Iraq Assessment 2020: Foreign Policy and Expectations for 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Iraq Assessment 2020: Foreign Policy and Expectations for 2021 ANALYSIS 277 January 2021 IRAQ ASSESSMENT 2020: FOREIGN POLICY AND EXPECTATIONS FOR 2021 SALIH BERKE ŞENDAĞ I ALPER CEZMI ÖZDEMIR ANALYSISANALİZ Konu Başlığı JanuaryOcak 2021 2021 26 277 Copyright Ankara - TURKEY ORSAM © 2021 Content of this publication is copyrighted to ORSAM. Except reasonable and partial quotation and use under the Act No. 5846, Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works, via proper citation, the content may not be used or re-published without prior permission by ORSAM. The views expressed in this publication reflect only the opinions of its authors and do not represent the institutional opinion of ORSAM. Publication Date: 10 February 2021 Center for Middle Eastern Studies Adress : Mustafa Kemal Mah. 2128 Sk. No: 3 Çankaya, ANKARA Phone : +90 850 888 15 20 Email : [email protected] Photos : Anadolu Agency (AA) According to the second paragraph of Article 5 of the Regulation on Banderole Application Procedures and Principles, the use of banderole for this publication is not compulsory. ANALYSIS 277 January 2021 IRAQ ASSESSMENT 2020: FOREIGN POLICY AND EXPECTATIONS FOR 2021 About the Authors Salih Berke Şendağ Salih Berke Sendag graduated from the Middle East Technical University (METU) and the State University of New York (SUNY Binghamton) with a dual Bachelor of Arts degree in Global Politics and International Relations in 2019. In the same year, he began a master’s degree programme (with thesis) in Middle East Studies at the Middle East Technical University, Graduate School of Social Sciences. He is cur- rently working as a research assistant in the Department of Iraq Studies at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies (ORSAM). His general areas of interest include national identity building in the Middle East, political Islam, and US-Middle East relations. Alper Cezmi Özdemir Alper Cezmi Özdemir earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science and International Relations from Bahçeşehir University. At the same time, he completed his minor studies in the Department of Sociology. Between 2017 and 2019, he worked as a research assistant at the Center of Migration and Urban Studies of Bahçeşehir University (BAUMUS). At BAUMUS, he was involved in research on Syrian refugees in Turkey and the Turkish refugee regime. He completed his postgraduate studies in International Relations at the University of Chicago, where he went as a Fulbright Scholar in 2020. While in Chicago, he was involved in academic projects on the propaganda strategies of militant organisations such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda at the Chicago Project on Security and Threats (CPOST). He is currently working as a research assistant in the Department of Iraq Studies at ORSAM. CONTENTS 5 INTRODUCTION 6 FOREIGN POLICY: SOVEREIGNTY, BALANCE AND COOPERATION 8 IRAQ-IRAN RELATIONS 10 IRAQ-US RELATIONS 13 TURKEY-IRAQ RELATIONS 15 IRAQ’S RELATIONS WITH THE GULF STATES AND THE ARAB WORLD 18 IRAQ-EUROPEAN UNION RELATIONS 20 IRAQ-CHINA RELATIONS 22 IRAQ-RUSSIA RELATIONS 24 CONCLUSION AND EXPECTATIONS FOR 2O21 INTRODUCTION ustafa al-Kadhimi, who became the lands and Belgium. Considering the effects fifth Prime Minister of Iraq in the post- of the current coronavirus pandemic, the fact M 2005 period, after forming the gov- that Prime Minister al-Kadhimi and his Minis- ernment on May 6, 2020, showed that Iraqi ters visited 15 different countries in a span of foreign policy would be built upon three basic eight months, clearly demonstrates that the principles as laid out in the government pro- Iraqi government pursues an active foreign gramme submitted to the Parliament: “sover- policy and diplomacy. eignty, balance and cooperation”. According- In fact, following the formation of the new ly, Prime Minister al-Kadhimi, during the first government, Baghdad became a popular eight months of his tenure, made diplomatic stop for many Foreign Ministers in the Middle visits to Iran, the USA, Jordan, France, Ger- East. Within eight months, the Foreign Minis- many, the United Kingdom and Turkey, re- ters of Kuwait, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Finland, spectively, and concluded 2020 with another France, and Greece paid visits to Baghdad, visit to Jordan and met with King Abdullah. not to mention the high-profile visits of Egyp- In the meantime, Foreign Minister Fuad Hus- tian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly and sein, Minister of Finance Ali Allawi, Minister French President Emmanuel Macron. During of Oil Ihsan Abdul Jabbar and Head of Hashd the same period, Iraqi diplomats placed equal al-Shaabi Council, Faleh al-Fayyad, and other importance on communication with region- high-profile people, engaged in intense diplo- al and global supra-state actors in addition macy and visited, in addition to the aforemen- to interstate relations. For instance, Foreign tioned countries, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, Minister Fuad Hussein met with Jens Stolten- Bahrain, Lebanon, Syria, Russia, the Nether- berg, the NATO Secretary General, and Josep www.orsam.org.tr 5 ANALYSIS Iraq Assessment 2020: Foreign Policy and Expectations for 2021 January 2021 277 Borrell, Vice President of the European Com- FOREIGN POLICY: SOVEREIGNTY, mission, and the High Representative of the BALANCE AND COOPERATION Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy in As explained in the government pro- Belgium and paid a visit to Egypt to meet with gramme approved on May 6, 2020, the Prime Ahmed Aboul Gheit, the Secretary General of Minister promised that the foreign policy the Arab League. He also had a meeting with would be based on the principles of “sover- Dr. Nayef Falah M. Al-Hajraf, the Secretary eignty, balance and cooperation”. The Prime General of the Cooperation Council for the Minister paid special attention to the principle Arab States of the Gulf, in addition to bilateral of sovereignty and constantly emphasized meetings with the Foreign Ministers of Oman, in his press conferences that the sovereign- Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and South Korea during ty rights would be their red line. Indeed, the the same summit. government programme approved in the Prime Minister al-Kadhimi and his min- parliament states that Iraqi lands cannot be isters usually focused on the ongoing fight used as a battlefield for global wars and that against ISIS, the coronavirus pandemic, fall- Iraqi lands cannot be used for any attack on ing Brent oil prices, the financial recession and any neighboring country.1 The fact that Iraq other problems affecting Iraq and the regional became the basis of escalating tensions be- conjecture. During his meetings with his Eu- tween the USA and Iran in late 2019 and ear- ropean peers, al-Kadhimi praised Germany, ly 2020, and how these two countries com- France and the United Kingdom, all a part of pletely ignored the sovereignty of Iraq, makes the International Coalition, for their support to the great importance the new government Iraq in the fight against ISIS and encouraged attaches to the sovereignty in foreign policy those countries to invest in Iraq. During his even more meaningful. European tour, Al-Kadhimi shared the details Balance, which is another foreign policy of his economic reform plan with European principle, implies that Iraq refuses to position investors and public. In a similar manner, al- itself according to any regional or internation- Kadhimi thanked Iran and the USA for their ef- al axis and that the country is committed to forts against ISIS and expressed his desire for building positive and constructive relations stronger relations with them. Especially, the with the whole world, particularly Muslim dialogues ongoing with the important players countries, and the neighbouring Arab coun- of Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia for tries. In this way, it was thought that the princi- oil and energy, raise the question whether the ple of balance in foreign policy making would policy of balance adopted by Iraq is now be- pave the way for the cooperation factor, and it ing tipped in favor of the Arab world. Never- was stated that Iraq aimed to cooperate with theless, since the fight against ISIS is not over all international actors in accordance with yet, security issues are still at the forefront of common interests, regardless of any axis. any discussions Iraqi politicians have with for- eign players. Despite this fact, it is noteworthy The foreign policy principles followed by that the al-Kadhimi government opted for an the Kadhimi government are largely consis- economic diplomacy to encourage invest- tent with the foreign policy principles adopted ment in Iraq’s oil and energy areas during their by the governments of Adil Abdul-Mahdi and meetings. Haider al-Abadi, the predecessors of Musta- 1 “Iraq’s Parliament Approves Government Programme”, Government of Iraq, 2020. 6 www.orsam.org.tr Salih Berke Şendağ I Alper Cezmi Özdemir fa al-Kadhimi. Indeed, ’Haider rights for nearly fifteen years as al-Abadi took steps to reposition a journalist and editor, and thus Iraqi foreign policy after al-Mali- had the chance to personally ki’s term in office; he stated that observe and analyze the change they would pursue a policy of in Iraqi foreign policy after the not being part of any axis or al- Maliki era. Indeed, in some of liances in the Middle East, and the articles he wrote on Al-Mon- in this direction, he committed itor during his term, Mustafa al- to developing close relations Kadhimi criticized the foreign with Iraq’s neighbors and part- policy approach based on the ners, especially the Arab coun- personal feelings of the political The foreign tries. Both Haider al-Abadi and elites and strongly opposed the policy principles Adil Abdul-Mahdi declared that axis politics.2 During the same followed by they could not accept any threat period, Kadhimi stressed that “in the Kadhimi of attack on Iran from Iraqi ter- order for Iraq to become an im- government ritory, and neighboring Iran is portant actor in the international are largely an indispensable partner for arena, it should pursue a policy consistent with Iraq.
Recommended publications
  • Summary Report
    United Nations Alliance of Civilizations Group of Friends Ministerial Meeting New York, 24 September 2008 Summary Report The Alliance of Civilizations Group of Friends (GoF) Ministerial Meeting took place on September 24, 2008, focusing on the prospects of the Alliance over the next five years and some of the key challenges ahead as it endeavors to efficiently address growing cultural divides. The ministerial deliberations will guide the High Representative in the later development of the Alliance’s 2nd Implementation Plan beyond 2009, to be presented after the Second Forum, which the Turkish Government will host in early April 2009. Prior to the meeting, the High Representative had shared preliminary thoughts on the Alliance’s future in a draft annotated agenda (circulated to participants) and suggested the following core sub-themes for discussion: 1) preventive diplomacy and the role of the Alliance in peace building and conflict prevention at large, namely through city diplomacy; 2) promotion of peace and effective engagement with religious communities; 3) the Alliance as a platform to work differently on divisive issues. In addition, participants were invited to share views on the National Strategies for Cross-Cultural Dialogue. The Ministers, in turn, took the opportunity to report on national developments, in particular the appointment of Focal Points for the Alliance-related matters and the implementation of initiatives in line with the Alliance’s objectives. I. Opening Remarks 1.1 The Secretary-General of the United Nations opened the Ministerial Meeting with welcoming remarks to the newcomers in the Group of Friends, and to the distinguished delegates. His main reflection on the Alliance’s role and objectives ahead included1 the following: • The Alliance has a unique opportunity to overcome divisions and build trust in the world through political, financial and strategic support provided by the growing community of Friends.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventy-First Session Seventy-First Year Items 15, 17, 34, 60, 109 and 127 of the Provisional Agenda*
    United Nations A/71/366–S/2016/723 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 August 2016 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventy-first session Seventy-first year Items 15, 17, 34, 60, 109 and 127 of the provisional agenda* The role of the United Nations in promoting a new global human order Macroeconomic policy questions The situation in the Middle East Permanent sovereignty of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and of the Arab population in the occupied Syrian Golan over their natural resources Measures to eliminate international terrorism Cooperation between the United Nations and regional and other organizations Letter dated 19 August 2016 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Mauritania to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to forward to you a letter dated 14 August 2016 from the Secretary-General of the League of Arab States, Ahmed Aboul Gheit, to which are attached the resolutions issued by the Arab League Council at its 27th ordinary session, held at the summit level in Nouakchott on 25 July 2016 (see annex). I should be grateful if the present letter and its annex could be circulated as a document of the seventy-first session of the General Assembly, under items 15, 17, 34, 60, 109 and 127 of the provisional agenda, and of the Security Council. (Signed) El Hacen Eleyatt Chargé d’affaires a.i. Chairman of the 27th ordinary session of the Arab League Council held at the summit level in Mauritania on 25 July 2016 * A/71/150.
    [Show full text]
  • Turmoil in the Middle East
    Turmoil in the Middle East Standard Note: SN/IA/5902 Last updated: 28 March 2011 Author: Ben Smith Section International Affairs and Defence Section This note looks at the instability in the Middle East and North Africa since the Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings. Source: worldmap.org This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public. Contents 1 Tunisia and Egypt 3 2 Algeria 4 2.1 Background 4 2.2 Unrest in 2011 5 2.3 Algeria basic information 5 3 Bahrain 6 3.1 Increasing repression 7 3.2 Unrest in 2011 8 3.3 Saudi forces move in 9 3.4 Bahrain- Basic information 9 4 Iran 10 4.1 Unrest in 2011 10 4.2 Iran- basic information 11 5 Jordan 11 5.1 Unrest in 2011 11 5.2 Jordan- basic information 12 6 Libya 13 6.1 Unrest in 2011 14 6.2 International reaction 15 6.3 Refugees 17 6.4 Libya- basic information 17 7 Morocco 18 7.1 Morocco- basic information
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining US Strategy in the Middle East
    REIMAGININGR I A I I G U.S.S STRATEGYT A E Y IIN THET E MMIDDLED L EEASTS Sustainable Partnerships, Strategic Investments Dalia Dassa Kaye, Linda Robinson, Jeffrey Martini, Nathan Vest, Ashley L. Rhoades C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA958-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0662-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover composite design: Jessica Arana Image: wael alreweie / Getty Images Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Policy Framework for Iraq's Petroleum Industry and An
    Towards a Policy Framework for Iraq’s Petroleum Industry and an Integrated Federal Energy Strategy Submitted by Luay Jawad al-Khatteeb To the University of Exeter As a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Middle East Politics In January 2017 The thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgment. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature ......................................................... i Abstract: The “Policy Framework for Iraq’s Petroleum Industry” is a logical structure that establishes the rules to guide decisions and manage processes to achieve economically efficient outcomes within the energy sector. It divides policy applications between regulatory and regulated practices, and defines the governance of the public sector across the petroleum industry and relevant energy portfolios. In many “Rentier States” where countries depend on a single source of income such as oil revenues, overlapping powers of authority within the public sector between policy makers and operators has led to significant conflicts of interest that have resulted in the mismanagement of resources and revenues, corruption, failed strategies and the ultimate failure of the system. Some countries have succeeded in identifying areas for progressive reform, whilst others failed due to various reasons discussed in this thesis. Iraq fits into the category of a country that has failed to implement reform and has become a classic case of a rentier state.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Inherent Resolve Lead Inspector General Report to the United States Congress
    OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS JANUARY 1, 2021–MARCH 31, 2021 FRONT MATTER ABOUT THIS REPORT A 2013 amendment to the Inspector General Act established the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) framework for oversight of overseas contingency operations and requires that the Lead IG submit quarterly reports to the U.S. Congress on each active operation. The Chair of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency designated the DoD Inspector General (IG) as the Lead IG for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). The DoS IG is the Associate IG for the operation. The USAID IG participates in oversight of the operation. The Offices of Inspector General (OIG) of the DoD, the DoS, and USAID are referred to in this report as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to oversight of OIR. The Lead IG agencies collectively carry out the Lead IG statutory responsibilities to: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight of the operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of programs and operations of the U.S. Government in support of the operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, investigations, or evaluations. • Report quarterly to Congress and the public on the operation and on activities of the Lead IG agencies. METHODOLOGY To produce this quarterly report, the Lead IG agencies submit requests for information to the DoD, the DoS, USAID, and other Federal agencies about OIR and related programs. The Lead IG agencies also gather data and information from other sources, including official documents, congressional testimony, policy research organizations, press conferences, think tanks, and media reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurds Kidnapped the Day While Maintaining the Ban on Its Civil Servants
    INSTITUT KURDDE PARIS E Information and liaison bulletin N°425 AUGUST 2020 The publication of this Bulletin enjoys a subsidy from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Culture & City of Paris ______________ This bulletin is issued in French and English Price per issue : France: 6 € — Abroad : 7,5 € Annual subscribtion (12 issues) France : 60 € — Elsewhere : 75 € Monthly review Directeur de la publication : Mohamad HASSAN ISBN 0761 1285 INSTITUT KURDE, 106, rue La Fayette - 75010 PARIS Tel. : 01-48 24 64 64 - Fax : 01-48 24 64 66 www.fikp.org E-mail: [email protected] Information and liaison bulletin Kurdish Institute of Paris Bulletin N° 425 August 2020 • IRAQ: TWO OFFICERS OF THE IRAQI BORDER GUARDS KILLED BY A TURKISH DRONE • ROJAVA: KIDNAPPING, TORTURE, RAPE, MURDER... EVIDENCE OF THE CRIMES OF THE TURKISH OCCUPATION FORCES IS ACCUMULATING • TURKEY: EXACTIONS AGAINST WOMEN ARE MULTIPLE • IRAN: MASS TWITTER CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE ASSASSINATION OF KOLBARS, CALL FOR THE ACQUITTAL OF A KURDISH TEACHER • KURDISH LANGUAGE, PUBLICATIONS IRAQ: TWO OFFICERS OF THE IRAQI BORDER GUARDS KILLED BY A TURKISH DRONE ince the reopening of the to the Region from several Health called on cured patients to borders with Iran last countries, while conversely, donate their plasma for patients May, both Iraq and Turkey stopped flights to the developing severe forms of the Kurdistan are Region. Passengers leaving the infection. After more than twenty experiencing a dramatic Region must show a negative cases appeared, two villages in S increase in the figures of COVID test of less than 48 hours Akre district (Dohuk) were placed the pandemic..
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Foreign Policy (Special Reference After the 25Th of January Revolution)
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS POLÍTICAS Y SOCIOLOGÍA DEPARTAMENTO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PÚBLICO Y RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES TESIS DOCTORAL Egyptian foreign policy (special reference after The 25th of January Revolution) MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTORA PRESENTADA POR Rania Ahmed Hemaid DIRECTOR Najib Abu-Warda Madrid, 2018 © Rania Ahmed Hemaid, 2017 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID Facultad de Ciencias Políticas Y Socioligía Departamento de Derecho Internacional Público y Relaciones Internacionales Doctoral Program Political Sciences PHD dissertation Egyptian Foreign Policy (Special Reference after The 25th of January Revolution) POLÍTICA EXTERIOR EGIPCIA (ESPECIAL REFERENCIA DESPUÉS DE LA REVOLUCIÓN DEL 25 DE ENERO) Elaborated by Rania Ahmed Hemaid Under the Supervision of Prof. Dr. Najib Abu- Warda Professor of International Relations in the Faculty of Information Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid Madrid, 2017 Ph.D. Dissertation Presented to the Complutense University of Madrid for obtaining the doctoral degree in Political Science by Ms. Rania Ahmed Hemaid, under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Najib Abu- Warda Professor of International Relations, Faculty of Information Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid. University: Complutense University of Madrid. Department: International Public Law and International Relations (International Studies). Program: Doctorate in Political Science. Director: Prof. Dr. Najib Abu- Warda. Academic Year: 2017 Madrid, 2017 DEDICATION Dedication To my dearest parents may god rest their souls in peace and to my only family my sister whom without her support and love I would not have conducted this piece of work ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Prof. Dr. Najib Abu- Warda for the continuous support of my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of US-Iraq Relations
    The Future of US-Iraq Relations Ellen Laipson The Future of US-Iraq Relations Ellen Laipson Copyright © 2010 The Henry L. Stimson Center ISBN: 978-0-9845211-0-4 Cover photos: USAID, US Army, US Department of Defense Book and cover design by Shawn Woodley An electronic version of this publication is available at: www.stimson.org/swa All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from The Henry L. Stimson Center. The Henry L. Stimson Center 1111 19th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.223.5956 Fax: 202.238.9604 www.stimson.org Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................v Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................vi Introduction ............................................................................................................vii Iraq-US Relations in 2010: A Time of Transition ......................................................1 Security Relations Still Dominant .....................................................................2 The Civilian Surge ............................................................................................4 US Embassy Baghdad ................................................................................8 The Human Cost of the War: Refugees and Veterans ........................................9 Efforts to Help Returning
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is the Egyptian Regime Demonizing Palestinians?
    [email protected] www.al-shabaka.org al-shabaka commentary WHY IS THE EGYPTIAN REGIME DEMONIZING PALESTINIANS? By Haidar Eid August 2013 Palestinians know that if Cairo sneezes then Palestine, especially Gaza, is first to get the flu. Indeed, Gaza often serves as a tool of regime policy, as was the case during the Mubarak years and during the short-lived government led by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party, and is still the case with the current regime since July 2013. The Mubarak regime’s policy towards Gaza was generally repressive. It participated in Israel’s draconian siege of the enclave, underway since 2006, and was fully complicit in Israel’s brutal offensive against Gaza in 2008-9. Former Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit was standing next to his Israeli counterpart Tzipi Livni when she declared war on Gaza during her visit to Cairo in 2008. Aboul Gheit went so far as to threaten to break the legs of the Palestinians of Gaza if they “encroached on Egypt’s national security” after they breached the border wall with Egypt, seeking to buy medicines and other necessary supplies in Al-Arish City. Naturally, such a repressive policy had to involve demonization of the Gaza Palestinians, painting them all as members of Hamas. Hamas had great expectations of change after the downfall of the Mubarak regime, including the permanent opening of the Rafah Crossing and the free passage of people and goods, thus eliminating the need for the tunnels connecting Gaza to Egypt. Some optimists further hoped that the efforts for reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah would finally bear fruit, given that the Mubarak regime had been biased towards Fatah.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Dated 20 January 2021 from the President of the Security Council
    United Nations S/2021/66 Security Council Distr.: General 21 January 2021 Original: English Letter dated 20 January 2021 from the President of the Security Council addressed to the Secretary-General and the Permanent Representatives of the members of the Security Council I have the honour to enclose herewith a copy of the briefings provided by Ms. Rosemary DiCarlo, Under-Secretary-General for Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, and His Excellency Mr. Ahmed Aboul Gheit, Secretary-General of the League of Arab States, as well as the statements delivered by His Excellency Mr. Othman Jerandi, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Tunisia, and by the representatives of China, Estonia, France, India, Ireland, Kenya, Mexico, the Niger, Norway, the Russian Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and Viet Nam, in connection with the video-teleconference on “Cooperation between the United Nations and regional and subregional organizations in maintaining international peace and security: League of Arab States” convened on Monday, 18 January 2021. A statement was also delivered by His Excellency Mr. Anwar bin Mohammed Gargash, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates. In accordance with the procedure set out in the letter by the President of the Security Council addressed to permanent representatives of the members of the Security Council dated 7 May 2020 (S/2020/372), which was agreed in the light of the extraordinary circumstances caused by the coronavirus disease pandemic, these briefing and statements will be issued as an official document of the Security Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq and the Kurds: Resolving the Kirkuk Crisis
    IRAQ AND THE KURDS: RESOLVING THE KIRKUK CRISIS Middle East Report N°64 – 19 April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION: GROWING TENSIONS............................................................... 1 II. A TRAINWRECK IN THE MAKING.......................................................................... 2 A. NORMALISATION ...................................................................................................................2 B. THE ARTICLE 140 COMMITTEE ..............................................................................................4 C. THE ILL-CONSIDERED PUSH FOR A REFERENDUM IN 2007.......................................................7 D. FALL-OUT FROM FAILURE......................................................................................................9 III. THE NEED FOR A PROCESS.................................................................................... 11 IV. THE PATH TO A SETTLEMENT ............................................................................. 15 A. THE UNITED STATES AND TURKEY ......................................................................................15 B. OUTLINES OF A GLOBAL SOLUTION......................................................................................17 V. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................. 19 APPENDICES A. MAP OF IRAQ ......................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]