DOCSLIB.ORG

Forestr~{ Research Paper Series

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forestr~{ Research Paper Series Ii IL- I ,.'I .Ill• , FORESTR~{ RESEARCH PAPER SERIES I ..'1 • ~,' Number 3 December 1986 " - , =- ATTITUDE, AWARENESS, AND LEVEL OF PEOPLE'S 'PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY FORESTRY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, NEPAL '. ,,I, Uma Kant Silwal "I. , ,f , ..• HMG-USAID-GTZ -IDRC-FORD-WINROCK PROJECT . "" .. ' ~... - '. , . STRENGTHENIN<3 INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY IN T.HE. FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN NEPAL , ' II';, .. ' -" ' ~, \ ' •011 ... p. FOREWORD :.. This Forestry Research Paper Series is funded through the project, "Strengthening Institutional Capacity in the Food and Agricultural Sector in Nepal," a cooperative effort by'theMiuistry of Agriculture (MOA) of ·His Majesty's Government of Nepal ~nd the Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development. Thi~ project has been made possible by substantial financial support from the u.S. Agency for International Development (USAID),. the German Agency' for Techni~al , Cooperation '(GTZ), the Canadian International Development. Research Centre (IDRC) I and the Ford FOUIldation. One of the most important activities of this project is funding for .. problem oriented research by young professional staff of . agri~ultural agencies of the MOA and related institutions, as well as for concerned individuals in the private s~ctor. In particular, fundingisprovided by the Ford Foundation t6 support research activities related to the human aspects of natural resource management. This res~arch i~carried out with. the active professional assistance of the Winrock staff. I . \ • The purpose of this Forestry Research Paper Series is' to make the I results of the research activities related.. to forestry available to a larger audience, and to acquaint younger staff and studeri~s with advanced methods of research and statistical ~nalysis. It is also hoped that publication of the· Series will' stim~late' dis~ussion among policymakers and thereby assist in the formulation of policies which' are suitable to the management of the natural resource systems upon which the development ofN~pal's ~griculture ~epends. The views expressed in this Forestry Research Paper Series are those of the authors, and do not. necessarily reflect the views of. their' parent institutions. ,. Sarah J. Tisch Michael ·B. Wallace I-:-~--- .' .Seri'es' Edi'tbrs" ," U.' I =' 'j:"" .",', ...:_;c".... I'j\': -',' ~ _.. '. - FORESTRY RESEk~CH PAPER SERIES Number 3 December 1986 -= ATTITUDE, AWARENESS, AND LEVEL OF PEOPLE'S PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY FORESTRY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, NEPAL Uma Kant Silwal ,:. HMG-USAID-GTZ-IDRC-FORD-WINROCK PROJECT - STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY IN THE - FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN NEPAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Literature Review 1 Objectives 2 Limitations 3 METHODOLOGY 3 Selection of Study Area 3 Sampling Procedure 3 Data Collection 3 Background on the Panchayats Surveyed 4 Background on the Households Surveyed 6 - ~ FINDINGS 7 Awareness Regarding the Forest 7 Attitude Towar.ds Community Forestry 9 Participation in Community Forestry Development 10 Helpful Factors for Community Forestry 12 Hindering Factors for Community Forestry 12 CONCLUSION 13 14 REFERENCES 15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIST OF TABLES ~ Table 1. Background on Households Surveyed 6 Table 2. Trees Owned by the Households 7 Table 3. Trees Planted on Private Land in Last Five Years 7 Table 4. Condition of the Forest 8 Table 5. Extent of Forest Change 8 Table 6. Causes of Forest Change 8 Table 7. Disadvantages of Forest Destruction 9 ~ Table 8. Villagers Who Have Seen Community Forestry 9 Table 9. Attitude Toward the Establishment of Community Forest 10 Table 10. Community Forestry Development Activities 11 Table 11. Participation in Community Forestry Development 11 !!' Program Tabla 12. Potantial Participation in the Community Forestry 11 ~ Development Program ATTITUDE, AWARENESS, AND LEVEL OF PEOPLE'S PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY FORESTRY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, NEPAL Uma Kant Silwal* INTRODUCTION Background The reckless depletion of Nepal's forest has grave consequences for the more than 90 percent of the population who live in the rural areas. ~ccording to some estimates, the accessible forest of the hills may disappear within 15 years. This environmental crisis is closely assoc­ iated with the exploitation of forest resources by a rapidly increasing population. Much of the land has been cleared to meet the growing demand for food and livestock. The forest is being denuded faster than it can regenerate. The involvement of the local community in the conservation and development of natural resources remains the only effective solution to -...- the present crisis. Taking this in consideration, the government has introduced radically new legislation in 1978, the Panchayat Forest (PF) Rules, and the Panchayat Protected Forest (PPF) Rules, whose objective is returning ownership of forests to villagers living nearby. One of the most important forestry programs in the past decade is the Community Forestry Development and Training Project (CFDP) financed by World Bank IDA credit. This project is designed to relieve the short­ age of fuelwood and fodder by encouraging rural people to manage the production of these resources at the panchayat level. The project began in 1980, and 400 panchayats in 29 hill districts are now actively participating in reforestation and forest management activities In a short time, the project has been successful in meeting objectives of afforestation, protection, and management of forest through local community participation (HMG/UNDP/FAO, 1982, 1984). Literature Review 7here is a growing awareness among Nepalese hill farmers of the negative effects of deforestation and soil erosion. The degree of this awareness varies considerably from area to area and depends on the extent of deforestation and soil erosion. Desire to improve the situa­ tion is also very strong. In the areas of high awar~ness, the conserva­ tion activities that attract the most interest are planting fruit, fodder, and fuelwood trees, conserving existing forest resources, . and developing better fodder grass (Campbell, 1981). Familiarity with the advantages of the forest, e.g., environmental protection and forest products is prevalent among rural people, especially the literate (New Era, 1980). In participating panchayats, knowledge of the community *Uma Kant Silwal is Assistant Research Officer at the National Commis­ sion on Population~ His Majesty's Government, Kathmandu, Nepal. ,/ forestry program ha& increased significantly. The awareness is consis­ tently highest ~n the central region, with the with the far-west showing comparatively more knowledge than either the eastern, midwestern or western regions (HMG/UNDP/FAO, 1983) • . After the nationalization of community forest laqd in 1957, - community motivation to develop methods of protecting and managing . forest resources was reduced. Despite the good intentions and partial -~ benefits of this act, nationalization resulted in the increased deple­ tion of the forest and negative attitudes toward external enforcement (Campbell, 1981). Villagers mistrusted the intentions of the Forest Department, fearing that if they improved their forests, the government would take them away. This apprehension was based on the effects of the 1962 Forest Nationalization Act (Wormald, 1976). Only after 1978, when the PF and PPF Rules were enacted, did the attitude of communities toward 'owning' and managing their own resources change considerably. The villagers in general are favorably disposed toward establishing private and village woodlots to meet their demand for forest products (New ERA, 1980). Government programs formulated for community forestry development emphasize community participation and involvement. Villagers provide the necessary voluntary labor for any forestry programs launched in their Village. Many of the households have already participated in similar programs by providing voluntary labor and even contributing to the remuneration of forest guards (New ERA, 1980). In principle, the pan­ chayat leaders have agreed that the people in their respective panchayats are ready to contribute voluntary labor (Forestry Services, 1985). However, a study conducted in the Integrated Hill Development Project (IHDP) in th~ Sindhupalchok and Dolakha Districts reveals that the interest in community forestry is less than desired. In general, however, the awareness, attitudes, and willingness of local people to participate in the development of community forestry is sati3factory. Objectives Although there are several studies concerning the conservation and development of natural resources through community participation, very little attention has ~~en paid to the extent and type of participation, the attitudes and awareness created by community forestry' development, and the influencial factors associated with implementation. This study examines these issues and suggests improvements for the Community Forestry Development Program. The objectives of this study are: 1. Compar~ the local awareness of the direct and indirect benefits from the forest in the intervention and control areas. 2. Compare the attitudes and opinions of villagers from two diff­ erent panchayats toward community forestry development. 3. Assess community, participation in the planting, protection, and utilization of the forest. 4. Identify the factors that influence the effective development of the community forest. 2 Limitations 1. This study covers
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Policy for Social and Solidarity Economy a Case Study from Nepal
    Public Policy for Social and Solidarity Economy A Case Study from Nepal Submitted By: Ripu M. Kunwar, Ram P. Acharya, Geeta Khadka, Bishnu H. Poudyal, Sita Shahi, Suman Dhakal, Sunil Pariyar and Bhola Bhattarai Practical Solution Consultancy Nepal Pvt. Ltd (PSPL) Min Bhawan, Kathmandu, Ph: 00977 1 4620373, Email: [email protected] www.psplnepal.org in association with Federation for Community Forestry Users Nepal (FECOFUN), Kathmandu Dalit Alliance for Natural Resources (DANAR), Kathmandu National Forum for Advocacy, Nepal (NAFAN), Kathmandu Submitted to: Center for International Studies and Cooperation (CECI) & UNITERRA, Kathmandu, Nepal February 2013 Public Policy for Social and Solidarity Economy: A Case Study from Nepal TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of GPS Based Digital Profile of Godawari Municipality
    Godawari Municipality Godawari, Lalitpur Final Report Preparation of GPS based Digital Profile of Godawari Municipality Submitted to Godawari Municipality Bajrabarahi, Lalitpur, Nepal Submitted by ArchieSoft Technology Lalitpur Metropolitan City 21, Lalitpur, Nepal Phone: +977 -1-5553000 Email: [email protected] Web: www.archiesoft.com.np 1 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Project Description ............................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Objective of the assignment ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Key Deliverables ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Methodology/ process ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Project Location .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.6 Time line of assignment/ study .......................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2: Godawari Municipality an Introduction ............................................................................... 9 2.1 Background: .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peasantry in Nepal
    92 Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Peasantry in Kathmandu Valley and Its Southern Ridges 4.1 Introduction From ancient times, different societies of caste/ethnicity have been adopting various strategies for ac- quiring a better livelihood in Nepal. Agriculture was, and is, the main strategy. The predominant form of agriculture practised throughout the hilly area of the Nepal is crop farming, livestock and forestry at the subsistence level. Kathmandu valley including Lalitpur district is no exception. The making of handicrafts used to be the secondary occupation in the urban areas of the district. People in the montane and the rural part of the district was more dependent upon the forest resources for subsidiary income. Cutting firewood, making khuwa (solidified concentrated milk cream) and selling them in the cities was also a part of the livelihood for the peasants in rural areas. However, since the past few decades peasants/rural households who depended on subsistence farming have faced greater hardships in earning their livelihoods from farming alone due to rapid population growth and degradation of the natural resource base; mainly land and forest. As a result, they have to look for other alternatives to make living. With the development of local markets and road network, people started to give more emphasis to various nonfarm works as their secondary occupation that would not only support farming but also generate subsidiary cash income. Thus, undertaking nonfarm work has become a main strategy for a better livelihood in these regions. With the introduction of dairy farming along with credit and marketing support under the dairy development policy of the government, small scale peasant dairy farming has flourished in these montane regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tables Table 1.3.2 Typical Geological Sections
    Tables Table 1.3.2 Typical Geological Sections - T 1 - Table 2.3.3 Actual ID No. List of Municipal Wards and VDC Sr. No. ID-No. District Name Sr. No. ID-No. District Name Sr. No. ID-No. District Name 1 11011 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.1 73 10191 Kathmandu Gagalphedi 145 20131 Lalitpur Harisiddhi 2 11021 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.2 74 10201 Kathmandu Gokarneshwar 146 20141 Lalitpur Imadol 3 11031 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.3 75 10211 Kathmandu Goldhunga 147 20151 Lalitpur Jharuwarasi 4 11041 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.4 76 10221 Kathmandu Gongabu 148 20161 Lalitpur Khokana 5 11051 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.5 77 10231 Kathmandu Gothatar 149 20171 Lalitpur Lamatar 6 11061 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.6 78 10241 Kathmandu Ichankhu Narayan 150 20181 Lalitpur Lele 7 11071 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.7 79 10251 Kathmandu Indrayani 151 20191 Lalitpur Lubhu 8 11081 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.8 80 10261 Kathmandu Jhor Mahakal 152 20201 Lalitpur Nallu 9 11091 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.9 81 10271 Kathmandu Jitpurphedi 153 20211 Lalitpur Sainbu 10 11101 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.10 82 10281 Kathmandu Jorpati 154 20221 Lalitpur Siddhipur 11 11111 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.11 83 10291 Kathmandu Kabresthali 155 20231 Lalitpur Sunakothi 12 11121 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.12 84 10301 Kathmandu Kapan 156 20241 Lalitpur Thaiba 13 11131 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.13 85 10311 Kathmandu Khadka Bhadrakali 157 20251 Lalitpur Thecho 14 11141 Kathmandu Kathmandu Ward No.14 86 10321 Kathmandu Lapsephedi 158 20261 Lalitpur Tikathali 15 11151 Kathmandu
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Minutes Template
    HRRP District Coordination Meeting Minutes Meeting Purpose: General Coordination Meeting Meeting Date: 19/11/2018 (19 November 2018) Meeting Time: 11:30 AM Meeting Location: NRA-GMaLI office, Manbhawan, Lalitpur Meeting Facilitator: Mr. Prakash Pokhrel, DLPIU NRA GMaLI Lalitpur Minutes Taken By: Ms. Ambika Amatya, District Coordinator, Kathmandu Valley HRRP Team Summary of Total: 15 Female: 7 Male: 8 participants: Discussion: (Items/Knowledge Shared) Agendas: Agendas: • Welcome and sharing of objective • Reconstruction updates from POs • Discussion on reconstruction issues/challenges • AOB Agenda 1 • Welcome and sharing of objective The general coordination meeting of DLPIU NRA-GMaLI, Lalitpur was held on 19th November 2018 at NRA-GMaLI Office, Lalitpur. The coordination meeting was chaired by Mr. Bir Bahadur Rawal, Chief, DLPIU NRA- GMaLI Lalitpur in the presence of POs, staff members of EHRP/DLPIU NRA GMaLI Lalitpur, DLPIU-Building and HRRP. The main objective of the meeting was to discuss on reconstruction status and updates of past two months from POs. Agenda 2 Reconstruction updates from POs • Solve Nepal Solve Nepal with the support of CECI Nepal has been implementing Punarnirman Project (Livelihood promotion for earthquake affected population in Nepal) in Ward no. 1, Bukhel, Mahankal Rural Municipality; Ward no. 2 Sankhu, Konjosyom Rural Municipality and Ward no. 3, Bhattedanda, Bagmati Rural Municipality. Project period is from March 2017 – 2019. Some of the activities of Solve Nepal includes animal health camp, compost manure preparation training, basic training on poultry farming and also conducted light search and rescue training. Likewise, Solve Nepal provided light search and rescue equipment support placed at Bhattedanda Ward office, Bhattedanda Cooperative Office, Sankhu Ward Office and Bukhel Ward Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • My Journey in the Valley of Kathmandu, Nepal an Account of My 2013 Borlaug-Ruan Internship
    THE WORLD FOOD PRIZE My Journey in the Valley of Kathmandu, Nepal An account of my 2013 Borlaug-Ruan Internship By: Valerie Gamao (Live Oak, Texas) June 14 - August 14, 2013 Table of Contents Pages Acknowledgements 2 Background Information: ICIMOD 3 Part I: My Research 4-32 Introduction 4-6 Data Collection 6 Sample Size and Surveyed Areas Methodology Questionnaire Development Findings (Below are just a sample of the entire findings presented in this paper) 7-32 Overview of Households Surveyed in the Lalitpur Area 7 KUKL: Status of Pipeline Supply to Households 9 Groundwater: Status of Groundwater Extraction and Use by Households 12 Water Tankers: Market Relationship Status Between Water Tankers 16 and Households Springs: Status of Dhunge dharas and its Use by Households 18 Comparing Sources Across Quanity and Quality Problems 21 Households and their Perception of the Quantity of Water Available 21 Water Storage Tanks as a Coping Mechanism for Water Shortage 22 Households and their Perception of the Quality of the Water Available 23 The Level of Effect of Water Scarcity and Quality Issues to Households 25 Possible Determinants to Water Scarcity 27-28 Rainwater Harvesting 29-31 Part II. How My Research Tackles Food Insecurity 33 Part III. Personal Journey 34-35 Pictures 36 References 37-38 1 Acknowledgements My journey in Nepal last summer would not have been possible without the contribution and belief of key individuals and institutions to today’s youth. First off, I would like to thank the World Food Prize Foundation (WFP) for having given me opportunities that I would have never imagined starting with my participation in the Global Youth Institute to my recent Borlaug-Ruan internship.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Readiness for Self-Managed School
    1 COMMUNITY READINESS FOR SELF-MANAGED SCHOOL CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Background of the Study The history of formal school education in Nepal begins with the establishment of Durbar School in 1853, mainly for educating children of ruling elites. Children of general public had no access to this school. In this regard, Ministry of Education [MoE] (2003) stated: “Modern education began in Nepal with the establishment of first school in 1853. However, this school was only for the members of the ruling families and their courtiers. Schooling for the general people began only after 1951 when a popular movement ended an autocratic family regime and initiated a democratic system” (p. 2). Khati (2003) argued that the Rana regime of 104 years were completely against any form of educational development, the opinion behind their motives of suppressing educational development was that the education would awaken the people and in turn weaken their power. For Khati, educations during Rana Regime were only for the chosen few of their own Rana circle and not as a right of everybody as the masses of Nepalese people were kept uneducated and illiterate. In those days, general public were deprived of education and were forced to engage in sustenance agricultural activities. However, aspirations of some people to educate their children were met to some extent by sending their children in ‘Patha sala’, ‘Gumba’ and ‘Bihar’ organized by community as guthi, caste group and religion groups. The 2 education facility that they rendered was poor in quality, and education, therefore, was also inaccessible to many. After the inception of democracy in 1951, it was realised that education system should be enhanced, where community took the first step in organizing the school for their children, which was referred as the community managed school.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Organizations Per Cluster Gorkha Rasuwa Health 26
    NEPAL: Lalitpur - Operational Presence Map (as of 30 Jun 2015) As of 30 June 2015, 72 organizations are reported to be working in Lalitpur district Number of organizations per cluster Health WASH NUMBER OF ORGANI Shelter Protection Protection Education Nutrition 10 6 10 1 5 ZATIONS PER VDC 26 Gorkha No. of Org Health No data Dhading Rasuwa 1 Nuwakot Makawanpur Shelter 2 3 - 4 Sindhupalchok 5 - 6 INDIA CHINA Kabhrepalanchok No. of Org Dolakha Sindhuli Ramechhap Education No data No. of Org 1 - 2 Okhaldunga WASH 3 4 - 5 No data 6 - 26 1 Creation date: Glide number: Sources: 2 - 3 The boundaries and names shown and the desi 4 - 7 8 - 10 No. of Org 10 July 2015 EQ-2015-000048-NPL Cluster reporting No data No. of Org 1 Nutrition 2 gnations used on this map do not imply offici No data 3 4 1 2 -4 5 - 7 8 - 9 al endorsement or acceptance by the Uni No. of Org Feedback: No data [email protected] www.humanitarianresponse.info 1 ted Nations. 2 3 4 Lalitpur District List of organizations by VDC and cluster Health Protection Shelter and NFI WASH Nutrition EDUCATION VDC name JSI,TLM,UNICEF,WHO The Himalayan Innovative Society Cesvi,LWF FCA Asrang Badikhel UNICEF,WHO AA GNI,HDRVG GNI,OXFAM,UNICEF,Wateraid SDPC GNI Bhardeu JSI,UNICEF,WHO UNFPA HDRVG,LWF,MCC UNICEF SDPC Bhattedanda JSI,TLM,UNICEF,WHO HDRVG,LWF,SDC SDC,UNICEF SDPC RBF Bisangkhunarayan UNICEF IMC,OXFAM,UNICEF SDPC GNI, Restless Bukhel JSI,UNICEF,WHO UNFPA,Women's Rehabilitation Center AKF,HDRVG UNICEF SDPC Restless JSI,UNICEF,UNFPA,WHO CGNN,CWISH,Kopila Nepal ,START Cesvi,HAI,Peace
    [Show full text]
  • Download 5.21 MB
    Initial Environmental Examination Thaiba - Godamchaur Road Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Sub-project June 2017 NEP: Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project Prepared by District Coordination Committee (Lalitpur)- Central Level Project Implementation Unit – Ministry of Federals Affairs and Local Development for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. The views expressed herein are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s members, Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................. v 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Name and Address of the Proponent .......................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Earthquake - 2072, Baishakh) District: LALITPUR
    Disaster Affected Locations (Earthquake - 2072, Baishakh) District: LALITPUR 85°20'E DHADING Ü Locaton Map ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Te!ku Dobhan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Kupandol ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Sanepa ! ! Jhamsik! hel ! ! ! P !Harihar Bhawan ! P !Chakupat ! ! ! ! Shankha! mulghat ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Patan Dhoka ! Kumb! heshwar ! !Pulchok ! ! ! ! ! ! P !Basnetgaun KATHMANDU P ! BHAKTAPUR !Mangal B!ajar Kwako ! ! ! !Zoological Garden P Patan Darbar !Balkumari ! ! ! ! P !Kumaripati !Ekantakuna ! ! ! ! ! P ! !Thaina ! N !Bagdol ! ' ! ! 0 !Gorkhu S! undhara ! !Patan Hospital 4 ! ! ° ! ! ! Imadol 7 N !Lagankhel !Nakhu ' 2 ! 0 ! ! P Dharmeshwa!r ! ! !Nakhu Bajar ! 4 Phidol ! Gwarko ! ° ! ! 7 ! 2 !Kusanti ! ! !Bistagaun Tik! athali ! P !Sarkidhik ! P P ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Satdobato P Paudelgaun !Sainbu Bhanjyang !Tikhidol !Datidol ! ! !Ochu ! ! !Khadkagaun ! LALITPUR SUB-METROPOLITAN CITY ! ! !Talchhikhel !Tallogaun ! P !Thaikot Khadka! tol ! ! !Khumaltar ! !Nakhodol ! !Kumargaun !Tutupani !Bhainsepati ! P ! ! P ! ! ! ! Sitapakha ! !Sanagaun (Siddhipur) !Narkate ! !Magargaun !Nakhipot ! ! P ! !Nakhudol ChaPk! amakal ! P P !Chasidol ! P !Borcha ! P P ! ! P ! P P !Lubhu ! P !Sano Khokana !Loyachok P ! ! Baniyagaun PP P ! PP P !Orpach P P P !Lubhu P PP ! !Khadkagaun ! ! Saphaltol !Sashambhu !Dholahiti ! !Bisnudol ! !Okhthali P P PP !Chokhel !Dhapakhel !Thulaghar ! ! ! ! Harisiddhi ! ! !Wakhat !Barko !Jainkhel P ! !Chhayasikot P ! !Simako ! P ! ! !Khokana MAHALAXMI MUNICIPALITY PP ! ! P ! ! ! Charghare ! Simthali Jyakata Dharachaur
    [Show full text]
  • Saath-Saath Project
    Saath-Saath Project Saath-Saath Project THIRD ANNUAL REPORT August 2013 – July 2014 September 2014 0 Submitted by Saath-Saath Project Gopal Bhawan, Anamika Galli Baluwatar – 4, Kathmandu Nepal T: +977-1-4437173 F: +977-1-4417475 E: [email protected] FHI 360 Nepal USAID Cooperative Agreement # AID-367-A-11-00005 USAID/Nepal Country Assistance Objective Intermediate Result 1 & 4 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Program Management ........................................................................................................................... 6 III. Technical Program Elements (Program by Outputs) .............................................................................. 6 Outcome 1: Decreased HIV prevalence among selected MARPs ...................................................................... 6 Outcome 2: Increased use of Family Planning (FP) services among MARPs ................................................... 9 Outcome 3: Increased GON capacity to plan, commission and use SI ............................................................ 14 Outcome
    [Show full text]