DOCSLIB.ORG

Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus Study (2013)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus Study (2013) Virginia Statewide Intercity Bus Study September 2013 Final Report prepared for Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation prepared by KFH Group, Inc. under subcontract to Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Intercity and Regional Bus Policy Context ...................................................... 1-1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1-1 Federal Policies ............................................................................................................. 1-2 Carrier Policies ............................................................................................................. 1-6 DRPT Policies on Intercity Services............................................................................ 1-9 Summary of the Policy Context .............................................................................. 1-11 Chapter 2: Inventory of Existing Intercity Bus Services ................................................................................................................... 2-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2-1 Overview of Intercity Bus Services............................................................................. 2-2 Curbside Services .......................................................................................................... 2-7 Long-Distance Commuter Bus Services .................................................................. 2-13 Frequency of Bus Service ........................................................................................... 2-15 Changes in Service ...................................................................................................... 2-16 Facilities ........................................................................................................................ 2-16 Summary and Conclusions ........................................................................................ 2-16 Chapter 3: Virginia Intercity Consultation Process ............................................................ 3-1 Consultation Process .................................................................................................... 3-1 Survey Results ............................................................................................................... 3-2 Need for Consultation Follow-Up .............................................................................. 3-4 Chapter 4: Intercity Bus Service Needs Analysis ................................................................ 4-1 Demographic Analysis of Intercity Bus Needs ......................................................... 4-1 Destinations and Facilities ......................................................................................... 4-10 Review of Local Plans Regarding Intercity Needs ................................................. 4-16 Candidate Stops .......................................................................................................... 4-22 Table of Contents Page Chapter 5: Potential Network ............................................................................................... 5-1 Potential Intercity Routes ............................................................................................ 5-1 Feasibility of Potential Routes .................................................................................... 5-4 Recommended Alternatives ....................................................................................... 5-7 Appendix A: Virginia Intercity Bus Schedules and Stop Locations ........................................................................................ A-1 Appendix B: Cities Losing Greyhound Service 2004-2005 ....................................................................................................... B-1 Attachment C: Consultation Process: Cover Letters and Surveys ....................................................................... C-1 Attachment D: Consultation Process: Survey Contact List .................................................................................. D-1 Attachment E: Consultation Process: Survey Results .......................................................................................... E-1 Attachment F: Key Destinations ............................................................................................ F-1 Chapter 1: Intercity and Regional Bus Policy Context Chapter 1 Intercity and Regional Bus Policy Context INTRODUCTION Under the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5311 program of assistance for rural public transportation, 15% of each state’s allocation is to be spent on rural intercity bus projects unless the state certifies that there are no unmet rural intercity needs. If a state so certifies then the 15% can be utilized to meet other rural transit needs. In Virginia, the Section 5311 program is administered by the Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT), historically DRPT has not utilized available FTA Section 5311(f) funding for rural intercity bus service; instead providing FTA with an annual certification when there were no applications for funding to meet intercity needs. However, changes in federal transit legislation now require states to conduct a consultation process prior to determining that there are no unmet rural intercity bus needs in the state, and this study is intended to be a significant part of Virginia’s consultation process. In addition, there have been other changes in the federal program that provide states with options for addressing the issue of the need for local match for operating projects, and these changes have been accompanied by changes in the services and policies of major private intercity bus carriers. Finally, there have been significant changes in the state’s overall transportation funding and transit program and this may allow for more flexibility to address intercity needs. All of these changes create a need for DRPT to address its rural intercity bus needs, and that is the rationale for conducting this study. This initial chapter particularly addresses the FTA programs, state participation, and carrier policies. Chapter 2 presents an overview of intercity bus services in Virginia. Chapter 3 presents a demographic analysis of the need for intercity services. Chapter 4 describes the input from the consultation process regarding Virginia’s intercity transit needs. Chapter 5 presents service and program alternatives, and Chapter 6 presents recommendations for DRPT. Virginia Statewide Intercity Final Report September 2013 Bus Study 1-1 Chapter 1: Intercity and Regional Bus Policy Context FEDERAL POLICIES Virginia’s policies regarding intercity bus transportation exist within the context of the federal policy structures that have evolved over the past several decades. On the regulatory side, these federal statutes have been specifically designed to pre-empt state policy regarding the economic regulation of intercity bus transportation. In general, the federal policy is that interstate bus transportation is not regulated at the federal level in terms of entry (which carriers can serve which routes), exit (whether a carrier is allowed to abandon a route), or rates (the federal government no longer oversees rates at all). Federal regulation is limited to ensuring that carriers are financially responsible (have adequate insurance) and meet federal safety standards. Because it is recognized that the federal policy of deregulation has reduced service coverage and frequency in rural areas, federal policy also provides for financial assistance for intercity bus service to, from, or in rural areas. Federal policy also recognizes that there are benefits to ensuring that travelers have the ability to make connections between modes, including intercity bus, local transit, and intercity rail passenger services. Federal funding is available for constructing intermodal passenger facilities, including the intercity bus related portions. The following section presents more detail on these policies. Federal Definition of Public Transportation Does Not Include Intercity Service The 2005 federal transportation program authorizing legislation--the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (known as SAFETEA-LU), included a change in the FTA definition of public transportation that affects the ability to use federal transit funds for intercity bus services, and this definition is included in the most recent authorization legislation, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). The language excludes intercity bus transportation from the definition of public transportation that is supported with federal funding In SAFETEA-LU there were three exceptions—the Section5311(f) rural intercity bus assistance program, intermodal facilities, and the S.3038 Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program. Under MAP-21 the Section 3038 program has been eliminated, so there are now only the two exceptions for which federal funding can be used for intercity bus services. This means that public transit agencies that receive FTA funding cannot operate intercity bus service between urbanized areas—this is a market reserved to the private for-profit industry. The two types of intercity assistance that are allowed include the following programs. Federal Transit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Naylor Road Metro Station Area Accessibility Study
    Naylor Road Metro Station Area Accessibility Study Pedestrian and Bicycle Metro Station Access Transportation Land-Use Connection (TLC) National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission May 2011 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Study Process ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Planning Context and Past Studies ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Conditions and Challenges ............................................................................................................. 10 Public Outreach .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator Transportation Commission
    Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator Transportation Commission July 01, 2021 Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator • BACKGROUND: The Pentagon City Metrorail station is one of the highest in terms of ridership among stations in Northern Virginia,. • Provides access to multiple retail, government, and commercial office buildings, and is a transfer point for regional and local transit buses and numerous private bus services. • Construction of a new second elevator Intersection of S Hayes and S 12th Streets on the north side of the passageway corresponds to the new second New Elevator Existing elevator being in the general area of Elevator the pedestrian path for people crossing S. Hayes Street. July 01, 2021 Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator Project Scope: • The second elevator will eliminate the need to cross six (6) lanes of traffic, two parking lanes, and a bike lane to reach the elevator on the east side of S. Hayes Street. • Improves ADA access and access for passengers with strollers and luggage. • Provide redundancy, in accordance with current WMATA design criteria, when one of the elevators is out of service for any reason. July 01, 2021 Pentagon City Metro Station Second Elevator Construction Phase: On January 25, 2021, Arlington County received two (2) bids • The low bidder, W.M. Schlosser Company, Inc. was awarded the contract on April 19, 2021 for $6.4 mil. • The County and Procon (CM), will work together with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) to ensure construction is performed
    [Show full text]
  • DC City Guide
    DC City Guide Page | 1 Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States and the seat of its three branches of government, has a collection of free, public museums unparalleled in size and scope throughout the history of mankind, and the lion's share of the nation's most treasured monuments and memorials. The vistas on the National Mall between the Capitol, Washington Monument, White House, and Lincoln Memorial are famous throughout the world as icons of the world's wealthiest and most powerful nation. Beyond the Mall, D.C. has in the past two decades shed its old reputation as a city both boring and dangerous, with shopping, dining, and nightlife befitting a world-class metropolis. Travelers will find the city new, exciting, and decidedly cosmopolitan and international. Districts Virtually all of D.C.'s tourists flock to the Mall—a two-mile long, beautiful stretch of parkland that holds many of the city's monuments and Smithsonian museums—but the city itself is a vibrant metropolis that often has little to do with monuments, politics, or white, neoclassical buildings. The Smithsonian is a "can't miss," but don't trick yourself—you haven't really been to D.C. until you've been out and about the city. Page | 2 Downtown (The National Mall, East End, West End, Waterfront) The center of it all: The National Mall, D.C.'s main theater district, Smithsonian and non- Smithsonian museums galore, fine dining, Chinatown, the Verizon Center, the Convention Center, the central business district, the White House, West Potomac Park, the Kennedy Center, George Washington University, the beautiful Tidal Basin, and the new Nationals Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Government Volume 2 December Published Monthly by the Institute of Government * Number 2 1934
    IN THIS ISSUE •4- ELECTIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA By Mojor L. P. McLendon Everybody Wants THE HIGHWAY FUND By Henry Brandis, Jr. TRAFFIC SAFETY IN GREENSBORO By George C. Eichhorn STATE TAXES COME AND GO By T N. Grice EDENTON'S BEAUTIFUL COURTHOUSE (Our Cover Picture) By Richard Dillard Dixon STATE DEPARTMENT RULINGS OF INTEREST TO OFFICIALS AND LAWYERS THE INSTITUTE ^>|^ ^GOVERNMENT '^j POPULAR. GOVERNMENT "^ :• ?:!. i^; ^ M Political for North Carolina THE Sm WALTER IS NOW A EOBEET MEYEE EIOTEL ''A Worthy Member of a Distinguished Group" Since assuming the management of the Sir Walter, the Robert Meyer interests have been spending thousands of dollars to renovate this famous hotel. Nothing has been spared to make the Sir Walter one of the finest hotels in the South. By January 1, renovation of all public space will be completed, and you will be delighted at the improved appearance of the lobby, the entrances, dining rooms, elevators and corridors. Every room will have new inner spring mattresses before the first of the year. You will be surprised at the many new fea- tures at the Sir Walter. The Sir Walter Eoland A. Mtimf ord^ Manager Ealeigh, N. C. Other Robert Meyer Hotels "HE Y THEfARRAGUT MAXWELL HOUSE Knoxville, Tenn. Nashville, Tenn. T- .ilTAGE THE WINECOFF THE WINDSOR Tenn. Atlanta, Go. Jacksonville, Fla. THE r.. ,4 LINCOLN THE RUSSELL ERSKINE THE STACY-TRENT Reoding, Pa. Huntsville, Ala. Trenton, N. J. POPULAR GOVERNMENT VOLUME 2 DECEMBER PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY THE INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT * NUMBER 2 1934 Elections in North Carolina Some Suggested Changes in the Election Laws THIS address was delivered by Major McLendon at the 1934 session of The Institute of Govern- ment held Thursday evening, November 15, at the Wake County Courthouse in Raleigh.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Toward Metro Stations: the Contribution of Distance, Attitudes, and Perceived Built Environment
    sustainability Article Walking toward Metro Stations: the Contribution of Distance, Attitudes, and Perceived Built Environment Mohammad Paydar 1,* , Asal Kamani Fard 2 and Mohammad Mehdi Khaghani 3 1 Escuela de Arquitectura Temuco, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Mayor, Av. Alemania 281, Temuco 4780000, Chile 2 Academic Researcher, Universidad Católica del Maule, San Miguel 3605, Talca, Chile; [email protected] 3 Department of Urban Studies, Apadana Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz 7187985443, Iran; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 September 2020; Accepted: 16 November 2020; Published: 9 December 2020 Abstract: Walking as an active means of travel is important as a sustainable mode of transport. Moreover, the level of walking in the surrounding areas of metro stations would contribute to maintaining the minimum rate of physical activity and, therefore, inhabitants’ general health. This study examined the impacts of walking attitude, walking distance, and perceived built environment on walking behavior for reaching the metro stations in Shiraz, Iran. Three metro stations were selected and a quantitative approach was used to examine the objectives. It was found that the average walking distance is less than the average in developed countries, such as the United States. People walked more when there was a shorter distance between their starting points and the metro stations. The contribution of walking attitudes and several built environment attributes to walking behavior was demonstrated. Finding the contribution of aesthetic attributes, such as accessibility to parks and housing types of the starting points of the walking trips, to walking for transport are taken into account as the novelties of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING GUIDE for Public Transportation Elevators Table of Contents
    PLANNING GUIDE FOR Public transportation elevators Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................4 1.1 About this Planning Guide ............................................................................................4 1.2 About KONE .................................................................................................................4 2. Special demands of public transportation ........................................................... 7 2.1 Airports ........................................................................................................................7 2.1.1 Benefits of KONE elevators for airports ...................................................................................... 7 2.2 Transit centers (railway and metro ststions) ...................................................................8 2.2.1 Benefits of KONE elevators in railway and metro stations .......................................................... 8 2.3 Main specifications for public transportation elevators ...............................................10 2.4 Electromagnetic compatibility standards ....................................................................11 2.5 LSH and LH cables ......................................................................................................11 3. Odering a public transportation elevator ...........................................................12 3.1 Key cost drivers for elevators in
    [Show full text]
  • Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011
    Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011 Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning August 2011 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning Jim Hamre, Director of Bus Planning Krys Ochia, Branch Manager 600 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Parsons Brinckerhoff Brian Laverty, AICP, Project Manager Nicholas Schmidt, Task Manager 1401 K Street NW, Suite 701 Washington, DC 20005 Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Existing Conditions ES-1 Policies and Procedures ES-2 Future Demand ES-3 Recommendations ES-4 Introduction 1 Study Process 3 Coordination 3 On-Site Observations 3 Operating Issues 3 Future Demand 4 Permitting and Enforcement 4 Existing Conditions 7 Key Observations 8 Operating Issues 9 Policies and Procedures 17 Permitting 17 Enforcement 19 Future Demand 25 Methodology 25 Results 28 Recommendations 33 Facility Design 34 Demand Management 37 Permitting 39 Enforcement 42 Contents | i Figures Figure ES-1: Future Shuttle Demand Estimate ES-4 Figure 1: Location of Peer U.S. Transit Agencies 4 Figure 2: Study Stations 7 Figure 3: Vehicles in Tight Turning Areas May Block Bus Bay Entrances (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 4: Long Kiss & Ride Queue (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 5: Pedestrian Shortcut (Southern Avenue Station) 11 Figure 6: Shuttle Blocking Kiss & Ride Travel Lane (King Street Station) 12 Figure 7: Shuttle Blocking Bus Stop (Anacostia Station) 13 Figure 8: Typical Signs Prohibiting Non-Authorized Access to Station Bus Bays
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    SUNDAY, JULY 1, 2018 . THE WASHINGTON POST EZ EE F5 The deals on the bus BY MEGAN MCDONOUGH The 227-mile ride from the District to New York City can sometimes resemble a game of duck, duck, goose. But instead of waterfowl, travelers count vehicles: car, car, bus. Car, car, bus. The much-maligned workhorses of mass transport have made a resurgence in the last decade and, in response, the number of carriers has surged, with companies adding more creature comforts, departure times and rewards programs to encourage loyalty. ¶ And while they all look nearly identical from the outside — flashy signage excepted — no two bus operators are the same. Their ticket prices, points of departure, amenities and scheduling can vary widely. And those distinctions matter, especially as you’re entering Hour 3. ¶ Overwhelmed by the options? Here’s a quick comparison of 11 budget bus lines that offer service between the two cities. PHOTOS BY CALLA KESSLER/THE WASHINGTON POST CARRIER D.C. STOPS NYC STOPS PRICE BOOKING POLICIES AMENITIES REWARDS PROGRAM BEST FOR Riders can stream free shows and Bargain travelers who like to 11th Avenue and movies on their personal devices via book in advance. To score one Book online, by phone or pay cash curbside West 36th Street, bus WiFi. (Current selections include of the company’s coveted ($25 for walk-ups). No refunds. but you can near the Javits “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” and “Get Out.”) cheap seats ($3, with fees), BoltBus $13-$40. rebook up to 24 hours before departure for Free. Members receive a free Dupont Circle; Center; Sixth The company’s BusTracker system reserve your seat several 877-265-8287 Sometimes, it $5, plus any fare differential.
    [Show full text]
  • HB-Music-Auction-Catalog 2017V4
    H-B Woodlawn Schedule Welcome! Below is our schedule for tonight’s dining, entertainment and auction. Please note when categories Welcome to the H-B Woodlawn Jazz Feast, Silent Auction and Spaghetti Dinner close and their corresponding colors: to benefit our wonderful Music Department Time Event Auction Category Closing Special Thanks: Auction Emcee Reid Goldstein, APS School Board member and to HB student Cole Goco for the original cover and poster art. 6:00 Doors open, Check In Bidding Begins - Gym 6:30 Spaghetti Dinner Begins- Cafeteria THANK YOU TO ALL OF OUR VOLUNTEERS!: 6:30 Performances by HBW Jazz Band & Singer Songwriters - Cafeteria Auction Chairs Janet Dorn, Terri Ferinde, Robb Tanner 8:00 Performance by the Middle School Chorus - Seasons of Love from Rent - Gym Rock Stars Parresh McMahon, Vanessa Piccorossi 8:00 Spaghetti Dinner ends Donations Countless Dedicated Volunteers 8:15 Cool Stuff (Pink Tables) Catalog Joshua Stearns, Robb Tanner, Terri Ferinde 8:15 Improve Yourself (Green Tables) Spaghetti Dinner Theo Moll 8:20 Performance by the HBW String Orchestra - Skyfall - Gym Publicity Margaret Staeben 8:30 Food & Drink (Red Tables) Music Faculty Risa Browder, Carl Holmquist, Bill Podolski 8:30 Dessert is served - Cafeteria 8:35 Performance by the HBW Basso Concert Choir - Johnny Schmocker - Gym Auction Rules 8:45 Music & Theater (Orange Tables) 8:45 Experiences (Blue Tables) So that everyone’s auction experience is fair, organized and 8:50 Performance by the HBW Jazz Band & Chamber Singers - Let’s Do It by Cole Porter - Gym enjoyable, please pay attention to these important rules. 9:00 HB Exclusives (Purple Tables) X Upon arrival, please register, receive your bid number and write your bid number on your catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Real Estate Market Review
    retail 2015 hampton roads real estate market review Author David Machupa Cushman & Wakefield | THALHIMER Survey Collection Luisa Lucero E.V. Williams Center for Real Estate and Economic Development Old Dominion University Data Analysis/ David Chapman, Ph.D. Layout Old Dominion University Financial The E. V. Williams Center for Real Estate and Economic Support Development (CREED) functions and reports are funded by donations from the CREED membership, organizations, and individuals. Disclosure The data used for this report are deemed reliable; however, neither Old Dominion University, the E. V. Williams Center for Real Estate and Economic Development, nor sponsoring companies and/or individuals make any representation or warranty as to its accuracy. 2015 retail 13 2015 retail d e f i N i T i o ns o f T e rms Asking Rates: The market rate per square foot of a retail property (excluding freestanding buildings and malls), exclusive of additional rents that may be paid under a triple net lease. Interpretation of average retail rates in General Overview different product types and submarkets should be viewed cautiously given the tremendous variability in rates for like products and for properties located within the same submarket. Factors such as visibility, co-tenancy, and accessibility, are some of the many sources of variation in market rates which should be considered. his report analyzes the 2014 retail real estate conditions Big Boxes: Contiguous retail space that is at least 23,000 square feet and located in any one of the identified within the Virginia Beach-Norfolk- product types. Retailers occupying big boxes include, but are not limited to, the following: category killers, specialty Newport News, Virginia Metropol- stores, discounters, furniture stores, grocery stores and theaters.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are America's Travel Industry, A
    The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker of the House of Representatives United States Senate United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Charles Schumer The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Minority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 March 20, 2020 Dear Leader McConnell, Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy: We are America’s travel industry, an economic sector that directly employs 9 million American workers and supports a total of 15.8 million jobs. The travel and tourism industry—including but not limited to transportation, lodging, recreation and entertainment, food and beverage, meetings, conferences and business events, travel advisors, destination marketers—is comprised of businesses of all sizes, but the vast majority, 83%, are small businesses. Together we are grappling with the immediate and devastating impact of the current health crisis. Furloughs of American travel workers are happening right now. Travel to and within the United States has essentially ground to a stop due to the actions needed to halt the spread of coronavirus. Aggressive financial relief is needed immediately. Taking care of our employees will always be our top priority, but the hard fact is we cannot continue supporting them through this disaster without relief. To that end, we greatly appreciate and strongly support provisions in the ‘‘Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act’’ that provide: • $300 billion for enhanced Small Business Administration (SBA) loans distributed through an expedited process and can be partially forgiven for employee retention; and • Tax relief to mitigate economic losses, including deferral of tax liability, extension of the Net Operating Loss deduction, and delay of estimated tax payments.
    [Show full text]
  • 01-14 CRMHA Newsletter
    CENTRAL CROSSINGS Monthly Newsletter of the e Central Railway Model & Historical Association, Inc. Volume 24, Issue 1 January 2014 Florida Photo-Fest 108 Werner St Photos by Ralph Watson Central, SC 29627 Ralph Watson took a little trip to Florida in November and sent pictures of an operating layout in the Gulf Coast Model Railroad Hobby Shop in Sarasota as Website: well as some photos of the Florida Railroad Museum in Parrish. www.crmha.org President Dan Marrett Vice Presidents Joe Fitzpatrick Rob Seel, AIA Stationmaster Ralph Watson Paymaster [Ed. Note: These are the biggest mountains I have ever heard of in Florida] Christine Grewcock Curator Jack Green Newsletter J.T. Thorpe Next Meeting Jan. 2, 2014 7:10 PM at the Central Railway Museum Approach Signals SCHEDULED EVENTS & SHOWS January 18, 2014 Atlanta, GA – 46 th Atlanta Model Train Show North Atlanta Trade Center, 1700 Jeurgens Court. Upcoming Events for the Times: Saturday 9am-4pm Admission: Adults: $7 Children under 12: Free Central Railway Model & Historical w/adult Association [email protected] as well as regional shows and events worth mentioning January 25, 2014 Columbia, SC – Columbia South Carolina PROGRAM SCHEDULE Model Train Show SC State Fairgrounds, Rosewood Bldg., 1200 January 2: TBD Rosewood Drive Times: 9:30am-3:30pm The rest of 2014 is Wide Open Admission: Adults: $6, Children under 12: Free, Scouts in uniform: Free www.knightshows.org nd 2 SATURDAY MUSEUM OPEN TO THE PUBLIC January 11, 2014 FEBRUARY 1 --- 222,2, 2, 20142 014 February 11, 2014 EASLEY, SCSCSC OPERATING SESSIONS Second Thursdays (usually) 7PM OUR January 9, 2014 SHOW February 9, 2014 The CRM&HA has begun regular operating February 1-2, 2014 sessions on the Thursday preceding our Easley, SC – CRM&HA 2014 Annual Train Museum’s open house each month.
    [Show full text]