Teacher Unions?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Teacher Unions? HOW STRONG ARE U.S. TEACHER UNIONS? A STATE-BY-STATE BY AMBER M. WINKLER, JANIE SCULL, COMPARISON & DARA ZEEHANDELAAR FOREWORD BY CHESTER E. FINN, JR. AND MICHAEL J. PETRILLI OCTOBER 2012 CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 15 Background ........................................................................................................................................................20 Part I: Evaluating Teacher Union Strength ..............................................................................................22 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 26 Part II: Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 32 America’s Strongest Teacher Unions ................................................................................................ 36 America’s Weakest Teacher Unions .................................................................................................... 41 Part III: Taking a Closer Look—Teacher Union Influence by Area ..................................................44 Area 1: Resources and Membership ...................................................................................................44 Area 2: Involvement in Politics ............................................................................................................ 45 Area 3: Scope of Bargaining ................................................................................................................. 48 Area 4: State Policies ..............................................................................................................................49 Area 5: Perceived Influence ..................................................................................................................50 Part IV: Conclusions and Takeaways ......................................................................................................... 53 Part V: State Profiles .......................................................................................................................................60 Alabama ........................................................................................................................................................ 61 a Alask ............................................................................................................................................................ 67 Arizona...........................................................................................................................................................73 Arkansas ....................................................................................................................................................... 79 California ...................................................................................................................................................... 85 Colorado ........................................................................................................................................................ 91 Connecticut ................................................................................................................................................. 97 Delaware .....................................................................................................................................................103 District of Columbia ............................................................................................................................... 109 Florida ...........................................................................................................................................................115 Georgia .........................................................................................................................................................121 Hawaii ........................................................................................................................................................... 127 . Idaho ............................................................................................................................................................133 Illinois............................................................................................................................................................139 Indiana .........................................................................................................................................................145 Iowa ................................................................................................................................................................151 Kansas .......................................................................................................................................................... 157 Kentucky .....................................................................................................................................................163 Louisiana .....................................................................................................................................................169 Maine ............................................................................................................................................................ 175 Maryland .......................................................................................................................................................181 Massachusetts ...........................................................................................................................................187 Michigan ......................................................................................................................................................193 Minnesota ...................................................................................................................................................199 Mississippi ..................................................................................................................................................205 Missouri .........................................................................................................................................................211 Montana .......................................................................................................................................................217 Nebraska ....................................................................................................................................................223 Nevada ........................................................................................................................................................229 New Hampshire .......................................................................................................................................235 New Jersey .................................................................................................................................................241 New Mexico ...............................................................................................................................................247 New York ....................................................................................................................................................253 North Carolina ..........................................................................................................................................259 North Dakota ............................................................................................................................................265 Ohio ..............................................................................................................................................................271 Oklahoma ................................................................................................................................................... 277 Oregon ........................................................................................................................................................283 Pennsylvania .............................................................................................................................................289 Rhode Island .............................................................................................................................................295 South Carolina ..........................................................................................................................................301 South Dakota ............................................................................................................................................307 Tennessee ...................................................................................................................................................313
Recommended publications
  • Adobe Photoshop
    ~ UFT United Federation of Teachers A Union of Professionals February 2011 Dear UFf Members, When was the last time you attended a truly fulfilling and inspirational professional development session? When was the last time you attended one alongside 10,000 colleagues in the education world, from all 50 states and beyond? Ifyou've been to the Celebration ofTeaching & Learning, held annually in New York City over the past five years, we hope you've experienced the profound impact that such an experience can have on your role as a professional educator. UFT has been proud to sponsor this conference from the beginning because ofthe value we believe it brings our members, particularly through collaboration. At the Celebration, it's not unusual for a Kindergarten teacher and a chiefstate school officer to be sitting together in a plenary session, or to have a middle school principal and an Advanced Placement physics teacher listening to the same panel discussion. The Celebration is a conference designed to honor the teaching profession and to provide opportunities for renewing passion and creativity. It offers plenty of practical workshops - how to use a SMART board, for example, or a session on math for English Language Learners - but there are also sessions that offer more than the standard fare. How often does a teacher interested in adolescent literacy get to sit in a session not only with the acclaimed author Walter Dean Myers, but with Mr. Myers and the teenager who has just co-authored a new novel with him? What might it mean for a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Basil Paterson Recalled As Wise Man of Labor - the Chief: Ne
    Basil Paterson Recalled As Wise Man of Labor - The Chief: Ne... http://thechiefleader.com/news/news_of_the_week/basil-paterso... Basil Paterson Recalled As Wise Man of Labor By RICHARD STEIER | Posted: Monday, April 21, 2014 5:15 pm Basil A. Paterson, perhaps best known as a powerhouse in Harlem politics whose son David became New York’s first black Governor, was remembered following his death at 87 April 17 by union leaders as a mentor and bargaining counsel who combined wisdom and calm to great advantage. “Basil Paterson was the rare individual who knew how to talk to people, he knew what to say to people and he also knew when to say it,” said Teamsters Local 237 President Gregory Floyd. ‘Taught Us So Much’ American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, who retained Mr. Paterson as outside labor counsel for the United Federation of Teachers upon becoming its president in 1997 and continued to seek his advice when she moved on to the AFT 12 years later, described him as “always being a consigliere in the truest sense of the word.” Referring to her counterpart at the city’s giant health-care union, Local 1199 of the Service Employees International Union, she said, “Both George Gresham and I always say he taught us so much.” One of the most potent arrows in Mr. Paterson’s quiver was his sense of diplomacy. In 2006, he was thrust into a difficult spot when, following a three-day transit strike the previous December, the rank and file of Transport Workers Union Local 100 voted down the wage contract that ended the walkout by just seven votes out of more than 22,000 cast.
    [Show full text]
  • Semifinalists to Face Off for Beef Loving Texans' Best Butcher in Texas
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Sarah Flores, Hahn Public for Texas Beef Council 512-344-2045 [email protected] SEMIFINALISTS TO FACE OFF FOR BEEF LOVING TEXANS’ BEST BUTCHER IN TEXAS Texas Beef Council Selects Competitors to Battle for Coveted Finalist Spots AUSTIN, Texas – Feb. 23, 2017 –Texas Beef Council announces the top Semifinalists who will move on to compete in the Beef Loving Texans’ Best Butcher in Texas regional competition. The challenge, which pits butchers from across Texas against each other for the chance to win cash prizes and the esteemed title of Beef Loving Texans’ Best Butcher in Texas, has brought some of the state’s most talented butchers together – representing an art form that has been important to Texas’ cultural heritage. Regional semifinal rounds will be held throughout the state in Houston on March 4, Dallas on March 18 and San Antonio on April 1. In each city, Semifinalists will partake in a three-part challenge, which tests competitors on cut identification, along with their skills to cut to order and cut beef for retail merchandising. Each competitor will be equipped with Victorinox Swiss Army boning knives, a breaking knife, a cut resistant glove, a steel and a knife roll, to ensure everyone starts on an even playing field. Competitors will receive top marks based on their technique, creativity, presentation and consumer interaction. With culinary influencer/personality Jess Pryles emceeing, top industry professionals and culinary experts will weigh in in each region to determine the top three competitors who will move on to the final round at the Austin Food + Wine Festival on April 29.
    [Show full text]
  • From Essft.Com 2009 ESS Fall Field Trial Placements
    Kennels, Pros and Breeders For Sale Field Trial Dates Home Page 2009 Nationals High Point Page from essft.com 2009 ESS Fall Field Trial Placements Click Here to go to Placements (below) Click Here to view Spring 2009 Placements Click Here to view past placements New Supporter! Catskills * Denotes that the results are included in the High Point listing as of 11/17/2009 West Rocky Mountain Midwest Mid East East * Stockton * N Dakota Fri * N Minnesota * Western New * Maine * Utah * N Dakota * Tilden Valley York * Centra l * W Sat/Sun * NE Wisconsin * Susqueh anna Maine Washington * Rocky Mt n * Fox Valley * Pittsburgh * Patrio t * Northwest * Poudre Valle y * MN * S Michigan * Southern * Inland * N Colorado Heartland * Great Lakes Tier Empire * Kansas * St Croix * Mid-Penn * Long Is land * NE Oklaho ma * Sportsmen 's * Cincinnati * Cocker Club * Platte River * Central Wis * Ravenna * New Jersey * E Nebraska * Central * Ohio Valle y * Central Conn * Missouri States * Stillwater Vall ey * Keystone * SE Texas * Minneso ta Valley Forge *Houston * Illinois * ESSFTA * S Wiscons in * LASHA * E Central * Bushy Hi ll Iowa Canadian National National Cocker Champio nship National Open Championship National Amateur Championshi p Canadian Placements If the trial name is not underlined we have not yet received placements. Please have your club's FT secretary send them to [email protected] Thank you to our banner advertisers! Absolute Gun Dogs - Dan Murray Berretta - Official Sponsor of the 2008 NAC Gun Team Blue Pheasant Kennels - Lynn Miller Catskill Kennels
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Teachers Against Austerity
    What Makes Hope Possible A Book Review of Strike for America: Chicago Teachers Against Austerity Review by Amy B. Shuffelton (Loyola University Chicago) trike for America is an informative account of the skeptical of the David- and- Goliath narrative will note that 2012 Chicago teacher’s strike. In this concise and Uetricht’s sources confirm rather than complicate his account, but thought- provoking book, Uetricht (2014) told the story those inclined to say that this was a case of David nailing Goliath of the strike’s genesis, its motivations, its dynamics, and its (short- will appreciate his explanation of how David pulled it off. term,S of course) effects on the city of Chicago. Uetricht’s political Uetricht’s (2014) story began with the political organizing that commitments are explicit throughout. The story as he told it is of an made the strike possible, and throughout the book he emphasized embattled and misused sector of the working class standing up for the implications of this for those committed to democratic change. itself to the neoliberal interests that dominate Chicago politics. The Before the CTU closed down CPS for seven days in September Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) rallied around a commitment to 2012, the Caucus of Rank and File Educators (CORE), elected to equitable funding for schools and to fair working conditions for union leadership in 2010, had dedicated years to coalition building. teachers, in the face of collaboration between political and business As Uetricht reported, the strike came as something of a surprise. interests to shift massive amounts of money to private enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • The History Books Tell It? Collective Bargaining in Higher Education in the 1940S
    Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy Volume 9 Creating Solutions in Challenging Times Article 3 December 2017 The iH story Books Tell It? Collective Bargaining in Higher Education in the 1940s William A. Herbert Hunter College, City University of New York, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/jcba Part of the Collective Bargaining Commons, Higher Education Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Labor History Commons, Legal Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Herbert, William A. (2017) "The iH story Books Tell It? Collective Bargaining in Higher Education in the 1940s," Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy: Vol. 9 , Article 3. Available at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/jcba/vol9/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy by an authorized editor of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The iH story Books Tell It? Collective Bargaining in Higher Education in the 1940s Cover Page Footnote The er search for this article was funded, in part, by a grant from the Professional Staff onC gress-City University of New York Research Award Program. Mr. Herbert wishes to express his appreciation to Tim Cain for directing him to archival material at Howard University, and to Hunter College Roosevelt Scholar Allison Stillerman for her assistance with the article. He would also like to thank the staff ta the following institutions for their prompt and professional assistance: New York State Library and Archives; Tamiment Library and Robert F.
    [Show full text]
  • Boys Lacrosse, Girls Lacrosse and Girls Soccer at All Times
    OVERVIEW OF IMPORTANT RETURN-TO-PLAY TOPICS This document was updated on March 24, 2021. Over time, this document will change. Please check back frequently for updates. The first four pages of this document feature easy-to-understand overviews of Spring 2020-21 COVID-docu- ment-related guidelines. For more detailed answers, read this entire packet. Spring athletics will not be risk-free, but by following the guidance in this document, we all can help mitigate those risks. You should also consider your interactions outside of sports during this season in order to limit the potential for exposure in other portions of your daily routine. PROTOCOL FOR POSITIVE CASES: A detailed and more complete version of these protocols can be found on page 4 of this document (“What to Do When Someone Gets Sick”). 1. Contact health department and follow guidance. 2. Close contacts MAY have to quarantine for 14 days; follow health department guidance. “Close contact” is de- fined as someone who was within six feet of an infected person for a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more over a 24-hour period, starting from two days before illness onset. 3. Notify all schools, families and officials involved without identifying the person involved. 4. Students, coaches, officials and others at the event but NOT in close contact should be closely monitored for symptoms and may not need testing. Follow health department guidance. 5. Clean the area. FACE MASKS: The March 2, 2021 order issued by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS), as amended, mandates that masks are to be worn during practice and competition for outdoor contact sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat to Public Education Now Centers on Massachusetts
    THREAT TO PUBLIC EDUCATION NOW CENTERS ON MASSACHUSETTS May 2016 Preface This document updates and expands on Threat from the Right, an MTA task force report issued in May 2013. During the intervening years, the threat to public education, organized labor and social justice has grown substantially. Massachusetts is now in the crosshairs, with the forces behind charter schools, privatization and other attacks on the public good coalescing on Beacon Hill and throughout the state. That is reflected in the title of the 2016 edition, Threat to Public Education Now Centers on Massachusetts. No one should doubt the danger of the challenges outlined in these pages or the intensity of the forces behind them, which are national in scope. Nevertheless, winning the many fights we face is well within the power of the MTA and our allies — parents, students and other members of communities across Massachusetts and the nation. Understanding our opponents is an important step, and this report is intended to help us move toward meaningful victories as we continue to organize, mobilize and build the power we need to realize the goals of our Strategic Action Plan. Contents Introduction Elements of the Charter Campaign The Massachusetts Alignment ......................................................................................................7 Great Schools Massachusetts.......................................................................................................9 Families for Excellent Schools ....................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • NB 103Web.Pdf
    RETIRED TEACHERS ASSOCIATION Elected Directors OF CHICAGO 2009 - 2010 2011 20 East Jackson Boulevard - Suite 1500 Veronica Chemers Nathaniel Blackman Chicago, IL 60604-2235 John W, Craig Roy Coleman http://www.RTAC.org Ruby J. Ford Robert V. Cunningham Raphael A. Juss Sharye Garmony-Miller email: [email protected] Rita M. Naughton John J. Garvey webmaster: [email protected] Vera M. Paul David T. Peterson News Bulletin Circulation: 10, 601 Louise Ponce Mary Sharon Reilly Executive Committee: Helen Wooten Richard Tryba VAUGHN J. BARBER, Ex-Officio Board Members President Past Presidents: STEVEN A. KAILES, Mae M. Hunter Ned L. McCray First Vice President Helen P. Johnson Edward A. O’Farrell MARCELLA L. MORRISON, Robert C. Konen Ethel Philpott Second Vice President Arthur R. Lehne Walter Pilditch JAMES F. WARD, Zygmunt K. Sokolnicki James F. Ward Secretary ARTHUR E. KEEGAN, Robert F. Bures, Executive Director Treasurer Rosemary Tirio, Editor ETHEL PHILPOTT, Annual Membership $30; Lifetime Membership $200; Immediate Past President Free from age 85 and up RTAC SERVICE DIRECTORY RTAC Office (HOURS: 10 AM to 3 p.m. school days)..............................................................312-939-3327 RTAC Fax Line...........................................................................................................................312-939-0145 CRTAF Aid Fund........................................................................................................................312-939-3364 Chicago Teachers Pension Fund (203 N LaSalle
    [Show full text]
  • State of Utah Federal Funds Commission Economic Risk Analysis
    State of Utah Federal Funds Commission Economic Risk Analysis Prepared by: Kevin D. Freeman, CFA Freeman Global Holdings, LLC January 2016 Copyright © 2016 Freeman Global Holdings, LLC The Utah Federal Funds Commission retains a non-exclusive but unrestricted and perpetual right to the use and ownership of this RISK ANALYSIS as outlined in the contract with Freeman Global Holdings, LLC ECONOMIC RISK ANALYSIS 3 Freeman Global Holdings, LLC THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ECONOMIC RISK ANALYSIS 1 Freeman Global Holdings, LLC PURPOSE The purpose of this effort was described as Risk Analysis in the contract and legislative language. Risk Analysis means an economic risk analysis that: a) Identifies the most likely and substantial risk that could cause the state of Utah to experience a reduction in the amount or value of federal funds it receives; b) Assesses, for each identified risk, the probability that the risk will actually occur; c) Assesses the direct and indirect impacts to the state of Utah, given the occurrence of each identified risk, including the amount or value of the reduction in the federal funds to the state; and d) Identifies and recommends methods that state can employ to avoid, minimize, and monitor the impacts of each identified risk. Please note that we have categorized risks by type and provided a subjective estimate of probability. The list is compiled based on judgment rather than modeling or other methods. This effort is not intended to be predictive as none of the risks identified may come to fruition. The purpose is, however, to identify potentially catastrophic risks and describe potential impacts with a cursory review of possible mitigation opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight for Democratic Education in Post-War New York
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 The Cold Culture Wars: The Fight for Democratic Education in Post-War New York Brandon C. Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Williams, Brandon C., "The Cold Culture Wars: The Fight for Democratic Education in Post-War New York" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6955. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6955 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Cold Culture Wars: The Fight for Democratic Education in Post-War New York Brandon C. Williams Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts & Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Elizabeth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D., Chair Ken-Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. James Siekmeier, Ph.D. Samuel Stack, Ph.D. Melissa Bingmann, Ph.D. Department of History Morgantown, WV 2015 Keywords: Democratic Education, Intercultural Education, Cold War, Civil Rights Copyright 2015 Brandon C.
    [Show full text]
  • Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels
    A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES WATCH THIS IMPORTANT VIDEO UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact MUST-SEE THE OCCULT REASON FOR PSYCHOPATHY Organic Portals: Aliens and Psychopaths KNOWLEDGE THROUGH GNOSIS Boris Mouravieff - GNOSIS IN THE BEGINNING ...1 The Gnostic core belief was a strong dualism: that the world of matter was deadening and inferior to a remote nonphysical home, to which an interior divine spark in most humans aspired to return after death. This led them to an absorption with the Jewish creation myths in Genesis, which they obsessively reinterpreted to formulate allegorical explanations of how humans ended up trapped in the world of matter. The basic Gnostic story, which varied in details from teacher to teacher, was this: In the beginning there was an unknowable, immaterial, and invisible God, sometimes called the Father of All and sometimes by other names. “He” was neither male nor female, and was composed of an implicitly finite amount of a living nonphysical substance. Surrounding this God was a great empty region called the Pleroma (the fullness). Beyond the Pleroma lay empty space. The God acted to fill the Pleroma through a series of emanations, a squeezing off of small portions of his/its nonphysical energetic divine material. In most accounts there are thirty emanations in fifteen complementary pairs, each getting slightly less of the divine material and therefore being slightly weaker. The emanations are called Aeons (eternities) and are mostly named personifications in Greek of abstract ideas.
    [Show full text]