DOCSLIB.ORG

Newaps News Nov 2005 1.Qxp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Newaps News Nov 2005 1.Qxp November 2005 NEWS Volume 14, No. 10 A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews Legal, Financial Issues Impact Famous Equation Holds Big Birthday Celebration APS Name Change Decision t its September 24 meet- of the name change, and 6.5% were ing, the APS Executive moderately opposed. The remain- ABoard grappled with the ing 6.6% were neutral. issue of whether or not to recom- At the September meeting, the mend changing the name of APS to Board heard expert opinion on the American Physics Society. sobering legal and trademark issues. As reported in the August/ Changing the name legally would September APS News, that issue require re-incorporation of the had been the subject of an informal Society, and potentially renegotia- email survey sent out to the entire tion of many contracts, and rereg- APS membership, in which 23.9% istering APS as the publisher of the of those who were asked for an Physical Review in numerous inter- opinion responded. Of these, 51.3% national jurisdictions. If the name Photo credit:Kendra Rand were strongly in favor of the name were not changed legally, but APS 2 change, primarily because the word merely chose to do business under September 27, 1905 was the day that Einstein's paper containing the equation E=mc arrived at the “physical” does not clearly con- the name American Physics editorial offices of Annalen der Physik. Exactly one hundred years later, a reception and preview showing note physics, and thereby limits the Society, APS could still lose the of the docudrama "Einstein's Big Idea" were held at the National Academy of Sciences building across 2 effectiveness of APS in its lobby- trademark rights to “American from the Mall in Washington. About six hundred attendees sampled E=mc birthday cake, watched the pre- ing and public outreach activities. Physical Society”, which would be view, and listened to a panel discussion about the equation and the making of the docudrama. The event But 11.5% of the respondents potentially damaging especially in was sponsored by the Department of Energy, Universities Research Association, the APS, the National were strongly opposed, many the area of journal publication. The Academies, and Washington PBS station WETA. because the word “physical” was Board considered using both The panel was moderated by APS President Marvin Cohen (in broader than “physics”, and there- names, depending on the context, the photo at extreme right).Other panelists included (l to r): fore helped APS include among its but concluded (as did most of the Paula S. Apsell, the Senior Executive Producer of NOVA and the members those working in interdis- respondents in the survey) that it Director of the Science Unit of WGBH in Boston; Walter Isaacson, ciplinary areas. would probably be too complicat- President and CEO of the Aspen Institute and former Managing In addition, 24.1% of those par- ed and confusing. Editor of TIME, who is at work on an Einstein biography; David Kaiser, associate professor of the history of science in MIT’s ticipating were moderately in favor APS Name Change continued on page 3 Program in Science, Technology, and Society; Gary Johnstone, Producer/Director/Writer of "Einstein’s Big Idea"; and David Apker Award Finalists Bodanis, author of the book E=mc2, on which "Einstein's Big Idea" is based. "Einstein's Big Idea" aired on NOVA on PBS Photo credit: Alan Chodos stations around the country on Tuesday, October 11, at 8 pm. With One Data Set Analyzed, Einstein@Home Forges Ahead in Search for Gravitational Waves By Ernie Tretkoff Interferometer Gravitational Wave Einstein@home is now searching The Einstein@home distrib- Observatory, which consists of two through data from the more sensi- uted computing effort, which facilities, one located in Livingston, tive science run S4. In late 2005, searches for gravitational waves, Louisiana and the other in Hanford, LIGO will begin a long data-taking recently finished analyzing its Washington. run, S5, at its design sensitivity, first set of scientific data. Over In August Einstein@home fin- and Einstein@home will analyze Photo credit: Shelly Johnston 60,000 individuals from over 150 ished sifting through data from that data when it becomes available. The Apker Award is given annually for undergraduate research in two countries are now running LIGO’s science run S3, which ran Gravitational waves, often categories. One award is for a student doing his or her research at an Einstein@home on their comput- from late 2003 to early 2004. Gravitational Waves continued on page 5 institution that grants the PhD degree; the other is for research at an ers, and more people are joining institution that does not grant the PhD. The selection committee picks every day. OPA’s Regan Spearheads Efforts to six finalists from the submitted nominations, and then interviews the Begun earlier this year as part of finalists in a daylong session to make its recommendations for the the World Year of Physics, Develop New Grassroots Program recipients. These recommendations are then forwarded to the APS Einstein@home is a distributed Executive Board for final approval. This year the interviews took place computing project, which relies on The APS Office of Public on September 8 at the Cosmos Club in Washington. The six finalists were volunteers’ donated computing Affairs (OPA) is instituting a (l to r): Nathaniel Craig (Harvard); Cary Pint (University of Northern time. While a user’s computer is new District Advocate Iowa); Matthew Paoletti (Bucknell); David Miller (University of idle, the Einstein@home program Program that will assign an Chicago); Jeffrey Falkenbach (MIT); and Eliot Kapit (Reed College). searches for gravitational waves in APS member as point person The recipients will be reported in next month's APS News. data from LIGO, the Laser in each Congressional district. The goal of the new program Three Physicists Share 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics is to build a volunteer net- work of district and state advo- Two APS fellows–Roy Glauber honored “for his contribution to the has long been aware of the stature cates within the physics com- of Harvard University and John L. quantum theory of optical coher- of these three great physicists,” said munity to facilitate the Hall of NIST/University of ence.” Hall and Hänsch each col- Cohen, adding that all had been Society’s grassroots activities, Photo credit: Brian Mosley Colorado–shared the 2005 Nobel lected a quarter of the prize, and honored with APS prizes. Glauber according to Kimberly Regan, Kimberly Regan Prize for physics with Theodor were honored “for their contribu- won the 1996 Dannie Heinemann the new science policy fellow who can then contact other scientists Hänsch of the Max Planck Institut tions to the development of laser- Prize; Hänsch won the 1996 Arthur at OPA. in their district to take action, whether für Quantenoptik. The prize was based precision spectroscopy, Schawlow Prize and the 1986 “We thought that having a con- it be contacting a Congressional announced on October 4. All three including the optical frequency Herbert P. Broida Prize; and Hall stituent representative in each district office, or circulating a departmental recipients’ prize-winning work is comb technique.” won the Schawlow Prize in 1993 would be a great way to ensure that letter within their university. linked to landmark papers pub- Both APS President Marvin and the Davisson-Germer Prize in the voices of individual scientists The DA program is still in its lished by the Physical Review and Cohen and APS Editor-in-Chief 1988. are heard,” explains Regan, who early days. Regan is in the process Physical Review Letters. Martin Blume extended their con- Glauber laid the foundations of joined the OPAin August. Whenever of recruiting the first 50 volunteers. Glauber received half of the gratulations to the recipients on quantum optics, showing how the a policy issue arises, the OPA can There are currently 20 members so roughly $1.3 million prize; he was behalf of the Society. “The APS Nobel Prize continued on page 4 contact the local district advocates, OPA's Reagan continued on page 5 2 November 2005 NEWS This Month in Physics History Einstein and the EPR Paradox “Think of it almost like nano- “If we do this it has worldwide y the 1920s, it had distance of the two parts. Velcro.” consequences, and it will stir up become clear to most One of the principal features –Ali Dhinojwala, University of some kind of hornet’s nest.” Bphysicists that classical of quantum mechanics is the Akron, on synthetic gecko hairs he –Burton Richter, Stanford mechanics could not fully notion of uncertainty: not all the developed, The New York Times, University, on a Secretary of Energy describe the world of atoms, classical physical observable prop- August 30, 2005 Advisory Board report that recom- especially the notion of “quan- erties of a system can be simulta- mends that the United States design ta” first proposed by Planck and neously determined with exact pre- “Zero-point energy is so tiny new nuclear weapons, Contra further developed by Albert cision, even in principle. Instead, that nobody can feel it. But when Costa Times, October 5, 2005 Einstein to explain the photo- there may be several sets of you get to the realm of quantum electric effect. Physics had to observable properties–position and mechanics, it exists. The question “Basically physicists are too be rebuilt, leading to the emer- momentum, for example–that can- is, how do you harness it? I have undisciplined to let anyone else tell gence of quantum theory. not both be known at the same not seen any meaningful theory or us what to name something.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESI NEWS Volume 5, Issue 2, Autumn 2010
    The Erwin Schrödinger International Boltzmanngasse 9/2 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Vienna, Austria ESI NEWS Volume 5, Issue 2, Autumn 2010 Editorial nized by A. Rebhan (Vienna), S. Husa Contents (Univ. Illes Balears, Spain) and K. Land- Klaus Schmidt steiner (IFT Madrid, Spain) and ran for Editorial1 three months from August – October 2010. This programme studied quantum chromo- Stefan Hollands: Correlators in de- dynamics (QCD), the theory of the strong Sitter spacetime and the ‘heat As many readers of nuclear interactions and focussed on the death’ of the Universe3 this newsletter will theory behind some of the expected – and know already, the year some unexpected – properties of the state Letters in Support of the ESI 10 2010 was ‘interesting’ of matter in heavy-ion collisions at the News from the ESI Community 19 for the ESI. Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Scientifically, the the Brookhaven National Laboratory in the Current and Future Activities of second half of this USA, for example. Two workshops were the ESI 22 year continued very well. The programme part of this programme, one on AdS holog- raphy and the quark-gluon plasma, and one Erwin Schrödinger Lectures 24 Matter and radiation, organized by V.Bach (Mainz), J. Fröhlich (ETH Zürich) und J. on Hot matter. More than 100 participants Senior Research Fellows’ Lecture Yngvason (Vienna) ended on July 31. Its visited the ESI for various periods of time Courses 2011 24 subject matter was the quantum mechanical during this activity. description of non-relativistic matter, with The last thematic programme in 2010 Lectures on physical and math- about 50 participating scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Nick Metropolis Edward Teller Mici Teller Arianna Rosenbluth Marshall
    Mici Teller Edward Teller Nick Metropolis Arianna Rosenbluth Marshall Rosenbluth An Interview vith Bernie Alder Bernie Alder 1997, from NERSC , part of the Stories of the Development of Large Scale Scientific Computing at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory series. It is little known that THE algorithm was independently discovered by Bernie Alder, Stan Frankel and Victor Lewinson. Quoting Alder: ..we started out with a configuration, a solid like order configuration, and then jiggled the particles according to the pulse rate distribution. And that is, in fact, known now as the Monte Carlo Method—it was presumably independently developed at Los Alamos by Teller, Metropolis, and Rosenbluth. They actually got all the credit. My guess is we did it first at Cal Tech. It's not that difficult to come up with that algorithm, which, by the way, I think is one of, if not THE, most powerful algorithms Actually, In a footnote of the original paper by Metropolis et al. they credited Alder, Frankel and Lewinson on this, but this fact has been almost forgotten over the years. Furthermore Alder et al. did not give a general formulation for the algorithm but only a specialized version for hard spheres." Radial Distribution Function Calculated by the Monte-Carlo Method for a Hard Sphere Fluid! B. J. Alder, S. P. Frankel and V. A. Lewinson 1955! The Journal of Chemical Physics, 23, 417 (1955)! The paper mentioned above. Quoting Alder:! ! I was still working on my Ph.D. thesis. He (Frankel) was really well known in computing circles. He actually put the Monte Carlo Method on the FERRANTI Computer and ran it all summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Dtra-Appeal.Pdf
    FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS T: 202/546-3300 1717 K Street NW #209 Washington, DC 20036 www.fas.org F: 202/675-1010 [email protected] Board of Sponsors (Partial List) *Sidney Altman December 12, 2003 *Philip W. Anderson *Kenneth J. Arrow (202)454-4691 *Julius Axelrod MG Trudy H. Clark, Deputy Director *David Baltimore *Baruj Benacerraf Defense Threat Reduction Agency *Hans A. Bethe *J. Michael Bishop 8725 John J. Kingman Road *Nicolaas Bloembergen *Norman Borlaug Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-6201 *Paul Boyer Ann Pitts Carter *Owen Chamberlain Morris Cohen RE: FOIA Appeal, Case No. 03-125 *Stanley Cohen Mildred Cohn *Leon N. Cooper *E. J. Corey *James Cronin Dear General Clark: *Johann Deisenhofer Ann Druyan *Renato Dulbecco John T. Edsall This is an appeal of the initial denial of my request under the Freedom of Paul R. Ehrlich George Field Information Act (FOIA) for a copy of an unclassified DTRA-funded report *Val L. Fitch *Jerome I. Friedman entitled "Lessons from the Anthrax Attacks: Implications for U.S. Bioterrorism John Kenneth Galbraith Preparedness," April 2002. A copy of the December 12, 2003 DTRA denial *Walter Gilbert *Donald Glaser letter is enclosed. *Sheldon L. Glashow Marvin L. Goldberger *Joseph L. Goldstein *Roger C. L. Guillemin I request that you reverse the initial decision and release the requested *Herbert A. Hauptman *Dudley R. Herschbach report, on the following grounds: *Roald Hoffmann John P. Holdren *David H. Hubel *Jerome Karle 1. The cited FOIA exemption 2 (High) is not applicable. In other words, it is *H. Gobind Khorana not true that the requested document, if disclosed, might be used to *Arthur Kornberg *Edwin G.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Physics in the 20Th Century As Told by Players”
    Eur. Phys. J. H 43, 337{353 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2018-90061-5 THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL H Editorial Editorial introduction to the special issue \Plasma physics in the 20th century as told by players" Patrick H. Diamond1,a , Uriel Frisch2, and Yves Pomeau3 1 University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0319, USA 2 Universit´eC^oted'Azur, OCA, Lab. Lagrange, CS 34229, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France 3 Ladhyx, Ecole´ Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France Received 31 October 2018 Published online 30 November 2018 c EDP Sciences, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature, 2018 Our ancestors lived in a world where { as far as they were aware { electrons and ions lived happily bound together. But with suitable conditions, e.g. low density and/or high temperature, electrons and ions will unbind and we obtain a plasma, a state of matter of which we became increasingly aware in the 20th century, and which pervades our universe near and far. There are also many applications of plasma physics: chip etching, TV screens, torches, propulsion, fusion (through magnetic or inertial confinement), astrophysics and space physics, and laser physics, to cite just a few. At the crossroads of electrodynamics, continuum physics, kinetic theory and nonlinear physics, plasma physics enjoys an abundance of riches. Actually, so much that we can only cover a fraction of its history in this limited volume. The history of plasma physics presented here covers mostly the period from 1950 to 2000. The issue is focussed both on fundamentals and on applications in controlled fusion through magnetic confinement, which in turn raises a host of fundamental and interesting questions in various areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Particle Physics Information
    1 Online Particle Physics Information Online Particle Physics Information 1 Introduction . 1 2 Particle Data Group (PDG) resources . 2 3 Particle Physics Information Platforms . 2 4 Literature Databases . 3 5 Particle Physics Journals and Conference Proceedings Series . 4 6 Conference Databases . 4 7 Research Institutions . 4 8 People........................................... 4 9 Experiments . 5 10 Jobs............................................ 5 11 Software Packages and Repositories . 6 11.1 Particle Physics Software . 6 11.2 Astrophysics Software . 7 11.3 Web Apps . 8 11.4 Mobile Apps . 8 12 Data repositories . 8 12.1 Particle Physics . 8 12.2 Astrophysics . 9 12.3 General Physics . 10 13 Data preservation activities . 10 13.1 Particle Physics . 10 13.2 Astrophysics . 11 14 Particle Physics Education and Outreach Sites . 11 14.1 Science Educators’ Networks . 11 14.2 Physics Courses . 12 14.3 Masterclasses . 12 14.4 General Sites . 13 14.5 General Physics Activities . 13 14.6 Particle Physics Activities . 13 14.7 Lab Education Offices . 15 14.8 Educational Programs of Experiments . 17 14.9 News . 18 14.10 Art in Physics . 19 14.11 Blogs and Twitter . 19 Revised August 2019 by M. Moskovic (CERN). 1 Introduction The collection of online information resources in particle physics and related areas presented in this chapter is of necessity incomplete. An expanded and regularly updated online version can be found at: http://library.cern/particle_physics_information Suggestions for additions and updates are very welcome.1 1Please send comments and corrections to [email protected] M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018) and 2019 update 6th December, 2019 11:48am 2 Online Particle Physics Information 2 Particle Data Group (PDG) resources • Review of Particle Physics (RPP): A comprehensive report on the fields of particle physics and related areas of cosmology and astrophysics, including both review articles and a compilation/evaluation of data on particle properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Scientists, Jewish Ethics and the Making of the Atomic Bomb
    8 Jewish Scientists, Jewish Ethics and the Making of the Atomic Bomb MERON MEDZINI n his book The Jews and the Japanese: The Successful Outsiders, Ben-Ami IShillony devoted a chapter to the Jewish scientists who played a central role in the development of nuclear physics and later in the construction and testing of the fi rst atomic bomb. He correctly traced the well-known facts that among the leading nuclear physics scientists, there was an inordinately large number of Jews (Shillony 1992: 190–3). Many of them were German, Hungarian, Polish, Austrian and even Italian Jews. Due to the rise of virulent anti-Semitism in Germany, especially after the Nazi takeover of that country in 1933, most of the German-Jewish scientists found themselves unemployed, with no laboratory facilities or even citi- zenship, and had to seek refuge in other European countries. Eventually, many of them settled in the United States. A similar fate awaited Jewish scientists in other central European countries that came under German occupation, such as Austria, or German infl uence as in the case of Hungary. Within a short time, many of these scientists who found refuge in America were highly instrumental in the exceedingly elabo- rate and complex research and work that eventually culminated in the construction of the atomic bomb at various research centres and, since 1943, at the Los Alamos site. In this facility there were a large number of Jews occupying the highest positions. Of the heads of sections in charge of the Manhattan Project, at least eight were Jewish, led by the man in charge of the operation, J.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Physics Newsletter Volume VII, No. 3, Aug. 1998 Forum Chair
    History of Physics Newsletter Volume VII, No. 3, Aug. 1998 Forum Chair From the Editor Forum News APS & AIP News Book Review Reports Forum Chair Urges APS Centennial Participation The American Physical Society celebrates its 100th anniversary in Atlanta, Georgia, at an expanded six-day meeting from March 20-26, 1999, which will be jointly sponsored by the American Association of Physics Teachers. This will be the largest meeting of physicists ever held, and the APS Forum on the History of Physics will play a central role in making it a truly memorable event. The 20th century has been the Century of Physics. The startling discoveries of X-rays, radioactivity, and the electron at the end of the 19th century opened up vast new territories for exploration and analysis. Quantum theory and relativity theory, whose consequences are far from exhausted today, formed the bedrock for subsequent developments in atomic and molecular physics, nuclear and particle physics, solid state physics, and all other domains of physics, which shaped the world in which we live in times of both peace and war. A large historical wall chart exhibiting these developments, to which members of the Forum contributed their expertise, will be on display in Atlanta. Also on display will be the well-known Einstein exhibit prepared some years ago by the American Institute of Physics Center for History of Physics. Two program sessions arranged by the Forum at the Atlanta Centennial Meeting also will explore these historic 20th-century developments. The first, chaired by Ruth H. Howes (Ball State University), will consist of the following speakers and topics: John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Fesac Finalrpt.Pdf
    OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY MANAGED BY LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY RESEARCH CORPORATION PHONE: (423) 574-5510 FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FAX: (423) 576-6118 INTERNET: [email protected] POST OFFICE BOX 2008 OAK RIDGE, TN 37831-6248 September 16, 1999 Dr. Martha A. Krebs Director, Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20858 Dear Dr. Krebs: The FESAC is pleased to be able to complete its response to your charge of October 9, 1998, in regard to … “leading a community assessment of the restructured program thus far, including recommendations for further redirection given projected flat budgets for fusion. With this assessment as background, I would like your recommendations as to the proof-of-principle experiments now under review, as well as your recommendations regarding the balance of the program between tokamak and non-tokamak physics, and between magnetic and inertial fusion energy. Working with the Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (OFES), please develop goals and metrics to use in making your recommendations. I would also welcome any other recommendations on program content, emphasis, or balance.” In discussion with Dr. N. A. Davies, Director of OFES, it was agreed to frame the sub-charges as: · Recommend a balance between MFE and IFE; · Recommend priorities in the MFE program; · Recommend priorities in the IFE program; and · Recommend a course of action for the three proof-of-principle (POP) proposals. During the past year there has been a considerable amount of activity which helped us reach our conclusions. The FESAC has visited a number of fusion sites and has heard extensive presentations on the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Iter Ita Newsletter
    ITER ITA NEWSLETTER No. 18, OCTOBER– NOVEMBER–DECEMBER 2004 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, AUSTRIA ISSN 1727–9852 COMMON MESSAGE FROM FOURTH PREPARATORY MEETING FOR ITER DECISION MAKING (IAEA, Vienna, 9 November 2004) Delegations from China, the European Union, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America met at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna on 9 November 2004 to advance the ITER negotiations. The two potential Host Parties, the European Union and Japan, presented the results of recent intensive bilat- eral discussions on the balance of roles and responsibilities of Host and non-Host in the joint realization of ITER in the frame of a six-Party international cooperation. These discussions will continue in the near future with the aim of aligning the two Parties’ views. All Parties were greatly encouraged by the positive atmosphere and expressed their optimism that the process was now proceeding effectively towards a fruitful conclusion among the six Parties in the near future. TWENTIETH IAEA FUSION ENERGY CONFERENCE 1–6 November 2004, Vilamoura, Portugal Opening Speech by Werner Burkart, Deputy Director General, IAEA Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear Participants of the Twentieth IAEA Fusion Energy Conference: On behalf of the Director General, Dr. ElBaradei, of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and on my own behalf, I welcome all participants to this 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference. Since the beginning of its support of controlled nuclear fusion in the late 1950s, the IAEA has enhanced world- wide commitment to fusion by creating awareness of the benefits of magnetic and inertial confinement.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 European Fusion Theory Conference
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME COMMITTEE F. Zonca(chair) ENEA, Italy D. Borba IST, Portugal M. Lisak VR, Sweden S. Cappello CNR, Italy V. Naulin Risø, Denmark F. Castejon CIEMAT, Spain M. Ottaviani CEA, France D. Van Eester TEC, Belgium O. Sauter CRPP, Switzerland th S. Günter IPP, Germany M. Tokar TEC, Germany 11 European J. Heikkinen Tekes, Finland M. Vlad INFLPR, Romania P. Helander UKAEA, UK Fusion Theory Conference Organised by: Association EURATOM-CEA and Université de Provence IMPORTANT DATES 30 April 2005 Deadline for submission of abstracts 15 June 2005 Information for contributors 30 June 2005 Deadline for registration and hotel reservation 26 -28 September 2005 11th EFTC LOCAL ORGANISING COMMITTEE M. Ottaviani (chairman) P. Beyer H. Capes A. Corso-Leclercq T. Hutter (scientific secretary) G. Huysmans (webmaster) R. Stamm Mailing Address: Mrs. A. Corso-Leclercq 11th EFTC Conference Secretariat 26 -28 September 2005 DRFC/SCCP/G2IC, bât. 513, Conference Centre CEA Cadarache, Aix-en-Provence, France 13108 St-Paul-lez-Durance, France Website : http://www-fusion-magnetique.cea.fr/eftc11/index.html E-mail : [email protected] Announcement and Call for Abstracts Photos by J-C Carbone SUBJECT MATTER A confirmation of receipt will be sent by e-mail within a week. Submissions printed on paper should be made only if severe problems The 11th European Fusion Theory Conference will be held in Aix-en- arise with electronic submission. The Scientific Committee will select the Provence in the south of France from the 26th to the 28th of September contributions on the basis of the submitted abstracts. Authors will be 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert
    SE0100262 TRITA-A Report ISSN 1102-2051 VETENSKAP OCH ISRN KTH/ALF/--01/4--SE IONST KTH Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert Research and Training programme on CONTROLLED THERMONUCLEAR FUSION AND PLASMA PHYSICS (Association EURATOM/NFR) FUSION PLASMA PHYSICS ALFV N LABORATORY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK TRITA-ALF-2001-04 ISRN KTH/ALF/--01/4--SE Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Research During Half a Century Bo Lehnert VETENSKAP OCH KONST Stockholm, June 2001 The Alfven Laboratory Division of Fusion Plasma Physics Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden (Association EURATOM/NFR) Printed by Alfven Laboratory Fusion Plasma Physics Division Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION RESEARCH DURING HALF A CENTURY Bo Lehnert Alfven Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden ABSTRACT A review is given on the historical development of research on plasma physics and controlled fusion. The potentialities are outlined for fusion of light atomic nuclei, with respect to the available energy resources and the environmental properties. Various approaches in the research on controlled fusion are further described, as well as the present state of investigation and future perspectives, being based on the use of a hot plasma in a fusion reactor. Special reference is given to the part of this work which has been conducted in Sweden, merely to identify its place within the general historical development. Considerable progress has been made in fusion research during the last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Got Moseley's Prize?
    Chapter 4 Who Got Moseley’s Prize? Virginia Trimble1 and Vera V. Mainz*,2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4575, United States 2Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, United States *E-mail: [email protected]. Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley (1887-1915) made prompt and very skilled use of the then new technique of X-ray scattering by crystals (Bragg scattering) to solve several problems about the periodic table and atoms. He was nominated for both the chemistry and physics Nobel Prizes by Svante Arrhenius in 1915, but was dead at Gallipoli before the committees finished their deliberations. Instead, the 1917 physics prize (announced in 1918 and presented on 6 June 1920) went to Charles Glover Barkla (1877-1944) “for discovery of the Röntgen radiation of the elements.” This, and his discovery of X-ray polarization, were done with earlier techniques that he never gave up. Moseley’s contemporaries and later historians of science have written that he would have gone on to other major achievements and a Nobel Prize if he had lived. In contrast, after about 1916, Barkla moved well outside the scientific mainstream, clinging to upgrades of his older methods, denying the significance of the Bohr atom and quantization, and continuing to report evidence for what he called the J phenomenon. This chapter addresses the lives and scientific endeavors of Moseley and Barkla, something about the context in which they worked and their connections with other scientists, contemporary, earlier, and later. © 2017 American Chemical Society Introduction Henry Moseley’s (Figure 1) academic credentials consisted of a 1910 Oxford BA with first-class honors in Mathematical Moderations and a second in Natural Sciences (physics) and the MA that followed more or less automatically a few years later.
    [Show full text]