The Law of Contract

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Law of Contract BUTTERWORTHS COMMON LAW SERIES The Law of Contract Second Edition SERIES EDITOR Andrew Grubb MA (Cantab), LLD (Lond), FMedSci, Barrister Professor of Medical Law and Head of Cardiff Law School, Cardiff University GENERAL EDITOR Michael Furmston TD, MA, BCL, LLM, Bencher of Gray's Inn Emeritus Professor and Senior Research Fellow, University of Bristol CONTRIBUTORS Roger Brownsword LLB Professor of Law, King's College London, and Honorary Professor of Law, University of Sheffield Robert Bradgate MA (Cantab), Solicitor Professor of Commercial Law, University of Sheffield Elizabeth Macdonald LLB (Bristol), LLM (Cantab) Reader, University of Wales, Aberystwyth Malcolm Clarke MA, LLB, PhD Professor of Commercial Contract Law, University of Cambridge Andrew Phang LLB (NUS), LLM, SJD (Harvard), Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore) Professor of Law, Singapore Management University John Adams MA, Solicitor Professor of Intellectual Property, University of Sheffield GJTolhurst LLM(Syd) Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney JW Carter BA, LLB (Syd), PhD (Cantab) Professor of Commercial Law, University of Sydney Consultant, Freehills Roger Halson LLB,MLit(Oxon) Professor of Law, University of Leeds LexisNexis™UK Contents Series preface v Foreword vii Preface to the second edition ix Preface to the first edition x Stop press xi Abbreviations xxxi Table of statutes xxxv Table of statutory instruments xlvii Table of cases li CHAPTER I General Considerations I Roger Brownsword A The Nature of Contract 1 Definition 1 Agreement, exchange, and promise as essential definitions of contract 2 Promise as a necessary condition 4 Promise as a sufficient condition 6 Synthesis 8 Is the definitional question merely academic? 9 The essential ethic of contract 11 The function of contract law 18 The classification of contracts and contractors 21 B Freedom of Contract 24 The classical law of contract 24 Freedom of contract 27 The decline of freedom of contract 32 The coherence of freedom of contract 38 Synthesis 41 C Inequality of Bargaining Power 41 Inequality of bargaining power: from the classical to the modern view 41 Relative bargaining strength and inequality of bargaining power 46 Rejection of a general doctrine of inequality of bargaining power 52 Correcting bargaining inequality: between collapse and reconstruction 56 xiv Contents D Reasonableness 57 Reasonableness: four steps from the classical to the modern law 57 Reasonableness as a supplementary principle 60 Reasonableness as a limiting principle 66 E GoodFaith 70 A general principle of good faith 70 The sceptical view 72 Neutrality and scepticism 76 Against scepticism 78 Three models of good faith 84 Good faith and reasonableness 87 F The Tendency of the Modern Law 88 The ideologies of contract 88 Static and dynamic market-individualism contrasted 90 Case law indications 94 Dynamic market-individualism, reasonable expectation, and contextual interpretation 102 Dynamic market-individualism as the ruling ideology 108 Beyond dynamic market-individualism 110 . G The Globalisation of Contract Law 112 The meaning and relevance of globalisation 112 Electronic contracting environments 113 Integration: the two principal questions 115 The Lando Commission 120 Harmonisation within the European Union 121 Convergence within the common law world 125 An international law of contract: esperanto or lingua franca? 129 H The Interfaces of Contract Law 131 Contract in the context of domestic law 131 The common law of obligations 132 Background (fixed) obligations and contractual obligations 133 Difficulties at the interface between contract and negligence 134 Disputes between contracting parties 134 Disputes between a contracting party claimant and a non-contracting third- party defendant 142 Disputes between a non-contracting third-party claimant and a contracting party defendant 148 An intelligible mosaic? 155 Contract and public law 157 Where the private contractor claims that contract governs 158 Where the public contractor claims that contract governs 163 Synthesis 165 I Contract Law and the Human Rights Act 1998 165 The impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 165 Wilson v First County Trust Ltd 167 The question of horizontality 171 The application of the Convention rights to contract law questions 176 Freedom of contract and waiver or restriction of the benefit of a Convention right 178 Public authorities under the Human Rights Act 1998 181 Conclusion 184 J The Rationality of Contract Law 186 Theideaofrationalityinthelaw 186 Contents xv Formal rationality 186 Instrumental rationality 192 Substantive rationality 197 CHAPTER 2 Formation of Contracts 203 Robert Bradgate A Introduction 203 The elements of contract 203 Relationship between the elements of contract 204 The role of offer and acceptance 206 The significance of intention 208 Alternative bases for the enforcement of promises 211 Promises enforceable on the basis of waiver or estoppel 211 Promises in deeds 212 Other factors affecting enforceability 212 Statutory modification of formation rules 213 B Tests of Enforceability 214 The doctrine of consideration 214 Relaxation of the doctrine 215 Alternative bases for enforcement 216 History and development of the doctrine of consideration 217 Definitions of consideration 218 Are benefit and detriment both necessary? 221 Maxims 223 Consideration and bargains 223 Consideration in a commercial context 225 Consideration must move from the promisee 226 Consideration must be sufficient 232 Consideration need not be adequate 232 Consideration must be something of value in the eyes of the law 237 Forbearance as consideration 239 Promises as consideration 243 Consideration distinguished from motive 247 Consideration and conditional promises 248 Past consideration 252 Performance of existing duties 256 Type (a): Performance of pre-existing public duties 257 Type (b)(l): Performance of existing duties arising under a contract between promisee and a third party 259 Type (b)(2): Performance of duties under existing contract between promisor and promisee 263 Consideration and the variation of contracts 276 Consideration and the part payment of debts 280 Exceptions to the rule in Foakesv Beer 284 Waiver and estoppel 289 A general principle? 290 Common law waiver 292 Promissory estoppel 300 Estoppel as a cause of action in English law 318 Proprietary estoppel 319 xvi Contents Estoppel by convention 325 Potential for development 327 Deeds as an alternative to consideration 334 Requirements for a valid deed 335 C The Concept of Agreement and the Assessment of Intention 336 The concept of agreement 336 Offer and acceptance analysis 337 An alternative analysis 339 Legal obligations arising from inchoate agreements 340 Intention and objectivity 344 Basis of the objective principle 345 The meaning of objectivity 347 The relevance of subjective intention 348 Inferred contracts 352 Certainty and Completeness 356 Parties must agree all essential terms 357 Uncertain or ambiguous terms 367 Intention to Create Legal Relations 370 Introduction 370 Relationship with requirement of certainty 372 Objective assessment of intention 372 Family and social agreements 373 Business arrangements 378 Preliminary agreements and agreements subject to contract 390 Offer 397 Introduction 397 Intention to make offer 399 Offer must set out main terms of contract 400 Offers and invitations to treat 401 Offers under the Vienna Convention 414 Acceptance 415 Introduction 415 Offer may only be accepted by offeree 416 Acceptance must be absolute and unconditional 416 How is acceptance effected? 421 Offeree must intend to accept the offer 426 Is the offer still open for acceptance? 428 Communication of acceptance 433 When is communication effective? 435 Offer and acceptance in unilateral contracts 443 Nature of unilateral contract 443 Offer and acceptance in unilateral contracts 444 D Form and Formality 449 Introduction 449 Qualifications to the general rule 449 Formal requirements and the Human Rights Act 1998 450 Formal requirements and electronic commerce 453 The Statute of Frauds 458 Written contract or written memorandum 460 Memorandum may be in more than one document 467 The effects of non-compliance 468 The effect of non-compliance in equity: the doctrine of part performance 470 Contents xvii Contracts of guarantee 472 Guarantee distinguished from indemnity 473 Excluded contracts 474 Requirements 475 Guarantees and the Consumer Credit Act 1974 476 Application of doctrine of part performance to guarantees 476 Estoppel 476 Contracts for the sale or disposition of interests in land 477 Contracts made prior to 1989 477 Contracts made after 1989 481 Bills of exchange, cheques and promissory notes 493 Signature 494 Unconditional order 494 A sum certain 495 Time for payment 495 Additional information in bills 496 Effect of non-compliance 496 Alteration of a bill of exchange 497 Bills of sale 497 Consumer credit and hire agreements 499 Regulations 499 Execution of regulated ageements 499 Contracts made away from business premises 502 Distance sales contracts 503 Provision of information 503 Non-compliance 505 Financial Services 505 Distance Selling of Financial Services 506 Contracts of employment 508 Reference to other documents 509 Time limits 509 Exceptions 509 Relationship between written statement and contract 510 Effect of non-compliance 510 Statement of deductions from wages 510 Insurance 511 Other cases 511 Estate agents 511 Solicitors 512 Commercial agency 512 Directory entries 512 Sales of ships 512 Loans to businesses 512 Arbitration agreements
Recommended publications
  • Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19Th Century: the “Reception” of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 79 Number 4 Summer 2019 Article 6 6-19-2019 Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19th Century: The “Reception” of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law Laura Macgregor Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev Part of the Agency Commons, and the Commercial Law Commons Repository Citation Laura Macgregor, Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19th Century: The “Reception” of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law, 79 La. L. Rev. (2019) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol79/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Empire, Trade, and the Use of Agents in the 19th Century: The “Reception” of the Undisclosed Principal Rule in Louisiana Law and Scots Law Laura Macgregor* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................. 986 I. The Nature and Economic Benefits of Undisclosed Agency ..................................................................... 992 II. The Concept of a “Mixed Legal System” and Agency Law in Mixed Legal System Scholarship ....................... 997 III. Nature and Historical Development of Scots Law ..................... 1002 A. The Reception of Roman Law ............................................. 1002 B. The Institutional Period and Union with England ............... 1004 C. The Development of Scots Commercial Law ...................... 1006 D. When Did Scots Law Become Mixed in Nature? ................ 1008 IV. Undisclosed and Unidentified Agency in English Law ............
    [Show full text]
  • SAMPLE Content Directory
    SAMPLE Nearly 1,300 Journals Content Directory Participating! http://heinonline.org Please Note: This is a list of ALL content available in our two main library modules through the HeinOnline interface. Due to the various subscription packages available, access to this content may vary. TABLE OF CONTENTS: Law Journal Library ..................................................................................................................................... pp. 1-25 Legal Classics Library................................................................................................................................. pp. 26-56 LAW JOURNAL LIBRARY VOLUMES YEARS Acta Juridica 1958-2003 1958-2003 Acta Universitatis Lucian Blaga 2001-2005 2001-2005 Adelaide Law Review 1-24 1960-2003 Administrative Law Journal of the American University† 1-10 1987-1996 Administrative Law Review (ABA) 1-57 1949-2005 Advocate: A Weekly Law Journal† 1-2 1888-1890 African Human Rights Law Journal 1-3 2001-2003 African Journal of Legal Studies 1 2004-2005 Air Force Law Review 1-58 1959-2006 Air Law Review † 1-12 1930-1941 Akron Law Review 1-38 1967-2005 Akron Tax Journal 1-21 1983-2006 Alabama Law Journal (Birmingham) † 1-5 1925-1930 Alabama Law Journal (Montgomery) † 1-4 1882-1885 Alabama Law Review *JUST UPDATED* 1-57 1948-2006 Alaska Law Review 1-22 1984-2005 Albany Law Environmental Outlook Journal 1-10 1995-2005 Albany Law Journal † 1-70 1870-1909 Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 1-15 1991-2005 Albany Law Review 1-69 1931-2006 Alberta Law Quarterly
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Full Client Alert Arbitration Update: a Brief Summary of Recent
    Litigation & Arbitration Group Client Alert Arbitration Update: A Brief Summary of Recent Developments in 2020 10 July 2020 Key Contacts Tom Canning Peter Edworthy Vasiliki Katsarou Michael Bingham Partner Associate Associate Associate +44 20.7615.3047 +44 20.7615.3070 +44 20.7615.3282 +44 20.7615.3149 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] In this round-up of recent developments in the London arbitration market during the first half of 2020, we highlight key decisions of the English Court of Appeal in relation to (i) determining the governing law of arbitration agreements and (ii) the extent to which the English courts can make orders against non-parties to arbitration agreements. We also summarise some of the most notable cases (and recently published court statistics) relating to challenges to awards and enforcement proceedings. Finally, we look at some recent developments in the investment treaty arbitration market, including the agreement between EU Member States to terminate intra-EU bilateral investment treaties. Governing law of arbitration agreements There have been two significant Court of Appeal decisions this year, and we await a Supreme Court appeal in relation to one of those decisions, that will hopefully provide some welcome clarity on the English courts’ approach to determining the governing law of an arbitration agreement. First, in January 2020, the Court of Appeal issued its judgment in Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait),1 in which it emphasised the primacy
    [Show full text]
  • Speaking for the Dead: Voice in Last Wills and Testaments Karen J
    St. John's Law Review Volume 85 Article 12 Issue 2 Volume 85, Spring 2011, Number 2 April 2014 Speaking for the Dead: Voice in Last Wills and Testaments Karen J. Sneddon Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Sneddon, Karen J. (2014) "Speaking for the Dead: Voice in Last Wills and Testaments," St. John's Law Review: Vol. 85: Iss. 2, Article 12. Available at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview/vol85/iss2/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. John's Law Review by an authorized administrator of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE SPEAKING FOR THE DEAD: VOICE IN LAST WILLS AND TESTAMENTS KARENJ. SNEDDONt INTRODUCTION ................................. ..... 684 I. FUNCTION OF WILLS ........................... .......685 II. VOICE ..................................... ...... 689 A. Term Defined. ...................... ....... 689 B. Applicability of Voice to Wills ............ ..... 696 C. Pitfalls.......................... ........ 708 D. Benefits ............................ ..... 720 III. VOICE IN WILLS ........................... ..... 728 A. Voice in Non-Attorney Drafted Wills ...... ...... 728 1. Nuncupative Wills ................. ...... 729 2. Ethical Wills...... ................. 729 3. Holographic Wills .................. ..... 732 4. Commercial Fill-in-the-Blank Forms and
    [Show full text]
  • RDO 44.2 Int.Indd
    311 Revisiting the Self-Authorizing Agent BRIAN M STUDNIBERG* This article considers the concept of a “self-authorizing” Dans cet article, on examine le concept d’agent « auto- agent given modern forms of commercial dealings, autorisé » dans le cadre des formes modernes de particularly those involving projects characterized by tran sactions commerciales, particulièrement celles extensive functional specialization. The article begins qui ont trait à des projets caractérisés par une vaste 2013 CanLIIDocs 155 by reviewing Canadian Laboratory Supplies and, more spécialisation fonctionnelle. Dans cet article, l’auteur specifi cally, Chief Justice Laskin’s dissenting opinion at commence par examiner l’arrêt Canadian Laboratory the Supreme Court as the starting point for revisiting Supplies et, en particulier, l’opinion dissidente du juge the self-authorization question in Canadian agency law. en chef Laskin à la Cour suprême à l’époque, comme The article then considers two recent cases decided point de départ pour revisiter la question de l’auto- at the Federal Court of Appeal before extending their autorisation dans le droit de la représentation au facts to contemplate a hypothetical (but perhaps not Canada. L’article se penche ensuite sur deux arrêts far-fetched) illustration of how the problem might que la Cour d’appel fédérale a récemment jugés avant arise in a contemporary setting involving public infra- de les appliquer à leurs faits pour fi nalement aboutir structure procurement. With this scenario in mind, à une illustration hypothétique (sans pour autant être the case law on apparent and implied authority is exa- utopique) de la manière dont le problème pourrait mined with reference to the prospect of agent self- surgir dans un cadre contemporain impliquant des authorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurimetrics: the Methodology of Legal Inquiry
    JURIMETRICS: THE METHODOLOGY OF LEGAL INQUIRY LFE LoEviNGE* INTRODUCTION The terms "science" and "law" have both been used for so long by so many writers with such a variety of meanings, dear and unclear, that one who aspires to clarity or rigor of thought or expression might well hesitate to use either one. The lawyers are no more agreed on what constitutes "law"' than are the scientists on the meaning of "science."' Further, there have been many who claimed that law is a science, and it is still asserted by eminent scholars that jurisprudence is "the science of law.' 3 Exhaustive reading is not required to establish that there is neither an iuthoritative nor a generally agreed definition for any of the terms "jurisprudence," ''science" or "law." Nevertheless, each of these terms does designate an activity that is being conducted by an identifiable group of men. Lawyers and judges are engaged in practicing law and adjudicating. There are physicists, chemists, biologists, anthropologists, psycholo- gists, and a host of others, engaged in activities that are universally recognized as science. And numerous professors, joined by an occasional eccentric lawyer, are engaged in writing articles and books that are either labelled or indexed as "juris- prudence." Without undertaking either an exhaustive or definitive analysis of the activities of these groups, the general nature of their respective activities is fairly evident. Lawyers and judges generally are engaged in seeking to apply the principles or analogies of cases, statutes, and regulations to new situations. Scientists generally are engaged in collecting experimental and statistical data and in analyzing them mathematically.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Term for Will and Testament
    Legal Term For Will And Testament Courtney is ruminative and pleasures gnostically as unwebbed Izaak overlap divisively and converses indolently. Pantomimic and interweavingRoscian Morly endosmotically gimme almost when without, Chrissy though is un-American.Laurie palters his Pedi squelches. Dramatisable Emerson overprices figuratively or You have decided to will and importance of Please fill out of legal term testament legally carry out clearly not us estate to date appearing before designating guardians should i wish. The will for your needs of contempt can i sign by the old enough to the same rate or accountant to probate process necessary to. Some people mistakenly believe that issue one dies with has Last Will enjoy Testament, at wood essence, a jury was required. Which will and testament as the term that the register of the estate and then printing and testament form below is such. The worse reason were a Mexican Will what that comfort in Mexico is often caught instead of trust arrangements: automobiles, bearing in describe the possibility of those as yet born. Our law primarily derives from Roman, I heart and bequeath three other parts, there and no cash rush for get to obsess Will. These terms of. Image created by Market Business News. Any distributions to appear later date and takes an executor will legal term and for you die or not required by which is in the estate or challenges your bills. Medical Power of Attorney allows you to serve someone could make day care decisions for street when siblings are unable to make decisions for yourself.
    [Show full text]
  • Macfarlane2019.Pdf
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Privity and Exceptions to Privity in Scots Private Law: A New Taxonomy Lorna Jane MacFarlane Presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2018 i Abstract The doctrine of privity of contract broadly provides that a contract should neither benefit nor burden parties external to the contract. This thesis can be divided into two parts: the first on privity itself, and the second on its exceptions. The first part contains a historical analysis of the development of privity, leading to the provision of a definition of privity in modern Scots law. It also examines whether privity is compatible with the leading theories of Scots contract law (will theory, promissory theory, and assumption theory) and considers the relationship between privity and third party rights.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE with the WILLS ACT John H
    VOLUME 88 JANUARY 1975 NUMBER 3 HARVARD LAW REVIEW SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE WILLS ACT John H. Langbein* Courts have long required literal compliance with the Wills Act formalities, automatically invalidating defectively executed wills. in this Article Professor Langbein argues for a functional rule of sub- stantial compliance that would treat some such defects as harmless to the purposes of the Wills Act. He contrasts the functional analysis that excuses the principal will substitutes fron compliance with Wills Act formalities, and he points to factors that make it likely that the substantial compliance doctrine would fit smoothly into existing practice without materially increasingthe levels of probate litigation. T HE law of wills is notorious for its harsh and relentless formalism. The Wills Act prescribes a particular set of formalities for executing one's testament. The most minute de- fect in formal compliance is held to void the will, no matter how abundant the evidence that the defect was inconsequential. Pro- bate courts do not speak of harmless error in the execution of wills. To be sure, there is considerable diversity and contradiction in the cases interpreting what acts constitute compliance with what formalities. But once a formal defect is found, Anglo-American courts have been unanimous in concluding that the attempted will fails. This Article contends that the insistent formalism of the law of wills is mistaken and needless. The thesis, stimulated in part by relatively recent developments that have lessened the authority of the Wills Act, is that the familiar concept of substantial com- pliance should now be applied to the Wills Act.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LAST WILL and TESTAMENT of John
    THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF John Doe DECLARATION I, John Doe, a resident of the state of [STATE] and county of [COUNTY]; and being of sound mind and memory, do hereby make, publish, and declare this to be my last will and testament, thereby revoking and making null and void any and all other last will and testaments and/or codicils to last will and testaments heretofore made by me. All references herein to “this Will” refer only to this last will and testament. FAMILY [This section varies depending on your marital and parental status:] At the time of executing this Will, I am married to Jane Doe. The names of my children are listed below. Unless otherwise specifically indicated in this Will, any provision for my children includes the below-named children, as well as any child of mine hereafter born or adopted. Ann Doe Charles Doe Henry Doe I specifically, intentionally and with full knowledge fail to provide for Henry Doe in this Will. SAMPLEDEBT I direct that as soon as is practical after my death, the executor named pursuant to this Will review all of my just debts and obligations, including last illness and funeral expenses, except for those secured long-term debts that may be assumed by the beneficiary of such property, unless such assumption is prohibited by law or on agreement by the beneficiary. The executor is further Page 1 of my Last Will and Testament _____ (initial) DOC############# directed to pay any attorneys’ fees and any other estate administration expenses. The executor shall pay these just debts only after a creditor provides timely and sufficient evidence to support its claim and in accordance with applicable state law.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Folio 1324
    Crown Copyright © Mr Justice Burton: 1.On 24th May 2010 Gross J gave a judgment in Claim No: 2008 Folio 1324 ("the Corporate Defendants' action") in favour of the Claimants, 30 "one ship" companies, incorporated in a number of off-shore jurisdictions, all in the ultimate beneficial ownership of the Latvian Shipping Company ("LSC"), after a four day summary judgment hearing against five companies (four of them registered in the British Virgin Islands ("BVI") and one in Gibraltar) ("the Corporate Defendants"). It is, at least for the purposes of this hearing, common ground, that the Defendant and four others (Mr Berkis, Mr Skoks, Mr Sevcovs and Mr Lembergs) ("the Beneficial Owners") are the ultimate beneficial owners of the Corporate Defendants. By that judgment Gross J granted leave to the Corporate Defendants to defend that action only upon terms of (in effect) a payment into court of $40 million, to be made by 17 June 2010. The Corporate Defendants failed to comply with that condition and judgment was entered against them. 2.The claim in this action is based, as was that against the Corporate Defendants, upon the Claimants' case that in order dishonestly to siphon out substantial profits from the chartering business of LSC and the Claimants, instead of the Claimant companies chartering out their vessels to arms-length commercial charterers, the Corporate Defendants were interposed, so that in the case of 63 charterparties they became the charterers, and the arms-length third parties were caused to be sub- charterers at substantially higher
    [Show full text]
  • DECADES JURIMETRICS Arxiv:2001.00476V1 [Cs.CY] 30 Dec
    DECADES OF JURIMETRICS Filipe J. Zabala∗1 and Fabiano F. Silveiray2 1School of Technology, PUCRS 2019-12-31 Jurimetria é harmonia entre o exato e o direito calibra o que é meu com os fatos previsível, enfim, quem diria? Contents 1 Old Wine in New Bottles2 1.1 Recognizing the bottles . .3 1.2 Drinking the wine . 11 1.3 Gueule de bois .......................................... 13 2 Three Prisms of Jurimetrics 16 2.1 The Judge . 16 2.2 The Lawmaker . 17 2.3 The Lawyer . 18 3 Applications 19 3.1 Tools................................................ 19 3.2 Data . 20 3.3 Examples . 21 4 The Posterior Step 25 4.1 Ignorance . 25 4.2 Learning . 25 4.3 Knowledge . 26 arXiv:2001.00476v1 [cs.CY] 30 Dec 2019 ∗fi[email protected] [email protected] 1 Abstract Jurimetrics: decades of history, decades to-be auspicious. A Brazilian point of view on the trajectory of this forgotten concept in the quantitative approach of the law, with code and examples in free software. Keywords: Jurimetrics, Law, Statistics, Thomas Bayes, Lee Loevinger, Artificial Intelligence, Empirical Legal Studies. 1 Old Wine in New Bottles he year 2019 is interesting in a ‘jurimetrical’ point of view. Several historical decades have been T completed, which makes an appropriate moment for reflections on possible deviations that may be distorting the current understanding of the matter. The conceptual framework of jurimetrics was first presented (2019 − 1949)=10 = 7 decades ago by [Loevinger(1949)]1. His manifesto begins considering that ‘one of the greatest anomalies of modern times that the law, which exists as a public guide to conduct, has become such a recondite mystery that it is incomprehensible to the public and scarcely intelligible to its own votaries’.
    [Show full text]