DOCSLIB.ORG

Deschutes Basin HCP FEIS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COVER SHEET Title of Proposed Action: Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Subject: Final Environmental Impact Statement Lead Agency: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cooperating Agencies: Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Forest Service, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Water Resources Department, Crook County, Deschutes County, Jefferson County County/State: Klamath, Deschutes, Jefferson, Crook, Wasco, and Sherman Counties, Oregon Abstract: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) have received applications for Incidental Take Permits (ITPs) from multiple applicants in Central Oregon in accordance with section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended. The Deschutes Basin Board of Control’s eight member irrigation districts—Arnold, Central Oregon, Lone Pine, North Unit, Ochoco, Swalley, Three Sisters, and Tumalo—and the City of Prineville (collectively, the Applicants) have jointly submitted a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) to both FWS and NMFS to address take of species listed as threatened under ESA from their ongoing water management activities. The Applicants are requesting take of the Oregon spotted frog (Rana pretiosa) and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) from FWS and take of the Middle Columbia River steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and one nonlisted species—sockeye salmon (O. nerka)—from NMFS. FWS, as the federal lead agency, prepared this EIS pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act and its implementing regulations, as well as internal agency guidance. FWS and NMFS will each make separate decisions on whether to issue ITPs to the Applicants, relying on the criteria for ITPs set forth in ESA and its implementing regulations. Key issues include the assessment of the potential for impacts associated with the different alternatives and the corresponding need to offset these impacts on the covered species. For Information, Contact: Bridget Moran, Field Supervisor Bend Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 63095 Deschutes Market Rd Bend, OR 97701 (541) 383-7146 [email protected] FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE DESCHUTES BASIN HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN VOLUME I: CHAPTERS 1–7 OCTOBER 2020 Cover Photo Credits: Crane Prairie Reservoir (top photo), FWS; Crooked River (bottom photo), FWS; bull trout (top inset), Joel Satore; Oregon spotted frog (middle inset), FWS; steelhead trout (bottom inset), Oregon State University Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Proposed Federal Action ................................................................................................ ES-2 ES.3 Purpose and Need for Federal Action ............................................................................ ES-2 ES.4 Public Involvement ........................................................................................................ ES-4 ES.5 Alternatives .................................................................................................................... ES-4 ES.5.1 Alternative 1 – No Action ............................................................................................... ES-4 ES.5.2 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action .................................................................................... ES-5 ES.5.3 Alternative 3 – Enhanced Variable Streamflows ........................................................... ES-6 ES.5.4 Alternative 4 – Enhanced and Accelerated Variable Streamflows ................................ ES-7 ES.6 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................... ES-7 ES.6.1 Scope of Analysis ........................................................................................................... ES-7 ES.6.2 General Approach to Analysis ........................................................................................ ES-8 ES.6.3 Summary of Impact Analysis .......................................................................................... ES-8 Chapter 1 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Proposed Federal Action .................................................................................................. 1-2 1.2.1 Purpose and Need for Federal Action .............................................................................. 1-2 1.3 National Environmental Policy Act .................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.5 Scoping and Public Engagement ...................................................................................... 1-5 1.6 NEPA Cooperating Agencies ............................................................................................ 1-5 1.7 Tribal Consultation ........................................................................................................... 1-6 1.8 Draft EIS Public Comment Period .................................................................................... 1-6 1.9 Changes to the EIS between Draft and Final ................................................................... 1-6 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives ............................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Alternatives Analyzed in the EIS ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Alternative 1: No Action .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Alternative 2: Proposed Action ........................................................................................ 2-7 2.1.3 Alternative 3: Enhanced Variable Streamflows ............................................................. 2-13 2.1.4 Alternative 4: Enhanced and Accelerated Variable Streamflows .................................. 2-15 2.2 Comparison of Alternatives ........................................................................................... 2-18 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Consideration ........................... 2-20 Deschutes River Basin Habitat Conservation Plan October 2020 i Final EIS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Table of Contents 2.3.1 Alternative 1. Accelerated Increases in Upper Deschutes River Fall/Winter Minimum Flows ............................................................................................................. 2-20 2.3.2 Alternative 2. Enhanced Increases in Upper Deschutes River Fall/Winter Minimum Flows and 50-Year Permit Term .................................................................... 2-20 2.3.3 Alternative 5. Modified Upper Deschutes River Fall/Winter Minimum Flows .............. 2-20 2.3.4 Alternative 6. Enhanced Variable Upper Deschutes River Fall/Winter Minimum Flows ............................................................................................................. 2-21 2.3.5 Alternative 7. Variable Deschutes River Fall/Winter Minimum Flows with Reduced Permit Term .................................................................................................... 2-21 2.3.6 Alternative 8. Reduced Covered Species ....................................................................... 2-21 2.3.7 Alternative 9. Limit Covered Activities to Deschutes River ........................................... 2-21 2.3.8 Alternative 10. Continuation of 2017/2018 Fall/Winter Flows on the Upper Deschutes River ............................................................................................................. 2-21 2.3.9 Alternative 11. Deschutes River Flow and Restoration/Enhancement ......................... 2-21 2.3.10 Alternative 12. Flow Enhancement through Conservation, Demand Management, and On-Farm Efficiencies ....................................................................... 2-22 2.3.11 Alternative 13. Reduced Permit Term ........................................................................... 2-22 2.3.12 Alternative 14. Preliminary Injunction Alternative ........................................................ 2-22 2.3.13 Alternative 15. No Take Alternative .............................................................................. 2-22 Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ..................................... 3.1-1 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3.1-1 3.1.1 Alternatives Analyzed ................................................................................................... 3.1-1 3.1.2 Effect Determinations ................................................................................................... 3.1-2 3.1.3 Modeling ......................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Conditions Appendix II

    Environmental Conditions Appendix II

    Environmental Conditions Environmental Conditions Appendix II The unique geology, hydrology and climates of the Deschutes River Subbasin create a diverse mix of habitat conditions for fish and wildlife. These populations are linked to the ecosystems in which they live and their health, individual characteristics and abundance reflect the diversity ― and quality ― of their environments. Fish populations, for instance, developed complex life histories through time that responded to the subbasin’s considerable variation in habitat conditions. Stream flows, water temperatures, substrate characteristics and other combined attributes affected anadromous fish distribution within the subbasin and timing of migration. Wildlife population abundance and distribution also developed in response to habitat conditions. Native grasslands once covered vast areas and supported species such as sage grouse, which once occurred exclusively in this habitat. Loss of grassland habitat greatly reduced such populations. Today subbasin habitat conditions continue to influence fish and wildlife production, distribution and survival. These habitats and their attributes ― as well as the aquatic and terrestrial populations they support ― are affected by both natural watershed processes and human activities that influence flow, water quality, upland and riparian conditions and instream habitat. This chapter examines how environmental conditions in the Deschutes watershed affect the subbasin’s fish and wildlife populations. Building on the more general review provided in the Overview, the discussion characterizes the environmental conditions within three watershed areas: the Lower Deschutes watershed (below RM 100), Crooked River watershed, and Upper Deschutes watershed (above RM 100). It characterizes the natural watershed environments, such as geology, climate and hydrology, and the focal fish species they support.
  • Chapter 5 Supplemental Planning Sections

    Chapter 5 Supplemental Planning Sections

    Chapter 5 Supplemental Sections Planning Section 5.1 Introduction Background This chapter provides material that supplements the other chapters of the Plan. There are no goals or policies in these sections. Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide a glossary, list all acknowledged Goal 5 resources in one location (see Section 2.4) and list all Goal Exceptions and Goal 5 inventories. The final section in this Chapter is a table to track all amendments to this Plan. This table will ensure a clear legislative history is maintained. The following information is covered in this chapter. Glossary and Acronyms (Section 5.2) . Goal 5 Water Resources (Section 5.3) . Goal 5 Wildlife Resources (Section 5.4) . Goal 5 Open Space and Scenic Views and Sites Resources (Section 5.5) . Goal 5 Energy Resources (Section 5.6) . Goal 5 Wilderness, Natural Areas and Recreation Trails (Section 5.7) . Goal 5 Surface Mining Resources (Section 5.8) . Goal 5 Cultural and Historic Resources (Section 5.9) . Goal Exception Statements (Section 5.10) . Goal 5 Adopted Ordinances (Section 5.11) . Ordinance History (Section 5.12) 2 DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.1 INTRODUCTION Section 5.2 Glossary and Acronyms Glossary Note: Terms defined in Deschutes County Code 18.04 (Zoning Code) are not repeated here, but have the same meaning as DCC 18.04. “Agricultural-tourism” or “Agri-tourism” means a commercial enterprise at a working farm or ranch, operated in conjunction with the primary farm or ranch use, conducted for the enjoyment and/or education of visitors, that promotes successful agriculture, generates supplemental income for the owner and complies with Oregon Statute and Rule.
  • Upper Deschutes River Fish Managementplan

    Upper Deschutes River Fish Managementplan

    Upper Deschutes River Fish ManagementPlan Draft May22, 1996 Oregon Department of Fish and Wtldlife Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Page 1 of 431 Upper Deschutes River Basin Fish Management Plan 1996 COMPLETED DISTRICT DRAFT 04/11/96 6:12:58 PM DESCHUTES RIVER from Wickiup Dam to Bend (North Canal Dam) including the tributaries Fall River and Spring River Overview This portion of the basin plan includes the Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam (RM 227) downstream to Bend (North Canal Dam, RM 164.8), Fall River, and Spring River. The Little Deschutes River, a major tributary which enters at RM 193, is not included because of its' length and connection with other waters in the basin. The Little Deschutes River will be presented in a separate section of the basin plan. In the Habitat and Fish Management sections of the following discussion, the Deschutes River will be divided into two sections; Wickiup Dam to Benham Falls (RM 181), and Benham Falls to Bend (North Canal Dam). The reason for this is based on stream morphology and changes in fish populations. Benham Falls is a high gradient natural cascade which separates the Deschutes River into two logical sections with low gradient above the falls and high gradient below. Similarly, fish population composition changes at Benham Falls with brown trout dominant above and rainbow trout dominant below. The remaining sections; location and ownership, fish stocking history, angling regulations, management issues, summary of alternatives and alternatives will be presented as (1) Deschutes River, and (2) Tributaries. In 1987, the Oregon legislature designated the section of Deschutes River from Wickiup Dam to General Patch Bridge, and from Harper Bridge to the north boundary of the Deschutes National Forest as a State Scenic Waterway.
  • Sub Area Umatilla and Walla Walla River Systems , List of Streams �� 24 the Survey� 2 6 Table of Obstructions and Diversions� 39 •

    Sub Area Umatilla and Walla Walla River Systems , List of Streams 24 the Survey 2 6 Table of Obstructions and Diversions 39 •

    United States Department of the Interio r Oscar L . Chapman, Secretary Fish and Wildlife Servic e Albert M. Day, Directo r Special Scientific Report - Fisherie s No. 38 SURVEY OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIE S PART 5 By Reed S . Nielso n Fishery Researoh Biologis t • CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 Part L . Sub-Area Deschutes and John Day River Systems , List of Streams 4 The Survey 5 Table of Obstructions and Diversions 2 0 Part 2 . Sub Area Umatilla and Walla Walla River Systems , List of Streams 24 The Survey 2 6 Table of Obstructions and Diversions 39 • ILLTTS TRATI ONS FIGURE Page 1. Columbia River System 1 2 . Deschutes and John Day River Systems 3 3. Typical smooth-mater section of Desohutes River above Bend, Oregon 8 4. Typical canyon section of Crooked River nea r Terrebonne, Oregon 1 3 5. Diversion dam on the Crooked River, approximatel y 33 miles above the mouth 14 6 . Umatilla and Walla Walla River System 23 • AREA I-Mouth of Cotumbia R. thru Klickitat R.,Wash.. AREA II-Mouth of Columbia R . to Deschutes R .,Oregon . AREAm-Above Klickitat R. to Grand Coulee Dam, Was h AREAM-Deschutes R. to Snake R ., mouth thru Grande. AREA V-Snake R Ronde R . AREAS-Snake R., above Grande Ronde R . thru Payette R . AREAIM-Snake R ., above Payette R. to Upper Salmon Fall s COLUMBIA RIVER SYSTE M S CAL E 40 20 0 50 io o 50 30 10 25 75 125 MILE S • Figure 1. Columbia River System 1 0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Columbia River Stream Survey has been to pro - vide data for the evaluation of each stream, or portion of stream , from the standpoint of its present and potential value in relation t o the maintenance of the salmon resources of the Columbia River .
  • Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path Project Environmental Assessment

    Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path Project Environmental Assessment

    Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path Project Environmental Assessment United States Bend-Fort Rock Ranger District Department of Deschutes National Forest Agriculture Deschutes County, Oregon Forest Service March 2013 Township 19 South, Range 11 East, Sections 16, 17, 20-26 Willamette Meridian For More Information Contact: Scott McBride 63095 Deschutes Market Road Bend, OR 97701 Phone: 541-383-4712 Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path EA The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250- 9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Sunriver to Lava Lands Paved Path EA COMMONLY USED ACRONYMS ABA Architectural Barriers Act AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials BA Biological Assessment BBC Birds of Conservation Concern BE Biological Evaluation BMP Best Management Practices BO Biological Opinion CEQ Council of Environmental Quality CFR Code
  • Comprehensive Plan

    Comprehensive Plan

    Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Preamble, Vision and Use of this Plan iii Chapter1Comprehensive Planning Section 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 Section 1.2 Community Involvement ............................................................................................... 9 Section 1.3 Land Use Planning ........................................................................................................ 13 Primary References ........................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 2 Resource Management Section 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2 Section 2.2 Agricultural Lands ........................................................................................................... 4 Section 2.3 Forest Lands .................................................................................................................. 13 Section 2.4 Goal 5 Overview .......................................................................................................... 18 Section 2.5 Water Resources ......................................................................................................... 21 Section 2.6 Wildlife ..........................................................................................................................
  • Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment August 2003

    Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment August 2003

    Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment August 2003 By Kolleen E. Yake EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment began work in 2002 as a project of the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council. From its inception, the assessment has been a cooperative venture with multiple partners, participants, and advisors. Funding for the project came from grants received from the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. In-kind donations of time, technical assistance, contract services, and equipment were generously contributed to the project by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Deschutes National Forest, the Deschutes Resources Conservancy, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Bureau of Land Management, OSU-Cascades, the Nature Conservancy, the Oregon Water Resources Department, Deschutes County Soil and Water Conservation District, and GeoSpatial Solutions among many others. The purpose of the Upper Deschutes Subbasin Assessment was to gather together existing data and information on all the historic and current conditions that play a role in impacting the watershed health of the subbasin. The details, recommendations, and data gaps discussed within the assessment will assist the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council and other natural resource managers in the area identify key restoration projects and opportunities to enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water quality in the subbasin. By combining all of the existing available information on watershed resources, the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council hopes to raise community awareness about the interconnections and impacts within the whole Upper Deschutes Subbasin system. The key findings and recommendations within the assessment identify and prioritize opportunities for voluntary actions that are directed toward improving fish and wildlife habitat and water quality.
  • NEPA--Environmental Assessment

    NEPA--Environmental Assessment

    Final Environmental Assessment United States Upper Deschutes River Wildland Urban Department of Agriculture Interface Fuel Reduction Project Forest Service Bend-Ft. Rock Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest July 2016 Deschutes County, Oregon Legal Description The project area is comprised of a series of treatment units stretching north from Wickiup Reservoir to the city of Bend. Treatment units are located in the following sections (Willamette Meridian): T18S R11E Section 35 T19S R11E Sections 5,16,20,21, 27, 28, and 31 T20S R11E Sections 6, 29, and 32 T20S R10E Sections 1, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 27, 32, and 35 T20S R9E Section 36 T21S R9E Sections 1, 13, 24, and 36 T21S R10E Section 31 T21S R11E Section 32 T22S R9E Sections 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 T22S R11E Sections 5, 7, 8, 17 and 18 USDA Non-Discrimination Policy Statement DR 4300.003 USDA Equal Opportunity Public Notification Policy (June 2, 2015) In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
  • 2018 Corridor Management and Interpretive Plan

    2018 Corridor Management and Interpretive Plan

    CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AND INTERPRETIVE PLAN 2018 Acknowledgments Thank you to the Federal Highway Administration for funding this project through the National Scenic Byways Program. Thank you also to the America’s Byways Resource Center for their excellent training modules for Corridor Management Planning. Many thanks are also due to the Byway Community Group and to all of the Byway partners and proponents representing community support for the Cascade Lakes National Scenic Byway. Funded in part by Federal Highway Administration Scenic Byway Partners Washanaksha Coalition Warm Springs, Oregon BEND2030 vision builds Crook County Cultural Coalition www.sunriverchamber.com CONTENTS Chapter I: Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................5 Statement of Significance ..........................................................................................................................................5 Vision .....................................................................................................................................................................................5 Description ........................................................................................................................................................................6 Byway History ..................................................................................................................................................................6
  • Chapter 5 Supplemental Sections Section 5.1 Introduction

    Chapter 5 Supplemental Sections Section 5.1 Introduction

    Chapter 5 Supplemental Sections Section 5.1 Introduction Background This chapter provides material that supplements the other chapters of the Plan. There are no goals or policies in these sections. Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide a glossary, list all acknowledged Goal 5 resources in one location (see Section 2.4) and list all Goal Exceptions and Goal 5 inventories. The final section in this Chapter is a table to track all amendments to this Plan. This table will ensure a clear legislative history is maintained. The following information is covered in this chapter. Glossary and Acronyms (Section 5.2) . Goal 5 Water Resources (Section 5.3) . Goal 5 Wildlife Resources (Section 5.4) . Goal 5 Open Space and Scenic Views and Sites Resources (Section 5.5) . Goal 5 Energy Resources (Section 5.6) . Goal 5 Wilderness, Natural Areas and Recreation Trails (Section 5.7) . Goal 5 Surface Mining Resources (Section 5.8) . Goal 5 Cultural and Historic Resources (Section 5.9) . Goal Exception Statements (Section 5.10) . Goal 5 Adopted Ordinances (Section 5.11) . Ordinance History (Section 5.12) 2 DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.1 INTRODUCTION Section 5.2 Glossary and Acronyms Glossary Note: Terms defined in Deschutes County Code 18.04 (Zoning Code) are not repeated here, but have the same meaning as DCC 18.04. “Agricultural-tourism” or “Agri-tourism” means a commercial enterprise at a working farm or ranch, operated in conjunction with the primary farm or ranch use, conducted for the enjoyment and/or education of visitors, that promotes successful agriculture, generates supplemental income for the owner and complies with Oregon Statute and Rule.
  • Physiographic Map of Lava Butte ^ Jefferson Primary Route the Surface of the Earth and the Vegetation and Structures on It

    Physiographic Map of Lava Butte ^ Jefferson Primary Route the Surface of the Earth and the Vegetation and Structures on It

    NE Revere Ave 850000 1080000 1090000 1100000 1110000 ¤£20 850000 Central Oregon Pilot Butte Community Elevation: 4,139 ft. College ¤£20 NW Wall St NE Greenwood Ave NW Newport Ave NE Franklin Ave Chamber of Commerce ^_ 840000 Pilot Butte, named in 1851, is a cinder cone butte that rises nearlyBear Creek 500 Rd feet above the NW Galveston Ave Des Chutes Museum ^_ surrounding plains. It makes Bend one of three cities in the continental U.S. to have an extinct volcano within its city limits. Old Bend 1110000 SW Century Dr Century SW SE 15th St SW Simpson Ave Old Mill District The Old Mill District is a vibrant area of shopping, dining, and entertainment located in the heart of the city. It was originally a massive Brooks-Scanlon sawmill complex that began lumber production in 1916. The mill was open and active until 1994. er iv s R Reed Market Rd ute Desch Broken Top Club 840000 ¤£97 830000 Bend Parkway 1070000 Tetherow Golf Club Bend Golf & Country Club SW Century Dr 830000 China Hat Rd Knott Rd 820000 r e v i R s e t u h c s e D Widgi Golf Club Lost Track Golf Club Baker Lake Seventh Mountain Resort Assuming a paved road 24 feet wide and 6 inches thick, there is enough rock in the 820000 flow to pave 160,000 miles of road. This is equivalent to a paved road circling the world six and a half times. BURLINGTON NORTHERN ¤£97 Lava Island Falls ^_ 810000 Dillon Falls ^_ High Desert The volume of rock in the Lava Butte Lava Flow Museum is 380,000,000 cubic yards.
  • Mountain Bike Trails at Phil's Trailhead

    Mountain Bike Trails at Phil's Trailhead

    9 9 # r T o ig d n Tam McArthur Rim Tr # 4078 i Tam MCarthur Rim Tr # 4078 W - s u i l o t Tam Rim Horse e M Tr. # 4078.1 0 7 3 Mountain Bike Trails at Phil's Trailhead 40 00 65 00 Shevlin Park 6 !B 0 5500 6 460 4 1 0 Mraze 600 k T 460 ra 1 21 il 5500 F a 6000 tor r nnec No rail l 00 6 Highlands Co rth e Mr ek T i 40 90 ade F w az ra 0 0 sc o Mrazek T 6 Ca 550 r e 4 r 0 k to ll 46 ec T T nn r r 0 o a 55 0 Creek 5 Pl C # i Tu lo 2 T l 4 ay A 1 s 2 l m a ra i 000 rea d Sw 5000 00 n 4. 45 la a 2 reek 4 Phil's h U lo C !B ig m ma H p Tu S sca de h ky ly 47 a p i l n C y ll i O O n l i ll L n 0 e U ly i r 550 r a phill on h a ly s R 16 r n e k oa 4 03 1 il d T w v e 46 0 ra o 0 r T ly e M i s 6 e ll Ro ly n i D ylin phi ute ill On O l B 46 4 k U ph 17 ll i T T T S U hi ra l a R r reek Tr # 24 Tumalo Falls p B i rv T M in a C !B U il ra s G e s s i g 5 0 ' G 6 a T 3 a l rid 0 n r B 0 !B Skyliners 1 e r eek Trail K 4 r l T s d 0 o C 3 i B l' l a 0 9 s ' 0 1 a 0 r 0 i 3 e 0 T 24 0 nt h 0 48 m 0 0 e n e V u 5 s 36 K P 6 ge S T hoop t id 3 0 r C W o 5 l 7 T i 4 u B w 00 3 r r e l 55 ll Only o a i 5 hi l n 0 K r a h ek a a i w 6 49 The Tr o 3 d l T rail k a D 25 KGB T i m or i e l " c th F r o Sou ge 000 T n ra KG B 0 Lair p id Tra 0 000 o 0 s City of Bend R il ps 29 5 t T ly 8 0 0 y lo o P ' 14 n 9 4 5 a !0 30 ho hi T s O 3 l e W ' 0 5 L l s il r 18 il 50 0 m h 's Tr a a P 0 28 T ail 1 h il 0 D D u i n a k r 4 0 19 l 11 r Watershed 6 w 0 T 1 a 0 e o o T i l 0 D 4 3 s w l E F i 10 6 0 461 D 550 5 n 4 L l T 00 h a a !0 3 ill Only 4 Private 7 r il