DOCSLIB.ORG

The Development of a Standardized Method Testing for Lactose and Fructose Intolerance and Malabsorption

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Development of a Standardized Method Testing for Lactose and Fructose Intolerance and Malabsorption Sickly Sweet: The Development of a Standardized Method Testing for Lactose and Fructose Intolerance and Malabsorption Taylor Lawless East Carolina University Faculty Mentor: Kimberly B. Myers East Carolina University ABSTRACT Lactose intolerance has been a known cause of gastrointestinal distress for many years. Recently, scientists have discovered that fructose intolerance elicits many of the same symp- toms as lactose intolerance. The consumption of fructose has more than doubled in the past twenty years; similarly, the instances of fructose intolerance have also increased. Fructose and lactose intolerance are measured using similar methods. While there are common prac- tices and guidelines used when testing for fructose and lactose intolerance and malabsorptive issues, there is no official standard method including precise practices for before, during, and after the test. Therefore, in the present study a standardized form and set of recommendations were suggested by comparing methods used in previous studies. If used on a wide scale, the standard system would enable researchers to compare results of different studies. Ultimately, this would help researchers gain a better understanding of lactose and fructose intolerance and malabsorptive issues and to measure the frequency of diagnoses for each condition in order to develop improved treatments and potential cures. actose intolerance has been a popular are not completely understood, there is re- Ltopic in the study of nutrition for many search being conducted on the different types years. Many people suffer from irritable of sugar malabsorption and intolerance. bowel syndrome (IBS) due to the sugar lac- Malabsorption refers to sugar not being prop- tose found in dairy1. Interestingly, as fructose erly broken down in the gastrointestinal tract4 has become more prevalent in the human di- and intolerance implies that the body is inca- ets, people have begun suffering similar mal- pable of breaking down the sugar5. Thus, re- absorpitve effects. searchers are interested in questions regard- Lactose intolerance can cause an array ing the relation between the type of sugars of painful and irritating symptoms such as individuals are consuming and the way the gas, bloating, diarrhea, vomiting and nau- sugars are absorbed and metabolized. sea2. These same symptoms have been ob- Fructose consumption has more than served in those with fructose intolerance3. doubled in the past 20 years due to the use Because the causes of sugar malabsorption of the inexpensive sweetener high fructose 92 Taylor Lawless corn syrup3. Fructose is naturally found in ambiguity of varied extant testing systems. fruits and some vegetables. It is also part The research questions for the present of the simple sugar sucrose, which is a di- study were 1) what are the common charac- saccharide commonly known as table sugar. teristics of the methods and results published Sucrose is comprised of glucose and fructose in the current literature, and 2) could the molecules, which are both monosaccharides. common features of testing be combined to High fructose corn syrup contains a higher create a standard method for testing? A lit- percentage of fructose than glucose. Its use erature review on fructose and lactose malab- is controversial as it is added to many foods sorption studies was conducted. The review as a sweetener because it is less expensive, was conducted after analyzing published arti- but not necessarily healthier, than table sugar. cles about fructose and lactose malabsorption It has been said that the increase in instances and intolerance in order to build a knowledge of intolerance is because it fructose is now in foundation about common practices. The pri- more foods6. mary focus of the review was on the methods While the full effect of this increase of used for diagnosis, and the results obtained fructose in foods is not yet known, more in- in the treatment studies. The methods used stances of fructose malabsorption are being for diagnosis often affected the conclusions diagnosed. Some attribute this malabsorp- about the results, thus, we reviewed methods tion to the metabolic pathway of fructose, and results together. speculating that fructose is absorbed by fa- cilitated diffusion or that fructose can only be Literature Review absorbed with glucose5. While the absorp- tion of fructose is still being studied, it is One of the most referenced studies was known that the enzyme lactase breaks lactose one by Choi et al. 3. The objective of this into the simple sugars galactose and glucose study was to determine how common fruc- in the human body7. tose intolerance was in the sample popula- Fructose and lactose malabsorption and in- tion and to see if lifestyle changes regarding tolerance can impact the life of an individual fructose intake would have an effect on IBS tremendously, and misdiagnosis of these con- experienced by the patients. The research- ditions can also have negative implications. ers questioned how effective the fructose If a person is incorrectly diagnosed with an restricted diets would be for limiting IBS. intolerance, the individual may eliminate the Those with positive hydrogen breath test re- sugar from the diet unnecessarily2,8. That is sults were deemed fructose intolerant. The particularly concerning with lactose because patients who produced a positive breath test restriction of lactose can lead to calcium de- were then given a kit that contained informa- ficiencies9. A diagnosis implying the person tion regarding a fructose restricted diet and is not intolerant when the person is can be were asked to implement the diet. After one dangerous as well since the person will con- year, patients were asked to return and repeat tinue to consume the sugar and experience the same tests and surveys. In addition, the discomfort1. patients answered questions regarding how Hydrogen breath tests are the primary tool strictly the diet was followed according to used to measure fructose and lactose malab- the guidelines and how much time was spent sorption and intolerances. The inconsisten- following the guidelines3. cies associated with conducting such tests The results showed that of the 80 partici- have raised questions regarding the validity pants, 31 had a positive fructose breath test. of the results1. Testing differences also makes Greater than 90% of those with a positive test it difficult for scientists to compare results. claimed that the test caused the usual gastro- For these reasons, we recommend a stan- intestinal discomfort symptoms, which have dard system of measurement to alleviate the been attributed to fructose intolerance. The 93 Explorations |Natural Science and Engineering patients reported that the lifestyle changes Review of best practices: Comparison and had a mild to moderate effect on their life- analysis style (a rating of 2.93 on a 5-point scale). The researcher concluded that there was a corre- Best practices from several reviewed lation between the lifestyle changes and the studies were used to create a “standardized symptoms of those in the positive test group3. method and tool.” Inclusion criterion for the Da Silva Mederios, et al. 2 reported on a studies were 1) publication dates between pediatric population. In the pretest proce- 2008 and 2012 and 2) the use of a hydrogen dure, the children’s height and weight were breath test and the measurement of the sugars measured and parents were asked to fill out fructose, lactose or lactulose. Representative a symptom form for their children2. This is studies reviewed are included in Table 1. a potential source of bias as the parents can- The six variables noted for each study were not feel exactly what their children do. The Primary Researcher; Publication; Year; Sugar children were given a hydrogen breath test Tested; Subjects; Pre-Test; During Test; and which was used to determine whether or not Results. “Primary researcher and publication they were an absorber of lactose or malab- year” were used to identify the study. The sorber. The night before, they were asked to “sugar tested” variable noted whether the eat white rice with chicken and not to eat af- study examined fructose, lactose, lactulose ter the meal2. or a combination of the three. The “subjects” Calcium deficiencies were examined in this variable identified the age group, gender, and study. While most of the studies on calcium general information about the participants in absorption focus on adult populations, this the study. The “pre-test” variable described study is one of the few that has examined a the practices and procedures before the test. younger population. Other studies found that The “during test” variable detailed how the the calcium intake was much lower among test was conducted. The “results” variable the lactose intolerant; however, this study did was used to list the findings of each study. not support that theory; there was no statis- The results of the compilation can be found tical difference in bone density between the in Table 1. Common trends were observed two groups (absorbers and malabsorbers)2. and the most effective methods were deter- The lives of individuals could be improved mined by the researchers. We determined by the results of the studies about fructose the most consistent methods according to the and lactose. For example, researchers sug- table. Then the best practices were selected gest that by limiting lactose in the diet, the to be compiled for the creation of a standard- pain suffered by afflicted children could be ized tool. reduced10. Other researchers4 determined that The standardized tool can be seen in Figure fructose and lactose malabsorption can be the 1. The standardized tool is a form with proce- cause of recurrent abdominal pain and that re- dures that are to be followed and is to be com- moving the malabsorbed sugar from the diet pleted by the physician or researcher. Each of the patient can help alleviate the symp- step of the tool was added to ensure each test toms4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Celiac Disease and Lactose Intolerance
    Celiac Disease and Lactose Intolerance HALINA WOJCIK, MPH, RDN, CDN AHRC, NY Celiac – Definition Celiac, also known as coeliac disease, celiac sprue, gluten-sensitive enteropathy, and non-tropical sprue is a genetic, hereditary autoimmune disorder. attributed to the specific genetic markers known as HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 that are present in affected individuals. Characteristics Sensitivity to amino acids found in the prolamin fraction of wheat (gliadin), barley (hordein), and rye (secalin), commonly known as glutens. When these grains are consumed by persons with celiac disease, they trigger an immune response that results in damage to the person’s mucosa of the small intestine. This damage causes the malabsorption of macronutrients and micronutrients. Source: Nutrition Care Manual. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2019: Gastrointestinal Disease: Celiac. Available from [https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org ] Comparison of lining of the small intestine in healthy individual and person with Celiac disease Prevalence of Celiac in the United States 1% of population ~ 3 million Americans It’s about the same number of people living in the state of Nevada. In the general US population: 1 in 133 people In people with first - degree relatives (parent, child, sibling) who has celiac: 1 in 22 In people with second degree relatives (aunt, uncle, cousin) who has celiac: 1 in 39 Source: Nutrition Care Manual. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2019: Gastrointestinal Disease: Celiac. Available from [https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org ] Prevalence of Celiac Disease (CD) in Down Syndrome (DS) Ample of studies suggest that CD is higher in individuals with Down Syndrome. 1 The meta-analysis study ( 31 studies included 4383 individuals) showed that individuals with DS are at very high risk of CD.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Food Allergies
    Management of Food Allergies Federal Bureau of Prisons Clinical Practice Guidelines September 2012 Clinical guidelines are made available to the public for informational purposes only. The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) does not warrant these guidelines for any other purpose, and assumes no responsibility for any injury or damage resulting from the reliance thereof. Proper medical practice necessitates that all cases are evaluated on an individual basis and that treatment decisions are patient specific. Consult the BOP Clinical Practice Guideline Web page to determine the date of the most recent update to this document: http://www.bop.gov/news/medresources.jsp. i Federal Bureau of Prisons Management of Food Allergies Clinical Practice Guidelines September 2012 Table of Contents 1. Purpose .................................................................................................................................1 2. Food Allergy Overview ........................................................................................................1 3. Food Allergy Assessment .....................................................................................................3 4. Evaluation and Management of Potential Anaphylactic Food Allergies............................4 5. Evaluation and Management of Potential Non-Anaphylactic Food Allergies ...................4 6. Diet Orders ...........................................................................................................................4 Medical Diet Orders/Self-Selection
    [Show full text]
  • 8 LECTURES Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Peptic Ulcer
    8 LECTURES Gastro-esophageal reflux disease Peptic Ulcer Disease Diarrhea Malabsorption Inflammatory bowel disease-1 Inflammatory bowel disease-2 Colonic polyps and carcinoma-1 Colonic polyps and carcinoma-2 8 LECTURES Diarrhea Malabsorption DIARREAHA Objectives Upon completion of this lecture the students should : 1. Understand the physiology of fluid in small intestine 2. Describe the pathophysiology and causes of various types of diarrhea ( Secretory, osmotic, Exudative, Motility-related ) 3. Define acute diarrhea and enumerate its common causes 4. Define chronic diarrhea and enumerate its common causes Physiology of Fluid and small intestine DIARREAHA DEFINITION • World Health Organization 3 or more loose or liquid stools per day • Abnormally high fluid content of stool > 200-300 gm/day Fecal osmolarity • As stool leaves the colon, fecal osmolality is equal to the serum osmolality i.e. 290 mosm/kg. • Under normal circumstances, the major osmoles + + – – are Na , K , Cl , and HCO3 . CLASSIFICATION 1.Acute …………….if 2 weeks, 2.Persistent ……. if 2 to 4 weeks, 3.Chronic ………..if 4 weeks in duration. Why important? • The loss of fluids through diarrhea can cause dehydration and electrolyte imbalances • Easy to treat but if untreated, may lead to death especially in children Why important? More than 70 % of almost 11 million child deaths every year are attributable to 6 causes: 1. Diarrhea 2. Malaria 3. neonatal infection 4. Pneumonia 5. preterm delivery 6. lack of oxygen at birth. UNICEF Pathophysiology Categories of diarrhea 1. Secretory 2. Osmotic 3. Exudative (inflammatory ) 4. Motility-related Secretory • There is an increase in the active secretion • High stool output • Lack of response to fasting • Normal stool osmotic gap < 100 mOsm/kg • The most common cause of this type of diarrhea is a bacterial toxin ( E.
    [Show full text]
  • Lactose-Intolerant Kids Should Get Some Dairy
    50 Digestive Disorders FAMILY P RACTICE N EWS • October 15, 2006 Lactose-Intolerant Kids Should Get Some Dairy BY MICHELE G. SULLIVAN The document is the first AAP lactose tive Americans, followed by blacks and “The avoidance of milk products to Mid-Atlantic Bureau guideline update since 1990 (Pediatrics Hispanics. The incidence is very low in control symptoms may be problematic 2006;118:1279-86). whites, whose northern European her- for optimal bone mineralization. Children t is usually not necessary to eliminate A statement from the American Dairy itage seems to be protective, according the who avoid milk have been documented to dairy foods from the diets of lactose-in- Council hailed the AAP guidelines as a guidelines. Among white children, symp- ingest less than the recommended Itolerant children and adolescents, and common sense approach to a problem toms typically don’t develop until after age amounts of calcium needed for normal doing so may compromise their long-term that sometimes prevents children from 4 or 5 years; they may manifest earlier in bone calcium accretion and bone miner- skeletal health. getting milk’s unique nutritional package other groups. alization.” Most of these patients still can consume of protein, vitamins, and minerals. Newborns who develop intractable di- Most lactose-intolerant children can enough dairy every day to meet their cal- “Although calci- arrhea after consum- tolerate varying amounts of dairy, de- cium and vitamin D needs, especially if um-fortified bever- Rice and soy milks are not ing any mammalian pending on their individual symptoms: they drink lactose-reduced milk and eat ages and other foods milk product, includ- One glass of milk may be fine, but two yogurt with live cultures and/or aged can provide an alter- good substitutes for dairy ing human milk, may may provoke diarrhea.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Patients with Lactose Intolerance Exhibit More Frequent Comorbidities
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Annals of Gastroenterology (2016) 29, 174-179 Do patients with lactose intolerance exhibit more frequent comorbidities than patients without lactose intolerance? An analysis of routine data from German medical practices Rebecca Schiff nera, Karel Kostevb, Holger Gothea,c University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria; IMS Health, Epidemiology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany Abstract Background Th e increase in food intolerances poses a burgeoning problem in our society. Food intolerances not only lead to physical impairment of the individual patient but also result in a high socio-economic burden due to factors such as the treatment required as well as absenteeism. Th e present study aimed to explore whether lactose intolerant (LI) patients exhibit more frequent comorbidities than non-LI patients. Methods Th e study was conducted on a case-control basis and the results were determined using routine data analysis. Routine data from the IMS Disease Analyzer database were used for this purpose. A total of 6,758 data records were processed and analyzed. Results Th ere were signifi cant correlations between LI and the incidence of osteoporosis, changes in mental status, and the presence of additional food intolerances. Comparing 3,379 LI vs. 3,379 non-LI patients, 34.5% vs. 17.7% (P<0.0001) suff ered from abdominal pain; 30.6% vs. 17.2% (P<0.0001) from gastrointestinal infections; and 20.9% vs. 16.0% (P=0.0053) from depression. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were the highest for fructose intolerance (n=229 LI vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lactose Intolerance Brochure
    Lactose Intolerance Albert F. Chiemprabha, M.D. Pierce D. Dotherow, M.D. Reed B. Hogan, M.D. James H. Johnston, III, M.D. Ronald P. Kotfila, M.D. Billy W. Long, M.D. J. Trippe McNeese, M.D. Paul B. Milner, M.D. Michelle A. Petro, M.D. Vonda Reeves-Darby, M.D. Sara Rippel, M.D., Pediatric GI Matt Runnels, M.D. Vishwanath N. Shenoy, M.D. James Q. Sones, II, M.D. April Ulmer, M.D., Pediatric GI James A. Underwood, Jr., M.D. Mark E. Wilson, M.D. Cindy Haden Wright, M.D. Keith Brown, M.D., Pathologist Samuel Hensley, M.D., Pathologist Jackson Madison Vicksburg 1421 N. State Street, Ste 203 106 Highland Way 1815 Mission 66 Jackson, MS 39202 Madison, MS 39110 Vicksburg, MS 39180 601/355-1234 601/355-1234 601/638-8801 Fax 601/352-4882 • 800/880-1231 www.msgastrodocs.com ©2011 GI Associates & Endoscopy Center. All rights reserved. Dairy Products Calcium Content Lactose Content Table of contents Ice cream/ice milk (8 oz.) 176 mg. 6-7g Milk 291-316 mg. 12-13g (whole, low-fat, skim, buttermilk, 8 oz.) Processed cheese (1 oz.) 159-215 mg. 12-13g Sour cream (4 oz.) 134 mg. 4-5g Yogurt (plain, 8 oz.) 274-415 mg. 12-13g Fish/Seafood Calcium Content Lactose Content Oysters (1 cup, raw) 226 mg. 0 Salmon with bones (canned, 3 oz.) 167 mg. 0 Sardines (3 oz.) 371 mg. 0 Shrimp (canned, 3 oz.) 98 mg. 0 Other Calcium Content Lactose Content Molasses (2 tbsp.) 274 mg.
    [Show full text]
  • Lactose Intolerance and Health: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, No
    Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 192 Lactose Intolerance and Health Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. HHSA 290-2007-10064-I Prepared by: Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, Minneapolis, MN Investigators Timothy J. Wilt, M.D., M.P.H. Aasma Shaukat, M.D., M.P.H. Tatyana Shamliyan, M.D., M.S. Brent C. Taylor, Ph.D., M.P.H. Roderick MacDonald, M.S. James Tacklind, B.S. Indulis Rutks, B.S. Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg, M.D. Robert L. Kane, M.D. Michael Levitt, M.D. AHRQ Publication No. 10-E004 February 2010 This report is based on research conducted by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHSA 290-2007-10064-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to help clinicians, employers, policymakers, and others make informed decisions about the provision of health care services. This report is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for clinical judgment. This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Liver Cirrhosis: a Patient Resource Guide
    LIVER CIRRHOSIS: A PATIENT RESOURCE GUIDE 502-588-4600 What is the liver? The liver is the body’s largest internal organ. It is an essential organ and the body cannot survive without it. The liver has many important functions including: • Preventing infections • Removing bacteria and toxins from the blood • Produce “juices” needed for digesting food and processing medications and hormones • Making proteins that help the blood clot • Storing vitamins, minerals, fats, and sugars for use by the body Normal liver liver with cirrhosis What is liver cirrhosis? When something attacks and damages the liver, liver cells are killed and scar tissue is formed. This scarring process is called fibrosis (pronounced “fi-bro-sis”), and it happens slowly over many years. When the whole liver is scarred, it shrinks and hardens. This is called cirrhosis. Any illness that affects the liver over a long period of time may lead to fibrosis and, eventually, cirrhosis. Heavy drinking and viruses (like hepatitis C or B) are common causes of cirrhosis. However, there are other causes as well. Cirrhosis may be caused by a buildup of fat in the liver of people who are overweight or have diabetes. Some people inherit genes that cause liver disease. Other causes include certain prescribed and over-the-counter medicines, environmental poisons, and autoimmune liver disease, a condition in which a person’s own immune system attacks the liver as if it were a foreign body. What happens when you have cirrhosis? Cirrhosis causes the liver to become lumpy and stiff. This prevents blood from flowing through the liver easily and causes the build-up of pressure in the portal vein, the vein that brings blood to the liver.
    [Show full text]
  • Lactose Intolerance
    Lactose Intolerance Enzyme Digestion Lab Activity SCIENTIFIC BIO AX! Introduction F Intestinal gas, bloating, and stomach cramps—oh my! This can be a common concern for a majority of the world’s population who lack the enzyme to digest certain foods. Milk and dairy products, for example, cause problems for many people who lack the enzyme required to digest lactose, the main carbohydrate found in milk. This lab activity illustrates the use of a commercial enzyme product called Lactaid™ as an aid in milk digestion. Concepts • Enzyme • Disaccharide • Metabolism Materials Galactose, 2 g Balloons, 4 Lactaid™, ½ tablet, Graduated cylinder, 10 mL Lactose, 4 g Mini soda bottles, 4 Sucrose, 2 g Resealable plastic bag Yeast, suspension, 40 mL Water bath, 35–40 °C Safety Precautions Wear chemical splash goggles, chemical-resistant gloves, and a chemical-resistant apron. Wash hands thoroughly with soap and water before leaving the laboratory. Follow all laboratory safety guidelines. Please review current Safety Data Sheets for additional safety, handling, and disposal information. Procedure 1. Obtain a warm water bath (35–40 °C) or an insulating block. Place the test Lactose tubes in the insulating block or test tube rack. plus Lactose Sucrose Galactose Lactaid 2. Weigh out the dry ingredients prior to the demonstration. 3. Review the summary diagram of the demonstration setup shown in Figure 1. 4. Clearly label each test tube as shown in Figure 1. 5. Place 2 g of the appropriate dry sugar into each test tube, as shown in Figure 1. 6. Add pre-ground Lactaid™ tablet to one flask containing 2 g lactose, as shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lactose Intolerance in Adults: Biological Mechanism and Dietary Management
    Nutrients 2015, 7, 8020-8035; doi:10.3390/nu7095380 OPEN ACCESS nutrients ISSN 2072-6643 www.mdpi.com/journal/nutrients Review Lactose Intolerance in Adults: Biological Mechanism and Dietary Management Yanyong Deng 1, Benjamin Misselwitz 2, Ning Dai 1 and Mark Fox 2,3,* 1 Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, 310016 Hangzhou, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (Y.D.); [email protected] (N.D.) 2 Neurogastroenterology and Motility Research Group, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich CH-8091, Switzerland; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Division of Gastroenterology, St. Claraspital, 4058 Basel, Switzerland * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-791934795. Received: 14 July 2015 / Accepted: 14 September 2015 / Published: 18 September 2015 Abstract: Lactose intolerance related to primary or secondary lactase deficiency is characterized by abdominal pain and distension, borborygmi, flatus, and diarrhea induced by lactose in dairy products. The biological mechanism and lactose malabsorption is established and several investigations are available, including genetic, endoscopic and physiological tests. Lactose intolerance depends not only on the expression of lactase but also on the dose of lactose, intestinal flora, gastrointestinal motility, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and sensitivity of the gastrointestinal tract to the generation of gas and other fermentation products of lactose digestion. Treatment of lactose intolerance can include lactose-reduced diet and enzyme replacement. This is effective if symptoms are only related to dairy products; however, lactose intolerance can be part of a wider intolerance to variably absorbed, fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs).
    [Show full text]
  • Assignment Discovery Online Curriculum Digestion Curriculum
    Assignment Discovery Online Curriculum Digestion Curriculum Focus Health Grade level 9-12 Duration One or two class periods Objectives Students will • research one common problem of the digestive system, such as constipation, gas, lactose intolerance, or ulcers • create a brochure, similar to one found at a doctor’s office, that describes the problem, its causes, symptoms, and possible treatments Materials • Paper (8½ x 11 inches) • Pens, pencils • Computer with Internet access Procedures 1. Begin the lesson by reviewing the major organs of the digestive system and the function of each. Make sure your discussion covers at least the following parts of the digestive tract: esophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, and colon. You will find a good overview at: Discovery Health: Healthy Digestion http://health.discovery.com/centers/digestive/digestion.html 2. Ask students to name some of the problems of the digestive system covered in the video. Challenge students to link each condition with the appropriate part of the digestive tract. Below are some common digestive problems. (See “Vocabulary” for definitions.) • nausea • diarrhea • constipation • acid indigestion (heartburn) • gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) • ulcer • lactose intolerance • colorectal polyps or colorectal cancer 3. Have students work individually to create a patient brochure about one digestive problem. The brochure, similar to one they might see in a doctor’s office, should describe the problem, its causes, symptoms, and possible treatments. In addition, the brochure should be written and designed for a specific audience, such as kids, teens, young adults, middle-age adults, or older adults. When selecting an appropriate audience, ask students to consider what age a patient might be when he or she has questions about that problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    Living with Irritable Bowel Syndrome Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a condition affecting your digestive tract. There is no definite cause for IBS, but several factors may trigger IBS symptoms: • low fibre diet • high fat diet • food intolerances • increased use of antibiotics • intestinal infections • busy lifestyle/stress • stomach surgery • emotional upset • combination of the above factors IBS symptoms can include: bowel pain, changes in bowel habits (diarrhea, constipation or both), bloating and gas, nausea, mucus in your stools, feeling of having an incomplete bowel movement, or frequent urge to move your bowels. You may experience some or all of these symptoms but not necessarily at the same time. It is important to identify your own symptoms and the factors that trigger them. Diet, lifestyle changes and possibly medications may be needed to manage your symptoms. Management and Relief of IBS Symptoms 1. Remember that your bowel is normal – just irritable. 2. Your bowel will be at its best on a regular routine, such as eating meals at regular times throughout the day, and getting adequate sleep. 3. Identify and limit foods that trigger symptoms. 4. Eat plenty of fibre. 5. Identify sources of stress and strategies to manage them. 6. Practice relaxation strategies. 7. Enjoy regular physical activity. IBS is very individual and people have varying symptoms. Dietary management and treatment of IBS is based on an individual’s specific symptoms. Therefore, self monitoring is important. This can include a journal to record food intake, symptoms, and stress. Page 1 of 7 The following information will help you manage your IBS symptoms through changes in your diet.
    [Show full text]