I OH, SAY CAN't YOU SEE? by Brittany Wallace a Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I OH, SAY CAN't YOU SEE? by Brittany Wallace a Thesis OH, SAY CAN’T YOU SEE? by Brittany Wallace A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences with a Concentration in Writing Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, Florida May 2018 i OH, SAY CAN’T YOU SEE? by Brittany Wallace This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Professor Rachel Luria, and has been approved by the members of her/his supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ___________________________ Professor Rachel Luria ___________________________ Dr. Gavin Sourgen ___________________________ Dean Ellen Goldey, Wilkes Honors College ___________ Date ii ABSTRACT Author: Brittany Wallace Title: Oh, Say Can’t You See? Institution: Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Professor Rachel Luria Degree: Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences Concentration: Writing Year: 2018 The United States of America has long prided itself on its values of freedom and justice, but recent movements have pushed back against the notion that all are equal and free under the U.S. flag. Disenfranchised Americans across the country are advocating for everything from racial justice and immigrant rights, to white supremacy and isolationism. These calls for change, no matter their Rightness or Wrongness, call into question the true ideals of the land of the free and the home of the brave. Oh, Say Can’t You See? is a collection of nonfiction essays that examine what it means to be American through discussion of themes such as gender inequality, gun violence, immigration, and other salient issues. iii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I must thank one special person, someone who inspired in me a strong motivation to interrogate my feelings toward my country and its supposed values: Donald J. Trump. Thank you for being the perfect catalyst to jumpstart my undergraduate thesis and for being the best part of any late-night talk show. I thank Professor Rachel Luria for her never-ending patience with my neuroses— Will I ever actually finish this thesis? Is it going to be any good? Oh god, I’m breaking out in stress hives. Her guidance and support have been invaluable throughout the writing process. I thank Dr. Gavin Sourgen for his second readership, and for agreeing to read this thesis while moving to and settling back into London with two children under the age of four. Finally, I thank Dr. Harrawood, or Michael, as he prefers. I am forever grateful for his knowledge, friendship, and encouragement. Without him, I’m not sure where I would be today. I thank the strongest members of my support system—my parents and my grandmother—for their love and encouragement. They have been, since day one, my biggest fans, my best friends, and my most resolute allies. There aren’t enough words in any language to express my gratitude for them. I thank my boyfriend, Sean, for being my sounding board, my confidant, and my best friend. He listened to my anger-fueled rants on any given topic and helped me turn those garbled thoughts into cogent ideas. He held me while I cried during a midnight shift iv at work because I was so scared I couldn’t get this thesis done, and he celebrated with me when I finally did get it done. I thank my friends, those near and those far, who offered advice, topic ideas, and snacks when I needed them most. I especially thank Yari Batista for titling this collection during an impromptu brainstorming session. Finally, I thank my fellow Americans. I thank those who were born here, who were brought here, who sought refuge here, and who immigrated here. I thank those who work hard, whether it be professionally or personally, to make their lives—our lives— better. I thank those who smile at strangers, who hold open doors, who give compliments to passersby just because. I thank those who, amidst the fire and fury of the modern political climate, make me feel a little bit better about the world we are building together. v Table of Contents Foreword.…………………………………………………………………..……..1 A Letter to the Daughter I Might Never Have…..…………………………..…....5 I Came in 350 Pieces…………………………………………………….………13 One Nation, Under Gun……………………………………………..……….….14 I’m Here for the Ladies………………………………………………………….28 This Is What Democracy Looks Like…….............………………………….….35 Afterword………………………………………………………………………..43 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………..45 vi Foreword On the night of November 8, 2016, I sat, crossed-legged and fixated on the television, on my roommate’s bed. My 9-week-old puppy was curled in my lap, unaware that U.S. history was about to be made. I had hoped it would be made by a woman, but as has been a centuries-old theme in the United States, the woman was trumped—quite literally—by a domineering, self-serving man. The following day was somber, quiet, still; I attended Dr. Kevin Lanning’s political psychology class discussion, which was at once mournful, heartening, and reflective. We talked about what might have gone wrong, and we talked about what could have been done to prevent those things. Mostly, we listened: to Dr. Lanning, to each other, to ourselves, in this moment of sharp disappointment. That discussion, and the countless others I had with friends and family moving forward, inspired this collection. I was motivated in part by the monstrosity that was the 2016 presidential election—the attacks by Donald Trump on people with disabilities and people of color, the largely dismissive response to said candidate’s problematic glorification of sexual assault, the voracious appetite for some form of misguided revenge against historically disadvantaged people—but also by my newfound fear of what was (and is) to come. I, like many others, worry that our country is in shambles, and not for the reasons Trump spouted as part of his platform. Our country is in shambles because of the fear that fueled Trump’s campaign and ultimate election. I do not know these fears; I have never had to worry about someone “taking my job” or being a worker of a bygone industry, struggling to make ends meet. I am a white female born to an upper middle-class family, with both parents contributing to the 1 household. I have lived a privileged life, so I have not lived these experiences of fear. But I have lived the experience of being a girl—now woman—in this country. I have lived the experience of worrying for my friends who immigrated here when they were children, who are now fearful of their status in America. I have also lived the experience of encountering incredibly kind and selfless people of all walks of life. I have lived the experience of helping a dear family friend study for her citizenship test, a test she took after more than thirty years of living in the United States. I have lived the experience of knowing that there are good and honest and hardworking people in this country who deserve a fighting chance no matter their race, their gender, their sexuality, or any other socially constructed barrier that might hinder their pursuit of happiness. I have lived these things, and in writing this collection, I have been able to reflect more deeply on how I feel about the issues we face today. Fair warning: There are things you’ll read in the following pages that may make your blood boil because you don’t agree with me (or because you do). Some things may make you sad; many, many things in this collection make me sad, too. That was the hardest part about writing these essays, but it was also what made writing them worthwhile. I came face to face with my country and all its pestilent wounds—both those it created and those it sustained—and I came face to face with how simultaneously ashamed and grateful I am to call myself an American. There are a few things I ask of you now that you have committed to reading on. First, do not mistake me as someone who knows everything, or even thinks she knows everything. I am no historian, and I am no expert researcher, so I do not pretend to have 2 any answers to the questions that prompted these essays. I also do not want you to take anything you read here as fact—unless, of course, it is fact; after all, what would any cogent opinion be without facts? But I do want you to read what follows as a sort of call to action. This collection is my attempt at tackling some of America’s greatest issues: sexism, gun violence, immigration, and a few more. There are things I chose not to include, either because of a lack of experience or knowledge in their particular realms, or because it is simply impossible to give justice to every issue America faces in ten volumes, much less one. I also ask for forgiveness in advance should I misspeak or misrepresent someone or something. I strive to be the kind of writer who is thorough and honest, but it is also a human’s job to muck it up every now and again, and, last time I checked, I am human. In these essays, I try to avoid generalizations, and I try to avoid making statements about intersectional ties with which I have no experience. But the truth is that I have opinions, and I have implicit biases whose specifics I’m unaware of, and I can’t know everything about a given subject.
Recommended publications
  • Mi Científica Favorita 2
    MI CIENTÍFICA FAVORITA 2 GOBIERNO MINISTERIO GOBIERNO MINISTERIO GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE CIENCIA, INNOVACIÓN DE ESPAÑA DE CIENCIA, INNOVACIÓN DE ESPAÑA DE CIENCIA, INNOVACIÓN Y UNIVERSIDADES Y UNIVERSIDADES Y UNIVERSIDADES MI CIENTÍFICA FAVORITA 2 FAVORITA MI CIENTÍFICA MI CIENTÍFICA FAVORITA 2 MI CIENTÍFICA FAVORITA 2 Instituto de Ciencias Matemáticas (CSIC, UAM, UC3M, UCM) GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE CIENCIA, INNOVACIÓN Y UNIVERSIDADES Índice 07 Presentación 08 Agnodice 10 María Sibylla Merian 12 Emilie du Châtelet 14 Mary Anning 16 Sofia Kovalevskaya 20 Hertha Ayrton 22 Nettie Stevens 24 Henrietta Swan Leavitt 26 Mileva Maric´ 28 Lise Meitner 34 Emmy Noether 36 Inge Lehmann 38 Janaki Ammal 40 Grace Hopper 42 Rachel Carson 44 Rita Levi-Montalcini 46 Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin 50 Chien-Shiung Wu 52 Ángeles Alvariño 54 Jane Cooke Wright 56 Stephanie Kwolek 58 Inmaculada Paz Andrade 60 Gabriela Morreale 64 Valentina Tereshkova 66 Lynn Margulis 70 María del Carmen Maroto Vela 72 Wangari Maathai Matemáticas 74 Françoise Barré-Sinoussi Física 76 Ingrid Daubechies Química Biología 80 Ameenah Gurib-Fakim Ciencias de la Tierra 82 Lisa Randall Medicina 84 Begoña Vila Ingeniería e informática 86 Sara Zahedi Nota: 89 Glosario de términos Ciertas fechas se desconocen, por ello no aparecen indicadas en las líneas de tiempo. 92 Fuentes INTRODUCCIÓN Las mujeres han contribuido al desarrollo de la ciencia a lo largo de toda la historia aunque, en muchas ocasiones, su trabajo no ha sido reconocido como se merecía. En este libro presentamos la vida y obra de algunas de ellas, es- cogidas por estudiantes de 5º y 6º de primaria de centros educativos de toda España como sus científicas favoritas.
    [Show full text]
  • Mateen in Orlando That Killed 49 Reminds Us That Despite All These FBI Investigations, Sometimes America’S Homegrown Terrorists Will Still Slip Through the Net
    The Future of Counterterrorism: Addressing the Evolving Threat to Domestic Security. House Committee on Homeland Security Committee, Counterterrorism and Intelligence Subcommittee February 28, 2017 Peter Bergen , Vice President, Director of International Security and Fellows Programs, New America; Professor of Practice, Arizona State University; CNN National Security Analyst. This testimony is organized into 8 sections 1. What is the terrorism threat to the U.S.? 2. What is the terrorism threat posed by citizens of proposed travel-ban countries? 3. An examination of attacks in the U.S. that are inspired or enabled by ISIS. 4. An assessment of who ISIS’ American recruits are and why they sign up; 5. An assessment of how ISIS is doing; 6. An examination of what the big drivers of jihadist terrorism are; 7. A discussion of some future trends in terrorism; 8. Finally, what can be done to reduce the threat from jihadist terrorists? 1. What is the terrorism threat to the United States? The ISIS attacks in Brussels last year and in Paris in 2015 underlined the threat posed by returning Western “foreign fighters” from the conflicts in Syria and Iraq who have been trained by ISIS or other jihadist groups there. Six of the attackers in Paris were European nationals who had trained with ISIS in Syria. Yet in the United States, the threat from returning foreign fighters is quite limited. According to FBI Director James Comey, 250 Americans have gone or attempted to go to Syria. This figure is far fewer than the estimated 6,900 who have traveled to Syria from Western nations as a whole — the vast majority from Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Theologians, Poets, and Lone Wolves: Mapping Medium-Specific Epistemologies of Radicalization
    International Journal of Communication 14(2020), 1849–1867 1932–8036/20200005 Theologians, Poets, and Lone Wolves: Mapping Medium-Specific Epistemologies of Radicalization BRIAN T. HUGHES American University, USA Examinations into the roots of Islamist terrorism have frequently presented the phenomenon as a result of either perverting political–religious epistemologies into distorted, caricatured fundamentalisms, or, alternatively, as a return to form, whereby a pure, root ideology/metaphysic is rediscovered. The former approach reflects a discourse rooted in print media and characterized by logical argumentation, linear chronology, and deference to the text. The latter approach reflects a discourse rooted in modes of secondary orality, which posit a font of ideal essence that precedes expression. The figure of the digitally engaged lone wolf undermines these discourses. His violent extremism appears only Islamically inflected through an accretion of contradictory mediated encounters linking representations of violence, Islam, and the lone wolf himself. This article argues that a new approach and discourse should therefore emerge, specific to the hypertextual and rhizomatic qualities of multiplicity and contradiction that characterize the digitally engaged lone wolf. Keywords: terrorism, extremism, ISIS, Islamophobia, radicalization, discourse, medium theory, hypermedia, affect Scholars have identified successive waves of terrorist tactics and ideological pretexts in both the contemporary Islamist domain (Esposito, 2003b; Kepel, 2002;
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E632 HON
    E632 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks April 16, 2008 But in the gathering that I attended the next A PROCLAMATION HONORING Seung-Hui Cho’s information been handled day on campus, I saw a remarkable trans- COACH LINDA HOBART FOR properly he would have been prevented from formation. I saw a community touched by the COACHING THE TUSCARAWAS purchasing the weapons used in the shooting. deaths of 32 people—students and professors COUNTY ROCKETS SPECIAL Responding to pressure from these citizen ad- all—turned into a friendship community unlike OLYMPICS BASKETBALL TEAM vocates, Congress passed the NICS Improve- anywhere else. And then the world began TO WINNING THE OHIO DIVISION ments Act, a law providing funding to States to sharing its hopes that the Almighty would IV STATE BASKETBALL CHAM- insure that mental health records are added transmit healing to each and every person PIONSHIP efficiently to the national background check touched in some way by the heartbreak that system. had befallen Virginia Tech. HON. ZACHARY T. SPACE This week, I had the pleasure of meeting yesterday with a survivor of the Virginia Tech One cannot help but reach out to our fellow OF OHIO massacre. Her name is Lily Habtu. Lily was man at times such as those like April 16, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES shot in the jaw and arm during the violent 2007. The magnitude with which the globe Wednesday, April 16, 2008 melee. She described how the events of that embraced Virginia Tech in its ultimate time of Mr. SPACE. Madam Speaker: day have forever changed her life.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Shootings and Social Media Discourses of Sympathy and Policy
    Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Whose Lives Matter? Mass Shootings and Social Media Discourses of Sympathy and Policy, 2012–2014 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article-abstract/24/4/182/5489530 by guest on 07 August 2019 Yini Zhang1, Dhavan Shah1, Jordan Foley1, Aman Abhishek1, Josephine Lukito1, Jiyoun Suk1, Sang Jung Kim1, Zhongkai Sun2, Jon Pevehouse3, and Christine Garlough4 1 School of Journalism & Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA 2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA 3 Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA 4 Department of Gender and Women’s Studies, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA This study focuses on the outpouring of sympathy in response to mass shootings and the contesta- tion over gun policy on Twitter from 2012 to 2014 and relates these discourses to features of mass shooting events. We use two approaches to Twitter text analysis—hashtag grouping and super- vised machine learning (ML)—to triangulate an understanding of intensity and duration of “thoughts and prayers,” gun control, and gun rights discourses. We conduct parallel time series analyses to predict their temporal patterns in response to features of mass shootings. Our analyses reveal that while the total number of victims and child deaths consistently predicted public griev- ing and calls for gun control, public shootings consistently predicted the defense of gun rights. Further, the race of victims and perpetrators affected the levels of public mourning and policy debates, with the loss of black lives and the violence inflicted by white shooters generating less sympathy and policy discourses.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditing the Cost of the Virginia Tech Massacre How Much We Pay When Killers Kill
    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS/M ASSOCIATED THE AR Y AL Y ta FF ER Auditing the Cost of the Virginia Tech Massacre How Much We Pay When Killers Kill Anthony Green and Donna Cooper April 2012 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Auditing the Cost of the Virginia Tech Massacre How Much We Pay When Killers Kill Anthony Green and Donna Cooper April 2012 Remembering those we lost The Center for American Progress opens this report with our thoughts and prayers for the 32 men and women who died on April 16, 2007, on the Virginia Tech campus in Blacksburg, Virginia. We light a candle in their memory. Let the loss of those indispensable lives allow us to examine ways to prevent similar tragedies. — Center for American Progress Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Determining the cost of the Virginia Tech massacre 7 Virginia Tech’s costs 14 Commonwealth of Virginia’s costs 16 U.S. government costs 17 Health care costs 19 What can we learn from spree killings? 24 Analysis of the background check system that failed Virginia Tech 29 Policy recommendations 36 The way forward 38 About the authors and acknowledgements 39 Appendix A: Mental history of Seung-Hui Cho 45 Appendix B: Brief descriptions of spree killings, 1984–2012 48 Endnotes Introduction and summary Five years ago, on April 16, 2007, an English major at Virginia Tech University named Seung-Hui Cho gunned down and killed 32 people, wounded another 17, and then committed suicide as the police closed in on him on that cold, bloody Monday. Since then, 12 more spree killings have claimed the lives of another 90 random victims and wounded another 92 people who were in the wrong place at the wrong time when deranged and well-armed killers suddenly burst upon their daily lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S8188
    S8188 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE November 30, 2015 the three holds I have on ambassa- to be with our families and give thanks Republicans to consider calling on the dorial nominations: Mr. Samuel Heins, for all of the great goodness we have floor of the Senate—in light of all of who is nominated to be the U.S. Am- had showered on us as individuals and this gun violence—commonsense re- bassador to Norway, and Ms. Azita those lucky enough to live in this great forms that would keep guns out of the Raji, who is nominated to be the U.S. Nation, but for many families this was hands of dangerous people. Ambassador to Sweden. I believe both a painful holiday weekend. It is sober- Whether or not you own a gun, are qualified to represent our Nation ing to realize how many American fam- whether or not you hunt, whatever abroad, and we have significant inter- ilies have their lives impacted by gun your view is of the Constitution, can’t ests in Scandinavia. My hope is that violence in America every single day. we all basically agree that people who both nominees receive a vote and are Sadly, the past holiday weekend was have been convicted of a felony and confirmed in the Senate sooner rather no exception. those who are mentally unstable than later. In my home State of Illinois, in the should not be allowed to buy a gun? I will retain, however, the hold on city of Chicago, gun violence has taken That, to me, is just common sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 114 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 162 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JANUARY 7, 2016 No. 4 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, January 11, 2016, at 2 p.m. House of Representatives THURSDAY, JANUARY 7, 2016 The House met at 10 a.m. and was ican workers who seek jobs that pay This claimed labor shortage is unsup- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- enough to support their families. ported by jobs or wage data and is po- pore (Mr. LAHOOD). In December, on less than 72 hours’ litical bunk. Per Federal labor statis- f notice, Congress and President Obama tics, 57 percent—57 percent—of Ameri- shoved down the throats of Americans cans without a high school diploma had DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO a 2,000-page, financially irresponsible, no job in 2015’s second quarter. That TEMPORE $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill that bears repeating. Fifty-seven percent of The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- not only risks America’s solvency, it Americans without a high school di- fore the House the following commu- also threatens American jobs for Amer- ploma had no job in 2015’s second quar- nication from the Speaker: ican workers. ter. That is a lot of Americans who Under old law, 66,000 H–2B foreign WASHINGTON, DC, would love to have those jobs President January 7, 2016. worker visas could be issued each year.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Women Scientists Who Were Snubbed Due to Sexism Despite Enormous Progress in Recent Decades, Women Still Have to Deal with Biases Against Them in the Sciences
    6 Women Scientists Who Were Snubbed Due to Sexism Despite enormous progress in recent decades, women still have to deal with biases against them in the sciences. BY JANE J. LEE, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC PUBLISHED MAY 19, 2013 In April, National Geographic News published a story about the letter in which scientist Francis Crick described DNA to his 12-year-old son. In 1962, Crick was awarded a Nobel Prize for discovering the structure of DNA, along with fellow scientists James Watson and Maurice Wilkins. Several people posted comments about our story that noted one name was missing from the Nobel roster: Rosalind Franklin, a British biophysicist who also studied DNA. Her data were critical to Crick and Watson's work. But it turns out that Franklin would not have been eligible for the prize—she had passed away four years before Watson, Crick, and Wilkins received the prize, and the Nobel is never awarded posthumously. But even if she had been alive, she may still have been overlooked. Like many women scientists, Franklin was robbed of recognition throughout her career (See her section below for details.) She was not the first woman to have endured indignities in the male- dominated world of science, but Franklin's case is especially egregious, said Ruth Lewin Sime, a retired chemistry professor at Sacramento City College who has written on women in science. Over the centuries, female researchers have had to work as "volunteer" faculty members, seen credit for significant discoveries they've made assigned to male colleagues, and been written out of textbooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Aryan Nations Deflates
    HATE GROUP MAP & LISTING INSIDE PUBLISHED BY SPRING 2016 // ISSUE 160 THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER PLUS: ARYAN NATIONS DEFLATES ‘SOVEREIGNS’ IN MONTANA EDITORIAL A Year of Living Dangerously BY MARK POTOK Anyone who read the newspapers last year knows that suicide and drug overdose deaths are way up, less edu- 2015 saw some horrific political violence. A white suprem- cated workers increasingly are finding it difficult to earn acist murdered nine black churchgoers in Charleston, S.C. a living, and income inequality is at near historic lev- Islamist radicals killed four U.S. Marines in Chattanooga, els. Of course, all that and more is true for most racial Tenn., and 14 people in San Bernardino, Calif. An anti- minorities, but the pressures on whites who have his- abortion extremist shot three people to torically been more privileged is fueling real fury. death at a Planned Parenthood clinic in It was in this milieu that the number of groups on Colorado Springs, Colo. the radical right grew last year, according to the latest But not many understand just how count by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The num- bad it really was. bers of hate and of antigovernment “Patriot” groups Here are some of the lesser-known were both up by about 14% over 2014, for a new total political cases that cropped up: A West of 1,890 groups. While most categories of hate groups Virginia man was arrested for allegedly declined, there were significant increases among Klan plotting to attack a courthouse and mur- groups, which were energized by the battle over the der first responders; a Missourian was Confederate battle flag, and racist black separatist accused of planning to murder police officers; a former groups, which grew largely because of highly publicized Congressional candidate in Tennessee allegedly conspired incidents of police shootings of black men.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT, STATE of COLORADO 2 East 14Th Ave., Denver, Colorado 80203 Original Proceeding Pursuant to C.A.R
    SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 2 East 14th Ave., Denver, Colorado 80203 Original Proceeding Pursuant to C.A.R. 21 DATE FILED: February 16, 2016 4:49 PM El Paso County Dist. Court, Case No. 2015CR5795 Honorable Gilbert Martinez, Chief Judge In re: People v. Robert Lewis Dear, Jr. PETITIONERS: ABC, Inc; The Associated Press; Cable News Network, Inc. (“CNN”); CBS News, a division of CBS Broadcasting Inc., and KCNC-TV, owned and operated by CBS Television Stations Inc.; Colorado Broadcasters Association; Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition; Colorado Press Association; Colorado Springs Independent; The Denver Post; Dow Jones & Company; First Look Media, Inc.; Fox News Network, LLC; Gannett Co., Inc.; The Gazette; KDVR-TV, Channel 21; KKTV-TV, Channel 11; KMGH-TV, Channel 7; KRDO-TV, Channel 13; KUSA- TV, Channel 9; KWGN-TV, Channel 2; NBCUniversal Media, LLC; The New York Times Company; The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press; Rocky Mountain PBS; The E.W. Scripps Company; TEGNA, Inc.; Tribune Media Company, and the Washington Post Company, and RESPONDENTS: District Court for the Fourth Judicial District of Colorado (the Hon. Gilbert Martinez, Chief Judge, presiding). COURT USE ONLY CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN, Attorney General FREDERICK R. YARGER, Solicitor General* GRANT T. SULLIVAN, Assistant Solicitor General* Case No.: 2016SA13 MATTHEW D. GROVE, Assistant Solicitor General* 1300 Broadway, 6th Floor Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (720) 508-6349 (Sullivan) / 6157 (Grove) Fax: (720) 508-6041 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Registration Numbers: 39479, 40151, 34269 *Counsel of Record THE HONORABLE GILBERT MARTINEZ’S ANSWER TO ORDER AND RULE TO SHOW CAUSE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that this brief complies with all requirements of C.A.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Orlando Shooting: Motivation of a Mass Murderer (Duration 16:05) in June 2016, a Lone Gunman Opened Fire in a Gay Nightclub in Orlando, Florida
    IN THIS ISSUE Orlando Shooting: Motivation of a Mass Murderer (Duration 16:05) In June 2016, a lone gunman opened fire in a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida. Three hours later 50 people were dead — including the gunman. The attack is now considered the largest mass shooting in U.S. history. But two questions remain: What was the shooter’s motive and how do we stop such future attacks? News in Review Study Modules Related CBC Programs Parliament Hill Shootings, December 2014 Are RCMP Officers Outgunned? Justin Bourque's Violent Rage, December 2014 Code Orange U.S. Gun Debate, April 2013 Colorado Shooting Rampage, September 2012 A Gunman Attacks Students in Montreal, October 2006 Credits News in Review is produced by CBC News Resource Guide Writer/Editor: Sean Dolan Host: Michael Serapio Packaging Producer: Marie-Hélène Savard Associate Producer: Agathe Carrier Supervising Manager: Laraine Bone Visit us at our website at curio.ca/newsinreview , where you will find an electronic version of this resource guide and an archive of all previous News in Review seasons. As a companion resource, we recommend that students and teachers access CBC News Online, a multimedia current news source that is found on the CBC’s home page at cbc.ca/news/. Closed Captioning News in Review programs are closed captioned for the hearing impaired, for English as a Second Language students, or for situations in which the additional on-screen print component will enhance learning. CBC Learning authorizes the reproduction of material contained in this resource guide for educational purposes. Please identify the source.
    [Show full text]