DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 Trade Policy Agenda and 2020 Annual Report of the PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES on the TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021 Trade Policy Agenda and 2020 Annual Report of the PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES on the TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM 2021 Trade Policy Agenda and 2020 Annual Report OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ON THE TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE FOREWORD The 2021 Trade Policy Agenda and 2020 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program are submitted to the Congress pursuant to Section 163 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2213). Chapter IV and Annex III of this document meet the requirements of Sections 122 and 124 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act with respect to the World Trade Organization. The discussion on the Generalized System of Preferences in Chapter II satisfies the reporting requirement contained in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (Pub. L. 115-141, div. M, title V, § 501(c)). This report includes an annex listing trade agreements entered into by the United States since 1984. Goods trade data are for full year 2020. Full-year services data by country are only available through 2019. The Office of the United States Trade Representative is responsible for the preparation of this report and gratefully acknowledges the contributions of all USTR staff to its writing and production. We note, in particular, the contributions of Julie McNees and Spencer Smith. Appreciation is extended to partner Trade Policy Staff Committee agencies. March 2021 LIST OF FREQUENTLY USED ACRONYMS AGOA .......................................................................... African Growth and Opportunity Act APEC ........................................................................... Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation ASEAN ........................................................................ Association of Southeast Asian Nations CAFTA–DR ................................................................. Dominican Republic–Central America–United States Free Trade Agreement CBERA......................................................................... Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act CBI…............................................................................ Caribbean Basin Initiative CVD ............................................................................. Countervailing Duty DOL ............................................................................. U.S. Department of Labor DSB .............................................................................. WTO Dispute Settlement Body DSU ............................................................................. WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding EU1 ............................................................................... European Union FOIA ............................................................................ Freedom of Information Act GATT ........................................................................... General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GATS ........................................................................... General Agreement on Trade in Services GDP ............................................................................. Gross Domestic Product GI ................................................................................. Geographical Indications GPA ............................................................................. WTO Agreement on Government Procurement GSP .............................................................................. Generalized System of Preferences ICTIME ........................................................................ Interagency Center on Trade Implementation, Monitoring, and Enforcement ILO ............................................................................... International Labor Organization IP .................................................................................. Intellectual Property ITA ............................................................................... WTO Information Technology Agreement KORUS ........................................................................ United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement MFN ............................................................................. Most-Favored-Nation MOU ............................................................................ Memorandum of Understanding NAFTA ........................................................................ North American Free Trade Agreement OECD ........................................................................... The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development SBA .............................................................................. U.S. Small Business Administration SME ............................................................................. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise SPS ............................................................................... Sanitary and Phytosanitary TAA ............................................................................. Trade Adjustment Assistance TBT .............................................................................. Technical Barriers to Trade TFA .............................................................................. WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement TIFA ............................................................................. Trade and Investment Framework Agreement TPSC ............................................................................ Trade Policy Staff Committee TRIPS ........................................................................... Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights 1 Unless specified otherwise, all references to the European Union refer to the EU-28. TRQ ............................................................................. Tariff-Rate Quota USAID ......................................................................... U.S. Agency for International Development USDA ........................................................................... U.S. Department of Agriculture USMCA ....................................................................... United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement USTR ........................................................................... United States Trade Representative WTO ............................................................................ World Trade Organization TABLE OF CONTENTS THE PRESIDENT’S 2021 TRADE POLICY AGENDA THE PRESIDENT’S TRADE POLICY AGENDA ..................................................................................... 1 THE 2020 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT ON THE TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM THE 2020 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT ON THE TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. AGREEMENTS AND NEGOTIATIONS ............................................................................................. 1 A. Agreements Notified for Negotiation ................................................................................................... 1 1. United States–European Union Trade Agreement ............................................................................ 1 2. United States–Japan Trade Agreement and United States–Japan Digital Trade Agreement ............ 1 3. United States–Kenya Trade Agreement ............................................................................................ 1 4. United States–United Kingdom Trade Agreement ........................................................................... 2 B. Concluded Agreements ........................................................................................................................ 3 1. United States–China Economic and Trade Agreement ..................................................................... 3 2. United States and European Union Trade Agreement Regarding Tariffs on Certain Products ........ 3 3. United States–Brazil Agreement on Trade and Economic Cooperation ........................................... 3 4. United States–Ecuador Protocol to the Trade and Investment Council Agreement Relating to Trade Rules and Transparency .............................................................................................................. 3 5. United States–Fiji Trade and Investment Framework Agreement .................................................... 4 C. Free Trade Agreements in Force .......................................................................................................... 4 1. Australia ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Bahrain .............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Central America and the Dominican Republic ................................................................................. 5 4. Chile .................................................................................................................................................. 9 5. Colombia ......................................................................................................................................... 10 6. Israel ................................................................................................................................................ 11 7. Jordan .............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The System of Customs and Tariff Regulation of the EAEU in The
    SHS Web of Conferences 9 2, 02047 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219202047 Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020 The system of customs and tariff regulation of the EАEU in the context of globalization: problems, trends and prospects of development Maxim Novikov1,*, and Stella Zemlyanskaya2 1Volgograd Institute of Management, Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Department of Economy and Finance, Gagarin Street, building 8, Volgograd, 400066, Russia 2Volgograd State University, Institute of Economics and Finance, Chair of the Economic Theory, Regional and World Economics, 100 Prospect Universitetsky, Volgograd, 400062, Russia Abstract. Research background: Simplifying the system of foreign trade relations and providing advantages to individual States, allows you to increase the volume of foreign trade turnover and most effectively transform the structure of exports and imports of the country, taking into account its international specialization and competitive advantages. An integral component of the process of globalization is the strengthening of competition between national and foreign producers. In these conditions, it is important for the national economy to achieve a certain balance between protectionist measures and free trade instruments. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this article is to summarize the theoretical and practical experience of using the tools of customs and tariff tools and develop recommendations to improve the efficiency of their application within the EAEU. Methods: The research used methods of generalization, classification and comparative analysis of theoretical and methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of customs tariff instruments and their individual elements, methods of setting scientific hypotheses, grouping research depending on the conclusions and results obtained, and the possibility of using this experience to improve the system of customs and tariff regulation of the EAEU.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents TREATY on the EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION
    Table of contents TREATY ON THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION PART I ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION Section I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union. Legal Personality Article 2 Definitions Section II BASIC PRINCIPLES, OBJECTIVES, COMPETENCE AND LAW OF THE EAEU Article 3 Basic Principles of the EAEU Article 4 Main Objectives of the EAEU Article 5 Competence Article 6 The Law of the EAEU Article 7 International Activity of the EAEU Section III BODIES OF THE EAEU Article 8 Bodies of the EAEU Article 9 Appointments Within the Structural Subdivisions of the Permanent Bodies of the EAEU Article 10 Supreme Council Article11 Procedure of Work of the Supreme Council Article 12 Authorities of the Supreme Council Table of contents Article 13 Decisions and Orders of the Supreme Council Article 14 Intergovernmental Council Article 15 Procedure of Work of the Intergovernmental Council Article 16 Authorities of the Intergovernmental Council Article 17 Decisions and Orders of the Intergovernmental Council Article 18 Commission Article 19 The Court of the EAEU Section IV EAEU BUDGET Article 20 EAEU Budget Article 21 Audit of Financial and Economic Activity of the EAEU bodies Article 22 External Audit (control) PART II CUSTOMS UNION Section V INFORMATION AND STATISTICS Article 23 Information Exchange Within the EAEU Article 24 Official Statistical Information of the EAEU Section VI FUNCTIONING OF THE CUSTOMS UNION Article 25 Principles of Functioning of the Customs Union Table of contents Article 26 Enrollment
    [Show full text]
  • Unrecorded Cross-Border Trade Between Tanzania and Her Neighbors Implications for Food Security
    SD Publication Series Office of Sustainable Development Bureau for Africa Unrecorded Cross-Border Trade Between Tanzania and Her Neighbors Implications for Food Security C. Ackello-Ogutu P. N. Echessah TechnoServe Inc. Technical Paper No. 89 September 1998 This publication is part of the Regional Trade Agenda Series USAID / Africa Bureau Office of Sustainable Development Productive Sector Growth and Environment Division Food Security and Productivity Unit and Regional Economic Development Support Office Eastern and Southern Africa, Office of Agriculture and Natural Resources Activity Title Regional Trade and Comparative Advantage in Eastern and Southern Africa: Implications for Food Security The series includes the following publications: n TradeNet: User’s Guide to InterMail n Comparative Analysis of Economic Reform and Structural Adjustment Programs in East Africa: With Emphasis on Trade Policies n Comparative Analysis of Economic Reform and Structural Adjustment Programs in East Africa: With Emphasis on Trade Policies—ANNEX n Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis in East Africa: Executive Summary n Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis in East Africa: Final Report n Comparative Analysis of Structural Adjustment Policies in Southern Africa: With Emphasis on Agriculture and Trade n Comparative Cost of Production Analysis in East Africa: Implications for Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage n Methodologies for Estimating Informal Cross-Border Trade in Eastern and Southern Africa n Reported Trade in East and Southern Africa:
    [Show full text]
  • Three Approaches to Fixing the World Trade Organization's Appellate
    Institute of International Economic Law Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 [email protected]; http://iielaw.org/ THREE APPROACHES TO FIXING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION’S APPELLATE BODY: THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY? By Jennifer Hillman, Professor, Georgetown University Law Center* The basic rule book for international trade consists of the legal texts agreed to by the countries that set up the World Trade Organization (WTO) along with specific provisions of its predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). At the heart of that rules-based system has been a dispute settlement process by which countries resolve any disputes they have about whether another country has violated those rules or otherwise negated the benefit of the bargain between countries. Now the very existence of that dispute settlement system is threatened by a decision of the Trump Administration to block the appointment of any new members to the dispute settlement system’s highest court, its Appellate Body. Under the WTO rules, the Appellate Body is supposed to be comprised of seven people who serve a four-year term and who may be reappointed once to a second four-year term.1 However, the Appellate Body is now * Jennifer Hillman is a Professor from Practice at Georgetown University in Washington, DC and a Distinguished Senior Fellow of its Institute of International Economic Law. She is a former member of the WTO Appellate Body and a former Ambassador and General Counsel in the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). She would like to thank her research assistant, Archana Subramanian, along with Yuxuan Chen and Ricardo Melendez- Ortiz from the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) for their invaluable assistance with this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Commitments Made Under the Agreement on Agriculture
    Order Code RL32916 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Agriculture in the WTO: Policy Commitments Made Under the Agreement on Agriculture May 12, 2005 Randy Schnepf Specialist in Agricultural Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Agriculture in the WTO: Policy Commitments Made Under the Agreement on Agriculture Summary The Uruguay Round (UR) of multilateral trade negotiations, completed in 1994, represented the first significant step toward reforming international agricultural trade. Under the UR negotiations, domestic policies and trade policies were viewed as interconnected. As a result, WTO member countries committed to disciplines in agricultural support in three broad areas — domestic agricultural support programs, export subsidies, and market access — often referred to as the three pillars of the Agreement on Agriculture (AA). In addition, members also agreed to provisions concerning the handling of sanitary and phytosanitary measures, dispute settlement procedures, and the continuation of the reform process. Under the auspices of the UR’s AA, WTO member countries agreed to limit and reduce the most distortive domestic support subsidies — referred to as amber box subsidies and measured by the Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS) index. Several types of indirect subsidies were identified as causing minimal distortion to agricultural production and trade, and were provided exemptions — green box, blue box, de minimis, and special treatment — from WTO disciplines. Export subsidies were capped and subject to reductions in both value and volume. In addition, members agreed to improve market access for internationally traded agricultural products by converting non-tariff trade barriers (NTBs) into tariffs (a process called tariffication); binding existing tariffs at January 1, 1995, levels; and reducing tariffs from bound levels with the all-product average tariff being reduced faster than tariffs for individual products.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Institute of International Affairs National Conference
    Australian Institute of International Affairs National Conference Australian Foreign Policy: Navigating the New International Disorder Monday 21 November 2016 Hotel Realm Canberra, National Circuit, Barton Arrival 8:30 – 9:00am Australian Foreign Policy 9:00am – 11:00am The Hon Julie Bishop MP (Invited) Minister for Foreign Affairs Julie Bishop is the Minister for Foreign Affairs in Australia's Federal Coalition Government. She is also the Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party and has served as the Member for Curtin since 1998. Minister Bishop was sworn in as Australia's first female Foreign Minister on 18 September 2013 following four years in the role of Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade. She previously served as a Cabinet Minister in the Howard Government as Minister for Education, Science and Training and as the Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Women's Issues. Prior to this, Minister Bishop was Minister for Ageing. Minister Bishop has also served on a number of parliamentary and policy committees including as Chair of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. Before entering Parliament Minister Bishop was a commercial litigation lawyer at Perth firm Clayton Utz, becoming a partner in 1985, and managing partner in 1994. The Hon Kim Beazley AC FAIIA AIIA National President Mr Beazley was elected to the Federal Parliament in 1980 and represented the electorates of Swan (1980-96) and Brand (1996- 2007). Mr Beazley was a Minister in the Hawke and Keating Labor Governments (1983-96) holding, at various times, the portfolios of Defence, Finance, Transport and Communications, Employment Education and Training, Aviation, and Special Minister of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Shopping for Christmas 2016: Retail Prospects
    Shopping for Christmas 2016: Retail Prospects ~ A Research Report for VoucherCodes.co.uk, part of RetailMeNot Report Prepared by Centre for Retail Research Limited, Nottingham September 2016 Research Report Shopping for Christmas 2016 Shopping for Christmas 2016: Retail Prospects ~ A Research Report for VoucherCodes.co.uk, part of RetailMeNot Executive Brief Report. This independent report into the prospects for Holiday or Christmas shopping in 2016 has been commissioned by RetailMeNot, the world’s leading marketplace of digital offers, and carried out by the Centre for Retail Research based in Nottingham, England. Spending on shopping by consumers in the final weeks before Christmas is vital to most retailers’ profitability and many achieve 20% or more of their annual sales in this period. This is only so because, irrespective of background, the Holiday festivities, including celebrations and gift-giving, are an important and traditional part of social and family life. Shopping for Christmas 2016, considers the Holiday/Christmas prospects for retailers and consumers in nine important countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain, UK, the U.S.A. and Canada. Their combined populations are 699.2 million. We estimate that Christmas spending this year will be: £280.991 bn (€323.895 bn) in Europe; £492.246 bn ($635.96 bn) in the U.S.; and £38.470 bn ($49.84 bn) in Canada. The 2016 report has taken account of major shifts in exchange rates and both the 2015 and the 2016 figures are based on current rates of exchange. This is to ensure that changes given in the report reflect only changes in the retail sector, and not currency movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In
    BRIEF BY PROFESSOR FRANÇOIS LAROCQUE RESEARCH CHAIR IN LANGUAGE RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PRESENTED TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES AS PART OF ITS STUDY OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES REFORM PROPOSAL UNVEILED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2021, BY THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AND FRENCH: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES IN CANADA MAY 31, 2021 Professor François Larocque Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Ottawa, ON K1J 6N5 Telephone: 613-562-5800, ext. 3283 Email: [email protected] 1. Thank you very much to the honourable members of the Senate Standing Committee on Official Languages (the “Committee”) for inviting me to testify and submit a brief as part of the study of the official languages reform proposal entitled French and English: Towards a Substantive Equality of Official Languages in Canada (“the reform proposal”). A) The reform proposal includes ambitious and essential measures 2. First, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages for her leadership and vision. It is, in my opinion, the most ambitious official languages reform proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“CA1982”)1 and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”),2 which enshrined the main provisions of the Official Languages Act (“OLA”)3 of 1969 in the Canadian Constitution. The last reform of the OLA was in 1988 and it is past time to modernize it to adapt it to Canada’s linguistic realities and challenges in the 21st century. 3. The Charter and the OLA proclaim that “English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.”4 In reality, however, as reported by Statistics Canada,5 English is dominant everywhere, while French is declining, including in Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • The Product Life Cycle : It's Role in Marketing Strategy/Some Evolving
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANACHAMPAIGN BOOKSTACKS £'*- ^3 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/productlifecycle1304gard BEBR FACULTY WORKING PAPER NO. 1304 The Product Life Cycle: It's Role in Marketing Strategy/Some Evolving Observations About the Life Cycle David M. Gardner College of Commerce and Business Administration Bureau of Economic and Business Research University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign BEBR FACULTY WORKING PAPER NO. 1304 College of Commerce and Business Administration University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign November 1986 The Product Life Cycle: It's Role in Marketing Strategy/ Some Evolving Observations About the Life Cycle David M. Gardner, Professer Department of Business Administration The Product Life Cycle: It's Role In Marketing Strategy- Some Evolving Observations About The Product Life Cycle The Product Life Cycle is an attractive concept, but one which the common consensus is that it has some descriptive value, but rather limited or non-existent prescriptive value. This paper is based on the premise the Product Life Concept has the potential to become a central, if not, the central concept in marketing theory and practice. Prior to making suggestions on steps toward this ambitious goal, the concept is reviewed along with its major limitations. Based on a review of research evidence published since 1975, it is suggested that three areas need to be explored and expanded. The first is a careful reexamination of the foundation of the concept, then there needs to be a focus on the product life cycle as a dependent variable, and third, there is a need from application of meta-theory criteria to guide future research.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada-Renewable Energy: Implications for WTO Law on Green
    October 2014 RFF DP 14-38 PER Canada–Renewable Energy: Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So- Green Subsidies Steve Charnovitz and Carolyn Fischer 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org DISCUSSION PA Canada–Renewable Energy: Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies Steve Charnovitz and Carolyn Fischer Abstract In the first dispute on renewable energy to come to World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement, the domestic content requirement of Ontario’s feed-in tariff was challenged as a discriminatory investment-related measure and as a prohibited import substitution subsidy. The panel and Appellate Body agreed that Canada was violating the GATT and the TRIMS Agreement. But the SCM Article 3 claim by Japan and the European Union remains unadjudicated, because neither tribunal made a finding that the price guaranteed for electricity from renewable sources constitutes a ‘benefit’ pursuant to the SCM Agreement. Although the Appellate Body provides useful guidance to future panels on how the existence of a benefit could be calculated, the most noteworthy aspect of the new jurisprudence is the Appellate Body’s reasoning that delineating the proper market for ‘benefit’ analysis entails respect for the policy choices made by a government. Thus, in this dispute, the proper market is electricity produced only from wind and solar energy. Key Words: feed-in tariff, renewable energy, subsidies, international trade, WTO, green growth, local content requirement JEL Codes: K33, Q48, Q56, Q58 © 2014 Resources for the Future. All rights reserved. No portion of this paper may be reproduced without permission of the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliament
    The Parliament is composed of 3 distinct elements,the Queen1 the Senate and the House of Representatives.2 These 3 elements together characterise the nation as being a constitutional monarchy, a parliamentary democracy and a federation. The Constitution vests in the Parliament the legislative power of the Common- wealth. The legislature is bicameral, which is the term commoniy used to indicate a Par- liament of 2 Houses. Although the Queen is nominally a constituent part of the Parliament the Consti- tution immediately provides that she appoint a Governor-General to be her representa- tive in the Commonwealth.3 The Queen's role is little more than titular as the legislative and executive powers and functions of the Head of State are vested in the Governor- General by virtue of the Constitution4, and by Letters Patent constituting the Office of Governor-General.5 However, while in Australia, the Sovereign has performed duties of the Governor-General in person6, and in the event of the Queen being present to open Parliament, references to the Governor-General in the relevant standing orders7 are to the extent necessary read as references to the Queen.s The Royal Style and Titles Act provides that the Queen shall be known in Australia and its Territories as: Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.* There have been 19 Governors-General of Australia10 since the establishment of the Commonwealth, 6 of whom (including the last 4) have been Australian born. The Letters Patent, of 29 October 1900, constituting the office of Governor- General, 'constitute, order, and declare that there shall be a Governor-General and Commander-in-Chief in and over' the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Relationship Management: a Financial Perspective
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2004 Customer relationship management: A financial perspective Dwain Eldred Lowther Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons Recommended Citation Lowther, Dwain Eldred, "Customer relationship management: A financial perspective" (2004). Theses Digitization Project. 2694. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2694 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT A FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Business Administration by Dwain Eldred Lowther June 2004 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT A FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE A Proj ect Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Dwain Eldred Lowther June 2004 Approved by: C.E. Tapie Xohm,X1 'Ph.Dy, Information & Decision Sciences Information & Decision Patrick S. Mclnturff ,/Ph.D. , Department Chair, Management ABSTRACT In an era of increasing competition in the financial services industry, it is imperative that strategic planners, operations personnel and line employees have at their disposal the ability to.call upon information not only about groups of customers, but specific individual customers as well. Providing this sort of analysis at the customer level with any degree of precision requires a great deal of information, and the wherewithal to collect and collate that 'information in a way that can be made easily accessible to the lay or unsophisticated reader.
    [Show full text]