DOCSLIB.ORG

School Indoor Air Quality Best Management Practices Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

School Indoor Air Quality Best Management Practices Manual November 2003 Office of Environmental Health and Safety Indoor Air Quality Program DOH 333-044 November 2003 School Indoor Air Quality Best Management Practices Manual November 2003 To obtain copies of this document or for more information, please contact the Indoor Air Quality Program at www.doh.wa.gov/ehp/ts/iaq/contact.htm. Mary Selecky Secretary of Health Acknowledgements The 1995 Edition of this manual was prepared by: Richard Hall Tim Hardin Richard Ellis Special acknowledgments for the 1995 Edition to: The Washington State Department of Health School Indoor Air Quality Advisory Committee. The following individuals served on the technical subcommittee: Donald Beach, Halvorson, Beach & Bower, Inc. Jefferey Burgess, Washington Poison Center Janice Camp, Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington John Peard, Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Rich Prill, Washington State Energy Office Mia Sazon, OMS Laboratories, Inc. Greg Stack, Northwest Architectural Company The following individuals served on the policy subcommittee: Ann Bisgard, Washington State PTA Robert Fisher, Washington Education Association Michael F. LaScuola, Spokane County Health District Vaughn Lein, Lein, Stanek & Willson John McGee, Washington State School Directors’ Association Roy Pedersen, Washington Association of School Administrators Mary Schwerdtfeger, State Board of Education Christopher Spitters, Snohomish Health District Office of the Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction: Terry Michalson, Facilities and Organization Supervisor Alberta Mehring, Facilities and Organization Director Washington State Department of Health. This Manual was prepared under the direction of: Gary Plews, Supervisor, Consolidated Environmental Health Programs Karen VanDusen, Office Director, Community Environmental Health Programs Eric Slagle, Assistant Secretary, Environmental Health Programs Other Reviewers/Contributors: Nancy Bernard, Kathleen Dudley, Gary Jefferis, Jim Kerns, Scott LeBar, Colin MacRae, Maria Mason, Karen McDonell, Jim W. White, Jim VanDerslice, and Bob Thompson The 2003 Edition was updated and edited by Tim Hardin and Steve Tilley. i Preface The School Indoor Air Quality Best Management Practices Manual was prepared by the Washington State Department of Health in response to requirements of the Washington State Legislature. Financial assistance was provided by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. The Manual was prepared between July 1994 and January 1995, and updated in 2003. During the initial preparation, the Department of Health formed and consulted with a School Indoor Air Quality Advisory Committee, which provided valuable technical guidance and policy support. The Department of Health encourages all users of the Manual to examine the concepts, recommendations, and procedures outlined in the Manual; evaluate their usefulness and effectiveness; identify any costs and obstacles to implementation; and document any benefits received. Users of the Manual are invited to report their findings to the Department of Health, Office of Environmental Health and Safety (refer to the address and phone number on the title page). Such information may be used to update and improve the Manual, and may assist in identifying training and technical assistance needs related to school indoor air quality. This Manual includes some practices that are required by law, as well as practices that are not legally required but are recommended to promote good quality air in schools. School districts and others using this Manual should evaluate the discretionary recommendations and adopt or promote those that are relevant applicable and feasible to implement. In the event that any recommendations offered in this Manual conflict with codes or laws, the codes or laws take precedence. ii Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ I PREFACE ................................................................................................................................ II ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... VII 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 1 B. WHO WILL USE THE MANUAL? ........................................................................................ 1 C. ORGANIZATION OF THE MANUAL ...................................................................................... 2 TABLE 1-1. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICES TO ATTAIN AND MAINTAIN GOOD SCHOOL INDOOR AIR QUALITY.............................................................................................. 3 2. WHY MANAGE SCHOOL INDOOR AIR QUALITY?................................................ 5 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 B. HEALTH SYMPTOMS AND PROBLEMS ................................................................................ 5 C. INCREASED SPREAD OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES.................................................................. 6 D. SENSITIVITY OF CHILDREN TO INDOOR CONTAMINANTS................................................... 6 E. MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY SYNDROME ................................................................ 6 F. REDUCED PRODUCTIVITY IN STUDENTS, TEACHERS, AND STAFF ...................................... 7 G. STRAINED RELATIONSHIPS................................................................................................ 7 H. POTENTIAL FOR ROOM OR BUILDING CLOSURES AND OCCUPANT RELOCATION............... 7 I. DETERIORATION OF BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT............................................................... 7 J. INCREASED LIABILITY AND RISK........................................................................................ 7 K. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SCHOOLS............................................................................ 8 L. INDOOR AIR QUALITY IN WASHINGTON STATE SCHOOLS ................................................. 8 M. PREVENTING AND MANAGING SCHOOL IAQ PROBLEMS.................................................. 8 3. FACTORS INFLUENCING INDOOR AIR QUALITY................................................. 9 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 9 B. OUTSIDE SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION ........................................................................... 9 C. BUILDING COMPONENTS AND FURNISHINGS ..................................................................... 9 D. BUILDING EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................... 10 E. HUMAN ACTIVITIES......................................................................................................... 10 F. OTHER SOURCES.............................................................................................................. 10 G. POLLUTANT PATHWAYS.................................................................................................. 20 H. TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS AND COMFORT ................................................................... 20 I. THE EFFECTS OF HUMIDITY ON COMFORT LEVELS........................................................... 21 J. VENTILATION TO MEET OCCUPANT NEEDS...................................................................... 21 K. AIR FLOW PATTERNS IN BUILDINGS................................................................................ 22 L. OCCUPANTS PARTICULARLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO INDOOR AIR CONTAMINANTS ................. 22 M. SICK BUILDING SYNDROME............................................................................................ 23 N. BUILDING-RELATED ILLNESS.......................................................................................... 23 4. BASIC STRATEGIES FOR GOOD INDOOR AIR QUALITY.................................. 24 A. RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES FOR GOOD INDOOR AIR QUALITY..................................... 24 B. MANAGE CONTAMINANTS AT THE SOURCE..................................................................... 24 C. USE LOCAL EXHAUST FOR PROBLEM AREAS .................................................................. 24 iii D. USE OUTDOOR AIR TO DILUTE AND REPLACE CONTAMINATED AIR............................... 24 E. CONTROL EXPOSURE - TIME, AMOUNT, AND PRODUCTS ................................................ 25 F. FILTER THE AIR............................................................................................................... 25 G. EDUCATE EVERYONE ON IAQ......................................................................................... 25 H. DESIGNATE AN INDOOR AIR QUALITY COORDINATOR.................................................... 26 5. SITING SCHOOLS FOR GOOD INDOOR AIR QUALITY ...................................... 27 A. RECOMMENDED PRACTICES FOR SCHOOL SITING ........................................................... 27 B. CONDUCT AN ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 27 C. ANALYZE THE LOCAL CLIMATE .....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • GHOST GEAR: the ABANDONED FISHING NETS HAUNTING OUR OCEANS Sea Turtle Entangled in Fishing Gear in the Mediterranean Sea © Marco Care/Greenpeace CONTENTS

    GHOST GEAR: the ABANDONED FISHING NETS HAUNTING OUR OCEANS Sea Turtle Entangled in Fishing Gear in the Mediterranean Sea © Marco Care/Greenpeace CONTENTS

    GHOST GEAR: THE ABANDONED FISHING NETS HAUNTING OUR OCEANS Sea turtle entangled in fishing gear in the Mediterranean Sea © Marco Care/Greenpeace CONTENTS 4 Zusammenfassung 5 Executive summary 6 Introduction 8 Main types of fishing – Nets – Lines – Traps & pots – FADs 11 Ghost gear impacts – Killing ocean creatures – Damaging habitats – Economic and other impacts 13 Current regulations – International agreements and recommendations – Other programmes and resolutions – A cross-sector approach – The need for a Global Ocean Treaty 16 References 2019 / 10 Published by Greenpeace Germany November 2019 Stand Greenpeace e. V., Hongkongstraße 10, 20457 Hamburg, Tel. 040/3 06 18 - 0, [email protected] , www . greenpeace . de Authors Karli Thomas, Dr. Cat Dorey and Farah Obaidullah Responsible for content Helena Spiritus Layout Klasse 3b, Hamburg S 0264 1 Contents 3 DEUTSCHE ZUSAMMENFASSUNG DER STUDIE GHOST GEAR: THE ABANDONED FISHING NETS HAUNTING OUR OCEANS → Rund 640.000 Tonnen altes Fischereigerät inklusive Geisternetzen, Bojen, Leinen, Fallen und Körbe landen jährlich als Fischereimüll in den Ozeanen. → Weltweit trägt altes Fischereigerät zu etwa zehn Prozent zum Plastikeintrag in die Meere bei. → 45 Prozent aller Arten auf der Roten IUCN-Liste hatten bereits Kontakt mit Plastik im Meer. → Sechs Prozent aller eingesetzten Netze, neun Prozent aller Fallen und 29 Prozent aller Langleinen gehen jährlich auf den Ozeanen verloren und enden als Meeresmüll. → Treibnetze, Fallen und Fischsammler (Fish Aggregating Devices, FADs) gehen weltweit am häufigsten als Müll auf den Ozeanen verloren und bergen die meisten Risiken für Meereslebewesen. → Durch FADs sterben 2,8 bis 6,7 Mal mehr Tiere - darunter bedrohte Arten wie Haie – als Beifang als die Zielarten, für die sie eingesetzt werden.
  • Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Operation and Management Workbook

    Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Operation and Management Workbook

    MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT WORKBOOK Revised April 2018 Preface In many ways, constructing, operating and maintaining a municipal solid waste landfill is similar to constructing, operating, and maintaining a highway, dam, canal, bridge, or other engineered structure. The most important similarity is that landfills, like other engineered structures, must be constructed and operated in a manner that will provide safe, long-term, and reliable service to the communities they serve. Proper design, construction, operation, monitoring, closure and post-closure care are critical because after disposal the waste can be a threat to human health and the environment for decades to centuries. This workbook is intended to provide municipal landfill operators and managers in Wyoming with the fundamental knowledge and technical background necessary to ensure that landfills are operated efficiently, effectively, and in a manner that is protective of human health and the environment. This workbook contains information regarding basic construction and operation activities that are encountered on a routine basis at most landfills. The basic procedures and fundamental elements of landfill permitting, construction management, monitoring, closure, post-closure care, and financial assurance are also addressed. The workbook includes informative tips and information that landfill operators and managers can use to conserve landfill space, minimize the potential for pollution, reduce operating costs, and comply with applicable rules and regulations. In addition to this workbook, operators and managers need to become familiar with the Wyoming Solid Waste Rules and Regulations applicable to municipal solid waste. The DEQ also provides numerous guidelines that may help understand regulatory requirements in more detail.
  • Healthy Climate® Indoor Air Quality Systems

    Healthy Climate® Indoor Air Quality Systems

    HEPA Bypass Air Filtration Systems Healthy Climate® Indoor Air Quality Systems HEPA-20 HEPA-40 HEPA-60 The best possible air filtration. High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) Filtration Systems ® 99.97% efficiency rating Pollutants like dust, pollen, bacteria and viruses find their way into your for removal of all small, home’s air every day. These pollutants can cause poor indoor air quality, breathable particles, airborne mold spores, bacteria and which impacts both your home environment and health. At the very least, Place. viruses, down to 0.3 micron poor air quality can make your home uncomfortable. And, if you’re one of Bypass configuration quietly circulates and cleans the air more than 50 million Americans who suffer from allergies, poor air quality throughout the home can make your home very unhealthy. Designed for easy integration BETTER with Lennox® heating and HIGHLY EFFECTIVE AIR FILTRATION FOR A CLEANER, cooling systems for total HEALTHIER HOME ENVIRONMENT. home comfort …A A Healthy Climate® high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) bypass filtration Best possible air-filtration performance system can go a long way toward improving the air you breathe. Using the same filtration technology found in hospital operating rooms and HOME science labs, a HEPA system removes nearly all allergy-inducing contaminants, including even the smallest particles and bacteria. It filters and freshens the air, so you can breathe easier. Highly effective filtration. THREE CLASSES OF AIR CONTAMINANTS Lennox makes your With a particle-efficiency rating of 99.97%, this system captures and Particles—Pollen, dust mites, dirt, pet dander. filters particles and bioaerosols as Particles are any small as 0.3 micron—contaminants substances measuring less than 100 microns that standard filtration systems in diameter.
  • ASHRAE Position Document on Filtration and Air Cleaning

    ASHRAE Position Document on Filtration and Air Cleaning

    ASHRAE Position Document on Filtration and Air Cleaning Approved by ASHRAE Board of Directors January 29, 2015 Reaffirmed by Technology Council January 13, 2018 Expires January 23, 2021 ASHRAE 1791 Tullie Circle, NE • Atlanta, Georgia 30329-2305 404-636-8400 • fax: 404-321-5478 • www.ashrae.org © 2015 ASHRAE (www.ashrae.org). For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAE's prior written permission. COMMITTEE ROSTER The ASHRAE Position Document on Filtration and Air Cleaning was developed by the Society's Filtration and Air Cleaning Position Document Committee formed on January 6, 2012, with Pawel Wargocki as its chair. Pawel Wargocki, Chair Dean A. Saputa Technical University of Denmark UV Resources Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Santa Clarita, CA Thomas H. Kuehn William J. Fisk University of Minnesota Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Minneapolis, MN Berkeley, CA H.E. Barney Burroughs Jeffrey A. Siegel Building Wellness Consultancy, Inc. The University of Toronto Johns Creek, GA Toronto, ON, Canada Christopher O. Muller Mark C. Jackson Purafil Inc. The University of Texas at Austin Doraville, GA Austin, TX Ernest A. Conrad Alan Veeck BOMA International National Air Filtration Association Washington DC Virginia Beach, VA Other contributors: Dean Tompkins Madison, WI for his contribution on photocatalytic oxidizers Paul Francisco, Ex-Officio Cognizant Committee Chair Environmental Health Committee University of Illinois Champaign, IL ASHRAE is a registered trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, owned by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. © 2015 ASHRAE (www.ashrae.org). For personal use only.
  • Improving Air Quality for Operators of Mobile Machines in Underground Mines

    Improving Air Quality for Operators of Mobile Machines in Underground Mines

    atmosphere Article Improving Air Quality for Operators of Mobile Machines in Underground Mines Andrzej Szczurek 1, Monika Maciejewska 1,*, Marcin Przybyła 2 and Wacław Szetelnicki 2 1 Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrze˙zeWyspia´nskiego27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] 2 Centrum Bada´nJako´scisp. zo. o., ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 62, 59-301 Lubin, Poland; [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (W.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-7132-028-68 Received: 12 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 18 December 2020 Abstract: In underground mines, mobile mining equipment is critical for the production system. The microenvironment inside the mobile machine may cause exposure to strongly polluted mine air, which adversely affects the health and working performance of the operator. Harmful pollutants may access the cabin together with the ventilation air delivered from the machine’s surroundings. This work proposes a solution that is able to ensure that the air for the machine operator is of proper quality. The proposal emerged from an analysis of the compliance of cabins of mobile machines working underground in mines with occupational health and safety (H&S) standards. An analytical model of air quality in a well-mixed zone was utilized for this purpose. The cabin atmosphere was investigated with regard to the concentration of gaseous species in the surrounding air, the cabin ventilation rate, and human breathing parameters. The analysis showed that if currently available ventilation approaches are used, compliance with multiple H&S standards cannot be attained inside the cabin if standards are exceeded in the surroundings of the machine.
  • Indoor Air Quality

    Indoor Air Quality

    Indoor Air Quality Poor indoor air quality can cause a stuffy nose, sore throat, coughing or wheezing, headache, burning eyes, or skin rash. People with asthma or other breathing problems or who have allergies may have severe reactions. Common Indoor Air Pollutants Poor indoor air quality comes from many sources, including: » Tobacco smoke » Mold » Pollen » Allergens such as those from cats, dogs, mice, dust mites, and cockroaches » Smoke from fireplaces and woodstoves » Formaldehyde in building materials, textiles, and furniture » Carbon monoxide from gas furnaces, ovens, and other appliances » Use of household products such as cleaners and bug sprays » Outdoor air pollution from factories, vehicles, wildfires, and other sources How to Improve Indoor Air Quality » Open windows to let in fresh air. • However, if you have asthma triggered by outdoor air pollution or pollen, opening windows might not be a good idea. In this case, use exhaust fans and non-ozone-producing air cleaners to reduce exposure to these triggers. » Clean often to get rid of dust, pet fur, and other allergens. • Use a vacuum cleaner equipped with a HEPA filter. • Wet or damp mopping is better than sweeping. » Take steps to control mold and pests. » Do not smoke, and especially do not smoke indoors. If you think poor indoor air is making you sick, please see or call a doctor or other health care provider. About CDC CDC is a federal public health agency based in Atlanta, GA. Our mission is to promote health and quality of life by preventing and controlling disease, injury and disability. For More Information We want to help you to stay healthy.
  • Traditional Artifacts from Bena Grass [Chrysopogon Zizanioides (L.) Roberty] (Poaceae) in Jajpur District of Odisha, India

    Traditional Artifacts from Bena Grass [Chrysopogon Zizanioides (L.) Roberty] (Poaceae) in Jajpur District of Odisha, India

    Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge Vol. 13 (4), October 2014, pp. 771-777 Traditional artifacts from Bena grass [Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty] (Poaceae) in Jajpur district of Odisha, India BK Tripathy1, T Panda2 & RB Mohanty3* 1Department of Botany, Dharmasala Mohavidyalaya, Dharmasala, Jajpur-755001, Odisha; 2Department of Botany, Chandabali College, Chandabali, Bhadrak-756133, Odisha; 3Department of Botany, NC (Autonomous) College, Jajpur – 755001, Odisha E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] Received 27.06.13, revised 19.08.13 The paper reports the utility of a common wetland plant Bena in traditional craft making in some rural pockets of Jajpur district of Odisha. The field survey was conducted during the year 2010-2012 to access the present status of this unique plant based craft as well as the condition of the artisans involved in this craft making. Data were collected through interview with elderly artisans of the area of study. The result revealed that making artifacts from Bena is exclusively the hand work of female folk belonging to SC (Scheduled caste) and ST (Scheduled tribe) communities. Most of these artisans are either daily wage labourers or marginal farmers while making such craft is their secondary occupation. They collect the raw material, i.e. Bena stem from the nearby field, process it and make around two hundred varieties of attractive craft items both for traditional use in socio-religious rituals and as modern life style accessories. These artifacts are appreciated for their intricate design and glazing golden yellow colour. The existing conditions of this folk craft as well as the artisans were analysed.
  • Urbanization As a Threat to Biodiversity: Trophic Theory, Economic Geography, and Implications for Conservation Land Acquisition

    Urbanization As a Threat to Biodiversity: Trophic Theory, Economic Geography, and Implications for Conservation Land Acquisition

    Proceedings of a Symposium at the Society for Conservation Biology 2004 Annual Meeting URBANIZATION AS A THREAT TO BIODIVERSITY: TROPHIC THEORY, ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION LAND ACQUISITION Brian Czech1 ABSTRACT—Habitat loss is often cited as the primary cause of species endangerment in the United States, followed by invasive species, pollution, and direct take. Urbanization, one type of habitat loss, is the leading cause of species endangerment in the contiguous United States and entails a relatively thorough transformation from the “economy of nature” to the human economy. Principles of economic geography indicate that urbanization will continue as a function of economic growth, while principles of conservation biology indicate that the most thorough competitive exclusion occurs in urban areas. These findings suggest the need for an ecologically macroeconomic approach to conservation land acquisition strategies. “Habitat loss” is often cited as the primary cause of species these types of habitat loss are considered separate causes of endangerment in the United States, followed by invasive species endangerment, invasive species are identified as the species, pollution, disease, and direct take. However, vari- leading cause of species endangerment in the United States, ous types of habitat loss are readily identified, such as log- including Hawaii and Puerto Rico (Czech et al. 2000). On ging, mining, agriculture, and urbanization (table 1). When the mainland United States, however, urbanization is the Table 1.— Causes of endangerment for the first 877 (of the current 1,262) species in the United States and Puerto Rico classified as threatened or endangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (from Czech et al.
  • Diagnosing IAQ Problems

    Diagnosing IAQ Problems

    Diagnosing IAQ Problems he goal of the diagnostic building T Start (reason for concern) investigation is to identify and solve the indoor air quality complaint in a way that t 6 prevents it from recurring and that does not Initial walkthrough n preparation create other problems. This section n visual inspection describes a method for discovering the n talk with occupants and staff cause of the complaint and presents a t “toolbox” of diagnostic activities to assist Do you have Yes you in collecting information. an explanation Just as a carpenter uses only the tools for the complaint ? that are needed for any given job, an IAQ No investigator should use only the investiga- t Collect additional tive techniques that are needed. Many information about indoor air quality complaints can be n building occupants resolved without using all of the diagnostic n the HVAC system n pollutant pathways tools described in this chapter. For n pollutant sources example, it may be easy to identify the (sample contaminants if needed) source of cooking odors that are annoying t nearby office workers and solve the Develop one or more hypotheses problem by controlling pressure relation- to explain the problem. Test by ships (e.g., installing exhaust fans) in the manipulating building conditions or exposure, or by performing food preparation area. Similarly, most appropriate tests. mechanical or carpentry problems prob- ably require only a few of the many tools t t you have available and are easily accom- Do results Attempt plished with in-house expertise. No Yes Follow-up support your a control validation The use of in-house personnel builds hypothesis ? strategy skills that will be helpful in minimizing and resolving future problems.
  • Toxic Tide: the Threat of Marine Plastic Pollution in Australia

    Toxic Tide: the Threat of Marine Plastic Pollution in Australia

    The Senate Environment and Communications References Committee Toxic tide: the threat of marine plastic pollution in Australia April 2016 © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 ISBN 978-1-76010-400-9 Committee contact details PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 3526 Fax: 02 6277 5818 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/senate_ec This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra Committee membership Committee members Senator Anne Urquhart, Chair ALP, TAS Senator Linda Reynolds CSC, Deputy Chair (from 12 October 2015) LP, WA Senator Anne McEwen (from 18 April 2016) ALP, WA Senator Chris Back (from 12 October 2015) LP, WA Senator the Hon Lisa Singh ALP, TAS Senator Larissa Waters AG, QLD Substitute member for this inquiry Senator Peter Whish-Wilson (AG, TAS) for Senator Larissa Waters (AG, QLD) Former members Senator the Hon Anne Ruston, Deputy Chair (to 12 October 2015) LP, SA Senator the Hon James McGrath (to 12 October 2015) LP, QLD Senator Joe Bullock (to 13 April 2016) ALP, WA Committee secretariat Ms Christine McDonald, Committee Secretary Mr Colby Hannan, Principal Research Officer Ms Fattimah Imtoual, Senior Research Officer Ms Kirsty Cattanach, Research Officer iii iv Table of Contents List of recommendations ..................................................................................vii List of abbreviations ....................................................................................... xiii Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 Conduct of the inquiry ............................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgement .................................................................................................
  • Rates of Particulate Pollution Deposition Onto Leaf Surfaces: Temporal and Inter-Species Magnetic Analyses

    Rates of Particulate Pollution Deposition Onto Leaf Surfaces: Temporal and Inter-Species Magnetic Analyses

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Environmental Pollution xxx (2010) 1–7 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Pollution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol Rates of particulate pollution deposition onto leaf surfaces: Temporal and inter-species magnetic analyses R. Mitchell a,*, B.A. Maher a, R. Kinnersley b a Centre for Environmental Magnetism and Palaeomagnetism, Lancaster Environment Centre, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK b Evidence Directorate, Environment Agency, Olton Court, 10 Warwick Road, Olton, Solihull B92 7HX, UK This research uses biomagnetic techniques to enable quantitative mapping of particulate pollution distribution at uniquely high spatial resolution. article info abstract Article history: Evaluation of health impacts arising from inhalation of pollutant particles <10 mm (PM10) is an active Received 1 September 2009 research area. However, lack of exposure data at high spatial resolution impedes identification of Received in revised form causal associations between exposure and illness. Biomagnetic monitoring of PM10 deposited on tree 11 December 2009 leaves may provide a means of obtaining exposure data at high spatial resolution. To calculate ambient Accepted 16 December 2009 PM10 concentrations from leaf magnetic values, the relationship between the magnetic signal and total PM10 mass must be quantified, and the exposure time (via magnetic deposition velocity (MVd) Keywords: calculations) known. Birches display higher MV (w5cmÀ1) than lime trees (w2cmÀ1). Leaf saturation Magnetic biomonitoring d w Deposition velocity remanence values reached ‘equilibrium’ with ambient PM10 concentrations after 6 ‘dry’ days (<3 mm/day rainfall). Other co-located species displayed within-species consistency in MV ; robust PM10 monitoring d Tree leaves inter-calibration can thus be achieved, enabling magnetic PM10 biomonitoring at unprecedented spatial Inter-species calibration resolution.
  • WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality : Selected Pollutants

    WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality : Selected Pollutants

    WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY: WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY: This book presents WHO guidelines for the protection of pub- lic health from risks due to a number of chemicals commonly present in indoor air. The substances considered in this review, i.e. benzene, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, naphthalene, nitrogen dioxide, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (especially benzo[a]pyrene), radon, trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethyl- ene, have indoor sources, are known in respect of their hazard- ousness to health and are often found indoors in concentrations of health concern. The guidelines are targeted at public health professionals involved in preventing health risks of environmen- SELECTED CHEMICALS SELECTED tal exposures, as well as specialists and authorities involved in the design and use of buildings, indoor materials and products. POLLUTANTS They provide a scientific basis for legally enforceable standards. World Health Organization Regional Offi ce for Europe Scherfi gsvej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Tel.: +45 39 17 17 17. Fax: +45 39 17 18 18 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.euro.who.int WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants The WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn Office, WHO Regional Office for Europe coordinated the development of these WHO guidelines. Keywords AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR - prevention and control AIR POLLUTANTS - adverse effects ORGANIC CHEMICALS ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE - adverse effects GUIDELINES ISBN 978 92 890 0213 4 Address requests for publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for per- mission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).