DOCSLIB.ORG

Purchase from to Remove the Watermark

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Purchase from to Remove the Watermark DEMO : Purchase from www.A-PDF.com to remove the watermark IMPORTANT MANAGEMENT EFFECTS IN URBAN COPPICE FORESTS Barbora Fedorová 1, Jan Kadavý 1, Zden ěk Adamec 1, Robert Knott 2, Aleš Ku čera 3, Michal Kneifl 1, Karel Drápela 1 1Department of Forest Management and Applied Geoinformatics, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic 2Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zem ědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic 3Department of Geology and Pedology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zem ědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic Abstract Coppice was very common type of the management in the landscape in the past centuries. In these coppice forests were done only clear cuts in the end of the rotation periods. But during last twenty years renew interest in coppice forests has developed and a new trend was created, to do thinning in the coppice, due to higher resistance to climate change. It is known that coppice can be a suitable forest management how to mitigate drought issues in the forestry –and in the landscape. Furthermore, thinning is a good silvicultural treatment how to influence available water for trees in the landscape. Thinned coppice and low tree height can be attractive in urban settings, moreover visitors do not like unmanaged stands. Thinned coppice create different landscape structure. The effect of thinning in young oak-hornbeam coppice on diameter increment and soil water content was monitored in the Moravian part of the Czech Republic. It can be concluded that the diameter increment and soil moisture was significantly higher in thinned plots. Diameter increment of sessile oak was 59 % higher in thinned plots, for European hornbeam 61 %. Volumetric soil moisture content was 43 % higher in thinned plots. We can notice several advantages for visitors and forest owners. Key words: thinning, soil moisture, coppicing, diameter increment, landscape Introduction Coppice forests provide shelter for invertebrates, birds, mammals and lots of plant species. So, it is a place of high biodiversity (Vild et al. 2013). Coppice is a renewable source of energy (McKenney et al. 2011). And coppice forests are more and more suggested for urban situations (Nielsen & Møller 2008). Coppicing is the oldest silvicultural system which is used. Re-sprouting (the ability of the broadleaved trees to sprout from the stump) is used for establishment of new stands. Nowadays it seems reasonable to carry out thinning in coppice because of the global climate change and drought periods. It is a new approach in comparison to past times, where only clear cuts were done. It has been proved that soil moisture increases after thinning and that is why more water is available to remaining sprouts in stools. This topic has been mainly studied in the Mediterranean area and several papers published a positive impact of thinning on soil moisture (Cotillas et al. 2009; Rodríguez-Calcerrada et al. 2011). For the Central Europe does not exist lots of studies. The study was focused on the effect of thinning on diameter increment and soil water content in young oak-hornbeam coppice. - 153 - Materials and methods The study was located near Brno in Southeastern Moravia, Czech Republic (49º25´N, 16º68´E). The study area was located at an altitude of 328 m a.s.l.. This site is characterized by an annual mean temperature of 7.5°C, with annual mean precipitation of 550–650 mm. The soils are Cambisols. Studied forest stand is young oak-hornbeam coppice. In 2008, a coppice stand was established by the clear-cut on the area of 40 x 125 meters according to the methodology of Kadavý et al. (2011). Thinning was done on the half of the total area during the winter 2014/2015 with a hand saw at the ground level and 50% of basal area of each stool was reduced. One to five dominant sprouts were left. Volumetric soil moisture content was monitored during the years 2015 and 2016 by using a PR2 Profile Probe (Delta-T Devices, Ltd., Cambridge, UK) and SM300 Soil Moisture Sensor with HH2 Moisture Meter ‒ Readout Unit (Delta-T Devices, Ltd., Cambridge, UK). In each plot, three 40 cm long probes were permanently installed and soil moisture was measured every week at 5 cm depth with SM300 Soil Moisture Sensor and at 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm depths with PR2 Profile Probe. Sprout diameters were measured at a height of 50 cm above the sprout base by calliper in millimeters. At one sprout two measurements perpendicular to each other were done. The diameters were measured in the growing season 2015 and 2016. All data were analysed in STATISTICA 12 (StatSoft 2013). Results Volumetric soil moisture was higher at thinned plots (Fig. 1). Difference between soil moisture of thinned and unthinned plots was statistically significant during two years after thinning. Soil moisture of thinned plots was 43 % higher than that of unthinned plots in 2015 (Fedorová et al. 2016). In 2016, soil moisture was 26 % higher in thinned plots. Thinning influenced the diameter increment of the studied species (Fig. 2). Difference between diameter increment of thinned and unthinned plots was statistically significant during two years after thinning. In 2015, diameter increment of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl was 59 % higher in thinned plots and 61 % for Carpinus betulus L. respectively. In 2016, diameter increment of Q. petraea was 40 % higher in thinned plots and 28 % for C. betulus respectively. Discussion We can notice several advantages for visitors and forest owners when the thinning in coppice is done. Thinning in coppice have a good impact on aesthetic values and create place for children playgrounds. Another point is that thinning effects ecological values, especially soil moisture. In the future it will be the factor of drought more and more important. Thinning also influence the economic output from the coppice. Thinned coppice and low tree height can be attractive in urban settings, moreover visitors does not like unmanaged stands (Rydberg 2000). Lots of visitors do not like logging residues, dead snags and decaying wood in forests (Tyrväinen et al. 2003). And this is not the case of coppice, where all sprouts are used for biomass and/or for firewood. In urban areas coppice can be also recommended for vegetation filters to remove nutrients from municipal waste and surface water (Rydberg & Falc 2000). Thinned coppice can be used for screening and sheltering from wind without blocking sunshine, enrich the environment for the urban wildlife (Rydberg 2000). - 154 - In the future coppice may ensure stability of forest landscape. Coppice is a suitable active urban forest, where the management is more ecologically-oriented. Coppice can make your neighbourhoods more green, coppice with trees and bushes of low tree height is a good forest management close to the gardens and houses (Rydberg & Falc 2000). Such silvicultural system is for example preferred in Finland by younger residents with a higher education and active urban forest users (Tyrväinen et al. 2003). Fig. 1: Mean values of soil moisture (with 95% confidence interval) for thinned and unthinned plots in 2015 (Fedorová et al. 2016) and 2016 Fig. 2: Mean values of diameter increment (with 95% confidence interval) of sessile oak and European hornbeam for thinned and unthinned plots in 2015 (Fedorová et al. 2016) and 2016 Conclusion In conclusion, thinning in coppice influence social, economical and ecological values and is recommended to do. Thinning in coppice brings advantages for the forest owners and visitors. - 155 - References Cotillas, M., Sabaté, S., Gracia, C., & Espelta, J. M., (2009): Growth response of mixed mediterranean oak coppices to rainfall reduction. Could selective thinning have any influence on it? Forest Ecology and Management, 258(7): 1677–1683. Fedorová, B., Kadavý, J., Adamec, Z., Kneifl, M., Knott, R., (2016): Response of diameter and height increment to thinning in oak-hornbeam coppice in the southeastern part of the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 62(5): 229–235. Kadavý, J., Kneifl, M., Servus, M., Knott, R., Hurt, V., (2011): Coppice and coppice- with-standards - a full-fledged alternative for small and medium-sized forest owners (methodology and description of research objects in conversion to coppice and coppice-with-standards in the Czech Republic) (in Czech). 1. vyd. Brno: Mendel University in Brno, 83 pp. ISBN 978-80-7375-519-5. McKenney, D.W., Wemshanov, D., Fraleigh, S., Allen, D., Preto, F., (2011): An economic assessment of the use of short-rotation coppice woody biomass to heat greenhouses in southern Canada. Biomass & Bioenergy, 35: 374–384. Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., Pérez-Ramos, I.M., Ourcival, J.M., Limousin, J.M., Joffre R., Rambal, S., (2011): Is selective thinning an adequate practice for adapting Quercus ilex coppices to climate change? Annals of Forest Science, 68: 575–585. Rydberg, D., (2000): Initial sprouting, growth and mortality of European apen and birch after selective coppicing in central Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 130: 27–35. Rydberg, D., Falc, J., (2000): Urban forestry in Sweden from a silvicultural perspective: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47: 1–18. StatSoft, Inc., 2013. STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Version 12. Tulsa, USA. Tyrvainen, L., Silvennoinen, H., Kolehmainen, O., (2003): Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban Forestry & Urban greening, 1: 135–149. Vild, O., Role ček, J., Hédl, R., Kopecký, M., Utínek, D., (2013): Experimental restoration of coppice-with-standards: Response of understorey vegetation from the conservation perspective. Forest Ecology and Management, 310: 234–241. Acknowledgement The research was realized with the contribution of funds of Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology Mendel University in Brno, CZ, project number 15/2015 and of funds of Cost Action FP 1301: “Coppice as a biological and production alternative for future in the Czech Republic”, project number LD15117.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book of Abstracts
    FINAL PROGRAM & ABSTRACTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW (click the day) SUNDAY 08 MONDAY 09 TUESDAY 10 PROGRAM OVERVIEW (click the day) WEDNESDAY 11 THURSDAY 12 FRIDAY 13 31st European Congress of Arachnology Organisers: Hungarian Ecological Society and the Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences in co-operation with the community of Hungarian arachnologists Co-organising partners: Apor Vilmos Catholic College & European Society of Arachnology 8–13 July, 2018 Vác, Hungary Budapest, 2018 (version 24/VII) Edited by László Mezőfi and Éva Szita Organising Committee Ferenc Samu – chair Csaba Szinetár – co-chair György Dudás Róbert Gallé László Mezőfi Zsolt Szabó Éva Szita Tamás Szűts Natalija Vukaljovic Scientific committee Ferenc Samu co-ordinator Tamás Szűts co-ordinator Dimitar Dimitrov Marco Isaia Simona Kralj Fišer Wolfgang Nentwig Stano Pekár Gabriele Uhl Supporting Committee Zsuzsa Libor, AVKF rector – chair Ervin Balázs, director MTA ATK Zoltán Botta-Dukát, president MÖTE András Füri, director DINP Jenő Kontschán, director PPI, MTA ATK Yuri Marusik, director Russian Party Helpers Erika Botos, János Eichardt, Dániel Erdélyi, Katinka Feketéné Battyáni, Dávid Fülöp, Péter Kovács, Katalin Lehoczki, Teréz Márkus, Gábor Merza, Szilvia Mezőfi, Zsuzsanna Pál, András Rákóczi, Zsolt Szabó, Luca Török, Tamás Török, Violetta Varga, János Vígh The logo The 31st ECA logo, designed by Éva Szita, depicts the uloborid spider Hyptiotes paradoxus perching on the signal thread of its reduced orb-web. The typical triangular orb is framed by
    [Show full text]
  • Rozšíření Druhu Hieracium Sabaudum V České Republice
    Masarykova univerzita v Brně Přírodovědecká fakulta Ústav botaniky a zoologie Rozšířenídruhu Hieracium sabaudum vČeskérepublice Diplomová práce Brno2007 Autorka:Bc.PetraStrnadová Vedoucí diplomové práce:Mgr.OlgaRotreklová,Ph.D. Konzultant: Ing.JiříDanihelka,Ph.D. Souhlasím suložením tétodiplomové práce vknihovně Ústavubotaniky a zoologie Přírodovědecké fakulty Masarykovy univerzity vBrně, případně jiné knihovně Masarykovy univerzityvBrně,s jejím veřejným půjčováním a využitím provědecké, vzdělávací nebo jiné veřejně prospěšné účely, a to za předpokladu, že převzaté informace budouřádně citoványanebudouvyužíványkomerčně. VBrně11.5.2007 2 Touto cestou bych chtěla poděkovat Mgr. Olze Rotreklové, Ph.D., za vedení celé práce. Děkuji za to,že si na mne našla čas,i když hosama měla velmi málo.Děkuji,že mi věnovala spoustu času při luštění starých sched a hloubání nad zajímavými lokalitami. Též děkuji za velkou trpělivost, ochotu, kterou mi věnovala, za revizi herbářových položek,za to,že mi umožnila nakouknout dotajůpočítání chromozomů. Děkuji také Ing.JiřímuDanihelkovi,Ph.D.,za pomoc při úpraváchdatabáze,za luštění schedareviziherbářovýchpoložek. Dále děkuji doc. RNDr. Vítu Grulichovi, CSc., za veškeré náměty, za pomoc při čtení herbářovýchsched; Mgr.Jindřichovi Chrtkovi jun.,CSc., za pomoc a ochotupři revizi herbářovýchpoložek; knihovnicím Katedry botanikyIvě Adámkové,DiS.a Lucii Jarošové,DiS.za vstřícnost při zajišťování potřebné literatury; Mgr.Ondřeji Hájkovi za pomoc přizjišťovánífytochorionů. Mé poděkování zaslouží i doc.RNDr.Petr Bureš,Ph.D.,kterými
    [Show full text]
  • Páteřní Silniční Síť Kraje Vysočina Doprava
    # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # PátPeoříčíř nand# Sázíav ousilniční síVoťdsliv y kraje V# ysočina # Úherčice Honbice Přes#tavlky Hrádek ! # VodrantyKrchleby # Zálší # # # Bousov # ! # # Mrač # #Zájezdec # Bukovany # Ledečko Souňov Žá#ky Drob#ovice Míčov-#SušiceKostelec u Heřmanova Městce Rabštejnská Lhota Slatiňany Trojovice # Vračovice-Orlov # 3 Xav#erov # # # # # Orel # ÚSTÍ NAD ORLICÍ Sudějov 3 Žleby # Řetůvka 1 Ostř#edek # # # Žlebské C#hvalovice Řes#toky Jenišovice Domo#radice Vodě#rady # Legenda / Legend 8 # VYSOKÉ MÝTO 4 Choratice Rataje nad Sázavou 3 Soběhrdy # Třeb#onín # Rosice 3 # Kozmice Prachovice 7 # Čakov Ronov nad Doubravou # Zaječice # 5 Tisová # D Tupadly # # Ře#tová 1 # Potěhy Ho#rky Vápenn#ý Podol Loz#ice České Heřmanice Kraj Opatovice I # Biskupice 3 # Chlí#stov Petro#upim Drahň#ovice # # Dlouhá Třebová Schořov Mlado#ňovice Bítovany CHRAST 5 # Hraběšín # # Džbánov 1 1 Podveky # Svídnice #! # hranice Teplýšovice # Adamov Hostovlice TŘEMOŠNICE # Lukavice 4 Václavice # Zbizuby Černíny # # # Horky # # # Kně#žice #! Hru#šová # Český Šternberk Paběnice Bra#tčice Licibořice 7 Řep#níky 3 Sloupnice # Červené Janovice # Liboměřice# 3 Horka Zá#dolí # Pří#vrat BENEŠOV D # Okřesaneč # # Luže Pus#tina 5 Bohuňovice Ostrov JIHLAVA 1 # # # # Štipoklasy Střemošice 4 #! Petrovice II # 3 Zvěs#tovice Žumberk Hroubovice # BučinaCerekvice nad Loučnou Vlčkov # # 1 8 Sk#ryje # # # # ! sídlo úřadu Divišov 1 Čestín Šebes#těnice Křižanovice Řídký Litichovice # # Zbraslavice # Sm#rček Javorník # # Soběšín # Seč 7 Libe#cina #
    [Show full text]
  • Plán Regionálních Linek
    273 JÍZDENKY Z DOMOVA - ESHOP.IDSJMK.CZ Březová nad INTEGROVANÝ DOPRAVNÍ SYSTÉM JIHOMORAVSKÉHO KRAJE Svitavou 295 S22 S2 INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM IN THE SOUTH MORAVIA R Březina Bystré 19 XXXX XXX XXXX XXXX Brněnec Moravská Registrujte se na 297 Horní Slatina Jevíčko IDS JMK 301 Chrastová 285 Smržov Korbelova 290 Deštná 272 PLÁN REGIONÁLNÍCH LINEK - SEVER eshop.idsjmk.cz Nyklovice Chrastová Lhota BrťovVelké 286 Bohuňov Lhota Roubanina Opatovice 251 Rumberk Bezděčí Skočova 291 PLAN OF REGIONAL LINES - NORTH 287 273 Jaroměřice 275 Lhota Rovečné 274 Chlum Horní Rozhraní Dolní Malá 253 290 Poříčí Stvolová Smržov Stav k / Valid from 01. 05. 2021 Kněževes S22 S2 271 Roudka Velká R Uhřice Prostřední Babolky Roudka Velké 19 Svárov Veselka Dolní Borová Rovné-Divišov Poříčí 291 Tresné 290 290 S31 Poříčí Skrchov Slatinka Ústup Novičí 280 Cetkovice Legenda / Key 380 Olešnice Křetín Lazinov Meziříčko272 Borotín Domanín 256 S21 Úsobrno Lhota u Rozsíčka 254 Kochov Vanovice Bystřice nad Olešnice 277 301 274 Letovice Železniční linky / Railway lines Crhov Světlá Rozsochy Pernštejnem 257 Sulíkov 254 Kladoruby Drválovice 334 Vranová275 Křtěnov Pohora Železniční stanice / Railway station Vřesice Zábludov 271 370 Pamětice 277 257 254 291 Tramvaje / Trams Rozseč Jasinov 273 Knínice u Šebetov Prosetín Louka Petrov Lhota 277 Vísky nad 276 Boskovic 270 Horní 19 Autobusy a trolejbusy / Buses and trolleybuses Makov Nýrov S2 Podolí Sudice Kunštátem R 277 Štěpánov 370 256 Rudka Zboněk Míchov Bačov Věchnov 252 Vážany 302 Čísla linek / Line Numbers 267 266
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of Polish Spiders (Araneae, Except Salticidae) File:///D:/Internet/Polen/Polen Spinnenliste 2004.Htm
    Check-list of Polish spiders (Araneae, except Salticidae) file:///D:/Internet/Polen/Polen Spinnenliste 2004.htm Check-list of Polish spiders (Araneae, except Salticidae) 1. November, 2004 by Wojciech STARĘGA Instytut Biologii, Katedra Zoologii, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce [email protected] The present list is a compilation and continuation of the earlier check-lists of Polish spiders (PRÓSZYŃSKI & STARĘGA 1971, 1997, 2003, STARĘGA 1983, PROSZYNSKI & STAREGA 2002]. It will be currently updated, according to the progress of cognition of the country's spider fauna. I give also a list of the most important faunistic and other publications after 1971 which add any species new to the Polish fauna (or cross out some of them). The nomenclatural changes were regarded as far as possible to unify the names used in Polish arachnological literature with those in foreign check-lists and catalogues (e.g. PLATEN & al. 1995, commented by BLICK 1998), NENTWIG et. at. 2003, TANASEVITCH 2004, and first of all, with the latest version (5.0) of the "Spider Catalog" by PLATNICK (2004). The species, which occurrence in Poland is certain, have serial numbers, some exceptions which need confirmation or re-examination are marked with "X" sign instead of a number; doubtful species were not listed, though named in earlier papers (pre-1971). Species described from Poland (or with Polish localities mentioned in their original descriptions) are marked with „☼” sign. Species not "officially" known (i.e. published) from Poland but whose occurrence is already confirmed have remark „(fide ... [the name of its finder])". Some nomenclatorical remarks are given in square brackets. The species protected by law are marked with an asterisk (*), threatened ones - with symbols (in italics) used in the newest "Red list of threatened species in Poland" (STARĘGA & al.
    [Show full text]
  • Náměš• Nad Oslavou Bystřice Nad Pernštejnem Velká Bíteš Velké Meziříčí
    Køtìnov u Olešnice Kobylnice nad Svratkou Sazomín Branišov nad Pernštejnem Domanínek Dvoøištì u Bystøice nad Pernštejnem Øeèice nad Bobrùvkou Bøezí nad Oslavou Albrechtice u Rozsoch Rozsochy Bystøice nad Pernštejnem Br•oví Radešínská Svratka Koroužné Hodíškov Dlouhé na Moravì Obyètov Blažejovice u Rozsoch Kotlasy Prosetín u Bystøice nad Pernštejnem Lesoòovice Bratrušín Švaøec ±tyøi Dvory Vojetín u Rozsoch OSOVÁ BÍTÝŠKA Bohdalov Pokojov Ostrov nad Oslavou Borovec Raèice u Dlouhého Rodkov Horní Rožínka Podolí nad Bobrùvkou Zvole nad Pernštejnem Kozlov u Lesoòovic Štìpánov nad Svratkou Vìchnov Vrtìžíø Horní Bobrová Znìtínek Olešínky Suky Olešnièka Zlatkov Hodonín u Kunštátu Bohdalec 568 Starý Teleèkov Chroustov u Bohdalova Radostín nad Oslavou Dolní Bobrová Ujèov Radešín nad Bobrùvkou Dolní Rožínka Blažkov Rožná Horní ±epí Knìževes nad Oslavou Josefov u Rožné Lískovec u Nedvìdice Pavlov Kyjov u ±erné Rousmìrov Býšovec Mirošov u Bobrové ±ernovice u Kunštátu 600 Dolní ±epí Milasín Kováøová Krásnìves Zahradištì Dolní Rozsíèka Chlébské 661 Bobrùvka Jabloòov Milíkov Vìžná na Moravì Horní Rozsíèka Sklené nad Oslavou Bukov na Moravì Zadní Zhoøec Smrèek 694 Nedvìdice pod Pernštejnem Záseka 556 Skorotice Brumov u Lomnice Pikárec Moravec Pernštejn Dolní Bory Strážek Horní Bory Jemnice u Moravce Mitrov Osiky Dìdkov Radenice Støítež u Bukova ±ernvír Netín Bor u Nedvìdice Køeptov Køížovice 662 Habøí Sejøek Radkov u Moravce Blízkov Olší nad Oslavou Moravecké Pavlovice Bìleè u Lomnice Strhaøe Rakové Synalov Mìøín Olší u Tišnova Doubravník Jívoví 530 Ochoz
    [Show full text]
  • Near-Natural Restoration Vs. Technical Reclamation of Mining Sites in the Czech Republic
    / Near-natural restoration vs. technical reclamation of mining sites in the Czech Republic Editors: Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek & Karel Prach Near-natural restoration vs. technical reclamation of mining sites in the Czech Republic / Near-natural restoration vs. technical reclamation of mining sites in the Czech Republic Editors: Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek & Karel Prach Near-natural restoration vs. technical reclamation of mining sites in the Czech Republic Editors: Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek & Karel Prach © 2011 Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice ISBN 978-80-7394-322-6 České Budějovice 2011 / Preface The proceedings you are just opening concern ecological restoration of sites dis- turbed by mining activities. They summarize current knowledge with an emphasis on near-natural restoration, in light of theoretical aspects of restoration ecology as the young scientific field. The proceedings are largely based on contributions presented at a workshop organized by the Calla NGO and the Working Group for Restoration Ecology, Fac- ulty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice. About 30 special- ists, both scientists and practitioners, attended the workshop. This English version emerged from the Czech one published in 2010, adapting the texts to an interna- tional readership, reducing local and too specific information. The proceedings are published under the bilateral German-Czech project DBU AZ26858-33/2 (Utilisa- tion of near-natural re-vegetation methods in restoration of surface-mined land – principles and practices of ecological restoration) thus a brief chapter reflecting German experiences is newly included. Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek & Karel Prach, the editors August 2011-08-15 Acknowledgement: The editors Klára Řehounková a Karel Prach were supported by the grants DBU AZ26858-33/2 and GA CR P/505/11/0256.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrace Okres Kraj Územní Oblast Abertamy Karlovy Vary Karlovarský Kraj Plzeň Adamov Blansko Jihomoravský Kraj Brno Ad
    Administrace Okres Kraj Územní oblast Abertamy Karlovy Vary Karlovarský kraj Plzeň Adamov Blansko Jihomoravský kraj Brno Adamov České Budějovice Jihočeský kraj České Budějovice Adamov Kutná Hora Středočeský kraj Trutnov Adršpach Náchod Královéhradecký kraj Trutnov Albrechtice Karviná Moravskoslezský kraj Ostrava Albrechtice Ústí nad Orlicí Pardubický kraj Jeseník Albrechtice nad Orlicí Rychnov nad Kněžnou Královéhradecký kraj Trutnov Albrechtice nad Vltavou Písek Jihočeský kraj České Budějovice Albrechtice v Jizerských horách Jablonec nad Nisou Liberecký kraj Trutnov Albrechtičky Nový Jičín Moravskoslezský kraj Ostrava Alojzov Prostějov Olomoucký kraj Brno Andělská Hora Bruntál Moravskoslezský kraj Jeseník Andělská Hora Karlovy Vary Karlovarský kraj Plzeň Anenská Studánka Ústí nad Orlicí Pardubický kraj Jeseník Archlebov Hodonín Jihomoravský kraj Brno Arneštovice Pelhřimov Vysočina Jihlava Arnolec Jihlava Vysočina Jihlava Arnoltice Děčín Ústecký kraj Ústí nad Labem Aš Cheb Karlovarský kraj Plzeň Babice Hradec Králové Královéhradecký kraj Trutnov Babice Olomouc Olomoucký kraj Jeseník Babice Praha-východ Středočeský kraj Praha Babice Prachatice Jihočeský kraj České Budějovice Babice Třebíč Vysočina Jihlava Babice Uherské Hradiště Zlínský kraj Zlín Babice nad Svitavou Brno-venkov Jihomoravský kraj Brno Babice u Rosic Brno-venkov Jihomoravský kraj Brno Babylon Domažlice Plzeňský kraj Plzeň Bácovice Pelhřimov Vysočina Jihlava Bačalky Jičín Královéhradecký kraj Trutnov Bačetín Rychnov nad Kněžnou Královéhradecký kraj Trutnov Bačice Třebíč Vysočina
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders (Araneae) from the Panský Diel (Starohorské Vrchy Mts, Slovakia)
    Arachnol. Mitt. 36: 9-20 Nürnberg, Dezember 2008 Spiders (Araneae) from the Panský diel (Starohorské vrchy Mts, Slovakia) Valerián Franc & Stanislav Korenko Abstract: Spiders were collected at the massif 'Panský diel' near the city of Banská Bystrica (Central Slovakia). We recorded 252 spider species for the territory and one new species for Slovakia. Although the summit reaches an altitude of 1.100 m a.s.l., more or less thermophilous species apparently prevail here, especially at lower moderate sites. On the other hand, only several typical oreophilous species were documented. Many recorded species are scarce or even very rare. This indicates the very high value of this territory from both a genetic and an environmental perspective. Key words: biomonitoring, faunistics, new record, NATURA 2000, Starohorské vrchy Mts Banská Bystrica is a regional capital situated direct- 2003–2005. We applied several collecting methods, ly in the centre of Slovakia among mountainous especially sifting detritus, sweeping the spiders terrain. Detailed research on spiders of this region from vegetation and hand-collecting under stones, was carried out by Svatoň in the 1970s, especially etc. Material was identified according to MILLER on the Urpín hill situated adjacent to the suburban (1971), HEIMER & NENTWIG (1991), ROBERTS area (SVATOŇ 1985). The author mentioned many (1995) and LOKSA (1969, 1972). The difficult genus rare, largely thermophilous spider species, including Dysdera was identified according to ŘEZÁČ et al. several new records for the Slovakian fauna. The (2007) and the genus Eresus according to ŘEZÁČ et spider fauna of the rest of this territory including al. (2008). The genus Sibianor was identified accor- the Panský diel Mt is, however, almost unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Počet Obyvatel V Obcích České Republiky K 1. 1. 2020 Population of Municipalities of the Czech Republic, 1 January 2020
    Počet obyvatel v obcích České republiky k 1. 1. 2020 Population of municipalities of the Czech Republic, 1 January 2020 Kód Code Počet obyvatel Population Průměrný věk Average age Název obce okresu obce celkem muži ženy celkem muži ženy Name of municipality LAU 1 LAU 2 Total Males Females Total Males Females CZ0100 554782 Praha 1324277 647286 676991 41,9 40,5 43,3 Okres Benešov CZ0201 529303 Benešov 16758 8024 8734 42,9 41,2 44,5 CZ0201 532568 Bernartice 234 112 122 44,6 47,7 41,8 CZ0201 530743 Bílkovice 218 108 110 43,5 43,7 43,3 CZ0201 532380 Blažejovice 111 54 57 48,4 45,5 51,2 CZ0201 532096 Borovnice 86 41 45 43,9 40,9 46,6 CZ0201 532924 Bukovany 773 387 386 40,4 40,9 39,9 CZ0201 529451 Bystřice 4483 2235 2248 41,5 40,3 42,7 CZ0201 532690 Ctiboř 150 79 71 36,4 36,4 36,5 CZ0201 529478 Čakov 125 66 59 40,5 39,0 42,2 CZ0201 529486 Čechtice 1393 675 718 43,3 41,8 44,7 CZ0201 529516 Čerčany 2917 1453 1464 41,4 40,8 42,1 CZ0201 529532 Červený Újezd 349 173 176 41,1 40,5 41,7 CZ0201 529541 Český Šternberk 166 80 86 43,6 44,1 43,1 CZ0201 529567 Čtyřkoly 721 348 373 40,6 40,1 41,1 CZ0201 532746 Děkanovice 63 32 31 43,8 43,5 44,0 CZ0201 529621 Divišov 1758 881 877 40,5 38,9 42,2 CZ0201 529648 Dolní Kralovice 881 440 441 44,8 43,3 46,3 CZ0201 532151 Drahňovice 103 55 48 37,0 32,3 42,4 CZ0201 532843 Dunice 63 35 28 42,9 39,2 47,6 CZ0201 529702 Heřmaničky 728 368 360 43,0 42,9 43,1 CZ0201 532932 Hradiště 23 15 8 53,4 49,2 61,4 CZ0201 529737 Hulice 298 144 154 44,1 44,7 43,6 CZ0201 529745 Hvězdonice 334 170 164 42,1 41,5 42,7 CZ0201 532886 Chářovice
    [Show full text]
  • Komplexní Socioekonomická Charakteristika Správního Obvodu Obce S Rozší Řenou P Ůsobností Tišnov
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI Přírodov ědecká fakulta Katedra geografie Iva SCHALLEROVÁ Komplexní socioekonomická charakteristika správního obvodu obce s rozší řenou p ůsobností Tišnov Bakalá řská práce Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Zden ěk SZCZYRBA, Ph.D. Olomouc 2009 1 Prohlašuji, že zadanou bakalá řskou práci jsem vypracovala samostatn ě pod vedením doc. RNDr. Zde ňka Szczyrby, Ph.D. a také, že jsem veškerou použitou literaturu a zdroje uvedla v seznamu použité literatury. V Olomouci dne 7. 5. 2009 ………………………….. podpis autora 2 Na tomto míst ě bych ráda pod ěkovala doc. RNDr. Zde ňku Szczyrbovi, Ph.D. za jeho cenné rady a pomoc p ři zpracování bakalá řské práce. 3 4 5 OBSAH 1 ÚVOD............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Úvod a cíl práce ...................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Literatura a zdroje vztahující se k zájmovému území ............................................ 7 1.3 Metodika práce ....................................................................................................... 9 2 VYMEZENÍ OBLASTI............................................................................................... 11 3 P ŘÍRODNÍ POM ĚRY................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Geomorfologie...................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Klimatologie a hydrologie
    [Show full text]
  • Orthognathe, Cribellate Und Haplogyne Familien, Pholcidae, Zodariidae, Mimetidae Sowie Argiopifor- Mia (Ohne Linyphiidae S.I.) (Arachnida: Araneida)
    © Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 69 Beiträge zur Spinnenfauna von Nordtirol — 2: Orthognathe, cribellate und haplogyne Familien, Pholcidae, Zodariidae, Mimetidae sowie Argiopifor- mia (ohne Linyphiidae s.I.) (Arachnida: Araneida). Mit Bemerkungen zur Spinnenfauna der Ostalpen* Von Konrad THALER Synopsis: On the Araneida of North Tyrol — 2. Orthognathous, cribellate and haplogyne families, Pholci- dae, Zodariidae, Mimetidae and Argiopiformia (Linyphiidae s.I. excepted). With notes on the spiders of the East Alps (Arachnida: Araneida). — Ca. 154 spider species from 18 families recorded from North Tyrol in the period 1867—1992 have been enumerated and reexamined, together with the pertinent literature. As a result, 129 species are accepted as autochthonous, 4 species might be due to casual introductions only, and 5 Araneidae might have become extinct since 1867 (Neoscona adianta, Singa hamata) and 1950 respectively (Agalenatea redii, Cyclosa oculata, Gibbaranea bituberculata). From the evidence available, 16 further species are rejected for the arachnofauna of North Tyrol. The distribution of the species is shown together with short notes on habitat and distribution in altitude and additional references to taxonomy and biology. The occurrence of further 8 families in the East Alps is indicated briefly (Eresidae, Filistatidae, Oecobiidae, Zoropsidae, Leptonetidae, Loxoscelidae, Mysmenidae, Theridiosomatidae). Inhalt 1. Einleitung 70 2. Vorgangsweise und Dank 70 2.1 System, Reihung der Familien 70 2.2 Literatur 71 2.3 Bewertung, Vorkommen in N-Tirol 72 2.4 Dank 72 3. Ergebnisse 72 3.1 Faunistische Bilanz 72 3.2 Regionaler Erforschungsstand, Habitatverteilung 74 3.3 Tiergeographie, Faunenelemente, Verbreitungsgrenzen 74 4. Spezielle Faunistik 75 4.1 Atypidae 75 4.2 Amaurobiidae 76 4.3 Dictynidae 77 — Eresidae 80 — Filistatidae 80 — Oecobiidae 80 4.4 Titanoecidae 80 4.5 Uloboridae 81 — Zoropsidae 82 4.6 Dysderidae 82 — Leptonetidae 84 — Loxoscelidae 84 4.7 Oonopidae 84 * 1: Veröff.
    [Show full text]