DOCSLIB.ORG

(R) Counties Won 86 Fitzgerald (D) 1,009,359 33.03 % (D) Counties Won 2 Other 101,706 3.33% Variance (R) 935,489 30.61% Variance (R) 84

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(R) Counties Won 86 Fitzgerald (D) 1,009,359 33.03 % (D) Counties Won 2 Other 101,706 3.33% Variance (R) 935,489 30.61% Variance (R) 84 Ohio Governor 2014 - *John Kasich (R) - Edward Fitzgerald (D) * Kasich (R) 1,944,848 63.64 % (R) Counties Won 86 Fitzgerald (D) 1,009,359 33.03 % (D) Counties Won 2 Other 101,706 3.33% Variance (R) 935,489 30.61% Variance (R) 84 Ohio Governor 2010 * John Kasich (R) - Ted Strickland (D) * Kasich (R) 1,889,186 49.04 % (R) Counties Won 61 Strickland (D) 1,812,059 47.04 % (D) Counties Won 27 Other 151,228 3.93% Variance (R) 77,127 2.00 % Variance (R) 34 Ohio Governor 2006 J. Kenneth Blackwell (R) - * Ted Strickland (D) Blackwell (R) 1,474,285 36.65 % (R) Counties Won 16 * Strickland (D) 2,435,384 60.54 % (D) Counties Won 72 Other 113,085 2.81% Variance (D) 961,099 23.89 % Variance (D) 56 Ohio Governor 2002 • Bob Taft (R) - Tim Hagan (D) • Taft (R) 1,865,007 57.76 % (R) Counties Won 82 Hagan (D) 1,236,924 38.31 % (D) Counties Won 6 Other 127,061 3.94 % Variance (R) 628,083 19.45 % Variance (R) 76 Ohio Governor 1998 • Bob Taft (R) - Lee Fisher (D) • Taft (R) 1,678,721 50.05 % (R) Counties Won 68 Fisher (D) 1,498,956 44.69 % (D) Counties Won 20 Other 176,536 5.26 % Variance (R) 179,765 5.36 % Variance (R) 48 Ohio Governor 1994 • George V. Voinovich (R) - Robert L. Burch (D) • Voinovich (R) 2,401,572 71.77 % (R) Counties Won 86 Burch (D) 835,849 24.98 % (D) Counties Won 2 Other 108,817 3.25 % Variance (R) 1,565,723 46.79 % Variance (R) 84 Ohio Governor 1990 • George V. Voinovich (R) - Anthony J. Celebreeze Jr. (D) • Voinovich (R) 1,938,103 55.73 % (R) Counties Won 75 Celebreeze (D) 1,539,416 44.27 % (D) Counties Won 13 Other 130 0.00 % Variance (R) 398,687 11.46 % Variance (R) 62 Ohio Governor 1986 James A. Rhodes (R) - • Richard F. Celeste (D) Rhodes (R) 1,207,264 39.37 % (R) Counties Won 33 • Celeste (D) 1,858,372 60.60 % (D) Counties Won 55 Other 975 0.03 % Variance (D) 651,108 21.23 % Variance (D) 22 Ohio Governor 1982 Clarence J. Brown (R) - • Richard F. Celeste (D) Brown (R) 1,303,962 38.85 % (R) Counties Won 28 • Celeste (D) 1,981,882 59.04 % (D) Counties Won 60 Other 70,843 2.11 % Variance (D) 677,920 20.20 % Variance (D) 32 Ohio Governor 1978 • James A. Rhodes (R) - Richard F. Celeste (D) • Rhodes (R) 1,402,167 49.31 % (R) Counties Won 69 Celeste (D) 1,354,631 47.64 % (D) Counties Won 19 Other 86,553 3.04 % Variance (R) 47,536 1.67 % Variance (R) 50 Ohio Governor 1974 • James A. Rhodes (R) - John J. Gilligan (D) • Rhodes (R) 1,493,679 48.62 % (R) Counties Won 69 Gilligan (D) 1,482,191 48.25 % (D) Counties Won 19 Other 96,140 3.13 % Variance (R) 11,488 0.37 % Variance (R) 50 Ohio Governor 1970 Roger Cloud (R) - *John J. Gilligan (D) Cloud (R) 1,382,659 43.42 % (R) Counties Won 54 • Gilligan (D) 1,725,560 54.19 % (D) Counties Won 34 Other 75,914 2.38 % Variance (D) 342,901 10.77 % Variance (R) 20 Ohio Governor 1966 • James A. Rhodes (R) - Frazier Reams Jr. (D) • Rhodes (R) 1,795,277 62.18 % (R) Counties Won 87 Reams (D) 1,092,054 37.82 % (D) Counties Won 1 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (R) 703,223 24.36 % Variance (R) 86 Ohio Governor 1962 • James A. Rhodes (R) - Michael V. DiSalle • Rhodes (R) 1,836,432 58.92 % (R) Counties Won 85 DiSalle (D) 1,280,521 41.08 % (D) Counties Won 3 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (R) 555,911 17.84 % Variance (R) 82 Ohio Governor 1958 William C. O'Neill (R) - • Michael V. DiSalle (D) O'Neill (R) 1,414,874 43.08 % (R) Counties Won 42 • DiSalle(D) 1,869,260 56.92 % (D) Counties Won 46 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (D) 454,386 13.84 % Variance (D) 4 Ohio Governor 1956 • William C. O'Neill (R) - Michael V. DiSalle (D) • O'Neill (R) 1,984,988 56.04 % (R) Counties Won 83 DiSalle (D) 1,557,103 43.96 % (D) Counties Won 5 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (R) 427,885 12.08 % Variance (R) 78 Ohio Governor 1954 James A. Rhodes (R) - • Frank J. Lausche (D) Rhodes (R) 1,192,528 45.91 % (R) Counties Won 62 • Lausche (D) 1,405,262 54.09 % (D) Counties Won 26 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (D) 212,734 8.19 % Variance (R) 36 Ohio Governor 1952 Charles P. Taft (R) - • Frank J. Lausche (D) Taft (R) 1,590,058 44.10 % (R) Counties Won 35 • Lausche (D) 2,015,111 55.90 % (D) Counties Won 53 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (D) 425,053 11.79 % Variance (D) 18 Ohio Governor 1950 Don H. Ebright (R) - • Frank J. Lausche (D) Ebright (R) 1,370,570 47.38 % (R) Counties Won 67 • Lausche (D) 1,522,249 52.62 % (D) Counties Won 21 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (D) 151,679 5.24 % Variance (R) 46 Ohio Governor 1948 Thomas J. Herbert (R) - • Frank J. Lausche (D) Herbert (R) 1,398,514 46.33 % (R) Counties Won 53 • Lausche (D) 1,619,775 53.67 % (D) Counties Won 35 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (D) 221,261 7.33 % Variance (R) 18 Ohio Governor 1946 • Thomas J. Herbert (R) - Frank J. Lausche (D) • Herbert (R) 1,166,550 50.64 % (R) Counties Won 70 Lausche (D) 1,125,997 48.88 % (D) Counties Won 18 Other 11,203 0.49 % Variance (R) 40,553 1.76 % Variance (R) 52 Ohio Governor 1944 James G. Stewart (R) - • Frank J. Lausche (D) Stewart (R) 1,491,450 48.18 % (R) Counties Won 70 • Lausche (D) 1,603,809 51.82 % (D) Counties Won 18 Other 16 0.00 % Variance (D) 112,359 3.63 % Variance (R) 52 Ohio Governor 1942 • John W. Bricker (R) - John McSweeney (D) • Bricker (R) 1,086,937 60.50 % (R) Counties Won 86 McSweeney (D) 709,599 39.50 % (D) Counties Won 2 Other 34 0.00 % Variance (R) 377,338 21.00 % Variance (R) 84 Ohio Governor 1940 • John W. Bricker (R) - Martin L Davey (D) • Bricker (R) 1,824,863 55.55 % (R) Counties Won 77 Davey (D) 1,460,396 44.45 % (D) Counties Won 11 Other 428 0.01 % Variance (R) 364,467 11.09 % Variance (R) 66 Ohio Governor 1938 • John W. Bricker (R) - Charles Sawyer (D) • Bricker (R) 1,265,548 52.45 % (R) Counties Won 77 Sawyer (D) 1,147,323 47.55 % (D) Counties Won 11 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (R) 118,225 4.90 % Variance (R) 66 Ohio Governor 1936 John W. Bricker (R) - • Martin L. Davey (D) Bricker (R) 1,412,773 47.74 % (R) Counties Won 39 • Davey (D) 1,539,461 52.02 % (D) Counties Won 49 Other 7,372 0.25 % Variance (D) 126,688 4.28 % Variance (D) 10 Ohio Governor 1934 Clarence J. Brown (R) - • Martin L. Davey (D) Brown (R) 1,052,851 48.14 % (R) Counties Won 49 • Davey (D) 1,118,257 51.13 % (D) Counties Won 39 Other 15,918 0.73 % Variance (D) 65,406 2.99 % Variance (R) 10 Ohio Governor 1932 David S. Ingalls (R) - • George White (D) Ingalls (R) 1,151,933 44.85 % (R) Counties Won 19 • White (D) 1,356,518 52.81 % (D) Counties Won 69 Other 59,996 2.34 % Variance (D) 204,585 7.97 % Variance (D) 50 Ohio Governor 1930 Myers Y. Cooper (R) - • George White (D) Cooper (R) 923,538 47.20 % (R) Counties Won 30 • White (D) 1,033,168 52.80 % (D) Counties Won 58 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (D) 109,630 5.60 % Variance (D) 28 Ohio Governor 1928 • Myers Y. Cooper (R) - Martin L. Davey (D) • Cooper (R) 1,355,517 54.79 % (R) Counties Won 71 Davey (D) 1,106,739 44.74 % (D) Counties Won 17 Other 11,690 0.47 % Variance (R) 248,778 10.06 % Variance (R) 54 Ohio Governor 1926 Myers Y. Cooper (R) - • Vic Donahey (D) Cooper (R) 685,957 49.13 % (R) Counties Won 44 • Donahey (D) 702,733 50.33 % (D) Counties Won 44 Other 7,582 0.54 % Variance (D) 16,776 1.20 % Variance (R) 0 Ohio Governor 1924 Harry L. Davis (R) - • Vic Donahey (D) Davis (R) 888,145 45.01 % (R) Counties Won 19 • Donahey (D) 1,064,981 53.97 % (D) Counties Won 69 Other 20,244 1.03 % Variance (D) 176,836 8.96 % Variance (D) 50 Ohio Governor 1922 Carmi A. Thompson (R) - • Vic Donahey (D) Thompson (R) 803,300 49.43 % (R) Counties Won 48 • Donahey (D) 821,948 50.57 % (D) Counties Won 40 Other 551 0.03 % Variance (D) 18,648 1.15 % Variance (R) 8 Ohio Governor 1920 • Harry L. Davis (R) - Vic Donahey (D) • Davis (R) 1,039,835 51.91 % (R) Counties Won 60 Donahey (D) 918,962 45.88 % (D) Counties Won 28 Other 44,386 2.22 % Variance (R) 120,873 6.03 % Variance (R) 32 Ohio Governor 1918 Frank B. Willis (R) - • James M. Cox (D) Willis (R) 474,559 49.38 % (R) Counties Won 59 • Cox (D) 486,403 50.62 % (D) Counties Won 29 Other 0 0.00 % Variance (D) 11,844 1.23 % Variance (R) 30 Ohio Governor 1916 Frank B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Color Line in Ohio Public Schools, 1829-1890
    THE COLOR LINE IN OHIO PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 1829-1890 DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By LEONARD ERNEST ERICKSON, B. A., M. A, ****** The Ohio State University I359 Approved Adviser College of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is not the work of the author alone, of course, but represents the contributions of many persons. While it is impossible perhaps to mention every­ one who has helped, certain officials and other persons are especially prominent in my memory for their encouragement and assistance during the course of my research. I would like to express my appreciation for the aid I have received from the clerks of the school boards at Columbus, Dayton, Toledo, and Warren, and from the Superintendent of Schools at Athens. In a similar manner I am indebted for the courtesies extended to me by the librarians at the Western Reserve Historical Society, the Ohio State Library, the Ohio Supreme Court Library, Wilberforce University, and Drake University. I am especially grateful to certain librarians for the patience and literally hours of service, even beyond the high level customary in that profession. They are Mr. Russell Dozer of the Ohio State University; Mrs. Alice P. Hook of the Historical and Philosophical Society; and Mrs. Elizabeth R. Martin, Miss Prances Goudy, Mrs, Marion Bates, and Mr. George Kirk of the Ohio Historical Society. ii Ill Much of the time for the research Involved In this study was made possible by a very generous fellowship granted for the year 1956 -1 9 5 7, for which I am Indebted to the Graduate School of the Ohio State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Waldo TAYLOR
    Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange Mount Vernon Banner Historic Newspaper 1888 2-16-1888 Mount Vernon Democratic Banner February 16, 1888 Follow this and additional works at: https://digital.kenyon.edu/banner1888 Recommended Citation "Mount Vernon Democratic Banner February 16, 1888" (1888). Mount Vernon Banner Historic Newspaper 1888. 37. https://digital.kenyon.edu/banner1888/37 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mount Vernon Banner Historic Newspaper 1888 by an authorized administrator of Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. L. HARPER, EDITOR AND PROPRIETOR A FAMILY NEWSPAPER—DEVOTED TO NEWS, POLITICS, AGRICULTURE, LITERATURE. THE ARTS AND SCIENCES, EDUCATION, THE MARKETS, &c. $2.00 PER ANNUM, IN ADVANCE. VOLUME LT. MOUNT VERNON, OHIO: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1888. NUMBER 40. ESTABLISHED 19S1. Were They ‘Tree Traders,” Too? JOSEPH MEDILL ON THE TARIFF. Bob Ingersoll Says the Country is TILLIE AND LILLIE. A Ghastly Discovery. • Real Estate Transfer. Republican demagogues, (remarks Happy and that Cleveland will Chicago, Feb. 8.—A ghastly sight II. L. Curtis, eXr., to A. Fridel, lot HOWARD HARPER the Newark Advocate), raise a great He Says the Republican Party is be Nominated. The Similarity of Two Letters Gets met the gaze of Amos J. Snell’s hired in MtVernon................................. $ 300 00 Pledged to a Reduction. a Young Man in Trouble. Hugh Horn to Timothy Dudgeon, howl because the Democratic party, Washington, D. C. Feb. 8.—“I am man when he entered the house at 425 land in Clinton.............................
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Niall Palmer
    EnterText 1.1 NIALL PALMER “Muckfests and Revelries”: President Warren G. Harding in Fact and Fiction This article will assess the development of the posthumous reputation of President Warren Gamaliel Harding (1921-23) through an examination of key historical and literary texts in Harding historiography. The article will argue that the president’s image has been influenced by an unusual confluence of factors which have both warped history’s assessment of his administration and retarded efforts at revisionism. As a direct consequence, the stereotypical, deeply negative, portrait of Harding remains rooted in the nation’s consciousness and the “rehabilitation” afforded to many presidents by revisionist writers continues to be denied to the man still widely-regarded as the worst president of the twentieth century. “Historians,” Eugene Trani and David Wilson observed in 1977, “have not been gentle with Warren G. Harding.”1 In successive surveys of American political scientists, historians and journalists, undertaken to rank presidents by achievement, vision and leadership skills, the twenty-ninth president consistently comes last.2 The Chicago Sun- Times, publishing the findings of fifty-eight presidential historians and political scientists in November 1995, placed Warren Harding at the head of the list of “The Ten Worst” Niall Palmer: Muckfests and Revelries 155 EnterText 1.1 Presidents.3 A 1996 New York Times poll branded Harding an outright “failure,” alongside two presidents who presided over the pre-Civil War crisis, Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan. The academic merit and methodological underpinnings of such surveys are inevitably flawed. Nonetheless, in most cases, presidential status assessments are fluid, reflecting the fluctuations of contemporary opinion and occasional waves of academic revisionism.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations Ohio Department of Natural Resources
    D I V I S I O N OF W I L D L I F E 2007 2008 OHIO HUNTING& TRAPPING REGULATIONS OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES www.WildOhio.com 2006-2007 WHITETAIL DEER SEASON MAP ASHTABULA WILLIAMS FULTON LUCAS 880 LAKE GEAUGA 5096 686 851 OTTAWA 1537 TRUMBULL HENRY 355 CUYAHOGA 2434 DEFIANCE SANDUSKY ERIE LORAIN 517 1156 756 702 842 PORTAGE 3447 HURON 2483 MEDINA SUMMIT PAULDING 569 WOOD SENECA PUTNAM 2407 MAHONING 757 HANCOCK 1974 2386 1830 1451 1681 VAN WERT 691 1622 WYANDOT CRAWFORD RICHLANDASHLANDWAYNE 507 ALLEN STARK COLUMBIANA HARDIN 1868 11524129 2075 1900 4519 MERCER 740 3224 CARROLL AUGLAIZE 1406 MARION HOLMES MORROW 5008 607 677 LOGAN 841 KNOX 5732 7478 JEFFERSON SHELBY UNION 2074 6723 COSHOCTON TUSCARAWAS HARRISON DARKE 875 2209 956 DELAWARE LICKING 8656 6169 5743 CHAMPAIGN GUERNSEY MIAMI 1793 653 MUSKINGUM BELMONT 1655 FRANKLIN 6965 596 CLARK 7511 5371 PREBLE 912 FAIRFIELD PERRY 7386 MONTGOMERY 913 MONROE 592 NOBLE GREENE WAY 695 463 MADISON PICKA 3025 MORGAN 4493 4880 1047 FAYETTE 4738 1217 4272WASHINGTON BUTLER WARREN CLINTON 390 HOCKING The entire state ROSS 1588 1544 4803 ATHENS 5645 offers great potential 1010 VINTON HAMILTON 4266 5124 CLERMONT 3420 for a successful hunt. 1897 3025 PIKE MEIGS Included here are 3154 HIGHLAND 2558 JACKSON 4676 BROWN ADAMS 4196 GALLIA maps showing 3329 4199 SCIOTO Top 10 Counties where hunters 3012 4273 3012 for Deer Season found the greatest LAWRENCE success last year. OHIO AUDUBON SOCIETY Christmas 2006 SPRING TURKEY SEASON MAP ASHTABULA HARVEST NUMBERS BY COUNTY BY NUMBERS HARVEST WILLIAMS FULTON
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio National Guard Before the Militia Act of 1903
    THE OHIO NATIONAL GUARD BEFORE THE MILITIA ACT OF 1903 A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Cyrus Moore August, 2015 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Thesis written by Cyrus Moore B.S., Ohio University, 2011 M.A., Kent State University, 2015 Approved by Kevin J. Adams, Professor, Ph.D., Department of History Master’s Advisor Kenneth J. Bindas, Professor, Ph.D, Chair, Department of History James L Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter I. Republican Roots………………………………………………………19 II. A Vulnerable State……………………………………………………..35 III. Riots and Strikes………………………………………………………..64 IV. From Mobilization to Disillusionment………………………………….97 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….125 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………..136 Introduction The Ohio Militia and National Guard before 1903 The second half of the nineteenth century witnessed a profound change in the militia in the United States. Driven by the rivalry between modern warfare and militia tradition, the role as well as the ideology of the militia institution fitfully progressed beyond its seventeenth century origins. Ohio’s militia, the third largest in the country at the time, strove to modernize while preserving its relevance. Like many states in the early republic, Ohio’s militia started out as a sporadic group of reluctant citizens with little military competency. The War of the Rebellion exposed the serious flaws in the militia system, but also demonstrated why armed citizen-soldiers were necessary to the defense of the state. After the war ended, the militia struggled, but developed into a capable military organization through state-imposed reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record-Senate. 2581
    1897. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. 2581 SENATE. BILL INTRODUCED. Mr. ROACH int1·oduced a bill (S. 2385) to amend the act enti­ WEDNESDAY;July 14, 1897. tled "An act granting pensions to the soldiers and sailors of the The Senate met at 12 o'clock m. Mexican war, and for other purposes,"approved January 20, 1887; Prayer by Rev. J. W. DuFFEY, D. D., of the city of Washington. which was read twice by its title, and, with the accompanying The Journal of yesterday's proceedings was read and approved. papers, referred to the Committee on Pensions. BREAKWATER AT SAN PEDRO HARBOR. REFERENCE OF CLAIMS TO COMMITTEE ON CLAIMS. Mr. STEWART. I desire to enter a motion to reconsider the Mr. HALE. I ask for the adoption of the following order: Orde1·ed, That on all claims referred during the present session of Congress vote by whieh the concurrent resolution in regard to a break­ to the Committee on Appropriations, whether in the form of bills or amend­ water at San Pedro Harbor was agreed to. ments to appropriation bills, the committee js h ereby discharged from fur­ The VICE-PRESIDENT. Notice of the motion to reconsider ther consideration of the same, and they are hereby referred to the Commit- will be entered. tee on Claims. · Mr. WHITE. There is no mistake about the matter. I do not Mr. COCKRELL. That order has just been made. know exactly what the object of the Senator from Nevada is. I Mr. HALE. It has already been made? understand the Southern Pacific Railroad Company has some ob­ Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    THIRTIETH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1847, TO MARCH 3, 1849 FIRST SESSION—December 6, 1847, to August 14, 1848 SECOND SESSION—December 4, 1848, to March 3, 1849 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—GEORGE M. DALLAS, of Pennsylvania PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—DAVID R. ATCHISON, 1 of Missouri SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—ASBURY DICKINS, 2 of North Carolina SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—ROBERT BEALE, of Virginia SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—ROBERT C. WINTHROP, 3 of Massachusetts CLERK OF THE HOUSE—BENJAMIN B. FRENCH, of New Hampshire; THOMAS J. CAMPBELL, 4 of Tennessee SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—NEWTON LANE, of Kentucky; NATHAN SARGENT, 5 of Vermont DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—ROBERT E. HORNER, of New Jersey ALABAMA CONNECTICUT GEORGIA SENATORS SENATORS SENATORS 14 Arthur P. Bagby, 6 Tuscaloosa Jabez W. Huntington, Norwich Walter T. Colquitt, 18 Columbus Roger S. Baldwin, 15 New Haven 19 William R. King, 7 Selma Herschel V. Johnson, Milledgeville John M. Niles, Hartford Dixon H. Lewis, 8 Lowndesboro John Macpherson Berrien, 20 Savannah REPRESENTATIVES Benjamin Fitzgerald, 9 Wetumpka REPRESENTATIVES James Dixon, Hartford Thomas Butler King, Frederica REPRESENTATIVES Samuel D. Hubbard, Middletown John Gayle, Mobile John A. Rockwell, Norwich Alfred Iverson, Columbus Henry W. Hilliard, Montgomery Truman Smith, Litchfield John W. Jones, Griffin Sampson W. Harris, Wetumpka Hugh A. Haralson, Lagrange Samuel W. Inge, Livingston DELAWARE John H. Lumpkin, Rome George S. Houston, Athens SENATORS Howell Cobb, Athens Williamson R. W. Cobb, Bellefonte John M. Clayton, 16 New Castle Alexander H. Stephens, Crawfordville Franklin W. Bowdon, Talladega John Wales, 17 Wilmington Robert Toombs, Washington Presley Spruance, Smyrna ILLINOIS ARKANSAS REPRESENTATIVE AT LARGE John W.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly fi'om the original or copy submitted- Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aity type of conçuter printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to r i^ t in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9427761 Lest the rebels come to power: The life of W illiam Dennison, 1815—1882, early Ohio Republican Mulligan, Thomas Cecil, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • (July-November 1863) Lincoln's Popularit
    Chapter Thirty-one “The Signs Look Better”: Victory at the Polls and in the Field (July-November 1863) Lincoln’s popularity soared after the victories at Gettysburg, Vicksburg, and Port Hudson. His old friend from Illinois, Jesse W. Fell, reflected the changed public mood. In August, Fell told Lyman Trumbull that during the early stages of the war, “I did not like some things that were done, and many things that were not done, by the present Administration.” Along with most “earnest, loyal men, I too was a grumbler, because, as we thought, the Gov't. moved too slow.” But looking back, Fell acknowledged that “we are not now disposed to be sensorious [sic] to the ‘powers that be,’ even among ourselves.” To the contrary, “it is now pretty generally conceded, that, all things considered, Mr. Lincoln's Administration has done well.” Such “is the general sentiment out of Copperhead Circles.” Lincoln had been tried, and it was clear “that he is both honest and patriotic; that if he don't go forward as fast as some of us like, he never goes backwards.”1 To a friend in Europe, George D. Morgan explained that the president “is very popular and good men of all sides seem to regard him as the man for the place, for they see what one cannot see abroad, how difficult the position he has to fill, to keep 1 Fell to Lyman Trumbull, Cincinnati, 11 August 1863, Trumbull Papers, Library of Congress. 3378 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 2, Chapter 31 the border States quiet, to keep peace with the different generals, and give any satisfaction to the radicals.”2 One of those Radicals, Franklin B.
    [Show full text]
  • OBJ (Application/Pdf)
    WOODROW WILSON; HIS ROLE IN THE AMERICAN REJECTION OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ATLANTA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ROSA RICE HADLEY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY ATLANTA, GEORGIA MAY 1966 ia T 51 PREFACE This paper on the role of Thomas Woodrow Wilson in the American rejection of the League of Nations is an out¬ growth of an interest in the Lesgue of Nations. The bulk of this work was compiled from the speeches and utterances of Woodrow Wilson, Supplementary materials came from con¬ temporary writers, cabinet members, congressmen and jour¬ nalists of the Wilson Era. The author is deeply indebted to the staff of the Atlanta University and Atlanta Public Libraries for their aid and many courtesies extended during the research period of this work. Ü TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE ii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction * 1 Wilson, The Man* * • « 7 The European Horizon Darkens U II, PRELUDE TO THE LEAGUE 17 Enumeration of Fourteen Points • • • • Wilson Appeals to the Voters .... 17 Wilson Goes to Europe • •** 22 Versailles Treaty ... 25 III. THE FIGHT OVER TREATY RATIFICATION ... 3k The President Comes Home With . His Covenant 34 "Wilson Goes to the People 43 The Stricken President . 47 The Senate Fight 48 Conclusions 50 BIBLIOGRAPHY 5k lii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Whenever one encounters any mention of the League of Nations, inevitably there is also mention of Woodrow Wilson, twenty-eigth President of the United States. Wilson has been called the parent of this organization although his own country failed to join.
    [Show full text]