DOCSLIB.ORG

Precepts in Japanese Pure Land Buddhism the Jōdoshū

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Precepts in Japanese Pure Land Buddhism the Jōdoshū Precepts in Japanese Pure Land Buddhism The Jōdoshū James C. Dobbins Precepts, supposedly the common thread drawing together the Buddhist world, have had a problematic and controversial place in Japanese Buddhism.* It is no secret that Japanese have long debated their content, function, and ne- cessity, and that the value ascribed to them in Japan has differed in important ways from their value in other Buddhist countries. In fact, in the eyes of other countries, there may be some question as to whether Japanese follow a legiti- mate version of the precepts and whether their clergy are properly ordained. Japan’s discomfort regarding the precepts has existed from early in its history, and some of its prominent forms of Buddhism emerged with a distinct sense of ambivalence toward them. The Pure Land tradition, for one, exemplifies Japan’s attraction-avoidance response to the precepts. Pure Land Buddhism has a long and complex history in Japan, but the par- ticular school to be examined here is the Jōdoshū 浄土宗, or Pure Land school, which claims the eminent master Hōnen 法然 (Genkū 源空; 1133–1212) as its founder. To be more exact, the school is the Chinzei 鎭西 branch of the Jōdoshū, which is traceable to Hōnen’s disciple Benchō 辨長 (1162–1238) and was further developed by such leaders as Ryōchū 良忠 (1199–1287) and Shōgei 聖冏 (1341– 1420). This is in contrast to the Seizan 西山 branch of the Jōdoshū, descended from the close disciple of Hōnen named Shōkū 證空 (1177–1247). The Chinzei branch should also be distinguished from two other Pure Land groups, which likewise emerged in the wake of Hōnens pioneering efforts: the Shinshū 眞宗 (True School), traceable to Shinran 親鸞 (1173–1263); and the Jishū 時宗 (Time School), stemming from Ippen 一遍 (1239–1289). All of these took embryonic form in the Kamakura 鎌倉 period (1185–1333) and gradually assumed a sepa- rate identity from the medieval period’s prevailing forms of Buddhism. Source: Dobbins, James C., “Precepts in Japanese Pure Land Buddhism: The Jōdoshū,” in William M. Bodiford (ed.), Going Forth: Visions of Buddhist Vinaya, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 236–254. * I would like to thank Professor Fukuhara Ryūzen 福原隆善 of Bukkyō 佛教 University in Kyoto and the Venerable Kondō Tesshō 近藤徹称, head resident of the Shōrin’an 照臨庵 in Kyoto, for meeting with me during the preparation of this essay to discuss the precepts in the Jōdoshū. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004401518_029 696 Dobbins The Chinzei branch of the Jōdoshū originated somewhat on the periph- ery of Japan’s Buddhist world. It began in Kyūshū 九州, at the western end of Japan, and later expanded eastward into the Kantō 關東 region, where it came to be based particularly at Kōmyōji 光明寺 Temple in Kamakura. In the fifteenth century it grew increasingly prominent and influential when it took over exclusive leadership of Chion’in 知恩院 Temple in Kyoto, the location of Hōnen’s grave-site chapel. The branch’s fortunes were boosted considerably in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries when it received special patronage from the great unifier of Japan, Tokugawa Ieyasu 徳川家康 (1542–1616), and subsequently from his shogunate government. Today, the Chinzei Jōdoshū is the second largest Pure Land denomination in Japan after the two main branches of Shinran’s Shinshū. 1 Antecedents of Jōdoshū Precepts All of the aforementioned Pure Land groups arose in Japan after the Buddhist precepts had become an integral part of the established religious order. The precepts that the Jōdoshū adopted were not those of the Four Part Vinaya, which temples in the old capital of Nara upheld, but the Mahāyāna (or bod- hisattva) precepts, also known as the Perfect Sudden Precepts (endon kai 圓 頓戒), which Saichō 最澄 (767–822) instituted for ordinations in the Tendai 天 台 school (Groner 2000, 107–194). Ample evidence suggests that Saichō’s was not a smooth and problem-free system. Many controversies emerged even in Tendai over the precepts’ meaning and applicability (Groner 1990a, 251–290). But because Tendai was such an influential form of Buddhism in Japan, its ordination system using the bodhisattva precepts was widely accepted, even though other Buddhist countries did not use them in that way. Hōnen and most of his disciples entered the clergy under the Tendai system. Hence, when the Jōdoshū speaks of the precepts, it is referring to the bodhisattva precepts specifically. It inherited most of the associations and significances, as well as the ambivalences, that Tendai had regarding them. At the time the Jōdoshū appeared on the scene, Japanese Buddhism was un- dergoing a crisis over the precepts. The problem was not whether one should follow the Four Part Vinaya or the bodhisattva precepts, as Saichō had argued. Rather, it was whether any precepts at all should be recognized. There emerged a widespread sense in Japan that the clergy was in a state of moral decay. The types of actions most commonly decried were eating meat, consuming liquor, and indulging in sexual activity and even marriage—all violations of the pre- cepts. Whether the clergy were actually worse than in previous periods or .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pictures of an Island Kingdom Depictions of Ryūkyū in Early Modern Japan
    PICTURES OF AN ISLAND KINGDOM DEPICTIONS OF RYŪKYŪ IN EARLY MODERN JAPAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ART HISTORY MAY 2012 By Travis Seifman Thesis Committee: John Szostak, Chairperson Kate Lingley Paul Lavy Gregory Smits Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter I: Handscroll Paintings as Visual Record………………………………. 18 Chapter II: Illustrated Books and Popular Discourse…………………………. 33 Chapter III: Hokusai Ryūkyū Hakkei: A Case Study……………………………. 55 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………. 78 Appendix: Figures …………………………………………………………………………… 81 Works Cited ……………………………………………………………………………………. 106 ii Abstract This paper seeks to uncover early modern Japanese understandings of the Ryūkyū Kingdom through examination of popular publications, including illustrated books and woodblock prints, as well as handscroll paintings depicting Ryukyuan embassy processions within Japan. The objects examined include one such handscroll painting, several illustrated books from the Sakamaki-Hawley Collection, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Library, and Hokusai Ryūkyū Hakkei, an 1832 series of eight landscape prints depicting sites in Okinawa. Drawing upon previous scholarship on the role of popular publishing in forming conceptions of “Japan” or of “national identity” at this time, a media discourse approach is employed to argue that such publications can serve as reliable indicators of understandings
    [Show full text]
  • Powerful Warriors and Influential Clergy Interaction and Conflict Between the Kamakura Bakufu and Religious Institutions
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAllllBRARI Powerful Warriors and Influential Clergy Interaction and Conflict between the Kamakura Bakufu and Religious Institutions A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HISTORY MAY 2003 By Roy Ron Dissertation Committee: H. Paul Varley, Chairperson George J. Tanabe, Jr. Edward Davis Sharon A. Minichiello Robert Huey ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a doctoral dissertation is quite an endeavor. What makes this endeavor possible is advice and support we get from teachers, friends, and family. The five members of my doctoral committee deserve many thanks for their patience and support. Special thanks go to Professor George Tanabe for stimulating discussions on Kamakura Buddhism, and at times, on human nature. But as every doctoral candidate knows, it is the doctoral advisor who is most influential. In that respect, I was truly fortunate to have Professor Paul Varley as my advisor. His sharp scholarly criticism was wonderfully balanced by his kindness and continuous support. I can only wish others have such an advisor. Professors Fred Notehelfer and Will Bodiford at UCLA, and Jeffrey Mass at Stanford, greatly influenced my development as a scholar. Professor Mass, who first introduced me to the complex world of medieval documents and Kamakura institutions, continued to encourage me until shortly before his untimely death. I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to them. In Japan, I would like to extend my appreciation and gratitude to Professors Imai Masaharu and Hayashi Yuzuru for their time, patience, and most valuable guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • On Recent Readings of Shinran
    On Recent Readings of Shinran DENNIS HIROTA 1. Common Readings of Shinran: A Paradigm of Bifurcation Shinran’s thought has received a sparseness of attention in the West quite out of proportion to the originality of his achievement and the place of his Shin movement in Japanese society and in the history of Buddhist tradition as a whole.1 There is widespread agreement among most commentators that the chief reason for this imbalance in modem Western Buddhist studies, even given the early marginalization of Japanese Buddhist traditions as being far removed from the doctrines and practices of ‘original’ Buddhism, lies in the close resemblance of fundamental Shin symbols and concepts to those of Protestant Christianity. Jan van Bragt, a Catholic priest with long experience in Japan, characterizes the common attitude: [T]he West is mainly interested in Buddhism as its antipode, part­ ly in distrust of its own religious tradition. It is therefore most attracted to these forms of Buddhism wherein that antipodal char­ acter appears most clearly—Theravada, Zen, Tibetan Buddhism. The Pure Land school, on the other hand, is perceived as very close to Christianity and far removed from the mainstream of Buddhism.2 While this general account of the interests of many Western Buddhist schol­ ars may be accurate, I believe that further analysis of the dominant views of Shin may be useful, for even in a case like van Bragt’s, awareness of the fun­ damental predisposition that has colored Western attitudes toward Japanese 1 Regarding Western interpretations of Shin tradition, see Amstutz 1997. 2 Bragt 1993, p.
    [Show full text]
  • "Shinran's Rejection of Deathbed Rites" (2012)
    pear directly as quotations in Shinran.'s writings, but surely his intent is that they be preserved and read. Shinran's Rejection of Deathbed Rites 6) I follow the reading of Imai Masaharu, who has pointed out that the verb forms employed by Eshinni indicate that she directly witnessed these encounters and sug­ , gests that she herself had already been a member of H6nen's following at the time. See Imai Masaharu. Shim-an to Eshinni. (Kyoto: ]ish6 Shuppan, 2004). Jacqueline I. Stone 7) In Adriaan T. Peperzak, Simon Critchley, and Robert Bernascont eds., Emmanuel · Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings, (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana Uni­ versity Press.l996), p. 104. In 1259 and 1260. famine and disease devastated Japan's eastern provinces. 8) There is a slight difference between Shinran's quotation and the most widespread Shinran (1173-1262)-later revered as the founder of Jodo ShinshU. or the version of H6nen's text, representing perhaps some authorial variation in choice True Pure Land sect-wrote to his follower Joshin-bo expressing sorrow among synonyms. The common text has "foremost'' (saki, )'G) and Shinran's copy that so many people, old and young, had died. Then he added, "Personally, I has ~fundamental" (hon, /.j.l:). Although basically indistingujshable in meaning. Shin­ attach no significance to the manner of one's death, good or bad. Those in ran's hon is appropriate to the central meaning he emphasizes in HOnen's expres­ whom faith is established have no doubts; therefore they dwell in the com­ sion. pany of those certain to be born in the Pure Land (shajoju).
    [Show full text]
  • Translations
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE TRANSLATIONS The Record of Ippen: Letters Translated with an Introduction by Dennis Hirota Introduction Only ten of Ippen’s letters survive, but as concise statements of his nembutsu teaching, they form probably the best introduction to his Record as a whole.* 1 As for the man himself, although he instructed that “the absence of any monu­ ment be [his] monument,” ten years after his death a biography in word and picture was made that has come down as one of the finest ofJapanese picture scrolls, remarkable for its beauty as well as its apparent accuracy in depicting the details of Ippen’s life and the landscape and fixtures of his times. The Ippen Hijiri-e —with a text by Ippen’s brother2 and disciple, Shdkai is the major source for information about Ippen, and I will quote here from several early sections which present the immediate background of the formation of his teaching. Ippen (1239-69) was bom to an influential family in Iyo province on Shikoku, but when he was ten his mother died and his father had him enter the Buddhist priesthood. In 1251 he went to Dazaifu in Kyushu to study under Sh&tatsu 1 Ippen Shown Goroku —compiled by the 52nd head of the Ji school, Ikkai —Ml, in 1756 (?), edited by the Seizan scholar-monk Shunpfi and published in j8tt. (Two earlier printings were destroyed by fire.) The letters are translated as given in this text, with numbers added. Other sections of the Goroku will appear in future issues of the Easism Buddhist.
    [Show full text]
  • Kōsai and the Paradox of Ichinengi: Be Careful of What You Preach
    Kōsai and the Paradox of Ichinengi: Be Careful of What You Preach Mark Blum State University of New York, Albany WHAT IS THE PSYCHOLOGICAL experience of Pure Land Buddhism that supposedly changed so radically in the Kamakura period with the anagogic insight brought to the community by Hōnen that produced a message so powerful, so inspiring, for so many? This is one of great enigmas of Japa- nese Buddhism, and indeed of all Buddhist history. Unfortunately, there are enormous text-critical problems associated with nearly all the writings in the Hōnen corpus, as well as the voluminous biographical material about him and his movement written in the century following his death, and this situation makes our understanding of Hōnen exceedingly precarious. Arguably equally influential, however, are the many extant writings from the generation of Pure Land religious leaders who emerged from Hōnen’s corps of authoritative disciples. Written by his most intimate students, all endeavor to “clarify” Hōnen’s doctrines while describing their own religious perspectives. These works not only afford first-hand insight into Hōnen’s message, but as creative voices in their own right are testimony to the lively discourse of this age, and in addressing such topics as the relationship between praxis and realization, speak to universal religious concerns. This paper examines Kōsai’s thought and his views on the meaning of nenbutsu. Kōsai was one of the direct disciples who spent considerable time with Hōnen. His interpretative standpoint, usually referred to as ichinengi (一念 義), has been problematic for Jōdoshū, Jōdoshinshū, and the government authorities since the Kamakura period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Buddhist 1978-1987
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk THE EASTERN BUDDHIST NEW SERIES NEW SERIES INDEX 1978-1987 THE EASTERN BUDDHIST SOCIETY Table of Contents Vol. XI No. 1 May 1978 ARTICLES Ztn hyakudat “One Hundred Zen Topic*’* (I), .Suruh' DaiseU....................................................... 1 The Problem of Time in Shinran, Nuhiiam Knji ........................................................................... 13 From the Lotus Sutra to the Sutra of Eternal Life: Reflections on the Process of Deliverance in Shinran. Ochd Enichi.................................................................................................................... rj The Meaning of Hinayina in Northern Ch’an, Robert Zeuschner.................................................. 37 TRANSLATIONS The Record of Ippen: Letters. Translated by Dennis Hirota...................................................... 50 Dogen’s Hokyo-ks (II). Translated by Norman Waddell................................................................ 66 VIEWS AND REVIEWS Shinran’s Way in the Modern World, Alfred Bloom........................................................................ 85 Sea Change: An Emerging Image of the Human, Frederick Franck.............................................. 96 BOOK REVIEWS The Holy Teaching of Vimalakini- A Mahayana Scripture. Translated by Robert A. F. Thurman; and The Teaching of Vunalakirti. By Etienne Lamotte (Nagao Gadjsn)................................... 109 Pun Land Buddhist Painting. Byjoji Okazaki (Harold Stewart)......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gutoku Shinran”
    Nishida’s “ Gutoku Shinran” Dennis Hirota Introduction utoku shinran belongs to the earliest period of Nishida’s publica­ tions. It originally appeared in April, 1911, several months after A Study ofG Good {Zen no Kenkyti), in a book produced in observance of the six hun­ dred fiftieth anniversary of the death of Shinran (1173-1263). The volume was titled Views of the Founder and included articles by NanjO Bun’yti, Suzuki Daisetz, and a number of other scholars associated with the Tokyo and Kyoto imperial universities.1 Nishida was forty years old at the time. The significance of the essay is concisely indicated in a prefatory note in a selection of Nishida’s works edited by Nishitani Keiji: “ This article already reveals a penetrating insight into the nature of religion, and at the same time clearly expresses, alongside the deep interest in Zen that we see in his diaries, Nishida’s great esteem for Shinran, which he maintained undiminished to the end of his life.’’2 As pointed out here, “Gutoku Shinran” retains importance for its expression of Nishida’s understanding both of the nature of religion and of Shinran’s thought. On the one hand, in viewing Shinran within the broad context of his understanding of religion, Nishida forcefully illuminates the religious transformation that lies at the heart of Shinran’s path. In this way, he provides insight into a side of Shinran’s thought that has received little emphasis in traditional Shin scholastic study. On the other hand, in relation to the corpus of Nishida’s writings, the essay provides evidence of Nishida’s lifelong interest in Shinran’s thought and the importance of Shinran to his philosophy of religion.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Separation of Gods and Buddhas” at Omiwa Shrine in Meiji Japan
    Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 1995 22/1-2 The “Separation of Gods and Buddhas” at Omiwa Shrine in Meiji Japan Klaus A ntoni The development of Shinto during the Meiji period constitutes one of the most fascinating phenomena of modern Japanese history, especially in view of the far-reaching effect that the State Shinto of the late Meiji period had on many aspects of Japanese life. But although the nature of Meiji- period Shinto has been widely researched, far less attention has been direct­ ed to the genesis of the movement as an intellectual, political, and reli­ gious force. Since many of the keys for understanding the later development of State Shinto are found in the years of the Meiji Restoration, research on this period——which could be called the shinbutsu bunri (separation of gods and Buddhas) period— is essential if we are to comprehend the fu ll significance of the Shinto movement. The term shinbutsu bunri refers to the separation of Shinto and Buddhism (actually the expulsion of Buddhism from syncretic Shinto- Buddhist sanctuaries) that occurred from the spring of 1868. This separa­ tion was one of the central events in the formation of modern Japanese Shinto. The present article analyzes the events of the shinbutsu bunri period at one of Japan’s most important shrines, Omiwa Jinja in Nara Prefecture. The events connected with this shrine from 1868 to the early 1870s provide an interesting reflection of what happened to religious insti­ tutions throughout Japan during that period. The Nara Basin is sure to impress anyone traveling through its thickly settled plains as a region of deep historic significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Iv Beyond the Convent Walls: the Local and Japan
    Beyond the Convent Walls: The Local and Japan-wide Activities of Daihongan’s Nuns in the Early Modern Period (c. 1550–1868) by Matthew Steven Mitchell Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date: _______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Richard M. Jaffe, Supervisor ___________________________ Barbara R. Ambros ___________________________ Daniel Botsman ___________________________ Hwansoo Kim ___________________________ David Morgan Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 i v ABSTRACT Beyond the Convent Walls: The Local and Japan-wide Activities of Daihongan’s Nuns in the Early Modern Period (c. 1550–1868) by Matthew Steven Mitchell Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date: _______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Richard M. Jaffe, Supervisor ___________________________ Barbara Ambros ___________________________ Daniel Botsman ___________________________ Hwansoo Kim ___________________________ David Morgan An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Copyright by Matthew Steven Mitchell 2016 Abstract This dissertation examines the social and financial activities of Buddhist nuns to demonstrate how and why they deployed Buddhist doctrines, rituals, legends, and material culture to
    [Show full text]
  • "Pure Land: History, Tradition, and Practice" and "When You Greet Me I Bow: Notes and Reflections from a Life in Zen"
    H-Buddhism NEW BOOKS> "Pure Land: History, Tradition, and Practice" and "When You Greet Me I Bow: Notes and Reflections from a Life in Zen" Discussion published by Nikko Odiseos on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Dear Friends, Before presenting these two new books, I wanted to share that we recently partnered with the American Theological Library Association to email their members to highlight some recent releases and key collections that should be in any higher-ed library. As this may well be of interest to many on this list, you can view the notice here: http://shmb.la/atla. I am pleased to share two books released this Tuesday, May 18th. 1. Pure Land: History, Tradition, and Practice by Charles B. Jones (Catholic University of America) Rather than the standard description, I am sharing Kenneth Tanaka's overview: "This is the first book in English that covers the essential elements of the overall development of Pure Land Buddhism—from India to its spread in China and East Asia. This impressive work by Professor Jones is based on the latest scholarship but is presented to be accessible to ordinary readers who are not specialists. Pure Land dispels the stereotypical image of Pure Land Buddhism as being 'merely' a devotional and popular belief. Instead, we learn that its beginnings are reflected in the Sanskrit texts and were nurtured through the two millennia of orthodox tradition practiced by not only laypersons but also by monastics. The Pure Land tradition probably offers the most egalitarian path to enlightenment, which partly accounts for its ubiquitous presence throughout the Mahayana Buddhist world.
    [Show full text]
  • 11Reviews.Pdf
    Book Review NO ABODE: The Record of Ippen Translated with an Introduction and Notes by Dennis Hirota, Kyoto, Ryukoku University Translation Center and the Institute of Buddhist Studies, 1986. Approximately 251 pp. paper, $15.00. n the world of Buddhism, the spirit of the awakening is woven with references to relevant I Buddha is often confused with the structure of Buddhist view and doctrines. These references the institution. There are, however, individuals help the reader to better understand how Ippen' s who have broken out of the confinement of insti­ view fit into Buddhism. The explanations and tutional structures. Ippen was such a person. In his descriptions are clear and pertinent to the material book, NO ABODE: The Record of Ippen, Dennis being presented. The author's broad understanding Hirota, presents a clear view of the life and of Buddhism provides fum ground from which to perceptions of a remarkable religious person. view and examine Ippen. There are three partS which make up the text As if to reflect the spirit of Ippen, Hirota of NO ABODE: the introduction, the translation, writes with a style that is not burdened with jargon and the annotations to the translation. In the or unsubstantiated assumptions. He is readable and introduction, Hirota puts into perspective the informative. development of Ippen's religious views. Using The second part of the book is a translation significant events in his life we are led through based on the Record ofIppen. Hirota explains in A Ippen's deepening religious understanding. In one Note on the Text,"I have generally followed the such event Ippen was confronted with the validity text and the order of the material in RecoJ'd of of his practice of passing out slips of paper printed /ppen (Ippen SOOnin Goroku), an Edo-period com­ with the Name of Amida Buddha.
    [Show full text]