The Role of Spike Patterns in Neuronal Information Processing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of Spike Patterns in Neuronal Information Processing DISS. ETH NO. 16464 The Role of Spike Patterns in Neuronal Information Processing A Historically Embedded Conceptual Clarification A dissertation submitted to the SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ZURICH for the degree of Doctor of Sciences (Dr. sc. ETH Z¨urich) presented by Markus Christen Lic. phil. nat., Universit¨at Bern born 07. 01. 1969 accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Rodney Douglas, Examiner PD Dr. Ruedi Stoop, Co-Examiner, Supervisor Prof. Dr. Michael Hagner, Co-Examiner 2006 ii Author: Markus Christen, lic. phil. nat. Institute of Neuroinformatics Winterthurerstrasse 190 8057 Zurich c 2006 Brainform B¨ozingenstrasse 5, 2502 Biel, Switzerland http://www.brainform.com Print: Printy, Theresienstrasse 69, 80333 M¨unchen Printed in Germany ISBN-10: 3-905412-00-4 ISBN-13: 978-3-905412-00-4 Purchase order: [email protected] This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the mate- rial is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplica- tion of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only with prior permission from the current publishers. No part of this publication may be stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission from the publishers. You are not allowed to modify, amend or otherwise change this work without prior consent from the the current publishers. All copyright for this work will remain the property of the author. Acknowledgements Writing a PhD thesis is embedded in a net of relations and conditions. Therefore, I have many thanks to express. First, I’m indebted to my PhD supervisor, PD Dr. Ruedi Stoop. He not only made it possible for me to re-enter science after a longer stay in professional life. He also is convinced of the idea that one should find one’s own topic instead of being assigned to one. He offered help, when it was important, and recalcitrance, when it was necessary in order to sharpen my own ideas. He finally allowed my expeditions into the fields of humanities, which made it possible to combine two cultures in this interdisciplinary PhD, which usually remain separated. Profs. David Gugerli and Michael Hagner were the exponents on the other side of this cultural divide, who provided assistance and many helpful comments. Sincere thanks go to both of them. I was lucky that I was integrated in a small, but busy group of excellent physicists and engineers. We not only shared science, but also life and beer to some degree – an aspect that never should be underestimated. Specific thanks go to Albert Kern for his assistance in understanding the correlation integral, to Thomas Ott for many clusterings and to Jan- Jan van der Vyver for programming, computer, and language help. Various alumni and visitors of the Stoop group and many more people in the Institute of Neuroinformatics could be mentioned as well. I cut short by thanking Profs. Rodney Douglas and Kevan Martin, who made it possible that such an institute can exist. Furthermore, I’m very much obliged to those, who provided data that have been used in this study and made it possible to analyze the tools introduced by this work. My thanks go to Alister Nicol of the Cognitive & Behavioural Neuroscience Lab of the Babraham Institute in Cambridge, Adam Kohn of the Center of Neural Science of the New York University, Valerio Mante and Matteo Carandini of the Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute in San Francisco, and Kevan Martin of the Institute of Neuroinformatics. The historical part of this PhD originated in the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin. Many thanks go to Profs. Michael Hagner and Hans-Jorg¨ Rhein- berger, who made it possible to join this exciting community from December 2004 to March 2005. I also thank Urs Schoepflin for his helpful comments for my bibliometric studies and the participants of the colloquium of the ‘Abteilung III’ that commented and criticized the first version of this part. I finally thank Robert Ruprecht and Adrian Whatley for proofreading the scientific and the historical part of this thesis. They are certainly not to blame for the remaining mistakes. The most important thanks are always expressed at the end: I thank my parents and my sisters for their existence, and Meret for her love. Markus Christen, November 2005 iii iv Contents Acknowledgements iii Zusammenfassung ix Summary x Statement xii 1 Introductory Remarks 1 1.1 Goals of this Study ................................. 1 1.2 Methodology .................................... 3 1.3 Organization of the Thesis ............................. 3 1.3.1 Main Line of Argumentation ....................... 3 1.3.2 Typographic Structure and Layout .................... 5 1.4 Abbreviations and List of Symbols ........................ 6 1.4.1 Abbreviations . ............................. 6 1.4.2 List of Symbols . ............................. 6 I Historical Roots of the Information Processing Brain 9 2 The Brain on the Cusp of the Information Age 11 2.1 Introduction ..................................... 11 2.1.1 The Information Processing Brain .................... 11 2.1.2 The Historical Context ........................... 13 2.2 Cornerstones of the Information Age ....................... 15 2.2.1 The Conceptualization of Information .................. 15 2.2.2 Information Theory ............................ 16 2.2.3 Cybernetics ................................. 19 2.3 Preconditions for the Information Processing Brain ............... 21 2.3.1 The Scheme for Analysis .......................... 21 2.3.2 The Neuron Doctrine ........................... 23 2.3.3 Spikes and Messages ............................ 25 2.3.4 Measuring Single Fibres .......................... 28 v vi CONTENTS 3 The Birth of the Information Processing Brain 31 3.1 1940-1970: Overview . ............................. 31 3.2 1940-1970: Detailed Analysis ........................... 33 3.2.1 A new Role for the Neuron? ........................ 33 3.2.2 Applying the Information Vocabulary .................. 35 3.2.3 The Emergence of a Toolbox for Spike Train Analysis . ...... 51 3.2.4 The (Random) Network .......................... 53 3.2.5 The Active and Reliable Brain ...................... 56 3.2.6 The Modelling Approach ......................... 61 4 1940 – 1970: The Dynamics of Research 65 4.1 Journals and Publications ............................. 65 4.2 Conferences ..................................... 69 4.3 Protagonists ..................................... 75 4.4 Synopsis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis ................ 86 4.4.1 Up to 1940: Preconditions ......................... 86 4.4.2 1940-1970: Main Developments ...................... 88 II Patterns in Neuronal Spike Trains 91 5 Neural Coding and Computation 93 5.1NeuralCoding................................... 93 5.1.1 What is a ‘Neural Code’? ......................... 93 5.1.2 Rate Coding vs. Temporal Coding ....................100 5.1.3 Single Neurons vs. Neuronal Assemblies .................102 5.2 Neural Computation . .............................103 6 Defining Patterns 105 6.1 Characteristics of Patterns .............................105 6.1.1 Defining ‘Spike Pattern’ ..........................105 6.1.2 Types of Events . .............................108 6.1.3 The Stability of Patterns .........................111 6.2 The Background of a Pattern ...........................113 6.2.1 The Significance of Patterns ........................113 6.2.2 The Poisson Hypothesis.........................113 6.2.3 Randomization Methods ..........................116 6.3 Noise and Reliability . .............................119 6.3.1 What is Noise in Neuronal Systems? ...................119 6.3.2 Noise Sources in Neurons .........................119 6.3.3 The Reliability of Neurons .........................122 6.3.4 Can Neurons Benefit from Noise? .....................124 6.4 Functional Aspects of Spike Patterns .......................125 6.4.1 Causing Patterns: Network, Oscillation, Synchronization . ......126 6.4.2 Using Patterns: LTP and Coincidence-Detection ............131 6.5 Spike Patterns: Examples .............................134 CONTENTS vii 6.6TheStoop-Hypothesis...............................137 6.6.1 Neurons as Limit Cycles ..........................138 6.6.2 Locking – The Coupling of Limit Cycles .................139 6.6.3 Emergence of a Coding Scheme ......................141 6.6.4 The Role of Patterns ............................146 6.6.5 The Integral Framework ..........................148 7 Detecting Patterns 151 7.1 The Problem of Pattern Detection ........................151 7.1.1 Outlining the Problem ...........................151 7.1.2 Pattern Detection Methods: Overview ..................152 7.1.3 Spike Train Distance Measures: Overview ................153 7.2 Histogram-based Pattern Detection ........................155 7.2.1 Classes of Histograms ...........................155 7.2.2 1D Interval Histograms ..........................160 7.3 Correlation Integral based Pattern Discovery ..................163 7.3.1 The Correlation Integral ..........................163 7.3.2 Smeared log-log Steps ...........................164 7.3.3 Pattern Length Estimation ........................166 7.4 Template-based Pattern Recognition .......................170 7.4.1 The Template Approach ..........................170
Recommended publications
  • The Creation of Neuroscience
    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Systems Neuroscience Explanations Mechanistic?
    Are Systems Neuroscience Explanations Mechanistic? Carlos Zednik [email protected] Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück 49069 Osnabrück, Germany Paper to be presented at: Philosophy of Science Association 24th Biennial Meeting (Chicago, IL), November 2014 Abstract Whereas most branches of neuroscience are thought to provide mechanistic explanations, systems neuroscience is not. Two reasons are traditionally cited in support of this conclusion. First, systems neuroscientists rarely, if ever, rely on the dual strategies of decomposition and localization. Second, they typically emphasize organizational properties over the properties of individual components. In this paper, I argue that neither reason is conclusive: researchers might rely on alternative strategies for mechanism discovery, and focusing on organization is often appropriate and consistent with the norms of mechanistic explanation. Thus, many explanations in systems neuroscience can also be viewed as mechanistic explanations. 1 1. Introduction There is a widespread consensus in philosophy of science that neuroscientists provide mechanistic explanations. That is, they seek the discovery and description of the mechanisms responsible for the behavioral and neurological phenomena being explained. This consensus is supported by a growing philosophical literature on past and present examples from various branches of neuroscience, including molecular (Craver 2007; Machamer, Darden, and Craver 2000), cognitive (Bechtel 2008; Kaplan and Craver 2011), and computational
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Neuroscience of Mathematical Cognition and Learning
    CHAPTER 15 Systems Neuroscience of Mathematical Cognition and Learning: Basic Organization and Neural Sources of Heterogeneity in Typical and Atypical Development Teresa Iuculano, Aarthi Padmanabhan, Vinod Menon Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States OUTLINE Introduction 288 Ventral and Dorsal Visual Streams: Neural Building Blocks of Mathematical Cognition 292 Basic Organization 292 Heterogeneity in Typical and Atypical Development 295 Parietal-Frontal Systems: Short-Term and Working Memory 296 Basic Organization 296 Heterogeneity in Typical and Atypical Development 299 Lateral Frontotemporal Cortices: Language-Mediated Systems 302 Basic Organization 302 Heterogeneity in Typical and Atypical Development 302 Heterogeneity of Function in Numerical Cognition 287 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811529-9.00015-7 © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 288 15. SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE OF MATHEMATICAL COGNITION AND LEARNING The Medial Temporal Lobe: Declarative Memory 306 Basic Organization 306 Heterogeneity in Typical and Atypical Development 306 The Circuit View: Attention and Control Processes and Dynamic Circuits Orchestrating Mathematical Learning 310 Basic Organization 310 Heterogeneity in Typical and Atypical Development 312 Plasticity in Multiple Brain Systems: Relation to Learning 314 Basic Organization 314 Heterogeneity in Typical and Atypical Development 315 Conclusions and Future Directions 320 References 324 INTRODUCTION Mathematical skill acquisition is hierarchical in nature, and each iteration of increased proficiency builds on knowledge of a lower-level primitive. For example, learning to solve arithmetical operations such as “3 + 4” requires first an understanding of what numbers mean and rep- resent (e.g., the symbol “3” refers to the quantity of three items, which derives from the ability to attend to discrete items in the environment).
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube,” Science in Context 28: 31-52
    Garson, J. (2015) “The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube,” Science in Context 28: 31-52. Preprint (not copyedited or formatted) Please use DOI when citing or quoting: https://doi- org.proxy.wexler.hunter.cuny.edu/10.1017/S0269889714000313 The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube Word Count: 10, 418 Abstract: As historian Henning Schmidgen notes, the scientific study of the nervous system would have been ‘unthinkable’ without the industrialization of communication in the 1830s. Historians have investigated extensively the way nerve physiologists have borrowed concepts and tools from the field of communications, particularly regarding the nineteenth-century work of figures like Helmholtz and in the American Cold War Era. The following focuses specifically on the interwar research of the Cambridge physiologist Edgar Douglas Adrian, and on the technology that led to his Nobel-Prize- winning research, the thermionic vacuum tube. Many countries used the vacuum tube during the war for the purpose of amplifying and intercepting coded messages. These events provided a context for Adrian’s evolving understanding of the nerve fiber in the 1920s. In particular, they provide the background for Adrian’s transition around 1926 to describing the nerve impulse in terms of “information,” “messages,” “signals,” or even “codes,” and for translating the basic principles of the nerve, such as the all-or-none principle and adaptation, into such an “informational” context. The following also places Adrian’s research in the broader context of the changing relationship between science and technology, and between physics and physiology, in the first few decades of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • A Meta-Analysis of Functional MRI Results
    RESEARCH Cooperating yet distinct brain networks engaged during naturalistic paradigms: A meta-analysis of functional MRI results 1 1 1 2 Katherine L. Bottenhorn , Jessica S. Flannery , Emily R. Boeving , Michael C. Riedel , 3,4 1 2 Simon B. Eickhoff , Matthew T. Sutherland , and Angela R. Laird 1Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA 2Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA 3Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/netn/article-pdf/3/1/27/1092290/netn_a_00050.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 4Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany an open access journal Keywords: Neuroimaging meta-analysis, Naturalistic paradigms, Clustering analysis, Neuro- informatics ABSTRACT Cognitive processes do not occur by pure insertion and instead depend on the full complement of co-occurring mental processes, including perceptual and motor functions. As such, there is limited ecological validity to human neuroimaging experiments that use Citation: Bottenhorn, K. L., Flannery, highly controlled tasks to isolate mental processes of interest. However, a growing literature J. S., Boeving, E. R., Riedel, M. C., Eickhoff, S. B., Sutherland, M. T., & shows how dynamic, interactive tasks have allowed researchers to study cognition as it more Laird, A. R. (2019). Cooperating yet naturally occurs. Collective analysis across such neuroimaging experiments may answer distinct brain networks engaged during naturalistic paradigms: broader questions regarding how naturalistic cognition is biologically distributed throughout A meta-analysis of functional MRI k results. Network Neuroscience, the brain. We applied an unbiased, data-driven, meta-analytic approach that uses -means 3(1), 27–48.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Choices: How Neuronal Networks Make Decisions Dispatch
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Current Biology, Vol. 13, R140–R142, February 18, 2003, ©2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII S0960-9822(03)00076-9 Behavioral Choices: How Neuronal Dispatch Networks Make Decisions Ronald L. Calabrese Shaw and Kristan [3] asked how the decision between shortening and swimming is made by the leech — specifically at what level the antagonism To survive, animals must constantly make behavioral between these behavioral networks occurs. What they choices. The analysis of simple, almost binary, found was somewhat surprising. At the trigger level behavioral choices in invertebrate animals with there was no antagonism: stimuli that activated short- restricted nervous systems is beginning to yield ening and swimming both activated trigger neurons. insight into how neuronal networks make such Even at the decision or command neuron level, some decisions. neurons were activated by both types of stimulus. One key neuron — cell 204 — however, was strongly inhibited by stimuli that led to shortening. The neurons Simple behavioral choices often seem binary and of the swim CPG were similarly mixed in their sequential. For example, an animal perceives some- responses. Some elements were strongly inhibited by thing novel in its environment, it chooses approach shortening stimuli and others were excited by short- over withdrawal, and sensing potential food, it chooses ening stimuli. to eat or to reject the item. Such decisions often begin What is to be made of these observations? CPG with a drive that originates in a need that is, in turn, neurons are multifunctional — there is a large body of conditioned by internal state and external stimuli.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixed Action Patterns and the Central Nervous System
    9.20 M.I.T. 2013 Lecture #6 Fixed Action Patterns and the Central Nervous System 1 Scott ch 2, “Controlling behavior: the role of the nervous system” 3. Give an example of a “supernormal stimulus” that acts as a releaser of a fixed action pattern in herring gull chicks. (See p 21) • See the conspicuous red-orange spot on the beak of an adult Herring gull on the next slide. Gull chicks respond to this visual stimulus with a gaping response—which elicits a feeding response from the parent. • A stronger gaping response can be elicited by a human who moves a yellow pencil painted with an orange spot. The spot plus the movement forms a “supernormal” stimulus. • Another example: Triggering the egg-rolling response from an adult gull: A larger-than-normal egg can elicit a stronger response. 2 Courtesy of Bruce Stokes on Flickr. License CC BY-NC-SA. 3 Can you give examples of supernormal stimuli for humans? 4 Supernormal stimuli for humans: • Foods: Sweet in taste, high in fats (Beware of restaurants!) • Stimuli of sexual attraction: The “poster effect” in advertizing • Enhancements of male appearance – Shoulder width, exagerated – Penis prominence enhanced: Sheath in tribal dress, cowl in medieval constumes • Enhancements of female appearance: – Waist-to-hip ratio enhancements: Girdle, bustle – Breast prominence increased – Lip color, size enhanced (How? For what purpose?) – Shoulder size: But what is the purpose of shoulder pads in women’s dress? 5 Scott ch 2, “Controlling behavior: the role of the nervous system” 4. Define: Primary sensory neuron, secondary sensory neuron, motor neuron, interneuron (neuron of the great intermediate net).
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Lateral Giant Escape Neurons in Crayfish Sensory Activation And
    Sensory Activation and Receptive Field Organization of the Lateral Giant Escape Neurons in Crayfish Yen-Chyi Liu and Jens Herberholz J Neurophysiol 104:675-684, 2010. First published 26 May 2010; doi:10.1152/jn.00391.2010 You might find this additional info useful... This article cites 57 articles, 31 of which can be accessed free at: http://jn.physiology.org/content/104/2/675.full.html#ref-list-1 Updated information and services including high resolution figures, can be found at: http://jn.physiology.org/content/104/2/675.full.html Additional material and information about Journal of Neurophysiology can be found at: http://www.the-aps.org/publications/jn This infomation is current as of February 10, 2012. Downloaded from jn.physiology.org on February 10, 2012 Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. It is published 12 times a year (monthly) by the American Physiological Society, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda MD 20814-3991. Copyright © 2010 by the American Physiological Society. ISSN: 0022-3077, ESSN: 1522-1598. Visit our website at http://www.the-aps.org/. J Neurophysiol 104: 675–684, 2010. First published May 26, 2010; doi:10.1152/jn.00391.2010. Sensory Activation and Receptive Field Organization of the Lateral Giant Escape Neurons in Crayfish Yen-Chyi Liu1 and Jens Herberholz1,2 1Department of Psychology, 2Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Submitted 28 April 2010; accepted in final form 26 May 2010 Liu YC, Herberholz J. Sensory activation and receptive field 1999; Herberholz 2007; Krasne and Edwards 2002a; Wine and organization of the lateral giant escape neurons in crayfish.
    [Show full text]
  • Portia Perceptions: the Umwelt of an Araneophagic Jumping Spider
    Portia Perceptions: The Umwelt of an Araneophagic Jumping 1 Spider Duane P. Harland and Robert R. Jackson The Personality of Portia Spiders are traditionally portrayed as simple, instinct-driven animals (Savory, 1928; Drees, 1952; Bristowe, 1958). Small brain size is perhaps the most compelling reason for expecting so little flexibility from our eight-legged neighbors. Fitting comfortably on the head of a pin, a spider brain seems to vanish into insignificance. Common sense tells us that compared with large-brained mammals, spiders have so little to work with that they must be restricted to a circumscribed set of rigid behaviors, flexibility being a luxury afforded only to those with much larger central nervous systems. In this chapter we review recent findings on an unusual group of spiders that seem to be arachnid enigmas. In a number of ways the behavior of the araneophagic jumping spiders is more comparable to that of birds and mammals than conventional wisdom would lead us to expect of an arthropod. The term araneophagic refers to these spiders’ preference for other spiders as prey, and jumping spider is the common English name for members of the family Saltici- dae. Although both their common and the scientific Latin names acknowledge their jumping behavior, it is really their unique, complex eyes that set this family of spiders apart from all others. Among spiders (many of which have very poor vision), salticids have eyes that are by far the most specialized for resolving fine spatial detail. We focus here on the most extensively studied genus, Portia. Before we discuss the interrelationship between the salticids’ uniquely acute vision, their predatory strategies, and their apparent cognitive abilities, we need to offer some sense of what kind of animal a jumping spider is; to do this, we attempt to offer some insight into what we might call Portia’s personality.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany
    Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany Individual Fates and Global Impact Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze princeton university press princeton and oxford Copyright 2009 © by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siegmund-Schultze, R. (Reinhard) Mathematicians fleeing from Nazi Germany: individual fates and global impact / Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-12593-0 (cloth) — ISBN 978-0-691-14041-4 (pbk.) 1. Mathematicians—Germany—History—20th century. 2. Mathematicians— United States—History—20th century. 3. Mathematicians—Germany—Biography. 4. Mathematicians—United States—Biography. 5. World War, 1939–1945— Refuges—Germany. 6. Germany—Emigration and immigration—History—1933–1945. 7. Germans—United States—History—20th century. 8. Immigrants—United States—History—20th century. 9. Mathematics—Germany—History—20th century. 10. Mathematics—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. QA27.G4S53 2008 510.09'04—dc22 2008048855 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Sabon Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ press.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 10 987654321 Contents List of Figures and Tables xiii Preface xvii Chapter 1 The Terms “German-Speaking Mathematician,” “Forced,” and“Voluntary Emigration” 1 Chapter 2 The Notion of “Mathematician” Plus Quantitative Figures on Persecution 13 Chapter 3 Early Emigration 30 3.1. The Push-Factor 32 3.2. The Pull-Factor 36 3.D.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Holzinger LV 709.049
    A. Holzinger LV 709.049 Welcome Students! At first some organizational details: 1) Duration This course LV 709.049 (formerly LV 444.152) is a one‐semester course and consists of 12 lectures (see Overview in Slide 0‐1) each with a duration of 90 minutes. 2) Topics This course covers the computer science aspects of biomedical informatics (= medical informatics + bioinformatics) with a focus on new topics such as “big data” concentrating on algorithmic and methodological issues. 3) Audience This course is suited for students of Biomedical Engineering (253), students of Telematics (411), students of Software Engineering (524, 924) and students of Informatics (521, 921) with interest in the computational sciences with the application area biomedicine and health. PhD students and international students are cordially welcome. 4) Language The language of Science and Engineering is English, as it was Greek in ancient times and Latin in mediaeval times, for more information please refer to: Holzinger, A. 2010. Process Guide for Students for Interdisciplinary WorkinComputer Science/Informatics. Second Edition, Norderstedt: BoD. http://www.amazon.de/Process‐Students‐Interdisciplinary‐Computer‐ Informatics/dp/384232457X http://castor.tugraz.at/F?func=direct&doc_number=000403422 WS 2015/16 1 A. Holzinger LV 709.049 Accompanying Reading ALL exam questions with solutions can be found in the Springer textbook available at the Library: Andreas Holzinger (2014). Biomedical Informatics: Discovering Knowledge in Big Data, New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978‐3‐319‐04528‐3
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Data Elements in Information Processing
    PB-249-530 MANAGEMENT OF DATA ELEMENTS IN INFORMATION PROCESSING U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards SECOND NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND 1975 OCTOBER 23-24 Available by purchase from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Va. 221 Price: $9.25 hardcopy; $2.25 microfiche. National Technical Information Service U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PB-249-530 Management of Data Elements in Information Processing Proceedings of a Second Symposium Sponsored by the American National Standards Institute and by The National Bureau of Standards 1975 October 23-24 NBS, Gaithersburg, Maryland Hazel E. McEwen, Editor Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Elliot L. Richardson, Secrefary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Acfing Direc/or Table of Contents Page Introduction to the Program of the Second National Symposium on The Management of Data Elements in Information Processing ix David V. Savidge, Program Chairman On-Line Tactical Data Inputting: Research in Operator Training and Performance 1 Irving Alderman, Ph.D. "Turning the Corner" on MIS, A Proposed Program of Data Standards in Post-Secondary Education 9 Donald R. Arnold, Ph.D. ASCII - The Data Alphabet That Will Endure 17 Robert W. Bemer Techniques in Developing Standard Procedures for Data Editing 23 George W. Covill An Adaptive File Management Systems 45 Dennis L. Dance and Udo W. Pooch (Given by Dance) A Focus on the Role of the Data Manager 57 Ruth M, Davis, Ph.D. A Proposed Standard Routine for Generating Proposed Standard Check Characters 61 Paul -Andre Desjardins Methodology for Development of Standard Data Elements within Multiple Public Agencies 69 L.
    [Show full text]