THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017
THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 THE ADDIS ABABA WE WANT © United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), 2017 All rights reserved United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN- Habitat) PO Box 30030, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 2 621 234 Fax: +254 2 624 266 www.unhabitat.org
HS Number: HS/033/17E ISBN Number (Series): 978-92-1-133397-8 ISBN Number (Volume): 978-92-1-132745-8
Design and Layout by MJS Colourspace Ltd. Nairobi, Kenya.
Front cover photo: © Dereje /Shutterstock
DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or regarding its economic system or degree of development. The analysis, conclusions and recommendations of the report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme, the Governing Council of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme or its Member States. THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 THE ADDIS ABABA WE WANT FOREWORD BY UN-HABITAT
t gives me great pleasure to introduce the State of Addis recommendations for building an Addis Ababa that can serve as Ababa 2017 Report – the first of its kind to provide a an engine of prosperity, as well as a centre of cultural and social comprehensive assessment of existing socio-economic and well-being, while protecting the environment. Ienvironmental conditions in the city and to provide evidence- UN-Habitat, the leading UN programme on sustainable based policy recommendations for achieving more sustainable urbanization with more than forty years of expertise and as a pathways of development. focal point for sustainable urbanization and human settlements The report is very timely, given Ethiopia’s ongoing rapid in collaboration with other United Nations entities, is committed urbanization and the growing economic, social and spatial to support Ethiopia’s sustainable urban development process. transformations of the last two decades. Both the federal government and Addis Ababa’s city administration have made significant progress in improving economic and social conditions for residents of Addis Ababa. At the same time, challenges remain for Addis Ababa to become a more inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable city in line with the Sustainable Development Goal 11. Notably, urbanization has caused increasing pressure on the city’s capacity for affordable and adequate housing, employment, and access to basic services, particularly for the most poor and vulnerable. Addis Ababa will also face additional challenges in facilitating access to housing and land, while ensuring that social networks are not lost, and addressing the growing desire of the citizens of Addis Ababa to participate in decision-making processes. These issues are explored in-depth in the report, which are presented in the context of the New Urban Agenda, the outcome Dr. Joan Clos document of Habitat III, and its avenues of implementation Under-Secretary General of the United Nations by local authorities. It thereby provides tangible and practical Executive Director UN-Habitat THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 OF ADDIS ABABA THE STATE ii FOREWORD BY THE ADDIS ABABA CITY ADMINISTRATION
he African Union Agenda 2063 spells out the of Understanding between the City of Addis Ababa and UN- aspirations to be a prosperous continent, with the Habitat who have agreed to collaborate in initiatives that make means and resources to drive its own development, with the city prosperous and liveable –socially inclusive, economically Tsustainable and long-term stewardship of its resources. Structural vibrant, environmentally sustainable and well managed. transformation is a necessary condition to translate the region’s The report is a result of a commendable effort of UN-Habitat recent impressive economic growth rates into inclusive and to undertake in-depth data collection and analysis that give an sustainable development. The agenda’s realization is strongly overview of the current state of the city pertaining to spatial, linked to the way urbanization is managed, as cities are hubs of socio-economic and environmental issues. cultural and economic activities, and Africa is urbanizing rapidly, The city administration is determined to guide the growth projected to becoming predominantly urban within the next of Addis Ababa towards a more sustainable path. I trust that 20 years. this report will provide both the information and inspiration In Ethiopia, the recognition of the “urban” potential for needed to continue transforming Addis Ababa into a role model economic transformation translated into the National Urban for managing the rapid urbanization to unlock its potential for Development Policy of 2005, and further into the Second Growth structural transformation in Africa. and Transformation plan (GTP II). GTP II aims to transform Ethiopia into an industrialised middle-income country by 2025 and mainstreams the sustainable development goals (SDGs), while pursuing the strategy of fostering the governance and management of rapid urbanization to accelerate economic growth. Urban development strategies such as increased investment to improve urban infrastructure, housing development and job creation through the engaging the youth demonstrate the commitment of the city government to transform Addis Ababa THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 as a hub of innovation, economic production, and as a culturally diverse and environmentally sustainable capital city. I am therefore pleased to introduce the State of Addis Ababa Diriba Kuma 2017 report, which has been prepared under a Memorandum Mayor of Addis Ababa
iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This report was prepared under the leadership of Dr. Mathias Spaliviero, Senior Human Settlement Officer at UN-Habitat. He was assisted by Prof. Fantu Cheru, Senior Researcher, African Studies Centre, Leiden University, and Senior Advisor to the UN-Habitat Ethiopia country office. The research team was composed of experts from social, economics, and urban environment backgrounds. The core team that undertook the research and drafted the report comprised Dr. Meseret Kassahun, Assistant Professor, School of Social Work, College of Social Science, Addis Ababa University; Dr. Belay File, Assistant Professor of Development Economics and Urban Development Expert, Department of Development Economics, Ethiopian Civil Service University; Marjan Kloosterboer, M.Sc, PhD Student at the University of Glasgow in Urban Studies; and Dr. Linda Zardo, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Italy. Aklilu Fikreselassie, Habitat Programme Manager Ethiopia at UN-Habitat, played a crucial role in coordinating the research process and providing relevant contextual feedback.
UN-Habitat is grateful for the generous financial support provided by the Sweden Embassy in Ethiopia towards the field research as well as in the final production of the State of Addis Ababa 2017 report. Similarly, UN-Habitat also acknowledges the tremendous political and technical support received from the Addis Ababa City Administration throughout the process.
The report was reviewed and edited by Prof. Fantu Cheru and Dr. Joseph Maseland, Human Settlements Officer at UN-Habitat, in close coordination with Katharina Rochell, International Consultant, Regional Office for Africa, UN-Habitat, who was also responsible for proofreading and the overall coordination of the production of the report with the assistance of Jessica Mundia, Intern in the Programme Division at UN-Habitat. Marcia Guambe, Urban Planning and Mapping Analyst at UN-Habitat in Mozambique, was responsible for providing GIS support and producing maps for this report.
This study could not have been completed without the dedication and contribution of Ato Demissie Damite and Abebaw Getachew who provided statistical support. The research team is further grateful for the research assistants Milki Getachew, Serawit Umar, Bethelhem Aschalew and Saada Ali. UN-Habitat would like to thank Mr. Geo Kalev for the courtesy of providing his photographs to illustrate this report.
The report also benefitted from the contribution of experts from the City Government of Addis Ababa Renewal Agency, the Addis Ababa Bureau of Finance and Economic Development, as well as from the Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development, the Consortium of Christian Relief & Development Associations, Cordaid, as well as the Ethiopian Cities Association.
Finally and importantly, the contribution of renewal induced relocatees and condominium housing unit owners was absolutely crucial to this report. THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 OF ADDIS ABABA THE STATE iv CONTENTS
Executive summary...... 1 FIGURES Introduction...... 3 Figure 1: Growth rate of Addis Ababa...... 12 1 Addis Ababa’s evolution and governance structure...... 6 Figure 2: Share of the key economic sectors, Addis Ababa, 1.1 The evolution of Addis babaA until 1935...... 7 2011-2015...... 19 1.2 Urban planning in Addis Ababa...... 8 Figure 3: Sectoral composition of urban employment...... 19 1.3 Land and housing policy in Addis Ababa...... 9 Figure 4: Per capita income trends over time...... 20 1.4 Addis Ababa today: Population and Figure 5: High PCI growth scenario 2011-2025, in USD...... 21 demographic characteristics...... 11 Figure 7: Modest PCI growth scenario, 2011-2025, in USD...... 21 1.5 The governance structure of Addis Ababa...... 13 Figure 6: Low PCI growth scenario 2011-2025, in USD...... 21 Figure 8: Various PCI scenarios for the city of Addis Ababa...... 21 2 The economic role of Addis babaA ...... 16 Figure 9: Addis Ababa’s employment by major 2.1 The economic role of Addis babaA ...... 17 occupational group...... 23 2.2 Addis Ababa city productivity...... 18 Figure 10: Urban unemployment by major occupation...... 23 2.3 Labour markets...... 22 Figure 11: Addis Ababa’s major occupation out of total 2.4 Municipal finance and land value capture...... 27 employment by gender (2015)...... 23 2.5 Revenue structure and performance...... 28 Figure 12: Employed population by status in employment...... 24 2.6 Land value capture: challenges and opportunities...... 33 Figure 13: Addis Ababa's unemployment trend...... 24 2.7 Competitiveness and drivers of economic growth...... 35 Figure 14: Share of major revenue sources...... 28 2.8 Foreign direct investment...... 36 Figure 15: The share of municipal revenue during GTP period...... 30 2.9 Enabling business environment and city competitiveness...... 37 Figure 16: Addis Ababa city revenue per capita in ETB...... 30 Figure 17: Share of various expenditure components in Addis Ababa in 3 Housing to the poor...... 46 total expenditure...... 31 3.1 Urban planning, land and housing policies under the EPRDF Figure 18: Share of municipality revenue to total expenditure ...... 31 since 1991...... 47 Figure 19: Per capita expenditure in ETB...... 32 3.2 Housing affordability...... 51 Figure 20: Recurrent vs. Capital expenditure (in ETB millions)...... 32 3.3 Affordability of mortgage ...... 53 Figure 21: Proportion of MSE jobs created by major sectors, 3.4 Relocation, compensations, and the socio-economic 2011-2015 ...... 35 impacts of relocation...... 54 Figure 22: Perception of housing affordability ...... 51 3.5 Accessibility and affordability of basic services...... 60 Figure 23: Mortgage payment defaults ...... 52 3.6 The urban renewal program's socio-economic impacts on Figure 24: Main sources of housing finance ...... 54 relocatees ...... 65 Figure 25: Inner-city land expropriation by sub-city (hectare) ...... 55 Figure 26: Number of households evicted from 2009-2013 4 The urban environment...... 72 by neighbourhood ...... 55 4.1 Growth, resources and equitable well-being...... 73 Figure 27: Satisfaction on justification on relocation and 4.2 The city we want...... 78 compensation ...... 56 4.3 Strategies and policies...... 80 Figure 28: Number of households compensated ...... 57 4.4 Basic services, environment and public health...... 82 Figure 29: Water service dependability ...... 61 4.5 Towards a climate resilient Addis Ababa...... 86 Figure 30: Electric service dependability...... 61 4.6 Conclusions and future directions...... 87 Figure 31: Service satisfaction level ...... 64 Figure 32: Loss perceptions due to relocation ...... 66 5 Conclusions, recommendations and way forward: Figure 33: Prior membership in social organizations...... 68 the Addis Ababa we want...... 90 Figure 34: Formal social support extended to relocatees...... 69 5.1 Improve the urban economy and business environment...... 92 Figure 35: Land-cover Addis Ababa 1999...... 74 5.2 Improve regional planning ...... 93 Figure 36: Land-cover Addis Ababa 2014...... 74 5.3 Increase access to housing...... 94 Figure 37: Ecosystem services supply in Addis Ababa per sector ...... 75 5.4 Improve urban governance and basic services delivery...... 95 Figure 38: Total ecosystem services supply in Addis Ababa...... 76 5.5 Tackle critical environmental issues and improve Figure 39: Ecosystem services supply and demand per subcity...... 77 urban planning and design...... 96 Figure 40: Examples of new ecosystems for the city ...... 80 5.6 Conclusions...... 97 Figure 41: Inter-linkages between basic services and a clean environment ...... 83 1 THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 T Executive summary liveability, productivity, competitiveness andsustainability. environment. It provides recommendations toenhancethecity’s delivery, accesstoaffordable housingforthepoorand theurban urbanization onitseconomicdevelopment, socialservices the report shedslightontheimpactsofAddis Ababa’s ongoing urban governance structure, systemandpractices.Specifically, economic and environmental conditions within the city’s dynamic perspective. Amore is polycentric urbansystemof the country by Addis Ababa needstobetackled from aregional planning in thecurrent governance structure ofAddis Ababa. weak stateofurbanplanningandpoorimplementation capacity mega challengesthatcannotbe solved overnight, consideringthe role ofcitizens ininfluencingpublicpolicydecisions. These are environment and quality of life; and urban governance and the accessibility and affordability the urban of basic urban services; economy andjobs;urbanrenewal andhousingthepoor; solutions forimprovement. It covers five thematicareas: urban in Addis Ababa andtoofferplausible recommendations and inmanagingtherapidpaceofurbanization and opportunities about asaresult oftherapidandunplanned urbanization. report highlightssocial,economic,andspatialchallengesbrought not beinterpreted atfacevalue thatalliswell inAddis Ababa. The being fullyrealized. Thesepositive developments should,however, making isseriouslybeingdebatedthoughprogress isfarfrom a scaleneeded;anattempttoengagecitizens more indecision- such aswaterandelectricityisimprovingservices though notat aided by federally funded mega projects; the provision of basic mushrooming; fiscalinfrastructure hasimproved dramatically, manufacturingfirms dramatic. Theeconomyisbooming;new are of Addis Ababa over the past fifteen years has been more than ensure consistency, credibility andreliability ofthefindings. comparison and triangulation by data source has been applied to and evidence-basedfindings. In the overall draftingprocess, cross- critically reviewed literature and is presented as a set of coherent c. b. a. This isbasedonextensive report research, including: At thenationallevel, therapidurbanizationprocess experienced This isthefirstofitskindthattriestocapturereport thechallenges Indeed, theeconomic,socialandspatialtransformation The quantitative and qualitative data has been integrated with
Secondary datafr Secondary administration; and Intervie urban renewal strategyand992condominiumwinners; former innercityresidents relocated ofamassive aspart inv A survey the CentralStatistical Agency(CSA). urbanization processes vis-à-vis assessment of thecity’s historical, demographic and he State ofAddis Ababa 2017report presents acritical ws with key officials from the Addis Ababa city olving 1,315individualsoutofwhich323 om citygovernment and departments its current socio- show living incondominium thatoutof1,315studyparticipants residents withincomes below thepoverty line.Survey results the housingoffered isnotaffordable tothe20%ofcity’s however, have beenrendered lesseffective thananticipatedas urban environment through slumreduction. Theseefforts, increasing thecity’s housingstockandimproving thephysical The production ofcondominiumhousing hasbeensuccessfulin affordable housingfor itslow- andmiddle-income residents. foreign investments by improving thebusinessenvironment. resource mobilization,includingattractingmore domesticand improving taxcollection,butalsoby exploringotherformsof city and moderninfrastructure, the demand forbetterservices municipal revenue overtime. decliningfurther With growing far too heavily on state revenues and grants, with the share of public expenditures. Thecity’s current publicexpenditure relies challenges inraisingthemunicipal(own) revenue tofinanceits urban economicactivity. Evidence shows that thecityfacescritical particular, thatwouldgenerateemployment opportunities. competitive inorder toattractinvestment, manufacturingin economy needstotransformsignificantlyandbecomemore rates thanthenationalaverage. It isimperative thatAddis Ababa’s Ababa, therefore, registers persistentlyhigherunemployment broad spread fordifferent ofjobopportunities skilllevels. Addis Consequently, theurbaneconomydoesnotofferasufficiently in producing broad-based inclusive sustainableeconomicgrowth. development, ithasyet todemonstratethepotentialofMSEs development through micro andsmallenterprise(MSE) government toenhancelocaleconomic hastakensignificanteffort slow thoughimproving inthepastfive years. Although thecity dominant whilethepaceofmanufacturinggrowth hasremained sectorremains the economicbaseofcapital,service the federalgovernment andthecityadministrationtodiversify experienced rapideconomicdevelopment. of Despite theefforts current primacy. attractiveness, providing valid alternatives to Addis Ababa’s the nationalterritory, withtherequired andfactorsof services investments, andtoestablishasystemofcitiesablesustain their implementation through well-coordinatedand support develop and implementnationalandregional spatialplans corridors. Bothfederal and regional governments are urgedto andinter-linkedthrough development/transportation country urban centres andpolesofattractionwell-distributed across the establishing asystemofcitiescomposeddifferent important investment, businessesandpopulationinAddis Ababa, by recommended, henceavoiding theover-concentration ofcapital The cityhasalsomadehugeinvestments insubsidisedand Addis Ababa’s revenue raising capacityneedstobettermatchthe Over the past twenty years in particular, Addis Ababa has must enhanceitsrevenue generationcapacity, notonlyby THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 2 Although the city administration has adopted environmental environmental adopted has administration city the Although international other and Union African the of seat the as Finally, urban governance improving commitment towards The city’s pollution mitigation, run-off regulation and the provisioning of the provisioning regulation and run-offmitigation, pollution negatively This in turn triggers costs while impacting clean water. Neighbourhoods residents. Ababa Addis of the on the wellbeing the least vulnerable communities have more accommodating the ecosystem. and the benefits of an adequate areas access to green action translating these into practical policies and regulations, capacity technical and financial to due challenge a proven has institutional awareness need to create is dire constraints. There implementing for better and regulations policies on existing and climate strategies to tackle pollution, waste management, change mitigation and adaptation. is limitless. economic future Ababa’s organizations, Addis global for the capital city to become a premiere in order However, urban At present, overcome. be deficit must the governance city, and sometimes inappropriate heavily suffers from governance institutional capacity for corrupt as weak even practices as well urban as areas such critical in the case is especially This planning. land, basic urban services attack on housing. Any frontal and determined and nepotism will require corruption, rent-seeking procurement flawed of tightening the leadership, political collection, besides practices, computerization of revenue individuals of rule the of prosecution and law of enforcement in those bad practices. Corruption is one of the main involved extension, by and, environment business conducive a to deterrents flows. investment direct to attracting domestic and foreign has administration the past decade, the city is genuine. Over as well structural various and institutional reforms introduced and competence the enhance to initiatives building capacity as servicesin institutions municipal of delivery responsiveness and tape that frustrates business operators red bureaucratic to reduce as on the same as well progress measure To alike. and citizens should establish a system Ababa Addis satisfaction levels, citizens’ for annual feedback on services delivery for each sub-city of in government federal effort the by current The Ababa. Addis is very and the city much welcome, and renewal’ reform ‘deep effortsstrengthen to administration must build on these current and to enhance transparency institutional and planning capacity, of government the responsiveness and to improve accountability, These undertakings institutions to the demands of the citizenry. the space for can be successful if the city administration broadens participationcitizens in decision-making. per year. The scarce The scarce per year. 2 which has a huge impact on public health urban environment With respect to solid waste, the city administration will need respect With and the urban ecosystem in particular areas green Ababa’s Addis Likewise the existing housing strategy should be reviewed Likewise should be reviewed the existing housing strategy case of expanding basic services In to the population, the picture has been urban growth The one victim of rapid and unplanned to introduce best practices such as waste separation, compost to introduce pollution water Moreover, re-use. and recycling production, discharges from controlling and regulating needs to be tackled by could be both houses and factories. Communities themselves and river mobilised for monitoring activities to preserve the river banks. that the built show Trends desirable standards. far below remain at a speed of 4-5 km increasing are up areas as well. Air and water pollution are exceeding acceptable standards acceptable standards exceeding Air and water pollution are as well. consequences for the health of the city residents. with negative of air and water pollution include the use of The major sources for cooking and heating purposes old cars, the use of charcoal sewage as the lack of proper and dryas well waste management. While the challenge of air pollution is huge, the city needs to existing legislation rather enforcing pollution by better regulate of new than the introduction regulations. for incorporating a wider range of options beyond ownership ownership beyond for incorporating a wider range of options housing, housing of condominium housing units (i.e. rental to expand affordable etc.) and upgrading, housing cooperatives, housing finance. services Although access to health and education is mixed. has involved two sectors have since these improved increasingly challenge, huge a remains quality improving sector, private the particularly former inner-city residents in new settlements where Likewise with mobility: despite continuous been relocated. have better transportation to promote effortsby the city government first Light Rail servicesof Ethiopia’s including introduction transportation and access to efficient and affordable Train, with high transaction cost and problematic mobility remains particularly residents, to the majority of the city’s inconvenience under the urban renewal to peri-urban zones for those relocated programme. the housing, 41% are spending more than 30% of their household than 30% spending more housing, 41% are of costs, illustrating the lack of affordability income on housing compensation addition, In strategy to the poor. this (re)housing inner be unfair by found to are mechanisms and regulations into the implementation fails to take city landholders as while determining compensation. values consideration market reflect true insufficiently calculations cost Likewise,replacement and upgrading urban that here noted is constructionIt costs. wholesale on deciding before explored be to need densification as a final option. and relocation demolition, renewal green areas and poor ecosystem in the city negatively affect and poor ecosystem in the city negatively areas green 3 THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 E Introduction annually (World Bank, 2015) the rateofurbanizationisexpectedtoaccelerateatabout 5% at 19%,low even by sub-Saharan Africanstandards. However, 2015). Thelevel ofurbanizationin Ethiopia currently stands rate of3.8%annually, isexpectedto tripleby 2037(World Bank, 4.87 to11.86millionbetween 1984and2007and,growing ata However, Ethiopia’s urbanpopulationmore thandoubledfrom statistical abstract,themajorityofEthiopians reside areas. inrural level. However, sincetheearly2000s, attention hasshiftedtowards has beenacritical factorinthecountry’s current low urbanization rural predispositionprogramme. Thishistoric towards agriculture the Agricultural Development-led Industrialization (ADLI) agriculture development undertheumbrella andrural of Ethiopia’s development policywasheavilybiasedtowards Until recently low andgiven itsvery level ofurbanisation, The physicaltransformationofAddisAbaba.©GeoKalev ▲ Agency (CSA),2014).According totheCSA's2014annual an estimatedpopulationof90million(CentralStatistics inAfrica,has thiopia, thesecond-mostpopulouscountry 1 . exchange. toenabling Thiswithaview Ethiopian cities tobetter environments andbecoming nodesofinnovation andeconomic Ethiopian cities’ economies towards providing betterbusiness demonstrate thegovernment’s commitment totransforming Expansion ofurbaninfrastructure investments inparticular have significantlycontributedtosubsequent economicgrowth. Bank, 2015). towards and,toalesserextent,manufacturing(World services sectors’ contributiontotheGDP–awayfrom agriculture the Ethiopian economy, resulting inanoticeable shiftineconomic ialization hassignificantlycontributedtorapidtransformation of (MOFEC) 2015). of (Ministry efforts Finance and Economic Cooperation and industrialisationatthecentre ofnationaldevelopment urban development policyin2005whichputsurbanization country’ statusby 2025.Thegovernment adoptedafirstnational industrialization as Ethiopia strives to achieving ‘middle-income This majorpolicyshifttowards urbanizationandindustr-
High publicinvestments ininfrastructure projects
THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 4 ▲ 2013: Streets of Addis Ababa. © Shutterstock report consists of five sections. of five consists report 2017 Ababa Addis of State . 2 As part of the government’s ambitious plan to achieve ‘middle- to achieve plan ambitious As part government’s of the symbolic significance of the ongoing the actual and Despite This Ababa’s Addis of to analyses The second section is devoted made by discusses the challenges and the progress three Section alarming rate of Ababa’s Addis The fourthdiscusses section actionable report and presents concludes the five Section income country’ status by 2025, Addis Ababa has benefited from has benefited from Ababa Addis 2025, status by income country’ and urban renewal the past decade. Massive over huge investments its underway are the city to improve projects across redevelopment location, to tackle the huge backlog as a business competitiveness housing and basic servicein affordable delivery accelerated through As a housing programs. and public in infrastructure investment has experienced Ababa interventions,of these state Addis result domestic and economic dynamism, attracting both tremendous economic other and creation job generate that investments foreign opportunities. both the spatial and urbanization that is significantly changing empirical data is reliable Ababa, economic landscapes of Addis it is not always possible to understand and lacking. Consequently, and transformation of the growth of recent quantify the drivers and social impacts. city and their socio-economic, environmental at is aimed 2017 report Ababa of Addis State the current Hence, assessment of existing socio- comprehensive a more providing the city and what the conditions in economic and environmental opportunitiescity could do to better tap into the economic and and global levels. potentials at the national, regional of the city in the late presents the historic development The first demographic and 19th century as its current as well to the present characteristics. governance productivity the city’s critically reviewing economic characteristics by further section second The the highlights competitiveness. and to enhance challenges and opportunities capture of land value that could be measures and other promising municipal revenues, condition, including attracting fiscal the city’s pursued to improve investment. direct and better domestic and foreign both more One key housing. affordable the city administration in providing renewal city urban inner is housing strategy present of the aspect to newly-built condominium housing. of residents and relocation supported the inner city by are programs While these renewal with challenges, including has been fraught the process residents, land or replacement whether through the compensation offered, many relocatees condominium units, that has been contested by alike. and land owners While the city administration has degradation. environmental translating these guidelines and regulations, environmental adopted problematic be to shown action has strategic and practical into This section also due to lack of institutional and human capacity. with basic urban highlights the connectedness of the environment as mitigation and adaptation mechanisms as well service provision change on the wellbeing impacts of climate the negative to reduce of the inhabitants. covered. for each of the thematic areas recommendations access and exploit opportunitiesaccess and (Ministry of the global economy and Construction (MOUDCo) Housing Development, of Urban 2014)
ADDIS ABABA’S EVOLUTION AND GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
ddis Ababa was established in the late 19th century and in comparison to other capital cities it is relatively young. Addis Ababa has evolved from a smallA rural settlement up to the 1950s into a vibrant modern metropolis today. Much of this urban transformation began during the period of Imperial Rule but accelerated in the post-1991 era. This section discusses and reviews the planning approaches over time and under successive regimes, and how these have collectively shaped today’s socio-economic and spatial characteristics of the city.
▲ Old and new Addis Ababa. © Geo Kalev 7 THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 1.1 I as ‘Taitu’s eramasterplan’, thatguidedcitydevelopment until an informalmasterplanledby Emperess Taitu, oftenreferrred planning practices.However, historiansbelieve thatthere existed Tufa, 2008) were believed topossesscurative powers (Pankhurst, 1961; the royal couplewasattracted totheFilowa hotspringswhich and defensive position,andancestralhistory. It isallegedthat area land,mildclimate,geographicallystrategic foritsfertile
101 Sketch ofTaitu's eramasterplan(Mahiteme,2007). ▲ allotted landindifferent partsofthecity wereresponsibleforadministering and administration wasnecessary tomaintain 1910, thepopulation ofthe citywas estimated tobe 65,000.Accordingly, acivil as the population of the city started to grow due to political and After 1896,the administration of AddisAbab of eachchiefandthenumbersubordinatesthey had. or loyalty to the king. The size of the plot is Proximity tothepalaceshows eithertherole political hierarchies, which showtherole of local chief inthe politicalsystem. during the time of Menelik. The settlements were the spatial projections of socio- organization ofthecitywashi clustered villages(Fig.1).From Taytu’ssketch, it is evident that the spatial existing socio-political set-up gave the city’s landusepatterntheappearance of conflicts betweenlandowners. This early between the settlements wasleft intentiona P Æ ¹ ¹ ‘New Flower’ inEnglish). Theemperor selectedthe Finfinne Taitu foundedtheCityofAddis Ababa (Addis Ababa means n late19 ²³ of Addis Ababa today of AddisAbaba Administrative boundary stream ²³ road
School Hospital ²³ ²³ Mule house Mule Workshop servants palace for Residence centre Commercial house Livestock Palace 0.5 ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ Local chiefs' residential areas residential chiefs' Local Addis Ababauntil1935 The evolution of ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ 3 th ²³ . Addis Ababa evolved organicallywithoutformal ²³ century, Emperor Menelik IIandhiswifeEmperess ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ km ²³ Fig. 1 Earlysettlements of Addis Ababa. ²³
ghly influencedbythepolitic ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³ ²³
²³ ²³ concept of space and its utilization by the rules and regulations. Chiefs who were rules and regulations. Chiefs who were s ofthechiefinpalaceadministration also an important indicator of the power alsoanimportant indicatorofthepower ²³ ²³ the Italian occupationofEthiopia in1935(Mahiteme, 2007) capital city(Mahiteme, 2007; Tufa, 2008) proximity toeachother, ratherthanastrong centralcore and campsurrounded villagesclustered by rural inclose of amilitary organization ofthecityinitiallyreflected thetraditional layout market (Arada) andthechurch (St. Georgis). Thesocio-spatial economic and cultural nodes: the imperial palace (the Gebbi), the A multicentred settlementspawledaround three mainpolitical, lasted well intothe1960s. reign ofEmperor Menelik. Addis Ababa’s characteristics rural duringthe delivery realised inurbaninfrastructure andservice therefore, physicalimprovements notsurprisingthatfew were address theemergingurbanchallenges(Mahiteme, 2007).It was, capacity and restricted political mandate could not effectively (Giorghis &Gérard, 2007) responsible fortheday-to-daymanagementofaffairscity lly toserveasabufferzoneavoid ²³ ²³ a became more of a civil administration In 1909,amodernurbanadministrationwasestablished, ²³ ¹ ²³ ¹ ¹ ¹ ²³ al structureofthecountry ²³ 6 . However, thecity’s limitedfinancial P Æ ²³ natural factors. In ²³ ²³ 5 ²³ . ²³ . 10 4 . THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 8 ▲ N ; Ahderom, ; Ahderom, 10 20 . While Abercombie’s plan While Abercombie’s . 9 . Many of the major roads that still criss- roads of the major . Many 7 cialist ideology, the . Proposed master plan by L. De Marien, 1965 (Mahiteme, 2007). Proposed 8 ementation of de Marien’s of de Marien’s ementation . The third master plan, prepared in 1965 by Luis de by in 1965 plan, prepared master . The third 11 The quest to modernize the City of Addis Ababa continued Addis the City of The quest to modernize Marien, a French consulting team, was based upon the visions of a French Marien, of these none 2007). However, (Mahiteme, its two predecessors andfinancial of lack due to the implemented were plans three Ababa until Addis The dilapidated condition of technical capacity. of lack of the combination of the result very is, therefore, recently plans and shortfalls spatial development in resources appropriate implementation. effective theirs plans’ for and personnel required system (Pasquiali, 2015) system (Pasquiali, in the post-Italian occupation era - the period of Imperial Rule. Rule. - the period of Imperial occupation era in the post-Italian proposed urban planners foreign 1956-1966, three During British the Ababa following Addis plans for master different by the prepared plan, master model. The first planning town proposed Abercrombie, Patrick planner Sir town famous British planned neighbourhood through city development decentralized periphery in the city’s satellite towns and six units, land zones 2013) Wubneh, 1986; (Ahderom, was based on a low estimation of population growth, the second of population growth, estimation was based on a low consultancy firm Bolton British the by master plan prepared a similar plan but based on a higher proposed & Partners Hennes (Yitbarek, 2008 projection population growth The Imperial Regime (1941-1974) Imperial The cross the city were built during the period of Italian occupation occupation the period of Italian built during were the city cross 2015) (Duroyaume, 1986) km from Addis Ababa). The objectives of of objectives The Ababa). Addis from km ewed by an Ethiopian team under the the under team Ethiopian an by ewed 8km in 1974 interrupted the impl in 1974 interrupted 4
0 Fig.7Addis Ababa's development as revised byLE. De. Marien, 1966-1974 planning Urban Ababa in Addis Low density density high field Sport airport Stream Road network Administrative zone Expansion area Green Zone zone Handcraft Industrial zone Railway
he first attempt to incorporate Ethiopia into Italy’s Italy’s Ethiopia into incorporate he first attempt to was aborted colonial territories in 1896 after overseas to Prior of Adwa. at the Battle defeated Italy Ethiopia 4
plan and eventually halted the growth of the city due to nationalization of extra housesplan and eventually halted the growth of the No. 47/1975 that prohibited private and urban land, as well as Proclamation activities. building in investment into power with a so of the Derg regime Following the coming plan for Addis Ababa was revi master C.K. Polonyi. In the revised consultancy of a Hungarian Professor urban planner, which shape linear a with development megalopolis a proposed Polonyi plan, master to Nazareth (100 extended south-eastwards to and products agricultural in self-sufficient city the make to were plan this Addis Ababa’s Master Plans during the Derg Period The change of political system redevelopment of Arada centre and Churchill Road without paying much attention to paying much Road without and Churchill redevelopment of Arada centre the rest of the city (Tesfaye 1987). Legend Fig. 7 Addis Ababa’s development as revised by LE. De. Marien, 1966-1974 1966-1974 Marien, De. by LE. as revised development Ababa’s Addis 7 Fig.
the outbreak of the Second World War, Italy occupied Ethiopia occupied Ethiopia Italy War, World of the Second the outbreak years (Pankhurst, it as a colony for five in 1935 and administered planning this shorturban western occupation, 1961). During a master attempts to prepare Two introduced. practices were Le architect made: by were Ababa Addis plan for the City of in 1938. Valle and Guidi architects Corbusier in 1936 and by rejected since was by Le Corbusier The 1936 master plan sketch could and consideration into topography city’s the take not did it 1938, the 2008). In practically (Tufa, not be applied therefore the by a master plan was inspired second attempt to prepare a plan; proposed Valle and Guidi of Le Corbusier. work previous of plan, based on the layout an orthogonalthat is, broadly street Legions. This second master camps of the Roman the overnight with residential housing development plan, in addition, proposed 2007), waste (Mahiteme, and Europeans of natives segregation constructionmanagement, road and a public transportation The Italian Occupation (1935-1941) Italian The
T 1.2 9 THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 (Yitbarek, 2008). (Yitbarek, housing toimprove thequality of lifeurbanresidents systems, drainageandroad networks, aswell ascondominium made toimprove watersupply, sanitation andwastecollection post-1991 government. Huge publicinvestments have been and provision becamethehallmark ofthe ofmodernservices of innercityareas ofcondominiumhousing andconstruction upgrading of mud (chika) houses was prohibited. Redevelopment (Mahiteme,in thecityoutskirts 2007).In the inner-cityareas, and road housing units networks, ofnew aswell asconstruction remedial measures, such as the upgrading of deteriorated housing were deplorable.In response, theEPRDF government undertook regime, thehousingandinfrastructure conditionsofthecity the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) By 1994,whenthe1986masterplanwasofficiallyapproved by plan contributed to uncontrolled sprawl of the city (Tufa, 2008). 1994, by whichtimeitwasout-dated(Mahiteme, 2007). Moreover,shortages. theplanwasnotofficiallyapproved until it failedtoaddress thecity’s housing,sanitationandinfrastructure (Wubneh, 2013).Theplan,however, hadonemajorshortcoming: decentralization and toprovide forthesurrounding areas services development ofurbancentres inthecity’s topromote periphery integration ofAddis Ababa withthesurrounding regions and original idea(Mahiteme, planfocusedon 2007).Thenew Italians, covering theperiod1986-2006, wasbasedonPolonyi’s beyond thefinancialmeansofgovernment. never putintopracticesinceitwasconsidered tooambitiousand master planunderprevious regimes, themegalopolisconceptwas to strengthen linkages(Ahderom, 1986). Likethe rural-urban integrating andlinkingAddis Ababa withthesurrounding towns place forpublicgatherings;and(2)megalopolisdevelopment by areas, theredevelopment particularly ofMeskel Square as a (1)development ofAddisinterventions: Ababa’s inner-city and Housing (Wubneh, 2013).Theplanproposed twomajor plan under the direction of Urban of the Ministry Development of Ethiopian plannersandarchitects in1978toprepare amaster and in1986.The Hungarian Planner C.K. Polonyi ledateam for Addis Ababa. Two different plans were proposed in1978 of landandhousingacross urbanareas 2008). (Yitbarek, income from sub-lettingofhousestoenforce afairer distribution issued in1975andoutlawed bothprivate ownership oflandand 47 “Government Ownership of Urban Landand Extra Houses” was land wasnationalized in1974.The ‘famous’ Proclamation No. Under andurban thepopularphrase‘landtotiller’allrural The Dergue Era (1974-1991) 2013) and socialdevelopment ofthenation(Wubneh, 2013;Ejigu, declared socialismasitsmajorideologytoguidetheeconomic The failure ofthe Dergue Regime totimelyimplementamaster The 1986 master plan, developed by a team of Ethiopians and The Dergue Regime alsoattempted todevelop amasterplan The Dergue Regime replaced Imperial Rule in 1974 and 12 andtransformedEthiopia’s landownership system.
1.3 H relevant facilities. Addis Ababa shares sheltersthatare oflessqualityandwithout rental prices today, ofthepeople in asignificantproportion persists (Palen, 1974). With increasing demandandhigher in recent years by theEPRDFgovernment thehousing problem severe housingcrisisinthe1970s.Despite commendable efforts develop acoherent landandhousingpolicy, thereby creating a
than owning theirdwelling. income populationshadthesoleoptionofrental housingrather on landownership. Thiscreated asituationunderwhichlow- was predominantly controlled by theeliteswhohadmonopoly Imperial Regime Land andhousingpolicyduringthe land (UN-Habitat, 2007) the 1974socialistrevolution thatabolishedprivate ownership of most ofthelandinAddis Ababa. This practicecontinued until individuals withstrong connectionstothemonarchy controlled (Giorghison theproperty &Gérard, 2007). Groups and showing thelandsize, boundaries andthenumberofbuildings Each landholderwasrequired tobeinpossessionofatitledeed government (Palen, 1974) from the withfinancialsupport constructed United States Project whichinvolvedof911low-income delivery houses housing provision mentioningistheKolfe thatisworth Housing areas of Ethiopia lived in substandard recently. housing until very surprising that an estimated 90% of the population in urban the economicelitewhocouldafford topay. It istherefore not negligible. Theyexclusively catered forhigh-incomegroups and alleviating the housing problem of low-income populations was supply during theImperial period, theircontribution towards Ababa consisted of rental units during theImperial era,some60%ofthehousingstockinAddis resources neededtoimprove andhousing.Thus, basicservices loss ofsignificant revenue deprived thecityauthorities very tributes were never registered inthemunicipality’s databank.The than tothemunicipalgovernment. Theselandtransactions and relationship asregular tributeswere paidtothelandlord rather acquired apieceoflandfrom themresembled tenant-landlord in 1975,therelationship between thelandlords andthosewho the soledistributorsofland.Until thenationalizationofland In Addis Ababa, theonlyproject focusedonlow-income Although private real estatedevelopers were involved inhousing Feudal lords engagedinrental housingdevelopment andwere of theFeudal regime allowed private landownership. related tolandholdingpolicy. Thelandtenure system duringtheImperialousing delivery Regime wasdirectly
in Addis Ababa Land andhousingpolicy 13 16 . 15 . The Imperial Regime hadfailedto
14 , suggesting that housing supply
THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 10 ▲ Kebele house today. © Geo Kalev © Geo house today. Kebele The Dergue Regime offered incentives to encourage develop- incentives Regime offered Dergue The of these state interventions, As a result a significant increase ment of housing cooperatives to expand the housing supply. the housing supply. to expand ment of housing cooperatives for the construction land was allocated without charge Firstly, for plot size units. The maximum dwelling of owner-occupied meters during the 1975-1986 housing was 500 square cooperative 292/1986, with the adoption of Proclamation period. However, meters. Secondly, to 250 square that ceiling has been reduced given were Cooperatives subsidized. building materials were retail priority access to construction government materials from was less than 65% of enterprises at a cost which, on the average, mortgage the Construction from loans Thirdly, value. the market with households made to cooperatives were Bank and Business market earning at least ETB 250 per month substantially below rates. interest 1986 to 2007). From (Tesfaye, in housing supply was recorded alone, nearly 60,000 households were Ababa 1992, in Addis between and homes own to build their in cooperatives organized 40,539 housing units (UN-Habitat, 1975 and 1992 produced significant unfulfilled these efforts,2011). Despite however, housing persists until today as demand demand for affordable outstrips the supply. . 17 . According . According 18 The Dergue Regime, in line with its socialist ideology, took Regime, in line with its socialist ideology, Dergue The The Dergue Regime introduced new delivery housing introduced Regime systems Dergue The the decision to distribute urban land and housing equitably to introduced it objective this achieve To inhabitants. city’s the Agency for was the associations. The first two types of housing for (AARH) responsible Houses of Rental the Administration housing with a rental the administration of government-owned ETB 100. The second housing delivery fee above monthly rental Kebele by administered Housing, Rental system was the Kebele association) and fetching a (urban dwellers Administration of less than ETB 100 (Yitbarek, 2008) monthly rent and abolished private sector rental or real estate development estate development or real sector rental and abolished private The nationalization of land and private the country. throughout in a significant loss of income to former property resulted never were house owners 2013). Moreover, (Ejigu, landlords compensated for their loss of land or housing. This situation wages and salaries in was further froze as the Dergue exacerbated of power result, the purchasing 1974 despite rising inflation. As a 1985) & Jacob, households steadily declined (Kebbede Land and housing policy during the Dergue the Dergue Land and housing policy during Period controlled 93.87% (142,095 units) (2007) the kebeles controlled Tesfaye to housing stock of 151,372 in owned of the total government Ababa. Addis 11 THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 1.4 Urban populationdemographics expected totripleby 2037(World Bank, 2015) population growth of4.89%. Ethiopia’s urbanpopulationis urban areas. This number is rising fast due to an annual urban
1889 (See Table 1). have provided estimatedpopulationnumbersforthecitysince data wasobtainedonlyin1961.However, several researchers Ababa’s populationtrends sinceitsestablishment.Thefirstcensus reach 4.7millioninhabitantsby 2030. experiencing anannualgrowth rateof3.8%andisestimatedto of Ethiopia’s totalurbanpopulation. Currently, Addis Ababa is hosts anestimated3.238millionpeople,whichisa17%share A Condominium housingconstructed inresponsetohousingdemand.© GeoKalev ▲ There isno reliable comprehensive statisticaldatatoshow Addis total population19.5%(17.5millionpeople)live in total populationisabout90millionpeople.Of the ccording totheCSAJuly 2015estimate,Ethiopia’s
charact Population anddemogr Addis Ababatoday: eristics 19 . Addis Ababa aphic (Source: AddisAbabaCityGovernment(2002),CSA(2012),Mahiteme(2007),Palen (1974)) (IN THOUSANDS, 1889-2016) TABLE 1: Year 2010 2007 1994 1984 1979 1967 1961 1960s 1935 1930s 1910 1889 ADDIS ABABAESTIMATED POPULATION (Estimated) population 3.3 million 2.7 million 2.11 million 1.42 million 1.27 million 683,530 455,490 300,000 –400,000 140,000 80,000 65,000 15,000 THE STATE OF ADDIS ABABA 2017 12 ▲ Public sanitation facility. © Geo Kalev sanitation facility. Public . 22 This population growth will put further and continued This population growth on its way to building the is well Ethiopia Fortunately, economic growth, the urban poverty incidence is on the rise the urban poverty economic growth, 2014) (UNEP, challenges and pressure on the city administration to provide provide to administration city the on pressure and challenges basic efficient and affordable services and housing in sufficient a doubling of the city capacity do so would require To quantities. implementation, in urban planning, management and effective would It the top. leadership from political supported strong by decisions to enhance prioritization of key investment also require that of the city and attract investment the competitiveness population. job opportunities for its growing generates more impacts; both on the catastrophic to plan ahead may have Failure of its citizens. economy and on the welfare for kick-startingfoundations basic policy and institutional an industrialization path that could lead to structural transformation The development. inclusive more of its economy and towards be would Ababa Addis administration of the city for priority heavily in infrastructure investing gains by to build on recent the and to continue strengthening drivers and other key growth of key municipal institutions responsiveness and effectiveness essential servicesthat deliver to the population and the (potential) business community.