A Giant Dapediid from the Late Triassic of Switzerland and Insights Into Neopterygian Phylogeny

Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch

Year: 2018

A giant dapediid from the Late Triassic of Switzerland and insights into neopterygian phylogeny

Latimer, Ashley E ; Giles, Sam

Abstract: A new Triassic neopterygian is described on the basis of a large three-dimensional neurocranium from the Rhaetian (Late Triassic) of the Ko¨ ssen Formation (Schesaplana, Grisons, Switzerland). CT scanning reveals neurocranial features similar to Dapedium, suggesting that this new genus, Scopulipiscis saxciput gen. et sp. nov., was deepbodied and potentially durophagous, although no associated dental material is known. An expanded phylogenetic analysis of actinopterygians resolves Dapediidae as a clade (inclusive of Tetragonolepis), although fails to recover any characters supporting the monophyly of the genus Dapedium. Dapediids are resolved as stem holosteans, filling a conspicuous gap in early neopterygian relationships. Pycnodonts, previously suggested as either stem teleosts or the sister group to dapediids, are resolved as a clade on the neopterygian stem. Similarities between the new taxon described here and Dapedium provide insights into morphological disparity within early members of the group— suggesting that the ecological expansion of dapediids originated prior to the End-Triassic extinction—as well as contributing to a growing understanding of endocranial anatomy in Palaeozoic and Early Mesozoic actinopterygians.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180497

Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-153643 Journal Article Published Version

The following work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.

Originally published at: Latimer, Ashley E; Giles, Sam (2018). A giant dapediid from the Late Triassic of Switzerland and insights into neopterygian phylogeny. Royal Society Open Science, 5:180497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180497 Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018 A giant dapediid from the Late Triassic of Switzerland rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org and insights into neopterygian phylogeny Research Cite this article: Latimer AE, Giles S. 2018 A Ashley E. Latimer1 and Sam Giles2 giant dapediid from the Late Triassic of 1 Switzerland and insights into Paleontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Zurich 8052, Switzerland 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK neopterygian phylogeny. R. Soc. open sci. 5: 180497. AEL, 0000-0002-2342-9796; SG, 0000-0001-9267-4392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180497 A new Triassic neopterygian is described on the basis of a large three-dimensional neurocranium from the Rhaetian (Late Triassic) of the Ko¨ssen Formation (Schesaplana, Grisons, Switzerland). CT scanning reveals neurocranial Received: 26 March 2018 features similar to Dapedium, suggesting that this new Accepted: 9 July 2018 genus, Scopulipiscis saxciput gen. et sp. nov., was deep- bodied and potentially durophagous, although no associated dental material is known. An expanded phylogenetic analysis of actinopterygians resolves Dapediidae as a clade (inclusive Subject Category: of Tetragonolepis), although fails to recover any characters supporting the monophyly of the genus Dapedium. Dapediids Biology (whole organism) are resolved as stem holosteans, filling a conspicuous gap in early neopterygian relationships. Pycnodonts, previously Subject Area: suggested as either stem teleosts or the sister group to evolution/taxonomy and systematics/ dapediids, are resolved as a clade on the neopterygian palaeontology stem. Similarities between the new taxon described here and Dapedium provide insights into morphological disparity Keywords: within early members of the group—suggesting that the Actinopterygii, CT scanning, holostei, durophagy, ecological expansion of dapediids originated prior to the End-Triassic extinction—as well as contributing to a growing neurocranium, inner ear understanding of endocranial anatomy in Palaeozoic and Early Mesozoic actinopterygians.

Author for correspondence: Sam Giles e-mail: [email protected] 1. Introduction Ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) constitute the majority of living vertebrate diversity, displaying a huge disparity of body forms filling a wide variety of ecological niches [1,2]. Almost all extant actinopterygians (more than 30 000 species) belong to a single group, the Teleostei, with non-teleostean actinopterygians comprising just 56 living species [3]. The distribution of extant species Electronic supplementary material is available belies past diversity: teleosts have not always been the dominant group, having reached their current status only after the end of online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare. c.4175978. & 2018 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

the Cretaceous [4,5]. Indeed, their sister group, the holosteans, outstripped teleosts in terms of diversity 2 and disparity in the earliest part of their history [5], although only eight species survive in the modern. rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org Despite this, the understanding of relationships among early holosteans remains poor, in particular with regard to taxa branching outside of the living radiation. A bare stem is typically recovered in most analyses (e.g. [6–9]), although a stem holostean identity has recently been suggested for Dapedium [10]. Representing an early experiment in body form and ecological diversity, Dapedium is a modestly diverse (approx. 20 species) radiation of neopterygians known from the Late Triassic (Rhaetian) to mid Jurassic (earliest Aalenian), most notable for its adaptations for durophagy. Members of this genus possess thick, interlocking ganoid scales; dense, pustular ornament; and a small mouth with styli- form teeth borne on the stout lower jaw. Other genera closely associated with Dapedium, and typically united into Dapediidae (or Dapediiformes), include Aetholepis [11], Dandya [12], Hemicalypterus [13,14],

Heterostrophus [15], Paradapedium [16], Sargodon [12] and Tetragonolepis [16,17], although the dapediid affi- sci. open Soc. R. nity of at least Heterostrophus and Dandya has been called into question [13,16]. Most Dapedium species have a standard length of around 15–35 cm [18], although dapediids range in size from approximately 8cm(Dapedium noricum [12]) to approximately 1 m (Sargodon tomicus [12]). Only around five of the 30 or so known species of dapediid are present in the Triassic, and are exclusively represented by isolated teeth 5

[19] or flattened [12,14,20] remains. Consequently, their adaptation for durophagy is thought to have 180497 : facilitated the group’s success in the aftermath of the End-Triassic extinction, a time at which many other durophagous taxa went extinct [21,22]. Despite representing an important expansion into a new ecological niche, the phylogenetic position of dapediids is unclear. Initially classed as ‘semionotids’ [12,23,24], a waste-basket taxon of primitive neopterygians, Dapedium was moved to Dapediidae by Lehman [25]. This family was erected largely on the basis of a deep-bodied phenotype [25–27], and a formal diagnosis was not provided until several dec- ades later ([28]: these authors note that a previous diagnosis, formulated by Wenz [26], was largely inaccurate). Dapediids are poorly sampled in formal phylogenetic analyses (but see [14]), typically being represented by a single, often composite, terminal [3,29–37]. Despite—or perhaps in consequence of—their limited phylogenetic consideration, dapediids have variably been considered stem teleosts [8,29–31,34,35,38–40], total group holosteans (generally sister to ginglymodians [10,12,13,18,36,37]), and, most recently, stem holosteans [10]. Historical difficulties in defining apomorphies for dapediids stem from a lack of diagnoses teamed with characters of dubious merit (such as the distribution of scale serrations and multicuspid teeth [11]) being used to distinguish between species, and the monophyly of Dapedium has previously been questioned [28]. Furthermore, material from the Sinemurian of Dorset is sorely in need of taxonomic revision, as has recently been carried out for German dapediid material [28,37,41]. Further uncertainty surrounds the identity of the sister taxon of dapediids. Close relationships have variably been found with pholidophorids þ leptolepids [29,34] and pachycormids [31], but most com- monly with pycnodonts [27,30,32,42]. Pycnodonts are a clade of deep-bodied neopterygians with heterodont dentition [43], and are themselves of uncertain phylogenetic affinity. They have traditionally been affiliated with teleosts [30,32,44,45], but as noted by Poyato-Ariza [46], these results largely rely on verbal argumentation or small character-by-taxon matrices. As such, they lack the quantitative rigour necessary to evaluate placement of pycnodonts relative to other neopterygians. Most analyses of neopterygian interrelationships exclude pycnodonts [6,8,10,14,32,33,47,48], probably due to their highly specialized morphology. Furthermore, detailed analyses of pycnodont interrelationships [44,49–51] rarely include robust sampling of non-pycnodont neopterygians, sometimes using just a single, hypothe- tical outgroup. The most inclusive analysis to date recovers a stem neopterygian position for pycnodonts [46], although this analysis codes a single, composite taxon and does not include dapediids. The equivocal phylogenetic signal of dapediids is in part due to the conflicting datasets used to resolve relationships. The phylogenetically informative endoskeleton [32,52,53], in particular the braincase, is described for only a small number of dapediids (Dapedium punctatum, D. caelatum [18]), and exhaustively in just a single taxon (Dapedium sp. [27,38,40,54,55]). While three-dimensional crania are known in a number of taxa (e.g. Tetragonolepis semicincta [17]; Dapedium granulatum [22], the majority of dapediids are preserved as laterally compressed fossils, with heavy dermal ornament obscuring most of the internal skeleton. In particular, no neurocrania are described from the Triassic, when the group first appeared. Here we present a new, large (approx. 17 cm length) braincase from the Rhaetian (Late Triassic) of the Ko¨ssen Formation (Schesaplana, Grisons, Switzerland; figure 1). Marine reptiles and pterosaurs have previously been described from this locality [56–58]. Actinopterygian remains attributed to Birgeria have been described from a lateral extension of the formation into Austria [59], but no dapediids have Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

3 Rhaetian rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org

L Norian

Triassic Carnian .Sc pnsci. open Soc. R.

Ladinian N M Anisian

0 50 100 km 5 180497 : E Olenekian Induan Figure 1. Map showing specimen locality (Schesaplana, white triangle) and putative age of deposit (Rhaetian). previously been identified. This new specimen expands our knowledge of the taxonomic richness of the locality and increases the size range known for dapediids, with implications for the diversification of the group and the timing of their radiation. Furthermore, CT scanning of this well-preserved neurocranium presents an opportunity to revisit the phylogenetic affinities of the group.

2. Material and methods 2.1. CT scanning PIMUZ (Paleontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Switzerland) A/I 3026 was scanned at EMPA (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Du¨bendorf, Switzerland) using a 300 kV micro-focus source (Finetec FOMR300.0) and flat-panel detector (Perkin-Elmer XRD 1621 AN14 ES, 200 mm pixels) at 100 mm resolution. VGStudio Max V2.2.5 and Mimics v.19 were used for digital segmentation, and meshes were exported into and imaged in Blender (blender.org). Scan data and three- dimensional surface files (.PLYs) are available on MorphoMuseuM (https://doi.org/10.18563/journal.m3.44).

2.2. Phylogenetic analysis Our dataset is based on Giles et al. [8], with 25 additional characters both novel and taken from the lit- erature [10,14,33,36,45,46,49]. Eighteen taxa were added to the matrix in order to increase the sampling of dapediids and investigate the relationship of pycnodonts to other neopterygians. Brachydegma caelatum was removed pending a redescription of this taxon. This gives a total of 291 characters and 110 taxa. Full details are given in the electronic supplementary material. An equally weighted parsimony analysis was conducted using a heuristic search in PAUP* v. 4.0a158 [60] with the following settings: 1000 random addition sequences, five trees held at each step, maxtrees set to automatically increase, nchuck ¼ 10 000, chuckscore ¼ 1, tree bisection and reconstruction strategy enabled. Seven characters (c.89, c.91, c.151, c.171, c.241, c.247, c.251) were ordered following Giles et al. [8]. Taxonomic equivalence [61] was assessed using Claddis [62]. The outgroup was constrained using the topology [Dicksonosteus [Entelognathus [Acanthodes, Cladodoides, Ozarcus][ingroup]]]. An agreement subtree was calculated in PAUP. Bootstrap values were calculated in PAUP with the following settings: 1000 replicates of a heuristic search, tree branching and reconstruction strategy enabled, 25 replicates, five trees held at each step, rearrlimit ¼ 50 000 000, limitperrep ¼ yes, nchuck ¼ 10 000, chuckscore ¼ 1. An optimization tree, showing all ambiguous character changes, was generated in MacClade ([63]; electronic supplementary material, Data S1). Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

(a)(b) 4 rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org .Sc pnsci. open Soc. R.

Figure 2. Photographs of the holotype of Scopulipiscis saxciput gen. et sp. nov. (PIMUZ A/I 3026). Specimen in dorsal (a), left lateral (b), ventral (c) and posterior (d) view. Scale bars are 50 mm.

3. Results 3.1. Systematic palaeontology Osteichthyes Huxley 1880 Actinopterygii Cope 1887 Holostei Mu¨ ller 1844 Dapediidae Lehman 1966 Scopulipiscis saxciput gen. et sp. nov.

3.1.1. Etymology

Generic name describes the marine deposits on the alpine cliff sides of Schesaplana Scopuli-fromscopulus (Latin)—meaning a lookout place, cliff or crag, in or under the sea-, piscis (Latin) for fish. In the specific epithet, sax- (Latin) is for ‘rock’ and -ciput from caput (Latin) for head because the holotype specimen PIMUZ A/I 3026 is a well-ossified neurocranium.

3.1.2. Holotype

PIMUZ A/I 3026 (figure 2), a neurocranium and associated dermal elements infilled by a fine carbonate matrix including small (approx. 2–8 mm) bivalves. Collected in 1976 by Dr Heinz Furrer, PIMUZ, the specimen was subsequently prepared mechanically.

3.1.3. Locality and horizon

The specimen was collected as float from the Ko¨ssen Formation of Schesaplana Mountain, in Canton Grisons/Graubu¨ nden, Switzerland (figure 1), in the lowest part of the Alplihorn Member, Late Triassic [56], where the boundary between the Late Norian and Early Rhaetian is currently undefined (Heinz Furrer 2016, personal communication). Actinopterygians from the same locality include fragmentary elements and teeth from Birgeria [64] and isolated elements in the collections at PIMUZ assigned to Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

(a)(b) 5 rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org

dpt dsp soc (c)(adf d) ioc sci. open Soc. R. derm

n.ov 5

na 180497 :

end

pa fr Figure 3. The skull roof of PIMUZ A/I 3026 in dorsal view. Rendering of entire specimen (a), dermal bone only (b) and position of preserved dermal bone (c). Interpretive drawing of skull roof (d). Dermal bone in dark grey, endochondral bone and matrix in light grey. Sensory canals in (d) in grey. Scale bar is 50 mm. adf, region of anterior dorsal fontanelle; derm, dermal bone; dpt, dermopterotic; dsp, dermosphenotic; end, endochondral bone; fr, frontal; ioc, infraorbital canal; na, nasal; n.ov, nasal overlap; pa, parietal; soc, supraorbital canal.

Sargodon and Lepidotes. The Austrian portion of the Ko¨ssen Formation has produced other fish remains [59]. Other taxa from Schesaplana include marine reptiles [56,58] and pterosaurs [57].

3.1.4. Diagnosis

Large neopterygian with a well-ossified neurocranium and the following combination of characters: spiracular canal extending through the postorbital process to open on the ventral surface of the braincase; elongate hyomandibular facet approximately one-fourth of neurocranial length; pronounced median occipital crest, large sinus between lateral cranial canals, parasphenoid keel extending dorsally between orbits.

3.2. Anatomical description 3.2.1. General

PIMUZ A/I 3026 preserves a partial skull roof and a near-complete neurocranium (17 cm preserved length), missing the nasal capsules and anterior portion of the orbit. There is some distortion, with the right orbit partially crushed and the basiocciput sheared slightly to the right. The skull roofing bones have also collapsed in the region of the anterior dorsal fontanelle. The complete ossification of the braincase and partial obliteration of dermal sutures suggests the cranium belonged to an adult specimen. Sutures between braincase ossifications are not apparent; the neurocranium appears to be ossified as a single unit. Some areas of perichondral bone were weathered away prior to collection, exposing cancellous bone, particularly in the occipital region and along the parasphenoid.

3.2.2. Skull roof

The dermal bones of the skull roof are heavily ornamented with pustular tubules, from 0.5 to 1 mm in diameter, radiating from ossification centres and increasing in size towards element margins (figures 2 and 3). The tubules are particularly large around the midline where the frontals and parietals meet. Such dense ornament means that sutures between bones are typically difficult to trace, although they Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

(a)(c) 6 rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org .Sc pnsci. open Soc. R.

(b)(soph d) pa bul fr pa adf soph2 endo cr soph 5 180497 : mcv fb lig soph2 sr dpt ptf por

otn focn otn ica fm V foca VII not tfc myo pv jug bpt aort psp pv pal opapsp Figure 4. The braincase of PIMUZ A/I 3026. Rendering (a) and interpretive drawing (b) of the cranium in anterior view, with the dermal skull roof digitally removed anterior to the postorbital process and the anterior corpus of the parasphenoid cropped. Rendering (c) and interpretive drawing (d) of the cranium in posterior view. Braincase and dermal bones in light grey, endocast and canals in red. Scale bar is 50 mm. adf, region of anterior dorsal fontanelle; aort, dorsal aorta; bpt, basipterygoid process; bul, bulge; cr, crest; dpt, dermopterotic; endo, endocavity; fb, fossa bridgei; fm, foramen magnum; foca, occipital artery; focn, occipital nerve; fr, frontal; ica, internal carotid; jug, jugular vein; lig, ligament pit; mcv, middle cerebral vein; myo, myodome; not, notochord; opa, ophthalmic artery; otn, otic nerve; pa, parietal; pal, palatine artery; por, postorbital process; psp, parasphenoid; ptf, post-temporal fossa; pv, pituitary vein; soph, supraophthalmic artery; sr, skull roof; tfc, trigeminofacialis chamber; V, trigeminal nerve; VII, facial nerve. can sometimes be followed in CT scans. The frontal is relatively short, accounting for a little under half the length of the skull roof (fr, figure 3d). It is widest anterior to the parietal contact, and tapers anteriorly. There is no pineal foramen, and the frontals appear to be fused at the midline. Only a small fragment of the left nasal is preserved, but an unornamented area at the anteriormost point of the left frontal represents the overlap area for this bone (n.ov, figure 3d). A series of pores marks the passage of the supraorbital sensory canal through the frontal and into the parietal (soc, figure 3d), and the path of the canal can be followed in CT sections. Very little of the midline suture is preserved between the elongate parietals (pa, figure 3d), which have partially collapsed into the anterior dorsal fontanelle (adf, figure 3c). The suture between the rectangular dermopterotic and parietal (dpt, figure 3d)is obscured by ornament externally, but can be traced in CT sections. However, it is unclear whether the dermopterotic contacts the frontal anteriorly. As with the supraorbital canal, the path of the otic sensory canal through the dermopterotic and into the dermosphenotic is indicated by a line of pores (ioc, figure 3d), with the canal visible in CT slices.

3.2.3. Braincase 3.2.3.1. Occipital region The occipital region is the deepest part of the braincase, with the basiocciput accounting for half the vertical height of the specimen (figures 4c,d and 5). It is narrower than either the otic or orbitotemporal Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

(a)(c) 7 rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org .Sc pnsci. open Soc. R. (b)(d) ioc adf pa dpt bul hmf dil dsp dil hmf bul otn ca soc fr ptf

pft 5

otn cr 180497 : por n.ov stf focn

X foca not psp X pal opa IXst bpt pal psp spic bpt ke psp IXst ke gr IX epsa por VIIfhm jug sup.ph sup.ph jug IX VIIfhm Figure 5. The braincase of PIMUZ A/I 3026. Rendering (a) and interpretive drawing (b) of cranium in right lateral view. Rendering (c) and interpretive drawing (d) of the cranium in left lateral view. Sensory canals in (d) in grey. Scale bar is 50 mm. adf, region of anterior dorsal fontanelle; bpt, basipterygoid process; bul, bulge; ca, canal; cr, crest; dil, dilatator facet; dpt, dermopterotic; dsp, dermosphenotic; epsa, efferent pseudobranchial; foca, occipital artery; focn, occipital nerve; fr, frontal; gr, groove; hmf, hyomandibular facet; ioc, infraorbital canal; jug, jugular vein; ke, keel; n.ov, nasal overlap; not, notochord; opa, ophthalmic artery; otn, otic nerve; pa, parietal; pal, palatine artery; por, postorbital process; psp, parasphenoid; ptf, post-temporal fossa; soc, supraorbital canal; spic, spiracular canal; stf, supratemporal fossa; sup.ph, suprapharyngobranchial articulation; VIIfhm, hyomandibular branch of the facial nerve; IX, glossopharyngeal nerve; IXst, supratemporal branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve; X, vagus nerve. regions (figure 6a,b). A ‘bulge’ on the midline projects dorsally above the skull roof (bul, figures 4d and 5b,d) and houses a large cavity within the perichondrium of the braincase (cav, figure 7a). The posterior face of the occiput is developed into a broad median occipital crest, punctuated by a large ligamentous pit (lig, figures 4d and 7a). A process lateral to this pit is pierced by small anastomosing branches for the occipital nerve (focn, figures 4d and 5d). Medial to the posterodorsal angle of the braincase is a deep post- temporal fossa (ptf, figures 4d and 5b,d), which is continuous anteriorly with the fossa bridgei (fb, figure 4d). The foramen magnum is small and triangular, and both its floor and roof are well-ossified (fm, figures 4d and 7a). Two foramina for the occipital arteries open onto the lateral face of the braincase just above the parasphenoid (foca, figures 4d and 5d), with the smaller opening for the occipital nerve dorsal to these (focn, figures 4d and 5d). The notochordal facet is large and rounded (not, figure 4d), and leads into a narrow notochordal canal that pinches out approximately halfway along the length of the basiocciput (not, figures 7a,b and 8b). Ventral to the opening for the notochord is the circular aortic canal, which is enclosed ventrally by the parasphenoid (aort, figures 4d,6b and 7a). A dorsally directed canal leaves the dorsal margin of the aorta to open on the lateral wall of the braincase above the parasphenoid. There is no indication of either a posterior dorsal fontanelle or otoccipital fissure.

3.2.3.2. Otic region The otic region is the widest part of the braincase (figure 6a,b). Much of its dorsal surface is unossified to accommodate the large anterior dorsal fontanelle, which extends from the posterior margin of the hyoid facet to above the orbits (adf, figures 3c,4b and 9b). Lateral to the fontanelle is an excavation for the fossa bridgei (fb, figures 8b and 9), which extends posteriorly to the post-temporal fossa and anteriorly to the Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

(a) (e) ica (c) 8 myo pbc rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org opa

?ica

pal anas epsa

spic sci. open Soc. R. (b) bpt (d) ica mcv IV soph IX VIIfhm endo IXst epsa III/Vprof soph2 psp ke

soph2 sr bhc 5 180497 : por aort gr v? X otn stf psp V pal hmf opa pal jug bpt pv dil frla por myo VII Figure 6. The braincase of PIMUZ A/I 3026. Rendering (a) and interpretive drawing (b) of the cranium in ventral view. Rendering (c) and interpretive drawing (d) of the cranium in left anterolateral view, with the dermal skull roof digitally removed anterior to the postorbital process. (e) Schematic drawing of the circulatory system in the basisphenoid and the parasphenoid in anterolateral view. The position of the entrance of the internal carotid in (e) is uncertain due to breakage. Braincase and dermal bones in light grey, endocast and canals in red. Scale bar is 50 mm. anas, anastomosis; aort, dorsal aorta; bhc, buccohypophyseal canal; bpt, basipterygoid process; dil, dilatator facet; endo, endocavity; epsa, efferent pseudobranchial; frla, recurrent lateralis branches of the facial nerve; gr, groove; hmf, hyomandibular facet; ica, internal carotid; jug, jugular vein; ke, keel; pal, palatine artery; mcv, middle cerebral vein; myo, myodome; opa, ophthalmic artery; otn, otic nerve; pbc, parabasal canal; por, postorbital process; psp, parasphenoid; pv, pituitary vein; soph, supraophthalmic artery; spic, spiracular canal; sr, skull roof; stf, supratemporal fossa; v?, unknown vein; III/ Vprof, oculomotor nerve and profundus branch of the trigeminal nerve; IV, trochlear nerve; V, trigeminal nerve; VII, facial nerve; VIIfhm, hyomandibular branch of the facial nerve; IX, glossopharyngeal nerve; IXst, supratemporal branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve; X, vagus nerve.

postorbital process. The lateral margin of the fossa bridgei is strongly concave, wrapping around the hyomandibular facet. The medial margin is convex, with multiple small projections giving an irregular edge. A total of five canals connect with the fossa bridgei. Two canals issue from its anteromedial corner. The more ventral, for the spiracular canal, enters the top of the postorbital process and travels along its entire length, opening just posterior to the lateral commissure on the ventral surface of the braincase (spic, figures 5b,6b and 9e). On the left side, the lateral commissure is broken, and consequently this canal appears to open midway along its length. The more dorsal of the two anteromedial canals opens into the posterolateral corner of the orbit, just below the orbital roof, and transmitted the otic nerve (otn, figures 4a,6b,d and 8b). An additional canal leaves more posteriorly from the medial margin and opens into the roof of the hyomandibular facet and may have transmitted the recurrent lateralis branch of the facial nerve (frla, figures 6b and 8b). Two narrow canals exit the anterolateral corner to open on the side of braincase just below the skull roof, and probably housed branches of the otic nerve (otn, figures 5b,d,8b and 9b,e). Dorsal to the fossa bridgei is a separate small cavity, which also lies within the perichondrium of the braincase. Owing to specimen preservation, the chamber is only fully observable on the right side. The chamber has a medial connection to the orbit, opening into the dorsolateral corner of the posterior wall (soph2, figure 4b). An additional small canal leaves the lateral margin of the chamber to open onto the lateral surface of the braincase dorsal to the otic nerve canals (ca, figure 5b). The articular facet for the hyomandibular is elongate and horizontally oriented (hmf, figures 5b,d and 6b), and a deep dilatator fossa lies dorsal to the hyoid articulation (dil, figures 5b,d and 6b). Ventral to the Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

p.f adf endo end.d cav 9 (a) fr rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org

n.ov

lig .Sc pnsci. open Soc. R.

psp fm

myo not 5 180497 : psp aort (b) psp (c) sacc X psp

not

fm foca myo Figure 7. CT slices through the braincase of PIMUZ A/I 3026. (a) Sagittal section through the midline. Transverse planes through the basioccipital (b) and floor of the orbit and basisphenoid (c). Scale bars are 50 mm for (a,c) and 20 mm for (b). adf, region of anterior dorsal fontanelle; aort, dorsal aorta; cav, cavity; endo, endocavity; end.d, endolymphatic duct; foca, occipital artery; fr, frontal; fm, foramen magnum; lig, ligament pit; myo, myodome; n.ov, nasal overlap; not, notochord; p.f, pituitary fossa; psp, parasphenoid; sacc, sacculus; X, vagus nerve. facet, the lateral wall of the braincase narrows towards the midline, and this face is pierced by a number of canals. The most posterior of these is the lenticular opening for the vagus nerve (X, figures 5b,d and 6b), positioned ventral to the posterior margin of the hyoid facet. A shallow depression between the vagus nerve and hyoid facet is the supratemporal fossa (stf, figures 5d and 6b), delimited anteriorly by a vertical strut. The glossopharyngeal nerve (probably its supratemporal branch) exits the braincase via a small canal at the base of this strut (IXst, figures 5b,d and 6b), adjacent to an elliptical pit. This pit appears to be at least partly the result of mechanical preparation, as it punches through the perichondrium to reach the saccular chamber on one side, but comparison of both sides shows that the perichondral lining of the endocavity is complete, and there is no vestibular fontanelle. The original morphology of the pit is unclear, but it may represent an articular facet for the first suprapharyngobranchial (sup.ph, figure 5). A shallow groove for the jugular marks the lateral face of the braincase anterior to this facet, and can be traced to a foramen in the lateral commissure ( jug, figures 5b,d and 6b). A large opening on the ventral margin of the jugular groove marks the exit of a stout canal, which originates on the lateral face of the sacculus near its anterior margin. This canal may be the main trunk of the glossopharyngeal nerve (IX, figures 5b,d and 6b). More anteriorly, a large opening for the hyomandibular branch of the facial nerve (VIIfhm, figures 5b,d and 6b) pierces the roof of the jugular groove. The jugular vein and main trunk of the facial nerve continue through the postorbital process into the orbit.

3.2.3.3. Orbitotemporal region The posterior margin of the orbitotemporal region is formed by the lateral commissure and postorbital process (por, figures 4b,5b,d and 6b,d). The lateral commissure is reduced to a thin splint laterally, and the extent to which it is covered by the ascending process of the parasphenoid is difficult to discern. The orbital walls are pierced by a complex anastomosing series of canals, some of which are difficult to identify. Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

(a) (b) 10 ha fb v? frla aa hsc rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org lcc otn IV optl mcv psc tel otn pa

I/Vprof focn

foca IXst sacc fm ica utr sci. open Soc. R. IX VI X spic V bhc myo pv VII VIIfhm not aort 5 180497 : (c)(d) lcc asc cc ssu

(e)(( f ) g)(h) pv spic can.bsp VII bhc pv opa ica

opa

myo myo pal bhc pal ica can.bsp bhc anas epsa epsa Figure 8. The endocast and cranial circulation of PIMUZ A/I 3026. Rendering (a) and interpretive drawing (b) of the endocast, fossa bridgei and lateral cranial canal in left lateral view, and with the fossa bridgei (c) and lateral cranial canal (d) digitally removed. Rendering (e,g) and interpretive drawing (f,h) of the basisphenoid and parasphenoid circulatory system in left lateral (e,f ) and ventral (g,h) view. Endocast in grey, canals in red. Scale bar is 50 mm. aa, anterior ampulla; anas, anastomosing canal; aort, dorsal aorta; asc, anterior semicircular canal; bhc, buccohypophyseal canal; can.bsp, unidentified canal in basisphenoid; cc, crus commune; epsa, efferent pseudobranchial; fb, fossa bridgei; foca, occipital artery; focn, occipital nerve; fm, foramen magnum; frla, recurrent lateralis branches of the facial nerve; ha, horizontal ampulla; hsc, horizontal semicircular canal; ica, internal carotid; lcc, lateral cranial canal; mcv, middle cerebral vein; myo, myodome; not, notochord; opa, ophthalmic artery; optl, optic lobe; otn, otic nerve; pa, posterior ampulla; pal, palatine artery; psc, posterior semicircular canal; pv, pituitary vein; sacc, sacculus; spic, spiracular canal; ssu, sinus superior; tel, telencephalon; utr, utriculus; v?, unknown vein; III/Vprof oculomotor nerve and profundus branch of the trigeminal nerve; IV, trochlear nerve; V, trigeminal nerve; VI, abducens nerve; VII, facial nerve; VIIfhm, hyomandibular branch of the facial nerve; IX, glossopharyngeal nerve; IXst, supratemporal branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve; X, vagus nerve.

These canals can roughly be separated into four groups: on the roof and posterolateral corner of the orbit; on the posteromedial corner of the orbit; on the medial wall of the orbit; and midway up the posterior orbital wall. Of the canals that open onto the roof of the orbit, around four to six transmit the superficial ophthalmic branches of the facial and trigeminal nerves dorsally through the braincase to Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

(a)(c) 11 rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org .Sc pnsci. open Soc. R. fb otn (b) lcc (d)(e) lcc cc sp psc optl asc psc fb otn pa 5 180497 : hsc adf otn fm v? spic otn X foca V focn ocn IXst oca VI sacc asc not x ssu cc IV aort Figure 9. The endocast of PIMUZ A/I 3026. Rendering (a) and interpretive drawing (b) of the endocast, fossa bridgei and lateral cranial canal in dorsal view. Rendering (c) and interpretive drawing (d) of the endocast, fossa bridgei and lateral cranial canal in posterior view. Endocast in grey, canals in red. Scale bar is 50 mm. adf, anterior dorsal fontanelle; aort, dorsal aorta; asc, anterior semicircular canal; cc, crus commune; fb, fossa bridgei; fm, foramen magnum; hsc, horizontal semicircular canal; lcc, lateral cranial canal; not, notochord; oca, occipital artery; ocn, occipital nerve; optl, optic lobe; otn, otic nerve; pa, posterior ampulla; psc, posterior semicircular canal; sp, spinal nerve cord; spic, spiracular canal; ssu, sinus superior; v?, unknown vein; IV, trochlear nerve; V, trigeminal nerve; VI, abducens nerve; IXst, supratemporal branch of glossopharyngeal nerve; X, vagus nerve. contact the visceral surface of the skull roof (soph, figures 4b and 6d). The two canals in the posterolateral corner of the orbit have different points of origin: the more ventral, for the otic nerve (otn, figures 4b,6d, 8b and 9b,e), connects to the fossa bridgei; and the more dorsal, which may also carry branches of the superficial ophthalmic (soph2, figures 4b and 6d), to the chamber that lies above the fossa bridgei. Of the two canals in the posteromedial corner of the orbit, the more anterior and dorsal carries the trochlear nerve from the optic lobes (IV, figures 6d,8b and 9b). The more posterior originates from the dorsal part of the midbrain, above and some way posterior to the trochlear nerve, but its identity is unclear (v?, figures 6d,8b and 9e). Two canals open on the medial wall of the orbit via a single foramen. These canals have a single root on the forebrain on the right of the specimen and a double root on the left, and transmitted the oculomotor and profundus nerves into the orbit (III and Vprof, figures 6d and 8b). The final set of canals, approximately midway up the posterior orbital wall, is centred about the trigeminofacialis chamber (tfc, figure 4b), which is continuous posteroventrally with the jugular canal. Two canals exit from the same point on the anterior face of the utriculus before separating into separate canals. These canals enter the orbit separately, but both are continuous within the trigeminofacialis chamber. The more dorsal transmits the trigeminal nerve (V, figures 4b,6d,8b and 9e) and the more ventral the facial nerve (VII, figures 4b,6d and 8b,f ). Two grooves extend from the dorsal margin of the chamber. The groove on the posterior margin of the orbit is short, with no canal at its dorsal limit. It ter- minates some way ventral and medial to any of the canals that connect to the skull roof, but may have transmitted the superficial ophthalmic nerves, which entered the orbit via the underlying chamber. The groove on the medial orbital wall is deeper, and a canal at its dorsal margin connects to the cranial cavity via two closely positioned openings. This probably transmitted the internal carotid artery (ica, figures 4b, 6d and 8d). A ventral connection links the trigeminofacialis chamber and the median posterior myodome (myo figures 4b,6d and 8b,f,h). The pituitary vein enters the orbit ventral to the trigeminofacialis chamber Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

(pv, figures 4b,6d and 8b,f,h). There is no obvious opening for the palatine branch of the facial nerve into 12 the orbit. rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org The braincase is broken midway along the orbit, and the skull roof has partially collapsed. A single opening on the midline represents where the braincase is broken through the endocranial cavity of the forebrain (endo, figures 4b and 6d); neither the exit of the optic (II) nor olfactory (I) nerve is preserved. The basisphenoid is well ossified, contributing to the medial walls and floor of the orbit, although the interorbital septum is formed entirely by the parasphenoid (psp, figures 4b,5d,6d and 7a). The basipterygoid process, which has both a dermal and endoskeletal component, is robust. The internal carotid opens into the posterior margin of the basisphenoid via a foramen anterior to the posterior myodome. The subocular shelf is narrow and formed entirely by the parasphenoid.

3.2.4. Parasphenoid sci. open Soc. R.

The parasphenoid extends the full length of the preserved braincase, although a fragment is missing in the middle where the specimen is broken between the midpoint of the basiocciput and the postorbital process. The posterior margin of the parasphenoid is weathered, exposing the basioccipital, but a midline aortic notch appears to have been absent (figures 4 and 6). Although housed entirely within the basioc- 5 180497 : ciput posteriorly, most of the floor of the aortic canal is formed by the parasphenoid (aort, figure 7a). As the parasphenoid is broken midway along the basiocciput, the nature of the bifurcation into the lateral aortae is unknown. A narrow median keel on the ventral surface of the parasphenoid (ke, figures 5b,d and 6b) is flanked by paired shallow grooves (gr, figures 5b and 6b); the depth of the left groove has been exaggerated during specimen preparation. As the dorsal and lateral aortae are enclosed within the braincase, the purpose of these grooves is unclear. The parasphenoid extends up the lateral walls of the braincase to the level of the foramen magnum, effectively cloaking the basiocciput. The ascending processes of the parasphenoid are narrow and strut-like, although it is difficult to assess how far they extend dorsally up the postorbital process. The basipterygoid processes are robust, projecting dorsally as well as laterally (bpt, figures 4b,5b,d and 6b,d), and the ophthalmic artery pierces the orbital floor posteromedial to the process (opa, figures 4b,5d and 6d,e). An opening at the anterior limit of the basipterygoid process marks the exit of the palatine nerve and artery from the basisphenoid (pal, figures 4b,5b,d and 6b,d,e). A V-shaped ridge is present on the ventral surface of the parasphenoid, and the efferent pseudobranchial artery exits posterior to where the two arms of the ridge converge on the midline (epsa, figures 5d and 6b,e). Anteriorly, the buccohypophyseal canal exits the parapshenoid on the midline (bhc, figure 6b). The internal carotid foramen is not preserved, and presumably entered the parasphenoid through the missing section. A broad parasphenoid keel extends dorsally between the orbits, forming the interorbital septum (psp, figures 4b,5d,6d and 7a). No teeth are present on the parasphenoid.

3.2.5. Endocast

The regions of the endocranial cavity corresponding to the midbrain, hindbrain and bony labyrinth are almost completely preserved, although only a short portion corresponding to the narrow forebrain is present in the specimen (tel, figure 8). As the internal walls of the braincase are sometimes poorly miner- alized (figure 7a), contrast between the braincase and infilling sediment is low, with the exact boundaries of some regions of the endocranial cavity difficult to discern.

3.2.5.1. Midbrain The area of the optic lobes (midbrain) is large, representing the widest part of the endocast (optl, figure 8b). Much of the dorsal surface is unfinished, indicating the position of the extensive anterior dorsal fontanelle (adf, figure 8b). Two closely associated canals leave from the anterolateral face of the midbrain, entering the orbit via a single (on the right of the specimen) or double (on the left) opening. These probably transmitted the oculomotor and profundus nerves (III/Vprof, figure 8b). The trochlear nerve leaves the cranial cavity posteriorly and dorsally (IV, figures 8b and 9b).

3.2.5.2. Hindbrain There is no clear division between the midbrain and hindbrain, although the portion of the hindbrain positioned behind the crus commune sits far ventral relative to the rest of the endocavity, perhaps indicating that the cerebellum projected into the fourth ventricle. Cerebellar auricles cannot be identified. Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

Several canals exit the cranial cavity in the anterior part of the hindbrain. Dorsally, a stout canal transmits 13 an unidentified vessel into the dorsal part of the orbit (v?, figure 8b). The middle cerebral vein exits the rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org cranial cavity some way ventral to this (mcv, figure 8b), and the internal carotid enters more ventrally still (ica, figure 8b). The trigeminal and facial nerves exit from the angle between the midbrain and utricular recess (V and VII, figure 8b). Posterior to the labyrinth, the vagus nerve leaves the ventral margin of the hindbrain through a large, anteroposteriorly elongate canal (X, figure 8b). The region corresponding to the spinal cord is by far the narrowest portion of the endocast, and from its lateral margins issue a dorsal, bifurcating canal for the occipital nerves (focn, figures 8b and 9b,e), and a ventral, single canal for the occipital artery (foca, figures 8b and 9b,e).

3.2.5.3. Labyrinth sci. open Soc. R. The walls of the bony labyrinth are fairly well ossified, except in the region of the sinus superior and anterior ampulla. The three semicircular canals are narrow, and all are fully enclosed in bone (asc, hsc, psc, figures 8b and 9b,e). Both the anterior and posterior canals are anteroposteriorly short, and the horizontal canal is almost isoclinal in its curvature (figure 9c). The orientation of the anterior

ampulla is unclear (aa, figure 8b). The utriculus is dorsoventrally tall, and there is a slight suggestion 5 of division into dorsal and ventral components (utr, figure 8b). A small saccular notch is present (sac, 180497 : figure 8b). Although incompletely ossified, the sinus superior is long (ssu, figure 8d), and the crus commune projects above the roof of the hindbrain and slightly towards the midline (cc, figures 8d and 9b). The lateral cranial canal is very well developed (lcc, figures 8b and 9b,e). As well as anterior and posterior connections to the cranial cavity, it has a dorsal extension that almost reaches the underside of the skull roof. At least a single canal, probably for the endolymphatic ducts (end.d, figure 7a), connects the cranial cavity to the median sinus positioned between the lateral cranial canals.

3.2.5.4. Circulatory system The buccohypophyseal canal is elongate, leaving the anteriormost point of the posterior myodome and continuing anteroventrally (bhc, figure 8). A narrow canal branches from its lateral margin level with the exit of the internal carotids into the orbit (can.bsp: unidentified canal in the region of the basisphenoid, figure 8f,h). Further anteriorly, the buccohypophyseal canal bends dorsally in an ‘s’ shape, before opening onto the ventral surface of the parasphenoid. The path of the internal carotid artery is incompletely known, largely due to the loss of part of the parasphenoid. It presumably entered the parasphenoid posterior to the basipterygoid process (?ica, figure 6e) and continued via an anterodorsally directed canal. This canal opens onto the orbital floor posteromedial to the basipterygoid processes (ica, figures 6e and 8f,h), and enters the cranial cavity through a foramen in a dorsally directed groove medial to the trigeminofacialis chamber (ica, figure 6d,e). The efferent pseudobranchial pierces the parasphenoid beneath the basipterygoid process (epsa, figures 5d,6d and 8f,h) and is transmitted through a vertical canal, exit- ing onto the floor of the orbital as the ophthalmic artery (opa, figures 4b,5b,d,6d,e and 8f,h). The internal carotid and efferent pseudobranchial communicate via a short anastomosing canal (anas, figures 6e and 8f ), and are also linked via the parabasal canal (pbc, figure 6e), which seems to have housed the palatine nerve and artery. The path of the palatine into the orbit is not known, but it appears to have entered the parabasal canal through the same opening as the internal carotid, and opens anteriorly on the lateral margin of the parasphenoid (pal, figures 4b,5b,d,6b,d,e and 8f,h). The internal carotids and efferent pseu- dobranchials do not anastomose with their antimeres, but a narrow transverse canal connects the two ophthalmic arteries.

3.2.6. Body size

The neurocranium of Dapedium is inclined at approximately 508 from the horizontal in articulated specimens, and body size typically ranges from around 15 to 35 cm [18]. Skull length accounts for approximately 18% of body length in Dapedium, but accounts for a much smaller proportion (approx. 10%) in the largest known dapediids. Body length of a large Sargondon tomicus is estimated about 1 m [12], with absolute head length of a medium-sized specimen approximately 6 cm and of the large specimen approximately 10 cm [65]. The length of the preserved portion of PIMUZ A/I 3026 is 17 cm. Based on the proportions of the skull of Dapedium, a conservative estimate for the length of the unbroken skull is 20 cm. Comparison to the largest known dapediid suggests a body length in the region of 2 m. Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

4. Discussion 14 rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org Scopulipiscis saxciput gen. et sp. nov. as a dapediid. Although represented only by an isolated neurocranium, this specimen bears conspicuous similarities to dapediids, in particular the braincase described for Dapedium sp. [27,55]: short aortic canal, parasphenoid ‘wings’ cloaking the basiocciput, median occipital crest punctuated by a large ligamentous pit, parasphenoid extending dorsally between the orbits, fossa bridgei continuous posteriorly with the post-temporal fossa, median sinus between the lateral cranial canals, canals for endolymphatic ducts connecting the cranial cavity to the median sinus and absence of differentiated braincase ossifications. Similar likenesses are found with the endocast of Dapedium sp. [40], including a large lateral cranial canal extending dorsal to the endocranial roof, narrow semicircular canals and a lenticular utriculus. The majority of actinopterygian material from Schesaplana has been identified as either Birgeria sci. open Soc. R. or Lepidotes [66] although unpublished elements in the collections at PIMUZ have been referred to the giant dapediid taxon Sargodon (A. Latimer 2016, personal observation), known from the Late Triassic (Norian) of Italy [12]. The limited anatomical overlap between Sargodon and the braincase described here makes comparisons difficult: Sargodon is known from articulated but laterally compressed fossils, 5 with no part of the braincase, and only small portions of the skull roof, described. Differences are evi- 180497 : dent in some of the few comparable regions, for example the parietals and dermopterotic of Sargodon are quadrate, and those of the specimen described here are markedly rectangular. Furthermore, the cranium of even the largest Sargodon specimen known is only around 10 cm in length. By contrast, the braincase described here is approximately 17 cm, and is incomplete anterior to the orbit, suggesting a total cranial length of at least 20 cm. Consequently, we feel justified in erecting a new genus and species for this specimen: Scopulipiscis saxciput. It is possible that undescribed cranial elements at PIMUZ belong to Scopulipiscis saxciput rather than Sargodon, as their identification was most probably based on size. In the strict consensus tree of our phylogenetic analysis (figure 10), Scopulipiscis saxciput is resolved in a polytomy with all included Dapedium species, Heterostrophus phillipsi, Sargodon tomicus, Dandya ovalis, Hemicalypterus weiri, Paradapedium egertoni, Tetragonolepis oldhami and Tetragonolepis semicincta. This clade is supported by seven homoplastic characters: c.58, one or two suborbitals; c.156, braincase ossifications not differentiated; c.247, complete series of dorsal ridge scales; c.258, caudal fin not forked; c.269, suborbitals extend ventral to orbit; c.275, hem-like median fins; c.276, long-based anal fin. The monophyly of Dapedium is not upheld, and the genus is recovered as paraphyletic in both the Adams consensus tree and agreement subtree (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). Additional characters found in dapediid taxa to the exclusion of immediate outgroups, but which cannot be optimized due to uncertainty over the primitive condition in the clade, include: c.270, coronoids contribute to lateral dentition field; c.273, dorsal extension of parasphenoid between orbits; c.274, ligament pit on posterior face of braincase; c.278, ossified centra absent. The failure to resolve Dapedium as monophyletic is hardly surprising, given that placement of material in this genus traditionally largely relied on the presence of a deep-bodied morphology, and differentiation of species on characters that could covary in individual specimens [12]. Doubts over the monophyly of the genus have been raised before [28], and it is possible that detailed investigation of Sinemurian material from Dorset may find further objections. Only four dapediid taxa are excluded in the agreement subtree (electronic supplementary material, figure S1a), suggesting that only some of the uncertainty stems from conflicting endoskeletal and dermal character sets. The monophyly of dapediids, in contrast, seems well supported, albeit with a different set of characters to those identified in previous phylogenetic analyses [14,37].

4.1. Placement of dapediids Dapediids (along with Hulettia) form a clade of stem holosteans, sharing with other holosteans the following five homoplastic characters: c.89, two infradentaries; c.112, anterodorsal process of subopercu- lum; c.135, anterodorsal myodome single; c.173, parasphenoid with multifid anterior margin; c.178, aortic notch in parasphenoid absent. While dapediids have been recovered as total group holosteans before, they are more typically resolved as the sister group to ginglymodians [36,37]. A stem holostean position was recovered by Lo´pez-Arbarello & Sferco [10] on the basis of two homoplastic characters (four or more supraorbitals and a presupracleithrum), neither of which are optimized as supporting this relationship in the current analysis. A position deep on the holostean stem goes some way to explaining Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

Amia calva 15 Caturus furcatus Watsonulus eugnathoides 96 Atractosteus spatula rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org 96

Holostei Lepisosteus osseus 60 Obaichthys decoratus 84 Macrosemimimus lennieri Semionotus elegans 75 Macrosemius rostratus Propterus elongatus Macrepistius arenatus Aetholepis mirabilis Dapedium pholidotum Dapedium stollorum Dapedium punctatum Dapedium caelatum

Dapediidae Heterostrophus phillipsi Scopulipiscis saxciput Dapedium sp. Dapedium noricum Sargodon tomicus Dandya ovalis Hemicalypterus weiri sci. open Soc. R. Paradapedium egertoni Tetragonolepis oldhami Tetragonolepis semicincta Hulettia americana 83 Dorsetichthys bechei Leptolepis bronni 53 Elops hawaiensis Hiodon alosoides Ichthyokentema purbeckensis Dipteronotus ornatus 5 Peltopleurus lissocephalus 180497 : Neopterygii Luganoia lepidosteoides Venusichthys comptus Bobosatrania groenlandica Ebenaqua ritchei Discoserra pectinodon 56 78 Gibbodon cenesis Brembodus ridens 65 Eomesodon liassicus 75 Arduafrons prominoris Mesturus sp. Mesturus verrucosus 78 Acipenser brevirostrum Chondrosteus acipenseroides Beishanichthys brevicaudalis Fukangichthys longidorsalis Scanilepis dubia Evenkia eunoptera Tanaocrossus kalliokoskii 97 Erpetoichthys calabaricus Polypterus bichir Platysomus superbus Birgeria groenlandica Australosomus kochi Aesopichthys erinaceus Kalops monophyrum Beagiascus pulcherrimus Cosmoptychius striatus 59 Cyranorhis bergeraci Wendyichthys dicksoni Mesopoma planti Amphicentrum granulosum Fouldenia ischiptera Styracopterus fulcratus Saurichthys madagascarensis Boreosomus piveteaui Coccocephalichthys wildi Kansasiella eatoni Lawrenciella schaefferi Luederia kempi Melanecta anneae Pteronisculus stensioi Woodichthys bearsdeni Kentuckia deani Moythomasia durgaringa Moythomasia nitida Moythomasia lineata Gogosardina coatesi 79 Mimipiscis bartrami Mimipiscis toombsi Raynerius splendens Donnrosenia schaefferi Howqualepis rostridens Actinopterygii Osorioichthys marginis Tegeolepis clarki Cheirolepis canadensis 57 Cheirolepis schultzei Cheirolepis trailli Meemannia eos 89 Diplocercides kayseri 52 Miguashaia bureaui Styloichthys changae 56 Eusthenopteron foordi 62 Osteolepis macrolepidotus 62 Gogonasus andrewsae 75 Glyptolepis groenlandica Porolepis sp. 89 Guiyu oneiros Psarolepis romeri Onychodus jandemarrai Ligulalepis Dialipina salguerioensis

Figure 10. Phylogenetic placement of Scopulipiscis saxciput gen. et sp. nov. Strict consensus of the 20 000 shortest trees (1522 steps) for 110 taxa and 291 equally weighted characters. Numbers above nodes represent bootstrap support. Outgroup taxa (Dicksonosteus, Entelognathus, Acanthodes, Cladodoides, Ozarcus) excluded for purposes of space. Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

the peculiar combination of apparent holostean and teleost features that have influenced past hypotheses 16 of phylogenetic relationships. rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org The position of Hulettia as sister taxon to dapediids, with the support of three homoplastic characters (c.247, basal fulcra on dorsal fin; c.249, scutes anterior to anal fin; c.284, preoperculum shorter than oper- culum), is unexpected. We note that Hulettia shows large numbers of character reversals (for the full list of character optimizations see electronic supplementary material, Supplementary Data), suggesting that this position may not be robust. However, Hulettia has previously been associated with Dapedium [32]. Macrepistius is resolved as sister to all other holosteans, supported by one unambiguous (c.10, olfactory nerve pierces premaxilla) and five homoplastic characters (c.14, single median dermal bone capping snout; c.50, tube-like canal bearing anterior arm of antorbital; c.61, circumorbital ring of supraorbitals and infraorbitals closes the orbit; v.107, paired vomer; c.161, sphenotic with small dermal component).

The holostean crown is united by just three homoplastic characters (c.175, parasphenoid teeth small; sci. open Soc. R. c.176, parasphenoid not pierced by internal carotid; c.272, parasphenoid wings around basiocciput absent), indicating that features previously identified as uniting the living radiations may in fact be more widely distributed across the total group. 5 180497 : 4.2. Placement of pycnodonts Pycnodonts are recovered as stem neopterygians in our analysis. The monophyly of pycnodonts is robustly supported by one unambiguous (c.282, prearticular symphysis) and thirteen homoplastic characters. Discoserra is recovered as the immediate outgroup of pycnodonts, with a clade comprising Bobasatrania þ Ebenequa falling as the sister taxon. While this broader clade is supported by five homoplastic characters, we do not regard it as robust: at least some of the characters optimized as supporting this group (e.g. c.276, long-based anal fin) probably reflect anatomical similarities related to a deep-bodied morphology rather than a close phylogenetic relationship. Furthermore, Platysomus is resolved as sister taxon to an unlikely clade comprising cladistians and chondrosteans. These incongru- ent placements highlight that further work is needed to resolve the relationships of other radiations of deep-bodied Palaeozoic fishes. A limited understanding of the internal skeleton of pycnodonts—and those taxa recovered as closely related—may also be a contributing factor. Despite an extensive fossil record stretching from the Late Triassic to the Eocene, few pycnodont neurocrania are described: the most comprehensive description of an early occurring pycnodont braincase is based on a specimen that now appears to be lost (Mesturus sp. [67]). Derived pycnodont neurocrania are known from well-preserved Cretaceous specimens of Neo- proscinetes penlavi and Iemanja palma from Brazil, but are poorly ossified [50,68]. The earliest described pycnodonts are named from articulated but two-dimensional remains from the Norian of Italy [69], with isolated dental elements found in Norian and Rhaetian deposits of Belgium and Luxembourg [70]. As such, we consider our results relating to pycnodonts as preliminary: only a small proportion of the vast diversity of pycnodonts are included, and only one for which the braincase is known in detail. In particular, detailed description of primitive pycnodonts (for example, material from the Early Norian of Italy mentioned as possessing lateral gulars [71]), as well as three-dimensional neurocranial material, may help clarify the position of the group.

4.3. Dapediid diversity Ray-finned fishes with an adaptation to durophagy were well represented in the Triassic [21,72], although dapediids are thought to have made up a fairly small proportion of this diversity. Although many durophages were wiped out during the End-Triassic extinction, dapediids survived and went on to radiate in the Jurassic, presumably filling vacated ecospace [73]. The discovery of a new, exception- ally large [74] dapediid in the Late Triassic indicates that dapediids may have been more diverse before the End-Triassic extinction than previously thought. Although dental elements are not preserved for Scopulipiscis saxciput, similarities in braincase anatomy to Dapedium seem likely to perform a functional role in strengthening the skull during durophagy, including the pronounced midline occipital crest, the deep insertion point for a longitudinal ligament, and the extension of the parasphenoid between the orbits and around the basioccipital. Many of these specializations are seen in other durophagous actinopterygians, including Carboniferous eurynotiforms [75] and Eocene gymnodonts [76]. Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

5. Conclusion 17 rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org This paper presents a new genus and species of giant dapediid from the Schesaplana (Canton Grisons, Switzerland), and is the first actinopterygian braincase to be described from this locality. Although represented only by a three-dimensional neurocranium, Scopulipiscis saxciput can be confidently identified as a dapediid. CT scanning reveals important internal neurocranial anatomy, including a largely complete endocast, and similarities with the braincase of Dapedium suggest that this taxon was also adapted for durophagy. The very large size of this taxon—inferred to be well over 1.5 m in length—increases the known size range of dapediids and suggests that dapediids reached higher levels of diversity than previously anticipated prior to the End-Triassic extinction. An expanded phylogenetic analysis incorporating most dapediid taxa and this new specimen fails to support the monophyly of Dapedium, but recovers Dapediidae as a clade of early diverging holosteans, filling a conspicuous gap on the holostean stem [7]. sci. open Soc. R.

Data accessibility. Three-dimensional surface files (.ply) and scan data (.tiff stack) are available from MorphoMuseuM (https://doi.org/10.18563/journal.m3.44). Other data files, including the data matrix, are provided as electronic supplementary materials. The ZooBank LSID (Life Science Identifier) for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank. org:pub:573AD7A0-7184-4506-A760-BA1632C38479. 5

Authors’ contributions. A.E.L. designed the project. A.E.L. and S.G. segmented the data, produced figures, ran phylogenetic 180497 : analyses, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. Competing interests. We declare we have no competing interests. Funding. This funding was supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation grant no. 31003A_149506 to T. M. Scheyer and L’Ore´al-UNESCO International Rising Talents Fellowship and Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellowship to S. Giles. Acknowledgements. H. Furrer (Zurich), C. Klug (Zurich), I. Werneburg (Tu¨ bingen) and T. Mo¨rs (Uppsala) provided specimen and collections access. M. Plamondon (EMPA, Du¨ bendorf) conducted CT scanning. T. M. Scheyer (Zurich), C. Romano (Zurich), T. Argyriou (Zurich), R. Socha (Warsaw) and M. Friedman (Michigan) provided helpful discussion. Thanks are expressed to A. Mu¨ ller and J. Mansfield.

References

1. Nelson JS. 2006 Fishes of the world, 4th edn. 9. Xu G, Ma X. 2018 Redescription and (Actinopterygii, †Semionotiformes) from the Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. phylogenetic reassessment of Asialepidotus Early Jurassic (Lower Toarcian) of Germany. 2. Sallan LC. 2014 Major issues in the origins of shingyiensis (Holostei: Halecomorphi) from the Geol. Palaeontol. 25, 251–297. ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) biodiversity. Biol. Middle Triassic (Ladinian) of China. Zool. J. Linn. 18. Thies D, Herzog A. 1999 New information on Rev. 89, 950–971. (doi:10.1111/brv.12086) Soc. XX, 1–20. (doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx105/ †Dapedium LEACH 1822 (Actinopterygii, 3. Broughton RE, Betancur-R R, Li C, Arratia G, 4827721) †Semionotiformes). In Mesozoic fishes 2: Ortı´ G. 2013 Multi-locus phylogenetic analysis 10. Lo´pez-Arbarello A, Sferco E. 2018 Neopterygian systematics and fossil record (eds G Arratia, reveals the pattern and tempo of bony phylogeny: the merger assay. R. Soc. open sci. H-P Schultze), pp. 143–152. Munich, Germany: fish evolution. PLoS Curr. 5. (doi:10.1371/ 5, 172337. (doi:10.1098/rsos.172337) Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. currents.tol. 11. Woodward AS. 1895 Catalogue of the fossil 19. Godefroit P, Cuny G, Delsate D, Roche M. 1998 2ca8041495ffafd0c92756e75247483e) fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). Late Triassic vertebrates from Syren 4. Guinot G, Cavin L. 2015 Contrasting ‘fish’ London, UK: British Museum. (Luxembourg). Neues Jahrb. fur Geol. und diversity dynamics between marine and 12. Tintori A. 1983 Hypsisomatic semionotidae Palaontologie Abhandlungen 210, 305–343. freshwater environments. Curr. Biol. 25, (Pisces, Actinopterygii) from the Upper Triassic (doi:10.1127/njgpa/210/1998/305) 2314–2318. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.033) of Lombardy (N. Italy). Riv. Ital. di Paleontol. 20. Gibson SZ. 2015 Evidence of a specialized 5. Clarke JT, Lloyd GT, Friedman M. 2016 Little e Stratigr. 88, 417–442. feeding niche in a Late Triassic ray-finned fish: evidence for enhanced phenotypic evolution in 13. Schaeffer B. 1967 Late Triassic fishes from the evolution of multidenticulate teeth and benthic early teleosts relative to their living fossil sister western United States. Bull. Am. Museum Nat. scraping in †Hemicalypterus. group. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11 531– Hist. 135, 285–342. Naturwissenschaften 102, 10. (doi:10.1007/ 11 536. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1607237113) 14. Gibson SZ. 2016 Redescription and phylogenetic s00114-015-1262-y) 6. Xu G, Gao K, Finarelli JA. 2014 A revision of the placement of †Hemicalypterus weiri Schaeffer, 21. Lombardo C, Tintori A. 2005 Feeding Middle Triassic scanilepiform fish Fukangichthys 1967 (Actinopterygii, Neopterygii) from the specializations in Late Triassic fishes. longidorsalis from Xinjiang, China, with Triassic Chinle formation, southwestern United Ann. dell’Universita` degli Stud. di comments on the phylogeny of the Actinopteri. States: new insights into morphology, ecological Ferrara, volume speciale 2005, 25–32. J. Vert. Paleontol. 34, 747–759. (doi:10.1080/ niche, and phylogeny. PLoS ONE 11, e0163657. 22. Smithwick FM. 2015 Feeding ecology of the 02724634.2014.837053) (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163657) deep-bodied fish Dapedium (Actinopterygii, 7. Friedman M. 2015 The early evolution of 15. Woodward AS. 1929 The Upper Jurassic ganoid Neopterygii) from the Sinemurian of Dorset, ray-finned fishes. Palaeontology 58, 213–228. fish Heterostrophus. J. Zool. 99, 561–566. England. Palaeontology 58, 293–311. (doi:10. (doi:10.1111/pala.12150) 16. Jain S. 1973 New specimens of Lower Jurassic 1111/pala.12145) 8. Giles S, Xu GH, Near TJ, Friedman M. 2017 Early holostean fishes from India. Palaeontology 16, 23. Woodward AS. 1890 The fossil fishes of the members of ‘living fossil’ lineage imply later 149–177. Hawkesbury Series at Gosford: memoirs of the origin of modern ray-finned fishes. Nature 549, 17. Thies D. 1991 The osteology of the bony fish Geological Survey of New South Wales, 265–268. (doi:10.1038/nature23654) Tetragonolepis semicincta BRONN 1830 Palaeontology 4, 1–55. Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

24. Patterson C. 1973 Interrelationships of 38. Gardiner BG. 1960 A revision of certain actinopterygians. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 354, 18 holosteans. In Interrelationships of fishes (eds actinopterygian and coelacanth fishes, chiefly 435–462. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0396)

PH Greenwood, RS Miles), pp. 233–305. from the Lower Lias. Bull. Br. Museum (Natural 53. Giles S, Friedman M, Brazeau MD. 2015 rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org London, UK: Academic Press. Hist. 4, 239–384. Osteichthyan-like cranial conditions in an 25. Lehman J-P. 1966 Actinopterygii. Trait. 39. Arratia G. 2001 The sister-group of Teleostei: Early Devonian stem gnathostome. Nature 520, Pale´ontologie 4, 1–242. consensus and disagreements. J. Vert. Paleontol. 82–85. (doi:10.1038/nature14065) 26. Wenz S. 1968 Comple´ments a` l’e´tude des 21, 767–773. (doi:10.1671/0272- 54. Frost GA. 1913 The internal cranial poissons actinopte´rygiens du jurassique franc¸ais. 4634(2001)021[0767:TSGOTC]2.0.CO;2) elements and foramina of Dapedius Paris, France: E´ditions du Centre national de la 40. Giles S, Rogers M, Friedman M. 2016 Bony granulatus, from a specimen recently found recherche scientifique. labyrinth morphology in early neopterygian in the Lias at Charmouth. Q. J. Geol. Soc. 69, 27. Patterson C. 1975 The braincase of fishes (Actinopterygii: Neopterygii). J. Morphol. 219–222. (doi:10.1144/GSL.JGS.1913.069. pholidophorid and leptolepid fishes, with a 279, 426–440. (doi:10.1002/jmor.20551) 01-04.16) review of the actinopterygian braincase. Phil. 41. Thies D, Hauff RB. 2008 A neotype for 55. Rayner D. 1948 The structure of certain

Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 275–579. (doi:10. Dapedium caelatum QUENSTEDT, 1858 Jurassic holostean fishes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. sci. open Soc. R. 1098/rstb.1975.0001) (Actinopterygii, Neopterygii, Semionotiformes) Lond. B 233, 287–345. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1948. 28. Thies D, Hauff RB. 2011 A new species of from the Early Jurassic (Early Toarcian) of South 0006) Dapedium LEACH, 1822 (Actinopterygii, Germany. Geol. Palaeontol. 42, 23–38. 56. Furrer H. 1993 Stratigraphie und facies der trias/ Neopterygii, Semionotiformes) from the Early 42. Arratia G. 2013 Morphology, taxonomy, and Jura-grenzschichten in den oberostalpinen decken Jurassic of South Germany. Palaeodiversity 4, phylogeny of Triassic pholidophorid fishes graubu¨ndens. Zurich, Switzerland: Universita¨t

185–221. (Actinopterygii, Teleostei). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. Zu¨rich. 5 29. Olsen PE. 1984 The skull and pectoral girdle of 33, 1–138. (doi:10.1080/02724634.2013. 57. Fro¨bisch NB, Fro¨bisch J. 2006 A new basal 180497 : the parasemionotid fish Watsonulus 835642) pterosaur genus from the Upper Triassic of the eugnathoides from the Early Triassic Sakamena 43. Poyato-Ariza FJ. 2005 Pycnodont fishes: northern calcareous Alps of Switzerland. group of Madagascar, with comments on the morphologic variation, ecomorphologic Palaeontology 49, 1081–1090. (doi:10.1111/j. relationships of the holostean fishes. J. Vert. plasticity, and a new interpretation of their 1475-4983.2006.00581.x) Paleontol. 4, 481–499. (doi:10.1080/02724634. evolutionary history. Bull. Kitakyushu Museum 58. Neenan JM, Scheyer TM. 2014 New specimen of 1984.10012024) Nat. Hist. Hum. Hist. A 3, 169–184. Psephoderma alpinum (Sauropterygia, 30. Gardiner BG, Maisey JG, Littlewood DTJ. 1996 44. Nursall JR. 1996 The phylogeny of pycnodont Placodontia) from the Late Triassic of Interrelationships of basal neopterygians. In fishes. In Mesozoic fishes: systematics and Schesaplana Mountain, Graubu¨nden, Interrelationships of fishes (eds MLJ Stiassny, LR paleoecology (eds G Arratia, G Viohl), pp. 125– Switzerland. Swiss J. Geosci. 107, 349–357. Parenti, GD Johnson), pp. 117–146. San Diego, 152. Munich, Germany: Verlag Dr. Friedrich (doi:10.1007/s00015-014-0173-9) CA: Academic Press. Pfeil. 59. Bu¨rgin T, Furrer H. 1993 Kieferreste eines 31. Arratia G. 1999 The monophyly of Teleostei and 45. Nursall JR. 2010 The case for pycnodont fishes grossen Strahlenflossers (Osteichthyes; stem-group teleosts. Consensus and as the fossil sister-group of teleosts. In Origin Actinopterygii) aus der ostalpinen Obertrias der disagreements. In Mesozoic fishes 2: systematics and phylogenetic interrelationships of teleosts Bergu¨ner Sto¨cke (Kanton Graubu¨nden, Schweiz) and fossil record (eds G Arratia, H-P Schultze), pp. (eds JS Nelson, H-P Schultze, MVH Wilson), pp. und Diskussion der Validita¨t von??Birgeria 265–334. Munich, Germany: Verlag Dr. Friedrich 37–60. Munich, Germany: Verlag Dr. Friedrich costata (Mu¨nster 1893). Eclogae Geol. Helv. 86, Pfeil. Pfeil. 1015–1029. 32. Hurley IA et al. 2007 A new time-scale for 46. Poyato-Ariza FJ. 2015 Studies on pycnodont 60. Swofford DL. 2003 PAUP*: Phylogenetic ray-finned fish evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, fishes (I): evaluation of their phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). 489–498. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3749) position among actinopterygians. Riv. Ital. di Version 4. 33. Lo´pez-Arbarello A. 2012 Phylogenetic Paleontol. e Stratigr. 121, 329–343. 61. Wilkinson M. 1995 Coping with abundant interrelationships of ginglymodian fishes 47. Grande L, Bemis WE. 1998 A comprehensive missing entries in phylogenetic inference using (Actinopterygii: Neopterygii). PLoS ONE 7, phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) parsimony. Syst. Biol. 44, 501–514. (doi:10. e39370. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039370) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An 1093/sysbio/44.4.501) 34. Wen W, Zhang Q-Y, Hu S-X, Zhou C-Y, Xie T, empirical search for interconnected patterns of 62. Lloyd GT. 2015 Claddis: An R package for Huang J-Y, Chen ZQ, Benton MJ. 2012 A new natural history. J. Vert. Paleontol. 18, 1–696. performing disparity and rate analysis on basal actinopterygian fish from the Anisian (doi:10.1080/02724634.1998.10011114) cladistic-type data sets. Online GitHub. See (Middle Triassic) of Luoping, Yunnan Province, 48. Grande L. 2010 An empirical synthetic pattern https://github.com/graemetlloyd/Claddis. southwest China. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 57, study of gars (Lepisosteiformes) and closely 63. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2000 Macclade, 149–160. (doi:10.4202/app.2010.0089) related species, based mostly on skeletal version 4.0. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. 35. Xu GH, Wu FX. 2012 A deep-bodied anatomy. The resurrection of Holostei. Copeia 64. Bu¨rgin T, Furrer H. 2004 Fossile Knochenfische ginglymodian fish from the Middle Triassic of 10, iii–x, 1–871. aus der Ko¨ssen-Formation (Obertrias; Rhaet) von eastern Yunnan Province, China, and the 49. Poyato-Ariza FJ, Wenz S. 2002 A new insight Loru¨ns (Vorarlberg, O¨sterreich). Vor. Naturschau phylogeny of lower neopterygians. Chinese Sci. into pycnodontiform fishes. Geodiversitas 24, 14, 67–86. Bull. 57, 111–118. (doi:10.1007/s11434-011- 139–248. 65. Tintori A. 1998 Fish biodiversity in the marine 4719-1) 50. Kriwet J. 2005 A comprehensive study of the Norian (Late Triassic) of northern Italy: the first 36. Bermu´dez-Rochas DD, Poyato-Ariza FJ. 2015 A skull and dentition of pycnodont fishes. Neopterygian radiation. Ital. J. Zool. 65, 193– new semionotiform actinopterygian fish from Zitteliana R. A Mitteilungen der Bayer. 198. (doi:10.1080/11250009809386812) the Mesozoic of Spain and its phylogenetic Staatssammlung fu¨r Palaontologie und Geol. 45, 66. Bu¨rgin T, Furrer H. 1992 Za¨hne und Kieferreste implications. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 13, 265–285. 135–188. der Gattung Birgeria (Osteichthyes, (doi:10.1080/14772019.2014.881928) 51. Cawley JJ, Kriwet J. 2018 A new pycnodont fish, Actinopterygii) aus der ostalpinen Obertrias der 37. Thies D, Waschkewitz J. 2015 Redescription of Scalacurvichthys naishi gen. et sp. nov., from Bergu¨ner Sto¨cke (Kanton Graubu¨nden, Schweiz). Dapedium pholidotum (Agassiz, 1832) the Late Cretaceous of Israel. J. Syst. Palaeontol. Eclogae Geol. Helv. 85, 931–946. (Actinopterygii, Neopterygii) from the Lower 16, 659–673. (doi:10.1080/14772019.2017. 67. Nursall J. 1999 The family †Mesturidae and the Jurassic Posidonia Shale, with comments on the 1330772) skull of pycnodont fishes. In Mesozoic fishes 2: phylogenetic position of Dapedium Leach, 1822. 52. Coates MI. 1999 Endocranial preservation of a systematics and fossil record (eds G Arratia, H-P J. Syst. Palaeontol. 14, 339–364. (doi:10.1080/ Carboniferous actinopterygian from Lancashire, Schultze), pp. 135–188. Munich, Germany: 14772019.2015.1043361) UK, and the interrelationships of primitive Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. Downloaded from http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on September 7, 2018

68. Machado LP. 2008 The braincase of 71. Brunetti M, Lombardo C, Schirolli P, Tintori A. Permian-Triassic Osteichthyes (bony fishes): 19 Neoproscinetes penalvai (Pycnodontiformes, 2001 The new early Norian fish fauna from diversity dynamics and body size evolution. Biol.

Pycnodontidae). In Meszoic fishes 4: homology Garza Valley (Brescia-N. Italy). In 3rd Mesozoic Rev. 91, 106–147. (doi:10.1111/brv.12161) rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org and phylogeny (eds G Arratia, H-P Schultze), Fishes Symp., Serpiano (Italy) 13. 75. Friedman M, Pierce SE, Coates MI, Giles S. pp. 167–180. Munich, Germany: Verlag Dr. 72. Tintori A. 1995 Biomechanical fragmentation in In press. Feeding structures in the ray- Friedrich Pfeil. shell-beds from the late Triassic of the finned fish Eurynotus crenatus (Actinopterygii: 69. Tintori A. 1981 Two new pycnodonts Lombardian Basin (northern Italy). Preliminary Eurynotiformes): implications for (Pisces Actinopterygii) from the Upper report. Riv. Ital. di Paleontol. e Stratigr. 101, trophic diversification among Triassic of Lombardy. Riv. It. Paleont. Strat 86, 371–379. Carboniferous actinopterygians. Earth Environ. 19–30. 73. Bellwood DR, Hoey AS. 2004 Feeding in Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 70. Delsate D, Kriwet J. 2004 Late Triassic Mesozoic fishes: a functional perspective. In 76. Tyler JC. 1980 Osteology, phylogeny, and pycnodont fish remains (Neopterygii, Mesozoic fishes 3, pp. 639–649. Munich, higher classification of the fishes of the Pycnodontiformes) from the Germanic basin. Germany: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. order Plectognathi (Tetraodontiformes).

Eclogae Geol. Helv. 97, 183–191. (doi:10.1007/ 74. Romano C, Koot MB, Kogan I, Brayard A, Minikh NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular 434, sci. open Soc. R. s00015-004-1125-6) AV, Brinkmann W, Bucher H, Kriwet J. 2014 1–422. 5 180497 :