474 Pennsylvania Gleanings in England. PENNSYLVANIA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

474 Pennsylvania Gleanings in England. PENNSYLVANIA 474 Pennsylvania Gleanings in England. PENNSYLVANIA GLEANINGS IN ENGLAND. BY LOTHOP WITHINGTOBT. GEORGE MAUND, Citizen and Merchant taylor of London. Will dated 4 June 1703; proved 1 November 1703. To my sister Barbary Pepiat of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, £50, and all my lands in Backs County in that Province. If she be dead, between my cousin Elizabeth Wheatcroft and sister Ann Peppiatt of London. To cousin Elizabeth Wheatcroft Picture of me and my wife, To my uncle Gemhem Wheatcroft £5 and to his wife £5. To my uncle Henry Davison £10. To Elizabeth Bembricke £10. All the rest, and salary due from Company of Whipmakers, to Mr, William Bembricke and Mr. Robert Dowley of London, Wyredrawer, joint executors. Note that it is the desire of George Maund to be buryed in Gindalls ground by his wife and that his bowels be taken out and buried in a Cask by themslves and that he be embalmed within and without the ancient way and laid in a Deal coffin, covered lead and soddered up. Witnesses: Jocelyn Dansey, Ed: Newbolt. London, October 24, 1703. To My Partners, Sir Richard Blackmore, Sir James Eaton, Mr. Hacker, Mr. Whiting, Mr. Campheild, Mr. Chance, and Mr. Thursby, 20s. ring each. Ditto to Mr. Holester Mr. Bembricke, and Mr. Robert Dawley. To Thomas Jones, and John Shurley, 10s. rings. To Mrs. Newbolt the Table bedstead. To William, servant in this house, 10s. My clothes to be valued and money given to Mr. Henry Davison in Chiswell Street. To Mr. Francis Clarke 10s. when he pays a debt of 40s. To Mr. Carnell a 10s. ring. Mr. Wase in King Street to open me. Cosin Thomas Maund to have 10s. Degg, 192. JAMES THOMAS late of Philadelphia [in Pennsylvania, but now of St Margarets, Lothbury, London-Private Act Book] Pennsylvania Gleanings in England. 475 Will dated 22/4/1706; proved 11 February 1711. To my Bro. Micah Thomas & his children £30. To my Bro. Gabriell Thomas (& what he oweth me) £20. To my Sister Mary Snead & her children £20. To my Sister Eachel Wharton £40. To my Unkle James Thomas £20 a year for life. To my cousins or neeces Elizabeth Mary & Rachel "Williams £50 each after dec of my said Unkle J. T. To my nephew the Bro of Sd Williams if living £50. To my cousins the children of Thomas Wharton & Rachell my sister after dec of Sd TJnkle J. T. £20 each. To my executors £50 as follows. To Edward Shippen Sen8 & his Grchildren Edward & Elizabeth Shippen £20. To Samuel Preston & his daus Margaret & Hannah £30. To the poor of Philadelphila the interest of remainder of my estate after the death of my said Unkle J. T. Executors: Edward Shippen & Samuel Preston. Merchants of Philadelphia. Witnesses: Philip Russell, Walter Haling, Jonathan Baily, Morris Edwards, Sussex on Delaware Bay. 7 November 1710. Jonathan Baily, <fc Philip Russell depose to Tho: Fisher Register for Co Suffolk of the truth of above. 38 Barnes. WILLIAM LOGAN of the City of Bristol, Doctor of Physick. Will 29 October 1757; proved 4 January 1758. To my two sisters in Law, Rachell and Elizabeth Parsons, my lands in the parishes of East and West Charlton, county Somerset. To Ann Parsons, daughter of Henry Parsons, late of Bristol, Grocer, deceased, £100, to be paid to Wil- liam Barnes, Esq., her grandfather. To my sister in law, Amelia Parsons, £100. To Rachell, Elizabeth, and Amelia, all the plate which was my wife's at my marriage with her. To my Brother in law, Giles Bayly, Esq., £100. To my Brothers in law, William Shepheard and John Shepheard, £100 each. To Rachel, wife of—Hilhouse, merchant, and her sister Mary Parsons, £20 each. To my niece, Hannah Smith, wife of John Smith, of Phyladelphia in America, £1000. To the two daughters of my Nephew Isaac Morris of Pennsilvania in America, by Sarah his 476 Pennsylvania Gleanings in England, wife my late niece deceased, £100. To Nephew James Logan, £1500. To my friend James Macarthy, merchant, my Gold watch and gold headed cane. To the Infirmary in Mandlin Lane £100. To William Biss, my coachman, 2 ginueas. To John —, my footman, £5. To servant maids, Ann and Hannah, £5 each. Residuary Legatee: Nephew William Logan, merchant, and if he dies, his children. Executors : Giles Bayly and Archibald Drummond, Dr. of Physic, to whom I give 30 ginueas and my MS Common- place Book. Witnesses: Walt. Hawkesworth, Thomas Evans, Jno. Grigg. Button, 17. RICHARD MATHER. Will 28 June 1758; proved 18 April 1763. Lake George Camp. Dear Bror. June ye 28, 1758. We have a large Army encamped here, healthy and in good Spirits waiting in a few Days to go into our Battoos for Ticonderoga Crown Pointt 1ST. We are hourly expect- ing news from Louisbourgh as yet have had no good from that Quarter. Capt. Lee is very well I releived him on a guard yesterday in his Indian Dress which he seems very fond of. The Capt L* is gone to Louisbourgh, you must excuse my short Lre as I have just seen the orders of an Express's going to New York in an hour's time which time is almost expired. I wrote my last from New York in Case you have not received it I shall mention to you that I have left £500 Peices Curency which is near £300 St. in the hands of a Mr. Stedman, Merchant at Philadelphia and besides which whenever the Royal Americans Accounts are settled there will be a Ballance considerable due to me all which I leave to you in case of Accidents. I (thank God) am now in the most perfect Health indeed I took Care all Winter to lay in a good Store my Love to you all with com- pliments to all friends from your Afit Brother Richd Mather (you'll hear from me the first oppty) P. Packet To Thomas Mather Esq at Chester, Europe. Pennsylvania Gleanings in England. 477 18 April 1763, administration granted to Brother Thomas, next of kin to Richard Mather, late Captain of 1 Batt Roy Americans, now in Pittsburgh, N. A. deceased. "Witnesses; Thomas Mather, Proger Mather, Witter Ouming Caesar, 190. [ROCKINGHAM, 645.] WILLIAM GALE, of the Parish of St. James in the County of Cornwall, in the Island of Jamaica, Esquire, now residing in the Parish of Saint George Hanover Square, in the County of Middlesex, in the Kingdom of Great Britain. Will 30 October 1784; proved 11 December 1784. To Executors, all unsettled or uncultivated Lands, to wit half part of 300 acres at Lambs Spring, in Parish of Saint Elizabeth in said Island of Jamaica, Patented in name of my late Father, John Gale, deceased, and half of two other Runs of Land of 300 acres each at Burnt Savannah in said parish of Saint Elizabeth, one Patented in name of said John Gale, and other in name of John Eastwick (the other Moieties of said three Runs of Land being the property of the Widow of my late Brother, Jonathan Gale, deceased), also the Moietys of three Runs of 300 acres each at Lambs Spring, aforesaid, Patented in names of John, Jonathan, and Joseph Dicken- son, one in name of each of them, also my undivided Moities of Lands, late of Joseph Dickenson, deceased, in City of Philadelphia, and in Pensylvania and Isew Jersey, in trust to sell said lands etc, and money to be laid out in purchase of Slaves and other purposes for improvement of my Sugar Plantation, and said Slaves and improvements to be part of residue of estate etc. I desire that David Lewis, son of my sister Mary Lewis, deceased, to be educated and maintained at charge of my estate till 21., and then annuity of £100 sterling for life over money in my hands belonging to him (about £1000 Jamaica Currency) owing for part of his late Mother's fortune left in my hands and settled under deed of trust executed in Jamaica by his late Father and Mother about A. D. 1760 etc. I desire my Plantation and Sugar 478 Pennsylvania Gleanings in England. Work called York and Lands belonging in Parishes of St. James and Trelawney, in said Island of Jamaica, also several Penns and Lands in said Parishes, and Negro and other Slaves, Cattle, Utensils, and other lands in Jamaica or else- where to Friend and Kinsman, Edward Morant, late of Jamaica, but now of Brockenhurst in the County of Hants, Esquire, and Friends, Henry Dawkins, also late of Jamaica, now of Handlinch in county of Wilts, and Beeston Long the Elder, and Samuel Long of the City of London, Esquires until 1 January 1796 upon Trust to Mortgage same, also to complete improvements upon Sugar Plantation called York, according to plan already fixed under direction of my attor- ney in Jamaica, compleating New Works now nearly finished and repairing old works, so as to have two good setts of Works, also to purchase Slaves, Coppers, Still, etc. to com- pleat the number of 700 slaves for use of said Plantations and Pens, and upon Finishing Trust to pay out of Profits to my kinsman John Morant, son of said Edward Morant, the yerely sum of £200 during period of the trust, and after 1 January 1796, said Trust estate (subject to annuity of £200 to said John Morant and assigns for joint lives of said John Morant and Edward Morant, to Edward Gregory Morant, youngest son of said Edward Morant, provided he take the name of G-ale, but in trust to said Henry Dawkins, Beeston Long, and Samuel Long to preserve contingent remainders to heirs male of said Edward Gregory Morant all taking name of Gale, in default to John Fisher, son of Mrs.
Recommended publications
  • JAMES LOGAN the Political Career of a Colonial Scholar
    JAMES LOGAN The Political Career of a Colonial Scholar By E. GORDON ALDERFER* A CROSS Sixth Street facing the shaded lawn of Independence Square in Philadelphia, on the plot now hidden by the pomp- ous facade of The Curtis Publishing Company, once stood a curious little building that could with some justice lay claim to being the birthplace of the classic spirit of early America. Just as the State House across the way symbolizes the birth of independ- ence and revolutionary idealism, the first public home of the Loganian Library could represent (were it still standing) the balanced, serene, inquiring type of mind so largely responsible for nurturing the civilization of the colonies. The Loganian, the first free public library in America outside of Boston and by some odds the greatest collection for public use in the colonial era, was the creation of James Logan, occasionally reputed to have been the most learned man in the colonies during the first half of the eighteenth century. Logan journeyed to Amer- ica with William Penn in 1699 as Penn's secretary, and became in effect the resident head of the province. Two years later, when Penn left his province never to return, Logan was commissioned Secretary of the Province and Commissioner of Property. He was soon installed as Clerk of the Provincial Council and became its most influential member in spite of his youthfulness. Even- tually, in 1731, Logan became Chief Justice of Pennsylvania, and, five years later, as President of the Provincial Council, he assumed *Dr. E. Gordon Alderfer is associated with CARE, Inc., New York, in a research and administrative capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania Assembly's Conflict with the Penns, 1754-1768
    Liberty University “The Jaws of Proprietary Slavery”: The Pennsylvania Assembly’s Conflict With the Penns, 1754-1768 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the History Department in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts in History by Steven Deyerle Lynchburg, Virginia March, 2013 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: Liberty or Security: Outbreak of Conflict Between the Assembly and Proprietors ......9 Chapter 2: Bribes, Repeals, and Riots: Steps Toward a Petition for Royal Government ..............33 Chapter 3: Securing Privilege: The Debates and Election of 1764 ...............................................63 Chapter 4: The Greater Threat: Proprietors or Parliament? ...........................................................90 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................113 1 Introduction In late 1755, the vituperative Reverend William Smith reported to his proprietor Thomas Penn that there was “a most wicked Scheme on Foot to run things into Destruction and involve you in the ruins.” 1 The culprits were the members of the colony’s unicameral legislative body, the Pennsylvania Assembly (also called the House of Representatives). The representatives held a different opinion of the conflict, believing that the proprietors were the ones scheming, in order to “erect their desired Superstructure of despotic Power, and reduce to
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting the University of Pennsylvania's Connection to Slavery
    Documenting the University of Pennsylvania’s Connection to Slavery Clay Scott Graubard The University of Pennsylvania, Class of 2019 April 19, 2018 © 2018 CLAY SCOTT GRAUBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 OVERVIEW 3 LABOR AND CONSTRUCTION 4 PRIMER ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COLLEGE AND ACADEMY OF PHILADELPHIA 5 EBENEZER KINNERSLEY (1711 – 1778) 7 ROBERT SMITH (1722 – 1777) 9 THOMAS LEECH (1685 – 1762) 11 BENJAMIN LOXLEY (1720 – 1801) 13 JOHN COATS (FL. 1719) 13 OTHERS 13 LABOR AND CONSTRUCTION CONCLUSION 15 FINANCIAL ASPECTS 17 WEST INDIES FUNDRAISING 18 SOUTH CAROLINA FUNDRAISING 25 TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE AND ACADEMY OF PHILADELPHIA 31 WILLIAM ALLEN (1704 – 1780) AND JOSEPH TURNER (1701 – 1783): FOUNDERS AND TRUSTEES 31 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN (1706 – 1790): FOUNDER, PRESIDENT, AND TRUSTEE 32 EDWARD SHIPPEN (1729 – 1806): TREASURER OF THE TRUSTEES AND TRUSTEE 33 BENJAMIN CHEW SR. (1722 – 1810): TRUSTEE 34 WILLIAM SHIPPEN (1712 – 1801): FOUNDER AND TRUSTEE 35 JAMES TILGHMAN (1716 – 1793): TRUSTEE 35 NOTE REGARDING THE TRUSTEES 36 FINANCIAL ASPECTS CONCLUSION 37 CONCLUSION 39 THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 40 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 42 BIBLIOGRAPHY 43 DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 2 INTRODUCTION DOCUMENTING PENN’S CONNECTION TO SLAVERY 3 Overview The goal of this paper is to present the facts regarding the University of Pennsylvania’s (then the College and Academy of Philadelphia) significant connections to slavery and the slave trade. The first section of the paper will cover the construction and operation of the College and Academy in the early years. As slavery was integral to the economy of British North America, to fully understand the University’s connection to slavery the second section will cover the financial aspects of the College and Academy, its Trustees, and its fundraising.
    [Show full text]
  • Balch Family Papers
    Collection 3058 Balch Family Papers Papers, 1755-1963 (bulk 1870-1920) 7 boxes, 44 volumes, 3 flat files, 6.9 lin. feet Contact: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania 1300 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107 Phone: (215) 732-6200 FAX: (215) 732-2680 http://www.hsp.org Processed by: Larissa Repin, Laura Ruttum & Joanne Danifo Processing Completed: September 2005 Sponsor: Phoebe W. Haas Charitable Trust Restrictions: None. Related Collections at See page 26 of the finding aid HSP: © 2005 The Historical Society of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved. Balch Family papers Collection 3058 Balch Family Papers, 1755-1963 (bulk 1870-1920) 7 boxes, 44 volumes, 3 flat files, 6.9 lin. feet Collection 3058 Abstract Thomas Balch (1821-1877) was born in Leesburg, Virginia to Lewis Penn Witherspoon Balch and Elizabeth Willis Weaver. He attended Columbia University and moved to Philadelphia, where he was admitted to the bar in 1850. In 1852, he married Emily Swift (1835-1917) and together they had three children: Elise Willing Balch (1853-1913), Edwin Swift Balch (1856-1927), and Thomas Willing Balch (1866-1927). The Balch family resided in Europe from 1859 to 1873 during which time Thomas (d. 1877) conducted research for several of the books and articles he wrote. His two most notable works are Les Francais en Amérique Pendant le Guerre de l’Indépendence, which explores France’s role in the American Revolution, and International Courts of Arbitration, which was written in aftermath of the sinking of the Alabama during the Civil War. Thomas Balch passed away in 1887 in Philadelphia. His sons Edwin Swift (d.
    [Show full text]
  • 400-36 S 3RD ST, AKA 301-17 LOMBARD ST Proposal: Construct Parish Hall Review Requested: Final Approval Owner: St
    ADDRESS: 400-36 S 3RD ST, AKA 301-17 LOMBARD ST Proposal: Construct parish hall Review Requested: Final Approval Owner: St. Peter's Church Applicant: David Ade, SMP Architects History: 1758; St. Peter's Church and Yard Individual Designation: 4/30/1957 District Designation: Society Hill Historic District, Significant, 3/10/1999 Staff Contact: Laura DiPasquale, [email protected] BACKGROUND: The property in question, 400-36 S. 3rd Street, is a large parcel that occupies much of the block bounded by Pine, S. 3rd, Lombard, and S. 4th Streets. St. Peter’s Church stands at the northeast corner of the site. St. Peter’s Cemetery occupies much of the northern half of the site. The southwest corner of the site, a surface parking lot, is being subdivided from 400-36 S. 3rd Street as 301-17 Lombard Street. St. Peter’s Church proposes to build a parish hall on the site. The overall property, 400-36 S. 3rd Street, was individually designated in 1957 and was included in the Society Hill Historic District as a Significant resource in 1999. Although part of the larger tax parcel at 400-36 S. 3rd Street at the time of designation, the surface parking lot at 301-17 Lombard Street is separately classified as Contributing for its archaeological potential, but not for any aboveground resources. The Historical Commission reviewed and approved a design for the parish hall in 2019, with the requirement that the property owner conduct an archaeological investigation. Since that time, the archaeological investigation has been completed and a new architect has taken over and revised the design of the parish hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin's Bench and Bar of Philadelphia
    MARTIN'S BENCH AND BAR OF PHILADELPHIA Together with other Lists of persons appointed to Administer the Laws in the City and County of Philadelphia, and the Province and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania BY , JOHN HILL MARTIN OF THE PHILADELPHIA BAR OF C PHILADELPHIA KKKS WELSH & CO., PUBLISHERS No. 19 South Ninth Street 1883 Entered according to the Act of Congress, On the 12th day of March, in the year 1883, BY JOHN HILL MARTIN, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. W. H. PILE, PRINTER, No. 422 Walnut Street, Philadelphia. Stack Annex 5 PREFACE. IT has been no part of my intention in compiling these lists entitled "The Bench and Bar of Philadelphia," to give a history of the organization of the Courts, but merely names of Judges, with dates of their commissions; Lawyers and dates of their ad- mission, and lists of other persons connected with the administra- tion of the Laws in this City and County, and in the Province and Commonwealth. Some necessary information and notes have been added to a few of the lists. And in addition it may not be out of place here to state that Courts of Justice, in what is now the Com- monwealth of Pennsylvania, were first established by the Swedes, in 1642, at New Gottenburg, nowTinicum, by Governor John Printz, who was instructed to decide all controversies according to the laws, customs and usages of Sweden. What Courts he established and what the modes of procedure therein, can only be conjectur- ed by what subsequently occurred, and by the record of Upland Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Willing Powel
    A Self-Guided Tour ELIZABETH WILLING POWEL James Kopaczewski Temple University Map of the Powel House: First Floor Second Floor 2 Tour Introduction: “contrary to American custom, [Mrs. Powel] plays the leading role in the family – la prima figura, as the Italians say…she has not traveled, but she has wit and a good memory, speaks well and talks a great deal” -Marquis de Chastellux, Travels in North America Throughout her life, Elizabeth Willing Powel (1743-1830) sustained a voluminous correspondence which included letters to colonial America’s first families. Elizabeth’s correspondence shows that she was not only literate but also highly intelligent and politically astute. By utilizing her words and visiting the rooms in which she wrote those words, this tour seeks to show that Elizabeth was a sophisticated and an exceptional woman. She was born and raised in privilege, married into one of Philadelphia’s wealthiest families, and had a grandfather, father, brother, and husband who all served as Mayor of Philadelphia at different points in the 1700s. Undoubtedly, Elizabeth had access to opportunities that many in colonial America could never access. While Elizabeth’s story cannot explain what life was like for ordinary men and women, her story nonetheless can illuminate what women in certain circumstances experienced. Indeed, the story of Elizabeth Willing Powel shows that some 18th century women were culturally powerful, economically savvy, politically active, and socially conscious. 1) “The Powel House and the Evolution of Society Hill” Location: The historic marker outside of the Powel House Instructions: Please exit the Powel House, stand near the historic marker on the front of the house, and examine your surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • D N OCTOBER 5, 1775, the Pennsylvania State House
    THE IMPACT OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ON THE GOVERNOR'S COUNCILLORS By JAMES LAVERNE ANDERSON* D NOCTOBER 5, 1775, the Pennsylvania State House was the scene of two important meetings. While the Second Continental Congress held a session downstairs, the Pennsylvania Governor's Council met in the second floor Council chamber. The Councillors discussed the election returns of the Pennsylvania counties. After certifying the results as official, the Governor s Council of Pennsylvania adjourned for what was to prove to be the last time.1 Presently, the advisory institution which had been a part of the Proprietorship for over ninety years alas no more. The Councillors of 1775 were the remaining elite of the Penn- sylvania Proprietorship. Serving as a Council, they had little power; but as holders of some fifty or more other positions, lead- ing members of the best social groups, and owviiers of land and businesses, their influence permeated the colony. In October, 1775, the Councillors faced a personal crisis as they A itnessed the rising tide of public feeling against the mother country, a tide which threatened to engulf those who represented the past. Despite the rise of this feeling within the Proprietorship, Pennsylvania was in a unique position. Of the thirteen colonies, only Pennsylvania and Maryland remained Proprietaries. But the political situation in Maryland was more antagonistic toward the Proprietary Council since the Council in that colony main- tained legislative power. The Maryland Councillors formed a court party" which supported the Crown, while the Assembly members constituted a "'countr) partyv which stimulated the *Mr. Anderson is a Thonmas Jefferson Fellow in the Graduate School of the University of Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbot, Ezra, 62 Abingdon, Lord, 287, 300 Abolition, Horace
    INDEX Abbot, Ezra, 62 American Ships of the Colonial & Revolu- Abingdon, Lord, 287, 300 tionary Periods, by Millar, rev., 532-534 Abolition, Horace Greeley's views on, 209 American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Abolitionists, in Phila., 370-371 449, 460 Academy of Music, Fenian lecture at, 217 American Theatre Company, 150 Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, American Unitarian Association, 53, 57 Amusements: fancy dress parties, 223, 224; Actors: favor Lecture on Heads, 166-176; in Phila. in 1839, 500; in 1840, 523-524 public repute of, 361 Andalusia, Biddle estate, 4, 28, 29 Adams, Donald R., Jr., Finance and Enter- Anderson, Richard Clough, 95 prise in Early America, rev., 129-131 Anderson, Maj. Robert, 185, 186, 187, 190 Adams, Henry, on Gilded Age, 334 Animal magnatism, 501 Adams, John (1735-1826), 358; death of, 99; Anthracite coal. See Coal trials of John Fries, 435-443 Arch Street Theatre, 524 Adams, John Quincy, 373; poem of in Anna Architecture: Nicholas Biddle's views on, 29; Breck's album, 107-108 in Phila., 380 Addison, Alexander, 436 Archives, of Pa., Dr. Shenk's missing series, Agriculture: Nicholas Biddle's observations 4I5-43I on, 17-18, 28; in Boston area, 520 Albion, loss of packet ship, 244 Archives Search Room, Harrisburg, 417 Albion, N. Y. newspaper, 503 Armstrong, Gen. John, Jr. (1758-1843), 3, Algiers, Dey of, 41, 42 4, 6 Allston, Washington, 15, 21 Arson, of Pa. Hall, 370-371 Almanacs, printed by Wm. Dunlap, 148 Ashton, Mr., actor, 175 Ambivalent Americans: The Know-Nothing Asparagus, m Party in America, by Baker, rev., 133-135 Aspinwall, Anna Lloyd Breck (Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Burd Family Papers
    Special Collections Department Burd Family Papers 1703 - 1937 (bulk dates 1800 - 1860) Manuscript Collection Number: 379 Accessioned: Gift of the Moyerman family, 1970. Extent: 3 linear ft. (1372 items) Content: Wills, deeds, estate records, correspondence, bills, receipts, funeral notices, legal documents, stock certificates, mortgages, account books, and ephemera. Access: The collection is open for research. Processed: September 1998 by Arthur Siegel for reference assistance email Special Collections or contact: Special Collections, University of Delaware Library Newark, Delaware 19717-5267 (302) 831-2229 Table of Contents Biographical Note Scope and Contents Note Series List Contents List Genealogical Tables Biographical Note The Burds were a distinguished family of Scottish origin, whose members were engaged in both the legal and military professions, and were also prominent landowners in Pennsylvania. Edward Shippen Burd's grandfather, Col. James Burd (1726-1793), was born near Edinburgh, Scotland, and settled on a farm in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, after his marriage in 1748 to Sarah Shippen, a member of the prominent Shippen family of Lancaster and Shippensburg. He joined the military as an officer at the outbreak of the French and Indian War, eventually earning the rank of colonel by 1758. From 1756-1757 he was in command of Fort Augustus, near Shamokin, Pennsylvania, and from 1764-1770 he held the office of Justice of Lancaster County. In 1774, a year before the outbreak of hostilities with Great Britain, Col. Burd was instrumental in garnering local support for the colonial congress in its opposition to the Crown, and by the following year was assisting in the military organization of Lancaster County as a member of the Committee of Safety.
    [Show full text]
  • "Philadelphia*S <J)(Cunicipal Corporation
    "Philadelphia*s <J)(Cunicipal Corporation, 1701-1776 URING the colonial period two American cities, New York and Philadelphia, were nominally governed by municipal D corporations closely resembling their English models, and displaying many of the same deficiencies but little of the vitality that still characterized some of their English counterparts. The Philadel- phia Corporation was a close one, entirely self-perpetuating. During its seventy-five-year existence (1701-1776), it became ever more closely bound to its own interests as a legal entity and thus more estranged from the interests of the inhabitants of Philadelphia. Under its charter, the Corporation received powers that were static and somewhat antiquated. As a consequence, the increasing size of the city and the complexity of urban life left the Corporation iso- lated, further and further out of touch with public opinion, while the actual government of Philadelphia went piecemeal into the hands of boards of commissioners, wardens, overseers, and the like. These derived their authority from the Pennsylvania Assembly rather than from the municipal charter.1 The Philadelphia Corporation played second fiddle to the pro- vincial government on every count. It suffered from the Assembly's presence in Philadelphia and from its tendency to interest itself in the details of the city government. E. S. Griffith, a historian of city government, has stated that this situation was common in the colonies: "In many instances, notably in the capital cities, the assembly appeared to regard itself as the actual government of the town, solemnly considering details which might more properly have been delegated—and which in fact in some instances had actually 1 The actual government of Philadelphia by these boards is a related study, one that has not as yet been done except in the general terms of Carl Bridenbaugh's two books, Cities in the Wilderness and Cities in Revolt.
    [Show full text]
  • When We Were Young: the American Philosophical Society in the 18Th Century1
    When We Were Young: The American Philosophical Society in the 18th Century1 GARY B. NASH Distinguished Research Professor University of California, Los Angeles n 2018 the American Philosophical Society celebrated its 275th anniversary, though in truth, 1743 is a shadowy date. Some think Ithe APS began in 1727, when Benjamin Franklin, at age 21—having resided in Philadelphia for less than two years since he first arrived in late 1723—convened his famous Junto of leather apron men (Figure 1). Drawing up rules for this private self-improvement group, 12 in number and limited to that size, he tasked “every Member in his Turn” to produce “one or more Queries . to be discuss’d by the Company.’’2 Among the founding group, four were from Samuel Keimer’s print shop (Franklin, Hugh Meredith, Stephen Potts, and George Webb) while the others were shoemakers (John Jones and William Parsons); a surveyor (Nicholas Scull); a scrivener (Joseph Breitnall); a carpenter (William Coleman); an ironmaker (Robert Grace); a glass maker (Thomas Godfrey); and a cabinet maker (William Mangrudge). It was a noble start, indeed an astounding venture, ushered into the world by such a youth striving to implant himself in a young river port, where Quaker merchants and landowners of growing wealth held sway.3 The APS website today claims our Society as an “offshoot” of 1 Read 26 April 2018. My thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions for this paper. 2 The editors of the comprehensive edition of the Papers of Benjamin Franklin aver that Franklin had been influenced by Boston’s venerable Cotton Mather’s Essays to Do Good (1710), which proposed voluntary groups to encourage morality and religion.
    [Show full text]