DOCSLIB.ORG

Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Designation of Critical Habitat for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Final Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 February 2003 Table of Contents Page Abstract ................................................................... i Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................. iii Summary ............................................................... S-1 Chapter 1. Purpose and Need for Action ..................................... 1-1 Introduction ........................................................ 1-1 Purpose of the Action ................................................ 1-1 Need for the Action .................................................. 1-3 Background ........................................................ 1-4 Rio Grande Silvery Minnow ..................................... 1-4 Decision to List the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow as Endangered .......... 1-6 Original Designation of Critical Habitat ............................. 1-7 Present Proceeding to Prepare an EIS and Redesignate Critical Habitat ........... 1-8 Overview of the Scoping Process .................................. 1-8 Issues Raised During Scoping .................................... 1-9 General Considerations .................................... 1-9 Silvery Minnow ........................................ 1-10 Alternatives ........................................... 1-11 Impacts ............................................... 1-12 Overview of the Comment Period for the DEIS ............................ 1-14 Permits Required for Implementation ................................... 1-15 Related Environmental Planning ....................................... 1-15 Chapter 2. Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action ......................... 2-1 Development of Alternatives ........................................... 2-1 Consideration of Management Plans ..................................... 2-5 Alternative A – No Action Alternative ................................... 2-10 Description of the Alternative ................................... 2-10 Actions Associated with the Alternative ............................ 2-10 Alternative B – The Middle Rio Grande from Cochiti Dam to Elephant Butte Dam, And the Lower Jemez River .............................. 2-10 Description of the Alternative ................................... 2-10 Actions Associated with the Alternative ............................ 2-13 Sub-Alternative B-2 - Exclusion of Four Pueblo Lands in the Middle Rio Grande (Preferred Alternative) ................................... 2-13 Description of the sub-alternative ................................. 2-13 Actions Associated with the sub-alternative ......................... 2-16 Alternative C – Exclusion of the Cochiti Reach ............................ 2-17 Description of the Alternative ................................... 2-17 v Actions Associated with the Alternative ............................ 2-19 Alternative D – Exclusion of the San Acacia Reach ......................... 2-19 Description of the Alternative ................................... 2-19 Actions Associated with the Alternative ............................ 2-21 Alternative E – Designation of Selected Reaches of the Middle Rio Grande, the Lower Rio Grande, and the Pecos River ......................... 2-21 Description of the Alternative ................................... 2-21 Actions Associated with the Alternative ............................ 2-22 Alternatives Considered But Not Selected for Detailed Analysis ............... 2-24 Entire Historical Range ........................................ 2-24 Specific Reaches ............................................. 2-24 Comparison of the Alternatives Studied in this DEIS ........................ 2-28 Chapter 3. Affected Environment ........................................... 3-1 Introduction ....................................................... 3-1 Middle Rio Grande .................................................. 3-1 Geography ................................................... 3-1 Climate ................................................ 3-1 Natural topography ....................................... 3-2 Political boundaries ...................................... 3-3 River reaches ........................................... 3-3 Water and Hydrology ........................................... 3-3 Irrigation history of the Middle Rio Grande .................... 3-4 River management and operations ........................... 3-5 Treaty with Mexico; Rio Grande Project ...................... 3-9 Surface flows and channel characteristics ..................... 3-10 Groundwater ........................................... 3-14 Water quality .......................................... 3-15 Water Rights and Use .......................................... 3-19 Existing water rights framework ............................ 3-20 Water supply and consumptive use .......................... 3-24 Regional water resources planning ......................... 3-26 Vegetation .................................................. 3-27 Fish and Wildlife ............................................. 3-31 Rio Grande silvery minnow ............................... 3-31 Fish communities of the Middle Rio Grande ................... 3-32 Federally-listed (threatened and endangered) species ............ 3-35 State-listed species and other species of concern ................ 3-36 Other wildlife .......................................... 3-37 Land Use Plans and Policies ..................................... 3-39 Land Ownership and Use ....................................... 3-40 vi Social and Economic Conditions ................................. 3-42 Sandoval County ....................................... 3-43 Bernalillo County ....................................... 3-44 Valencia County ........................................ 3-45 Socorro County ........................................ 3-46 Indian Trust Resources ......................................... 3-50 Environmental Justice ......................................... 3-51 Social and Cultural Values ...................................... 3-51 Cultural Resources ............................................ 3-54 Recreation .................................................. 3-56 Big Bend National Park and Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River ............... 3-58 Geography .................................................. 3-60 Climate ............................................... 3-60 Natural topography ...................................... 3-60 Political boundaries ..................................... 3-61 Water and Hydrology .......................................... 3-62 River management and operations .......................... 3-63 Surface flows and groundwater ............................. 3-63 Water quality .......................................... 3-65 Water rights and use ..................................... 3-66 Vegetation .................................................. 3-67 Fish and Wildlife ............................................. 3-68 Rio Grande silvery minnow ............................... 3-68 Fish communities of the lower Rio Grande .................... 3-68 Federally-listed (threatened and endangered) species ............ 3-68 State-listed species and other species of concern ............... 3-69 Other wildlife .......................................... 3-69 Land Use Plans and Policies ..................................... 3-70 Federal ............................................... 3-70 State and county ........................................ 3-70 Land Ownership and Use ....................................... 3-72 Social and Economic Conditions ................................. 3-72 Indian Trust Resources ......................................... 3-73 Environmental Justice ......................................... 3-73 Social and Cultural Values ...................................... 3-74 Cultural Resources ............................................ 3-74 Recreation .................................................. 3-74 Pecos River Between Sumner Dam and Brantley Reservoir ................... 3-75 Geography .................................................. 3-75 Climate ............................................... 3-75 Natural topography ...................................... 3-76 Political boundaries ..................................... 3-76 Water and Hydrology .......................................... 3-76 vii Surface flows and channel characteristics ..................... 3-76 Groundwater ........................................... 3-77 River management and operations .......................... 3-78 Water quality .......................................... 3-78 Water Rights and Management ................................... 3-79 Fort Sumner and Carlsbad Irrigation Districts .................. 3-79 Pecos River Compact .................................... 3-80 Water management for Pecos bluntnose shiner ................. 3-81 Regional water resources planning .......................... 3-82 Vegetation .................................................. 3-83 Fish and Wildlife ............................................. 3-83 Rio Grande silvery minnow ............................... 3-83 Fish communities of the middle Pecos ....................... 3-84 Federally-listed (threatened and endangered) species ............ 3-84 State-listed species and other species of concern ................ 3-85 Other wildlife .........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydraulic Modeling Analysis of the Middle Rio Grande River from Cochiti Dam to Galisteo Creek, New Mexico
    THESIS HYDRAULIC MODELING ANALYSIS OF THE MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RIVER FROM COCHITI DAM TO GALISTEO CREEK, NEW MEXICO Submitted by Susan J. Novak Department of Civil Engineering In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2006 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY October 24, 2005 WE HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER OUR SUPERVISION BY SUSAN JOY NOVAK ENTITLED HYDRAULIC MODELING ANALYSIS OF THE MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RIVER FROM COCHITI DAM TO GALISTEO CREEK, NEW MEXICO BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING IN PART REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE. Committee on Graduate Work ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ Adviser ______________________________________________ Department Head ii AB ST R A CT O F TH E SI S HYDRAULIC MODELING ANALYSIS OF THE MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FROM COCHITI DAM TO GALISTEO CREEK, NEW MEXICO Sedimentation problems with the Middle Rio Grande have made it a subject of study for several decades for many government agencies involved in its management and maintenance. Since severe bed aggradation in the river began in the late 1800’s, causing severe flooding and destroying farmland, several programs have been developed to restore the river while maintaining water quantity and quality for use downstream. Channelization works, levees, and dams were built in the early 1900’s to reduce flooding, to control sediment concentrations in the river and to promote degradation of the bed. Cochiti Dam, which began operation in 1973, was constructed primarily for flood control and sediment detention. The implementation of these channel structures also had negative effects, including the deterioration of the critical habitats of some endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • July 31, 2019 Chair Karen Dunning Vice
    July 31, 2019 Chair Karen Dunning Vice- Chair Joaquin Baca Mike A. Hamman, PE CEO and Chief Engineer 1 2 EL VADO DAM On the Rio Chama - For water storage COCHITI DAM ANGOSTURA Diversion Weir ISLETA Diversion Weir SAN ACACIA Diversion Weir Bosque del Apache Refuge 3 MRGCD Priorities Meet irrigation demands while improving system efficiencies to prepare for shortages Keep Ag lands in production through use of water banking and protecting water rights Operate to minimize debt under the RG Compact. Comply with 2016 BiOp to provide ESA coverage to MRGCD and other water users in the Rio Grande basin. Perform numerous capital improvements including repairing El Vado Dam and constructing engineered levees in the urbanizing areas. Improve and expand inter-governmental partnerships to develop joint projects and leverage funding. 4 2012 to 2018 Hydrology Five of seven years were below average to much below average annual flows at the Otowi gage. 2018 was the lowest runoff since 1956. Rio Grande basin has been in Article VII storage restrictions for most of this period so the District stored allocated relinquishment credit water @El Vado Dam. District exhausted all San Juan-Chama supplies in 2018. San Juan-Chama Project shortages occurred in 2014 - 2018. The District released from El Vado in the fall to Elephant Butte in recent years to reduce potential NM RG Compact debits. 5 Upper Rio Grande Snowpack 2016 -19 6 2019 Water Operations Flows at Otowi gage are on target to exceed 1.5 M a-f making this the third highest runoff season on record.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposition and Chemistry of Bottom Sediments in Cochiti Lake, North-Central New Mexico
    DEPOSITION AND CHEMISTRY OF BOTTOM SEDIMENTS IN COCHITI LAKE, NORTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4258 Prepared in cooperation with the PUEBLO DE COCHITI DEPOSITION AND CHEMISTRY OF BOTTOM SEDIMENTS IN COCHITI LAKE, NORTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO By Jennifer T. Wilson and Peter C. Van Metre U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4258 Prepared in cooperation with the PUEBLO DE COCHITI Albuquerque, New Mexico 2000 CONTENTS Page Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Quality control............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Deposition of bottom sediment.............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: the Hydrologic System of the Middle Rio Grande Basin
    Chapter 4: The hydrologic system of the Middle Rio Grande Basin In discussions of the water resources of an area, the hydrologic system is commonly split into two components for convenience: surface water and ground water. However, in the Middle Rio Grande Basin, as in most other locales, the surface- and ground-water systems are intimately linked through a series of complex interactions. These interactions often make it difficult to recognize the boundary between the two systems. In The Rio Grande is the only river I ever this report, the surface- and ground-water systems are described separately, saw that needed irrigation. –attributed to though one of the goals of the report is to show that they are both parts of Will Rogers the hydrologic system of the Middle Rio Grande Basin and that changes in one often affect the other. As defined earlier, in this report “Middle Rio Grande Basin” refers to the geologic basin defined by the extent of deposits of Cenozoic age along the Rio Grande from about Cochiti Dam to about San Acacia. This definition includes nearly the entire ground-water basin; however, the extent of the surface-water basin is delimited topographically by drainage divides and is consequently somewhat larger than the ground-water basin. Surface-water system The most prominent hydrologic feature in the Middle Rio Grande Basin is the Rio Grande, which flows through the entire length of the basin, generally from north to south. The fifth longest river in the United States, its headwaters are in the mountains of southern Colorado. The Rio Grande is the largest river in New Mexico, with a drainage area of 14,900 square miles where it enters the Middle Rio Grande Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin
    Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program: Environmental Contaminants and their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin S# S# S# S# S#S#S# S#S#S#S# S# S# # S S# S# # S S# S# S# S# # S# S# S S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# S# # S# S# # S S#S# S S# S# S# S# #S# S# S# S# S#S S# # S# SS# S# S# S#S# Scientific Investigations Report 2004—5108 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. The U.S. map shows the Rio Grande Basin (green) and stations sampled in this study (orange). Shown in gray are major river basins and stations in the conterminous U.S. sampled during other Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends Program (BEST) investigations. Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program: Environmental Contaminants and their Effects on Fish in the Rio Grande Basin By Christopher J. Schmitt, Gail M. Dethloff, Jo Ellen Hinck, Timothy M. Bartish, Vicki S. Blazer, James J. Coyle, Nancy D. Denslow, and Donald E. Tillitt Scientific Investigations Report 2004—5108 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Mexico
    Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Mexico December 12, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45430 {222A0E69-13A2-4985-84AE-73CC3DFF4D02}-R-065134085251065165027250227152136081055238021128244192097047169070027044111226189083158176100054014174027138098149076081229242065001223143228213208120077243222253018219014073197030033204036098221153115024066109133181160249027233236220178084 SUMMARY R45430 Sharing the Colorado River and the December 12, 2018 Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Nicole T. Carter Specialist in Natural Mexico Resources Policy The United States and Mexico share the waters of the Colorado River and the Rio Grande. A bilateral water treaty from 1944 (the 1944 Water Treaty) and other binational agreements guide Stephen P. Mulligan how the two governments share the flows of these rivers. The binational International Boundary Legislative Attorney and Water Commission (IBWC) administers these agreements. Since 1944, the IBWC has been the principal venue for addressing river-related disputes between the United States and Mexico. The 1944 Water Treaty authorizes the IBWC to develop rules and to issue proposed decisions, Charles V. Stern called minutes, regarding matters related to the treaty’s execution and interpretation. Specialist in Natural Resources Policy Water Delivery Requirements Established in Binational Agreements. The United States’ and Mexico’s water-delivery obligations derive from multiple treaty sources and vary depending on the body of water. Under the 1944 Water Treaty, the United States is required to provide Mexico with 1.5 million acre-feet (AF) of Colorado River water annually. The 1944 Water Treaty also addresses the nations’ respective rights to waters of the Rio Grande downstream of Fort Quitman, TX. It requires Mexico to deliver to the United States an annual minimum of 350,000 AF of water, measured in five-year cycles (i.e., 1.75 million AF over five years).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Written Testimony Submitted to the United States Senate Committee On
    Written Testimony Submitted to the United States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on S. 1012 New Mexico Drought Preparedness Act of 2017 Respectfully Submitted By Mike A. Hamman, PE Chief Executive Officer Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District Rio Grande Water Development in New Mexico The Upper Rio Grande originates in the San Juan and Sangre de Cristo mountain ranges in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico. It bisects the San Luis Valley in Colorado and the entire state of New Mexico with this reach culminating at Fort Quitman, Texas. This portion of the Rio Grande is administered under the Rio Grande Compact by a federal appointee and three Commissioners from Colorado, New Mexico and Texas with support from the United States Geological Survey, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the Army Corps of Engineers. The annual mean flow as measured at the Otowi gage in New Mexico is 1 million acre-feet with wide variation, ranging from 250,000 to 2.5 million acre-feet. Irrigated agriculture consists of approximately 600,000 acres in Colorado, 200,000 acres in New Mexico, 100,000 acres in Texas. Additionally, up to 60,000 acre-feet is delivered to lands within the Republic of Mexico via the Rio Grande Project under the 1906 Convention between the United States and Mexico. The predominate crop due to climate, water supplies and labor considerations is alfalfa. Other crops include potatoes, chilé, corn, fruit, onions and pecans. There is an improving ‘farm to table’ market serving a demand for locally produced agricultural products ranging from lettuces to melons as well as organically grown products particularly near and in municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande Project
    Rio Grande Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Rio Grande Project.............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................6 Construction History .....................................................7 Post-Construction History................................................15 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................22 Conclusion............................................................25 Suggested Readings ...........................................................25 About the Author .............................................................25 Bibliography ................................................................27 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................27 Government Documents .................................................27 Articles...............................................................27 Books ................................................................29 Newspapers ...........................................................29 Other Sources..........................................................29 Index ......................................................................30 1 Rio Grande Project At the twentieth
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Natural Resources, and the Urban Landscape 42 Chapter Two
    CHAPTER TWO WATER: A LIMITING FACTOR D E C I S I O N - M A K E R S FIELD CONFERENCE 2009 The Albuquerque Region 40 CHAPTER TWO The diversion dam on the Rio Grande just south of the Alameda bridge. EISEY H DRIEL © A DECISION-MAKERS FIELD GUIDE 2009 WATER: A LIMITING FACTOR 41 Water Supply Limitations in the Albuquerque Area Deborah L. Hathaway, S. S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc. ater: the limiting factor. Albuquerque residents This water supply is highly variable from year to year Wand their political leaders are familiar with but in part can be stored by the Middle Rio Grande this concept, as are urban planners and developers. Conservancy District (MRGCD) at El Vado Reservoir. Water is a high-profile hurdle that confronts urban Native surface water represented by upstream inflow at development and attracts uncountable legal and the Otowi gage (with adjustment for upstream storage engineering efforts. Legions of attorneys and engineers and imported water) is subject to apportionment under make careers of developing “innovative” schemes the Rio Grande Compact, which caps native surface to surmount the water supply hurdle, and although water inflow available for depletion in New Mexico. these may be time-consuming and expensive, seldom Native surface water comprises the bulk of water used does lack of water impede a strongly motivated and for agriculture in the Albuquerque area and is diverted well-financed development plan. “Finding water” often into MRGCD canals at Angostura. Further north and results in a water transfer, for example, a shift of water south within the Albuquerque Basin, water for irriga- from agricultural to urban uses.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Action Area: Overview of Project Components and Water Operations 2.1 Action Area
    Joint Biological Assessment Part I – Water Management 2. Action Area: Overview of Project Components and Water Operations 2.1 Action Area The project area is the area where Reclamation’s and the non-Federal entities’ proposed actions occur, while the action area is defined as “all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely the immediate area involved in the action” (50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 402.02). For this BA, the project area and action area are considered to be the same. The action area for this consultation includes Heron Reservoir and Willow Creek downstream from Heron Dam, the Rio Chama downstream from the confluence with Willow Creek, and in the Rio Grande from the Velarde downstream to San Marcial above the full reservoir pool of Elephant Butte Reservoir (figure 1). The lateral extent of the action area generally is defined by the riverside drains and associated levees located to the east and west of the main stem of the river. In situations where levees do not exist on either or both sides, the lateral extents are confined by the historical flood plain (geological constraints, such as terraces and rock outcroppings or anthropogenic constraints, such as irrigation facilities). The river mile (RM) designations used in this document are those included in the 2002 controlled aerial photography. Caballo Dam is considered RM 0, and mile designations increase in an upstream direction. 2.2 Overview of Project Components This section provides background on the SJC Project and the MRG Project, which is necessary to identify the nature and limitations of both Reclamation’s discretionary actions and non-Federal actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Modeling of Isleta Diversion Dam Gate Operation Hydraulics to Minimize Sediment Effects
    NUMERICAL MODELING OF ISLETA DIVERSION DAM GATE OPERATION HYDRAULICS TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT EFFECTS Drew C. Baird, Hydraulic Engineer, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado, [email protected]; Michael Sixta, Hydraulic Engineer, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado, [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Isleta Diversion Dam was constructed in 1934 by the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District (MRGCD) as part of their irrigation system, and is located on the Rio Grande about 10 miles south of Albuquerque, New Mexico, immediately downstream from the Highway 147 Bridge (Figure 1). The diversion dam was rehabilitated by Reclamation in 1955 as part of the Middle Rio Grande Project, authorized by Congress in the 1948 and 1950 Flood Control Acts. The Middle Rio Grande (MRG) has long been recognized for its characteristics of high sediment loads and dynamic channel conditions (Happ, 1948; Lagasse, 1980; Makar, 2010). The Isleta Diversion Dam consists of 30 river gates, three headworks gates on the Peralta Main canal (east side), and four headworks gates on the Belen Highline canal (west side) of the dam (Figure 2). The headworks gates are located in a sluiceway with a downstream gate used to maintain a maximum diversion head. Gate operations are used to provide water to downstream irrigators, meet downstream flow requirements of the 2003 Endangered Species Biological Opinion (USFWS, 2003), and manage sediment. Within the context of these multiple water use needs, a one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) fixed bed hydraulic models, sluiceway hydraulics, and sediment incipient motion analysis has been completed to provide recommendations on gate operations that would help reduce sediment impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation and Coordination
    Brantley and Avalon Reservoirs RMPA Final Environmental Assessment February 2011 CHAPTER 5: CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION The preparation of the Brantley and Avalon Reservoirs Resource Management Plan Amendment (RMPA) Environmental Assessment (EA) required a comprehensive consultation and coordination effort throughout the RMPA planning process. The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) initiated the RMPA planning process in July 2006 by requesting comments to determine the scope of issues and concerns that needed to be addressed in this Final EA document. As part of the resource inventory phase of the planning process, members of the interdisciplinary team formally and informally contacted various relevant agencies to request data to supplement Reclamation’s existing resource database. This chapter describes the coordination with agencies that either have jurisdiction by law or interest in the development of the RMPA for the Project Area. In addition, this chapter describes the public involvement process that was undertaken for the Brantley and Avalon Reservoirs RMPA project and provides a distribution list of agencies and organizations receiving a copy of this Final EA. Written comments received on the Draft EA document, along with Reclamation responses, are provided in Appendix D. 5.1 CONSULTATION A number of Federal and State government agencies, as well as local governments, were consulted during the RMPA planning process through communications, meetings, and other cooperative efforts. Cooperating agencies for this EA are the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Carlsbad Irrigation District (CID). Additional government agencies consulted included the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the New Mexico State Historic Preservation Office (NMSHPO), the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish (NMDGF), and 19 Native American Tribes.
    [Show full text]