RUSSIAN SUSTAINABILITY Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
05. Exploration in the Norwegian and Russian Arctic (ENG
23/01/2014 Exploration in the Russian and Norwegian Arctic Terje Dahl, VP Russian-Caspian exploration unit Copyright©Statoil January 2014 Arctic important for long term global energy supply Increasing global energy demand Significant resource potential Global oil demand Global gas demand ex bio fuels, mbd 1000 bcm International bunkers Other non-OECD countries Non-OECD Asia OECD Source: IEA (history), Statoil (projections) Source: USGS 2 1 23/01/2014 There is no one Arctic, but many Arctic regions Workable Arctic Stretch Arctic Extreme Arctic • Oil & gas activities • Requirement for • Requirement for radical possible with today’s incremental innovation innovation and technologies and technology technology development • For example Southern development • For example North East Barents Sea and East • For example North East Greenland Coast Canada Barents Sea 3 Long History of Exploring the Arctic Otto Sverdrup Georgy Sedov Mikhail Fridtjof Nansen Lomonosov Roald Amundsen Arthur Chilingarov 2 23/01/2014 Strong partnership with Rosneft • Offshore joint venture in the Russian Barents Sea and Sea of Okhotsk • Partners in offshore exploration license in the Norwegian Barents Sea • Pilot study on heavy-oil onshore asset in West Siberia • Signed shareholders and operating agreement for Domanik shale oil cooperation Photo: Courtesy of prime minister press office 5 Activities in the Norwegian-Russian Arctic Norwegian Barents Sea Production, development and exploration Perseevsky license block JV with Rosneft Kharyaga Partner in the Kharyaga PSA Moscow -
16-17 March 2016, Fairbanks, Alaska, U.S.A
Arctic Council SAO plenary meeting (eDocs code: ACSAOUS202) 16-17 March 2016, Fairbanks, Alaska, U.S.A. Document Title Overview of measures specifically designed to prevent oil pollution in the Arctic marine environment from offshore petroleum activities Agenda item number 7.1a Submitted by Norway Document filename EDOCS-3194-v1- ACSAOUS202_Fairbanks_2016_7-1a_Overview_Measures_OPP_Norway_report Number of pages, not including this cover sheet 266 Type (e.g. report, progress report, etc.) Report Proactima Stavanger Proactima Oslo Proactima Bergen Proactima Trondheim Postboks 8034 Postboks 2369 Solli Kong Christian Fredriks plass 3 Abelsgate 5 4068 Stavanger 0201 Oslo BI-bygget, 5006 Bergen 7030 Trondheim Norway Norway Norway Norway t: +47 40 00 19 33 – f: +47 51 87 57 41 – org. no. 915 641 938 – [email protected] – proactima.com REPORT Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (on behalf of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs) Overview of measures specifically designed to prevent oil pollution in the Arctic marine environment from offshore petroleum activities Arctic Council, Task Force On Pollution Prevention (TFOPP) Table of contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... -
Russian Energy Sector Import Substitution
A GRI SPECIAL REPORT RUSSIA'S ENERGY SECTOR: EVALUATING PROGRESS ON IMPORT SUBSTITUTION AND TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY KNOW YOUR WORLD APRIL 2018 WHO WE ARE Founders Emil Graesholm, Basim Al-Ahmadi, Evan Abrams, Sammy Halabi Editor in Chief Alisa Lockwood Managing Editors Wiliam Christou, Robyn Kelly-Meyrick Senior Editor for this edition Nicholas Trickett Contributors to this edition Maria Shagina Design Alisa Lockwood “We can count on GRI for commentary that is timely, relevant and insightful. They get behind the GLOBAL RISK headlines to provide thoughtful analysis on what is really going on and what it means.” INSIGHTS - Kerim Derhalli, CEO & Founder of Invstr, Former Head of Equity Trading at Deutsche Bank Political RIsk for the 21st Century CONTENTS Introduction • p3 Impact of sanctions in the energy sector • p4 Joint projects cancelled or delayed due to sanctions • p5 Russia's dependence on foreign technologies • p6 Pivot to Asian technology • p7 Russia's strategy for import substitution • p9 Homegrown technology • p11 Success of import substitution? • p13 Four reasons to be skeptical • p16 About the authors • p17 INTRODUCTION 3 YEARS OF IMPORT SUBSTITUTION: WHAT NOW? Russia represents a large import After three years, the success of the market for oil and gas field equipment. import substitution programme is The country is the 6th largest mixed. equipment importer in the world and its market amounts to $25 billion Although some companies succeeded in annually. developing homegrown technologies, equipment for deepwater, Arctic Before 2014, Germany and Italy were offshore and shale exploration has not Russia’s main EU sources for oil and been produced. gas equipment, taking 16% and 11% of Russia’s market respectively. -
The Future of Energy and the Case of the Arctic Offshore: the Role of Strategic Management
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article The Future of Energy and the Case of the Arctic Offshore: The Role of Strategic Management Elias G. Carayannis 1, Alina Ilinova 2,* and Alexey Cherepovitsyn 2 1 School of Business, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; [email protected] 2 Organization and Management Department, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint-Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-921-349-3472 Abstract: As risk and uncertainty factors have become more prominent in the already volatile energy market because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of Arctic hydrocarbon resources has become a debatable issue. At any rate, oil and gas companies need to improve their strategic manage- ment systems (along with the development of technologies) for the successful implementation of such complex projects. The purpose of this study was to propose the conceptual basis for transforming strategic management and planning systems of oil and gas companies so that they can successfully face global challenges when implementing offshore oil and gas projects in the Arctic as well as provide more sustainable energy sources. The article discusses the current situation with Arctic initiatives and the results of an analysis of price instability in the energy sector, along with an analysis of several megatrends affecting oil and gas companies. All this allows for presenting a conceptual vision of how a strategic management system should be transformed in order to become able to meet the requirements for implementing Arctic projects, with the emphasis being placed on sustainability, management requirements, and the key principles. -
Russia's Northern Fleet and the Oil Industry – Rivals Or Partners
Russia’s Northern Fleet and the Oil Industry – Rivals or Partners? Petroleum, Security and Civil-Military Relations in the Post-Cold War European Arctic Kristian Åtland Described as one of the world’s most promising new energy provinces, the European Arctic is no longer seen primarily as a military playground. Russia’s approach to the region is increasingly governed by national economic interests, rather than by national security interests. The development of offshore oil and gas fields, the construction of new pipelines and terminals, the increasing traffic of oil tankers to Western Europe and the United States, and the conversion of naval yards to civilian production, represent both new challenges and new opportunities for the Russian Navy. Issues that were previously considered crucial to the country’s national security have slowly but steadily been “desecuritized”, and new patterns of civil- military relations have emerged. This article discusses the relationship between the Russian petroleum industry and the Northern Fleet, and the interplay between Russian commercial and military interests in the post-Cold War European Arctic. Twenty years ago, the European Arctic1 was among the most heavily militarized regions of the world. The fiords on the northern coast of the Kola Peninsula were full of naval bases, and Soviet nuclear submarines were frequently operating in the frigid waters of the Barents Sea. The level of tension on NATO’s northern flank was high, and this was reflected in the position of the Soviet Northern Fleet. Civilian activities in and by the Barents Sea were severely restricted, and Soviet politics on the Arctic were largely governed by military-strategic interests and national security concerns. -
Changes in Glacier Extent on North Novaya Zemlya in the Twentieth Century Jaapjan Zeeberg and Steven L
The Holocene 11,2 (2001) pp. 161–175 Changes in glacier extent on north Novaya Zemlya in the twentieth century JaapJan Zeeberg and Steven L. Forman (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (M/C 186), University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 W Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607–7059, USA) Received 4 February 2000; revised manuscript accepted 4 April 2000 Abstract: Glacier retreat on north Novaya Zemlya for the past century was documented by registering glacier terminus positions from expedition and topographic maps and remotely sensed images. Recession of tidewater calving glaciers on north Novaya Zemlya in the first half of the twentieth century was relatively rapid (Ͼ300 myr−1), consistent with post-‘Little Ice Age’ warming documented by a 122-year instrumental record from Malye Karmakuly. The glaciers completed 75 to 100% of the net twentieth-century retreat by 1952. Between 1964 and 1993 half of the studied glaciers were stable; the remainder retreated modest distances of Ͻ2.5 km. This stability coincides with decreasing average temperatures, especially during the winter, which is counter to model prediction. There is a statistically significant covariance of unfiltered winter and summer temperatures from Novaya Zemlya and a smoothed 88-year record of SSTs in the southern Barents Sea (r Ͼ 0.75). Elevated SST in the Barents Sea appear to reflect increased advection of warm North Atlantic water associated with a positive North Atlantic Oscillation index (NAO). Winter temperatures are periodically correlated with the NAO (r = 0.75 to 0.9) reflecting repeated penetration of Atlantic cyclones into the Arctic. During the twentieth century, an overall positive glacier mass balance trend at Novaya Zemlya is associated with a positive phase of the NAO, elevated southern Barents Sea SST, and a concomitant increase of winter precipitation. -
Arctic Law & Policy Year in Review
Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy Volume 5 Issue 1 Arctic Special Edition 6-1-2015 Arctic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2014 Arctic Law & Policy Institute, University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjelp Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Law of the Sea Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons Recommended Citation Arctic Law & Policy Institute, University of Washington, Arctic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2014, 5 WASH. J. ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 97 (2015). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjelp/vol5/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Arctic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2014 Copyright © 2016 by Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy ARCTIC LAW & POLICY YEAR IN REVIEW: 2015 Arctic Law & Policy Institute, University of Washington* I. INTRODUCTION: ARCTIC NEWS HIGHLIGHTS ........... 73 II. TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ............................................................... 79 A. U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea ................... 79 B. U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change ... 80 C. International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships ................................................. 81 D. Arctic Council Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic............................................... 82 E. Arctic Council Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic ............................................................... 82 F. Declaration Concerning the Prevention of Unregulated High Seas Fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean ............................................................. -
Analyses of Key Companies Having Business Operations in the Arctic
Analyses of Key Companies having Business Operations in the Arctic Extract of the report Climate Change in the Arctic April 2017 1 Main companies from key sectors in the Arctic Table 4 List of main companies from key sectors in the Arctic Shell, conoco, bp, noble energy, transocean Sector Company Logo Oil & Gas (19) Mining (10) Fishery (7) Others (3) 2 Analyses of Key Companies having Business Operations in the Arctic A. Oil and Gas Sector Royal Dutch Shell Climate change or carbon emission Main business activities reduction related initiatives within in the Arctic and beyond the Arctic • Shell owns 27.5% interest in Sakha- • Shell ended the offshore exploration lin-2 on the Sakhalin Island (Russia), drilling operations in Alaska in an integrated oil and gas project locat- September 2015. ed in a subarctic environment. • Shell works with Wetlands Interna- • In 2015, Shell has made drillings for tional to identify and assess critical oil and gas at the Burger J well habitats in the Arctic regions, develop- in the Chukchi Sea (offshore Alaska, ing a tool that predicts the distribution US ), but the discoveries were of Arctic species; and ever since 2006, insufficient to warrant further explora- it has funded a science programme tion in the area and the well was with the local governments of the Royal Dutch Shell deemed a dry hole. The well was North Slope in Alaska. sealed and abandoned in accordance HQ: The Hague, Netherlands with US regulations. • Shell and IUCN have been work- ing together since 2004 to minimise Ticker: • Shell has 18 state leases in the Beau- the impact on Western gray whales RDS/A fort Harrison Bay area in Alaska at Shell’s jointventure operations in Market Cap (USD mil.): (US ). -
Self-Translation As Science-Art: Joseph Brodsky Legacy
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 2 (2014 7) 294-304 ~ ~ ~ УДК 81.33 Self-Translation as Science-Art: Joseph Brodsky Legacy Veronica A. Razumovskaya* Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russia Received 29.11.2013, received in revised form 20.12.2013, accepted 15.01.2014 The article deals with the issues of self-translator’s creativity which are considered in the context of the linguistic concepts of identity. When creating a secondary translated text self-translator’s efforts are directed towards the creation of a text which is culturally symmetrical to an original text. Effective strategies of translation in the situation of self-translation are self-commentary and self-editing. The Russian text of the series “Chast’ Rechi” and English self-translation “A Part of Speech” by Joseph Brodsky are research material. Keywords: self-translation, creativity, linguistic identity, self-commentary, self-editing, “A Part of Speech”, Joseph Brodsky. Introduction it necessary to draw attention to the definition of Translation has a centuries-old history translation as creative activity (Alekseyeva 2004: including a comparatively long period of theoretical 7; Solodub 2005: 5). Understanding of translation reasoning about translation-related issues. The as creative work does not refer to a certain kind diversity of views on the problems of translation of translation determined by the classification theory and practice has led to appearance of a basis being used, which makes creative work a considerable number of definitions reflecting the universal characteristic of any kind of translation constitutive features of translation: translation as a complex communicative activity. -
Arctic Cod in the Russian Arctic: New Data, with Notes on Intraspecific Forms
Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Arctic cod in the Russian arctic: new data, with notes on intraspecific forms Abstract Volume 7 Issue 1 - 2018 The Polar cod Boreogadus saida, from Siberian shelf is largely unstudied. Comparative N Chernova results are presented for the Barents, Pechora, Kara, Laptev and East-Siberian seas. Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (ZIN), Surveys included 325 bottom catches, 234 pelagic and 72 Sigs by trawls at 385 stations. It Universitetskaya Emb, Russia is quantitatively confirmed that B.saida dominates in arctic areas. The maximum length is 29.0cm and age 7+ (Laptev Sea). It prefers temperatures in the range -1.8 to +2.3°C. Polar Correspondence: N Chernova, Zoological Institute of Russian cod is represented by several intraspecific forms differing in proportions of body, size and Academy of Sciences (ZIN), Universitetskaya Emb, Russia, Tel +7 position of fins and in coloration. It remains a mystery in what places the spawning of this 812 328 0612, Fax +7 812 328 2941, Email fish occurs in the Arctic. A hypothesis is proposed thatB.saida spawns in a system of winter quasi stationary polynya which may extend from the White Sea to the Chukchi Sea along Received: December 22, 2017 | Published: January 29, 2018 the edge of fast ice. The local regimes of their functioning create the preconditions for existing of a number of stocks or populations within circumpolar range. Keywords: polar cod: Boreogadussaida, dominant species, arctic, barents sea, kara sea, laptev sea, east-siberian sea, intraspecific forms, polynyas, spawning Introduction EN2, EN3 below), the Laptev Sea (areas O, L, AN) and the East- Siberian Sea (part of the AN area). -
Pagophila Eburnea Populations
J. Avian Biol. 41: 532Á542, 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.05125.x # 2010 The Authors. J. Compilation # 2010 J. Avian Biol. Received 19 January 2010, accepted 13 April 2010 Post-breeding movements of northeast Atlantic ivory gull Pagophila eburnea populations Olivier Gilg, Hallvard Strøm, Adrian Aebischer, Maria V. Gavrilo, Andrei E. Volkov, Cecilie Miljeteig and Brigitte Sabard O. Gilg ([email protected]), Dept of Biol. and Environm. Sci., Div. of Pop. Biol., PO Box 65, FIÁ00014 Univ. of Helsinki, Finland. Present address for OG: Univ. de Bourgogne, Lab Bioge´osciences, UMR CNRS 5561, Equipe Ecol. Evol., 6 Boulevard Gabriel, FRÁ21000 Dijon, France. Á H. Strøm and C. Miljeteig, Norwegian Polar Inst., Polar Environm. Centre, NOÁ9296 Tromsø, Norway. Á Present address of CM: Norwegian Univ. of Sci. and Techn., NOÁ7491 Trondheim, Norway. Á A. Aebischer, Muse´e d’Histoire Naturelle de Fribourg, Chemin du Muse´e6,CHÁ1700 Fribourg, Switzerland. Á M. V. Gavrilo, Arctic and Antarctic Research Inst. (AARI), 38 Bering Street, RUÁ199397 Saint- Petersburg, Russia. Á A. E. Volkov, Fund for Sustainable Development, PO Box 85, RUÁ117312 Moscow, Russia. Á B. Sabard, Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique (GREA), 16 rue de Vernot, FRÁ21440 Francheville, France. The post-breeding movements of three northeast Atlantic populations (north Greenland, Svalbard and Franz Josef Land) of the ivory gull Pagophila eburnea, a threatened high-Arctic sea-ice specialist, were studied between July and December 2007 using 31 satellite transmitters. After leaving their breeding grounds, all birds first dispersed eastward in AugustÁ September, to an area extending from the Fram Strait to the northwestern Laptev Sea (off Severnaya Zemlya). -
Cluster Development of the Barents and Kara Seas Oil and Gas Fields
ABSTRACT Russian Arctic region is extremely rich of hydrocarbon resources. Most of them are located in 2 giant seas: Kara Sea and Barents Sea. Drilling for oil or gas in harsh areas such as arctic or ultra-deep waters is a dangerous, high-risk enterprise and an oil spill or a gas leak under these waters would have a catastrophic impact on one of the most unique and beautiful landscapes on earth. Nowadays the risks of that accident are present and the oil industry requires new solutions to such challenges. The Barents Sea is well-known for its promising fields like Shtokman and Prirazlomnoye. The Prirazlomnoye field is developed now. Moreover, there are other fields located near to shelf or far from shelf (Map 1). The Barents Sea region is thought to play a key role in Russian and Norwegian oil and gas field development and hydrocarbon resources production. Both countries are moving petroleum activities into the Barents Sea due to the high potential of hydrocarbon occurrence. Another area is the Kara Sea and it is now under active exploration. The Kara Sea compared to the Barents Sea is harder to explore and develop because of tremendous ice cover, icebergs and severe meteorological conditions. An example of a field that was explored and developed in this area is the Universitetskoye field. The first well in this field was drilled and the first oil was produced. However, nowadays exploration of that field has been suspended. There are also other fields located in this region (Map 1). Map 1 Oil and gas potential of the Barents-Kara region (Source: Onepetro’s thesis [34]) Page i These areas are divided between two Russian major companies – Gazprom and Rosneft.