DOCSLIB.ORG

Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide United States Department of Agriculture Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Economic Research Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Service Industries Worldwide Economic Keith O. Fuglie Kelly Day-Rubenstein Research Report Paul W. Heisey David Schimmelpfennig Number 130 John L. King Sun Ling Wang December 2011 Carl E. Pray Rupa Karmarkar-Deshmukh da.gov .us rs .e w Visit Our Website To Learn More! w w www.ers.usda.gov Recommended citation format for this publication: Fuglie, Keith O., Paul W. Heisey, John L. King, Carl E. Pray, Kelly Day-Rubenstein, David Schimmelpfennig, Sun Ling Wang, and Rupa Karmarkar-Deshmukh. Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide. ERR-130. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Econ. Res. Serv. December 2011. Use of commercial and trade names does not imply approval or constitute endorsement by USDA. Photos: Thinkstock. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. A Report from the Economic Research Service United States Department www.ers.usda.gov of Agriculture Research Investments and Economic Research Report Market Structure in the Food Number 130 Processing, Agricultural Input, December 2011 and Biofuel Industries Worldwide Keith O. Fuglie, [email protected], Paul W. Heisey, John L. King, Carl E. Pray, Kelly Day-Rubenstein, David Schimmelpfennig, Sun Ling Wang, and Rupa Karmarkar-Deshmukh Abstract Meeting growing global demand for food, fi ber, and biofuel requires robust investment in agricultural research and development (R&D) from both public and private sectors. This study examines global R&D spending by private industry in seven agricultural input sectors, food manufacturing, and biofuel and describes the changing structure of these industries. In 2007 (the latest year for which comprehensive estimates are available), the private sector spent $19.7 billion on food and agricultural research (56 percent in food manufacturing and 44 percent in agricultural input sectors) and accounted for about half of total public and private spending on food and agricultural R&D in high-income coun- tries. In R&D related to biofuel, annual private-sector investments are estimated to have reached $1.47 billion worldwide by 2009. Incentives to invest in R&D are infl uenced by market structure and other factors. Agricultural input industries have undergone signifi cant structural change over the past two decades, with industry concentration on the rise. A rela- tively small number of large, multinational fi rms with global R&D and marketing networks account for most R&D in each input industry. Rising market concentration has not generally been associated with increased R&D investment as a percentage of industry sales. Keywords: agricultural biotechnology, agricultural chemicals, agricultural inputs, animal breeding, animal health, animal nutrition, aquaculture, biofuel, concentration ratio, crop breeding, crop protection, farm machinery, fertilizers, Herfi ndahl index, globalization, market share, market structure, research intensity, seed improvement. Acknowledgments The authors would like to sincerely thank Patrick Sullivan (USDA, Economic Research Service) for coordinating the peer review of this study and the following individuals for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of the report: Vivienne Anthony and Marco Ferroni (Syngenta Foundation); Allen Baker, Jorge Fernandez- Cornejo, and Sarahelen Thompson (USDA, Economic Research Service); Mark Boggess, Cyril Gay, and Jeff Silverstein (USDA, Agricultural Research Service); Derek Byerlee (CGIAR); Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes (University of Missouri-Columbia); William Muir (Purdue University); Charlie O’Brien (Association of Equipment Manufacturers); Robin Readnour (Elanco Animal Health); Amit Roy (International Fertilizer Development Center); Greg Traxler (Gates Foundation), Harry Vroomen (The Fertilizer Institute), and fi ve anonymous reviewers. We would also like to thank representatives of agricultural input companies for providing R&D and other information on their fi rms and industries. Jennifer Cairns and Jessica Gottlieb provided helpful research assistance and John Weber and Wynnice Pointer-Napper provided excellent editorial and design services. ii Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide / ERR-130 Economic Research Service/USDA Contents Summary. iv Chapter 1 Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide: Synthesis of Results . .1 Objectives and Methods of Study . .1 Private-Sector R&D Investment in Agriculture, Food, and Biofuel . 4 Market Size and Private Food and Agricultural R&D . .10 Market Structure and R&D in AgriculturalInput Industries. 14 Globalization of Private Agricultural R&D . 17 References . 20 Chapter 2 Private Research and Development for Crop Genetic Improvement . 25 Global Market for Crop Seed . 25 Structure of the Global Seed Industry. 29 Agricultural Biotechnology and the Seed Industry. 36 Trends in Private R&D Investment and Innovation in Crop Genetic Improvement . 38 Factors Infl uencing Future Trends in Private-Sector Seed-Biotechnology R&D . 44 References . 45 Chapter 3 Private Research and Development for Crop Protection Chemicals. 49 Market Size and R&D Spending in the Global Pesticide Industry . 49 Structure of R&D in the Global Crop Protection Industry . 50 Innovation Trends in Crop Protection . 57 Conclusions . 61 References . 62 Chapter 4 Private Research and Development for Synthetic Fertilizers. 66 The Global Agricultural Fertilizer Market and Industry Structure . 66 R&D and Technical Change in the Fertilizer Industry. 68 References . 71 Chapter 5 Farm Machinery Research and Development by Private Industry. 74 Global Farm Machinery Markets and Factors Affecting Farm Mechanization . .74 Farm Machinery Market Structure, Innovation, and R&D Spending. 75 Farm Machinery R&D in the United States . 77 References . 78 iii Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide / ERR-130 Economic Research Service/USDA Contents—continued Chapter 6 Private Research and Development for Animal Health . .80 Global Market for Animal Health Products . 81 Animal Health Industry Structure . 82 Industry Investment in Animal Health R&D . .86 References . 88 Chapter 7 Animal Genetic Improvement by the Private Sector . .90 Structure of the Animal Genetics Industry. 91 The Market for Animal Genetics . 98 Research Spending in the Animal Genetics Industry . 101 Implications of Market Structure on Animal Breeding Research. 103 References . 104 Chapter 8 Private Research and Development for Animal Nutrition . 107 Types of Manufactured Animal Feed . 107 Global Market for Manufactured Feed . 107 R&D Spending by Animal Feed Companies . 109 References . 111 Chapter 9 Research and Development in the Food Manufacturing Industry . 113 R&D Spending by the Food Manufacturing Industry. 113 Factors Affecting R&D Investment by Food Manufacturing Firms . 116 Innovation and Productivity in Food Manufacturing . 119 Conclusions . 120 References . 120 Chapter 10 Private Research and Development for Biofuel. 123 Global Production of Biofuels. 123 Biofuel R&D Conducted by Industry . 126 Public Funding for Bioenergy R&D . 132 The Future of Biofuel Research and Biofuels Technology . .134 References . 135 iv Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide / ERR-130 Economic Research Service/USDA Summary What Is the Issue? Growth in the productivity of the global food and agricultural system will be largely determined by today’s investments in research and development (R&D). In recent decades, the private sector has become a major player in developing innovations for food and agriculture. Factors spurring private companies to invest in food and agricultural research include the emergence of biotechnology and other new scientifi c developments, the strengthening of intellectual property rights (IPR) over agricultural innovations, new regula- tory requirements, the expansion of markets for improved agricultural inputs and food products, and rising consumer demand for more diverse foods. More recently, rapid growth in the market for biofuel has pushed companies to expand their R&D investments in this area as well. This report quantifi es investment trends by for-profi t companies in food manufacturing, biofuel, and agricultural input R&D and explores how these trends are affected by changes in market demand and industry structure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Butvar Properties and Uses
    Pub. No. 2008084E (Supersedes 2008084D) Butvar ® POLYVINYL BUTYRAL RESIN PROPERTIES & USES Coatings Performance Materials by CONTENTS Introduction 1 Properties 2 Chemistry 2 Properties Tables 3 Product Types 6 Butvar:The Right Resin Solutions 6 Compatibility 13 Insolubizing Reactions 15 Reaction With Phenolics 15 Reaction With Epoxies 15 Reaction With Dialdhehydes 16 Reaction With Isocyanates 16 Reaction With Melamines 16 Applications 17 Wire Enamels 17 Surface Coatings 17 Wash Primers 17 Military Specification Wash Primers 17 Non-specification Wash Primers: B-1030 With Butvar 18 Single Package Wash Primer: B-1011 With Butvar 18 Chromate-free Wash Primers With Butvar 19 Metal Coatings 20 Wood Finishes 21 Protective Wash Coats and Sealers 21 Knot Sealers 21 Adhesives 22 Structural Adhesives 22 Phenolic Resins 22 Epoxies and Other Thermosetting Resins 22 High-strength Bonding Procedure 23 Performance Characteristics 23 Adhesive Strengths 23 Hot Melt Adhesives 24 Textile Coatings 24 Advantages as Textile Coating 24 Ceramic Binder Applications 25 Tape Casting 26 Thick Films 26 Toners and Printing Inks 27 Storage and Handling 28 Storage 28 Toxicity and FDA Status 28 Quality Control 28 Material Sources Inside Back Cover Worldwide Sales Offices Back Cover Enfocus Software - Customer Support INTRODUCTION olyvinyl butyral resins are employed in a wide USES array of industrial and commercial applications. Some of the applications in which Butvar is a vital PThese unique resins offer impressive performance, ingredient include: as well as outstanding versatility. Ceramic binders Butvar® polyvinyl butyral resins have a combination of Inks/dry toners properties that make them a key ingredient in a variety Wood coatings of successful formulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Monsanto Company in Microsoft Word Format Together with a Copy of the Transmittal Letter That Accompanies the Filing of Two Paper Copies of the Submission
    From: Letzler, Kenneth [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 1:03 PM To: ATR-Agricultural Workshops Subject: Comment Attached please find a comment submitted on behalf of Monsanto Company in Microsoft Word format together with a copy of the transmittal letter that accompanies the filing of two paper copies of the submission. _____________________________ U.S. Treasury Circular 230 Notice Any U.S. federal tax advice included in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding U.S. federal tax-related penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein. _____________________________ This communication may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information about Arnold & Porter LLP, click here: http://www.arnoldporter.com Competition and Innovation in American Agriculture A Response to the American Antitrust Institute’s “Transgenic Seed Platforms: Competition Between a Rock and a Hard Place?” Submitted on Behalf of Monsanto Company In Response to the Request for Comments by the United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, in Connection with Their Hearings on “Agriculture and Antitrust Enforcement Issues in Our 21st Century Economy” Vandy Howell, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Tide Monsanto
    Green Tide http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/mar99tokar.htm Monsanto: A Checkered History Who should choose our technologies? By Brian Tokar Headquartered just outside St. Louis, Missouri, the Monsanto Chemical Company was founded in 1901 by John Francis Queeny. Queeny, a self- educated chemist, brought the technology to manufacture saccharin, the first artificial sweetener, from Germany to the United States. In the 1920s, Monsanto became a leading manufacturer of sulfuric acid and other basic industrial chemicals, and is one of only four companies to be listed among the top ten U.S. chemical companies in every decade since the 1940s. By the 1940s, plastics and synthetic fabrics had become a centerpiece of Monsanto’s business. In 1947, a French freighter carrying ammonium nitrate fertilizer blew up at a dock 270 feet from Monsanto’s plastics plant outside Galveston, Texas. More than 500 people died in what came to be seen as one of the chemical industry’s first major disasters. The plant was manufacturing styrene and polystyrene plastics, which are still important constituents of food packaging and various consumer products. In the 1980s the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) listed polystyrene as fifth in its ranking of the chemicals whose production generates the most total hazardous waste. In 1929, the Swann Chemical Company, soon to be purchased by Monsanto, developed polychlori- nated biphenyls (PCBs), which were widely praised for their nonflammability and extreme chemical stability. The most widespread uses were in the electrical equipment industry, which adopted PCBs as a nonflammable coolant for a new generation of transformers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Citizens Report on the State of Gmos Synthesis Report !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+
    !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+ Published by A Global Citizens Report on the State of GMOs Synthesis Report !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+ !"#$%&'$"()*)+,-."/,0%1*" %-"*2,"3*'*,"%4"#56."7 8'$.,"91%:).,.;"8')$,<"=,>2-%$%?),. 3@-*2,.)."/,0%1* Coordinated by Vandana Shiva, Navdanya Debbie Barker, Centre for Food Safety Caroline Lockhart, Navdanya International Front page cartoon: Sergio Staino Layout, production and printing: SICREA srl, Florence Contact: [email protected] Available for download at www.navdanyainternational.it www.navdanya.org Thanks go to all those who readily contributed in the realization of this report, particularly Sergio Staino, creator of the cover cartoon, Maurizio Izzo of Sicrea for production and Massimo Orlandi for press and communications. Thanks also go to Christina Stafford and interns Tara McNerney and Tanvi Gadhia of Center for Food Safety (CFS) and Sulakshana Fontana, Elena Bellini and Filippo Cimo of Navdanya International for their diligent coordination, editing and translation efforts. Final thanks also go to Giannozzo Pucci, Maria Grazia Mammuccini and Natale Bazzanti for their cooperation and assistance in realizing this report. This publication is printed on ecological paper SYMBOL FREELIFE SATIN ECF *$%/012/$-3435678$)690:4$ 07$4;6$+4246$0<$%&'8$=$ >2/86$(:0?3868@$>23/6A$!6B;70/0C368 Coordinated by Navdanya and Navdanya International, the International Commission on the Future of Food and Agriculture, with the participation of The Center for Food Safety (CFS) Contributing organizations:
    [Show full text]
  • Who Will Control the Green Economy? ETC Group, 2011
    !"#$%&''$(#)*+#'$*",$ -+,,)$.(#)#/01 23$4#5,+)/,)*3$6+,67+,$*#$37)(*&#)$7$-+,,) .(#)#/0 7*$8&#9:;<$.=>$-+#?6$6+#5&@,3$ 7)$?6@7*,$#)$(#+6#+7*,$6#%,+$7)@$ %7+)3$*"7*$*",$A?,3*$*#$(#)*+#'$B&#/733$ %&''$6,+6,*?7*,$*",$-+,,@ .(#)#/0C %%%C,*(4+#?6C#+4 “We are told by men of science that all the venture of mariners on the sea, all that counter-marching tribes and races that confounds old history with its dust and rumour, sprang from nothing more abstruse than the laws of supply and demand, and a certain natural instinct for cheap rations. To any one thinking deeply, this will seem a dull and pitiful explanation.” —Robert Louis Stevenson, Will o’ the Mill, 1901 “As long as the maximization of profit remains the cornerstone of acquisitive society and capitalist economy, corporations will retain their interest in scarcity as a creator of economic value.” —German-born economist, Erich W. Zimmermann, in World resources and industries: a functional appraisal of the availability of agricultural and industrial materials, 1933 2(D)#%',@4,/,)*3 All original artwork, including the cover illustration, “BioMassters: The Board Game,” and report design by Shtig. ETC Group gratefully acknowledges the financial support of SwedBio (Sweden), HKH Foundation (USA), CS Fund “Trickle Down” by Adam Zyglis used with permission. (USA), Christensen Fund (USA), Heinrich Böll Who Will Control the Green Economy? is ETC Group Foundation (Germany), the Lillian Goldman Charitable Communiqué no. 107. Trust (USA), Oxfam Novib (Netherlands) and the Norwegian Forum for Environment and Development. November 2011 ETC Group is solely responsible for the views expressed in All ETC Group publications are available free of charge this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle V. Monsanto Complaint
    Case 2:16-cv-00107-RSL Document 31 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 27 1 THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation ) CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00107-RSL located in the County of King, State of ) 10 Washington, ) PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED ) COMPLAINT 11 Plaintiffs, ) ) 12 v. ) ) 13 MONSANTO COMPANY, ) SOLUTIA INC., and ) 14 PHARMACIA CORPORATION, and DOES 1 ) through 100, ) 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ________________________________________ I. INTRODUCTION 17 1. Polychlorinated biphenyls (or “PCBs”) are man-made chemical compounds that 18 have become notorious as global environmental contaminants — found in bays, oceans, rivers, 19 streams, soil, and air. As a result, PCBs have been detected in the tissues of all living beings on 20 earth including all forms of marine life, various animals and birds, plants and trees, and humans. 21 2. The extent of environmental PCB contamination is troubling because PCBs cause 22 a variety of adverse health effects. In humans, PCB exposure is associated with cancer as well as 23 serious non-cancer health effects, including effects on the immune system, reproductive system, PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT - 1 Peter S. Holmes Seattle City Attorney 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2050 Seattle, WA 98104-7097 (206) 684-8200 Case 2:16-cv-00107-RSL Document 31 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 27 1 nervous system, endocrine system and other health effects. In addition, PCBs destroy 2 populations of fish, birds, and other animal life. 3 3.
    [Show full text]
  • World Resources Institute the Monsanto Company
    World Resources Institute Sustainable Enterprise Program A program of the World Resources Institute The Monsanto Company: Quest for Sustainability (A) “Biotechnology represents a potentially sustainable For more than a decade, WRI's solution to the issue, not only of feeding people, but of providing Sustainable Enterprise Program (SEP) the economic growth that people are going to need to escape has harnessed the power of business to poverty…… [Biotechnology] poses the possibility of create profitable solutions to leapfrogging the industrial revolution and moving to a post- environment and development industrial society that is not only economically attractive, but challenges. BELL, a project of SEP, is also environmentally sustainable.i ” focused on working with managers and academics to make companies --Robert Shapiro, CEO, Monsanto Company more competitive by approaching social and environmental challenges as unmet market needs that provide Upon his promotion to CEO of chemical giant The business growth opportunities through Monsanto Company in 1995, Robert Shapiro became a vocal entrepreneurship, innovation, and champion of sustainable development and sought to redefine the organizational change. firm’s business strategy along principles of sustainability. Shapiro’s rhetoric was compelling. He captured analysts’ Permission to reprint this case is attention with the specter of mass hunger and environmental available at the BELL case store. degradation precipitated by rapid population growth and the Additional information on the Case
    [Show full text]
  • 171101 Final PRODOC Autom
    UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Project of the Republic of Belarus Project number: ID 170165 Project title: Institutional strengthening and policy support to upgrade the component manufacturers in the automotive sector in the Republic of Belarus Project phase Phase II Thematic area code GC2 Advancing Economic Competitiveness Starting date: Phase I: 2014–2017 Phase II: 2017–2019 Duration: Phase I: 30 months Phase II: 15 months Project site: Republic of Belarus Government Coordinating agency: National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Main counterpart: Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Belarus Executing agency: UNIDO Donor: Russian Federation Project Inputs Phase I: - Project costs: USD 880,530 - Support costs 13%: USD 114,470 - Total project costs: USD 995,000 Project Inputs Phase II: - Project costs: USD 398,230 - Support costs 13%: USD 51,770 - Total project costs: USD 450,000 (the Russian voluntary contribution to UNIDO IDF) Brief description: The overall objective of the project is to assist the automotive component suppliers in the Republic of Belarus to meet the requirements of Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and the first-tier automotive component manufacturers. More specifically, the project foresees: Enhancing the performance of participating suppliers in the automotive component industry in the Republic of Belarus to ensure their international competitiveness through enterprises oriented direct shop floor interventions, at a first step on a pilot-bases, and finally through selected business support and advisory institutions. Upgrading the relevant support institutions through strengthening institutional set-up, optimization of the service portfolio and development of a base of well-trained national engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimensions
    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development PROTECTING AND PROMOTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE: SYSTEMS, NATIONAL EXPERIENCES AND INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS Sophia Twarog and Promila Kapoor, Editors UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2004 i Note Symbols of the United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNCTAD secretariat. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is re- quested, together with a reference to the document number. A copy of the publication contain- ing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat (c/o Administrative Secretary, Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland). Cover photo by Jean Philippe Soule courtesy of www.nativeplanet.org UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Symbol No. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/10 ISSN: 1812-7061 Copyright © United Nations, 2004 All rights reserved ii Foreword The preservation, protection and promotion of the traditional knowledge, innovations and prac- tices of local and indigenous communities (TK) is of key importance for developing countries. Their rich endowment of TK and biodiversity plays a critical role in their health care, food security, culture, religion, identity, environment, sustainable development and trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Tractor Brochure (Pdf)
    CONTENTS CONTENTS Power tillers and compact tractors 1000-series Power tillers 1021 28 09N 4 1021.3/1021.4 28 100-series 1021.5 29 132N 5 1025.2 30 112N-01 6 1025.3/1025.4 30 152 7 1025.5 30 300-series 1025.6 31 311/311М 8 1200-series 321/321М 8 1220.3/1220.4 32 310.4/310.4М 8 1220.5 32 320.4/320.4М 9 1220.6 33 400/600-series 1300-series 422.4/622 10 1221.2/1221Т.2 34 451/651 11 1221.2/1221V.2 34 Versatile row-crop tractors 1221.3 34 Versatile500-series row-crop tractors 1221.4 34 510/512 14 1221.5 34 511/511.1 14 1221.6 34 512.1/512.2 14 1222.3 34 611/612 15 General-purpose tractors 570/572 16 1500-series 800-series 1523/1523V 36 811/812 16 1523.3 36 911/912 16 1523Т1 36 90/92 17 1523Т1.3 36 80.1/82.1 18 1523.4 36 820 18 1523.5 36 892/892.2 19 1523.6 36 900-series 1800-series 900.3/900.4 20 1822.3 40 920/920.2 20 2000-series 920.3/920.4 20 2022.3/2022V.3 42 920.6 21 2022V.3-17/32 42 922.3/922.4 22 2022.4 42 922.5 23 2022.5 42 923.3 24 2022.6 43 923.4 24 2122.3 44 923.5 25 2122.4/2122.6 45 952/952.2 26 3000-series 952.3 26 3022DZ.1/3022.V 46 952.4 26 3500-series 952.5 26 3522 48 952.6 27 3525 49 Contact phone numbers: +375 (17) 246-60-09 (help desk, working hours from 7.00 am to 3.20 pm – UTC +3, Minsk) +375 (17) 398-89-50 (fax) E-mail: [email protected] WWW.BELARUS-TRACTOR.COM SMALL AND COMPACT TRACTORS Power tiller 100 series 300 series 400 series 600 series 3 SMALL AND COMPACT TRACTORS Small tractors BELARUS 09H POWER TILLER This power tiller is intended for agricultural operations on small land plots, small private farms, for cargo hauling, for stationary operations providing drive from power takeoff shaft, and for municipal works.
    [Show full text]
  • GAZ Group Annual Report 2008
    Annual Report 2008 GAZ Group 1 Contents Statement of the Chairman of the Management Board ........................................................................ 3 GAZ Group general information .......................................................................................................... 5 GAZ Group profile ........................................................................................................................... 5 GAZ Group mission and strategy..................................................................................................... 7 Organizational structure ................................................................................................................... 9 Key events of 2008......................................................................................................................... 10 Key events of the beginning of 2009.............................................................................................. 17 Main lines of business ........................................................................................................................ 19 Light commercial vehicles (LCV) and medium commercial vehicles (MCV) .............................. 19 Buses............................................................................................................................................... 25 Trucks ............................................................................................................................................. 30 Construction
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Crop Technology Jerry M
    Weed Science 2009 57:108–117 Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Crop Technology Jerry M. Green* New and improved glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops continue to be rapidly developed. These crops confer greater crop safety to multiple glyphosate applications, higher rates, and wider application timings. Many of these crops will also have glyphosate resistance stacked with traits that confer resistance to herbicides with other modes of actions to expand the utility of existing herbicides and to increase the number of mixture options that can delay the evolution of GR weeds. Some breeding stacks of herbicide resistance traits are currently available, but the trend in the future will be to combine resistance genes in molecular stacks. The first example of such a molecular stack has a new metabolically based mechanism to inactivate glyphosate combined with an active site-based resistance for herbicides that inhibit acetolactate synthase (ALS). This stack confers resistance to glyphosate and all five classes of ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Other molecular stacks will include glyphosate resistance with resistance to auxin herbicides and herbicides that inhibit acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) and 4-hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD). Scientists are also studying a number of other herbicide resistance transgenes. Some of these new transgenes will be used to make new multiple herbicide-resistant crops that offer growers more herbicide options to meet their changing weed management needs and to help sustain the efficacy of glyphosate. Nomenclature: Glyphosate. Key words: Genetically modified crops, GMO, herbicide resistant crops, glyphosate, ALS, dicamba, imidazolinone, glufosinate, sulfonylurea. In 1970, glyphosate, a broad-spectrum and highly adopted technology in the history of agriculture (James translocated foliar herbicide, was discovered (Franz et al.
    [Show full text]