STEPHANE GAUBERT, AND TANVI JAIN Abstract. On the space of positive definite matrices we consider dis- tance functions of the form d(A; B) = [trA(A; B) − trG(A; B)]1=2 ; where A(A; B) is the arithmetic mean and G(A; B) is one of the different versions of the geometric mean. When G(A; B) = A1=2B1=2 this distance is kA1=2− 1=2 1=2 1=2 1=2 B k2; and when G(A; B) = (A BA ) it is the Bures-Wasserstein metric. We study two other cases: G(A; B) = A1=2(A−1=2BA−1=2)1=2A1=2; log A+log B the Pusz-Woronowicz geometric mean, and G(A; B) = exp 2 ; the log Euclidean mean. With these choices d(A; B) is no longer a metric, but it turns out that d2(A; B) is a divergence. We establish some (strict) convexity properties of these divergences. We obtain characterisations of barycentres of m positive definite matrices with respect to these distance measures. 1. Introduction Let p and q be two discrete probability distributions; i.e. p = (p1; : : : ; pn) and q = (q1; : : : ; qn) are n -vectors with nonnegative coordinates such that P P pi = qi = 1: The Hellinger distance between p and q is the Euclidean norm of the difference between the square roots of p and q ; i.e. 1=2 1=2 p p hX p p 2i hX X p i d(p; q) = k p− qk2 = ( pi − qi) = (pi + qi) − 2 piqi : (1) This distance and its continuous version, are much used in statistics, where it is customary to take d (p; q) = p1 d(p; q) as the definition of the Hellinger H 2 distance. We have then p dH (p; q) = trA(p; q) − trG(p; q); (2) arXiv:1901.01378v2 [math-ph] 8 Apr 2020 where A(p; q) is the arithmetic mean of the vectors p and q; G(p; q) is their P geometric mean, and tr x stands for xi: A matrix/noncommutative/quantum version would seek to replace the probability vectors p and q by density matrices A and B ; i.e., positive semidefinite matrices A; B with tr A = tr B = 1: In the discussion that fol- lows, the restriction on trace is not needed, and so we let A and B be any two positive semidefinite matrices. On the other hand, a part of our analysis requires A and B to be positive definite. This will be clear from the context. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 15B48, 49K35, 94A17, 81P45. Key words and phrases. Geometric mean, matrix divergence, Bregman divergence, relative entropy, strict convexity, barycentre. 1 2 RAJENDRA BHATIA, STEPHANE GAUBERT, AND TANVI JAIN We let P be the set of n×n complex positive definite matrices. The notation A > 0 means that A is positive (semi) definite. Here we run into the essential difference between the matrix and the scalar case. For positive definite matrices A and B; there is only one possible arith- metic mean, A(A; B) = (A + B)=2: However, the geometric mean G(A; B) could have different meanings. Each of these leads to a different version of the Hellinger distance on matrices. In this paper we study some of these distances and their properties. The Euclidean inner product on n × n matrices is defined as hA; Bi = tr A∗B: The associated Euclidean norm is ∗ 1=2 X 2 1=2 kAk2 = (tr A A) = ( jaijj ) : Recall that the matrices AB and BA have the same eigenvalues. Thus if A and B are positive definite, then AB is not positive definite unless A and B commute. However, the eigenvalues of AB are all positive as they are the same as the eigenvalues of A1=2BA1=2: Also every matrix with positive eigenvalues has a unique square root with positive eigenvalues. If A; B are positive definite, then we denote by (AB)1=2 the square root that has positive eigenvalues. Since (AB)1=2 = A1=2(A1=2BA1=2)1=2A−1=2; the matrices (AB)1=2 and (A1=2BA1=2)1=2 are similar, and hence have the same eigenvalues. The straightforward generalisation of (1) for positive definite matrices A; B is evidently 1=2 1=2 1=2 1=21=2 d1(A; B) = kA − B k2 = tr(A + B) − 2trA B : (3) Another version could be 1=2 1=2 1=21=2 1=21=2 d2(A; B) = tr(A + B) − 2tr(A BA ) = tr(A + B) − 2tr(AB) : (4) While it is clear from (3) that d1 is a metric on P; it is not obvious that d2 is a metric. It turns out that 1=2 1=2 d2(A; B) = min kA − B Uk2; (5) where the minimum is taken over all unitary matrices U: It follows from this that d2 is a metric. This is called the Bures distance in the quantum information literature and the Wasserstein metric in the literature on optimal transport. It plays an important role in both these subjects. We refer the reader to [18] for a recent exposition, and to [12, 26, 28, 36] for earlier work. The quantity F (A; B) = tr(A1=2BA1=2)1=2 is called the fidelity between the ∗ ∗ states A and B: In the special case when A =puu ;B = vv are pure ∗ ∗ 1=2 states, we have F (A; B) = ju vj and d2(A; B) = 2(1 − ju vj) : For qubit states this is the distance on the Bloch sphere. 3 For various reasons, theoretical and practical, the most accepted definition of geometric mean of A; B is the entity A#B = A1=2(A−1=2BA−1=2)1=2A1=2: (6) This formula was introduced by Pusz and Woronowicz [32]. When A and B commute A#B reduces to A1=2B1=2: The mean A#B has been studied extensively for several years and has remarkable properties that make it useful in diverse areas. One of them is its connection with operator inequalities related to monotonicity and convexity theorems for the quantum entropy. See Chapter 4 of [15] for a detailed exposition. Another object of interest has been the log Euclidean mean L(A; B) defined as log A + log B L(A; B) = exp : (7) 2 This mean too reduces to A1=2B1=2 when A and B commute, and has been used in various contexts [7], though it lacks some pleasing properties that A#B has. Thus it is natural to consider two more matrix versions of the Hellinger distance, viz, 1=2 d3(A; B) = [tr(A + B) − 2tr(A#B)] ; (8) and 1=2 d4(A; B) = [tr(A + B) − 2trL(A; B)] : (9) In view of what has been discussed, we may expect that d3 and d4 are metrics on P: However, it turns out that neither of them obeys the triangle inequality. Examples are given in Section 2. Nevertheless, this is compensated by the fact that the squares of d3 and d4 both are divergences, and hence they can serve as good distance measures. A smooth function Φ from P × P to the set of nonnegative real numbers, R+ , is called a divergence if (i)Φ( A; B) = 0 if and only if A = B: (ii) The first derivative DΦ with respect to the second variable vanishes on the diagonal; i.e., DΦ(A; X)jX=A = 0: (10) (iii) The second derivative D2Φ is positive on the diagonal; i.e., 2 D Φ(A; X)jX=A(Y; Y ) > 0 for all Hermitian Y: (11) See [4], Sections 1.2 and 1.3. The prototypical example is the Euclidean divergence Φ(A; B) = kA − 2 2 2 Bk2: The functions d1(A; B) and d2(A; B) are also divergences. Another well-known example is the Kullback-Leibler divergence [4]. A special kind 4 RAJENDRA BHATIA, STEPHANE GAUBERT, AND TANVI JAIN of divergence is the Bregman divergence corresponding to a strictly convex differentiable function ' : P ! R: If ' is such a function, then Φ(A; B) = '(A) − '(B) − D'(B)(A − B); (12) is called the Bregman divergence corresponding to ': Not every divergence 2 arises in this way. In particular, dH (p; q); the square of the Hellinger distance, on probability vectors is not a Bregman divergence. Now we describe our main results. We will show that both the functions 2 2 Φ3(A; B) = d3(A; B) and Φ4(A; B) = d4(A; B) are divergences. We will show that Φ3 and Φ4 are jointly convex in the variables A and B; and strictly convex in each of the variables separately. One consequence of this is that for every m -tuple A1;:::;Am in P and positive weights w1; : : : ; wm the minimisation problem m X 2 min wjd (X; Aj) (13) X>0 j=1 has a unique solution when d = d3 or d4: When d = d1 the minimum in (13) is attained at the 1=2 -power mean m !2 X 1=2 Q1=2 = wjAj : (14) j=1 This is one of the much studied family of classical power means. When d = d2; the minimiser in (13) is the Wasserstein mean [2, 18]. This is the unique solution of the matrix equation m X 1=2 1=2 1=2 X = wj(X AjX ) : (15) j=1 This mean has major applications in optimal transport, statistics, quantum information and other areas. Means with respect to various divergences have also been of interest in information theory.
Recommended publications
  • Matrix Analysis (Lecture 1)

    Matrix Analysis (Lecture 1)

    Matrix Analysis (Lecture 1) Yikun Zhang∗ March 29, 2018 Abstract Linear algebra and matrix analysis have long played a fundamen- tal and indispensable role in fields of science. Many modern research projects in applied science rely heavily on the theory of matrix. Mean- while, matrix analysis and its ramifications are active fields for re- search in their own right. In this course, we aim to study some fun- damental topics in matrix theory, such as eigen-pairs and equivalence relations of matrices, scrutinize the proofs of essential results, and dabble in some up-to-date applications of matrix theory. Our lecture will maintain a cohesive organization with the main stream of Horn's book[1] and complement some necessary background knowledge omit- ted by the textbook sporadically. 1 Introduction We begin our lectures with Chapter 1 of Horn's book[1], which focuses on eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and similarity of matrices. In this lecture, we re- view the concepts of eigenvalues and eigenvectors with which we are familiar in linear algebra, and investigate their connections with coefficients of the characteristic polynomial. Here we first outline the main concepts in Chap- ter 1 (Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, and Similarity). ∗School of Mathematics, Sun Yat-sen University 1 Matrix Analysis and its Applications, Spring 2018 (L1) Yikun Zhang 1.1 Change of basis and similarity (Page 39-40, 43) Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over the field F, which can be R, C, or even Z(p) (the integers modulo a specified prime number p), and let the list B1 = fv1; v2; :::; vng be a basis for V.
  • Math 4571 (Advanced Linear Algebra) Lecture #27

    Math 4571 (Advanced Linear Algebra) Lecture #27

    Math 4571 (Advanced Linear Algebra) Lecture #27 Applications of Diagonalization and the Jordan Canonical Form (Part 1): Spectral Mapping and the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem Transition Matrices and Markov Chains The Spectral Theorem for Hermitian Operators This material represents x4.4.1 + x4.4.4 +x4.4.5 from the course notes. Overview In this lecture and the next, we discuss a variety of applications of diagonalization and the Jordan canonical form. This lecture will discuss three essentially unrelated topics: A proof of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem for general matrices Transition matrices and Markov chains, used for modeling iterated changes in systems over time The spectral theorem for Hermitian operators, in which we establish that Hermitian operators (i.e., operators with T ∗ = T ) are diagonalizable In the next lecture, we will discuss another fundamental application: solving systems of linear differential equations. Cayley-Hamilton, I First, we establish the Cayley-Hamilton theorem for arbitrary matrices: Theorem (Cayley-Hamilton) If p(x) is the characteristic polynomial of a matrix A, then p(A) is the zero matrix 0. The same result holds for the characteristic polynomial of a linear operator T : V ! V on a finite-dimensional vector space. Cayley-Hamilton, II Proof: Since the characteristic polynomial of a matrix does not depend on the underlying field of coefficients, we may assume that the characteristic polynomial factors completely over the field (i.e., that all of the eigenvalues of A lie in the field) by replacing the field with its algebraic closure. Then by our results, the Jordan canonical form of A exists.
  • MATH 2370, Practice Problems

    MATH 2370, Practice Problems

    MATH 2370, Practice Problems Kiumars Kaveh Problem: Prove that an n × n complex matrix A is diagonalizable if and only if there is a basis consisting of eigenvectors of A. Problem: Let A : V ! W be a one-to-one linear map between two finite dimensional vector spaces V and W . Show that the dual map A0 : W 0 ! V 0 is surjective. Problem: Determine if the curve 2 2 2 f(x; y) 2 R j x + y + xy = 10g is an ellipse or hyperbola or union of two lines. Problem: Show that if a nilpotent matrix is diagonalizable then it is the zero matrix. Problem: Let P be a permutation matrix. Show that P is diagonalizable. Show that if λ is an eigenvalue of P then for some integer m > 0 we have λm = 1 (i.e. λ is an m-th root of unity). Hint: Note that P m = I for some integer m > 0. Problem: Show that if λ is an eigenvector of an orthogonal matrix A then jλj = 1. n Problem: Take a vector v 2 R and let H be the hyperplane orthogonal n n to v. Let R : R ! R be the reflection with respect to a hyperplane H. Prove that R is a diagonalizable linear map. Problem: Prove that if λ1; λ2 are distinct eigenvalues of a complex matrix A then the intersection of the generalized eigenspaces Eλ1 and Eλ2 is zero (this is part of the Spectral Theorem). 1 Problem: Let H = (hij) be a 2 × 2 Hermitian matrix. Use the Min- imax Principle to show that if λ1 ≤ λ2 are the eigenvalues of H then λ1 ≤ h11 ≤ λ2.
  • A Singularly Valuable Decomposition: the SVD of a Matrix Dan Kalman

    A Singularly Valuable Decomposition: the SVD of a Matrix Dan Kalman

    A Singularly Valuable Decomposition: The SVD of a Matrix Dan Kalman Dan Kalman is an assistant professor at American University in Washington, DC. From 1985 to 1993 he worked as an applied mathematician in the aerospace industry. It was during that period that he first learned about the SVD and its applications. He is very happy to be teaching again and is avidly following all the discussions and presentations about the teaching of linear algebra. Every teacher of linear algebra should be familiar with the matrix singular value deco~??positiolz(or SVD). It has interesting and attractive algebraic properties, and conveys important geometrical and theoretical insights about linear transformations. The close connection between the SVD and the well-known theo1-j~of diagonalization for sylnmetric matrices makes the topic immediately accessible to linear algebra teachers and, indeed, a natural extension of what these teachers already know. At the same time, the SVD has fundamental importance in several different applications of linear algebra. Gilbert Strang was aware of these facts when he introduced the SVD in his now classical text [22, p. 1421, obselving that "it is not nearly as famous as it should be." Golub and Van Loan ascribe a central significance to the SVD in their defini- tive explication of numerical matrix methods [8, p, xivl, stating that "perhaps the most recurring theme in the book is the practical and theoretical value" of the SVD. Additional evidence of the SVD's significance is its central role in a number of re- cent papers in :Matlgenzatics ivlagazine and the Atnericalz Mathematical ilironthly; for example, [2, 3, 17, 231.
  • QUADRATIC FORMS and DEFINITE MATRICES 1.1. Definition of A

    QUADRATIC FORMS and DEFINITE MATRICES 1.1. Definition of A

    QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES 1. DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION OF QUADRATIC FORMS 1.1. Definition of a quadratic form. Let A denote an n x n symmetric matrix with real entries and let x denote an n x 1 column vector. Then Q = x’Ax is said to be a quadratic form. Note that a11 ··· a1n . x1 Q = x´Ax =(x1...xn) . xn an1 ··· ann P a1ixi . =(x1,x2, ··· ,xn) . P anixi 2 (1) = a11x1 + a12x1x2 + ... + a1nx1xn 2 + a21x2x1 + a22x2 + ... + a2nx2xn + ... + ... + ... 2 + an1xnx1 + an2xnx2 + ... + annxn = Pi ≤ j aij xi xj For example, consider the matrix 12 A = 21 and the vector x. Q is given by 0 12x1 Q = x Ax =[x1 x2] 21 x2 x1 =[x1 +2x2 2 x1 + x2 ] x2 2 2 = x1 +2x1 x2 +2x1 x2 + x2 2 2 = x1 +4x1 x2 + x2 1.2. Classification of the quadratic form Q = x0Ax: A quadratic form is said to be: a: negative definite: Q<0 when x =06 b: negative semidefinite: Q ≤ 0 for all x and Q =0for some x =06 c: positive definite: Q>0 when x =06 d: positive semidefinite: Q ≥ 0 for all x and Q = 0 for some x =06 e: indefinite: Q>0 for some x and Q<0 for some other x Date: September 14, 2004. 1 2 QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES Consider as an example the 3x3 diagonal matrix D below and a general 3 element vector x. 100 D = 020 004 The general quadratic form is given by 100 x1 0 Q = x Ax =[x1 x2 x3] 020 x2 004 x3 x1 =[x 2 x 4 x ] x2 1 2 3 x3 2 2 2 = x1 +2x2 +4x3 Note that for any real vector x =06 , that Q will be positive, because the square of any number is positive, the coefficients of the squared terms are positive and the sum of positive numbers is always positive.
  • Arxiv:1805.04488V5 [Math.NA]

    Arxiv:1805.04488V5 [Math.NA]

    GENERALIZED STANDARD TRIPLES FOR ALGEBRAIC LINEARIZATIONS OF MATRIX POLYNOMIALS∗ EUNICE Y. S. CHAN†, ROBERT M. CORLESS‡, AND LEILI RAFIEE SEVYERI§ Abstract. We define generalized standard triples X, Y , and L(z) = zC1 − C0, where L(z) is a linearization of a regular n×n −1 −1 matrix polynomial P (z) ∈ C [z], in order to use the representation X(zC1 − C0) Y = P (z) which holds except when z is an eigenvalue of P . This representation can be used in constructing so-called algebraic linearizations for matrix polynomials of the form H(z) = zA(z)B(z)+ C ∈ Cn×n[z] from generalized standard triples of A(z) and B(z). This can be done even if A(z) and B(z) are expressed in differing polynomial bases. Our main theorem is that X can be expressed using ℓ the coefficients of the expression 1 = Pk=0 ekφk(z) in terms of the relevant polynomial basis. For convenience, we tabulate generalized standard triples for orthogonal polynomial bases, the monomial basis, and Newton interpolational bases; for the Bernstein basis; for Lagrange interpolational bases; and for Hermite interpolational bases. We account for the possibility of common similarity transformations. Key words. Standard triple, regular matrix polynomial, polynomial bases, companion matrix, colleague matrix, comrade matrix, algebraic linearization, linearization of matrix polynomials. AMS subject classifications. 65F15, 15A22, 65D05 1. Introduction. A matrix polynomial P (z) ∈ Fm×n[z] is a polynomial in the variable z with coef- ficients that are m by n matrices with entries from the field F. We will use F = C, the field of complex k numbers, in this paper.
  • Math 623: Matrix Analysis Final Exam Preparation

    Math 623: Matrix Analysis Final Exam Preparation

    Mike O'Sullivan Department of Mathematics San Diego State University Spring 2013 Math 623: Matrix Analysis Final Exam Preparation The final exam has two parts, which I intend to each take one hour. Part one is on the material covered since the last exam: Determinants; normal, Hermitian and positive definite matrices; positive matrices and Perron's theorem. The problems will all be very similar to the ones in my notes, or in the accompanying list. For part two, you will write an essay on what I see as the fundamental theme of the course, the four equivalence relations on matrices: matrix equivalence, similarity, unitary equivalence and unitary similarity (See p. 41 in Horn 2nd Ed. He calls matrix equivalence simply \equivalence."). Imagine you are writing for a fellow master's student. Your goal is to explain to them the key ideas. Matrix equivalence: (1) Define it. (2) Explain the relationship with abstract linear transformations and change of basis. (3) We found a simple set of representatives for the equivalence classes: identify them and sketch the proof. Similarity: (1) Define it. (2) Explain the relationship with abstract linear transformations and change of basis. (3) We found a set of representatives for the equivalence classes using Jordan matrices. State the Jordan theorem. (4) The proof of the Jordan theorem can be broken into two parts: (1) writing the ambient space as a direct sum of generalized eigenspaces, (2) classifying nilpotent matrices. Sketch the proof of each. Explain the role of invariant spaces. Unitary equivalence (1) Define it. (2) Explain the relationship with abstract inner product spaces and change of basis.
  • Math 223 Symmetric and Hermitian Matrices. Richard Anstee an N × N Matrix Q Is Orthogonal If QT = Q−1

    Math 223 Symmetric and Hermitian Matrices. Richard Anstee an N × N Matrix Q Is Orthogonal If QT = Q−1

    Math 223 Symmetric and Hermitian Matrices. Richard Anstee An n × n matrix Q is orthogonal if QT = Q−1. The columns of Q would form an orthonormal basis for Rn. The rows would also form an orthonormal basis for Rn. A matrix A is symmetric if AT = A. Theorem 0.1 Let A be a symmetric n × n matrix of real entries. Then there is an orthogonal matrix Q and a diagonal matrix D so that AQ = QD; i.e. QT AQ = D: Note that the entries of M and D are real. There are various consequences to this result: A symmetric matrix A is diagonalizable A symmetric matrix A has an othonormal basis of eigenvectors. A symmetric matrix A has real eigenvalues. Proof: The proof begins with an appeal to the fundamental theorem of algebra applied to det(A − λI) which asserts that the polynomial factors into linear factors and one of which yields an eigenvalue λ which may not be real. Our second step it to show λ is real. Let x be an eigenvector for λ so that Ax = λx. Again, if λ is not real we must allow for the possibility that x is not a real vector. Let xH = xT denote the conjugate transpose. It applies to matrices as AH = AT . Now xH x ≥ 0 with xH x = 0 if and only if x = 0. We compute xH Ax = xH (λx) = λxH x. Now taking complex conjugates and transpose (xH Ax)H = xH AH x using that (xH )H = x. Then (xH Ax)H = xH Ax = λxH x using AH = A.
  • Numerical Linear Algebra and Matrix Analysis

    Numerical Linear Algebra and Matrix Analysis

    Numerical Linear Algebra and Matrix Analysis Higham, Nicholas J. 2015 MIMS EPrint: 2015.103 Manchester Institute for Mathematical Sciences School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Reports available from: http://eprints.maths.manchester.ac.uk/ And by contacting: The MIMS Secretary School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Manchester, M13 9PL, UK ISSN 1749-9097 1 exploitation of matrix structure (such as sparsity, sym- Numerical Linear Algebra and metry, and definiteness), and the design of algorithms y Matrix Analysis to exploit evolving computer architectures. Nicholas J. Higham Throughout the article, uppercase letters are used for matrices and lower case letters for vectors and scalars. Matrices are ubiquitous in applied mathematics. Matrices and vectors are assumed to be complex, unless ∗ Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and partial dif- otherwise stated, and A = (aji) denotes the conjugate ferential equations (PDEs) are solved numerically by transpose of A = (aij ). An unsubscripted norm k · k finite difference or finite element methods, which lead denotes a general vector norm and the corresponding to systems of linear equations or matrix eigenvalue subordinate matrix norm. Particular norms used here problems. Nonlinear equations and optimization prob- are the 2-norm k · k2 and the Frobenius norm k · kF . lems are typically solved using linear or quadratic The notation “i = 1: n” means that the integer variable models, which again lead to linear systems. i takes on the values 1; 2; : : : ; n. Solving linear systems of equations is an ancient task, undertaken by the Chinese around 1AD, but the study 1 Nonsingularity and Conditioning of matrices per se is relatively recent, originating with Arthur Cayley’s 1858 “A Memoir on the Theory of Matri- Nonsingularity of a matrix is a key requirement in many ces”.
  • MATRICES WHOSE HERMITIAN PART IS POSITIVE DEFINITE Thesis by Charles Royal Johnson in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements Fo

    MATRICES WHOSE HERMITIAN PART IS POSITIVE DEFINITE Thesis by Charles Royal Johnson in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements Fo

    MATRICES WHOSE HERMITIAN PART IS POSITIVE DEFINITE Thesis by Charles Royal Johnson In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 1972 (Submitted March 31, 1972) ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am most thankful to my adviser Professor Olga Taus sky Todd for the inspiration she gave me during my graduate career as well as the painstaking time and effort she lent to this thesis. I am also particularly grateful to Professor Charles De Prima and Professor Ky Fan for the helpful discussions of my work which I had with them at various times. For their financial support of my graduate tenure I wish to thank the National Science Foundation and Ford Foundation as well as the California Institute of Technology. It has been important to me that Caltech has been a most pleasant place to work. I have enjoyed living with the men of Fleming House for two years, and in the Department of Mathematics the faculty members have always been generous with their time and the secretaries pleasant to work around. iii ABSTRACT We are concerned with the class Iln of n><n complex matrices A for which the Hermitian part H(A) = A2A * is positive definite. Various connections are established with other classes such as the stable, D-stable and dominant diagonal matrices. For instance it is proved that if there exist positive diagonal matrices D, E such that DAE is either row dominant or column dominant and has positive diag­ onal entries, then there is a positive diagonal F such that FA E Iln.
  • Package 'Matrixcalc'

    Package 'Matrixcalc'

    Package ‘matrixcalc’ July 28, 2021 Version 1.0-5 Date 2021-07-27 Title Collection of Functions for Matrix Calculations Author Frederick Novomestky <[email protected]> Maintainer S. Thomas Kelly <[email protected]> Depends R (>= 2.0.1) Description A collection of functions to support matrix calculations for probability, econometric and numerical analysis. There are additional functions that are comparable to APL functions which are useful for actuarial models such as pension mathematics. This package is used for teaching and research purposes at the Department of Finance and Risk Engineering, New York University, Polytechnic Institute, Brooklyn, NY 11201. Horn, R.A. (1990) Matrix Analysis. ISBN 978-0521386326. Lancaster, P. (1969) Theory of Matrices. ISBN 978-0124355507. Lay, D.C. (1995) Linear Algebra: And Its Applications. ISBN 978-0201845563. License GPL (>= 2) Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2021-07-28 08:00:02 UTC NeedsCompilation no R topics documented: commutation.matrix . .3 creation.matrix . .4 D.matrix . .5 direct.prod . .6 direct.sum . .7 duplication.matrix . .8 E.matrices . .9 elimination.matrix . 10 entrywise.norm . 11 1 2 R topics documented: fibonacci.matrix . 12 frobenius.matrix . 13 frobenius.norm . 14 frobenius.prod . 15 H.matrices . 17 hadamard.prod . 18 hankel.matrix . 19 hilbert.matrix . 20 hilbert.schmidt.norm . 21 inf.norm . 22 is.diagonal.matrix . 23 is.idempotent.matrix . 24 is.indefinite . 25 is.negative.definite . 26 is.negative.semi.definite . 28 is.non.singular.matrix . 29 is.positive.definite . 31 is.positive.semi.definite . 32 is.singular.matrix . 34 is.skew.symmetric.matrix . 35 is.square.matrix . 36 is.symmetric.matrix .
  • 216 Section 6.1 Chapter 6 Hermitian, Orthogonal, And

    216 Section 6.1 Chapter 6 Hermitian, Orthogonal, And

    216 SECTION 6.1 CHAPTER 6 HERMITIAN, ORTHOGONAL, AND UNITARY OPERATORS In Chapter 4, we saw advantages in using bases consisting of eigenvectors of linear opera- tors in a number of applications. Chapter 5 illustrated the benefit of orthonormal bases. Unfortunately, eigenvectors of linear operators are not usually orthogonal, and vectors in an orthonormal basis are not likely to be eigenvectors of any pertinent linear operator. There are operators, however, for which eigenvectors are orthogonal, and hence it is possible to have a basis that is simultaneously orthonormal and consists of eigenvectors. This chapter introduces some of these operators. 6.1 Hermitian Operators § When the basis for an n-dimensional real, inner product space is orthonormal, the inner product of two vectors u and v can be calculated with formula 5.48. If v not only represents a vector, but also denotes its representation as a column matrix, we can write the inner product as the product of two matrices, one a row matrix and the other a column matrix, (u, v) = uT v. If A is an n n real matrix, the inner product of u and the vector Av is × (u, Av) = uT (Av) = (uT A)v = (AT u)T v = (AT u, v). (6.1) This result, (u, Av) = (AT u, v), (6.2) allows us to move the matrix A from the second term to the first term in the inner product, but it must be replaced by its transpose AT . A similar result can be derived for complex, inner product spaces. When A is a complex matrix, we can use equation 5.50 to write T T T (u, Av) = uT (Av) = (uT A)v = (AT u)T v = A u v = (A u, v).