Los Padres National Forest Tamarisk Removal Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Los Padres National Forest Tamarisk Removal Project Los Padres National Forest Tamarisk Removal Project Question: What do tamarisk tree-shrubs, and water clarity and flow have in common? Answer: Tamarisk can divert large quantities of water and potentially release contaminates into water that flows from the Forest to population centers. What’s at Risk?: Tamarisk weed, a nonnative invasive species, has taken hold on all five Los Padres National Forest Ranger Districts where it 1.) grows in scattered dense patches; 2.) competes with native vegetation such as willows and cottonwoods; 3.) can change soil chemistry by depositing salts from groundwater to the soil surface, and thereby contaminate surface water; and 4.) consumes large amounts of water from streams and riparian areas and reduces streamflow. The results are potential negative impacts to downstream communities such as Santa Barbara est. pop 92,000, Goleta est. pop 31,000 and Montecito est. pop 9,000. And, due to its water-consuming ability, Tamarisk also reduces surface water available to wildlife, impacting riparian-dependent species such as the federally-listed arroyo toad, California red-legged frog, and steelhead trout. It also degrades habitat for birds, such as the endangered species-listed least-billed vireo and willow flycatcher who nest in riparian corridors. Despite tamarisk growing along waterways, it can also act as a wick for wildfire, putting thousands of people and infrastructure at risk. Project and Partners: The LP has been working on tamarisk issues on the Forest since 2003 and since 2015, a partnership between the Los Padres and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation has instituted a grant program to help increase the pace and scale of landscape restoration, including tamarisk treatment. Habitat Works was the first partner group to work with the Forest on the eradication, and other partners such as Channel Island Restoration and University of California Santa Barbara have since joined the effort as part of a shared stewardship effort to restore riparian areas impacted by the Zaca and Piru fires. Volunteers in receipt of the funds from these partners go deep into the woods, some of which is in designated Wilderness, to eradicate the weed and report back on additional locations that might exist. The Los Padres National Forest is focusing on tamarisk in portions of Piru Creek, Lockwood Creek, Cuyama River, Santa Ynez River, Sespe Creek, Sisquoc River, and Arroyo Seco River watersheds using a combination of hand treatments and targeted conservative herbicide applications. The Sespe Creek provides municipal water supply to the residents of Ventura County. The Piru Creek has two reservoirs, Pyramid Lake and Lake Piru, both providing water to the California Aqueduct and the western Los Angeles basin. The Santa Ynez also has two reservoirs within the project area; Gibraltar and Jameson Lake both provide municipal water to the central portion of Santa Barbara County via the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District. By removing tamarisk before it becomes the dominant vegetation component, native plant communities would be maintained, and in turn will provide a benefit to aquatic resources dependent on healthy, properly functioning riparian areas. Treatments began in 2016, and are expected to occur through 2021. Monitoring and maintenance treatments would continue thereafter to retreat existing infestations, and to treat new infestations discovered within the project area. It is anticipated that most of the project would be implemented over the next 10 years, with the most intensive treatments occurring during the first five years. Challenges to Eradication: The three partner groups with their labor forces, are working in very steep terrain, making access and logistics difficult and ultimately requiring the use of pack mules to reach dense areas of tamarisk, and to provide all supplies and equipment. There is also no motorized access to most of the project area, insofar as much of it is in Congressionally-designated Wilderness. Pile-burning cut tamarisk stems is not feasible due to the logistics of getting crews and suppression resources down into the canyons to do it. Funding: As a result of the fire settlement restoration monies the Los Padres National Forest received and its partnership with the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, to date, $500K in grants related to tamarisk assessment and eradication have been issued to Habitat Works, Channel Islands Restoration, University of California, Santa Barbara. These grant recipients have brought in an additional $260K in matching value through their use of volunteers and in-kind labor and other donations. The Tamarisk Removal Project will positively impact Nature’s Benefits and ensure they remain available for communities, as well as plant and animal habitat. Removal of the tamarisk along riparian areas (waterways): Water: Will reduce the amount of water that these invasive weeds have been consuming and diverting from the natural Forest hydrology and increase the purity of the water; thereby providing more clean water flow to the downstream populations of Santa Barbara, Goleta, and Montecito totaling more than 125,000 people. Fire: Will reduce the threat tamarisk can create, even in riparian areas, due to it acting as a wick and potentially a ladder fuel. Habitat: Will help maintain fisheries habitat for viable populations of native fish species with habitat improvement and enhance conditions for sensitive, threatened, and endangered species. Tamarisk infestations have various impacts on a number of federally-listed threatened and endangered species and its removal on the Los Padres would restore the area to natural habitats of birds as well as the arroyo toad, California red-legged frog, southwestern pond turtle, two-striped garter snake, and steelhead trout stocks. Recreation: Will return portions of designated Wilderness areas to a more natural state and make more accessible for those who engage in backpacking, hiking, and other non-motorized and non-mechanized recreational activities. Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers Recreation will also benefit from the return of the area to a more natural condition for recreationists who engage in fishing, solitude and wilderness- orientated activities. Carbon: Will likely keep trees in the removal areas healthier as more water will be available in an area that suffers from severe drought, ultimately ensuring those trees can resist bark beetle penetration, and return to their normal function of sequestering carbon. Job Training: Provides job training to the volunteers who participate with the grantee organizations who are involved in the project. In addition, any of the equipment and supplies to include pack mules, if supplied locally will provide benefits to the local economy. Natures’ Benefits and Future Generation: Projects to improve forest and watershed resiliency through shared stewardship has the potential for large positive impacts to Nature’s Benefits. In this case, surrounding communities like Santa Barbara, Goleta, Montecito households will benefit from improvements to water clarity and flow, and less threat to wildfire from tamarisk ignition amongst other benefits. Assurances that water regulation and flow and the threat that severe wildfire will be reduced can provide for economic stability, health and safety, and build trust within communities and between government agencies. Effective communication of the Nature’s Benefits the public receives from these efforts, can increase community interest and awareness, fostering partnerships and the sharing of resources. Only through such cooperation and shared ownership can we ensure future generations have the opportunity to enjoy Nature’s Benefits as well. Picture of tamarisk tree-shrub out of the ground .
Recommended publications
  • Santa Maria Project
    MP Region Public Affairs, 916-978-5100, http://www.usbr.gov/mp, February 2016 Mid-Pacific Region, Santa Maria Project Construction individual landholders pump water according to The Santa Maria Project, authorized in 1954, is their needs. The objective of the project as located in California about 150 miles northwest authorized is to release regulated water from of Los Angeles. A joint water conservation and storage as quickly as it can be percolated into flood control project, it consists of the the Santa Maria Valley ground-water basin. Twitchell Dam where construction began in With this type of operation, Twitchell July 1956 and was completed in October Reservoir is empty much of the time. For this 1958.The Reservoir was constructed by the reason, recreation and fishing facilities are not Bureau of Reclamation, and a system of river included in the project. levees was constructed by the Corps of Engineers. Twitchell Dam Twitchell Dam is located on the Cuyama River about 6 miles upstream from its junction with the Sisquoc River. The dam regulates flows along the lower reaches of the river and impounds surplus flows for release in the dry months to help recharge the ground-water basin underlying the Santa Maria Valley, thus minimizing discharge of water to the sea at Guadalupe. The dam is an earthen fill structure having a height of 241 feet with 216 feet above streambed, and a crest length of 1,804 feet. The dam contains approximately 5,833,000 yards of Twitchell Dam and Reservoir material. The multi-purpose Twitchell Reservoir Water Supply has a total capacity of 224,300 acre-feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic P U B Lic W Ork S P Roje Cts on the Ce N Tra L
    SHTOIRICHISTORIC SHTOIRIC P U B LIC W ORK S P ROJE TSCP ROJE CTS P ROJE TSC ON THE CE N TRA L OCA STCOA ST OCA ST Compiled by Douglas Pike, P.E. Printing Contributed by: Table of Contents Significant Transportation P rojects......2 El Camino Real................................................... 2 US Route 101...................................................... 3 California State Route 1...................................... 6 The Stone Arch Bridge ..................................... 11 Cold Spring Canyon Arch Bridge..................... 12 Significant W ater P rojects...................14 First Dams and Reservoirs................................ 14 First Water Company........................................ 14 Cold Spring Tunnel........................................... 15 Mission Tunnel ................................................. 16 Gibraltar Dam ................................................... 16 Central Coast Conduit....................................... 18 Water Reclamation In Santa Maria Valley....... 23 Twitchell Dam & Reservoir.............................. 24 Santa Maria Levee ............................................ 26 Nacimiento Water Project................................. 28 M iscellaneous P rojects of Interest.......30 Avila Pier .......................................................... 30 Stearns Wharf.................................................... 32 San Luis Obispo (Port Harford) Lighthouse..... 34 Point Conception Lighthouse............................ 35 Piedras Blancas Light ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations at the Oak Flat Site (Ca-Sba-3931) Santa Barbara County, California
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THE OAK FLAT SITE (CA-SBA-3931) SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA by ESTHER LOUISE DRAUCKER A thesis submitted to the Master of Arts Graduate Program in Anthropology at California State University, Bakersfield, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in ANTHROPOLOGY Bakersfield, California 2014 Copyright By Esther Louise Draucker 2014 Frontispiece: Overview of CA-SBA-3931 (Oak Flat), looking west. The base of the rock feature can be discerned in the center. i ABSTRACT The region occupied by the Chumash of south-central California were divided into sub-groups who occupied different territories and spoke separate, but related languages. The Cuyama sub-group occupied the Cuyama Valley and the surrounding hills and mountains. Branch Canyon leads roughly south from Cuyama Valley and is known to contain prehistoric archaeological sites. The site chosen for this investigation was not previously recorded, but is a large, level area where many artifacts have been found. The area is covered with little other than wildflowers and grasses, but broken groundstone is visible, and an extensive looter’s hole exists, which suggests a possible prehistoric habitation site. Local residents have recovered many artifacts here, including glass beads, indicating occupation during the historic era. The base of a large, square rock feature overlays the prehistoric site. Very little archaeological exploration has been carried out in Cuyama Valley and its surrounding environs. Few site records exist for the valley, although many sites have been recorded for the southern canyons and the potreros at the top of the Sierra Madre Range.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Maria Project History
    Santa Maria Project Thomas A. Latousek Bureau of Reclamation 1996 Table of Contents The Santa Maria Project ........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Prehistoric Setting .................................................3 Historic Setting ...................................................4 Authorization...........................................................6 Construction History .....................................................9 Post-Construction History................................................10 Settlement of the Project .................................................12 Uses of Project Water ...................................................13 Conclusion............................................................13 Bibliography ................................................................15 Manuscripts and Archival Material.........................................15 Project Reports, Santa Maria Project..................................15 Government Documents .................................................15 Books ................................................................15 Interviews.............................................................15 Index ......................................................................16 1 The Santa Maria Project The beautiful, broad Santa Maria Basin opens eastward from the Pacific Ocean toward the Sierra
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN SECTION July 2018
    DRAFT GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN SECTION July 2018 CUYAMA VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN DESCRIPTION OF PLAN AREA - DRAFT 2175 North California Blvd., Suite 315 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 925-647-4100 woodardcurran.com COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. PLAN AREA ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Plan Area Definition ............................................................................................. 1 1.3 Plan Area Setting ................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Existing Surface Water Monitoring Programs ..................................................... 24 1.5 Existing Groundwater Monitoring Programs ....................................................... 26 1.5.1 Groundwater Elevation Monitoring ............................................................ 26 1.5.2 Groundwater Quality Monitoring ................................................................ 27 1.5.3 Subsidence Monitoring .............................................................................. 28 1.6 Existing Water Management Programs .............................................................. 29 1.6.1 Santa Barbara County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan 2013 .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report of Hydrogeologic Conditions, Water Requirements, Supplies and Disposition
    2016 Annual Report of Hydrogeologic Conditions, Water Requirements, Supplies and Disposition Santa Maria Valley Management Area Luhdorff and Scalmanini Consulting Engineers April, 2017 Landsat 5 Satellite Image taken November 14, 2008 2016 Annual Report of Hydrogeologic Conditions Water Requirements, Supplies, and Disposition Santa Maria Valley Management Area prepared by Luhdorff and Scalmanini Consulting Engineers April 27, 2017 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Physical Setting .................................................................................................1 1.2 Previous Studies ................................................................................................2 1.3 SMVMA Monitoring Program .........................................................................2 1.4 Additional Monitoring and Reporting Programs ..............................................4 1.5 Report Organization ..........................................................................................4 2. Hydrogeologic Conditions .................................................................................................5 2.1 Groundwater Conditions ...................................................................................5 2.1.1 Geology and Aquifer System ..............................................................5 2.1.2 Groundwater Levels ............................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement - Los Padres National Forest Tamarisk Removal Project
    Final Environmental Impact United States Department of Agriculture Statement Forest Service Los Padres National Forest September 2016 Tamarisk Removal Project Los Padres National Forest Kern, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties, California In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877- 8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuyama Valley Groundwater Basin (3-13) Boundary Modification Request
    CUYAMA VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN (3-13) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION REQUEST TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM April 3, 2018 Prepared for GRAPEVINE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT April 3, 2018 CLEATH-HARRIS GEOLOGISTS 71 Zaca Lane, Suite 140 San Luis Obispo, California 93401 (805) 543-1413 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………….1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED BOUNDARY MODIFICATION (§ 344.6)…………….……...3 Overview of Request for Boundary Modification (§ 344.6(a))……………………………..……...3 Category of Proposed Boundary Modification (§ 344.6(a)(1))…………………………………….3 Identification of all Affected Basins or Subbasins (§ 344.6(a)(2))………………………………….3 Proposed name for each new subbasin (§ 344.6 (a)(3)…….…………….…………………………4 GENERAL INFORMATION (§344.10)…………………………………………………………...5 Description of lateral basin boundaries and definable bottom (§ 344.10(a))……………………….5 Graphical Map of lateral basin boundaries (§344.10 (b)).………………………………………….5 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONCEPTUAL MODEL (§ 344.12)……………………………………….6 Principal Aquifers and Regional Aquitard (§ 344.12(1))…………………………………………..6 Lateral Boundaries (§ 344.12(2))……………………………………………………………….......8 Geologic Features Impacting Groundwater Flow (§ 344.12(2)(A,B,C))…………………………...9 Key Surface Water Bodies and Significant Recharge Sources (§ 344.12(2)(D))…………………12 Recharge and Discharge Areas (§ 344.12(3)) …………………………………………………….12 Definable Bottom of the Basin (§ 344.12(4))……………………………………………………..13 TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR SCIENTIFIC MODIFICATION (§ 344.14)……………...14 Qualified Map (§ 344.14(a)(1))…………………………………………………………………...14 Technical
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water in the Cuyama Valley California
    Ground Water in the Cuyama Valley California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1110-B Ground Water in the Cuyama Valley California By J. E. Upson and G. F. Worts, Jr. CONTRIBUTIONS TO HYDROLOGY, 1948 51 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1110-B Prepared in cooperation with the County of Santa Barbara UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 195* UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For Sale bv the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25. D. G. Price 65 cents CONTENTS Pag* Abstract............................................................. 21 Introduction.......................................................... 22 Location of the area............................................... 22 Development of ground water...................................... 22 Purpose and scope of the work...................................... 28 Acknowledgments................................................. 24 Well-numbering system............................................ 24 Physical features of the area............................................ 25 Geomorphology................................................... 25 Climate.......................................................... 27 Occurrence of ground water............................................ 28 Geologic formations............................................... 28 Principal formations that yield water to wells..................... 32 Alluvium................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Lost Trails of the Los Padres
    Ten Lost Trails of the Los Padres Los Padres ForestWatch June 2012 Ten Lost Trails of the Los Padres Table of Contents PAGE 2 OJAI middle fork matilija Trail 3 SANTA PAULA Santa paula peak Trail 4 PIRU agua blanca & pothole Trails 5 SANTA BARBARA hot springs Trail 6 CARPINTERIA franklin Trail 7 CUYAMA VALLEY rocky ridge & bull ridge trails 8 LOCKWOOD VALLEY alamo creek & beartrap trails 9 ARROYO GRANDE stony creek trail 10 BIG SUR deangulo Trail 11 BIG SUR little sur Trail accessing your what you can do Public access to public lands is a deeply-rooted American tradition, and forest public lands users must act now so that we can continue to enjoy these majestic landscapes for generations to come. Here’s what you can to to help ensure the public’s The communities we call home, right of access to national forest lands: throughout California’s Central . Coast, benefit tremendously by Defend the public’s right to access public lands. Write to your Forest having large expanses of open Supervisor today at Los Padres National Forest, Attn: Forest Supervisor, space in our backyard. Places like 6755 Hollister Ave., Suite 150, Santa Barbara, CA, 93117; Ask the agency the Los Padres National Forest pro- to actively work to promote and restore public access along historically-used vide clean air and drinking water trails. to our towns and farms, enhance . tourism and local businesses, and Support nonprofit organizations like Los Padres ForestWatch and local improve our quality of life. They land trusts who are working to preserve historic public access, by acquiring also offer exciting recreation oppor- private land and by defending historic public access rights in court.
    [Show full text]
  • B118 Basin Boundary Description 2003 –3 013 Cuyama Valley
    Central Coast Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Cuyama Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Cuyama Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 3-13 • County: Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Ventura, and Kern • Surface Area: 147,200 acres (230 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology The Cuyama Valley Groundwater Basin underlies an east-trending valley bounded on the north by the Caliente Range and on the southwest by the Sierra Madre Mountains. The valley is drained by the Cuyama River. Average annual precipitation ranges from 7 inches to 15 inches per year. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater is found in Holocene age alluvium, and older terrestrial deposits. Groundwater in the basin is mainly unconfined, but confined water and perched water are found locally. The specific yield is estimated to range from less than 10 percent in the southwestern part of the basin, to more than 15 percent in the northern and southeastern parts of the basin (DWR 1998). Holocene Alluvium. In the western part of the basin, the alluvium consists of thick beds of sand and gravel alternating with beds of clay. In the south central part of the basin, alluvium is predominantly sand and silt with some beds of gravel and clay. In the eastern part of the basin, alluvium consists of coarse gravel and sand. Except in the western part of the basin, the alluvium is not the principal water-bearing formation. The thickness of the alluvium is inferred to be from 150 to 250 feet (Upson and Worts 1951). Older Terrestrial Deposits. Pleistocene age terrace deposits found in the valley are relatively thin and mainly above the zone of saturation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Agency Information, Plan Area, and Communication
    1. AGENCY INFORMATION, PLAN AREA, AND COMMUNICATION 1.1 Introduction and Agency Information This section describes the Cuyama Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (CBGSA), its authority in relation to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), and the purpose of this Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP). This GSP meets regulatory requirements established by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as shown in the completed Preparation Checklist for GSP Submittal (Appendix A). The CBGSA’s Notification of Intent to Develop a Groundwater Sustainable Plan is in Appendix B. On June 6, 2016, Santa Barbara County Water Agency (SBCWA) sent DWR a notice of intent to form a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA). Following this submittal, the CBGSA Board of Directors was organized, and now includes the following individuals: • Derek Yurosek – Chairperson, Cuyama Basin Water District (CBWD) • Lynn Compton – Vice Chairperson, County of San Luis Obispo • Byron Albano – CBWD • Cory Bantilan – SBCWA • Tom Bracken – CBWD • George Cappello – CBWD • Paul Chounet – Cuyama Community Services District (CCSD) • Zack Scrivner – County of Kern • Glenn Shephard – County of Ventura • Das Williams – SBCWA • Jane Wooster – CBWD In addition, the following individuals serve as alternatives to regular CBGSA Board members: • Darcel Elliott – SBCWA • Steve Lavagnino – SBCWA • Louise Draucker – CCSD • Brad DeBranch – CBWD • Matt Klinchuch – CBWD • Arne Anselm – County of Ventura • Debbie ArnoldDRAFT – County of San Luis Obispo • Alan Christensen – County of Kern Draft Groundwater Sustainability Plan 1-1 Agency Information, Plan Area, and Communication June 2019 During development of this GSP, board meetings were held on the first Wednesday of every month at 4 pm in the Cuyama Family Resource Center, at 4689 California State Route 166, in New Cuyama, California.
    [Show full text]