341 Subpart F—General Requirements—Importers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

341 Subpart F—General Requirements—Importers Census Bureau, Commerce § 30.70 (2) Shipments of USML articles must tors of the exporting carriers and U.S. meet the predeparture reporting re- principal party and/or the authorized quirements in the ITAR (22 CFR parts agents) must retain documents or 120–130). records pertaining to the shipment for (3) For shipments of rough diamonds, five (5) years from the date of export. the proof of filing citation shall in- CBP, the Census Bureau, and other par- clude the statement, ‘‘NO SED RE- ticipating agencies may require that QUIRED—AES,’’ followed by the re- these documents be produced at any turned confirmation number provided time within the 5-year time period for by the AES when the transmission is inspection or copying. These records accepted, referred to as the ITN. The ITN is required to be shown on the may be retained in an elected format, Kimberley Process Certificate for all including electronic or hard copy as exports (reexports) of rough diamonds provided in the applicable agency’s reg- to certify that the diamonds have been ulations. Acceptance of the documents controlled through the Kimberley by CBP or the Census Bureau does not Process Certification Scheme, as de- relieve the USPPI or the authorized fined in section 3 of Public Law 108–19 agent from providing complete and ac- of the Clean Diamond Trade Act and curate information after the fact. The implemented in the Rough Diamonds Department of State or other regu- Control Regulations (31 CFR part 592). latory agencies may have additional (4) For USPPIs who have been ap- recordkeeping requirements for ex- proved to participate in Filing Option ports. 4, the exemption statement, ‘‘NO SED REQUIRED-AES4,’’ followed by the [68 FR 42542, July 17, 2003] USPPI’s EIN followed by the filer’s identification number if other than the Subpart F—General USPPI files the data. Requirements—Importers [68 FR 42542, July 17, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 59879, Oct. 20, 2003] SOURCE: 41 FR 9134, Mar. 3, 1976, unless oth- erwise noted. Redesignated at 64 FR 40977, § 30.66 Support, documentation and July 28, 1999. recordkeeping requirements. (a) Support. [email protected] is an § 30.70 Statistical information re- online service that allows electronic quired on import entries. filers to seek assistance pertaining to Information for statistics on mer- AES. AESDirect is supported by a help chandise entering the United States desk available twelve (12) hours a day, from foreign countries, U.S. Foreign seven (7) days a week. Trade Zones, and from the Virgin Is- (b) Documentation. Filers using the lands of the United States, and other AESDirect are able to print out from nonforeign areas (except Puerto Rico), the AESDirect a validated record of the filer’s submission. Filers using AES are is required to be reported by importers able to print records containing date of on the following CBP entry and with- submission and a unique identification drawal forms respectively required by number for each AES record submitted. U.S. CBP regulations for individual The Census Bureau will maintain an transactions: Custom Forms 7500, 7501, electronic file of data sent through 7502, 7505, 7506, 7519, 7521, and 7535, and AES to ensure that an individual is on CBP Form 7512 when used as an able to receive from the system, a vali- intransit entry to document immediate dated record of the submission. The exportation or transportation and ex- USPPI or the authorized agent of the portation. Upon request, the importer USPPI or the authorized agent of the or import broker must provide the Cen- foreign principal party in interest may sus Bureau with information or docu- request a copy of the electronic record mentation necessary to verify the ac- submitted as provided for in § 30.91 of curacy or resolve problems regarding this part. (c) Recordkeeping. All parties to the export transaction (owners and opera- 341 VerDate Aug<31>2005 03:32 Feb 18, 2007 Jkt 211048 PO 00000 Frm 00351 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211048.XXX 211048 § 30.70 15 CFR Subtitle B, Ch. I (1–1–07 Edition) the reported import transaction re- dise after the initial unlading in the ceived by the Census Bureau. The fol- United States. lowing items of information for statis- (4) For merchandise arriving in the tics shall be reported on the respective United States by means of transpor- forms: 7 tation other than vessel or air, the (a) District and port code. (All forms.) means of transportation from the for- The CBP district code number and the eign country is required, in such terms port code number (as shown in Sched- as ‘‘parcel post,’’ ‘‘registered mail,’’ ule D, Classification of CBP Districts and ‘‘railroad,’’ ‘‘trucks,’’ ‘‘pipeline,’’ etc. Ports) for the CBP port of entry or fil- (c) Foreign port of lading. (1) (CBP ing shall be supplied. (Where CBP does Forms 7501, 7502, 7512 and 7521.) For not require that the District and Port merchandise arriving in the United codes be inserted by importers, the States by vessel or air, the name and codes will be filled in by CBP so that country of the foreign port at which all entries and withdrawals received by the merchandise was actually loaded the Bureau of the Census will bear on the vessel or aircraft that carried these codes.) the merchandise to the United States (b) Importing vessel or carrier. (Not re- is required. This information is not re- quired for merchandise entering U.S. quired for merchandise entering the CBP territory from U.S. Foreign Trade U.S. CBP territory from a U.S. Foreign Zones.) (1) (CBP Forms 7501, 7502, 7512, Trade Zone. For shipments originating and 7521.) Information is required as to in either Canada or Mexico by rail, the carrier or means of transportation truck, pipeline, or other nonvessel/ by which the merchandise was trans- nonair mode of transportation, supply ported from a foreign country to the the name of the province (Canada) or first port of unloading in the United state (Mexico) where the merchandise States. If the merchandise has been was first loaded for exportation to the further transported in bond between United States. ports in the United States after having (2) For merchandise transshipped been unladen from the carrier on which overseas in the course of shipment to it arrived in the United States, the the United States, whether or not cov- name of the domestic carrier shall not ered by a through bill of lading, the in- be substituted, and the information formation furnished shall reflect only furnished shall reflect the name of the the foreign port at which the merchan- carrier or means of transportation by dise was loaded on the vessel, aircraft, which the merchandise arrived in the or other carrier which transported it to first U.S. port of unlading. the first U.S. port of unlading. Neither (2) For merchandise arriving in the the foreign port of original lading nor United States by vessel, the name of any port of lading other than the last the importing vessel is required. The foreign port of lading shall be sub- importing vessel is the vessel which stituted. When a single CBP form cov- transported the merchandise from the ers merchandise loaded at more than foreign port of lading to the first U.S. one foreign port, the foreign port of port of unlading. lading shall be indicated separately in (3) For merchandise arriving in the the ‘‘Marks and numbers and Country United States by air, the name and na- of origin’’ column immediately below tionality of the importing airline is re- the Country of origin designation and quired. The importing airline is the on the same line as the merchandise airline which carried the merchandise laden at each foreign port. from the foreign port of lading to the (3) For merchandise entering the U.S. first U.S. port of unlading, and not a CBP territory from a U.S. Foreign domestic airline carrying the merchan- Trade Zone, the number of the Foreign Trade Zone, preceded by the letters 7 The information required for statistical ‘‘FTZ’’ shall be shown in this space. purposes is in most cases also required by (d) U.S. port of unlading. (Not re- CBP regulations for other purposes. (See § 30.80 for special reporting instructions for quired for merchandise entering U.S. merchandise entering United States CBP CBP territory from U.S. Foreign Trade Territory from United States Foreign Trade Zones.) (1) (CBP Forms 7501, 7502, 7512, Zones.) and 7521.) For merchandise arriving in 342 VerDate Aug<31>2005 03:32 Feb 18, 2007 Jkt 211048 PO 00000 Frm 00352 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\211048.XXX 211048 Census Bureau, Commerce § 30.70 the United States by vessel or air, the or material added to an article in an- U.S. port (as listed in Schedule D) at other foreign country or the Virgin Is- which the merchandise was unloaded lands of the United States must effect from the importing vessel or aircraft is a substantial transformation in order required, whether or not such port is a to render such other country the CBP port of entry. (For example, if ‘‘country of origin.’’ Such substantial entry is filed at the Port of Los Ange- transformations include smelting of les for merchandise unloaded from the ores, refining of crude products, and importing vessel at Long Beach, Cali- the like. The country of origin is not fornia, the entry should show Long changed when the merchandise is sub- Beach as the port of unlading.) jected in another country merely to (2) When merchandise is transported minor manipulations, such as sorting, in bond from the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 35/Thursday, February 21, 2013
    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2013 / Notices 12135 Dated: February 13, 2013. Participants, and to update the list as Ghana—Precious Minerals and Marketing J. Adam Ereli, necessary. Section 2 of Executive Order Company Ltd. Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau 13312 delegates this function to the Guinea—Ministry of Mines and Geology. of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Secretary of State. Guyana—Geology and Mines Commission. Department of State. Section 3(7) of the Act defines India—The Gem and Jewelry Export [FR Doc. 2013–04005 Filed 2–20–13; 8:45 am] ‘‘Participant’’ as a state, customs Promotion Council. BILLING CODE 4710–05–P territory, or regional economic Indonesia—Directorate General of Foreign integration organization identified by Trade of the Ministry of Trade. the Secretary of State. Section 3(3) of the Israel—The Diamond Controller. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Act defines ‘‘Exporting Authority’’ as Japan—Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. [Public Notice 8190] one or more entities designated by a Participant from whose territory a Kazakhstan—Ministry of Finance. Republic of Korea—Ministry of Commerce, List of Participating Countries and shipment of rough diamonds is being Industry and Energy. Entities (Hereinafter Known as exported as having the authority to Laos—Ministry of Finance. ‘‘Participants’’) Under the Clean validate a Kimberley Process Certificate. Lebanon—Ministry of Economy and Trade. Diamond Trade Act (Pub. L. 108–19) Section 3(4) of the Act defines ‘‘Importing Authority’’ as one or more Lesotho—Commissioner of Mines and and Section 2 of Executive Order Geology. 13312 of July 29, 2003 entities designated by a Participant into whose territory a shipment of rough Liberia—Ministry of Lands, Mines and AGENCY: Department of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamonds on the Souls of Her Shoes: the Kimberly Process and the Morality Exception to WTO Restrictions
    Washington and Lee University School of Law Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons Scholarly Articles Faculty Scholarship 2007 Diamonds on the Souls of Her Shoes: The Kimberly Process and the Morality Exception to WTO Restrictions Karen E. Woody Washington and Lee University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the International Trade Law Commons Recommended Citation Karen E. Woody, Diamonds on the Souls of Her Shoes: The Kimberly Process and the Morality Exception to WTO Restrictions, 22 Conn. J. Int'l L. 335 (2007). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIAMONDS ON THE SOULS OF HER SHOES: THE KIMBERLY PROCESS AND THE MORALITY EXCEPTION TO WTO RESTRICTIONS Karen E. Woody' INTRODUCTION Al-haji Sawaneh, a child living in Sierra Leone, was kidnapped and conscripted into a rebel group.2 Shortly thereafter, he became a member of the Small Boys Unit ("S.B.U.") of the rebel group, participating in a number of horrific crimes against civilians and Sierra Leone's government soldiers. Sawaneh was one of thousands of child soldiers
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participating Countries And
    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 92 / Friday, May 11, 2012 / Notices 27831 Dated: May 7, 2012. and procedures of the KPCS. The Republic of Congo—Ministry of Mines. Naomi Sipple, referenced regulations are contained at Croatia—Ministry of Economy. Reports Clearance Analyst, Office of 31 CFR part 592 (‘‘Rough Diamonds European Union—DG/External Regulations and Reports Clearance, Social Control Regulations’’). Section 6(b) of Relations/A.2. Security Administration. the Act requires the President to publish Ghana—Precious Minerals and [FR Doc. 2012–11328 Filed 5–10–12; 8:45 am] in the Federal Register a list of all Marketing Company Ltd. BILLING CODE 4191–02–P Participants, and all Importing and Guinea—Ministry of Mines and Exporting Authorities of Participants, Geology. and to update the list as necessary. Guyana—Geology and Mines DEPARTMENT OF STATE Section 2 of Executive Order 13312 Commission. delegates this function to the Secretary India—The Gem and Jewelry Export [Public Notice 7878] of State. Section 3(7) of the Act defines Promotion Council. Indonesia—Directorate General of List of Participating Countries and ‘‘Participant’’ as a state, customs territory, or regional economic Foreign Trade of the Ministry of Entities Under the Clean Diamond Trade. Trade Act of 2003 integration organization identified by the Secretary of State. Section 3(3) of the Israel—The Diamond Controller. AGENCY: Department of State. Act defines ‘‘Exporting Authority’’ as Japan—Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. ACTION: Notice. one or more entities designated by a Participant from whose territory a Republic of Korea—Ministry of SUMMARY: The Department of State is shipment of rough diamonds is being Commerce, Industry and Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-06-978 Conflict Diamonds: Agency Actions Needed To
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees GAO September 2006 CONFLICT DIAMONDS Agency Actions Needed to Enhance Implementation of the Clean Diamond Trade Act GAO-06-978 September 2006 CONFLICT DIAMONDS Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Agency Actions Needed to Enhance Highlights of GAO-06-978, a report to Implementation of the Clean Diamond congressional committees Trade Act Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In 2003, the United States and other The United States has used multiple U.S. agencies and a private, not-for- countries began implementing the profit entity to implement the domestic and international provisions of the Kimberley Process Certification Clean Diamond Trade Act (CDTA). The Departments of State and the Scheme (KPCS) to curtail the trade Treasury have led U.S. efforts to implement the domestic provisions of the of rough diamonds that had fueled act; State has led the U.S. efforts to curtail trade in conflict diamonds severe conflicts in Africa, known as conflict diamonds. CDTA provides abroad. Domestically, the Departments of State, the Treasury, Homeland the statutory framework for U.S. Security, and Commerce, and the private entity, called the U.S. Kimberley implementation of the KPCS. As Process Authority (USKPA), have been responsible for controlling U.S. mandated in CDTA, this report (1) imports and exports of rough diamonds. Internationally, State, the U.S. describes the institutional Agency for International Development (USAID), and the U.S. Geological framework established to Survey have helped to strengthen KPCS. implement the act, (2) examines implementation of the domestic Domestically, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme: the Irsf T Step Down the Long Road to Solving the Blood Diamond Trade Problem Julie L
    University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Business Law Review 7-1-2005 Is Diamond Smuggling Forever? The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme: The irsF t Step Down the Long Road to Solving the Blood Diamond Trade Problem Julie L. Fishman Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umblr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Julie L. Fishman, Is Diamond Smuggling Forever? The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme: The First Step Down the Long Road to Solving the Blood Diamond Trade Problem, 13 U. Miami Bus. L. Rev. 217 (2014) Available at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umblr/vol13/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Business Law Review by an authorized administrator of Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IS DIAMOND SMUGGLING FOREVER? THE KIMBERLEY PROCESS CERTIFICATION SCHEME: THE FIRST STEP DOWN THE LONG ROAD TO SOLVING THE BLOOD DIAMOND TRADE PROBLEM JULIE L. FISHMAN* I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 217 II. THE BLOOD DIAMOND PROBLEM: FUEL FOR AFRICAN REBEL FORCE REBELLION .............................. 219 III. BLOOD DIAMONDS AND THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO ................................... 220 IV. TAKING A STAND TO END BLOOD DIAMOND TRADE ..... 224 A. The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme .......... 224 B. The United States Takes A Role: The Clean Diamond Trade A ct ................................... 230 V. WHYTHE KIMBERLEY PROCESS CERTIFICATION SCHEME IS NOT ENDING THE BLOOD DIAMOND TRADE ........... 233 A. The Road Is But a Path ........................ 234 B. The Road Needs Patrolling .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 119/Thursday, June 21, 2007/Notices
    34326 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 119 / Thursday, June 21, 2007 / Notices general, to protect investors and the Funds, all of which are aware of the Section 2 of Executive Order 13312 of public interest. The Commission also proposed listing and annual fees. July 29, 2003, the Department of State finds that the proposed rule change is The Commission believes the Fee is identifying all the Participants consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Schedule overall is consistent with the eligible for trade in rough diamonds Act,12 which requires that the rules of Act. The Commission notes that the under the Act, and their respective the exchange provide for the equitable proposed annual and listing fees are Importing and Exporting Authorities, allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and identical to the fee schedule for Closed- and revising the previously published other charges among its members and End Funds and Derivative Securities list of December 26, 2006 (Volume 71, issuers and other persons using its Products of the New York Stock Number 247, page 77435) to include facilities. Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) as set forth in Liberia. NYSE Arca’s proposal specifies the Sections 902.04 and 902.07 of the NYSE listing fees and annual fees applicable to Listed Company Manual. The FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue Derivative Securities Products, Closed- Commission notes that applying Saarnio, Special Advisor for Conflict End Funds, and Structured Products. sections of the amended Fee Schedule, Diamonds, Bureau of Economic and Numerical examples on how fees are effective as of January 1, 2007, will Business Affairs, Department of State, calculated provide appropriate enable the Exchange to apply its Fee (202) 647–1713.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing the Clean Diamond Trade Act
    EO 13312 Title 3—The President at law or in equity, against the United States, its departments, agencies, or other entities, its officers or employees, or any other person. GEORGE W. BUSH THE WHITE HOUSE, July 29, 2003. Executive Order 13312 of July 29, 2003 Implementing the Clean Diamond Trade Act By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Clean Diamond Trade Act (Public Law 108–19) (the ‘‘Act’’), the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), section 5 of the United Nations Participation Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and in view of the national emergency described and declared in Ex- ecutive Order 13194 of January 18, 2001, and expanded in scope in Execu- tive Order 13213 of May 22, 2001, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, note that, in response to the role played by the illicit trade in diamonds in fueling conflict and human rights violations in Sierra Leone, the President declared a national emergency in Executive Order 13194 and imposed restrictions on the importation of rough diamonds into the United States from Sierra Leone. I expanded the scope of that emergency in Executive Order 13213 and prohibited absolutely the importation of rough diamonds from Liberia. I further note that representatives of the United States and numerous other countries announced in the Interlaken Declaration of November 5, 2002, the launch of the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) for rough diamonds, under which Participants prohibit the importation of rough dia- monds from, or the exportation of rough diamonds to, a non-Participant and require that shipments of rough diamonds from or to a Participant be controlled through the KPCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 5/Friday, January 8, 2021/Notices
    1560 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2021 / Notices The Interest Rates are: 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, system determined by the President to Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734. meet substantially the standards, Percent SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice practices, and procedures of the KPCS. of an Administrative declaration for the The referenced regulations are For Physical Damage:. contained at 31 CFR part 592 (‘‘Rough Homeowners With Credit Avail- State of California, dated 06/17/2020, is able Elsewhere ...................... 2.375 hereby amended to establish the Diamond Control Regulations’’) (68 FR Homeowners Without Credit incident period for this disaster as 45777, August 4, 2003). Available Elsewhere .............. 1.188 beginning 05/26/2020 and continuing Section 6(b) of the Act requires the Businesses With Credit Avail- through 12/28/2020. President to publish in the Federal able Elsewhere ...................... 6.000 All other information in the original Register a list of all Participants, and all Businesses Without Credit declaration remains unchanged. Importing and Exporting Authorities of Available Elsewhere .............. 3.000 Participants, and to update the list as Non-Profit Organizations With (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) necessary. Section 2 of Executive Order Credit Available Elsewhere ... 2.750 13312 of July 29, 2003 delegates this Non-Profit Organizations With- Jovita Carranza, function to the Secretary of State. out Credit Available Else- Administrator. where ..................................... 2.750 Section 3(7) of the Act defines For Economic Injury:. [FR Doc. 2021–00169 Filed 1–7–21; 8:45 am] ‘‘Participant’’ as a state, customs Businesses & Small Agricultural BILLING CODE 8026–03–P territory, or regional economic Cooperatives Without Credit integration organization identified by Available Elsewhere .............
    [Show full text]
  • Kimberley Process Clean Diamond Trade Act Fact Sheet
    Kimberley Process Clean Diamond Trade Act The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme Export Requirements regulates the international rough diamond trade. The . Exports of rough diamonds from the United scheme is an internationally recognized certification States must be accompanied by a Kimberley system that establishes requirements to designate certificate, obtained from a U.S. Kimberley shipments of rough diamonds as conflict-free and prevent Process licensee and validated by the U.S. them from entering legitimate trade. Census Bureau. The Clean Diamond Trade Act was implemented on . Rough diamonds may only be exported to countries that participate in the Kimberley Process. July 29, 2003. The act requires that rough diamonds www.federalregister.gov imported or exported from the United States be controlled through the Kimberley Process. Exports of rough diamonds must be sealed in a tamper-resistant container. Packaging must have Importing requirements an indicator or barrier that can reasonably provide visible evidence that tampering had . Imports of rough diamonds must be accompanied occurred. by an original Kimberley Process certificate. U.S. Census Bureau requires that export information in filed through the automated export . Rough diamonds may be imported or exported system. Submitting export information through only to countries that participate in the Kimberley this system must be done in advance and Process. www.federalregister.gov confirmed by the return of an internal transaction Sheet number. Regardless of quantity or value, shipments must be entered on a formal entry. Importers may . Returning this number to the filer will validate the retain a customs broker at the relevant port of Kimberley certificate to export rough diamonds entry to assist with filing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implementation and Effectiveness of the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme in the United States
    The Implementation and Effectiveness of the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme in the United States ALBENA P. PETROVA* I. Introduction The Republic of Ivory Coast used to be the fourth-largest economy in Sub-Saharan Africa until the failed military coup attempt in 2002.' Since then the country has been split into two parts. The government controls the southern half, while rebellion groups have taken over the north, which is rich in diamond mines.' The diamonds originating from those mines are called "conflict" or "blood" diamonds because the rebellion forces use the revenues from the diamond sales to purchase arms, which halts peace-making efforts in the country.' In 2004, the United Nations Security Council imposed a ban on imports of 4 diamonds from Ivory Coast and renewed that ban in December 2005. Ivory Coast is a participant in the Kimberley Process, a forum in which participating countries have designed an international certification scheme for rough diamonds known *2005-2006 Fellow at the Institute of International Economic Law, Washington, D.C.; LL.M., Georgetown University Law Center; JD, American University Washington College of Law; MA, Georgetown University School of Foreign Service; AB, Mount Holyoke College. The author is an attorney admitted to practice law in New York and the District of Columbia. Special thanks to Professor Richard Chovanec for his invaluable comments. The author may be contacted by e-mail at [email protected]. 1. See CIA-The World Factbook, Cote d'Ivoire, (Aug. 22, 2006), http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/ factbook/geos/iv.html (stating that Ivory Coast was among "the most prosperous..
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 108–19 108Th Congress an Act to Implement Effective Measures to Stop Trade in Conflict Diamonds, and for Other Apr
    PUBLIC LAW 108–19—APR. 25, 2003 117 STAT. 631 Public Law 108–19 108th Congress An Act To implement effective measures to stop trade in conflict diamonds, and for other Apr. 25, 2003 purposes. [H.R. 1584] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Clean Diamond Trade Act. SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 19 USC 3901 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Diamond Trade Act’’. note. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 19 USC 3901. Congress finds the following: (1) Funds derived from the sale of rough diamonds are being used by rebels and state actors to finance military activi- ties, overthrow legitimate governments, subvert international efforts to promote peace and stability, and commit horrifying atrocities against unarmed civilians. During the past decade, more than 6,500,000 people from Sierra Leone, Angola, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo have been driven from their homes by wars waged in large part for control of diamond mining areas. A million of these are refugees eking out a miserable existence in neighboring countries, and tens of thou- sands have fled to the United States. Approximately 3,700,000 people have died during these wars. (2) The countries caught in this fighting are home to nearly 70,000,000 people whose societies have been torn apart not only by fighting but also by terrible human rights violations. (3) Human rights and humanitarian advocates, the diamond trade as represented by the World Diamond Council, and the United States Government have been working to block the trade in conflict diamonds.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 108–19 108Th Congress an Act to Implement Effective Measures to Stop Trade in Conflict Diamonds, and for Other Apr
    PUBLIC LAW 108–19—APR. 25, 2003 117 STAT. 631 Public Law 108–19 108th Congress An Act To implement effective measures to stop trade in conflict diamonds, and for other Apr. 25, 2003 purposes. [H.R. 1584] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Clean Diamond Trade Act. SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 19 USC 3901 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Diamond Trade Act’’. note. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 19 USC 3901. Congress finds the following: (1) Funds derived from the sale of rough diamonds are being used by rebels and state actors to finance military activi- ties, overthrow legitimate governments, subvert international efforts to promote peace and stability, and commit horrifying atrocities against unarmed civilians. During the past decade, more than 6,500,000 people from Sierra Leone, Angola, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo have been driven from their homes by wars waged in large part for control of diamond mining areas. A million of these are refugees eking out a miserable existence in neighboring countries, and tens of thou- sands have fled to the United States. Approximately 3,700,000 people have died during these wars. (2) The countries caught in this fighting are home to nearly 70,000,000 people whose societies have been torn apart not only by fighting but also by terrible human rights violations. (3) Human rights and humanitarian advocates, the diamond trade as represented by the World Diamond Council, and the United States Government have been working to block the trade in conflict diamonds.
    [Show full text]