Introduction Key Terms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction Key Terms TIANMUN 2017 Special Conference – 1 FORUM: Special Conference ISSUE: Preventing illegal trafficking of wild flora and fauna STUDENT OFFICER: JuHyeong Ha POSITION: President of Special Conference Introduction The rate at which the amount of wild life is diminishing on our planet is noticeable. In the past few decades alone, over 50 percent of the world’s wild flora and fauna have gone extinct. Some scientists refer to our era as the sixth period of mass extinction. However, unlike previous mass extinctions, which were driven by natural phenomena, this one has a different cause: the human race. Humans are undoubtedly the most influential species in the world. However, this influence is not always positive. From discharging excessive amounts of green house gases to deforestation and illegal trafficking of wild animals, humans have expedited extinction. In particular, the severity of wild life trafficking has become more serious. An extreme case of illegal trade is ivory trafficking. In 1979, the global population of African elephants was estimated to be around 1.3 million. However, as a result of uncontrolled ivory trade along with environmental damage to the elephant’s natural habitat, only 600,000 remained in 1989. In spite of significant decrease in elephant population, the demand for ivory is rising. Therefore, raising awareness of this issue will be a first step to stamping out illicit trade of animal products. Key Terms Flora and fauna Plants and animals. TIANMUN 2017 Special Conference – 2 Period of mass extinction Also known as extinction event or biotic crisis, a period of mass extinction is a rapid decrease in the biodiversity on Earth. In order to be considered as mass extinction, there should be a sharp decrease in the diversity and abundance of multicellular organisms. Poaching Poaching is the illegal taking of wildlife, in violation of local, state, federal or international law. Habitat destruction Habitat destruction is the process in which natural habitat is rendered unable to support the species present. History Poaching in the 1700s Even though the history of poaching reaches back to a much earlier time period, poaching became prevalent in Western Europe in 1700s. This was mainly because rural poverty was at the highest point around the 1700s, and many people had to rely on illegal animal trade to make a living. To counteract poaching, governments created traps and spring guns that would maim or even kill the poachers. In the 1830s, the law for poaching was relieved in Europe, thereby allowing people to hunt small animals and banning traps that were great threat to hunters. Decrease in tiger population in the 1940s During the 1940s, the population of Siberian tigers, a species that mainly inhabits Russia, had significantly decreased due to poaching and habitat destruction. This illegal trade and deforestation lead to a 40% decrease in the Siberian tiger population as a whole. Based on the annual tiger survey, which has 16 monitoring sites scattered across tiger’s range, less than 30 tigers were counted in the monitoring TIANMUN 2017 Special Conference – 3 areas in 1940s. Fortunately, the effort from many institutions and countries substantially increased the number of individuals up to 500 in 2005. Seal hunting Seal hunting, often called sealing, is a hunting of seals for commercial purpose. Seal hunting is currently taking place in nine countries: Canada, the United States, Namibia, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Finland, and Sweden. Among those nine countries, seal hunting is most brisk in Canada. From 1952 to 1970, Harp Seal population in the northwest Atlantic declined to approximately 2 million due to Canada’s annual kill rate, which averages 291,000. Even though hunting of newborn harp seals is outwardly banned in Canada, still countless young harp seals are killed by hunters who benefit from soft white far. Problems Raised Harm balance of nature Since all the ecosystem is closely related to each other, overexploitation of species can affect the whole system of nature. For example, overfishing does not only affects the marine ecosystem but also affects the land animals that mainly prey on fish. Wild life trade can further harm the nature by introducing invasive species. Many invasive species are purposely introduced to the ecosystem through illegal trade of animals, which threaten the balance of nature. TIANMUN 2017 Special Conference – 4 Human livelihood Although most countries have formed well-developed civilizations, there are still some places where people live in harmony with nature. These rural households in these areas mainly depend on local wild animals for food, and on local trees for fuel. Furthermore, wild flora and fauna provide components for many widely used medicines. Unlike people in cities who do not directly feel the impact of environmental exploitation, many people who live rural lifestyles are affected by such changes in the ecosystem. International Actions Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA) Migratory Bird Treaty Act was first enacted in 1916 by the United States, Great Britain, Mexico, Japan, and Russia to protect migrating birds from being hunted and sold for the profit. This act applies to both live and dead birds, and protects any bird parts, including feathers, eggs and nests. However, the migratory Bird Treaty Act allows birds to be captured for scientific, educational, or other approved purposes. The London Conference on the Illegal Wildlife Trade On February 13, 2014, the United Kingdom assembled representatives from 46 different countries and 11 organizations to address wildlife crime. At this conference, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague claimed that wildlife trafficking is as grave as, if not more grave than, drug trafficking and that further measures must be taken to shut down this global criminal industry. As a result of this conference, a declaration was signed, identifying several key categories of action: eradicating the market for illegal products, ensuring effective legal frameworks and deterrents, strengthening law enforcement, and achieving sustainable livelihoods and economic development to combat illegal wildlife trade. Key Players Wildlife Alliance TIANMUN 2017 Special Conference – 5 Wildlife Alliance, an international non-profit organization that works for wildlife and forest conservation, was found in 1994 by the group of American and British conservationists under the name Global Survival Network, and reorganized in 1999 as WildAid. The organization restructured itself again in 2006, dividing into two separate organizations: WildAid and Wildlife Alliance. Wildlife Alliance currently has programs and partnership with Cambodia, and it is headquartered in New York City with offices in Phnom Penh. From 2001, Wildlife Alliance saved over 56,000 animals from poachers and illegal trafficking. One such example of Wildlife Alliance’s ongoing program is Care for Rescued Wildlife. This program has ensured that all the rescued animals would receive expert treatment, natural enclosures, a healthy diet, and trained veterinary care for as long as necessary. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) World Wildlife Fund is an international non-governmental organization that works in the field of wilderness preservation and reduction of humanity’s footprint on the environment. This organization was found in 1961, and now became the world’s largest conservation organization with over five million supporters worldwide, working in more than 100 countries with around 1,300 environmental projects. World Wildlife Fund is currently trying to tackle illegal wildlife trade through the Wildlife Crime Technology Project. This project aims to provide rangers with affordable wildlife tracking devices and rifle shot recognition software. By doing so, the governing bodies will have head start against poachers and thus will be able to counteract poaching more efficiently. ASEAN Wildlife Enforcement Network (ASEAN-WEN) TIANMUN 2017 Special Conference – 6 The ASEAN Wildlife Enforcement Network was found on December 1, 2005, as a regional inter- agency and inter-governmental initiative to stand against illegal cross-board trade of flora and fauna. ASEAN-WEN is comprised of ten countries including Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam, and Thailand forming an intergovernmental law- enforcement network. ASEAN-WEN promotes implementation of national wildlife protection laws and international species protection treaties to eradicate illegal wildlife trafficking happening in Southeast Asia by disassembling major wildlife trafficking network. Possible Solutions Enhanced supervision of illegal trafficking Governments can establish organizations where wildlife law enforcement officers are raised and sent across the globe to identify illegally sold or illegally procured items before they cross borders. Well trained officers can also tighten the supervision of traded products. These organizations will prevent illegal trade from of flora and fauna. Employing surveillance technology Innovative drone technology is being tested in Kenya. In addition to the benefit of night vision with thermal imaging, drone technology allows rangers to remotely check a large area. Although this technology is not yet perfect, initial trials have proved successful and it may be utilizable in the near future. Enforce CITES through national and regional legislation CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) is an international
Recommended publications
  • 2017 Annual Report Direct Protection to Forests and Wildlife
    2017 Annual Report Direct protection to forests and wildlife. Photo by Jeremy Holden Cover photo by Jeremy Holden Rainforest Protection 3,548Patrols 143,500Km2 patrolled 151Legal cases filed 21,589Snares removed 302Live animals rescued The Cardamom Rainforest Landscape is a 10,000 km2 reef-to- ridge protected area complex forming a critical part of the Indo- Burma global biodiversity hotspot. The Cardamoms are significant for biodiversity conservation supporting more than 50 IUCN threatened species of vertebrates. The landscape is also the most important watershed for southwest Cambodia, providing ecosystem services as the region’s largest climate regulator and carbon sink. Wildlife Alliance works with the Royal Government of Cambodia to protect the Cardamom Rainforest Landscape through robust on-the-ground law enforcement, patrolling, and judicial follow- up, with a focus on creating high performance law enforcement teams with Zero Tolerance for Corruption. In 2017, Wildlife Alliance employed 92 rangers in 15 teams supervised by 15 Wildlife Alliance law enforcement professionals operating from 7 fully-equiped law enforcement stations and patrolling across 8,347 km2 of the Cardamom Rainforest Landscape. Southern Cardamom Koh Pao Area Patrolled: 970 km2 Rainforest Protection Snares Removed: 6,289 Chainsaws Seized: 7 Animals Rescued: 47 Program Veal Pi Results by Area Patrolled: 975 km2 Ranger Station Snares Removed: 2,562 Chainsaws Seized: 5 Chhay Areang Animals Rescued: 31 Area Patrolled: 628 km2 Snares Removed: 2,740 Chainsaws Seized:
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies from the Mekong Subregion Jörn Dosch June 2010
    Balancing Trade Growth and Environmental Protection in ASEAN: Case studies from the Mekong subregion Jörn Dosch June 2010 1. The environment and trade grown annually by an average of 19 percent in the period of 1994–2006. However, as a share of total trade, in the Mekong region intraregional trade still accounts for only 24 percent due to limited complementarities. iii The Mekong River is the world’s twelfth-largest river and Southeast Asia’s longest waterway. It originates in Tibet At the same time, illegal trade is still a matter of fact. Most and flows through the Chinese province of Yunnan before crucially, the biodiversity within the GMS continues to be continuing southwards, touching the territories of six threatened by rampant and unchecked wildlife and timber countries and ending in the South China Sea. The Greater trade. The region is home to some of the richest and most Mekong Subregion (GMS) is composed of Thailand, Lao biologically diverse habitats in the world. Its forests range PDR, Cambodia, Myanmar, Vietnam, and two Chinese from evergreen and semi-evergreen, to mixed deciduous, provinces: the Guanxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and deciduous dipterocarp, iv panoramic grasslands, swamp Yunnan Province. i The GMS covers some 2.3 million forests and mangroves. v Four of the six deciduous square kilometres and contains a population of about 245 dipterocarp species in the world are found in this million people. The subregion has been characterized by subregion. vi Approximately 20,000 plant species, 1,200 centrally planned market systems, but is moving into a bird species, 800 reptile and amphibian species, and 430 process of transition towards closer integration with mammal species also inhabit the region, and more are external markets and increasing trade orientation as a being discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Partnerships for Conservation in the Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia
    Volume 10: Protected Areas and Sustainable Tourism 53 Developing Partnerships for Conservation in the Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia P. Dearden1, S. Gauntlet2 and B. Nollen3 1University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada 2Wildlife Alliance, Phnom Penh, Cambodia 3 International Consultancy Europe, Bangkok, Thailand Abstract Protected areas owned and operated by national agencies have long been the mainstay of global conservation planning. However much more needs to be done to conserve the biodiversity of the broader landscape than can be achieved solely within the confines of protected area systems run by national governments. This paper describes an initiative in the Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia, where conservation planning embraces a large number of stakeholders using a variety of approaches to achieve conservation goals. The Cardamom Mountains cover some 880 000 ha of seasonal rainforest in SW Cambodia and are thought to be the largest contiguous extent of this forest formation remaining in mainland SE Asia. Many species, such as elephants, tigers, banteng and dhole that are regionally rare can still be found in the forests. The area is also home to the world’s largest population of Siamese crocodiles and various other critically endangered species, especially turtles. The area is coming under increasing pressure from both legal and illegal activities and conservation groups have been pro- active in designing and implementing a variety of approaches that accept the needs for economic development, but strive to achieve this in a sustainable manner. In the South West Cardamoms Wildlife Alliance, a US-based NGO has partnered with the private sector to access funds that allow such plans to be implemented in a manner consistent with government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Wildlife Assessment PDFX
    UGANDA WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING REPORT ASSESSMENT APRIL 2018 Alessandra Rossi TRAFFIC REPORT TRAFFIC is a leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. Reproduction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organisations con cern ing the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published by: TRAFFIC International David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK © TRAFFIC 2018. Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. ISBN no: UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Suggested citation: Rossi, A. (2018). Uganda Wildlife Trafficking Assessment. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Front cover photographs and credit: Mountain gorilla Gorilla beringei beringei © Richard Barrett / WWF-UK Tree pangolin Manis tricuspis © John E. Newby / WWF Lion Panthera leo © Shutterstock / Mogens Trolle / WWF-Sweden Leopard Panthera pardus © WWF-US / Jeff Muller Grey Crowned-Crane Balearica regulorum © Martin Harvey / WWF Johnston's three-horned chameleon Trioceros johnstoni © Jgdb500 / Wikipedia Shoebill Balaeniceps rex © Christiaan van der Hoeven / WWF-Netherlands African Elephant Loxodonta africana © WWF / Carlos Drews Head of a hippopotamus Hippopotamus amphibius © Howard Buffett / WWF-US Design by: Hallie Sacks This report was made possible with support from the American people delivered through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of USAID or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTER WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING DIGEST: SOUTHEAST ASIA and CHINA, 2020 Issue IV, May 2021
    Saman Ranasinghe USAID WILDLIFE ASIA COUNTER WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING DIGEST: SOUTHEAST ASIA AND CHINA, 2020 Issue IV, May 2021 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by RTI International for the USAID Wildlife Asia Activity, AID-468-I-16-0001, TO AID-486-TO-16-0003. The contents of this study/report are the sole responsibility of RTI International and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. USAID WILDLIFE ASIA Counter Wildlife Trafficking Digest: Southeast Asia and China, 2020 Issue IV, May 2021 Contract Number: AID-468-I-16-00001, TO AID-486-To-16-00003 Activity Start and End Date: August 31, 2016 to August 30, 2021 COR Name: Craig Kirkpatrick Submitted by: Peter Collier, USAID Wildlife Asia Chief of Party 208 Wireless Road, Unit 406 Lumpini, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330 Thailand Cover Photo: African Elephant © Saman Ranasingh TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... V BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... VII 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 COVID-19 ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Could REDD Help Save an Embattled Forest in Cambodia?
    English (Chinese) Deutsch (German) Español (Spanish) Français (French) Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian) Italiano (Italian) (Japanese) Português (Portuguese) Could REDD help save an embattled forest in Cambodia? by Rhett A. Butler on 28 October 2016 REDD in Cambodia has faced many obstacles, but now one long-awaited project has just gotten the green light to proceed. Wildlife Alliance is pushing forward with a REDD project that aims to finance the newly established Southern Cardamom National Park's ongoing protection. In an October 2016 interview with Mongabay.com, Gauntlett spoke about the Southern Cardamoms and her hopes for the project. ver the past three decades, few countries lost forest cover faster than Cambodia: over a quarter of the country’s forests were cleared since 1990. Much of that O destruction was driven by logging and conversion for agriculture and plantations. In the late 2000s, Cambodia’s rapid rate of forest loss seemed to make it an ideal candidate for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD), a performance-based approach to conservation that gained traction after 2007 climate talks in Bali, Indonesia. Under REDD, Cambodia would get paid for its success in curbing deforestation of its carbon-dense tropical forests. But REDD has evolved substantially since those days, morphing from what some early backers saw primarily as a market-based carbon trading mechanism into something considerably more complex that currently involves aid-like government to government transfers, philanthropic investments, and voluntary carbon offset markets. Conversations around REDD have also become more nuanced, with recognition of local communities’ rights, land tenure reform, protections for biodiversity, and other safeguards becoming central criteria for project design and implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Cardamom Redd+ Project
    CCB & VCS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CCB Version 3, VCS Version 3 THE SOUTHERN CARDAMOM REDD+ PROJECT Document Prepared by Wildlife Works CCB v3.0, VCS v3.3 1 CCB & VCS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CCB Version 3, VCS Version 3 Project Title The Southern Cardamom REDD+ Project Version 2.0 Date of Issue 26-November-2018 Project Location Cambodia, Koh Kong Province Royal Government of Cambodia, Ministry of Environment Contact Name: Choup Paris, Deputy Secretary General, National Council Project Proponent(s) for Sustainable Development Email : [email protected] Phone : (+855) 17 31 33 66 Wildlife Works Carbon LLC Prepared By Contact Name: Brian Williams Email: [email protected] Phone: (415) 331-8081 SCS Global Services Contact Name: Christie Pollet-Young Validation Body Email: [email protected] Phone: (510) 452-9093 Project Lifetime 01 January 2015 – 31 December 2044; 30-year lifetime GHG Accounting Period 01 January 2015 – 31 December 2044; 30-year lifetime History of CCB Status This is the CCB Project validation Gold Level Criteria: Climate and Biodiversity. The SCRP aims to generate exceptional benefits in the areas of climate and biodiversity under both the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) and Climate, Community and Biodiversity (CCB) standards. Climate: The Project will prevent the emission of an average of 3,580,834 Gold Level Criteria tonnes CO2e annually by avoiding deforestation and forest degradation. This will be achieved largely by training on improved agricultural methods, creating alternative income sources, creating new jobs and employment opportunities, and supporting improved environmental law enforcement across the landscape. Community members and project stakeholders were consulted during this period to determine the Project’s expected benefits, costs and risks to them, and to identify the indicators to be used to measure these impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Wildlife Trade in Southeast Asia Evolution, Trajectory and How to Stop It
    Contributor: Name Lastname Illicit Wildlife Trade in Evolution, Trajectory Southeast Asia and How to Stop It This material is offered free of charge for personal, official, educational and non-commercial use, provided the source is acknowledged. The material may not be altered prior to dissemi- nation in any way. For further information please contact [email protected] Copyright: Analytical Centre of Excellence on Trafficking (ACET), 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Challenges 3 Opportunities 4 Evolution of Wildlife Trafficking in Southeast Asia and China 5 Wildlife Business Trends in Southeast Asia and China: Past, Present, and Future 5 Signs Of Poaching Spikes On Horizon: China In 1980’s 5 Sourcing Evolution 6 North Korean Connection 6 China Expands Direct Sourcing 7 Enforcement Affects Supply Chains 7 Vietnam: Sub-Contract Role for Chinese Companies 8 Thailand as an International Hub 8 Laos: Trafficker Haven and Entrepôt 10 Traffickers Adapt to Increased Thai Enforcement 10 Enforcement Up, Supplies Down: Asian Traffickers Look to Africa 11 African and Asian Dealers Connect 13 2010-Present: Disruption and Displacement 13 Evolution of the Counter-Wildlife Trafficking Response 15 Networks to Counter Trafficking Networks 15 ASEAN-WEN and Its Working Groups 16 Capacity Building with ASEAN-WEN 17 Phase II of ASEAN-WEN Support – the ARREST Program 17 Operation Cobra I 19 Operation Cobra II 19 Operation Cobra III 19 Overall CWT Results (2006-2016) 19 ASEAN Beyond 2020 – Which Direction Can CWT Efforts Go? 21 Current Status
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    Annual Report 2018 Cardamom Rainforest Protection Cardamom Rainforest Landscape Cambodia 8,350 km2 Protected by Wildlife Alliance since 2001 A critical part of the Indo-Burma Biodiversity Hotspot supporting >50 IUCN threatened species 19,986 snares removed 7 ranger stations 110 forest rangers Cardamom Judicial Actions Rainforest Protection and Prosecutions Wildlife Alliance are effectively, and are motivated and led by Effective judicial action and prosecutions demoralizing for law enforcement rangers. the leaders in the Direct inspirational supervisors. This leadership against wildlife criminals are necessary Protection of Forests and and supervision which we provide is to back up the on-the-ground work of Wildlife Alliance works intensively, and Wildlife in tropical Asia. The critical. We create a culture of excellence in forest rangers. Not only do prosecutions face-to-face, with the Cambodian judiciary, 110 rangers of our Rainforest Protection conservation, high performance, and zero and custodial sentences act as a deterrent including judges and prosecutors, to Program safeguard 8,350-km2 of the tolerance for corruption. to future poaching and illegal activity but ensure that serious criminal poachers face Cardamom Rainforest Landscape: the they are also important for the morale of maximum punishment under Cambodian Amazon of Asia. Our approach is not During 2018 our ranger field teams: field rangers. Witnessing poachers that law. This requires precision, persistence, that of a traditional conservation NGO » Conducted 3,229 patrols which they have arrested being let-off by the and, where necessary, making high level and we do not implement the failed covered more than 130,000-km authorities due to indifference, corruption, political interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAFFIC ILLEGAL OTTER TRADE REPORT an Analysis of Seizures in Selected Asian Countries (1980–2015)
    TRAFFIC ILLEGAL OTTER TRADE REPORT An analysis of seizures in selected Asian countries (1980–2015) Lalita Gomez, Boyd T. C. Leupen, Meryl Theng, Katrina Fernandez JULY 2016 and Melissa Savage Otter Specialist Group TRAFFIC REPORT TRAFFIC, the wild life trade monitoring net work, is the leading non-governmental organization working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. TRAFFIC is a strategic alliance of WWF and IUCN. Reprod uction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations con cern ing the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views of the authors expressed in this publication are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of TRAFFIC, WWF or IUCN. Published by TRAFFIC. Southeast Asia Regional Office Unit 3-2, 1st Floor, Jalan SS23/11 Taman SEA, 47400 Petaling Jaya Selangor, Malaysia Telephone : (603) 7880 3940 Fax : (603) 7882 0171 Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. © TRAFFIC 2016. ISBN no: 978-983-3393-49-7 UK Registered Charity No. 1076722. Suggested citation: Gomez, L., Leupen, B T.C., Theng, M., Fernandez, K., and Savage, M. 2016. Illegal Otter Trade : An analysis of seizures in selected Asian countries (1980-2015). TRAFFIC. Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Commission (EC)
    Campion School MUN 2018 Environmental Commission (EC) COMBATING ILLEGAL TRADE IN WILDLIFE Student Officer: Marilia Pavlidou Position: Deputy President President: Maria Patouna International Memorable Challenges Community Experience Skills SPECON: Combating Human/Sec Campion School MUN 2018 Trafficking Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 DEFINITIONS OF KEY TERMS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 TOPIC DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 CAUSES ........................................................................................................................................................................... 11 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 12 MAJOR COUNTRIES & ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED ................................................................................................ 13 ORGANIZATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 COUNTRIES.....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plight of the Commons 17 Years of Wildlife Trafficking in Cambodia
    Biological Conservation 241 (2020) 108379 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Plight of the commons: 17 years of wildlife trafficking in Cambodia T ⁎ Sarah Heinricha, , Joshua V. Rossb, Thomas N.E. Grayc, Steven Deleana, Nick Marxd, Phillip Casseya a School of Biological Sciences and Centre for Applied Conservation Science, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia b School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia c Wildlife Alliance, 1441 Broadway, New York, NY 10013, USA d Wildlife Alliance, 86, St 123, Phnom Penh, Cambodia ABSTRACT Southeast Asia is a hub for wildlife trafficking. Since 2001, the Wildlife Rapid Rescue Team (WRRT), a multi-agency law enforcement unit under the authorityof Cambodian Forestry Administration, has operated in Cambodia to counteract wildlife trafficking. We have analysed confiscation records from the WRRTfor 2001–2018 to determine the compositional trends of trafficked species in Cambodia, and identify any detectable conservation gaps. Confiscations involved95% native species. Over 60% of all confiscated species were either: (i) not listed in CITES; (ii) listed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List; and/or (iii)Commonunder the Cambodian Forestry Law. These common, and usually less appreciated, species in trade may face greater future threats through trafficking and thus require better protection. Birds had the most number of animals confiscated, and songbirds were particularly heavily trafficked. In terms of the number of incidents, reptiles werethemost confiscated Class. A small number of specific reptile species were consistently targeted, and particularly prominent was turtle and tortoise trafficking. Conversely, birds appeared to be trafficked opportunistically.
    [Show full text]