IPEDS Data Feedback Report 2020.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IPEDS Data Feedback Report 2020.Pdf Image description. Cover Image End of image description. What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from all institutions that provide postsecondary education and are eligible to receive Title IV funding across the United States and other U.S. jurisdictions. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/), an online tool to aid in the college search process. Additional information about IPEDS can be found on the website at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? The figures in this report provide a selection of indicators for your institution to compare with a group of similar institutions. The figures draw from the data collected during the 2019-20 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. The inside cover of this report lists the pre-selected comparison group of institutions and the criteria used for their selection. The Methodological Notes at the end of the report describe additional information about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previously released Data Feedback Reports from 2005 and customize this 2020 report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To learn how to customize the 2020 report, visit this resource page https://nces.ed.gov/Ipeds/Help/View/2. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report, visit the ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds and click on Data Feedback Report. Central Texas College Killeen, TX Central Texas College COMPARISON GROUP Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s indicators. If your institution did not define a custom comparison group for this report by July 13, 2020 NCES selected a comparison group for you. (In this case, the characteristics used to define the comparison group appears below.) The customized Data Feedback Report function available at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/ can be used to reproduce the figures in this report using different peer groups. The custom comparison group chosen by Central Texas College includes the following 9 institutions: Blinn College (Brenham, TX) Coastline Community College (Fountain Valley, CA) El Paso Community College (El Paso, TX) Fayetteville Technical Community College (Fayetteville, NC) McLennan Community College (Waco, TX) Midlands Technical College (West Columbia, SC) Rio Salado College (Tempe, AZ) Temple College (Temple, TX) University of Maryland Global Campus (Adelphi, MD) The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas: Topic Area Figures Pages 1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) [No charts applicable] 2) Student Enrollment 1, 2 and 3 3 3) Awards 4 4 4) Charges and Net Price 5 and 6 4 5) Student Financial Aid 7 and 8 4 and 5 6) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 5, 6, 7 and 8 8) Finance 18 and 19 9 9) Staff 20 and 21 9 10) Libraries* 22 and 23 10 *These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFRs), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2 Central Texas College Figure 1. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2019 Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled American Percent. Indian or Alaska Native. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1. Median (N=9) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Asian. institution 3. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Black or African Group American. Median (N=9) 2. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 26. Median (N=9) 12. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Hispanic/ institution Latino. 27. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Native Hawaiian Group or Median other Pacific(N=9) 25.Islander. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1. Median (N=9) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your White. institution 32. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Two or more Group races. Median (N=9) 46. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 6. Median (N=9) 4. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Race/ethnicity institution 3. unknown. GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Nonresident Group alien. Median (N=9) 4. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=9) 1. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Women. institution 53. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=9) 61. Race/ethnicityShape or gender line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=9) 90 80 70 61 60 53 50 46 Percent 40 32 27 30 26 25 20 12 6 10 3 4 3 4 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 American Indian or Asian Black or African Hispanic/ Native Hawaiian or White Two or Race/ethnicity Nonresident alien Women Alaska Native American Latino other Pacific Islander more races unknown Race/ethnicity or gender Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=9) NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See 'Use of Median Values for Comparison Group' for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2020, Fall Enrollment component. Figure 2. Unduplicated 12-month headcount (2018-19), total FTE Figure 3. Percent of students enrolled in distance education enrollment (2018-19), and full- and part-time fall courses, by amount of distance education: Fall 2019 enrollment (Fall 2019) Image description. Image description. HorizontalEnrollment Bar measure chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalDistance education Bar chart participation with 3 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of students. YX scale titled ScalePercent label. of students. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Unduplicated institution 28248.headcount - total. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Students institution exclusively 46. in distance education. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Total FTE enrollment.Group Median (N=9) 19804. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Students in Group at least Median one but (N=9) not all20. distance education courses. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 10103. Median (N=9) 9626. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 18. Median (N=9) 19. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Full-time institution fall enrollment. 4953. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Students institution not in36. any distance education. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Part-time fall Group enrollment. Median (N=9) 4179. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=9) 54. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 11766. MedianEnrollment (N=9) 9555. measure line, Shape Label: Distance education participation Shape InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=9) InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution End of image description. ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=9) 28,248 Unduplicated 46 Students exclusively headcount - total 19,804 in distance education 20 Total FTE 10,103 enrollment 9,626 18 Students in at least one but not all distance.. 19 Full-time 4,953 fall enrollment 4,179 36 Students not in any Part-time 11,766 distance education 54 fall enrollment 9,555 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Number of students Percent of students Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=9) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=9) NOTE: For details on calculating full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, see Calculating NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. FTE in the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2020, Fall Enrollment Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2019, 12-month component. Enrollment component and Spring 2020, Fall Enrollment component. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 3 Central Texas College Figure 4. Number of subbaccalaureate degrees and certificates Figure 5. Tuition and required fees for full-time, first-time awarded, by level: 2018-19 degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates: Academic years 2016-17 to 2019-20 Image description. Image description. HorizontalAward level Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalAcademic yearBar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of awards. YX scale titled ScaleTuition label. and fees. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Associate's. institution 3306. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your 2019-20. institution $2700. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Certificates Group of at least Median 2 but (N=9) less 1401.than 4 years. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison 2018-19. Group Median (N=9) $2928. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=9) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $2700. Median (N=9) $2832. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Certificates institution of 381.
Recommended publications
  • IPEDS Data Feedback Report 2017
    Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 7,000 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. IPEDS collects institution-level data on student enrollment, graduation rates, student charges, program completions, faculty, staff, and finances. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aid in the college search process. For more information about IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? As suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel, the figures in this report provide selected indicators for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2016-17 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. This report provides a list of pre-selected comparison group institutions and the criteria used for their selection. Additional information about these indicators and the pre- selected comparison group are provided in the Methodological Notes at the end of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Achievement Summary 2017-2018
    Student Achievement Summary 2017-2018 Laredo College is an institution committed to student success by providing comprehensive educational services that focus on the dynamic requirements and needs of its local, regional, and international community. The College assesses student achievement using a set of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) that are published annually in the institution’s Student Success Report Card. Results are compared to the College’s Peer Group as defined by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, as shown in the Rank column. The status of each KPI is indicated by a color: = Target Met = Opportunity for Improvement = Attention Needed PEER KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RESULT* STATUS GROUP RANK SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS SPRING SPRING SPRING 2016 2017 2018 The percentage of students who maintained a ‘C’ average after their first year at LCC. NA 81.70% 80.10% 77% FALL FALL FALL SUCCESS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics 2nd The percent of underprepared students attempting developmental education who 42.40% 47.90% 54.40% satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. Reading 7th The percent of underprepared students attempting developmental education who 58.40% 48.10% 55.10% satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. Writing 8th The percent of underprepared students attempting developmental education who 50.70% 47.40% 48.40% satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. SUCCESS IN GATEWAY COURSES FALL FALL FALL 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics 3rd The percent of prepared and underprepared students who successfully 42.97% 43.78% 46.54% complete a college-level course in math, reading and writing. Reading 7th The percent of prepared and underprepared students who successfully 55.13% 58.11% 56.47% complete a college-level course in math, reading and writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Book 2005.2.Pmd
    T C Temple College FACT BOOK 2005 established 1928 1 Note on sources The Temple College 2005 Fact Book provides general statistical information about the college’s mission, programs, and services. It is important for the reader to be aware that data presented in this publication may differ slightly from statistics found in other system reports. Such variances may result from differences in the source of information used, the reporting period covered (semester, annual academic year), or the student base. For these reasons, the source of the information for each table and graph is cited at the bottom of the page. Trends are tracked using consistent sources for identical time periods and students. Explanation of abbreviations used in source identification: CBM 001 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) student report - reported each semester CBM 004 THECB class report - reported each semester CBM 008 THECB faculty report - reported each semester CBM 009 THECB Graduate Report - reported annually CBM 00C THECB continuing education class report IPEDS - NCES Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System - National Center for Educational Statistics - reported annually THECB/TWC ASALFS Automated Student and Adult Learner Follow-up System, project of The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board in partnership with the Texas Workforce Commission 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................................. 4 Administration .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Online Institutional Resume
    Online Resume for Prospective Students, Parents and the Public CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE Location: Killeen, Central Region Large Accountability Peer Group: Amarillo College, Blinn College District, Del Mar College, Laredo College, Navarro College, North Central Texas College, South Plains College, Tyler Junior College Degrees Offered: Associate's, Certificate 1, Certificate 2, Enhanced Skills Certificate Institutional Resumes Accountability System Definitions Institution Home Page Enrollment Costs Institution Peer Group Avg. Average Annual Total Academic Costs for Resident Race/Ethnicity Fall 2019 % Total Fall 2019 % Total Undergraduate Student Taking 30 SCH, FY 2020 White 3,062 32.3% 4,578 41.4% Peer Group Hispanic 2,711 28.6% 4,583 41.5% Type of Cost Institution Average African American 2,712 28.6% 1,207 10.9% Asian/Pacific Isl. 412 4.3% 253 2.3% In-district Total Academic Cost $2,700 $3,226 International 58 .6% 67 .6% Out-of-district Total Academic Cost $3,390 $4,891 Other & Unknown 537 5.7% 366 3.3% Off-campus Room & Board $5,485 $7,303 Total 9,492 100.0% 11,055 100.0% Cost of Books & Supplies $1,900 $1,588 Cost of Off-campus Transportation $3,394 $5,371 Financial Aid and Personal Expenses Total In-district Cost $13,479 $17,488 Institution Peer Group FY 2018 Percent Ave Amt Percent Avg Amt Total Out-of-district Cost $14,169 $19,153 Federal (Pell) Grants 26% $3,400 34% $4,032 Federal Student Loans 5% $1,989 18% $4,819 Federal, State, Institutional or Other 28% $3,629 42% $4,065 Grants Known by Institutions Degrees & Certificates Awarded
    [Show full text]
  • Core Residency Form
    CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE Core Residency Questions Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board rule 21.25 requires each student applying to enroll at an Institution to respond to a set of core residency questions for the purpose of determining the student’s eligibility for classification as a resident. PART A. Student Basic Information. All Students must complete this section. Name: ___________________________________ Student ID No. _______________________ Date of Birth: _____________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________________________ City:___________________________ State: ____________ Zip Code: ____________________ How long have you been living at this address? Years ____ Months ____ Please be sure to provide a cell phone number if you have one. You may update your phone numbers in your WebAdvisor student account as needed. Cell Phone: __________________________ Residence Phone: __________________________ Primary E-mail Address __________________________________________________________ Secondary E-mail Address ________________________________________________________ Emergency Contact Name: ________________________________________________________ Cell Phone: _______________________________ Other: ________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ PART B. Previous Enrollment. For All students. 1. During the 12 months prior to the term for which you are applying, did you attend a public college or university in Texas in a fall or
    [Show full text]
  • Success/Retention Activities
    Success/Retention Activities Participation Summary Data for All Institutions as of January 2, 2008 Number of Participating Institutions: 87 out of 120 (or 72.5%) Total Funding for Participating Institutions for Academic Year 2006: $21,437,067 Total Funding for Participating Institutions for Academic Year 2007: $27,000,636 Combined Funding for Participating Institutions for Academic Years 2006-2007: $48,437,703 Highest Funded Program in Academic Year 2006: $2,000,000 at University of Houston-Downtown University of Houston-Downtown Highest Funded Program in Academic Year 2007: $1,750,000 at Sam Houston State University Number of Students Served by Participating Institutions for Academic Year 2006: 311,621 Number of Students Served by Participating Institutions for Academic Year 2007: 412,887 Combined Number of Students Served by Participating Institutions for Academic Years 2006-2007: 724,508 Participating Students Funding Institutions Served Academic Support 93 249,907 $16,993,054 Services Access to Faculty and 11 12,405 $1,261,653 Academic Advising Early-Alert Systems 15 43,245 $1,319,576 Extended Student 16 22,395 $1,875,975 Orientation Institution-Wide Diversity 7 25,702 $142,000 Programs/Activities Learner-Centered 12 41,374 $1,360,950 Teaching Qualitative and effective advisement and 20 72,588 $5,664,838 counseling system Student Success Courses 35 59,734 $6,491,587 or Bridge Programs Participating Institutions: Academic support services Alvin Community College Amarillo College Angelina College Angelo State University Brazosport College Cedar Valley College Clarendon College Del Mar College El Paso Community College District Frank Phillips College Hill College Howard College Howard College Lamar State College-Orange Lamar State College-Port Arthur Laredo Community College Midland College Midwestern State University Montgomery College North Lake College Odessa College Paris Junior College Ranger College Sam Houston State University San Antonio College St.
    [Show full text]
  • Volleyball Media Guide 2021 Schedule
    LEE♦- COLLEGE .......... ' REBELS & ..,........ REBELSa 2021 ROSTER 1 2 3 4 ASHLYNN LEWIS MARIAH ELLIS JULIANA DAVIS ALISHYA ROMAN FR • 6-1 • MB FR • 6-1 • MB FR • 5-5 •DS/L FR • 5-5 • OH Texas City, TX Russelville, AR Houston, TX Kailua, HI 5 6 7 8 9 GRACIE LEWIS SAMIYA HARRIS DEANNA SPELL SINA TOROSLU CIERRA GILBERT FR • 5-3 • DS/L SO • 5-8 • OH FR • 5-7 • DS/U SO • 6-0 • MB FR • 6-1 • MB League City, TX Detroit, MI Houston, TXs Stuttgart, Germany College Station, TX 10 11 12 13 LEA VENGHAUS IMARI WILSON TRINIDIE DAVIS JANNIE BLAKE FR • 5-7 • S FR • 5-11 • OH/OPP FR • 5-9 • OPP/S FR • 5-6 • S Senden, Germany Humble, TX San Antonio, TX Lā’ie, O’ahu HEAD COACH ASSISTANT COACH ATHLETIC TRAINER DANIELLE ABOLANLE CAITLIN ESSIX “BONDIE” BLACKMORE ONIPEDE 2 LADY REBELS 2021 SEASON LEE COLLEGE VOLLEYBALL MEDIA GUIDE 2021 SCHEDULE DAY DATE OPPONENT LOCATION TIME Saturday August 14 Dillard University Scrimmage New Orleans, LA 11:00 AM Saturday August 14 Pearl River Scrimmage New Orleans, LA 1:00 PM Tuesday August 17 Texas Southern Scrimmage Houston, TX 2:00 PM Friday August 20 Dallas College – Northlake Baytown, TX 1:00 PM Friday August 20 Fort Scott Community College Baytown, TX 5:00 PM Saturday August 21 Dallas College – Cedar Valley Baytown, TX 11:00 AM Saturday August 21 Dallas College – Mountain View Baytown, TX 1:00 PM Saturday August 21 Dallas College – Eastfeld Baytown, TX 5:00 PM Wednesday August 25 Dallas College – Mountain View Dallas, TX 6:00 PM Friday August 27 Pima Community College Arizona Western 9:00 AM (PT) Friday August 27 Glendale
    [Show full text]
  • FICE Code List for Colleges and Universities (X0011)
    FICE Code List For Colleges And Universities ALABAMA ALASKA 001002 ALABAMA A & M 001061 ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY 001005 ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY 066659 PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND C.C. 001008 ATHENS STATE UNIVERSITY 011462 U OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE 008310 AUBURN U-MONTGOMERY 001063 U OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS 001009 AUBURN UNIVERSITY MAIN 001065 UNIV OF ALASKA SOUTHEAST 005733 BEVILL STATE C.C. 001012 BIRMINGHAM SOUTHERN COLL ARIZONA 001030 BISHOP STATE COMM COLLEGE 001081 ARIZONA STATE UNIV MAIN 001013 CALHOUN COMMUNITY COLLEGE 066935 ARIZONA STATE UNIV WEST 001007 CENTRAL ALABAMA COMM COLL 001071 ARIZONA WESTERN COLLEGE 002602 CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY 001072 COCHISE COLLEGE 012182 CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY 031004 COCONINO COUNTY COMM COLL 012308 COMM COLLEGE OF THE A.F. 008322 DEVRY UNIVERSITY 001015 ENTERPRISE STATE JR COLL 008246 DINE COLLEGE 001003 FAULKNER UNIVERSITY 008303 GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 005699 G.WALLACE ST CC-SELMA 001076 GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLL 001017 GADSDEN STATE COMM COLL 001074 GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY 001019 HUNTINGDON COLLEGE 001077 MESA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 001020 JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIV 011864 MOHAVE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 001021 JEFFERSON DAVIS COMM COLL 001082 NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIV 001022 JEFFERSON STATE COMM COLL 011862 NORTHLAND PIONEER COLLEGE 001023 JUDSON COLLEGE 026236 PARADISE VALLEY COMM COLL 001059 LAWSON STATE COMM COLLEGE 001078 PHOENIX COLLEGE 001026 MARION MILITARY INSTITUTE 007266 PIMA COUNTY COMMUNITY COL 001028 MILES COLLEGE 020653 PRESCOTT COLLEGE 001031 NORTHEAST ALABAMA COMM CO 021775 RIO SALADO COMMUNITY COLL 005697 NORTHWEST
    [Show full text]
  • Blinn College 2012-13 Budget
    Blinn College 2012-13 Budget BOARD OF TRUSTEES Atwood C. Kenjura, President Leon B. Toubin, Vice President Douglas R. Borchardt, Secretary Henry J. Boehm, Jr., M.D. Norwood Lange Carolyn D. Miller, CPA David Sommer ADMINISTRATION Harold Nolte, Ed.D., President Ted Raspiller, Ed.D., President Brazos County Campuses Cathy Boeker, M.B.A., Executive Admin. of External Affairs Jeff Cermin, M.B.A., Interim VP Administrative Services Debra R. LaCour, Ph.D., VP Academic Affairs Dennis K. Crowson, Ph.D, VP Student Services Robert Brick, Ph.D., VP Applied Sciences & Workforce Education Brenham Campus Bryan Campus 902 College Avenue 2423 Blinn Boulevard Brenham, Texas 77833 Bryan, Texas 77805 (979)830-4000 (979)209-7200 Schulenburg Campus Sealy Campus 100 Ranger Drive 3701 Outlet Center Drive Schulenburg, Texas 78956 Sealy, Texas 77474 (979)743-5200 (979)627-7997 BUDGET OF BLINN COLLEGE SCHOOL YEAR 2012-13 Budget Based on Estimated Fall Enrollment: 18,156 Brenham 2,810 Bryan 12,342 Schulenburg 248 Sealy 186 Other 2,570 Room and Board Students - Fall Semester 1,264 Adjusted Property Taxable Value of Washington County $2,264,399,954 Tax Rate per $100 property valuation for maintenance taxes $0.0567 Building Square Footage: Instructional Admin. Dorms Apts Other TOTAL Brenham 238,573 66,275 209,985 106,211 137,187 758,231 Bryan 239,411 27,503 68,891 335,805 Schulenburg 34,569 1,741 2,353 38,663 Sealy 4,264 483 5,759 10,506 Museum 25,000 25,000 Tech Center 10,600 700 1,100 12,400 HSC 42,347 11,188 53,535 TOTAL 569,764 107,890 209,985 106,211 240,290 1,234,140
    [Show full text]
  • Wharton County Junior College
    Wharton County Junior College PIONEER BASEBALL 2017 SCHEDULE DATE DAY OPPONENT LOCATION TIME GAME January 31 Tuesday Coastal Bend College Wharton 2:00 7/7 February 4 Saturday Baton Rouge Community College Baton Rouge, LA 12:00 9 4 Saturday Weatherford College Baton Rouge, LA 3:00 9 TOURNAMENT OF CHAMPIONS 10 Friday Howard College Beaumont 6:00 9 Lamar University 11 Saturday New Mexico Junior College Sugar Land 9:00 9 Constellation Field 11 Saturday Grayson College Huntsville 7:00 9 Sam Houston State University 12 Sunday Weatherford College Houston 4:00 9 San Jacinto College 14 Tuesday Coastal Bend College Beeville 2:00 9 18 Saturday Angelina College Wharton 1:00 7/7 23 Thursday Blinn College Wharton 6:00 9 25 Saturday Blinn College Brenham 3:00 7/9 27 Monday McLennan College Waco 2:00 9 March 2 Thursday San Jacinto College Houston 6:00 9 4 Saturday San Jacinto College Wharton 2:00 7/9 7 Tuesday St. Edward’s University Austin 1:30 9 10 Friday Laredo College Laredo 5:00 9 11 Saturday Laredo College Laredo 12:00 7/9 13 Monday Angelina College Lufkin 5:00 9 16 Thursday Alvin College Alvin 1:00 9 18 Saturday Alvin College Wharton 2:00 7/9 20 Monday St. Edward’s University Wharton 5:00 9 23 Thursday Galveston College Wharton 6:00 9 25 Saturday Galveston College Galveston 3:00 7/9 27 Monday Baton Rouge Community College Wharton 3:00 9 30 Thursday Blinn College Brenham 4:00 7/9 April 1 Saturday Blinn College Wharton 2:00 7/9 3 Monday McLennan College Wharton 3:00 9 6 Thursday San Jacinto College Wharton 3:00 7/9 8 Saturday San Jacinto College
    [Show full text]
  • Four Finalists Named for President's Position
    NOVEMBER 2015 Four finalists named for president’s position After reviewing a large pool of qualified candidates, the presidential search committee has named four finalists for the president’s job at Kilgore College. The search committee is comprised of Board Dr. Brenda Kays Dr. Lynn Moore Dr. Mark Smith Dr. Kyle Wagner Secretary Karol Current position: Current position: Current position: Current position: VP of Pruett; Board VP President, Stanly President, Southeast Vice President of Instruction & Economic James Walker; trustee Community College, Kentucky Community & Educational Services at Development, Coastal Joe Carrington and North Carolina Technical College Temple College Bend College, Texas college employees D’Wayne Shaw and Education: Education: Education: Education: Ed.D. from University of Ph.D. from The Univ. of Ph.D. from Capella Ph.D. from Capella Brandon Walker. North Texas in Denton Texas at Austin There will be two University University open forums on each Interview & Interview & Interview & Interview & interview day where Public Forum Date: Public Forum Date: Public Forum Date: Public Forum Date: the public will have Thursday, Nov. 12 Monday, Nov. 16 Tuesday, Nov. 10 Thursday, Nov. 5 an opportunity to ask 1:15-2pm, 2:15-3pm 1:15-2pm, 2:15-3pm 1:15-2pm, 2:15-3pm 1:15-2pm, 2:15-3pm questions. Administration Bldg. Administration Bldg. Administration Bldg. Administration Bldg. Rangers will play for SWJCFC Spradlin dies at age 85 Championship Saturday in Corsicana Kilgore College’s longest- serving board member, R.E. The Kilgore College football “Sonny” Spradlin Jr., passed away team picked off five Trinity Saturday, Oct. 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Xtreme Academic Makeover, Addresses College Readiness, a Topic with Tremendous Potential to Improve Student Learning in a Meaningful Way
    North Central Texas College QEP 0 North Central Texas College QEP Table of Contents Chapter 1: Executive Summary . .6 Chapter 2: Process Used to Develop the QEP . 8 Discovery Phase Development Phase Chapter 3: Identification of theTopic–College Readiness . .16 History and Demographics Literature and Data Analysis Chapter 4: Desired Student Learning Outcomes . 22 Objective A –Performance in Core Courses Objective B–Academic Support Services Objective C––Academic Advising Chapter 5: Literature Review and Best Practices . .. .37 Best Practices David T. Conley Model Chapter 6: Actions to be Implemented . .. 43 Embedding Key Academic Behaviors in Core Courses Required Structured Academic Support Services Instructional Resources Professional Development College-wide Change College-wide Awareness Activities Implementation Logistics Chapter 7: Timeline . 52 Pilot Implementation Implementation Activities and Timeline Course Design, Review and Revision Start-Up Activities Xtreme Professional Development Structured Academic Support Services Assessment Activities 1 North Central Texas College QEP Chapter 8: Organizational Structure . .58 Organizational Chart Roles and Responsibilities Chapter 9: Resources . .63 Budget Overview Budget Justification Chapter 10: Assessment . 69 Model QEP Design Project Xtreme Assessment Model Student Input Variables Environmental Variables Outcomes/Impacts Assessment Process Student Learning and Environmental Outcomes Assessment Methods and Criteria Works Cited . 83 Appendices . .. .86 2 North Central Texas College QEP Appendices Summary of Contents Appendix A Fall 2008 QEP Topic Selection Survey . 86 Appendix B Weekly QEP Topic Emails . 87 Appendix C QEP Potential Topics Summary Document . 89 Appendix D QEP Topic Evaluation Rubric . .95 Appendix E Possible QEP Topic Survey for Employees . .96 Appendix F QEP Concept Paper Template . .97 Appendix G Student Input on QEP Topic .
    [Show full text]