DOCSLIB.ORG

Post-Print Version) of the Article

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Post-Print Version) of the Article This is the accepted manuscript (post-print version) of the article. As regards to content, the post- print version is identical to the final published version, but there may be differences in typography, layout, and copy editing. Please cite the published version: Liebst, Lasse Suonperä and Sam Griffiths. 2019. Space syntax theory and Durkheim’s social morphology: a reassessment. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2019.1641121 Space syntax theory and Durkheim’s social morphology: a reassessment Lasse Suonperä Liebst and Sam Griffiths Abstract In outlining their influential architectural theory of space syntax, Hillier and Hanson acknowledge its affinity to Durkheim’s classical sociology, including his social morphological considerations on the spatial basis of social life. In doing so, space syntax theory promised to address the then woefully under-theorised relationship between society and space, specifically by emphasising the agency of spatial-morphological arrangements. Given the Durkheimian inspiration, it is surprising that sociology has been so silent on the subject of space syntax theory. This lack of dialogue may be explained by the gestation of space syntax research within the specialist disciplinary silo of architectural theory, as well as by the default sociological assessment that formal methodologies of spatial analysis, such as those associated with space syntax, sustain a discredited fallacy of physical determinism. Yet, intellectually this situation is unfortunate: while sociology overlooks how space syntax theory has advanced the Durkheimian understanding of spatial morphologies, space syntax theory misses an opportunity to update and broaden its notion of social processes. In response, this article revisits Durkheim’s social morphology and reviews the analytical strengths and deficits of Hillier and Hanson’s consideration of Durkheimian theory. We identify how difficulties arise because of an over-reliance of space syntax theory on the structural functionalist macro-wing of the Durkheimain tradition. To address this issue, we prepare the ground for a theoretical engagement between space syntax and the micro-sociological branch of the Durkheiminan scholarship, and show how this tradition offers a more coherent means for translating the spatio-morphological insights of space syntax theory into contemporary debates in the sociology of space. 1 Introduction Space is on the sociological research agenda. It is currently argued that social theory is turning towards a wider appreciation of space (Warf and Arias 2008), implying that spatiality should be regarded a novel aspect of sociological inquiry (Latour 1996, Latour and Yaneva 2008). As highlighted by Tonboe (1993), however, it is misleading to regard space as a “new” sociological dimension. It would be more accurate to say that the spatial dimension has been “lost and found” repeatedly across the sociological tradition, as reflected in the circumstance that the sociological classics previously conceptualised societal processes in the context of space. The tendency to neglect these early contributions is symptomatic for the field of the sociology of space, and this is arguably most conspicuous with regard to one of the founding fathers of French sociology, Émile Durkheim, whose notion of social morphology asserted a role for space in the very heart of sociological inquiry (Tonboe 1993; Liebst 2016; Lindemann 2011). This neglect translates further, as suggested by Smith (1999), into an under-utilisation of the space theoretical contributions found within the Durkheimian tradition, including the work of Mary Douglas (1970), Levi-Strauss (1974), and Victor Turner (1977). With remarkably few exceptions, it is thus outside mainstream sociology that we find a contemporary contribution that fully acknowledges and Durkheim’s theorising on space. The analytical architecture theory of space syntax – paradigmatically set out in Hillier and Hanson’s (1984) The Social Logic of Space – incorporates key elements of Durkheim’s sociology into its theoretical foundations. Durkheim is also referenced time and again, both in the formative publications leading up to this book (e.g. Hanson 1976; Hillier et al. 1976; 1978) and in the numerous theoretical contributions that followed (e.g. Hillier et al. 1987; Hillier 1989; Hiller and Netto 2002; Hillier 2008; Hillier 2010; Hanson 2012). The space syntax-Durkheim link also manifests itself in the circustance that when other sociological scholars are referenced by Hillier and Hanson, the overwhelming majority are placed within a Durkheimian space-theoretical paradigm. Given this record of engagement, there is a strong – if perhaps somewhat unexpected – case to be made that the space syntax tradition provides one of the most significant elaborations of Durkheim’s social morphological theory on offer to contemporary sociologists. Most sociologists will be unfamiliar with the field of space syntax that emerged in the Bartlett School of Architecture at University College London (UCL) during the 1970s, and which continues to host the Space Syntax Laboratory. The research field now forms a global community, with nodes 2 established in schools of architecture and built environment worldwide.1 While space syntax provides a useful nexus for interdisciplinary research in built environment its disciplinary positioning is firmly in architecture, where a large number of practising architects – including leading figures such as Norman Foster (1997) – employ space syntax methods as a tool in the design process. Many of these practical applications are, as we shall see below, looking to model the effect of architectural and urban space on human movement. Space syntax initially arose in response to what its pioneers, most notably Bill Hillier, regarded as the inadequate theorisation of the human-made environment – a situation they believed presented a serious impediment to articulating architectural design knowledge as an autonomous knowledge domain. The need for such an articulation was part of a general response to the perceived crisis of architectural modernism in the late 1960s, as many of the more utopian aspirations for architecture in the post-war era (for example in the design of housing estates and new towns) became increasingly identified with social dysfunction. For Hillier, as for many other architectural thinkers of this era, this crisis suggested a need to rethink the nature of the relationship between architecture and society. In a series of papers in the early 1970s, Hillier and colleagues drew heavily on systems theory and mathematical logic from the emerging field of computer science to question prevailing mechanistic and idealist theories of the human environment in architectural design (Hillier and Leaman 1973a; 1974). Conventionally, this was conceived in terms of direct physicalist determinants, or in socio-psychological terms as a cognitive image of a social totality (Hillier and Leaman 1973b). These simplifications, Hillier argued, elided the distinguishing quality of architectural design that also defined its disciplinary autonomy, namely addressing the relation of form and function in the spatial-morphological environment where social life actually takes place. While the engagement of space syntax with sociological and Durkheimian scholarship is extensive, sociology on the other hand, offers only few scattered remarks on space syntax (e.g. Löw 2008). These are often rather parenthetical and delivered in a rather dismissive tone, typically expressing distrust for its deployment of formal, analytical methods and certainly without acknowledging the Durkhiemian contribution (e.g. Saunders 2003; Soja 2001). This scepticism may be traced back to an assertion that the space syntax approach commits the same “fallacy of physical determinism”, which Gans (1968) famously identified in Jacobs’ (1961) architectural thought. Thus, while sociological theories of space tend to “approach the society–environment relation ‘society 1 The Proceedings of the International Space Syntax Symposia, held bianually since 1997, are available on open access and offer a good overview of the community’s diverse research interests and activities, see spacesyntax.net. 3 first’, in that the form of the environment is sought as the product of the spatial dimensions of social processes”, the idea of space syntax theory is, as Hillier (2008, p. 1) puts it, “to turn the question the other way round and through ‘environment first’ studies look for evidence of social processes in the spatial forms of the built environment”. For most sociologists, this architectural ambition to study the “real space” of built morphologies reflects an “absolutist” understanding of spatiality, which Löw’s (2016) recent contribution has criticised for naively assuming that space exists independently of social action. Sociologists are overall, as summarised by Logan (2012, p. 507), “less interested in spatial patterns in themselves, and more interested in how they translate into social relations.” Yet, as humans are discretely situated individuals in the material world (Turner 2010), there is a need to theorise how our spatio-morphological arrangements enables the construction of social relations across space; a question with clear Durkheimian resonances. In this spirit, the current article proceeds to take some initial steps to establish space syntax as an important Durkheimian morphological contribution, highlighting the productive role of society’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download This PDF File
    Cover’s comment No stars When artists draw on materials and techniques from an area such as science, they must be able to keep free from demonstration and verification. It is to be good at having a lyrical approach, imagining “the Earth is still flat" and considering sci- ence and technology as mysterious and fantastic tools. In the proposed image, a model of the tetrahedron designed by the Canadian scientist and inventor Alexander Graham Bell as a module for the gliders is al- tered. The change is made by the torsion of a plane surface, through developing formal ambiguity, thus depriving the object of its aerodynamic function. The model was then made available to a group of people with whom the artist opened a dialogue. Hence a spontaneous conversation was triggered about the nature of the object itself, from which it turned out a kaleidoscope of assump- tions, definitions, visual projections, constituting the series "No stars". Some stretches of the dialogue: "There are surfaces to which you can adhere in a metaphorical sense"; "The rotate plane is a lever that multiplies these surfaces toward infinity"; "Ironic instruments punctuate the experience"; "I can still imagine the earth as flat". Reflection concerns the inevitable sophistication produced by the attempt to define a form. And this sophistication is a "problem" we have in common. In fact a strong ambiguity is always encountered when it is sought to define an object, for the object is not merely placed in a space, but is itself a space. By de-contextualizing the object we have a first difference of meaning and by altering it we have a second one.
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetic Space: the Visible and the Invisible in Urban Agency
    Aesthetic Space: The Visible and the Invisible in Urban Agency THÈSE NO 6445 (2017) PRÉSENTÉE LE 16 MAI 2017 À LA FACULTÉ DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT NATUREL, ARCHITECTURAL ET CONSTRUIT LABORATOIRE CHÔROS PROGRAMME DOCTORAL EN ARCHITECTURE ET SCIENCES DE LA VILLE ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE POUR L'OBTENTION DU GRADE DE DOCTEUR ÈS SCIENCES PAR Mirza TURSIĆ acceptée sur proposition du jury: Prof. B. Marchand, président du jury Prof. J. Lévy, directeur de thèse Prof. M. Jakob, rapporteur Prof. L. Matthey, rapporteur Dr L. Pattaroni, rapporteur Suisse 2017 Acknowledgements First, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Prof. Jacques Lévy for his continuous support, motivation and thoroughness. His incisiveness and intellectual acuity were fundamental throughout the research and writing phases of this thesis. I thank him for teaching me that one should not find their way, but invent it. Additional thanks go to Prof. Bruno Marchand, Prof. Michael Jakob, Prof. Laurent Matthey and Dr. Luca Pattaroni for their participation on my thesis committee. Their feedback and ideas remain an invaluable inspiration for my future scientific activities. My sincere thanks also go to Prof. Ognjenka Finci, Prof. Lemja Chabbouh Akšamija and Prof. Adnan Pašić for their crucial support at the very beginning of my academic odyssee. I recognize that this research would not have been possible without the Swiss government, from which I received a three-year excellence scholarship through the Federal Commission for Scholarships for Foreign Students (FCS). I am particularly grateful to Karin Delavy-Juillerat and Nathalie Miazza for their unfailing support from my very first day at the EPFL.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Spatial Approach Or the New Urban Sociology the Lecture
    Objectives_template Module 3: Theories of Urban Sociology Lecture 22: Socio-spatial Approach or the New Urban Sociology The Lecture Contains: Henri Lefebvre The ctiy and the 'genaeral law of capitalist accumulation'. Circuits of capital. 'Abstract and Social space' David Harvey Second Circuit of Capital and other social factors A global view of metropolitan development References file:///D|/NPTL%20WORK/Dr.%20Anindita%20Chakrabarti/UrbanSociology/lecture22/22_1.htm [5/31/2013 10:37:34 AM] Objectives_template Module 3: Theories of Urban Sociology Lecture 22: Socio-spatial Approach or the New Urban Sociology The concept of uneven development, as developed by Karl Marx, has been applied by the theorists of the socio- spatial school in order to explain the city building process. According to Marx, a major contradiction of capitalism lies in the simultaneous emergence of concentrations of wealth and capital, on one hand, and poverty and dispossession, on the other. This ‘general law of capitalist accumulation’ as Marx termed it, highlights the capital-labour conflict. It was in the 1970s that the Marxian tradition was revived in urban sociology. In this lecture we will discuss the socio-spatial approach as developed in the works of Henri Lefebvre and David Harvey. From this perspective the capitalist mode of production was based on a spatial dynamic. Urban analysis was influenced by the work of Henri Lefebvre for whom the unevenness in accumulation and ownership is expressed spatially in terms of inequalities in the residential pattern and in the provision of urban services. Lefebvre dealt with the organization of space as a material product, delineating the relationship between social and spatial structures of urbanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Simmel's Spatial Sociology and Tutoring Centers As Cultural Spaces
    Georg Simmel’s Spatial Sociology and Tutoring Centers as Cultural Spaces JOSEPH CUNNINGHAM University of Cinncinati Abstract Student culture carries a variety of benefits for the student population, including better social integration and stronger academic performance. At a two-year commuter college, however, student culture is far more difficult to construct due to the travelling distance as well as the lack of conducive space for its generation. The sociology of spaces, as written about by German sociologist, Georg Simmel, provides four crucial characteristics of space, and these features can be appropriated by tutoring centers in order to serve as one of the few spaces at the commuter college where student culture can flourish. Introduction ulture is such a ubiquitous concept that we often take it for granted. More significantly, there is a tendency to takethe generation of culture for Cgranted as if culture produces itself or the production of culture is beyond our control. Ultimately, the construction of culture (or lack thereof) is within the hands of people interacting in a shared space, and in the case of student culture, students, staff, and faculty members all contribute to its creation. However, in many institutions—in particular two-year commuter colleges—student culture can be compromised by a lack of conducive spaces. This unfortunate reality has serious academic and emotional consequences for many students, including those of poor academic performance and increased student alienation. With its emphasis on community, student ownership, and collaborative academics, college tutoring centers serve as pivotal spaces where student culture can flourish. Moreover, many of these centers reflect a sociology of space that was written about by esteemed German sociologist, Georg Simmel.
    [Show full text]
  • Topology of the Other: Boundaries As a Means of Space Cosmisation
    Topology of the Other: Boundaries as a Means of Space Cosmisation Marina Kolinko1 Ph.D., Associated Professor, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University (Vinnytsia, Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1043-2742 The article presents a philosophical reflection of the Other within the context of space “cosmisation”. The topological methodology suggests the analysis of semantic structures in spatial relation of subjects and their environment. It also assigns the cartography of differentiation relationships inside the humankind and in humankind’s search of its own place in the space universe. There have been found algorithms for the topology of relations with the Other in anthropological and cultural aspects. The authors have highlighted the importance of searching for algorithms of communicative and diplomatic protocols of the interaction of the humankind with the principally Other (animal, artificial, space worlds). An analytical instrument for distinguishing the specific forms of interaction became an abstract Alien by Georg Simmel. The Other articulates the relations of distance: it does not go ahead, but it does not fully overpower the freedom of coming and going. The paper proves the necessity of marginality of the Other for activating and renewing the relationships inside the homeworld and relationships between different worlds. Keywords: topology, space, universe, cosmology, alien, other, homeworld, distance Received: June 2, 2019; accepted: August 1, 2019 Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 24, 2020: 99-112. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/24/10 Introduction In the stock of new forms of subjectivity, the Other reveals new aspects of interpreting the difference. The process of perception and understanding of the Other and the Alien is of immediate interest of polyphilosophical studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualities of Bordering Spaces a Conceptual Experiment with Reference to Georg Simmel’S Sociology of Space
    Qualities of Bordering Spaces A Conceptual Experiment with Reference to Georg Simmel’s Sociology of Space Sabrina Ellebrecht INTRODUCTION Inspired by the spatial turn and with the consequent impetus of deessen- tialising borders in general, this contribution is interested in the qualities of bordering spaces (Grenz-Räume). Assuming that borders can be con- ceived of as spaces of their own right, some of their general qualities are inquired. For that purpose, this contribution applies Georg Simmel’s so- ciology of space, set out in his 1908 essay on “Space and the Spatial Order of Society,” to the empirical example of the external border of the Europe- an Union (EU) in the Mediterranean Sea. In the conceptual experiment below, each of Simmel’s qualities of space (Raumqualitäten) are briefly ex- plained. The experiment then consists of applying these qualities of space to selected analysis of the EU border management in the Mediterranean region. From this, some proposed general qualities of bordering spaces are extrapolated.1 1 | Passages in German or French texts have been translated by the author when not available in English. With regard to quotations from Simmel, I have decided to provide them in the respective footnote. 46 Sabrina Ellebrecht APPLYING SIMMEL’S QUALITIES OF SPACE TO BORDERING PROCESSES Several authors refer to Simmel’s sociology of space and discuss its poten- tial analytical value.2 Some of the more controversial aspects of Simmel’s approach are, firstly, his use of the euclidic, and with it the idea of an ab- solute space, frequently subsumed under the metaphor of the container.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Contested Landscapes—Space, Place, and Identity in Contemporary Ireland
    Introduction: Contested Landscapes—Space, Place, and Identity in Contemporary Ireland Henrike Rau Any place is a political place, it’s a cultural space, it’s a landscape. —Alfredo Jaar 2007 Ireland’s transition from a predominantly rural to a (sub)urban society over the course of the twentieth century coincided with fundamental changes in its socio-cultural and environmental fabric (Corcoran et al. 2007; Moore and Scott 2005; Punch 2004).1 In particular, the recent suburbanization of many Irish towns and cities has raised interesting questions about the spatial organization of human social life. How important is public space for democratic participation? What kinds of spaces do people require to engage with others, or to get involved in community activities? Can we use spatial resources more sustainably and, if so, what are the consequences of such a transition for public and private spaces? Planned suburbanization in Ireland began in the early twentieth century in response to housing problems in working class neighbor- hoods in Dublin’s inner city, and the impacts of this spatial strategy have been subject to heated political debate ever since (McManus 2003). A “second wave” of increased and accelerated suburbaniza- tion during the so-called Celtic Tiger boom of the 1990s and early 2000s resulted in mixed responses, with “a negative view of the sub- urbs [infusing] the sociological literature and public imagination” (Cor- coran et al. 2007: 175). Some have celebrated the increase in demand for housing and infrastructure as a sign of greater prosperity, improved social conditions, and the reversal of demographic trends from emi- gration to immigration.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing and Reading: Notes Towards a Theory and a Method
    CROSSING AND READING: NOTES TOWARDS A THEORY AND A METHOD Johan Schimanski Here I wish to propose a theoretical basis for a border poetics by thinking through the border not in its static and mapped configurations, but from the processual and embodied perspective of the border-crossing narrative. I will be suggesting a set of seven processes involved in the act of crossing a border, implicating in turn a model of five border planes with which to organize a border reading.1 I will also be discussing the implications of these processes and planes for reading such crossings in literature and other narrative. The numbers seven and five must be taken as tentative; I have yet to find any secure argument justifying these divisions beyond that of experience with different border readings. Indeed, what follows takes as its premise that the border and thus the border crossing can only be seen from particular, embodied viewpoints and are ultimately unmappable. Crossing over into the realm of border theory is like any other border crossing: marked by the crossing, we both enter a new realm and cut ourselves off from it by bringing the border with us. In our negotiations, the border is liable to shift and change; and entering into border theory, we must allow for the possibility that our conception of the border may be transformed and that any particular theory or principle of the border may lose its meaning.2 It has been argued that all border studies are implicated at some point in a politics of power, and it seems to me imperative not to lock such efforts into a formation not open to revision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Production of Age, Space and Exclusion
    The social production of age, space and exclusion: Towards a more theory-driven understanding of spatial exclusion mechanisms in later life Thibauld Moulaert, Anna Wanka, Matthias Drilling To cite this version: Thibauld Moulaert, Anna Wanka, Matthias Drilling. The social production of age, space and ex- clusion: Towards a more theory-driven understanding of spatial exclusion mechanisms in later life. Sociální studia / Social Studies, Masaryk University, 2018, 15 (1), pp.9-23. hal-01895265v2 HAL Id: hal-01895265 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01895265v2 Submitted on 4 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Social Production of Age, Space and Exclusion: Towards a More Theory‑Driven Understanding of Spatial Exclusion Mechanisms in Later Life1 Thibauld Moulaert, Anna Wanka, Matthias Drilling ABSTRACT Gerontology has for a long time been described as “data rich, but theory poor”. This is true for the study of spatial exclusion, too: in a recent scoping review on old‑age exclusion, Walsh and his colleagues called for more theoretical work in the field of spatial exclusion. To answer this call, our article sketches out a heuristic model of an “ageing, space and exclusion” triangle, mainly based upon Lefebvrian thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilburg University Surveillance in Urban Nightscapes Timan, T
    Tilburg University Surveillance in urban nightscapes Timan, T. Published in: technoscienza Publication date: 2013 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Timan, T. (2013). Surveillance in urban nightscapes: A STS-Informed perspective. technoscienza, 2013(2). http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/166/109 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. sep. 2021 Cover’s comment No stars When artists draw on materials and techniques from an area such as science, they must be able to keep free from demonstration and verification. It is to be good at having a lyrical approach, imagining “the Earth is still flat" and considering sci- ence and technology as mysterious and fantastic tools. In the proposed image, a model of the tetrahedron designed by the Canadian scientist and inventor Alexander Graham Bell as a module for the gliders is al- tered.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Mobility in Social Theory Ettore Recchi, Aurore Flipo
    Spatial Mobility in Social Theory Ettore Recchi, Aurore Flipo To cite this version: Ettore Recchi, Aurore Flipo. Spatial Mobility in Social Theory. SocietàMutamentoPolitica. Rivista italiana di sociologia, Firenze University Press, 2019, Spatial Mobility in Social Theory, 10 (20), pp.125-137. 10.13128/smp-11051. hal-02443307 HAL Id: hal-02443307 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02443307 Submitted on 17 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SOCIETÀ MUTA MENTOPOLITICA RIVISTA ITALIANA DI SOCIOLOGIA Spatial Mobility in Social Theory Citation: E. Recchi, A. Flipo (2019) Spatial Mobility in Social Theory. Ettore Recchi, Aurore Flipo SocietàMutamentoPolitica 10(20): 125-137. doi: 10.13128/smp-11051 Copyright: © 2019 E. Recchi, A. Flipo. Abstract. While the concept of ‘mobility’ lends itself to a variety of metaphorical mean- This is an open access, peer-reviewed ings, ‘spatial mobility’ is in fact poorly theorized in the history of sociology. Nonethe- article published by Firenze University less, it plays an underrated role in the theories of all the classics of the discipline: Marx Press (http://www.fupress.com/smp) and Engels, Weber, Durkheim, Simmel, and the Chicago School.
    [Show full text]
  • Time and Spatial and Social Turns in Architectural Research
    Chapter 1 Introduction: Time and Spatial and Social Turns in Architectural Research Tuuli Lähdesmäki During the past four decades, the connections and interaction between space and social relations have raised considerable critical interest in academia. Among other much discussed scholarly ‘turns’ in human sciences, the spa- tial turn has influenced the understanding of reality as constructed and de- termined by complex spatial relations. The spatial turn has introduced to scholarly discussions concepts and metaphors borrowed, for example, from geography,1 topography, and physics, and theoretical views developed in phi- losophy, cultural and urban geography, sociology, and anthropology. It has also participated in the blurring of disciplinary boundaries by increasing interest in the sociology of space in humanities and the spatiality of cultural practices in social sciences. Edward W. Soja has described the spatial turn as ‘a response to a longstanding ontological and epistemological bias that privileges time over space in all the human sciences, including spatial disciplines like geography and architecture’.2 In this view, Soja emphasizes temporality and spatiality as distinguished ontologies, of which the former has dominated scholarly discus- sions until the last decades of the 20th century. Simultaneously, the spatial turn in human sciences has led to a ‘social turn’ in disciplines that explore urban space, the built environment, and architecture. Due to the ‘social turn’, scholars in architectural history and theory have become increasingly interested in, for example, questions concerning class, power, gender, race, and ethnicity.3 1 According to Mike Crang and Nigel Thrift, the spatialized vocabulary of geography in other disciplines, such as cultural studies and more broadly in humanities, is often deployed in various theoretical discussions unrelated to or ignorant of geography as a discipline.
    [Show full text]