St. David Watershed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

St. David Watershed ....,.7-/(. c ll9 ~ I FIELD EXAMINATION REPORT ST. DAVID WATERSHED Cochise County, Arizona UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE ST, DAVID WATERSHED PROJECT, /fl COCHISE COUNTYJ ARIZONA F I E L D E X A M I N A T I 0 N R E P O R T JULY 1976 Sponsoring Local Organizations San Pedro Natural Resource Conservation District St. David Irrigation District Cochise County Board of Supervisors St. David Flood Control District Prepared by: U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Soil Conservation Service, under the authorities of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (Public Law 566-83rd Congress). - OEPARTMENT OF - UBRA~A~!~,:i~o;{~~IVES SEP 23 1983 CONTENTS Summary General 1 Sponsoring Local Organizations 1 Project Status 1 Acknowledgment 2 Environmental Setting 3 Watershed Problems and Needs 5 Plan Development 7 Possible Changes in Watershed Boundary and Scope of Study 8 Possible Conflicts and Restraints Downstream Water Rights 9 Conclusions 9 FIGURES Following page Figure 1 Watershed terrain 6 Figure 2 - Watershed terrain Figure 3 - Cropland erosion damage Figure 4 - Flood damage Figure 5 - Flood damage Figure 6 - Flood damage Figure 7 - Flood damage Figure 8 - Sediment damage Figure 9 - Erosion damage Figure 10 - Erosion damage MAPS General Land Ownership Land Use ST. DAVID WATERSHED COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA FIELD EXAMINATION REPORT JULY 1976 SUMMARY General The watershed sponsors have submitted an application to the Secretary of Agriculture for assistance in planning and carrying out works· of improvement in the St. David Watershed under the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (Public Law 566-83, Congress). This report presents the results of reconnaissance level studies conducted to date in the watershed. The report will accompany a request to the Administrator, Soil Conservation Service, for planning authorization. Detailed studies and investigations will then be conducted. Sponsoring Local Organizations The watershed sponsors as stated in the application for assistance are the San Pedro Soil Conservation District, St. David Irrigation District, and Cochise County Board of Supervisors. There are two changes in sponsorship to be madeo One is the name change from San Pedro Soil Conservation District to the San Pedro Natural Resource Conservation District. The other is to add the St. David Flood Control District as an official sponsor. This district was formed in accordance with state statutes in September 1973 after the application for assistance was submitted. Project Status Reconnaissance level studies have been conducted by the U. S. Department of Agriculture as part of the U.S.D.A. Santa Cruz-San Pedro Cooperative River Basin Study. Public information meetings were held in the community of St. David on January 23, 1973; October 23, 1973; and March 16, 1976. An on-site inter-agency field examination of the watershed was conducted by the sponsors on March 16, 1976. All of these sources were most valuable in defining watershed conditions, problems and needs, possible solu• tions, local desires, and areas of possible conflict. This report summarizes information on the watershed as collected to date. 1 Acknowledgment The cooperation of the sponsors, individuals, organizations, and of federal, state, and local agencies who directly or indirectly aided in the preparation of this report is gratefully acknowledged. General highway maps prepared by the Arizona Department of Transportation were used in preparing the maps of the study area. Pictures in this report were supplied by several individuals. Appreciation is given to the University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona for permission to quote Arizona Place Names in describing the history of the founding of the town of St. David. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The St. David Watershed is located in western Cochise County, Arizona. The watershed drains westward fro'm Knob Hill on the western slopes of the Dragoon Mountains to the San Pedro River, a tributary to the Gila River. The watershed contains 8,320 acres (13 square miles), of which 4,490 acres are State Trust lands and 3,830 acres are in private ownership. (See General Land Ownership Map.) The unincorporated town of St. David, population 750, is within the watershed. The remainder of the watershed is uninhabited. Land use within the total watershed consists of 160 acres of urban and 1, 000 acres of irrigated cropland in the town of St. David and 7,160 acres of range• land east of the town. (See Land Use Map.) St. David is an agriculturally-oriented community founded by Mormon settlers in 1877. The following quote from Arizona Place Names describes the founding of the town. " .....•. During the first year at St. David the colonists built a small rock fort measuring sixty feet and forming a hollow square. The fort was three miles south of the present town. The old town was half mile south of the present town, but the site was moved because malaria was too prevalent at the first location. The first town MacDonald (cf. MacDonald) was named for Alexander F. MacDonald, a Mormon apostle, who was killed by the same mob which killed Joseph Smith in MissourL P.O. est. July 25, 1882. Joseph McRae, p.m •.... " ]) St. David residents have small gardens, orchards or farms in individual ownership of irrigated cropland ranging in size from one to sixty acres. Most households have supplemental income over that received from agricultural endeavors. Local employment consists of food and service establishments and state and county employment. Other nearby employment opportunities are at the explosives manu• facturing firm located just west of town across the San Pedro River and in the towns of Benson and Tombstoneo The 1970 census average unemploy• ment rate for Cochise County was 5.1 percent and per capita income was $2,563. This same rate would be applicable to St. David. The irrigated acreage in the watershed produces primarily forage crops for local livestock production" A small portion of the irrigated acreage is used for gardens and orchards. The St. David Irrigation District provides irrigation water by means of an unlined canal running north and west through the town. The canal begins 6 miles south of town where water is diverted from the San Pedro River. Surface supplies are supplemented during periods of low 1/ Reprinted by permission of Arizona Place Names, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona. Copyright, 1960. 3 river flow by two wells located at the upper end of the canal. There are no perennial streams in the watershed. Washes in the watershed are ephemeral; flowing only during and immediately after heavy thunderstorms. U.S. Highway 80 runs through St. David, and continues southeast through Tombstone, Bisbee and Douglas. U.S. Route 80 joins Interstate 10 at Benson, about 7 miles north of St. David. Tucson is about 52 miles northwest of St. David. The town of Sierra Vista and Fort Huachuca, a large military complex, are 30 miles south of St. David. Land values range from $500 per acre for rangeland to $4,000 per acre for urban and agricultural land. Home values range from $10,000 to $35,000. Two subdivisions and a mobile home park are new in the community to meet the needs of local people, as well as persons retiring to this area. Tourist attractions are as close as Tombstone, "The town too tough to die," which is located eighteen miles south of St. David. Recrea• tional facilities are available in the national forest lands in the nearby Whetstone, Rincon, Winchester and Dragoon Mountains. Deer, javelina, dove, quail and other small game attract hunters. The nearest public water-based recreation exists at Patagonia Lake (60 miles), Parker Canyon Lake (54 miles), and Pena Blanca Lake (84 miles). Climatic conditions are semi-arid with average annual precipitation of approximately 12 inches. Sixty percent of the precipitation occurs as rainfall during the summer months of July, August and September. Elevations in the watershed range from 3,580 to 4,680 feet (MSL). Temper• atures range from a low of 27° to a high of 107°. The.average monthly mean temperature is 52.3° with an average frost-free period of 226 days. Soils in the upper portion of the watershed are of the White House• Tubac-Forrest and Cruces associations. Soils of this association are typically deep, well drained, nearly level to hilly fine textured soils with lime accumulations at moderate depths. These soils have a high shrink-swell ration. Soils of the Cruces association are shallow, well drained, nearly level to strongly sloping fine textured soils with a lime cemented hardpan at shallow depths. Soils in the central portion of the watershed are of the Rough Broken Land-Gullied Land association. This association is composed of steep, and very steep deeply dissected land with many deep gullies and numerous moderately deep and shallow gullies (See Figure 1). Surface textures are gravelly loamy sand, and gravelly sand over thick beds of stratified silty clay loam to gravelly sandy loam alluvial deposits. The lower portions of the watershed have soils mainly of the Comoro• Anthony-Grabe association. These are deep, well drained, nearly level, medium and moderately coarse textured soils. Deep gullies are actively headcutting in these soils (See Figure 2). 4 The terraces are dissected and are presently eroding rapidly in a narrow band crossing the watershed just east of St. David. In the lower portion of the watershed the valley fill deposits are overlain by low alluvial fans and San Pedro River Alluvium. The erosion rates in the watershed vary from 0.2 to 2.0 acre-feet per square mile annually. The watershed is in the Southeastern Arizona Basin and Range Land Resource Areas. Rangeland vegetation consists predominantly of whitehorn, tarbush, creosote bush and mesquite. Other common species include black grama grass, bush muhly, tobosa, spike dropseed, alkali sacaton, sacaton, ocotillo ratany and catclaw.
Recommended publications
  • Trip Report for Travel to Arizona the Week of January 23 , 2006
    Trip Report for Travel to Arizona the Week of January 23rd, 2006. William B. Reed, Senior Hydrologist, NOAA’s NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Itinerary: Traveled to Tucson on Monday, January 23, 2006; and returned from Tucson to Salt Lake City on Friday January 27, 2006. During the week I was accompanied by Michael Schaffner, Service Hydrologist, Tucson. Mike prearranged field logistics (including the borrowing of survey equipment) that provided for a very productive and conducive trip. Monday night – Tucson Tuesday night – Tucson Wednesday night – Safford Thursday night – Safford Part of Tuesday, Mike and I were joined by Elise Moore, County Floodplain Manager, Pinal County Department of Public Works, P.O. Box 727, Florence, AZ 85232. Noon Creek. Photo by Mike Schaffner (January 2006). Purpose: To visit river forecast points, meet with hydrologic customers, evaluate flood hazards at locations removed from stream gages, and collect hydrologic data related to recent burn-area peak flows. The later will be included in a peer-review journal article that Bill and Mike are completing related to post-burn runoff. (See picture previous page: Bill Reed measuring depth of peak flow water surface with survey rod. A tape measure has been stretched across the channel to correspond to the water surface at time of peak flow. Noon Creek is a 3 square mile watershed in the Pinaleno Mountains of Graham County. Water encompassed a cross sectional area 110 feet wide and a minimum of 10.5 feet deep at the time of peak flow to yield a peak flow in excess of 2,500 cfs.) Accomplishments: Monday: Madera Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of the San Pedro River Roundup
    Friends of the San Pedro River Roundup Winter 2014 In This Issue: Bioblitz... Lectures... Film Festival... Executive Director’s Report... Festival of Arts... BLM Acting Director’s Visit... Archeology & Heritage Month... Dark Skies Position... Ron Beck’s Big Year... Christmas Bird Count Results... Trees along the 19th-Century River... Brunckow’s Cabin Rehab... EOP Leaders Sought... Walkway Bricks... Operations Committee... Members ... Calendar ... Contacts Save the Date! The morning of April 26, FSPR will hold a Bioblitz (an inventory of the flora and fauna) at various locations in SPRNCA. Stay tuned for details in the coming weeks. FSPR Lectures February & March 20 JoinPawlowski, us on Thursday, Water Sentinels February Program 20 at 7 Coordinatorpm at the Sierra for the Vista Grand Ranger Canyon District Chapter Office, of 4070the Sierra East AvenidaClub, will Saracino, Hereford, for a lecture by Becky Orozco on the Chiracahua Apache. Then, on March 20, Steve discuss ecology and conservation of the San Pedro River; current threats; and the conservation work of the Sentinels within SPRNCA. Learn how to use citizen science, “hands-on” conservation, and advocacy to shape a more-sustainable future for one of the Southwest’s most ecologically significant rivers. Second Annual Wild & Scenic Film Festival March 13 & 14 The Friends have been invited to host our second Wild & Scenic Film Festival as part of the 12th annual event that showcases North America’s premier collection of short films on the environment. We have selected 13 films for the evening program for adults that are relevant to many of the issues facing the Southwest. Some will make you smile, some may get you angry, others will have you amazed, but hopefully, all will motivate you to get involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Notices of Public Information 3489
    Arizona Administrative Register Notices of Public Information NOTICES OF PUBLIC INFORMATION Notices of Public Information contain corrections that agencies wish to make to their notices of rulemaking; miscella- neous rulemaking information that does not fit into any other category of notice; and other types of information required by statute to be published in the Register. Because of the variety of material that is contained in a Notice of Public Information, the Office of the Secretary of State has not established a specific format for these notices. NOTICE OF PUBLIC INFORMATION DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 1. A.R.S. Title and its heading: 49, The Environment A.R.S. Chapter and its heading: 2, Water Quality Control A.R.S. Article and its heading: 2.1, Total Maximum Daily Loads A.R.S. Sections: A.R.S. § 49-232, Lists of Impaired Waters; Data Requirements; Rules 2. The public information relating to the listed statute: A.R.S. § 49-232(A) requires the Department to at least once every five years, prepare a list of impaired waters for the pur- pose of complying with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1313(d)). The Department shall provide public notice and allow for comment on a draft list of impaired waters prior to its submission to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Department shall prepare written responses to comments received on the draft list. The Department shall publish the list of impaired waters that it plans to submit initially to the regional administrator and a summary of the responses to comments on the draft list in the Arizona Administrative Register at least forty-five days before submission of the list to the regional administrator.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED Agua Fria River 341853.9 / 1120358.6 - 341804.8 / 15070102-023 Middle Gila 1120319.2 Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820/1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - end Aravaipa C 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Cienega 15050304-0001 Santa Cruz Arivaca Creek Headwaters - Puertocito/Alta Wash 15050304-008 Santa Cruz Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Arrastra Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-848 Middle Gila Ashurst Lake 15020015-0090 Little Colorado Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River Babbit Spring Wash Headwaters - Upper Lake Mary 15020015-210 Little Colorado Babocomari River Banning Creek - San Pedro River 15050202-004 San Pedro Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bear Canyon Lake 15020008-0130 Little Colorado Bear Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-046 Middle Gila Bear Wallow Creek N. and S. Forks Bear Wallow - Indian Res.
    [Show full text]
  • TMDL Deposition Document Abandoned Mines Boulder Creek - Arsenic the Final TMDL TMDL Document Hillside Mine 7/26/04 Part 1: J
    Arizona's Total Maximum Daily Load Program - History and Current Status as of 11/14/11 Bill Williams Watershed Colorado River/Grand Canyon Watershed Colorado River/Lower Gila River Watershed Little Colorado River Watershed Middle Gila Watershed Salt River Watershed San Pedro Watershed Santa Cruz River Watershed Verde River Watershed Upper Gila Watershed Bill Williams Watershed Impaired Water Pollutant(s) Status Downloadable Types of Approved Implementation Staff Covered Information Point/ by EPA Plans/Activities Contact Nonpoint Name Sources Alamo Lake Mercury Updating Model. Fact Sheet Atmospheric No No S. Fitch Draft Mercury TMDL deposition Document Abandoned mines Boulder Creek - Arsenic The final TMDL TMDL Document Hillside Mine 7/26/04 Part 1: J. Wilder Creek to report has been (abandoned), Characterization Sutter Copper Copper Creek completed. remnant Part 2: Zinc tailings piles Implementation Plan Colorado River/Grand Canyon Watershed Impaired Water Pollutant(s) Status Downloadable Types of Approved Implementation Staff Covered Information Point/ by EPA Plans/Activities Contact Nonpoint Name Sources No past or current projects in this watershed Colorado River/Lower Watershed Impaired Water Pollutant(s) Status Downloadable Types of Approved Implementation Staff Covered Information Point/ by EPA Plans/Activities Contact Nonpoint Name Sources Lower Colorado Nitrogen The final TMDL TMDL Document 1992 No J. River - Yuma USGS report has been Sutter Phosphorus Gage 0952110 to completed. International Border Little Colorado River Watershed Impaired Water Pollutant(s) Status Downloadable Types of Approved Implementation Staff Covered Information Point/ by EPA Plans/Activities Contact Nonpoint Name Sources Lake Mary (lower) Mercury Updating model Fact Sheet Under No No S. Fitch and draft TMDL.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED A Ackers East Headwaters - Ackers West 15060202-3313 Verde River Ackers West Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-3333 Verde River Agua Fria River Sycamore Creek - Bishop Creek 15070102-023 Middle Gila Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo Lake 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alder Creek Headwaters - Verde River 15060203-910 Verde River Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820 / 1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - Aravaipa Wild. Bndry 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arizona Canal (15070102) HUC boundary 15070102 - Gila River 15070102-202 Middle Gila Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River B Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bass Canyon Tributary at 322606 / 110131 15050203-899B San Pedro
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2009-1269, Appendix 2
    Appendix 2. Summary of location and basin characteristics for sites at which discharge measurements are available from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality [Hydrologic provinces: 1, Plateau Uplands; 2, Central Highlands; 3, Basin and Range Lowlands. Basin codes in Identifiers: BW, Bill Williams; CG, Colorado-Grand Canyon; Cl, Colorado- Lower Gila; LC, Little Colorado; MG, Middle Gila; SR, Salt; SP, San Pedro; SC, Santa Cruz; UG, Upper Gila; VR, Verde. <, less than; >, greater than; e, value not present in database and was estimated for the purpose of model predictions] Drainage Latitude, in Longitude, Site area, Hydrologic Hydrologic decimal in decimal altitude, square Identifier Name unit code Reach province degrees degrees feet miles CGBRA000.44 BRIGHT ANGEL CREEK - BELOW 15010001 019 1 36.10236 112.09514 2,520 100 PHANTOM RANCH CGBRA000.50 BRIGHT ANGEL CREEK - NEAR 15010001 019 1 36.10306 112.09556 2,452 101 GRAND CANYON, AZ CGCAT056.68 CATARACT CREEK NEAR GRAND 15010004 005 1 35.72333 112.44194 5,470e 1,200 CANYON, AZ USGS 09404100 CGCLE000.19 CLEAR CREEK - ABOVE COLORADO 15010001 025 1 36.08414 112.03344 2,520e 36 RIVER CGCRY000.05 CRYSTAL CREEK - ABOVE 15010002 018B 1 36.13542 112.24319 2,360 43 COLORADO RIVER CGDEE000.07 DEER CREEK - ABOVE COLORADO 15010002 019B 1 36.38931 112.50764 1,960 17 RIVER CGDIA000.06 (No name in database) 15010002 002 1 35.76556 113.37222 1,340 <946e CGGDN001.09 GARGEN CREEK - BELOW INDIAN 15010002 841 1 36.08347 112.12319 3,600 4 GARDEN CGHRM000.08 HERMIT CREEK - ABOVE COLORADO 15010002 020B
    [Show full text]
  • San Pedro Valley, Arizona
    An exploration gravity survey in the San Pedro Valley, southeastern Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Halvorson, Phyllis Heather Fett Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 12:54:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/557989 AN EXPLORATION GRAVITY SURVEY IN THE SAN PEDRO VALLEY, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA b y Phyllis Heather Fett Halverson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fullfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN GEOPHYSICS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 8 4 — r I i ,, >——» OQ a Call No. BINDING INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS INTERUBRARY STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotations from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate School when in his judg­ ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Arizona's 2016 Impaired Waters
    APPENDIX C ARIZONA’S 2016 IMPAIRED WATERS This list contains assessment units that were assessed as impaired (Category 5) by ADEQ or EPA during the current and previous assessment listing cycles (2016 listings are in bold). CAUSE(S) OF IMPAIRMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT SIZE (ACRES/MILES) (YEAR FIRST LISTED) Bill Williams Watershed Alamo Lake Ammonia (2004), mercury in fish tis- 1414 a 15030204-0040 sue (2002- EPA), high pH (1996) Bill Williams River Alamo Lake to Castaneda Wash 35.9 mi Ammonia (2006) 15030204-003 Boulder Creek Tributary at 344114/1131800 to Wilder 14.4 mi Beryllium (dissolved)(2010) Creek 15030202-006B Coors Lake 230 a Mercury in fish tissue (2004- EPA) 15030202-5000 Colorado-Grand Canyon Watershed Colorado River Lake Powell to Paria River 16.3 mi Selenium (total) (2016) 14070006-001 Colorado River Selenium (total) and suspended sedi- Parashant Canyon to Diamond Creek 27.6 mi ment concentration (2004) 15010002-003 Kanab Creek Jump-up Canyon to Colorado River 12.8 m Selenium (total) (2016) 15010003-001 Lake Powell 9770 a Mercury in fish tissue (2010- EPA) 14070006-1130 Paria River Suspended sediment concentration Utah border to Colorado River 29.4 mi (2004), E. coli (2006), selenium 14070007-123 (total) (2016) Virgin River Sullivan’s Canyon to Beaver Dam Wash 9.7 mi Selenium (total) (2012) 15010010-004 Virgin River Selenium (total) and suspended Beaver Dam Wash to Big Bend Wash 10.1 mi sediment concentration (2004), E. coli 15010010-003 (2010) Colorado-Lower Gila Watershed Colorado River Hoover Dam to Lake Mohave 40.4 mi Selenium
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Piping Erosion
    The development of piping erosion Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Jones, Neil Owen Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 12:01:34 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565170 THE DEVELOPMENT OF PIPING EROSION Neil Owen Jones, Ph. D. The University of Arizona, 1968 Director: Lawrence K. Lustlg Piping erosion is widespread in the semiarid valleys of the southwestern United States. The extensive pipe sys­ tems near Benson in the San Pedro Valley, Arizona, were studied to determine the prerequisite conditions for piping, factors affecting pipe evolution and the effect of piping on subsequent development of the drainage net. It is believed that extensive piping was initiated after arroyo-cuttlng began in the San Pedro Valley about 1890. Since that time slightly less than 10 percent of the Aravalpa Surface has been affected by piping, but the af­ fected area includes some 40 percent of the cultivated land, most of which is adjacent to the river. Field studies in­ cluded determination of the geomorphic and hydrologic set­ ting of the major pipe systems and detailed mapping of rep­ resentative pipe systems to determine the influence of local geologic structures on piping. Changes in a representative pipe system during the study period were measured. Se­ quences of aerial photographs for the period 1935-66 indicate the long-term rate of development of pipe systems and their relation to the drainage net.
    [Show full text]
  • Section VII Potential Linkage Zones SECTION VII POTENTIAL LINKAGE ZONES
    2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 41 Section VII Potential Linkage Zones SECTION VII POTENTIAL LINKAGE ZONES Linkage 1 Linkage 2 Beaver Dam Slope – Virgin Slope Beaver Dam – Virgin Mountains Mohave Desert Ecoregion Mohave Desert Ecoregion County: Mohave (Linkage 1: Identified Species continued) County: Mohave Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis ADOT Engineering District: Flagstaff and Kingman Mohave Desert Tortoise Gopherus agassizii ADOT Engineering District: Flagstaff ADOT Maintenance: Fredonia and Kingman Mountain Lion Felis concolor ADOT Maintenance: Fredonia ADOT Natural Resources Management Section: Flagstaff Mule Deer Odocoileus hemionus ADOT Natural Resources Management Section: Flagstaff Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus Spotted Bat Euderma maculatum AGFD: Region II AGFD: Region II Virgin Chub Gila seminuda Virgin Spinedace Lepidomeda mollispinis mollispinis BLM: Arizona Strip District Woundfin Plagopterus argentissimus BLM: Arizona Strip District Congressional District: 2 Threats: Congressional District: 2 Highway (I 15) Council of Government: Western Arizona Council of Governments Urbanization Council of Government: Western Arizona Council of Governments FHWA Engineering: A2 and A4 Hydrology: FHWA Engineering: A2 Big Bend Wash Legislative District: 3 Coon Creek Legislative District: 3 Virgin River Biotic Communities (Vegetation Types): Biotic Communities (Vegetation Types): Mohave Desertscrub 100% Mohave Desertscrub 100% Land Ownership: Land Ownership: Bureau of Land Management 59% Bureau of Land Management 93% Private 27% Private
    [Show full text]
  • ADMMR Mining Collection Inventory
    ADMMR MINING COLLECTION INVENTORY Casey Brown Arizona Geological Survey OPEN-FILE REPORT OFR-12-37 September 2012 Arizona Geological Survey www.azgs.az.gov | repository.azgs.az.gov Arizona Geological Survey M. Lee Allison, State Geologist and Director Manuscript approved for publication in September 2012 Printed by the Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved For an electronic copy of this publication: www.repository.azgs.az.gov Printed copies are on sale at the Arizona Experience Store 416 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520.770.3500) For information on the mission, objectives or geologic products of the Arizona Geological Survey visit www.azgs.az.gov. This publication was prepared by an agency of the State of Arizona. The State of Arizona, or any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the State of Arizona. ___________________________ Recommended Citation: Brown, C., 2012, ADMMR mining collection. Arizona Geological Survey Open File Report, OFR-12-37, 152 p. ADMMR mining collection by Casey Brown Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 12-37 August 2012 Curating and documenting this collection was supported by the State of Arizona and the U.S. Geological Survey National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program Grant #G11AP20180. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]