DOCSLIB.ORG

Clay Shaw Trial 34

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clay Shaw Trial 34 RE DUCED AT TEE NATIONAL Rcfcrezce cc;y, JF~ C-l k CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISiANA * * * * * * * * * l + l STATE OF LOUISIANA * * 198-059 versus * 14:26 (30) * SECTION "Cm CLAY L. SHAW l * *********** EXCERPT FROM THE PROCEEDINGS OF TUESDAY MORNING, FEBRUARY 25, 1969 BEFORE: I THE HONORABLE EIlWARD A. HAGGEWY, JR., . JUDGE, SECTION "C" Dietrich & Pickett, Inc. swptkfb 333 ST. CHARLES AVENUE, SUITE 1221 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130- 522-3111 ICC- -. Ir R Rcfctexe CC;~, jpx csl ._ 1 --e-eINDEX f;f 2 mmss DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS 3 DEAN A. ANDREWS, JR. 7 17 4 6 ---EXHIBITS -em-- 7 EXHIBIT NO. IDENTIFIED OFFERED RECEIVED 8 S-67 2 2 9 -71 2 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2s Refcreace cc;y, JF~ csl I_ ?h. Wl 1 AFTER THE RECESS: 2 i : 2 MR. OSER: 3 At this time, Your Honor, the State wishes 4 to offer, introduce and file into 5 evidence that which has previously 6 been marked for purposes of identi- 7 fication "S-67" and "-71," the two 8 reports signed by Colonel Finck. 9 MR. DYMOND: 10 I call Mr. Dean Andrews, please. 11 THE COURT: 12 Mr. Zelden, have a seat like everybody 13 else. 14 MR. ALCOCK: I5 May we approach the bench? 16 THE COURT: 17 Yes, you certainly may. 18 (Discussion off the recor?,) 19 THE COURT: ‘0 Sheriff, take the Jury in my chambers for 2: a few moments. 22 (Whereupon, the Jury was removed.) 23 MR. ALCOCK: 24 Your Honor, I would respectfully request 25 this court to first ascertain whether 1 or not Mr. Andrews has an attorney \ _ . .. t present in court with him, and if he 3 has, to have his attorney advise him 4 of his Constitutional rights, and if he has not, have The Court advise him 6 as to his Constitutional rights or 7 the fact that this man has been con- 8 victed for perjury on this matter, 9 .that case is presently before the 10 Louisiana Supreme Court and there is 11 pending another perjury case dealing 12 with this same subject matter. In ‘\ 13 all fairness fo Mr. Andrews, I think . i 14 he should have advice of counsel. 15 THE COURT: 16 Do you have an attorney you wish to be 17 present with you before we proceed 18 with this matter? 19 MR. ANDREWS: 20 My attorney is present in court, Your ‘1 Honor, Mr. Michael Barry. He is my 22 associate in the practice of law. 23 THE COURT: 24 Is he present in court? i 2! MR. ANDREWS: -. c- *., Reference CC;~, JF.T c-l .-- - 1 Yes, Your Honor. t 2 THE COURT: 3 . 3 Step up, Mr. Barry. 4 Just have a seat here for a 5 moment. 6 I would like to make a prelimin- 7 ary statement. 8 As you well know -- just have a 9 seat there, sir. As you know, the 10 fact that you are called as a witness 11 in a case, that does not all of a 12 sudden take away from your 13 Constittitional privileges under the -.-3 14 State Constitution. YOU cannot be 15 forced to incriminate yourself by 16 answers. Under Louisiana jurisprudent 17 you cannot be asked have you been 18 arrested or charged, you can only be 19 asked have you been convicted. The 20 fact that you are on appeal, I will 21 not permit the question to be asked 22 have you been convicted because it 23 is not a final matter, it is still in 24 the process of being appealed. 25 With respect to other matters Reference CC;~, JF.I csl 1 that you know as a factual nature, 2 that fs the question to be determined 3 whether you will or will not answer 4 these questions. You may take the 5 position on a given question that 6 you refuse to answer on the grounds 7 that it may incriminate you and 8 subject you to a future criminal 9 prosecution, I will have to rule on 10 it whether it will or will not, but 11 the question whether or not they can 12 ask you, a question of character, of 13 your credibility, they cannot ask you 14 have. you been charged or have you bee 15 indicted or have you been arrested, 16 the only question they could ask you 17 if have you been convicted, and I wil 18 advise both the State and Defense I 19 will not permit that question to be 20 asked of Mr. Andrews because the ‘1 conviction is not final. It is on 22 appeal to the State Supreme court 23 and could possibly be appealed from 24 the State Supreme Court to the 25 United States Supreme Court, so I wou I c Reference cc;y, jyx ,--I - 1 like to know if Mr. Barry would like i E 2 to confer with you to add to any- 3 thing I may have said. 4 MR. BARRY: 5 We have previously conferred, Your Honor. 6 THE COURT: 7 Do you feel that Mr. Andrews is ready to 8 proceed with the trial? 9 MR. BARRY: 10 Ready to proceed, Your Honor. 11 THE COURT: 12 You will be in the Jury's place there, 13 just have a seat here (indicating). 14 MR. DYMOND: 15 We will have no objection to having 16 Mr. Barry sit along the side of 17 Mr. Andrews. 18 MR. ALCOCK: 19 Before you bring 'the Jury back in, I would 20 like one minor clarification. I will 71 certainly abide by the Court's in- 22 struction that I may not ask this 23 witness whether or not he has been . 24 convicted because this conviction is 25 on appeal: however, the Court is not 1 making a ruling to the fact that I 2 may not go into the subject matter 3 of that conviction? 4 THE COURT: 5 I did not state that. 6 MR. ALCOCX: 7 I just wanted to clarify that. 8 THE COURT: 9 We can get another chair. Don't we have 10 one here? 11 (Discussion off the record.) 12 THE COURT: 13 Let the record show that out of the 14 presence of the Jury the witness has I5 been advised by The Court of his 16 constitutional rights and is in 17 attendance with his attorney, 18 Mr. Michael Barry. 19 You may proceed, Mr. Dymond. 20 . ..ooo... 21 DEAN A. ANDREWS, JR., 22 having been first duly sworn by The Minute Clerk, wa' ‘3 examined and testified as follows: 24 DIRECT EXAMINATION 25 BY MR. DYMOND: 1 Q you are Mr. Dean Andrews? 2 A I am. 3 Q Mr. Andrews, are you an attorney here in the 4 City of New Orleans? 5 A I am. 6 Q HOW long have you been engaged in the 7 practice, sir? 8 A About 18 years. 9 Q Now, Mr. Andrews, referring to November of 10 1963, and more particularly the 22nd and 11 the days immediately thereafter, did you 12 have occasion to be confined in the 13 hospital here in New Orleans? 14 A I was confined to Hotel Dieu Hospital, I be- 15 lieve I had double pneumonia. 16 THE COURT: 17 You don't have to volunteer too much, jusl 18 simply yes or no. 19 THE WITNESS: 20 Yes. 21 BY MR. DYMOND: 22 Q While in Hotel Dieu Hospital, Mr. Andrews, 23 did you receive a telephone call of an 24 unusual nature? ' ‘5 A Well, I received a telephone call. 9 1 Q Would you kindly tell US from whom you receive< 2 this telephone call. 3 THE COURT: 4 That presumes he knows, does it not? 5 BY MR. DYMOND: 6 Q If you know, Mr. Andrews. 7 A May it please The Court, I have to take two One -- 8 objections to that question. 9 THE COURT: 10 Mr. Andrews, speak a little louder. We 11 have to get it in the record and we 12 have to hear it. YOU may make your 13 statement. 14 THE WITNESS: 15 One, the attorney-client privilege, and, 16 secondly, an answer to this question 17 in relationship to the charge that 18 is pending, presently pending that 19 I haven't been tried on yet, might, 20 may. might, tend, would or could 2i connect me with the link of circum- 22 stances which would incriminate me. 23 THE COURT: 24 Let's see now. I have to rule on this. 25 He refuses to answer, one it would 1 violate the attorney-client relation- : : 2 ship and secondly it could-tend to 3 possibly incriminate him in a 4 presently pending charge. Is that s it? 6 THE WITNESS: 7 Yes. 8 BY MR. DYMOND: 9 Q With respect to any telephone calls that you 10 received -- 11 THE COURT: 12 I haven't ruled yet. I rule that the 13 objections that he made are good. 14 You may rephrase your question IS if you wish. You may pursue it in 16 a different vein. 17 BY MR. DYMOND: 18 Q The telephone call that you have said that you 19 did receive, Mr. Andrews, was that a 20 long-distance call or a local call? 21 A A local call. 22 0 And when did you receive it, sir? 23 A I don't remember the time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lawyer Says He Knows the Real 'Clay Bertrand'
    'HE NEW Yad'ioli? TIMES, THURSDAY, JUNE 29, 1967 Lawyer Says He Knows the Real 'Clay Bertrand' By GENE ROBERTS ' Mr. Andrews's testimony to a convicted burglar, was being Special to Tee New York Timex the Warren Commission about truthful when he charged re- NEW ORLEANS, June 28- the mysterious "Mr. Bertrand" cently that a member of Mr. A New Orleans lawyer said to- was one of the developments Garrison's staff had asked him day he knows the true identity that led Mr. Garrison to con- to "put something into" Mr. of a mystery figure who has, clude that President Kennedy's Shaw's apartment. played a major role in District death was the result of a con- He said he could not vouch Attorney Jim Garrison's investi- spiracy. for the story "words for word." gation of the Kennedy assassi- Mr. Andrews, a rotund man But, he said, "somebody In the nation. who talks in Damon Runyon district attorney's office told Dean A. Andrews, the lawyer. style, told Warren Commission me a long time back that Can- said the real "Clay Bertrand" lawyers that Clay Bertrand sent cler had been asked to break Is the operator of a local bar Lee Harvey Oswald to his law Into Shaw's apartment." and not Clay L. Shaw, a busi- office in the summer of 1983. He also said he was "con- nessman arrested after he was Oswald is the man who, accord- stantly surprised" at the way accused by Mr. Garrison of par- ing to the commission, killed An which Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • John Mccone and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy
    C061B5413 Approved for Release: 2014/09/29 C06185413 •' •' , S&GRIH'!JNOFORN Death of a President (U) DCI John McCone and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy David Robarge (U) In recognition ofthe .50th anniversary ofthe assassination ofPresident John F. Kennedy on 22 November 1963, Studies in Intelligence reprints the below, which originally appeared as a chajJter in ChiefHistorian Da\tld Robarge:S bookJohn McCone as Director ofCentral Intelligence, 1961-1?65, published by the Center for the Study ofIntelligence in 200.5. (U) Misconceptions abound regarding CIA~ connection to the assas· sination and its role in subsequent investigations, contributing to the foct that, according to a recent polltalrm by the History Chan· (U) Walter Elder dashed nel, 71 percent ofthe American public still believes that Kennedy's in and cried'' out, 'The del:lth reniltedfrom a conspiracy. president's been shot/' ·(U) Robarge tells a very different story about Cl.A!! immediDte response to the assassination, ils interaction wilh the FBI and War­ ren Commission, the surprise appearance ofKGB defector Htri Nosenko with troubling information about Lee Harvey Oswald, and DC/ McCone's involvement with later inquiries about Kennedy's '' murder. Nothing in tlie numerous books and articles about the ass~sination that have appeared since the publication ofMcCone has materially changed any ofRobarge~ conclusions. (S) Jolut McCone and Lyman K.irk7 leaving, over hu1th, wanted to talk patrick, the Agency's Executive about the PFIAB meeting with his Director-Comptroller, met with Presi· senior deputies. They were eating in dent's Foreign Intelligence Advisory the French Room, a smaJI space next Boanl (PFIAB) through the morning .to the director•s office, when of22 November 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK Characters
    Page 1 JFK Characters As you start reading about the JFK John Abt assassination, you quickly realize that there are thousands of people involved John Abt was a lawyer for the Communist party. in one way or another. Keeping track of When LHO was arrested in Dallas, he asked for Abt who’s who gets to be a challenge. to represent him. LHO wasn’t a communist or That’s why I created this list of some of marxist, but he pretended to be as part of his CIA the major (and minor) players in the undercover assignment. Asking to have Abt as his complex story. It is designed to give lawyer was intended to be a signal to his you a quick idea of the most relevant intelligence handlers that his cover was still intact facts about each of the characters and that he was still playing along. He wanted his listed, and it is intended as a quick handlers to know that they could count on his reference tool. (However, just reading silence. down the list of characters is one way to get a lot of information about the events of November 22, 1963, in Juan Adames Dallas, Texas.) Juan Adames provided information to HSCA It is by no means complete, as that is (House Select Committee on Investigations) beyond my scope. But I do plan to keep investigator Gaeton Fonzi, working in Miami. adding characters as I learn more Adames told Fonzi about Bernardo Gonzales de about the death of JFK. Torres Alvarez (de Torres), who had been working for CIA since 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963. Christina Paige Jones East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2001 The ndE of Camelot: An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963. Christina Paige Jones East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Christina Paige, "The ndE of Camelot: An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963." (2001). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 114. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/114 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE END OF CAMELOT: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY IN 1963 _______________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in History _______________ by Christina Paige Jones May 2001 _______________ Dr. Elwood Watson, Chair Dr. Stephen Fritz Dr. Dale Schmitt Keywords: John F. Kennedy, Civil Rights, Vietnam War ABSTRACT THE END OF CAMELOT: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY IN 1963 by Christina Paige Jones This thesis addresses events and issues that occurred in 1963, how President Kennedy responded to them, and what followed after Kennedy’s assassination. This thesis was created by using books published about Kennedy, articles from magazines, documents, telegrams, speeches, and Internet sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Shaw Trial 31
    Date:08/13/93 Page:1 JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FORM -----_-_____________------------------------------------------------------------ AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY : HSCA RECORD NUMBER : 180-10097-10183 RECORDS SERIES : NUMBERED FILES AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 002035 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DOCUMENT INFORMATION ORIGINATOR : NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FROM TO : TITLE DATE : 02/24/69 PAGES : 90 SUBJECTS : SHAW, CLAY L. FINCK, PIERCE A. GARRISON INVESTIGATOR STATE OF LOUISIANA V. CLAY L. SHAW DOCUMENT TYPE : TRANSCRIPT CLASSIFICATION : U RESTRICTIONS : OPEN IN FULL CURRENT STATUS : 0 DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 05/06/93 OPENING CRITERIA : COMMENTS : Transcript of court proceedings. Box 45. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [RI - ITEM IS RESTRICTED JFK Collection: HSCA (Rd 233) CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA . STATE OF LOUISIANA . 198-059 . vs. 1426(30) . -'! CLAY L. SHAW . SECTION "C" *' . \ I 1' i PROCEEDINGS IN OPEN COURT, Monday, February 24, 1969 . .:- . Dietriclr & Pickett, Inc. _ ._ S-%P . .. 333 ST. CHARLES AVENUE, SUITE 1221 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130- 822-3111 IITNESS: DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS 'IERRE A. FINCK,M.D. 2 42 --------EXHIBITS WMBER IDENTIFIED OFFERED RECEIVED 6 j-27 18 18 19 b-28 27 .28 30 . - I-29 35 36 36 - z i-67 55 we -- . L i-68 64-68 68 68 a L-69 77 78 78 ,._ . ;-70 79 . 79 79 : ..-.._ ; ;.- - i... _ ; _‘-. ‘I, 14 i.. .,., .:.’ ., .i .\.. .-..- / 15 .,. 16 i 17 1 18 ! - - 19 4 . ;.” . :. J :*. 21 . -: .: .I _, -.:-. ‘- . 22 . 23 . .. ,. .:.-. 24 . .~ ‘2 1 25 -@ , . _. Bring the Jury down. I trust you gentlemen had a nice weekend. Is the State and the Defense ready to proceed? 6 MR. DYMOND: Ready. , MR.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TAKING of AMERICA, 1-2-3 by Richard E
    THE TAKING OF AMERICA, 1-2-3 by Richard E. Sprague Richard E. Sprague 1976 Limited First Edition 1976 Revised Second Edition 1979 Updated Third Edition 1985 About the Author 2 Publisher's Word 3 Introduction 4 1. The Overview and the 1976 Election 5 2. The Power Control Group 8 3. You Can Fool the People 10 4. How It All BeganÐThe U-2 and the Bay of Pigs 18 5. The Assassination of John Kennedy 22 6. The Assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King and Lyndon B. Johnson's Withdrawal in 1968 34 7. The Control of the KennedysÐThreats & Chappaquiddick 37 8. 1972ÐMuskie, Wallace and McGovern 41 9. Control of the MediaÐ1967 to 1976 44 10. Techniques and Weapons and 100 Dead Conspirators and Witnesses 72 11. The Pardon and the Tapes 77 12. The Second Line of Defense and Cover-Ups in 1975-1976 84 13. The 1976 Election and Conspiracy Fever 88 14. Congress and the People 90 15. The Select Committee on Assassinations, The Intelligence Community and The News Media 93 16. 1984 Here We ComeÐ 110 17. The Final Cover-Up: How The CIA Controlled The House Select Committee on Assassinations 122 Appendix 133 -2- About the Author Richard E. Sprague is a pioneer in the ®eld of electronic computers and a leading American authority on Electronic Funds Transfer Systems (EFTS). Receiving his BSEE degreee from Purdue University in 1942, his computing career began when he was employed as an engineer for the computer group at Northrup Aircraft. He co-founded the Computer Research Corporation of Hawthorne, California in 1950, and by 1953, serving as Vice President of Sales, the company had sold more computers than any competitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazing Facts About the JFK Assassination Donald E
    Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Popular Media Faculty Scholarship 11-14-2018 Amazing Facts About the JFK Assassination Donald E. Wilkes Jr. University of Georgia School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Wilkes, Donald E. Jr., "Amazing Facts About the JFK Assassination" (2018). Popular Media. 298. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_pm/298 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Popular Media by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. Amazing Facts About the JFK Assassination By Donald E. Wilkes, Jr. - November 14, 2018 Fifty-five years ago, at 12:30 p.m. on Friday, Nov. 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by hidden sniper fire in Dealey Plaza in downtown Dallas, TX. This terrible event is still enveloped in mystery. The alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, stridently denied committing the crime, never received legal representation, and was suspiciously murdered while in police custody two days after the assassination. Inept pathologists botched President Kennedy’s autopsy, to put it mildly. Witnesses and persons of interest soon began dying violent or suspicious deaths. The first official investigation of the assassination, undertaken by the Warren Commission, was hurried, inadequate and stacked in favor of the theory that Oswald was the lone assassin. The second official investigation,12 years later, by a select committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, was hamstrung by political bickering, time and money limitations, unavailability of or failures of memory by witnesses, loss of evidence (including intentional destruction of documents), and the CIA’s refusal to meaningfully cooperate with the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Hyde Paine Papers on Marina Oswald RG5.109 FHL Staff
    Ruth Hyde Paine Papers on Marina Oswald RG5.109 FHL staff. Last updated on May 14, 2021. Friends Historical Library of Swarthmore College Ruth Hyde Paine Papers on Marina Oswald Table of Contents Summary Information....................................................................................................................................3 Biography/History..........................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents....................................................................................................................................... 5 Arrangement...................................................................................................................................................5 Administrative Information........................................................................................................................... 6 Related Materials........................................................................................................................................... 6 Controlled Access Headings..........................................................................................................................7 Collection Inventory...................................................................................................................................... 8 Ser. 1. Correspondence, 1963-1966.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A 3-D Lighting and Shadow Analysis of the JFK Zapruder Film (Frame 317)
    A 3-D Lighting and Shadow Analysis of the JFK Zapruder Film (Frame 317) Hany Farid Department of Computer Science 6211 Sudikoff Lab Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 603.646.2761 (tel) 603.646.1672 (fax) [email protected] Abstract Claims of a broader conspiracy behind U.S. President John F. Kennedy's assassination have persisted for the past nearly five decades. The Zapruder film is considered to be the most complete recording of JFK's assassination. Many have claimed that this 8mm film was manipulated to conceal evidence of a second shooter, which would invalidate the claim that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, was responsible for JFK's assassination. Here we con- sider the viability of one specific claim of postproduction tampering in the Zapruder film. 1. Introduction United States President John F. Kennedy was assassinated on November 22nd, 1963 while his procession was driving through Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas. Shortly afterwards, Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested and charged with the crime. Because he was killed before his trial, and the conclusions of the Warren Commission[1] have been challenged, many questions surrounding the assassination remained unanswered. Since this time, numerous theories have circulated suggesting that Oswald acted as part of a larger criminal con- spiracy involving a variety of government, international, or criminal groups. Abraham Zapruder captured the most complete documentation of the events of November 22nd with his Bell & Howell 8mm roll film camera. After Figure 1: Frame 317 of the Zapruder film (left), and a magnified view of JFK { the authenticity of the shadow on the back of JFK's head has been called into question.
    [Show full text]
  • Cel, 11)37 P. 59 - Playboy Interview: Jim Garrison 2Rie Norden
    CeL, 11)37 p. 59 - Playboy interview: Jim Garrison 2rie Norden • FALL & WINTER FASHION FORECAST TEN-PAGE PICTORIAL ON THE HIPPIES YOUR PLAYBOY JAZZ & POP POLL BALLOT AN.EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH JIM OARIIISON PLUS NORMAN MAILER AND HERBERT GOLD CeL, 11)37 p. 59 - Playboy interview: Jim Garrison 2rie Norden • FALL & WINTER FASHION FORECAST TEN-PAGE PICTORIAL ON THE HIPPIES YOUR PLAYBOY JAZZ & POP POLL BALLOT AN.EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH JIM OARIIISON PLUS NORMAN MAILER AND HERBERT GOLD vol. 14, no. 10—october, 1967 LAYBOY. CONTENTS FOR THE MEN'S ENTERTAINMENT MAGAZINE 3 DEAR PLAYBOY 9 PLAYBOY AFTER HOURS 25 THE PLAYBOY ADVISOR._ _ — 49 PLAYBOY'S INTERNATIONAL DATEBOOK—travel_.......................PATRICK CHASE 53 Hippie Scene P. 128 THE PLAYBOY FORUM 35 PLAYBOY INTERVIEW: JIM GARRISON—candid AAAAAAAAAAAAAA 59 THE POP-OP CAPER—tictien F. NOLAN 76 THE FOX—pictorial- El RIPPLES—fiction._ .---__RAY RUSSELL 57 THE ENGLISH HUNT BREAKFAST—Iaed._____ ........ __THOMAS MARIO 88 THE CRAZY 01411—memeir...._---.-...-----..NORMAN MAILER 91 Music Poll P. 121 COMPUTERS—THEIR BUILT-IN LIMITATIONS—article.___MAX GUNTHER 94 COMPUTERS—THEIR SCOPE TODAY—artIcle__.......---EANEST HAYEMANN 95 CLEANER THAN DIRT — satire D 0 LLOYD 98 REAGAN FOR PLAYMATE!—playboy's playmate al the month._ 102 PLAYBOY'S PARTY JOKES—burstor 110 PLAYBOY'S FALL II WINTER FASHION FORECAST—attire......ROBERT L GREEN 113 THE 1968 PLAYBOY JAZZ i POP POLL—lair/pep 121 DO IT FOR A PENNY?—fletlan_._HARLAN ELLISON and HASKELL BARKIN 127 THE NEW WAVE MAKERS—artIcr.......—.---...---HERBERT GOLD 128 LUST OP THE HOLY MAN—ribald 139 THE LUXURY OP LEATHER—accouterments...—.--_------- 142 HUGH M.
    [Show full text]
  • November 22 1963 the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy A
    November 22 1963 The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy A Lincoln City Libraries Booklist compiled on the 50th Anniversary of the Historic Events At 12:30 p.m. on November 22, 1963, while traveling in an open-air motorcade through Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States of America, was assassinated by gunfire from the Texas School Book Depository, alongside the presidential motorcade route. Arrested later that day was Lee Harvey Oswald, a former U.S. Marine who had defected to the Soviet Union and then returned to the U.S. in 1962. Arraigned for the murder of Kennedy and Dallas police office J.D. Tippit, Oswald himself was killed by Dallas night club owner Jack Ruby while he was being transferred between jails. An official governmental investigation into the assassination – the President’s Commission on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy, chaired by Earl Warren (Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States) – concluded in an 889-page report, released in September 1964, that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in shooting Kennedy, as did Ruby in later killing Oswald. Conspiracy theories have abounded in the decades following the Warren Commission’s findings, and numerous other investigations of the assassination have resulted in a variety of other “official” opinions. The United States House Select Committee on Assassinations, formed in 1976, released a report in 1979 that concluded that although Oswald was, indeed the “lone shooter”, there may very well have been a conspiracy behind his actions to assassinate Kennedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Shaw Trial 2: 2-6-69 (Garrison's Opening Statement)
    ,.. ,... .. - .: - ._ ._. REPRODUCED AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES -k ._- __.__ - ..-_ _ ,.-.,-- -. ‘- .-e- . _ . .--x--b .._I %. .-. ..- _ . .._ . ___+___-b -_..- --.---_- -.-. --. --. .-e-- _. _ --_ _ .-” I _- CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS . STATE OF LOUISIANA . STATE OF LOUISIANA . 198-059 . vs. 1426 (30) . ' CLAY L. SEAW . SECTIOX "C" . ., . _:. :- 7.y' EXCERPT FROM PROCEEDINGS IN C2EN COURT 027 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1969, BEFORE: THE HOKORABLE ED:fARD A. HAGGERTY, JR. JUDGE, SECTION "C" Idietrich Cy-Pickett, Inc. 333 ST. CHARLES AVENUE, SUlfE 1221 NEW ORLEANS. LOUISIANA 70130- 522.3111 .:_ . .._ _ . .- . 1 e. OPENING STATEMENT OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY , MR.. GARRISON: May it please the court: Gentlemen of the Jury, you have been im- posed on, to some extent unavoidably, because you have to be sequestered, and I am about to impose On you one more time, because I have to read to you a rather lengthy opening state- ment. The reason I have to read it 11 is because under our law we cannot 12 introduce evidence which has not 13 been described, at least generally, 14 in the opening statement, so as a- 15 result prosecuting attorneys in - It Louisiana have to read their opening 17 statements in order to make sure the1 18 have touched every point of evidence L ;- 19 that they intend to introduce. .So I 2c hope you will bear with me, and I 21 will try and make it as painless as 2: possible. 2: I am going to read it verbatim, because 2 I intend to give a copy to the Defen! for their convenience as soon as I 2 .
    [Show full text]