DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: a New Regulatory Framework for the 21St Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: a New Regulatory Framework for the 21St Century THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://www.nap.edu/21824 SHARE Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century DETAILS 282 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-37948-9 | DOI: 10.17226/21824 AUTHORS BUY THIS BOOK Committee on Federal Research Regulations and Reporting Requirements: A New Framework for Research Universities in the 21st Century; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Board FIND RELATED TITLES on Higher Education and Workforce; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century Committee on Federal Research Regulations and Reporting Requirements: A New Framework for Research Universities in the 21st Century Committee on Science, Technology, and Law Board on Higher Education and Workforce Policy and Global Affairs Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 This activity was supported at least in part with federal funds from the U.S. Department of Education under Contract No. ED-OPE-14-C-0116 and under Contract No. HHSN26300067 with the National Institutes of Health of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations ex- pressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project, nor does mention of trade names, commer- cial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-37948-9 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-37948-2 Digital Object Identifier: 10.17226/21824 Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334- 3313; http://www.nap.edu. Copyright 2016 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Optimizing the Nation’s Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21824. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the na- tion on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the na- tion. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was estab- lished in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished con- tributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president. The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineer- ing, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy deci- sions. The Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding con- tributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engi- neering, and medicine. Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.national-academies.org. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century COMMITTEE ON FEDERAL RESEARCH REGULATIONS AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES IN THE 21ST CENTURY Chair LARRY R. FAULKNER, President Emeritus, The University of Texas at Austin Vice Chair HARRIET RABB, Vice President and General Counsel, The Rockefeller University Members ILESANMI ADESIDA (NAE), Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and Provost, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ANN ARVIN (NAM), Lucile Salter Packard Professor of Pediatrics and Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Vice Provost and Dean of Research, Stanford University BARBARA E. BIERER, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Faculty Co-chair, Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center, Harvard University (Harvard MRCT) JONATHAN D. BREUL, Adjunct Professor, McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University CLAUDE R. CANIZARES (NAS), Bruno Rossi Professor of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ARTURO CASADEVALL (NAM), Professor and Chair, W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health JONATHAN R. COLE, John Mitchell Mason Professor of the University and Provost and Dean of Faculties (1989–2003), Columbia University LEE ELLIS, Professor of Surgical Oncology and Molecular and Cellular Oncology and the William C. Liedtke, Jr. Chair in Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center GEOFFREY E. GRANT, President, Research Advocates JOSEPH R. HAYWOOD, Assistant Vice President for Regulatory Affairs and Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University STEVEN JOFFE, Emanuel and Robert Hart Associate Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine DAVID KORN (NAM), Professor of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School CHARLES F. LOUIS, Professor of Cell Biology and Neuroscience Emeritus and former Vice Chancellor for Research, University of California, Riverside v Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century DAVID W. ROBINSON, Professor and Executive Vice Provost, Oregon Health and Science University THOMAS J. ROSOL, Professor, Veterinary Biosciences; Senior Advisor, Life Sciences, University Office of Technology Commercialization and Knowledge Transfer; and Special Assistant to the Vice President for Research, The Ohio State University STUART SHAPIRO, Associate Professor and Director, Public Policy Program, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University Staff ANNE-MARIE MAZZA, Study Director and Senior Director, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law THOMAS RUDIN, Director, Board on Higher Education and Workforce ELIZABETH O’HARE, Program Officer, Board on Higher Education and Workforce (until January 2016) STEVEN KENDALL, Program Officer, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law NINA BOSTON, Senior Project Assistant, Board on Higher Education and Workforce (until September 2015) KAROLINA KONARZEWSKA, Program Coordinator, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law vi Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND LAW Co-Chairs DAVID BALTIMORE (NAS/NAM), President Emeritus and Robert Andrews Millikan Professor of Biology, California Institute of Technology DAVID S. TATEL, Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Members THOMAS D. ALBRIGHT (NAS), Professor and Director, Vision Center Laboratory and Conrad T. Prebys Chair in Vision Research, Salk Institute for Biological Studies ANN ARVIN (NAM), Lucile Salter Packard Professor of Pediatrics and Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Vice Provost and Dean of Research, Stanford University BARBARA E. BIERER, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Faculty Co-chair, Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center, Harvard University (Harvard MRCT) CLAUDE R. CANIZARES (NAS), Bruno Rossi Professor of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ARTURO CASADEVALL (NAM), Professor and Chair, W. Harry Feinstone Department of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015 Annual Report
    2015 AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ANNUAL TM ADVANCING PHYSICS REPORT TM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY STRIVES TO Be the leading voice for physics and an authoritative source of physics information for the advancement of physics and the benefit of humanity Collaborate with national scientific societies for the advancement of science, science education, and the science community Cooperate with international physics societies to promote physics, to support physicists worldwide, and to foster international collaboration Have an active, engaged, and diverse membership, and support the activities of its units and members © 2016 American Physical Society During 2015, APS worked to institute the governance objective: “the advancement and diffusion of the knowledge changes approved by the membership in late 2014. In of physics.” APS is fully committed to the principles of OA accordance with the new Constitution & Bylaws, in to the extent that we can continue to support the production February the Board appointed our first Chief Executive of high-quality peer-reviewed journals. For many years APS Officer—Kate Kirby, the former Executive Officer—to has supported “green” OA and we have been fully compliant head the APS. Kate’s major task has been to transition with the 2013 directive from the Office of Science and the management of APS to a CEO model with a Senior Technology Policy that the publications resulting from Management Team. She appointed Mark Doyle as Chief U.S. federally funded research be accessible to the public 12 Information Officer, James Taylor as Chief Operating months after publication. Since APS is a major international Officer, and Matthew Salter as the new Publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSCRIPT Applications
    Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues TRANSCRIPT Applications J. Craig Venter, Ph.D. Founder and President, J. Craig Venter Institute George Church, Ph.D. Professor of Genetics, Harvard Medical School Kristala L. J. Prather, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Massachu- setts Institute of Technology Meeting 1, Session 2 July 8, 2010 Washington, D.C. Jim Wagner: Could we have our speakers come to the table. And if others could take their chairs, we’ll get under way. Thank you. Commission members, we need you as well, actually. I see them filter- ing up. I saw Nita out there. And there’s Bonnie in the back of the room. So that there is ample time for our speakers to present and for us to ask questions, let’s do get under way. Really, again, appreciate this morning’s conversation and the presenta- tions, helping us to — wow. Helping us to define what is and is not synthetic biology and to understand a little bit more about some of the science involved. This particular session, we are going to focus and we have asked our experts to focus more on applications. We’ll try to use a similar format. Have our speakers present for a brief period. You have the timer in front of you. Make sure after all of you have pre- sented the commission has time to ask questions. And then we’ll try to throw it open — not try to – we will, certainly, throw it open to the public for other questions they may have.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Diffusion of Scientific Innovation
    Driving Diffusion of Scientific Innovation - The Role of Institutional Entrepreneurship and Open Science in Synthetic Biology Vom Promotionsausschuss der Technischen Universit¨at Hamburg-Harburg zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) genehmigte Dissertation von Giulio Barth aus M¨unster 2018 Advisors: Prof. Dr. C. Ihl, Prof. Dr. M. G. M¨ohrle Institute of Entrepreneurship, TUHH i Gutachter: Prof. Dr. C. Ihl Prof. Dr. M. G. Mohrle¨ Vorsitz: Prof. Dr. C. Luthje¨ Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 14. September 2018 ”Our victory: inevitable; our timing: uncertain.” (Drew Endy, Assistant Professor Stanford University) i Abstract Scientific innovations need to widely diffuse to fully exploit their potential. Prior research investigated levers on the diffusion of scientific innovation with particular interest on institutions, e.g., settings of property rights. As institutional theory lacks in explaining emergence and shaping of institu- tions, the institutional entrepreneur approach faces these limitations. Key actors combine logics from multiple fields and convince their social context of their ideas to legitimate the creation of new institutions and shape an emerging field. This thesis validates theories on institutional entrepreneurs and investigates the end-to process from diffusing a logic to the impact of an established insti- tution on scientific innovations in context of the emerging synthetic biology. The field is expected to introduce the 5th revolution and characterized by the central logic of making biology an engineering discipline. In chapter 4 theories on institutional entrepreneurs driving diffusion of in- stitutional logics to shape an emerging field are validated. To measure the social influence mechanisms, the heterogeneous diffusion model is adapted to the institutional logic.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 March Meeting Program Guide
    MARCHMEETING2018 LOS ANGELES MARCH 5-9 PROGRAM GUIDE #apsmarch aps.org/meetingapp aps.org/meetings/march Senior Editor: Arup Chakraborty Robert T. Haslam Professor of Chemical Engineering; Professor of Chemistry, Physics, and Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, MIT Now welcoming submissions in the Physics of Living Systems Submit your best work at elifesci.org/physics-living-systems Image: D. Bonazzi (CC BY 2.0) Led by Senior Editor Arup Chakraborty, this dedicated new section of the open-access journal eLife welcomes studies in which experimental, theoretical, and computational approaches rooted in the physical sciences are developed and/or applied to provide deep insights into the collective properties and function of multicomponent biological systems and processes. eLife publishes groundbreaking research in the life and biomedical sciences. All decisions are made by working scientists. WELCOME t is a pleasure to welcome you to Los Angeles and to the APS March I Meeting 2018. As has become a tradition, the March Meeting is a spectacular gathering of an enthusiastic group of scientists from diverse organizations and backgrounds who have broad interests in physics. This meeting provides us an opportunity to present exciting new work as well as to learn from others, and to meet up with colleagues and make new friends. While you are here, I encourage you to take every opportunity to experience the amazing science that envelops us at the meeting, and to enjoy the many additional professional and social gatherings offered. Additionally, this is a year for Strategic Planning for APS, when the membership will consider the evolving mission of APS and where we want to go as a society.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD/DSI/AHTEG/2018/1/3 12 January 2018
    CBD Distr. GENERAL CBD/SBSTTA/22/INF/3 CBD/DSI/AHTEG/2018/1/3 12 January 2018 ENGLISH ONLY AD HOC TECHNICAL EXPERT GROUP ON SUBSIDIARY BODY ON SCIENTIFIC, DIGITAL SEQUENCE INFORMATION ON TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL GENETIC RESOURCES ADVICE Montreal, Canada, 13-16 February 2018 Twenty-second meeting Item 3 of the provisional agenda** Montreal, Canada, 2-7 July 2018 Item 3 of the provisional agenda*** FACT-FINDING AND SCOPING STUDY ON DIGITAL SEQUENCE INFORMATION ON GENETIC RESOURCES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL Note by the Executive Secretary 1. In decision XIII/16, paragraph 3(b), the Executive Secretary was requested to commission a fact-finding and scoping study, subject to the availability of funds, to clarify terminology and concepts and to assess the extent and the terms and conditions of the use of digital sequence information on genetic resources in the context of the Convention and the Nagoya Protocol. 2. Accordingly, the Executive Secretary commissioned a research team led by Ms. Sarah Laird of People and Plants International and Ms. Rachel Wynberg of the University of Cape Town, to carry out this study. The study was undertaken with the generous financial support of Canada, the European Union and Switzerland. 3. A draft of the study was made available online for peer review from 8 November to 1 December 2017. 1 The comments received in response have been made available online.2 The research team revised the study in the light of the comments received and the final version is presented below in the form and language in which it was received by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2007 (Volume 16, Number 7) Entire Issue
    July 2007 Volume 16, No. 7 www.aps.org/publications/apsnews APS NEWS Election Preview A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY • WWW.apS.ORG/PUBLICATIONS/apSNEWS Pages 6-7 Executive Board Resolution Thanks US physics team trains for competition in Iran By Katherine McAlpine Legislators for Support of Science Twenty-four high school stu- The APS Executive Board bill authorizes nearly $60 billion dents comprising the US Phys- has passed a resolution thanking for various programs for FY 2008 ics Olympiad team vied for five House and Senate policy makers through FY 2011. The bill would places on the traveling team at for recently-passed legislation double the NSF budget over five the University of Maryland from that strengthens the science, math years and double the DOE Office May 22nd to June 1st. Those and engineering activities of our of Science budget over 10 years. chosen to travel will compete nation. The House of Representatives this month against teams from “Sustaining and improving the passed five separate authorization all over the world at Isfahan standard of living of American bills, which were then combined University of Technology in Is- citizens, achieving energy security into one bill, H.R. 2272, the 21st fahan, Iran. and environmental sustainability, Century Competitiveness Act of Over 3,100 US Physics Team providing the jobs of tomorrow 2007. The bill would put the NSF hopefuls took the preliminary and defending our nation against budget and the NIST Scientific examination in January, and 200 aggressors all require federal in- and Technical Research and Ser- were given a second exam in vestments in science education vices budget on track to double in March to determine the top 24 and research… The Board con- 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Karlin 1924—2007
    Sam Karlin 1924—2007 This paper was written by Richard Olshen (Stanford University) and Burton Singer (Princeton University). It is a synthesis of written and oral contributions from seven of Karlin's former PhD students, four close colleagues, all three of his children, his wife, Dorit, and with valuable organizational assistance from Rafe Mazzeo (Chair, Department of Mathematics, Stanford University.) The contributing former PhD students were: Krishna Athreya (Iowa State University) Amir Dembo (Stanford University) Marcus Feldman (Stanford University) Thomas Liggett (UCLA) Charles Micchelli (SUNY, Albany) Yosef Rinott (Hebrew University, Jerusalem) Burton Singer (Princeton University) The contributing close colleagues were: Kenneth Arrow (Stanford University) Douglas Brutlag (Stanford University) Allan Campbell (Stanford University) Richard Olshen (Stanford University) Sam Karlin's children: Kenneth Karlin Manuel Karlin Anna Karlin Sam's wife -- Dorit Professor Samuel Karlin made fundamental contributions to game theory, analysis, mathematical statistics, total positivity, probability and stochastic processes, mathematical economics, inventory theory, population genetics, bioinformatics and biomolecular sequence analysis. He was the author or coauthor of 10 books and over 450 published papers, and received many awards and honors for his work. He was famous for his work ethic and for guiding Ph.D. students, who numbered more than 70. To describe the collection of his students as astonishing in excellence and breadth is to understate the truth of the matter. It is easy to argue—and Sam Karlin participated in many a good argument—that he was the foremost teacher of advanced students in his fields of study in the 20th Century. 1 Karlin was born in Yonova, Poland on June 8, 1924, and died at Stanford, California on December 18, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting of the APS Forum on the History of Physics, Sunday, April 13, 2008, 1:00 PM – 5:20 PM, Directors Row 23, Hyatt Regency St
    Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting of the APS Forum on the History of Physics, Sunday, April 13, 2008, 1:00 PM – 5:20 PM, Directors Row 23, Hyatt Regency St. Louis Riverfront Hotel in St. Louis, Missouri. (The minutes of the annual Business Meeting of the FHP is at the end of this report.) Present: William E. Evenson (Chair), David C. Cassidy (Chair-Elect), Virginia Trimble (Past-Chair), Roger H. Stuewer (APS Councillor), Michael Riordan (Newsletter Editor), and Members-at-Large J. David Jackson, Paul Halpern, Peter Pesic, George O. Zimmerman. Newly-elected participants, with terms beginning at the close of the April meeting: Robert G. Arns, Daniel Kleppner. Visitors (for various times throughout the meeting): Alan Chodos, Amy Flatten, Judy Franz, Clayton Gearhart, Don Howard, Ed Neuenschwander, John S. Rigden, Joe Serene, Gene Sprouse. Gloria B. Lubkin (Vice-Chair) joined the meeting on speakerphone. Thomas Miller (Secretary-Treasurer) was unable to attend; Paul Halpern recorded the minutes for the meeting. 1. Opening: Following lunch, Bill Evenson opened the meeting at 1:20 PM, welcomed participants and made introductions. 2. Presentations by APS Visitors: Gene Sprouse, APS Editor-in-Chief, reported that APS journals continue to grow. He mentioned several new features including “Editor’s Suggestions” (2 or 3 papers chosen each week for special interest), “Milestone Letters” (especially significant papers from each year of Physical Review Letters dating back to 1958), a project to show the names of Asian authors in their own language characters along with the English transliteration, a project to recognize outstanding referees, and a new online service called “Physical Review Select,” in which experts write introductory pieces about articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Biology an Overview of the Debates
    SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY PROJECT / SYNBIO 3 SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY Ethical Issuesin SYNBIO 3/JUNE2009 An overview ofthedebates Contents Preface 3 Executive Summary 4 Who is doing what, where are they doing it and how is this current work funded? 6 How distinct is synthetic biology from other emerging areas of scientific and technological innovation? 9 Ethics: What harms and benefits are associated with synthetic biology? 12 The pro-actionary and pre-cautionary frameworks 18 N OVERVIEW OF THE DEBATES N OVERVIEW OF A Competing—and potentially complementary—views about non-physical harms (harms to well-being) 23 The most contested harms to well-being 25 Conclusion: Moving the debate forward 26 References 29 ETHICAL ISSUES IN SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY: ETHICAL ISSUES IN SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY: ii The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views Sloan Foundation. Wilson International Center for Scholars or the Alfred P. of the Woodrow Ethical Issues in SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY An overview of the debates Erik Parens, Josephine Johnston, and Jacob Moses The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York SYNBIO 3 / JUNE 2009 2 ETHICAL ISSUES IN SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY: AN OVERVIEW OF THE DEBATES Preface Synthetic biology will allow scientists and where such topics are divided into two broad engineers to create biological systems categories: concerns about physical and non- that do not occur naturally as well as to physical harms. While physical harms often re-engineer existing biological systems to trigger debates about how to proceed among perform novel and beneficial tasks. This researchers, policymakers, and the public, emerging field presents a number of non-physical harms present more difficult opportunities to address ethical issues early conundrums.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems and Control Theoretic Approaches to Engineer Robust
    Systems and Control Theoretic Approaches to Engineer Robust Biological Systems by Yili Qian Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2020 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author................................................................ Department of Mechanical Engineering August 7, 2020 Certified by. Domitilla Del Vecchio Professor of Mechanical Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Nicolas G. Hadjiconstantinou Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Theses 2 Systems and Control Theoretic Approaches to Engineer Robust Biological Systems by Yili Qian Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on August 7, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract Synthetic biology is an emerging field of research aimed to engineer biological systems by inserting programmed DNA molecules into living cells. These DNAs encode the production and subsequent interactions of biomolecules that allow the cells to have novel sensing, computing, and actuation capabilities. However, most success stories to date rely heavily on trial and error. This is mainly because genetic systems are context-dependent: the expression level of a synthetic gene often depends not only on its own regulatory inputs, but also on the expression of other supposedly unconnected genes. This lack of modularity leads to unexpected behaviors when multiple genetic subsystems are composed together, making it difficult to engineer complex systems that function predictably and robustly in practice. This thesis characterizes resource competition as a form of context dependence, and presents control theoretic approaches to engineer robust, context-independent gene networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Biology in the United States a Brief History of an Emerging Innovation System
    Synthetic Biology in the United States A Brief History of an Emerging Innovation System David Rejeski Global Fellow Wilson Center March 2016 Acknowledgments: I was lucky. I had a front seat during the development of a new field — synthetic biology. Not being a scientist, I had not expected those in the field to open their arms to a foreigner with obvious leanings towards the often maligned and un-scientific field of public policy. But it happened. Dozens of people took the time to talk to me, in person or by phone, about their involvement in the field, their hopes, and their concerns. My special thanks to Paula Olsiewski of the Alfred P. Sloan foundation, who supported the Synthetic Biology Project, myself and my staff, at the Woodrow Wilson Center for eight years. Special thanks also to Drew Endy, who, like a magician pulling rabbits from a hat, seemed to have an endless library of important historical documents and photos he was willing to share. Tom Knight and Peter Carr reviewed early versions of the history section and provided valuable feedback. Thanks to my colleague at the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Leena Ilmola, who integrated me into the proposal for the Finnish Academy, an opportunity I would have certainly missed. This story is my construction and I take responsibility for the interpretation, including any errors or failures of inclusion. Maybe we can make it better. Dave Rejeski Washington, DC The research leading to these results has received funding from the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland under grant agreement no: 293446 - Platform Value Now: Value Capturing in the fast emerging platform ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Annual Report
    Cover and inside photos courtesy of the following: V.K. Vlasko-Vlasov, U. Welp (Argonne National Laboratory) and V. Metlushko (University of Illinois at Chicago); CERN; I.S. Aranson et al, Physical Review Letters 84, 3306 (2000); CDMS; RHIC and Brookhaven National Laboratory; Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 088302 (2001); A. Zehl, M. Yoshida, and D.T. Colbert; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; MIT; NASA Glenn Reseach Center. At the start of the year, the Executive Branch of the federal government was in the midst of transition. However, while the government almost appeared to slow to a halt during the transition, news of exciting physics research results continued unabated. During the APS March Meeting in Seattle, a marathon session was held on the new superconductor, magnesium diboride, while at the April Meeting in Washington, DC, excitement was high as the first reports of new precision measurements of the cosmic microwave background strongly supported the idea of an early inflationary universe. Other lead stories included the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) results confirming solar neutrino oscillations, the establishment of CP violation in B-meson decay, and the demonstration of bringing pulses of light to a standstill in such a way that all of the information that they contain is stored in atomic excitations and later recoverable. Heroic efforts by the APS Editorial Office staff throughout the year allowed the completion of the Physical Review On-line Archive, PROLA, so that every paper that APS has ever published is now on-line and readily accessible. Within PROLA, each paper is linked to previous papers to which it refers and also to subsequent papers that cite it.
    [Show full text]