George Don (1764–1814) Rariflora Above Caenlochan, and in 1810 the Or Alternatively a Currier, Who Made Boots and Grass Elymus Caninus Var

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

George Don (1764–1814) Rariflora Above Caenlochan, and in 1810 the Or Alternatively a Currier, Who Made Boots and Grass Elymus Caninus Var BygoneBryologists Bygone Bryologists – George Don Lochnagar in 1801 he came across Cicerbita coming south from Aberdeenshire in the 17th alpina. In the following year he discovered Carex century. Alexander, however, was additionally George Don (1764–1814) rariflora above Caenlochan, and in 1810 the or alternatively a currier, who made boots and grass Elymus caninus var. donianus. For collecting shoes. This is one in a series of articles by Mark Lawley about prominent British and Irish some of these plants, Don used a pole 15 feet Alexander Don’s paternal grandfather James field bryologists of the past. Mark would be very pleased to learn of any information long, crowned with an iron straddle for hooking Don had married an Isabel Fairweather, whose them down from precipitous cliffs. brother George was a paternal great-grandfather which supplements its content. A Social and Biographical History of British and Irish In 1804, Don began to publish Herbarium of George Don’s mother. Thus, George’s parents Field-bryologists is also available online at www.britishbryologicalsociety.org.uk Britannicum, issuing four fascicles of 25 plants were distant cousins. George’s mother Isabella each year. Nine such instalments were issued was a daughter of George Fairweather (1710– Botanical career lived 200 years ago it is astonishing. Not only between 1804 and 1806, and a final one in 1812 1770) and Jean (née Brand, ca 1710–1749) George Don (senior) was the first botanist to was travelling far slower and more arduous or 1813. Extant copies are at the Royal Botanic who lived at Mains of Findowrie, near Brechin, extensively and repeatedly explore the Scottish than today, the study of mosses was still Gardens in Edinburgh, and at Oxford. In 1813, Angus. Jean Brand was a daughter of William Highlands. He lived in Angus for much of his poorly advanced, and bryologists would have Don published Account of the Native Plants in the Brand. life, but explored far and wide in the Caledonian had to rely on James Dickson’s Fascicularis county of Forfar, and the Animals to be found there In the early 1770s Alexander moved his family hills, reaching as far north and west as Skye and plantarum cryptogamicarum Britanniae (1785– in the Reverend James Headrick’s Agricultural to Forfar, 10 miles south-west of Menmuir, where Knoydart. As a youth, he discovered Seligeria 1801), or James Edward Smith’s accounts in Survey of the county of Angus. they lived in Little Causeway, a square off the donniana in Dupplin Den near Perth in the early English Botany (1790–1814). What did Don’s Some of Don’s dried plants are at Montrose West High Street. George may have combined 1780s. In 1804 he found Encalypta alpina on bryological library consist of? And did he own a Museum. The single surviving volume of his schooling with learning his father’s trade of Ben Lawers. He seems to have collected mainly microscope, or just rely on very acute vision and private herbarium contains nearly 300 specimens shoe-making, but then went to Dunblane to between 1780 and 1806, and in his native a hand lens in the field? Contemporary cottage- of monocotyledons, and is at the Department learn the trade of making clocks and watches. county of Angus he found – among others – the weavers (of whom there were many thousands in of Botany in Oxford. Dundee University There he also developed his botanical interests, following liverworts: Anastrophyllum donianum, Angus in Don’s time) used a lens at their work Archives contains a 13-page commonplace book and formed his first herbarium (now lost) which Haplomitrium hookeri, Herbertus stramineus and for examining and separating fibres, so Don Illustrations of Scottish Flora, chiefly of Forfarshire included mosses. Don’s affinity for plants won Targionia hypophylla, while his mosses from would have had no trouble acquiring a lens for and Fifeshire (ref: MS 103/3/5), and two pages out over his apprenticeship, and in 1779 he took Angus include Amblyodon dealbatus, Amphidium bryological study. detailing botanical purchases. a position as gardener at Dupplin Castle, about lapponicum, Bartramia halleriana, Brachythecium Don was highly accomplished in finding and Don’s correspondence is in the National 4 miles south-west of Perth. On days off work, reflexum, Catoscopium nigritum, Dicranodontium identifying lichens and vascular plants as well Library at Edinburgh, and his vasculum is in the Don explored the Ochil and Grampian moun- uncinatum, Dicranum spurium, Distichium as bryophytes. For example, in 1789 he found Meffan Institute, West High Street, Forfar. tains. While at Dupplin he met his future bride, inclinatum, Grimmia atrata, G. ramondii, Carex saxatilis on Ben Lomond and Bartsia Caroline Clementine Sophia Oliphant Stuart Hennediella heimii, Hygrohypnum duriusculum, alpina on Meall Ghaordie. In 1791 he met Family background, biography and social (?1767–1834), who lived at nearby Gask. With Isopterygiopsis pulchella, Kiaeria falcata, Meesia Robert Brown (1773–1858) of Montrose, and contacts names like these, she was very likely well born. uliginosa, Neckera pumila, Oncophorus virens, the two men discovered Scirpus hudsonianus on George Don senior was born at Ireland Farm, Oliphants had been gentry in Perthshire and loyal Plagiopus oederianus, Polytrichastrum longisetum, the Moss of Restennith, Angus. Don also found Menmuir, Angus (Forfarshire) in 1764, a son to the Scottish crown for centuries (see Dictionary Pseudocalliergon lycopodioides, Pterygoneurum Polygonatum verticillatum in Perthshire and in of Alexander Don (1717–1813) and Isabella of National Biography, DNB). This affinity ovatum, Ptilium crista-castrensis, Saelania 1793 he discovered Carex atrofusca, Minuartia (née Fairweather, 1738). Ireland Farm is now to the Scottish crown caused them difficulties at glaucescens, Splachnum vasculosum, Tayloria rubella, Myosotis alpestris and Sagina saginoides but a pile of ruined stones at the end of a rough the time of the Jacobite rising in the early and tenuis, Tetraplodon angustatus and Tortula with John Mackay (1772–1802) on Ben Lawers. track about 2 miles north of Menmuir, some middle 18th century, but they subsequently viridifolia. In Angus, he found Lychnis alpina at Meikle 5 miles north-west of Brechin. The Dons and managed to re-establish themselves to some This would be an impressive list for a bryol- Kilrannoch in 1795, as well as Homogyne alpina Fairweathers were respectable farmers of Angus, extent at Gask. The songwriter Carolina Oliphant ogist in the 21st century; for someone who and Oxytropis campestris in Glen Clova. On the Dons having settled at Edzell in Angus after (1766–1845) was born at Gask (see DNB). 42 FieldBryology No100 | Feb10 FieldBryology No100 | Feb10 43 BygoneBryologists Bygone Bryologists – George Don Lochnagar in 1801 he came across Cicerbita coming south from Aberdeenshire in the 17th alpina. In the following year he discovered Carex century. Alexander, however, was additionally George Don (1764–1814) rariflora above Caenlochan, and in 1810 the or alternatively a currier, who made boots and grass Elymus caninus var. donianus. For collecting shoes. This is one in a series of articles by Mark Lawley about prominent British and Irish some of these plants, Don used a pole 15 feet Alexander Don’s paternal grandfather James field bryologists of the past. Mark would be very pleased to learn of any information long, crowned with an iron straddle for hooking Don had married an Isabel Fairweather, whose them down from precipitous cliffs. brother George was a paternal great-grandfather which supplements its content. A Social and Biographical History of British and Irish In 1804, Don began to publish Herbarium of George Don’s mother. Thus, George’s parents Field-bryologists is also available online at www.britishbryologicalsociety.org.uk Britannicum, issuing four fascicles of 25 plants were distant cousins. George’s mother Isabella each year. Nine such instalments were issued was a daughter of George Fairweather (1710– Botanical career lived 200 years ago it is astonishing. Not only between 1804 and 1806, and a final one in 1812 1770) and Jean (née Brand, ca 1710–1749) George Don (senior) was the first botanist to was travelling far slower and more arduous or 1813. Extant copies are at the Royal Botanic who lived at Mains of Findowrie, near Brechin, extensively and repeatedly explore the Scottish than today, the study of mosses was still Gardens in Edinburgh, and at Oxford. In 1813, Angus. Jean Brand was a daughter of William Highlands. He lived in Angus for much of his poorly advanced, and bryologists would have Don published Account of the Native Plants in the Brand. life, but explored far and wide in the Caledonian had to rely on James Dickson’s Fascicularis county of Forfar, and the Animals to be found there In the early 1770s Alexander moved his family hills, reaching as far north and west as Skye and plantarum cryptogamicarum Britanniae (1785– in the Reverend James Headrick’s Agricultural to Forfar, 10 miles south-west of Menmuir, where Knoydart. As a youth, he discovered Seligeria 1801), or James Edward Smith’s accounts in Survey of the county of Angus. they lived in Little Causeway, a square off the donniana in Dupplin Den near Perth in the early English Botany (1790–1814). What did Don’s Some of Don’s dried plants are at Montrose West High Street. George may have combined 1780s. In 1804 he found Encalypta alpina on bryological library consist of? And did he own a Museum. The single surviving volume of his schooling with learning his father’s trade of Ben Lawers. He seems to have collected mainly microscope, or just rely on very acute vision and private herbarium contains nearly 300 specimens shoe-making, but then went to Dunblane to between 1780 and 1806, and in his native a hand lens in the field? Contemporary cottage- of monocotyledons, and is at the Department learn the trade of making clocks and watches.
Recommended publications
  • The Charles Knight-Joseph Hooker Correspondence
    A man tenax propositi: transcriptions of letters from Charles Knight to William Jackson Hooker and Joseph Dalton Hooker between 1852 and 1883 David J. Galloway Hon. Research Associate Landcare Research, and Te Papa Tongarewa [email protected] Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133J December 2013 Published by the Geoscience Society of New Zealand Inc, 2013 Information on the Society and its publications is given at www.gsnz.org.nz © Copyright David J. Galloway, 2013 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133J ISBN 978-1-877480-36-2 ISSN 2230-4495 (Online) ISSN 2230-4487 (Print) This document is available as a PDF file that can be downloaded from the Geoscience Society website at: http://www.gsnz.org.nz/information/misc-series-i-49.html Bibliographic Reference Galloway D.J. 2013: A man tenax propositi: transcriptions of letters from Charles Knight to William Jackson Hooker and Joseph Dalton Hooker between 1852 and 1883 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133J. 88 pages. A man tenax propositi: transcriptions of letters from Charles Knight to William Jackson Hooker and Joseph Dalton Hooker between 1852 and 1883 Contents Introduction 3 Charles Knight correspondence at Kew 5 Acknowledgements 6 Summaries of the letters 7 Transcriptions of the letters from Charles Knight 15 Footnotes 70 References 77 Figure 1: Dr Charles Knight FLS, FRCS 2 Figure 2: Group photograph including Charles Knight 2 Figure 3: Page of letter from Knight to Hooker 14 Table 1: Comparative chronology of Charles Knight, W.J. Hooker and J.D. Hooker 86 1 Figure 1: Dr Charles Knight FLS, FRCS Alexander Turnbull Library,Wellington, New Zealand ¼-015414 Figure 2: Group taken in Walter Mantell‟s garden about 1865 showing Charles Knight (left), John Buchanan and James Hector (right) and Walter Mantell and his young son, Walter Godfrey Mantell (seated on grass).
    [Show full text]
  • Home Home > History > Darwin and Wallace
    The Society Media & Events Membership Publications Collections Library Awards History Links Home Home > History > Darwin and Wallace 1 Carl Linnaeus Darwin, Wallace and the Linnean Society Sir James Edward Smith Darwin and Wallace Charles Darwin About the Darwin-Wallace Paper The Darwin-Wallace Paper Charles Darwin was elected a Fellow of the Linnean Society of London on 7 March 1854, nominated for (Complete) Fellowship by Thomas Bell, Sylvester Hanley, Edward Forbes, Robert Brown, John S. Henslow, James J. Bennett and A. White. He remained an active Fellow throughout his life, using the Library as a resource and reviewing papers submitted to the Society. We also received from him copies of his publications which now are a treasured part of the Library. He died on 19 April 1882 and is buried in Westminster Abbey. Alfred Russel Wallace Alfred Russel Wallace was elected to Fellowship of the Society somewhat later, on 18 January 1871 and remained a Fellow until his death on 7 November 1913. He was nominated for Fellowship by George Bentham, H.T.Stainton, J.D.Hooker, A.W.Bennett, S. Stevens, A. Muller, E.W.H. Holdsworth, A. Newton, W.H. Flower, J.W. Dunning, G.R.Gray, and E. Sheppard. By that time he was well established figure in natural history. The Charles Darwin Society is lucky to hold a number of his manuscripts, as well as much of his biological library, often with (1809 - 1882) interesting marginal annotations. The Darwin-Wallace Papers The opportunity to present the joint papers outlining evolutionary theory, with papers by both Darwin and Wallace, on 1 July 1858, arose because of the death of the Vice President, Robert Brown, on 10 June 1858.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial This Autumn We Have Been Celebrating the Bicentenary of the Birth of Charles Lyell (B
    THE LINNEAN I Editorial This autumn we have been celebrating the bicentenary of the birth of Charles Lyell (b. 14 November 1797) whose greatest contribution to the advancement of science was his Principles of Geology which first appeared during 1830-33 and subsequently went through 13 revisions. Although this work inspired both Darwin and Hooker and furnished Wallace “with the main features of the succession of species in time” - Lye11 could never bring himself to accept “the descent of man from the brutes”. Picture taken by Dr R. Spearman on the occasion ofthe Lyell Bicentenary lecture 31 July 1997. Left to right: G. Prance, W. Stearn CBE. W. Challoner, Jim Secord, S. Berry, M. Claridge, J. Hawkes (two extant PPLs missing. A. Cave & B. Gardiner). Lyell entered the great debate on man’s origins in 1863 with his book entitled Geological Evidences a5 to the Antiquity of Man, coincidentally the same year that T. H. Huxley published his work on the Zoological Evidence as to Man’s Place in Nature. Huxley’s oook brought him notoriety whereas Darwin was somewhat distressed to find that Lyell’s book gave him no stronger support of the mutability of species than a sentence beginning “If it should be rendered highly probable that species change by variation and natural selection....”. Darwin further confided ( 1863) to Hooker 2 THE LINNEAN “I must say how much disappointed I am that he hasn’t spoken out on species, still less on man.. ... The whole certainly struck me as a compilation, but of the highest quality, for when possible the facts have been verified on the spot, making it almost an original work.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Sir William Jackson Hooker1
    PROFESSOR SIR WILLIAM JACKSON HOOKER1 “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY 1. Disambiguation: This is not the William Hooker who was producing, in 1833, a NEW POCKET PLAN OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. HDT WHAT? INDEX WILLIAM J. HOOKER PROFESSOR SIR WILLIAM JACKSON HOOKER 1785 July 6, Wednesday: William Jackson Hooker was born in Norwich, a son of Joseph Hooker of Exeter. After being educated at the high school of Norwich his status as an independent educated gentleman of means would enable him to travel and to take up as a recreation the study of ornithology and entomology. On the recommendation of Sir James Edward Smith (whom he consulted respecting a rare moss), he would soon come to specialize in botany. NOBODY COULD GUESS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN NEXT William J. Hooker “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX PROFESSOR SIR WILLIAM JACKSON HOOKER WILLIAM J. HOOKER 1809 Summer: William Jackson Hooker initial botanical expedition, at the suggestion of Sir Joseph Banks, was to Iceland (the specimens he collected, and all notes and drawings, were destroyed by fire during a homeward voyage in which he came close in addition to losing his life). NO-ONE’S LIFE IS EVER NOT DRIVEN PRIMARILY BY HAPPENSTANCE “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project William J. Hooker HDT WHAT? INDEX WILLIAM J. HOOKER PROFESSOR SIR WILLIAM JACKSON HOOKER 1810 In London, the East India Dock Road and West India Dock Road opened (trade with India was becoming a real big deal). During this year and the following one William Jackson Hooker was making extensive preparations, and sacrifices which would prove financially serious, to be ready to accompany General Sir Robert Brownrigg, 1st Baronet GCB to the Ceylon crown colony of England — but then due to political upheaval this project became impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • George Anderson: from Calico Printing Alexander Von Humboldt Botanist and Early FLS to Lepidoptera and More…
    TheNEWSLETTER AND PROCEEDINGS Linnean OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Volume 32 Number 1 April 2016 Joseph Sidebotham: In Correspondence: George Anderson: From calico printing Alexander von Humboldt Botanist and early FLS to Lepidoptera and more… A forum for natural history The Linnean Society of London Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF UK Toynbee House, 92–94 Toynbee Road, Wimbledon SW20 8SL UK (by appointment only) +44 (0)20 7434 4479 www.linnean.org [email protected] @LinneanSociety President SECRETARIES COUNCIL Prof Paul Brakefi eld Scienti fi c The Offi cers () Vice Presidents Prof Simon Hiscock Vice Presidents Prof Juliet Brodie Dr Malcolm Scoble Ms Rosie Atkins Dr Paul Bates Dr Malcolm Scoble Editorial Prof Mark Seaward Dr Francis Brearley Prof Mark Chase FRS Prof Max Telford Prof Anthony K Campbell Ms Laura D'Arcy Treasurer Collecti ons Dr John David Prof Jeff rey Duckett Prof Gren Ll Lucas OBE Dr Michael Fay Treasurer-Elect Strategy Dr Zerina Johanson Ms Debbie Wright Prof David Cutler Dr Michael R Wilson THE TEAM Executi ve Secretary Librarian Conservator Dr Elizabeth Rollinson Mrs Lynda Brooks Ms Janet Ashdown Financial Controller & Deputy Librarian Special Publicati ons Manager Membership Offi cer Mrs Elaine Charwat Ms Leonie Berwick Mr Priya Nithianandan Archivist Emerita Educati on Offi cer Buildings & Offi ce Manager Ms Gina Douglas Ms Hazel Leeper Ms Victoria Smith Communicati ons & Events Room Hire & Membership Educati on Project Offi cer Manager Ms Alicia Fernandez Assistant Ms Tati ana Franco Mr Ross Ziegelmeier Editor Publishing in The Linnean Ms Gina Douglas The Linnean is published twice a year, in April and October.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Road to the Origin with Darwin, Hooker, and Gray
    On the Road to the Origin with Darwin, Hooker, and Gray DUNCAN M. PORTER Department of Biology Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 INTRODUCTION I began this paper intending to write a short essay with the title "Plant Geography in The Origin of Species." However, I find that it has evolved into something quite different. Since the summer of 1989, when the original title was chosen, I have read some unpublished letters at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University that led me to substitute the present title. Much of the present paper now consists of excerpts from letters between Charles Darwin (1809-1882), Asa Gray (1810-1888), and Joseph Dalton Hooker (1817-1911). They are relevant to my subject because Darwin depended upon Gray and Hooker, botanists respectively at Harvard and Kew, for much of the information on phytogeography in the Origin. I intend to pursue that theme in a later publication. I do not apologize for these long excerpts, as I think that the story is best told in the words of the protagonists. Also, they show that Darwin was not operating in a vacuum. Letters of Asa Gray was published in 1893 (J. Gray 1893), and Life and Letters of Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker in 1918 (L. Huxley 1918). In spite of the large numbers of letters contained in these four volumes, many of the letters that I quote from have never been published. Apparently, they were not deemed of sufficient interest to the general audience that was presumed to comprise the readers of such collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Lyell and Gideon Mantell, 1821 - 1852: Their Quest for Elite Status in English Geology
    CHARLES LYELL AND GIDEON MANTELL, 1821 - 1852: THEIR QUEST FOR ELITE STATUS IN ENGLISH GEOLOGY. Alan John Wennerbom A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Unit for the History University of Sydney and Philosophy of Science May 1999 SYNOPSIS An analysis of the correspondence between Charles Lyell and Gideon Mantell from 1821 to 1852, in conjunction with other manuscript material, highlights the contrasting backgrounds and geological careers of the two men. It is also characterised by two underlying themes: the nature and timing of their geological work; and the influence of various social factors on their career plans and desire to achieve high social and scientific status. In turn, these points raise several wider issues and inter-related questions concerning the following aspects of English geology in the first half of the nineteenth century. · When, why and how did an elite group of geologists emerge in England during this period? Who were its members and what were their characteristics in common? · What was the nature and scope of the geological work carried out by the identified elite? In what way did it differ from Mantell’s? · What social and other barriers did Mantell encounter in his search for scientific and social status? What were the critical factors? In this thesis these issues are examined on a decade-by-decade basis, in three main chapters, as a prelude to examining the central question of why Mantell, unlike Lyell, did not achieve the status of an elite geologist. First, an elite group of English geologists is identified through a series of prosopographic and ‘screening’ analyses of all members of council of the Geological Society of London (GSL).
    [Show full text]