The Monroe Doctrine and United States National Security in the Early Twentieth Century
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SECURITY, CONFLICT AND COOPERATION IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD The Monroe Doctrine and United States National Security in the Early Twentieth Century alex bryne Security, Confict and Cooperation in the Contemporary World Series Editors Effe G. H. Pedaliu LSE Ideas London, UK John W. Young University of Nottingham Nottingham, UK The Palgrave Macmillan series, Security, Confict and Cooperation in the Contemporary World aims to make a signifcant contribution to academic and policy debates on cooperation, confict and security since 1900. It evolved from the series Global Confict and Security edited by Professor Saki Ruth Dockrill. The current series welcomes proposals that offer innovative historical perspectives, based on archival evidence and promoting an empirical understanding of economic and political coop- eration, confict and security, peace-making, diplomacy, humanitarian intervention, nation-building, intelligence, terrorism, the infuence of ideology and religion on international relations, as well as the work of international organisations and non-governmental organisations. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14489 Alex Bryne The Monroe Doctrine and United States National Security in the Early Twentieth Century Alex Bryne Nottingham, UK Security, Confict and Cooperation in the Contemporary World ISBN 978-3-030-43430-4 ISBN 978-3-030-43431-1 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43431-1 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations. Cover credit: Granger Historical Picture Archive/Alamy Stock Photo This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Just as the citizens of the United States gave thanks to the Monroe Doctrine during its centennial anniversary, I too wish to express my grat- itude to the individuals and organisations that have made this book pos- sible. The parameters and premise of this study were frst developed in my doctoral thesis and I would like to accordingly thank the University of Nottingham’s School of Cultures, Languages and Area Studies for funding my research and providing me with several travel grants. I am similarly grateful to the association for British American Nineteenth Century Historians (BrANCH) for awarding me a Peter Parish Memorial Fund Research Grant to support a research trip to the United States. The process of transforming my doctoral research into a monograph has been a challenging one—writing a book without the security of full-time academic employment took a heavy fnancial and emotional toll. I am therefore eminently grateful to the following individuals for their guidance, support, and assistance over the past few years. My doc- toral supervisors Bevan Sewell and Maria Ryan have continued to sup- port my research since my graduation, as have my doctoral examiners Paul McGarr and David Milne. Jimmy Brookes, Mark Eastwood, Alex Ferguson, Steve Gallo, Daniel King, Hannah Murray, Ben Offler, Jennie O’Reilly, Steven Parftt, and Elizabeth Wiedenheft have all shaped the book in one way or another, be that through reading drafts or enter- taining my ramblings on early twentieth-century United States foreign v vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS relations. In this regard, special thanks must be paid to my brothers- in-arms Tom Bishop and Lorenzo Costaguta. It has been a pleasure to work with Molly Beck and Maeve Sinnott at Palgrave, and my fnal thanks go to the anonymous reviewers of my work who provided insight- ful, detailed, and valuable feedback. CONTENTS Introduction: A Cluster of Loyalties 1 The Empire of the Monroe Doctrine 19 Regional Hegemony and Pan-Americanism 45 A Shibboleth and a War 93 The Trichotomy of the Treaty Fight 131 One Hundred Years and Still Going Strong? 171 Conclusion: Anything or Nothing 201 Bibliography 209 Index 237 vii LIST OF FIGURES The Empire of the Monroe Doctrine Fig. 1 “Uncle Sam’s Temptation” 28 Fig. 2 “Uncle Sam’s Picnic” 38 Regional Hegemony and Pan-Americanism Fig. 1 “He’ll take the old umbrella along” 59 Fig. 2 “That’s a live wire, gentlemen” 74 Fig. 3 “Magnifed Security” 83 A Shibboleth and a War Fig. 1 “Mad Dog?” 100 Fig. 2 “The Vast Territory That Our Monroe Doctrine Obligates Us to Defend” 122 The Trichotomy of the Treaty Fight Fig. 1 “The Rocky Road to Peace” 139 Fig. 2 “Why all this fuss over article ten?” 149 One Hundred Years and Still Going Strong? Fig. 1 “One hundred years old and still going strong. You can’t help wishing him many happy returns of the day” 173 ix x LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 2 Monroe Doctrine centennial half dollar 183 Fig. 3 Tomb of James Monroe, hollywood cemetery, Richmond, VA 186 Conclusion: Anything or Nothing Fig. 1 Secretary of State John Kerry speaks at the Organization of American States on November 18, 2013 208 Introduction: A Cluster of Loyalties To citizens of the United States, the advent of the twentieth century signifed more than the mere passage of time. A palpable sense of expec- tation and excitement accompanied the turn of the century as Americans dreamt up wonderous new destinies for their nation. The scene in New York City on 31 December 1900 was typical. Throngs of Americans flled the city’s lavishly decorated streets to watch impressive frework displays and enjoy festive singing and dancing. Crowds gathered around preachers who lauded the passing of the old and the arrival of the new, proclaiming that Americans could “count with confdence upon still greater material progress in the future.”1 Magazine editors tapped into the abundant fascination with the dawning of a new century and pub- lished verbose articles on the bright future that awaited Americans. The aptly named Century Magazine claimed that this optimism was rational and predicted with utmost certainty that the United States would wit- ness improved working conditions, the end of political corruption, and a greater international role within a few short years.2 The twentieth cen- tury was heralded as one of prosperity and progress and a moment in which the United States was prepared to reap the benefts of a new era. 1 New York Tribune, January 1, 1901, 1. 2 The Century Magazine, January 1901, 473–474. © The Author(s) 2020 1 A. Bryne, The Monroe Doctrine and United States National Security in the Early Twentieth Century, Security, Confict and Cooperation in the Contemporary World, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43431-1_1 2 A. BRYNE Although these statements can be dismissed as a mixture of pageantry and hyperbole, there was, in fact, some truth to them. The emergence of the progressive movement pointed to various avenues of domestic and societal reform and there was ample evidence to suggest that the United States was entering a distinct new chapter in its history that marked its rise as a great power on the world stage. Nowhere was this clearer than in the development of the nation’s imperial policies. Since its independ- ence, the United States had chiefy confned its territorial expansion to the North American continent. Only the acquisition of several tiny unin- habited islands in the Caribbean and Pacifc supplemented a broader pol- icy of settler colonialism and armed confict with Native American tribal nations and Mexico. Yet the United States entered the twentieth century having initiated a new phase of imperial expansion and empire-building that fundamentally altered its geopolitical reach. The annexation and subsequent pacifcation of the Philippines solidifed the nation’s impe- rial interests in East Asia, and the development of a predominantly infor- mal empire in Central America and the Caribbean unleashed an imperial drive for regional hegemony in the Western Hemisphere centred on the protection of the Panama Canal Zone. Within the frst few years of the new century, the scope and nature of the United States Empire had been emphatically redefned.3 3 The nature of United States imperialism continues to attract signifcant attention among historians. Recent studies that have shaped scholarly discourse include Daniel Immerwahr, How to Hide An Empire: A Short History of the Greater United States (London: Bodley Head, 2019); Antony Hopkins, American Empire: A Global History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018); Walter Hixon, American Settler Colonialism: A History (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013); Paul Kramer, “Power and Connection: Imperial Histories of the United States in the World,” American Historical Review 116, no. 5 (2011): 1348–1391; Richard Immerman, Empire for Liberty: A History of American Imperialism from Benjamin Franklin to Paul Wolfowitz (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010); Charles Maier, Among Empires: American Ascendancy and Its Predecessors (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007); Mary Heiss, “The Evolution of the Imperial Idea and U.S.