Federation of Australian Radio Broadcasters Limited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federation of Australian Radio Broadcasters Limited FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIAN RADIO BROADCASTERS LIMITED ACN 059 731 467 SUBMISSION TO THE REVIEW OF BROADCASTING REGULATION BY THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Executive Summary 2 3. The Australian Radio Industry 3 3.1 Key Submissions 3 3.2 Diversified & Competitive 3 4. Responding to the Listeners 10 4.1 Key Submissions 10 4.2 Tracking Listeners’ Demands 10 4.3 Responding to Listeners’ Concerns 10 5. New Challenges for Free-to-Air Radio 12 5.1 Key Submissions 12 5.2 Radio’s Key Market Segments under Threat 13 5.3 New Technology 13 6. Digital Radio Broadcasting 16 6.1 Key Submissions 16 6.2 Background 16 6.3 Transition to Digital 16 6.4 Conclusion 17 7. Particular Issues 18 7.1 The Changing Nature of Broadcasting 18 7.2 The Public Interest and the Objectives of Broadcasting Policy 18 7.3 The Economics of Broadcasting 19 FARB Submission to Productivity Commission – 19 May 99 1. INTRODUCTION The Federation of Australian Radio Broadcasters Limited (FARB) was established in 1930 with 33 members. Today it has 215. FARB is an industry association representing the interests of Australia’s free-enterprise commercial radio broadcasters, several of them having been in operation since 1925. Its policy is determined by the industry membership each year at its Annual General Meeting and within this general policy framework, further policy decisions are made by a Board of Directors. The Federation makes this submission to the Productivity Commission to provide an overview of the radio industry in Australia in general and commercial radio industry in particular, but several issues on which there are no industry consensus will be addressed by individual Members. FARB argues that the industry is competitive, efficient and takes an active and research driven position in responding to the interests of its listeners. FARB argues that the position of free-to-air commercial radio services is likely to be eroded by new media (including subscription and free-to-air television and Internet services) capable of utilising digital technologies to provide radio-like services. FARB submits there is a need to introduce a timely legislative framework for the introduction of digital radio to ensure commercial radio is able to compete on equal terms in the digital era. The Federation acknowledges the assistance provided by Digital Business Consulting Pty Limited in preparation of this submission. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The two main points FARB wishes to bring to the attention of the Productivity Commission are: Commercial radio competes in a very crowded marketplace for a share of the listening audience and for a share of advertising revenues by providing a free-to-air service responsive to the needs of the Australian audience. The commercial radio industry sees the transition to digital radio broadcasting as the natural evolution from the current analog broadcasting and as a means to compete with other sectors utilising digital service delivery technologies. To ensure radio is able to move efficiently and deliberately to the new digital radio technology, there is a need for a technology neutral legislative framework for the introduction of digital radio. 2 FARB Submission to Productivity Commission – 19 May 99 3. THE AUSTRALIAN RADIO INDUSTRY 3.1. Key Submissions • The ABA should continue to ensure diversity of radio services by upholding the differences in the categories of service as specified in the Broadcasting Services Act (BSA) • Commercial radio, as the category of radio service most listened to, is providing diversity of programming, at various levels of cost • Competition for the radio audience is strong within the industry and from other media providing radio-like services, including on-line services • Competition for advertising revenues is also very strong, with radio likely to be affected by the advent of new services • Commercial radio revenues have not increased proportionately with the introduction of new services in regional areas causing many stations to incur losses • The ownership of commercial radio services within duopolies and networks enables cost efficiencies to be gained and services to be improved. 3.2. Diversified & Competitive 3.2.1. Diversity between Categories of Broadcasting Services The Broadcasting Services Act (“BSA”) defines six categories of broadcasting services: (a) National broadcasting services (b) Commercial broadcasting services (c) Community broadcasting services (d) Subscription broadcasting services (e) Subscription narrowcasting services (f) Open narrowcasting services The Australian radio industry provides services in each of these categories of service. Only commercial radio and community radio services require individual licences, all other radio services (other than the national radio services) are provided under the relevant class licence. The national radio services are those services provided in accordance with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act 1983 (up to five services in each market) and the Special Broadcasting Act 1991 (one or 3 FARB Submission to Productivity Commission – 19 May 99 two services in each metropolitan market). Commercial radio broadcasts services1: (a) that provide programs that, when considered in the context of the service being provided, appear to be intended to appeal to the general public; and (b) that provide programs that: (i) are able to be received by commonly available equipment; and (ii) are made available free to the general public; and (c) that are usually funded by advertising revenue; and (d) that are operated for profit or as part of a profit-making enterprise Community radio broadcasts services2: (a) that are provided for community purposes; and (b) are not operated for profit or as part of a profit-making enterprise; and (c) that provide programs that: (i) are able to be received by commonly available equipment; and (ii) are made available free to the general public Australian Radio Stations 1998 700 600 500 400 300 AM Number 200 FM 100 0 l l t a ia ity s on rc n ca ti e u w a m m o N m rr om o a C C N NOTE: National figure refers to number of transmitters, ABC Annual Report 97/98. In 1992 a new broadcasting category was introduced in Australia that was to be complementary to the services already provided as national, commercial and community radio services. This category of service is called Open Narrowcasting. Open narrowcasting radio provides broadcasting services3: (a) whose reception is limited: 1 Broadcasting Services Act 1992 Section 14 Part 2 section 14 2 Ibid section 15 3 Ibid section 18 4 FARB Submission to Productivity Commission – 19 May 99 (i) by being targeted to special interest groups; or (ii) by being intended only for limited locations, for example, arenas or business premises; or (iii) by being provided during a limited period or to cover a special event; (iv) because they provide programs of limited appeal; or (v) for some other reason This legislative categorisation of services found in the BSA provides the Australian consumer with a diversity of choice of radio programs delivered free of charge to a standard radio receiver. 3.2.2. Program Diversity with a Range of Cost Levels Within the commercial radio category there is a diversity of program formats with different cost levels and revenue expectations. Commercial radio provides a variety of program formats with combinations of personalities, music, news, sport, promotion and audience interaction. Each station has a different emphasis on each of these components. The right formula today may need some subtle changes tomorrow. In the competitive commercial radio industry success rarely comes cheaply. The following table sets out the numbers and average operating expenditure and revenue levels for the 215 commercial radio services in Australia at June 19984. Commercial Radio Market AM/FM Number Average Annual Average Annual Operating Cost Revenue $ ‘000 $’000 Capital Cities AM 18 7,511 7,722 FM 21 9,524 12,752 Larger Regional AM 18 1,328 1,561 (100,000+ pop) FM 26 2,146 2,535 Medium Regional AM 37 1,238 1,386 (40,000-100,00 pop) FM 33 367 415 Smaller Regional AM 33 582 642 (<40,000 pop) FM 29 310 303 In the highly competitive capital city markets, salaries and wages represent 35% of total operating costs for FM services and 45% for AM services. Expenses that are variable with revenue represent 31% of total costs for FM services and 16% for AM services. In regional markets, salary and wages represent 40% of total operating costs while revenue related costs represent 14%. 4 Broadcasting Financial Results 1997-98, Australian Broadcasting Authority March 1999 5 FARB Submission to Productivity Commission – 19 May 99 Revenue earning capablity, the program format being provided and the nature of the market being served are the determinants of the level of costs. With dual station ownership of radio services in the same market, sharing of overhead costs (administration, occupancy) has enabled some economies to be achieved. 3.2.3. Competition for the Radio Audience With the increased number of leisure activities available, the competition is intense for the time audiences allocate to radio. Commercial radio competes for the radio audience with national radio (up to seven services in each market), community radio and various narrowcasting services. Of all the radio broadcasting sectors, commercial radio has the largest audience share of listening with 75%, followed by the national (21%) and community (4%) sectors. The strongest competition for audience is from within the commercial radio sector of the radio industry. One of the greatest advantages for radio over other media is its mobility, with audiences free to listen to radio programs in cars, outdoors, at work and around the home. All radio services capitalise on this feature, but none more so than commercial radio. The BSA allows the common ownership of two commercial radio services in the one market.
Recommended publications
  • Apo-Nid63005.Pdf
    AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING TRIBUNAL ANNUAL REPORT 1991-92 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal Sydney 1992 ©Commonwealth of Australia ISSN 0728-8883 Design by Media and Public Relations Branch, Australian Broadcasting Tribunal. Printed in Australia by Pirie Printers Sales Pty Ltd, Fyshwick, A.CT. 11 Contents 1. MEMBERSIDP OF THE TRIBUNAL 1 2. THE YEAR IN REVIEW 7 3. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF THE TRIBUNAL 13 Responsible Minister 16 4. LICENSING 17 Number and Type of Licences on Issue 19 Grant of Limited Licences 20 Commercial Radio Licence Grant Inquiries 21 Supplementary Radio Grant Inquiries 23 Joined Supplementary /Independent Radio Grant Inquiries 24 Remote Licences 26 Public Radio Licence Grants 26 Renewal of Licences with Conditions or Licensee Undertaking 30 Revocation/Suspension/Conditions Inquiries 32 Allocation of Call Signs 37 5. OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL 39 Applications and Notices Received 41 Most Significant Inquiries 41 Unfinished Inquiries 47 Contraventions Amounting To Offences 49 Licence Transfers 49 Uncompleted Inquiries 50 Operation of Service by Other than Licensee 50 Registered Lender and Loan Interest Inquiries 50 6. PROGRAM AND ADVERTISING STANDARDS 51 Program and Advertising Standards 53 Australian Content 54 Compliance with Australian Content Television Standard 55 Children's Television Standards 55 Compliance with Children's Standards 58 Comments and Complaints 59 Broadcasting of Political Matter 60 Research 61 iii 7. PROGRAMS - PUBLIC INQUIRIES 63 Public Inquiries 65 Classification of Television Programs 65 Foreign Content In Television Advertisements 67 Advertising Time On Television 68 Film And Television Co-productions 70 Australian Documentary Programs 71 Cigarette Advertising During The 1990 Grand Prix 72 Test Market Provisions For Foreign Television Advertisements 72 Public Radio Sponsorship Announcements 73 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 74 John Laws - Comments About Aborigines 75 Anti-Discrimination Standards 75 Accuracy & Fairness in Current Affairs 76 Religious Broadcasts 77 Review of Classification Children's Television Programs 78 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist for Returning to Community Radio Stations
    RETURNING TO COMMUNITY RADIO STATIONS - CHECKLIST As the various states and territories progressively lift social distancing requirements, community radio station boards and management committees should consider their roadmap for safe return. Every station will be different – with each returning in the way that is best suited for their situation. Public health remains the most important consideration. Following advice from Federal Government health authorities and any state/territory regulation is critical. Organisational Consideration Action Y/N Access to information 1. Do you and your organisation have all relevant facts about COVID-19? 2. Is your organisation staying up to date? 3. Check official information sources including: • Australian Government Department of Health: www.health.gov.au/news/health-alerts/novel- coronavirus-2019-ncov-health-alert • World Health Organisation: www.who.int • Safe Work Australia ww.safeworkaustralia.org.au 4. Relevant State/Territory/local government websites. Governance 5. Is station board and staff clear on who within your organisation will make and implement decisions on returning to the studio/office? 6. Does everyone within your organisation understand their role? 7. Has your organisation nominated a COVID-19 Safety Coordinator to oversee delivery of your return plan? You can locate a description of this role on CBAAs website. Strategy 8. Has your organisation reviewed its strategic plan for COVID-19 considerations? 9. Has your organisation defined what success looks like? 10. Does your organisation need to amend fixtures, broadcasting and training rules or activities to ensure physical distancing? Financial 11. Does your organisation know what its new safety/return to studio measures will cost? 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Media – Pubic Broadcasting System (PBS)
    SUPPORTING PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY MEDIA ACTION NEEDED We urge Congress to: Restore public broadcasting funding to the FY 2013 appropriation level of $445 million through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). Pass the Community Access Preservation Act (CAP Act) to preserve public, educational, and governmental (PEG) non-commercial cable channels for local communities. OVERVIEW—PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY MEDIA Public media consists of the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), National Public Radio (NPR), and more than 1,000 local public broadcasting stations. Community media is comprised of public, educational, and government (PEG) cable access TV and community radio stations. Both public and community media have a long history of presenting local, regional, and national nonprofit arts programming, a great majority of which is not available on commercial channels. These organizations play a unique role in bringing both classics and contemporary works to the American public. All of these systems exist because of federal funding or legislation. TALKING POINTS— CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING In creating America’s unique public broadcasting system, Congress acknowledged public broadcasting’s role in transmitting arts and culture: “It is in the public interest to encourage the growth and development of public radio and television broadcasting, including the use of such media for instructional, educational, and cultural purposes.” And Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) is the vehicle through which Congress has chosen to promote noncommercial public telecommunications. CPB does not produce or broadcast programs. The vast majority of funding through CPB goes directly to local public broadcast stations in the form of Community Service Grants. The federal portion of the average public station’s revenue is approximately 10–15 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN PODCAST RANKER TOP 100 PODCASTS Reporting Period: 25 November - 22 December
    AUSTRALIAN PODCAST RANKER TOP 100 PODCASTS Reporting Period: 25 November - 22 December RANK PODCAST PUBLISHER SALES REPRESENTATION RANK CHANGE 1 Hamish & Andy SCA-PodcastOne Australia PodcastOne Australia 0 2 The Lighthouse News Corp Australia News Corp / Nova Ent h5 3 Kate, Tim & Marty Nova Nova Entertainment 0 4 7am Schwartz Media Schwartz Media New 5 The Kyle & Jackie O Show Australian Radio Network Australian Radio Network i3 6 Life and Crimes with Andrew Rule News Corp Australia News Corp / Nova Ent h2 7 SEN Breakfast SEN / Crocmedia SEN / Crocmedia i2 8 Whateley SEN / Crocmedia SEN / Crocmedia i4 9 Sky News - News Bulletin News Corp Australia News Corp / Nova Ent h5 10 WILOSOPHY with Wil Anderson TOFOP Productions Whooshkaa New 11 Money News with Ross Greenwood Nine Radio1 Nine Radio i5 12 The Alan Jones Breakfast Show Nine Radio Nine Radio i2 13 Bedtime Explorers The Parent Brand The Parent Brand New 14 Kennedy Molloy SCA-Triple M SCA i5 15 The Howie Games SCA-PodcastOne Australia PodcastOne Australia i4 16 Hughesy and Kate SCA-Hit SCA i1 17 Moonman In The Morning - 104.9 SCA-Triple M SCA i5 Triple M Sydney 18 The Hot Breakfast SCA-Triple M SCA h1 19 Who the Hell is Hamish? News Corp Australia News Corp / Nova Ent i6 20 Chrissie, Sam & Browny Nova Nova Entertainment i4 21 Jase & PJ Australian Radio Network Australian Radio Network i1 22 Tech News News Corp Australia News Corp / Nova Ent h3 23 Police Tape News Corp Australia News Corp / Nova Ent h24 24 The Ray Hadley Morning Show Nine Radio Nine Radio i3 25 Motley Fool Money Australia
    [Show full text]
  • The Decision by the the Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA) To
    News The decision by the The Australian wasn't surprised that the materials The Launch in Sydney this month of Broadcasting Authority (ABA) to had been relocated offshore and the new Commander® Vision phone impose licence conditions on Sydney acknowledged that they were aware system by PlesTel is a further mani­ Radio Station 2UE was welcomed by that relocation to an offshore host festation of the shift towards globali­ the CLC, who had played an active was an option for offending sites. sation in the telecommunications role during the 19-day inquiry in Several sites with sexually explicit industry. The Commander is a hybrid October to December last year. materials moved offshore prior to telephone system designed and January 1 in anticipation of the new manufactured by Irish technology CLC’s Julie Eisenburg said that the law, he said. company, Lake Communications and conditions imposed involved clear marketed in Australia by PlesTel - an and frequent disclosure of relevant Nugent expects the number of com­ alliance of the South African company, commercial interests, backed up by plaints to increase with the implemen­ Plessey (70%) and Telstra (30%). The a compliance program. In addition, tation of a hard copy and online ban­ market targeted by Plestel is small to the requirement that the Web site ner advertising campaign to inform medium-sized businesses in rural and and physical registers of interest the targeted areas of concern about outback Australia. to disclose the broad financial the ABA hotline. arrangements means listeners will Will the marketing power of the old get the full picture about which media companies succeed in captur­ Reporting the story of the first ABA commercial interests are behind ing the biggest slice of the local and take-down order, front-line American 2UE presenters and producers, international calls market? One.Tel - news service, WiredNews headlined she said.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Stations
    1 CHANGING STATIONS FULL INDEX 100 Top Tunes 190 2GZ Junior Country Service Club 128 1029 Hot Tomato 170, 432 2HD 30, 81, 120–1, 162, 178, 182, 190, 192, 106.9 Hill FM 92, 428 247, 258, 295, 352, 364, 370, 378, 423 2HD Radio Players 213 2AD 163, 259, 425, 568 2KM 251, 323, 426, 431 2AY 127, 205, 423 2KO 30, 81, 90, 120, 132, 176, 227, 255, 264, 2BE 9, 169, 423 266, 342, 366, 424 2BH 92, 146, 177, 201, 425 2KY 18, 37, 54, 133, 135, 140, 154, 168, 189, 2BL 6, 203, 323, 345, 385 198–9, 216, 221, 224, 232, 238, 247, 250–1, 2BS 6, 302–3, 364, 426 267, 274, 291, 295, 297–8, 302, 311, 316, 345, 2CA 25, 29, 60, 87, 89, 129, 146, 197, 245, 277, 354–7, 359–65, 370, 378, 385, 390, 399, 401– 295, 358, 370, 377, 424 2, 406, 412, 423 2CA Night Owls’ Club 2KY Swing Club 250 2CBA FM 197, 198 2LM 257, 423 2CC 74, 87, 98, 197, 205, 237, 403, 427 2LT 302, 427 2CH 16, 19, 21, 24, 29, 59, 110, 122, 124, 130, 2MBS-FM 75 136, 141, 144, 150, 156–7, 163, 168, 176–7, 2MG 268, 317, 403, 426 182, 184–7, 189, 192, 195–8, 200, 236, 238, 2MO 259, 318, 424 247, 253, 260, 263–4, 270, 274, 277, 286, 288, 2MW 121, 239, 426 319, 327, 358, 389, 411, 424 2NM 170, 426 2CHY 96 2NZ 68, 425 2Day-FM 84, 85, 89, 94, 113, 193, 240–1, 243– 2NZ Dramatic Club 217 4, 278, 281, 403, 412–13, 428, 433–6 2OO 74, 428 2DU 136, 179, 403, 425 2PK 403, 426 2FC 291–2, 355, 385 2QN 76–7, 256, 425 2GB 9–10, 14, 18, 29, 30–2, 49–50, 55–7, 59, 2RE 259, 427 61, 68–9, 84, 87, 95, 102–3, 107–8, 110–12, 2RG 142, 158, 262, 425 114–15, 120–2, 124–7, 129, 133, 136, 139–41, 2SM 54, 79, 84–5, 103, 119, 124,
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Radio
    FINALISTS FOR 2019 AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL RADIO AWARDS (ACRAs) Please note: Category Finalists are denoted with the following letters: Country>Provincial>Non-Metropolitan>Metropolitan>Syndication/Production Company BEST ON-AIR TEAM – METRO FM The Kyle & Jackie O Show; Kyle Sandilands & Jackie Henderson, KIIS 106.5, Sydney NSW, Australian Radio Network M Kate, Tim & Marty; Kate Ritchie, Tim Blackwell & Marty Sheargold Nova Network, NOVA Entertainment M Chrissie, Sam & Browny Chrissie Swan, Sam Pang, Jonathan Brown & Dean Thomas, Nova 100, Melbourne VIC, NOVA Entertainment M Jonesy & Amanda; Brendan Jones & Amanda Keller, WSFM, Sydney NSW, Australian Radio Network M Fifi, Fev & Byron; Fifi Box, Brendan Fevola & Byron Cooke, 101.9 The Fox, Melbourne VIC, Southern Cross Austereo M Kennedy Molloy; Jane Kennedy & Mick Molloy, Triple M Network, Southern Cross Austereo M BEST ON-AIR TEAM – METRO AM Afternoons with Erin Molan & Natalie Peters; Erin Molan & Natalie Peters, 2GB, Sydney NSW, Macquarie Media Limited M Breakfast with David Penberthy & Will Goodings; David Penberthy & Will Goodings, 5AA, Adelaide SA, NOVA Entertainment M Drive with Mark Allen & David Schwartz; Mark Allen & David Schwartz, Macquarie Sports Radio, Melbourne VIC, Macquarie Media Limited M Ray Hadley's Continuous Call Team; 2GB, Sydney NSW, Macquarie Media Limited M Laurel, Gary & Mark; Laurel Edwards, Gary Clare & Mark Hine, 4KQ, Brisbane QLD, Australian Radio Network M BEST ON-AIR TEAM COUNTRY AND PROVINCIAL Monkey in the Morning; Matt Monk, Lachi Rooke & Danielle Keilar,
    [Show full text]
  • Stability and Possible Change in the Japanese Broadcast Market: a Comparative Institutional Analysis
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Nishioka, Yoko Conference Paper Stability and Possible Change in the Japanese Broadcast Market: A Comparative Institutional Analysis 14th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society", Kyoto, Japan, 24th-27th June, 2017 Provided in Cooperation with: International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Suggested Citation: Nishioka, Yoko (2017) : Stability and Possible Change in the Japanese Broadcast Market: A Comparative Institutional Analysis, 14th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society", Kyoto, Japan, 24th-27th June, 2017, International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/168526 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Radio Journalism in India
    News by any other name: community radio journalism in India Bridget Backhaus* Griffith University, Australia Abstract Community radio journalism is a cultural resource that offers a voice to local communities and works to democratise media landscapes. Despite its indisputable value, community radio journalism in India faces a unique set of challenges: the foremost being that, officially, it does not exist. According to government policy, community radio stations are prohibited from broadcasting any news and current affairs content. The situation is further complicated by the presence of a development discourse underpinning the entire rationale for the sector. Instead of serving their listeners, community radio stations are beholden to a nebulous ‘development’ agenda. Under such circumstances, it is unsurprising that community radio journalism in India is relatively unexplored in the literature. This paper aims to address this gap by exploring how community radio practitioners in India source content and work around their restrictions in order to provide their listeners with relevant information and news. Keywords Community radio, India, news, journalism, development, social change Introduction Community radio is considered to be a voice for the voiceless and a stronghold of alternative views. Similarly, community radio journalism also has a tradition of democratising the media and acting as a cultural resource to provide communities with a local voice (Forde, Meadows & Foxwell-Norton, 2002). In India however, community radio journalism faces a unique set of challenges: the foremost of which being that, officially, it does not exist. Government policy prevents community radio stations in India from broadcasting any news or current affairs coverage. Employing the concept of community radio as rhizome as a theoretical framework, this article explores the fluid and contingent nature of community radio news and journalism in an environment where it officially does not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Television and Sound Broadcasting Regulations, 1996
    BROADFASTING AND RADIO Ri-DIFFIlSfON THE BROADCASTING AND RADIO RE-DIFFUSION ACT &GULATIONs (under section 23 ( f 1) THETELEVISION AND SOUNDBRO~ASTMG REGULATIONS, 1996 (Made by the Broadcasrinl: Commi.~.~ionon ihe 14th day LF:WIT ~IM 0f Miq: 1'996) LN 25iW 91,W Preliminary 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Television and Sound Broad- cn~non casting Regulations, 1996. 2. In these Regulations- rnl- "adult programmes" means programmes which depict or display sexual organs or conduct in ar! explicit and offensive manner; "authorized person" means a person authorized by the Commission to perform duties pursuant to these Regulations; "'broadcasting station" means any premises from which broadcast programmes originate; "licensee" means a person who is licensed under the Act; "zone" means a zone established pursuant to regulation 27. Licences 3.-+ 1) Evqpem who is desirous of- m~ktiar or t~cnne (a) engaging in commercial broadcasting, non-commercial broad- carting or offering subscriber television senice shall make an application to the Commission on zhe appropriate application Flm fam set out in the First Schedule; Mdda THE TELEVISlON AND SOl/ND BROADCAflI~3'G REGC;IlL/1TlO,VS, 1996 (b) establishing, maintaining or operating a radio redifision system shall make application to the Commission in such form as the Commission may determine. (2) Every application shall be accompanied by a non-refundable fee af one hundred and ten thousand dollars. (3) The Commission may, on receipt of an application, require the applicant to furnish the Commission
    [Show full text]
  • ECC Report 188
    ECC Report 188 Future Harmonised Use of 1452-1492 MHz in CEPT approved February 2013 ECC REPORT 188 - Page 2 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1452-1492 MHz band has remained unused in most European countries for the past decade. Since 2002, the 1452-1479.5 MHz sub-band has been harmonised for Terrestrial Digital Audio Broadcasting systems (T-DAB) through the Maastricht, 2002 Special Arrangement. The arrangement was later revised in Constanţa, in 2007 [1]. Since 2003, the 1479.5-1492 MHz sub-band has been harmonised for Satellite Digital Audio Broadcasting (S-DAB) through the ECC/ DEC/(03)02 [2]. The 1452-1492 MHz is indifferently referenced to, in Europe, as the L-band, 1.4 GHz or 1.5 GHz. Late 2010, CEPT decided to undertake a review of the use of the L-band with the aim to change the current situation and enable the use of those 40 MHz of prime spectrum for new services and applications that could bring substantial social and economic benefits for Europe. In December 2010, the ECC launched a questionnaire to CEPT administrations and industry in order to identify the current and potential candidate applications. In May 2011, the ECC established a Project Team to determine, based on an impact analysis, the most appropriate future use(s) of the 1452-1492 MHz band in CEPT. In order to conduct the impact analysis, a number of criteria have been defined, namely 1) compatibility with the current regulatory framework, 2) possibility to share with other applications/uses, 3) extent (maximisation) of social and economic benefits, 4) timeframe for availability of equipment on a large scale and for application deployment - status of standardisation and 5) Potential for economy of scale (need and potential for harmonisation within and outside CEPT).
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Television (1945, 1952) ………………………
    Transformative Choices: A Review of 70 Years of FCC Decisions Sherille Ismail FCC Staff Working Paper 1 Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 October, 2010 FCC Staff Working Papers are intended to stimulate discussion and critical comment within the FCC, as well as outside the agency, on issues that may affect communications policy. The analyses and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the FCC, other Commission staff members, or any Commissioner. Given the preliminary character of some titles, it is advisable to check with the authors before quoting or referencing these working papers in other publications. Recent titles are listed at the end of this paper and all titles are available on the FCC website at http://www.fcc.gov/papers/. Abstract This paper presents a historical review of a series of pivotal FCC decisions that helped shape today’s communications landscape. These decisions generally involve the appearance of a new technology, communications device, or service. In many cases, they involve spectrum allocation or usage. Policymakers no doubt will draw their own conclusions, and may even disagree, about the lessons to be learned from studying the past decisions. From an academic perspective, however, a review of these decisions offers an opportunity to examine a commonly-asserted view that U.S. regulatory policies — particularly in aviation, trucking, and telecommunications — underwent a major change in the 1970s, from protecting incumbents to promoting competition. The paper therefore examines whether that general view is reflected in FCC policies. It finds that there have been several successful efforts by the FCC, before and after the 1970s, to promote new entrants, especially in the markets for commercial radio, cable television, telephone equipment, and direct broadcast satellites.
    [Show full text]