Cheshire Roadside Verge Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cheshire Roadside Verge Survey Cheshire Roadside Verge Survey Volume I: Report and Recommendations October 1995 NHl CHESHIRE->ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Volume I: Report and Recommendations October 1995 CHESHIRE ^ECOLOGICAL SERVICES CHESHIRE ROADSIDE VERGE SURVEY 1995 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ROADSIDE VERGES - AN OVERVIEW Threats to Roadside Verges 5 Importance of Roadside Verges 6 ORIGINAL CONCEPT 7 METHODOLOGY 7 CRITERIA 8 EXISTING ROADSIDE VERGE MAINTENANCE REGIME 8 VERGES IDENTIFIED DURING 10 CHESTER CITY COUNCILS NATURE CONSERVATION AUDIT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 11 Floristic interest 11 Boundaries 13 Butterflies in Roadside Verges 13 Birds on Verges 14 Reptiles and Amphibians 14 NEW VERGES IDENTIFIED 16 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 18 SUMMARY OF ROADSIDE VERGES OF 20 NATURE CONSERVATION IMPORTANCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE 24 MONITORING AND DESIGNATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 26 REFERENCES 27 LIST OF TABLES Table I: 9 Rural Mowing Regimes. Table II: 10 Areas of Nature Conservation Value Identified in Chester City Councils Nature Conservation Audit. Table HI: 10 Sites of Nature Conservation Importance Identified in Chester City Council's Nature Conservation Audit Table IV: 13 , Cheshire Roadside Verges Suspected to hold MG5 Communities ) Table V: 14 Butterfly Species seen and their foodplants r Table VI: 16 , New Roadside Verges of Nature Conservation Importance Identified within Congleton Borough Council. r \ Table VH: 17 New Roadside Verges of Nature Conservation T Importance Identified within the Peak Park, l Table VEft: 20 r Summary of Roadside Verges of Nature Conservation u Importance in Cheshire. _ Table IX: 26 U Recommendation for Notification of SBI and RVNR. m r LIST OF FIGURES • r Figure I: 12 U Cross-section Through Typical Roadside Verge. P Figure II: 15 t» Distribution of Roadside Verges by 10 km squares. .P Figure JH: 20 Recommended Mowing Regimes for Roadside Verges. P fa. ™ LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix I: 27 Nationally Important Verges in Cheshire Identified in 1973 Appendix II: 28 Existing Roadside Verge SBI's Appendix HI: 29 English Names of Plant Species Identified during the Survey Appendix IV: 33 Butterfly Species Observed During the Course of the Survey Appendix V: 34 Bird Species Observed During the Course of the Survey Appendix VI: 35 Sample Completed Road Verge Survey Form Appendix VH: 36 Mowing Regime Questionnaire m •H P © Cheshire Ecological Services Cheshire Roadside Verge Survey 1995 INTRODUCTION Most of the natural vegetation of Cheshire has been eroded over the centuries to make way for agriculture, housing, industry and roads. Roadside verges, particularly those alongside minor and unclassified roads, often represent the last remaining fragments of habitats which have largely vanished. Consequently they can be important reservoirs for a wide range of species of plants and animals. There are approximately 3,200 kilometres (2,000 miles) of roads in Cheshire; these offer immense potential for the management of their verges as wildlife corridors and grassland reserves. Some verges already receive sympathetic management as a result of the 1973 Roadside Verge Survey conducted by members of the (then) Cheshire Conservation Trust. At this time the County Council signed the Royal Society for Nature Conservation's (RSNC) Roadside Charter. This survey has not been reviewed in recent years, so the extent or value of this management has not been analysed. In the 1973 survey 90 Roadside Verges of Nature Conservation Importance (RVNCI) were identified and the County Council notified of their locations1. Eight of these verges had been recognised as being of national conservation importance by the Biological Records Centre in 1969. See Appendix I for a full list. In late 1994 The Wildlife Trusts Partnership launched their Roadside Verge Report, the result of consultations with Wildlife Trusts throughout the UK and their involvement with the management of roadside verges. When completing the consultation document for the report it was apparent that the Cheshire Wildlife Trust held very little data on the subject. This report sets out to rectify the lack of up to date knowledge. The importance of Roadside Verges has been identified by the Cheshire County Council and Cheshire Wildlife Trust since 1984 by the inclusion of some roadside verges as Sites of Biological Importance (SBI). Details of roadside verges that are SBI's are contained in Appendix II. Although this offers no statutory protection, it does highlight the importance of the verge and can offer some protection through the planning process. The aims of the 1995 survey were threefold; • To review the 1973 list of Roadside Verges of Nature Conservation Importance • To revise and update the 1973 list • To prepare a working document for use by the Highways Department of the Cheshire County Council Engineering Department on the management of roadside verges Funding for the project was secured from the Engineers section of Cheshire County Council, Peak Park Joint Planning Board, Congleton Borough Council and Warrington Borough Council. 1JMMay(1974); Co-operation for Conservation of'Rural RoadVerges. ITE. © Cheshire Ecological Services Cheshire Roadside Verge Survey 1995 ROADSIDE VERGES - AN OVERVIEW The image of a roadside verge conjures up visions of a wide flowery sward with the occasional mature tree backed by a hedge - or does it? Nationwide, verges vary from sunken lanes with steep banks, known as holloways, to wide droves and may be bounded by hedges, dry-stone walls or ditches all as stock- proof boundaries. The presence of holloways can indicate a very old road, the sunken lanes provide shelter to travellers from the sun in summer and more hostile elements during the winter months; their verge/banks were usually lined with trees, their roots exposed with cranesbills and ferns growing in the shaded areas. One or two holloways exist in Cheshire, for example Birtles Lane near Over Alderley. Many of these old roads can be traced on ancient maps. Quite often roads or droves would become wider, especially over common land, narrowing off as it passed off the common. With the advent of tarmac and metalled roads, these wider roads would be reduced in width to about a third of their former size and hence the concept of roadside verges came into being. Grass verges then became an important feature, especially in areas where the roads became muddy in wet weather - they provide drier areas for passing on, or where pedestrians could stand out of the way of passing wagons and carts, they were also used for grazing livestock. In many parishes a 'lengthman' was employed to keep the coarser vegetation under control and so led to a r richer and varied wildlife due to the intensive management. Threats f In recent years many verges have lost some of their original value for a variety of > reasons: • They are no longer grazed by livestock and have become scrubbed over. ** • Some are cut several times a year not allowing the wildflowers to develop and set seed, so encouraging the courser grasses. • They have suffered from the tipping of: "• • household waste, • garden refuse, • builders refuse. * • Road construction materials are stockpiled on them. m • In some cases, particularly adjacent to public footpaths, the verges have been , eroded by vehicles. • They have been lost by road widening or re-alignment. p • Cuttings from mowing left on the verges resulting in increased nitrates in the soil m which encourages coarser species. • Inadequate reinstatement after maintenance work or installation of services. ^ • Deposit of dredgings after cleaning out of roadside ditches. •> These threats to our verges have resulted in the loss of their floristic interest and w diversity, no longer providing 'green corridors' connecting fragmented woodland, and * grasslands. © Cheshire Ecological Services Cheshire Roadside Verge Survey 1995 Importance of roadside verges Despite the various threats to verges, many have survived to provide some excellent examples of our varied flora and fauna. Wide verges can offer several different habitats, from short regularly mown areas next to the road, through taller courses grasses to a hedgerow or field boundary at the rear. Some verges may also contain ponds offering another habitat. Nationally over 850 species of wildflower have been recorded on them, of which 35 are nationally rare species. They also provide habitat for many of our butterflies and moths, birds, mammals and reptiles. Many species of birds feed on the seeds of teasel and thistles (Cirsium spp.) in the autumn months. Verges managed for nature conservation interests therefore supply food for species such as Goldfinch and Greenfinch. This diversity of grasses and herbs provide a habitat that is great interest both botanically and aesthetically. Verges provide green corridors between adjacent parcels of woodland, grassland and other habitats and act as reservoirs for plants and animals from which colonisation of other areas can occur. This corridor effect has recently been shown by Vermeulen 2. Poorly managed verges can also cause problems for some species. A verge which is left unmanaged, allowing the vegetation to grow tall close to the road can provide suitable hunting ground for species such as the Barn Owl. This causes a problem in that owls hunting along the road get drawn into the path of oncoming vehicles, only to be killed or maimed. If a short sward is maintained in areas where Barn Owls are known to occur, then they will be restricted to hunting over the rear of the verge. It is therefore important that the presence (or absence) of Barn Owls in an area is known about prior to a mowing regime being recommended / established. With sympathetic management, many of these verges can become havens for many species, becoming Roadside Verge Nature Reserves, as has already happened in several counties including Essex, Lincolnshire, Lancashire and Worcestershire - will Cheshire be next? 2HJW Vermeulen (1994): Corridor function of a road verge for dispersal of stenotopic heathalnd ground beetles Carabidae. Biological Conservation ,69(3), 339- 349 © Cheshire Ecological Services Cheshire Roadside Verge Survey 1995 ORIGINAL CONCEPT Initially it had been hoped that local Parish Councils would be involved with the project.
Recommended publications
  • THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION for ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW of CHESHIRE WEST and CHESTER Draft Recommendations For
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER Draft recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Cheshire West and Chester August 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 ANTROBUS CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2017. WHITLEY CP SUTTON WEAVER CP Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information NETHERPOOL applied as part of this review. DUTTON MARBURY ASTON CP GREAT WILLASTON WESTMINSTER CP FRODSHAM BUDWORTH CP & THORNTON COMBERBACH NESTON CP CP INCE LITTLE CP LEIGH CP MARSTON LEDSHAM GREAT OVERPOOL NESTON & SUTTON CP & MANOR & GRANGE HELSBY ANDERTON PARKGATE WITH WINCHAM MARBURY CP WOLVERHAM HELSBY ACTON CP ELTON CP S BRIDGE CP T WHITBY KINGSLEY LOSTOCK R CP BARNTON & A GROVES LEDSHAM CP GRALAM CP S W LITTLE CP U CP B T E STANNEY CP T O R R N Y CROWTON WHITBY NORTHWICH CP G NORTHWICH HEATH WINNINGTON THORNTON-LE-MOORS D WITTON U ALVANLEY WEAVERHAM STOAK CP A N NORTHWICH NETHER N H CP CP F CAPENHURST CP D A WEAVER & CP PEOVER CP H M CP - CUDDINGTON A O D PUDDINGTON P N S C RUDHEATH - CP F T O H R E NORLEY RUDHEATH LACH CROUGHTON D - H NORTHWICH B CP CP DENNIS CP SAUGHALL & L CP ELTON & C I MANLEY
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes on the Pubic Submissions Item on the Agenda
    Meeting of Little Leigh Parish Council held on 11 January 2018 in Little Leigh Village Hall Attendance Councillors Beecroft, King, Kirkland, McSweeney and Tomlinson were present with 1 member of the public. Apologies were received from Cllrs Jones and Williamson and CWAC councillors Gibbon and Wright. The Chairman opened the meeting at 7.15pm. 1) Declarations of interest As all the parish councillors lived in the village they all had personal interests. In addition Cllr Jones was a trustee of the Little Leigh Community Trust and Councillors Jones, King and McSweeney were also trustees of the Village Hall Committee. 2) Amendment to standing orders Resolution 1 11.01.2018 Councillors approved the amendment to standing orders which required 5 working days notice of items to be raised by members of the public and a 5 minute limit to the time each member of the public could speak with an overall limit of 20 minutes on the pubic submissions item on the agenda. This brought procedures in line with other parish councils and National Association of Local Councils guidance. Proposed Cllr King, seconded Cllr Tomlinson voting unanimous. 3) There were no new public submissions. 4) Minutes of Meeting held on 8 November 2017 Resolution 2 11.01.2018 : Council approved the minutes of the meeting held on 8 November 2017 as being a true record of that meeting. Proposed Cllr Tomlinson Seconded Cllr Beecroft Voting Unanimous 5) Clerks report Highways issues Speed limit assessments for the centre of the village were underway and Hole House Lane assessment was expected by end March 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3 JUNE, 1924. 4447 in the County of Lancaster
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3 JUNE, 1924. 4447 In the county of Lancaster. 8. An Area comprising: — The county boroughs of St. Helens and In the county of Gloucester. Warrington. The borough of Leigh. The petty sessional division of Campden. The petty sessional division of Warrington, In the county of Oxford. and The parishes of Claydon, Clattercote, The parishes of Bold, Ashton-in-Makerfield, Mollington, Copredy, Bourton, Hamwell, Abram, Lowton, Kenyon, and Culcheth. Horley, Hornton, Wroxton, Dray ton, North Newington, East Shutford, West Shutford, In the county of Salop. Swalcliffe, Sibford Ferris, Sibford Gower, The borough of Oswestry. Epwell, Shenington, and Alkerton. The petty sessional division of Oswestry, and In the county of Northampton. The parishes of Ellesmere Rural, Bllesmere The borough of Daventry. Urban, Welshampton, Whitchurch Rural, Whitchurch Urban, Ightfield, and Ruyton of The petty sessional division of Daventry, the Eleven Towns. and The parishes of Upper Boddington, Lower In the county of Denbigh. Boddington, Bugbrooke, Kislingbury, Upton, The borough of Wrexham, and Harpole, Upper Heyford, Nether Hey ford, The petty sessional divisions of Bromfield, Floore, Brington, Althorp, Harlestone, Church liuabon, and Brampton, Chapel Brampton, Spratton, Holdenby, East Haddon, Ravensthorpe, The parish of Chirk. Teeton, Great Creaton, Cottesbrooke, Hollo- In the county of Flint. well, Coton, Guilsborough, Thornby, Cold The petty sessional divisions of Hope, and Ashby, Welford, Sulby, Hothorpe, Marston Overton, and the detached part of the petty Trussell, Sibertoft, Olipston, Naseby, Hasel- sessional division of Hawarden. bech, Kelmarsh, and Maidwell. 6. An Area comprising: — In the county of Worcester. In the couniy of Stafford. The borough of Stourbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Review Portfolio Holders
    Appendix Title: Local Government Re-organisation – Judicial Review Portfolio Holders: Cllr Graham Payne, Leader Cllr Rod Eaton, Change and Integration Portfolio Holder Reporting Officer: Nicola Mathiason - Head of Legal and Democratic Services Andrew Pate - Chief Executive Key Decision: No ______________________________________________________________ Purpose • To decide whether to redirect the Council's legal efforts and resources, from a separate judicial review, to support for the Shrewsbury and Atcham and Congleton appeal. Background • On 8 August 2007 Cabinet agreed that the Council should commence legal proceedings for Judicial Review against the Secretary of State’s decision about Local Government Reorganisation in Wiltshire. The Council’s case has been ‘on hold’ until the result of the Shrewsbury and Congleton Judicial Review was known. The judgement in this case has now been delivered. The judicial review was unsuccessful. The High Court Judge held that the Secretary of State had common law powers available to her to carry out the process, that she did not have to be satisfied that a proposal met the criteria at the time of the assessment and that she had not acted irrationally. Key Issues • Advice has been taken from our Counsel (who also acts for Shrewsbury and Congleton) on whether we should now continue with our case in the light of the Shrewsbury judgement. We have been advised that unless the Shrewsbury judgement is appealed successfully we cannot effectively progress our case. The grounds of our case are similar and the arguments we would raise are much the same as Shrewsbury raised. We have been advised that we should focus on supporting an appeal by Shrewsbury and Congleton.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of April Meeting Resolution 1:09.07.20 the Minutes of the Meeting Held on 23 April 2020 Were Approved
    LITTLE LEIGH PARISH COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY 9 JULY 2020 Due to the COVID -19 pandemic the meeting was held in accordance with the Local Authority (Flexibility of Local Authority Meetings) ( England) Regulations 2020. Councillors Beecroft, Jones, King, Kirkland, McSweeney and Williamson were present with Ward Councillor Gibbon and one member of the public. Apologies were tendered from Cllr Tomlinson and Ward councillors Marshall and Wright. • Declarations of interest- As all the parish councillors lived in the village they all had personal interests. In addition Cllr Jones was a trustee of the Little Leigh Community Trust and Councillors Jones, King and McSweeney were also trustees of the Village Hall Management Committee. • Public submissions – Cllr King had responded to a query regarding broadband problems. 3) Minutes of April meeting Resolution 1:09.07.20 The minutes of the meeting held on 23 April 2020 were approved. Proposed Cllr King seconded Cllr Kirkland voting unanimous. 4) Clerks report • The village hall remained closed due to the COVID 19 pandemic. It would reopen only after a risk assessment. • The village show had been cancelled. 5) Little Leigh circular walk footpath improvements Following an inspection in 2017 Cheshire West and Chester had made several improvements to the well- used circular walk from the A533 to Stoneheyes Lane and Cogshall Lane but further kissing gates were needed to replace stiles. Funds for upgrading footpaths had been set aside in the current budget. Resolution 2 :09.07.2020 Councillors agreed that Cllrs Beecroft and McSweeney would investigate obtaining permission from the relevant landowners to install kissing gates.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Service Centre Background Paper
    Cheshire 1 How to comment on this document 2 2 Introduction 3 W 3 Policy Context 4 est and 4 Methodology 6 Chester 5 Settlement Scoring 11 6 Local Service Centres - Options 14 Council Appendices Local Service A List of Settlements Within the Borough 16 B Services and Facilities - Sources of Information 18 Centre C Detailed Settlement Assessment 20 Background D Sustainability Appraisal 26 Paper - consultation version (March 2015) 1 How to comment on this document 2 Cheshire 1 How to comment on this document We would like to receive your views on the approach taken to identify local service centres. The responses W will be used to inform the preparation of the Local Plan (Part Two) Land Allocations and Detailed Policies. est and This consultation will run from Monday 9th March 2015 to Friday 24th April 2015 at 5pm. Chester Comments can be submitted: Council through the Council's consultation portal (via www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/localplan - please click "Add Comments" next to the questions so tell us your views) Local by email to [email protected] Service or sent in writing to the following address: Planning Policy Centre Cheshire West and Chester Council 4 Civic Way Background Ellesmere Port CH65 0BE Paper You may find the following documents and information useful in commenting: - consultation Adopted Local Plan (Part One) Strategic Policies which can be viewed via the following link: http://consult.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/portal/cwc_ldf/adopted_cwac_lp/lp_1_adopted?tab=files version (March 2015) 3 2 Introduction Cheshire 2.1 This report sets out the Council's intended approach to identifying local service centres for inclusion within the Local Plan (Part Two) Land Allocations and Detailed Policies (Part Two Plan).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report & Accounts 2012-13
    Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts Annual Report & Accounts 2012/13 Registered charity number: 207238 Version: 07/10/2013 10:17:20 Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts CONTENTS for the year ended 31 March 2013 Page Chair‟s Report 2 Chair of TWT England‟s Report 3 Trustees‟ Report 4-19 Auditor‟s Report 20-21 Accounting Policies 22-23 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 24 Consolidated and Society Balance Sheets 25 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 26 Notes to the Financial Statements 27-39 The following pages do not form part of the statutory financial statements: Appendix: Grant Expenditure by Organisation 40-47 Page | 1 Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts CHAIR‟S REPORT for the year ended 31 March 2013 It has been an „eventful‟ year for me, my first as appointment. It is clear that the movement owes Chair of our 100-year-old movement. It all started them a great debt. with a bang - our tremendous centenary celebration at the Natural History Museum. At this It seems to me that this dynamic, creative event we traced our history back to our founder, movement is as united and effective as ever. Charles Rothschild, and awarded our medal in his, and his daughter Miriam‟s name, to philanthropist Peter De Haan. There were other occasions for celebration as well, including Sir David Attenborough presenting our centenary medal to Ted Smith, the father of the modern Wildlife Trust movement. There was also a gathering of one hundred of our most committed people from across the UK at Highgrove where our Patron HRH The Prince of Wales recognised their achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Partnerships in Operation
    Catchment Partnerships in Operation 100 80 53 81 89 25 90 17 74 26 67 33 71 39 16 99 28 99 56 95 2 3 20 30 37 18 42 42 85 29 79 79 15 43 91 96 21 83 38 50 61 69 51 51 59 92 62 6 73 97 45 55 75 7 88 24 98 8 82 60 10 84 12 9 57 87 77 35 66 66 78 40 5 32 78 49 35 14 34 49 41 70 94 44 27 76 58 63 1 48 23 4 13 22 19 46 72 31 47 64 93 Legend Category No group yet established 0 20 40 80 Kilometres GSurobu cpa/gtcrhomupesn wt orking at sub catchment scale WGrhooulpe wcaotrckhinmge antt whole catchment scale © Crown Copyright and database right 2013. Ordnance Survey licence number 100024198. Map produced October 2013 © Copyright Environment Agency and database right 2013. Key to Management Catchment ID Catchment Sub/whole Joint ID Management Catchment partnership catchment Sub catchment name RBD Category Host Organisation (s) 1 Adur & Ouse Yes Whole South East England Yes Ouse and Adur Rivers Trust, Environment Agency 2 Aire and Calder Yes Whole Humber England No The Aire Rivers Trust 3 Alt/Crossens Yes Whole North West England No Healthy Waterways Trust 4 Arun & Western Streams Yes Whole South East England No Arun and Rother Rivers Trust 5 Bristol Avon & North Somerset Streams Yes Whole Severn England Yes Avon Wildlife Trust, Avon Frome Partnership 6 Broadland Rivers Yes Whole Anglian England No Norfolk Rivers Trust 7 Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level) Yes Whole Anglian England Yes The Rivers Trust, Anglian Water Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife 8 Cherwell Yes Whole Thames England No Trust 9 Colne Yes Whole Thames England
    [Show full text]
  • What the Crown May Do
    WHAT THE CROWN MAY DO 1. It is now established, at least at the level of the Court of Appeal (so that Court has recently stated)1, that, absent some prohibition, a Government minister may do anything which any individual may do. The purpose of this paper is to explain why this rule is misconceived and why it, and the conception of the “prerogative” which it necessarily assumes, should be rejected as a matter of constitutional law. 2. The suggested rule raises two substantive issues of constitutional law: (i) who ought to decide in what new activities the executive may engage, in what circumstances and under what conditions; and (ii) what is the scope for abuse that such a rule may create and should it be left without legal control. 3. As Sir William Wade once pointed out (in a passage subsequently approved by the Appellate Committee2), “The powers of public authorities are...essentially different from those of private persons. A man making his will may, subject to any rights of his dependants, dispose of his property just as he may wish. He may act out of malice or a spirit of revenge, but in law this does not affect his exercise of power. In the same way a private person has an absolute power to release a debtor, or, where the law permits, to evict a tenant, regardless of his motives. This is unfettered discretion.” If a minister may do anything that an individual may do, he may pursue any purpose which an individual may do when engaged in such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Report Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Knutsford
    Consultation Report Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Knutsford Town Council October 2018 Project name and Number: 16-024_Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Document Name and Revision: Consultation Report_001 Prepared by: TR/JP/BP Reviewed By: BP/JP Date of Issue: October 2018 Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Initial Residents Survey ............................................................................................................................... 5 3. Informal Consultation ............................................................................................................................... 10 4. Emerging Policies Consultation ............................................................................................................... 11 5. Regulation 14 Consultation ...................................................................................................................... 16 6. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 19 Appendix 1 – Initial Survey Age Gap Analysis ................................................................................................ 20 Appendix 2 – Initial Survey Gap Analysis (Location) ..................................................................................... 22 Appendix 3 – Informal Consultation Table ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Detailed Proposals for Each Ward – Organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP)
    Appendix 4 Detailed proposals for each Ward – organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP) Proposed Wards within the Knutsford Local Area Partnership Knutsford Local Area Partnership (LAP) is situated towards the north-west of Cheshire East, and borders Wilmslow to the north-east, Macclesfield to the south-east and Congleton to the south. The M6 and M56 motorways pass through this LAP. Hourly train services link Knutsford, Plumley and Mobberley to Chester and Manchester, while in the east of this LAP hourly trains link Chelford with Crewe and Manchester. The town of Knutsford was the model for Elizabeth Gaskell's novel Cranford and scenes from the George C. Scott film Patton were filmed in the centre of Knutsford, in front of the old Town Hall. Barclays Bank employs thousands of people in IT and staff support functions at Radbroke Hall, just outside the town of Knutsford. Knutsford is home to numerous sporting teams such as Knutsford Hockey Club, Knutsford Cricket Club, Knutsford Rugby Club and Knutsford Football Club. Attractions include Tatton Park, home of the RHS Flower show, the stately homes Arley Hall, Tabley House and Peover Hall, and the Cuckooland Museum of cuckoo clocks. In detail, the proposals are: Knutsford is a historic, self-contained urban community with established extents and comprises the former County Ward of Knutsford, containing 7 polling districts. The Parish of Knutsford also mirrors the boundary of this proposal. Knutsford Town is surrounded by Green Belt which covers 58% of this proposed division. The proposed ward has excellent communications by road, motorway and rail and is bounded to the north by Tatton Park and to the east by Birkin Brook.
    [Show full text]
  • CHESHIRE. FAR 753 Barber William, Astbury, Congleton Barratt .Ambrose, Brookhouse Green, Ibay!Ey :Mrs
    TRADES DlliECTORY. J CHESHIRE. FAR 753 Barber William, Astbury, Congleton Barratt .Ambrose, Brookhouse green, IBay!ey :Mrs. Mary Ann, The Warren, Barber William, Applet-on, Warrington Smallwo'Jd, Stoke-·on-Trent Gawsworth, Macclesfield Barber William, Buxton stoops. BarraH Clement, Brookhouse green, Beach J. Stockton Heath, Warrington Rainow, Macolesfield Sr.aallwood, Stoke-on-Trent Bean William, Acton, Northwich Barber W. Cheadle Hulme, Stockport Barratt Daniel. Brookhouse green, Beard· Misses Catherine & Ann, Pott; Bard'sley D. Hough hill, Dukinfield Smallwood, Stoke-on-Trent • Shrigley, Macclesfield Bardsley G. Oheadle Hulme, Stockprt Bal"''att J. Bolt's grn.Betchton,Sndbch Beard J. Harrop fold, Harrop,Mcclsfld Bardsley Jas, Heat<m Moor, Stockport Barratt Jn. Lindow common, :Marley, Beard James, Upper end, LymeHand- Bardsley Ralph, Stocks, :Kettleshulme, Wilmslow, Manchester ley, Stockport Macclesfield Barratt J. Love la. Betchton,Sand'bch Beard James, Wrights, Kettleshulme, Bardsley T. Range road, Stalybrid•ge Barratt T.Love la. Betchton, Sandb~h Macclesfield Bardsley W. Cheadle Hulme, Stckpri Barrow Mrs. A. Appleton, Warrington Beard James, jun. Lowe!l" end, Lyme Barff Arthnr, Warburton, Wa"flringtn Barrow Jn.Broom gn. Marthall,Kntsfd Handley, Stockport Barker E. Ivy mnt. Spurstow,Tarprly Ball'row Jonathan, BroadJ lane, Grap- Beard J.Beacon, Compstall, Stockport Barker M~. G. Brereton, Sandbach penhall, Warrington Beard R. Black HI. G~. Tascal,Stckpr1i Barker Henry, Wardle, Nantwich Barrow J. Styal, Handforth, )I'chestr Beard Samuel, High lane, StockpGri Barker Jas. Alsager, Stoke-upon-Trnt Barton Alfred, Roundy lane, .Adling- Be<bbington E. & Son, Olucastle, Malps Barker John, Byley, :Middlewich ton, :Macclesfield Bebbington Oha.rles, Tarporley Barker John, Rushton, Tall'porley Barton C.Brown ho.
    [Show full text]