DOCSLIB.ORG

Hadean-Archean Habitability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hadean-Archean Habitability Hadean - Early Archean: 4.4 to ~ 3.5 Ga How to build a habitable planet? Jack Hills in Australia meta-conglomerat with the oldest minerals on Earth 4.4 Ga Geological time scale 1 : Hadean 2 : Archean Quasi no rock record Rock record First cooling of magma ocean Alteration of basalt to produce serpentinite crust ~ as today on seafloor 146 142 Sm → Nd (T1/2= 103 Ma) silicate/silicate fractionation before total decay of 146Sm ⇒ < 150 Ma, done early Hadean Acasta (Canada) oldest rocks on Earth, end of Hadean, 4.01 Ga Acasta (Canada) oldest rocks on Earth, end of Hadean, 4.01 Ga Acasta (Canada) oldest rocks on Earth, end of Hadean, 4.01 Ga Zircon ages Jack Hills (Australia) meta-conglomerat Archean in age but contains very old zircons Jack Hills (Australia) meta-conglomerat Archean in age but contains very old zircons Jack Hills (Australia) meta-conglomerat Archean in age but contains very old zircons ZrSiO4 1 mm U-Pb age at 4.4 Ga Part of the grain crystalized shortly after end of magma ocean Age distribution of zircons Different dates on different zircon layers Several age populations Oldest Quartz, micas and plagioclase ∂18O in zircons = 5 to 7.4 ‰ Original magma’s = ∂18O ~ 8.5 to 9.5‰ (La/Lu)N zircons⇒(La/Lu)N of magma~ 200 = TTG magma 4.4 Gyr zircons not so different from actual zircons Granitic inclusions present in zircons Quartz, micas and plagioclase ∂18O in zircons = 5 to 7.4 ‰ Original magma’s = ∂18O ~ 8.5 to 9.5‰ (La/Lu)N zircons⇒(La/Lu)N of magma~ 200 = TTG magma 4.4 Gyr zircons not so different from actual zircons Continental crust & oceans in Hadean Granitic inclusions, quartz, micas, plagioclase La/Lu data same as Archean crust Stable continental crust at 4.4 Ga ∂18O indicates that magma interacted with relatively cold water (~ 70 ºC) Liquid water is present Ocean present at 4.4 Ga Looks like Hadean already was habitable “cool early earth” (but was it inhabited?) Implications for the origin of life Early Hadaen (4.568-4.40 No life possible Ga) Magma Ocean Late Hadaen (4.40- 4.00 Conditions favorable Ga) Continental crust + liquid water for life ocean Late heavy bombardment Sterilization ?? Archean (4.00 – 2.50 Ga) Life is present Continents, oceans, plate tectonic, etc. Between 4.0 and 3.8 Ga Late heavy bombardment Between 4.0 and 3.8 Ga Collisions - impacts all over solar system NASA deep impact Hubble ST Fragment G impact Asteroid Eros 1 km 1994 Shoemaker-Levy 9 on Jupiter 33x13x13 km Surface comet Tempel 1 Mare Orientale on the Moon ~ 930 km multi-ring crater 140 km crater on Europa’s ice Collisions - impacts all over solar system NASA deep impact Hubble ST Fragment G impact Asteroid Eros 1 km 1994 Shoemaker-Levy 9 on Jupiter 33x13x13 km Surface comet Tempel 1 Mare Orientale on the Moon ~ 930 km multi-ring crater 140 km crater on Europa’s ice Collisions - impacts all over solar system NASA deep impact Hubble ST Fragment G impact Asteroid Eros 1 km 1994 Shoemaker-Levy 9 on Jupiter 33x13x13 km Surface comet Tempel 1 Mare Orientale on the Moon ~ 930 km multi-ring crater 140 km crater on Europa’s ice Cratering event on solid surface Cratering event on solid surface Cratering event on solid surface Cratering event on solid surface Suevite Cratering event on solid surface Suevite Melt-rock Cratering event on solid surface Suevite Fractured breccia Melt-rock Cratering event on solid surface Shocked minerals Suevite 100 µm Fractured breccia Melt-rock Tektites Cratering event on solid surface 1 cm Shocked minerals Suevite 100 µm Fractured breccia Melt-rock 3.4 Comparative stratigraphy of 3.5 Early Earth and Mare Lavas 3.6 Moon Orientale 3.7 Schrödinger Nulliak Quartzite 3.8 Cluster of Lunar Imbrium Early Amitsôq Gneiss Imbrian craters around Sereniatis LH B Isua Gneiss & Crisium 3.9 4.0 to 3.8 Ga Nectaris 4.0 Oldest Acasta Gneiss impact melt 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Oldest Jack Hill Zircon Anorthosite crust Origin of 4.5 Origin of Moon Earth Late heavy bombardment 2 hypotheses Slow decline Rapid decline but short peak Cool early earth Another ? Archean rate Hadean Archean Arguments for the LHB ~ 3.9 Ga max. age of Lunar impact melt and = shock degassing ages of Lunar and Martian meteorites How to preserve ancient Lunar crust (4.4 Ga old anorthosites) if elevated bombardment in Hadean ? No elevated PGE in Lunar crust contrary to what expect if bombardment constant over 500 Myr (based on available samples) LHB = mass added to the Moon = 2x1013 g/an if extrapolated over whole Hadean > Lunar mass or Moon formed at ~4.1 Ga Terrestrial zircons do not show shock features and formed on a rather cool Earth Traces of LHB on Earth ? No impact marker in Isua (shocked qz, PGE) LHB missed Earth ? Chronology problem: LHB terminated before Isua Traces erased by sedimentation and erosion Search for it on other planets Extrapolate Moon data to Earth Moon: 1700 craters > 20 km, 15 > 300 -1200 km, multiple ring basins Earth: > 10 000 craters > 20 km, 200 > 1000 km, 1 crater 20 km every 104 years Possible consequences Vaporize all of part of oceans, ejection of atmosphere Large basins are formed Volcanism, fracture of oceanic crust Contribution of OM, and noble gases Impact rate and Hadean environments Hadean impact rate is elevated no life possible (hyp. 1) Cool early Earth hypothesis and effect of LHB Low impact rater : life originates in Hadean (hypothesis) Complete extinction during LHB, second start in Archean Major Hadean diversification but mass extinction during LHB, only hyperthermophiles survive on deep ocean floor, and radiate in Archean Major Hadean diversification but mass extinction during LHB, bottleneck effect, new radiation during Archean Origin and cause of LHB Models show that 0.350 to 1.2 Ga after formation of solar system, gas planets migrate towards their current orbits (Jupiter and Saturn inward, Neptune and Uranus outward) Destabilize orbits of asteroids and comets Objects come flying towards inner solar system Impact craters (basins) as a craddle for life ? hypothesis of origin in hydrothermal vents handicaped by high vent Tº > 350 ºC destroys all organic molecules Melt-rock generates hydrothermal circulation Important extension of hydrothermal environments in the crater, life > 106 year, enough to concentrate complex organic molecules Ries (25 km), Manson (35 km) and Puchezh-Katunki (80 km) mineralogy show temperature gradients 400 to < 100°C. Crater contains highly fractured and brechiated rocks, inducing active circulation and micro- environments with exposed mineral surfaces to favorable help catalyze pre-biotic chemistry Complex organic molecules delivered by the projectile Yellowstone Geyser system, complex biosphere Stromatolites first form to recolonize Ries crater lake Do complex organic molecules survive an impact ? Complex organic molecules are destroyed by the high temperatures generated by impact (Chyba et al., 1990) Still valid for asteroidal projectile at ~ 20 km/s Computer model : amino acids survive a cometary impact in the ocean Comet volatile and ice-rich, easily vaporized but the high energy cloud cools rather quickly The lower the impact angle, the lower temperature in the cloud, the higher the survival rate of organic molecules Text Oblique (angle < 15°) impact of a comet in the ocean could spread (> 10%) of its amino acid content Such impacts are rare, but considering impact rate in the Hadean or during LHB, they could have contributed to the concentration/reaction of amino acids in the oceans Association amino acids and altered clay particles (spherules) offer surface for pre-biotic chemistry ? Archean impact rate ? Ejecta layer Location Age (Ga) Thickness cm Acraman Australia 0.59 40 Sudbury Ontario 1.86 25 to 70 Ketilidian Greenland ~ 2.0 100 Dales Gorges Australia 2.48 30 Wittenoom Australia 2.54 100 Revilio Australia 2.56 20 Carawine Australia - S. Africa 2.63 2470 S4 (Barberton) South Africa 3.24 15 S3 (Barberton) South Africa 3.24 200 S2 (Barberton) South Africa 3.26 310 S1 (Barberton) South Africa 3.47 35 KT World 0.065 few cm (to 1 m) Archean and Proterozoic impact layers 1 cm 0.5 mm Impact ejecta layer Wittenoom, Australia Comparison Cretaceous-Tertiary layer 10 km impact 65 Ma ago Archean and Proterozoic impacts Ejecta layers thick and with large impact spherules, PGE anomaly but rare shocked grains Spherule composition originally basaltic, associated with tsunami deposition Large size impacts: > KT boundary, projectiles 20 to 50 km? Oceanic impacts ? Detection coincidence ? impact rate > today, peak in bombardments ? How did life cope with elevated rate ? Geological time scale 1 : Hadean 2 : Archean Quasi no rock record Rock record Archean continental crust: a long record Isua gneiss, sedimentary rocks, Greenland dated at 3.865 Ga Deposited as turbidite Amitsôq gneiss, plutonic rocks, Greenland dated at 3.82 Ga Magmatic origin Current distribution of Archean terranes Gneiss of Shaw (Australia) at 3.45 Ga Swaziland gneiss complex at 3.644 Ga Greenstone belts Banded Iron formation Barberton, komatiite, Gopping Gap, Pilbara, South Africa Australia 3.445 Ga 3.5 Ga Chert, Barberton, 3.445 Ga Pilbara, Australia 3.5 GA Shark bay Australia today Are these equivalent to stromatolites ? Films of Cyanobacteria trapping sedimentary grains in shallow water environments Greenstone belts Tholeitic basalt Grauwackes Kuhmo, Finland Kuhmo, Finland 2.65 Ga 2.65 Ga Late Plutonic rocks Granodiorite of Arola, Finland 2.65 Ga Proportion of Archean terranes Kuhmo, Finland 2.7 Ga Arola, Finland 2.7 Ga Gurur, India 3.1 Ga Komatiites: evidence for a warmer Archean Earth Magmatic rock that does not exist after end of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lunar Impact Crater Identification and Age Estimation with Chang’E
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20215-y OPEN Lunar impact crater identification and age estimation with Chang’E data by deep and transfer learning ✉ Chen Yang 1,2 , Haishi Zhao 3, Lorenzo Bruzzone4, Jon Atli Benediktsson 5, Yanchun Liang3, Bin Liu 2, ✉ ✉ Xingguo Zeng 2, Renchu Guan 3 , Chunlai Li 2 & Ziyuan Ouyang1,2 1234567890():,; Impact craters, which can be considered the lunar equivalent of fossils, are the most dominant lunar surface features and record the history of the Solar System. We address the problem of automatic crater detection and age estimation. From initially small numbers of recognized craters and dated craters, i.e., 7895 and 1411, respectively, we progressively identify new craters and estimate their ages with Chang’E data and stratigraphic information by transfer learning using deep neural networks. This results in the identification of 109,956 new craters, which is more than a dozen times greater than the initial number of recognized craters. The formation systems of 18,996 newly detected craters larger than 8 km are esti- mated. Here, a new lunar crater database for the mid- and low-latitude regions of the Moon is derived and distributed to the planetary community together with the related data analysis. 1 College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, 130061 Changchun, China. 2 Key Laboratory of Lunar and Deep Space Exploration, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China. 3 Key Laboratory of Symbol Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, 130012 Changchun, China. 4 Department of Information Engineering and Computer ✉ Science, University of Trento, I-38122 Trento, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history This timeline of natural history summarizes significant geological and Life timeline Ice Ages biological events from the formation of the 0 — Primates Quater nary Flowers ←Earliest apes Earth to the arrival of modern humans. P Birds h Mammals – Plants Dinosaurs Times are listed in millions of years, or Karo o a n ← Andean Tetrapoda megaanni (Ma). -50 0 — e Arthropods Molluscs r ←Cambrian explosion o ← Cryoge nian Ediacara biota – z ←Earliest animals o ←Earliest plants i Multicellular -1000 — c Contents life ←Sexual reproduction Dating of the Geologic record – P r The earliest Solar System -1500 — o t Precambrian Supereon – e r Eukaryotes Hadean Eon o -2000 — z o Archean Eon i Huron ian – c Eoarchean Era ←Oxygen crisis Paleoarchean Era -2500 — ←Atmospheric oxygen Mesoarchean Era – Photosynthesis Neoarchean Era Pong ola Proterozoic Eon -3000 — A r Paleoproterozoic Era c – h Siderian Period e a Rhyacian Period -3500 — n ←Earliest oxygen Orosirian Period Single-celled – life Statherian Period -4000 — ←Earliest life Mesoproterozoic Era H Calymmian Period a water – d e Ectasian Period a ←Earliest water Stenian Period -4500 — n ←Earth (−4540) (million years ago) Clickable Neoproterozoic Era ( Tonian Period Cryogenian Period Ediacaran Period Phanerozoic Eon Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period Ordovician Period Silurian Period Devonian Period Carboniferous Period Permian Period Mesozoic Era Triassic Period Jurassic Period Cretaceous Period Cenozoic Era Paleogene Period Neogene Period Quaternary Period Etymology of period names References See also External links Dating of the Geologic record The Geologic record is the strata (layers) of rock in the planet's crust and the science of geology is much concerned with the age and origin of all rocks to determine the history and formation of Earth and to understand the forces that have acted upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Bombardment History of the Moon
    EXPLORING THE BOMBARDMENT HISTORY OF THE MOON Community White Paper to the Planetary Decadal Survey, 2011-2020 September 15, 2009 Primary Author: William F. Bottke Center for Lunar Origin and Evolution (CLOE) NASA Lunar Science Institute at the Southwest Research Institute 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: (303) 546-6066 [email protected] Co-Authors/Endorsers: Carlton Allen (NASA JSC) Mahesh Anand (Open U., UK) Nadine Barlow (NAU) Donald Bogard (NASA JSC) Gwen Barnes (U. Idaho) Clark Chapman (SwRI) Barbara A. Cohen (NASA MSFC) Ian A. Crawford (Birkbeck College London, UK) Andrew Daga (U. North Dakota) Luke Dones (SwRI) Dean Eppler (NASA JSC) Vera Assis Fernandes (Berkeley Geochronlogy Center and U. Manchester) Bernard H. Foing (SMART-1, ESA RSSD; Dir., Int. Lunar Expl. Work. Group) Lisa R. Gaddis (US Geological Survey) 1 Jim N. Head (Raytheon) Fredrick P. Horz (LZ Technology/ESCG) Brad Jolliff (Washington U., St Louis) Christian Koeberl (U. Vienna, Austria) Michelle Kirchoff (SwRI) David Kring (LPI) Harold F. (Hal) Levison (SwRI) Simone Marchi (U. Padova, Italy) Charles Meyer (NASA JSC) David A. Minton (U. Arizona) Stephen J. Mojzsis (U. Colorado) Clive Neal (U. Notre Dame) Laurence E. Nyquist (NASA JSC) David Nesvorny (SWRI) Anne Peslier (NASA JSC) Noah Petro (GSFC) Carle Pieters (Brown U.) Jeff Plescia (Johns Hopkins U.) Mark Robinson (Arizona State U.) Greg Schmidt (NASA Lunar Science Institute, NASA Ames) Sen. Harrison H. Schmitt (Apollo 17 Astronaut; U. Wisconsin-Madison) John Spray (U. New Brunswick, Canada) Sarah Stewart-Mukhopadhyay (Harvard U.) Timothy Swindle (U. Arizona) Lawrence Taylor (U. Tennessee-Knoxville) Ross Taylor (Australian National U., Australia) Mark Wieczorek (Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, France) Nicolle Zellner (Albion College) Maria Zuber (MIT) 2 The Moon is unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Earth Elements in Planetary Crusts: Insights from Chemically Evolved Igneous Suites on Earth and the Moon
    minerals Article Rare Earth Elements in Planetary Crusts: Insights from Chemically Evolved Igneous Suites on Earth and the Moon Claire L. McLeod 1,* and Barry J. Shaulis 2 1 Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences, 203 Shideler Hall, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA 2 Department of Geosciences, Trace Element and Radiogenic Isotope Lab (TRaIL), University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-513-529-9662 Received: 5 July 2018; Accepted: 8 October 2018; Published: 16 October 2018 Abstract: The abundance of the rare earth elements (REEs) in Earth’s crust has become the intense focus of study in recent years due to the increasing societal demand for REEs, their increasing utilization in modern-day technology, and the geopolitics associated with their global distribution. Within the context of chemically evolved igneous suites, 122 REE deposits have been identified as being associated with intrusive dike, granitic pegmatites, carbonatites, and alkaline igneous rocks, including A-type granites and undersaturated rocks. These REE resource minerals are not unlimited and with a 5–10% growth in global demand for REEs per annum, consideration of other potential REE sources and their geological and chemical associations is warranted. The Earth’s moon is a planetary object that underwent silicate-metal differentiation early during its history. Following ~99% solidification of a primordial lunar magma ocean, residual liquids were enriched in potassium, REE, and phosphorus (KREEP). While this reservoir has not been directly sampled, its chemical signature has been identified in several lunar lithologies and the Procellarum KREEP Terrane (PKT) on the lunar nearside has an estimated volume of KREEP-rich lithologies at depth of 2.2 × 108 km3.
    [Show full text]
  • Persistence and Origin of the Lunar Core Dynamo
    Persistence and origin of the lunar core dynamo Clément Suaveta,1, Benjamin P. Weissa, William S. Cassatab, David L. Shusterc,d, Jérôme Gattaccecaa,e, Lindsey Chanf, Ian Garrick-Bethellf,g, James W. Headh, Timothy L. Grovea, and Michael D. Fulleri aDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; bChemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550; cDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; dBerkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, CA 94709; eCentre Européen de Recherche et d’Enseignement des Géosciences de l’Environnement, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Aix-Marseille 3, 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France; fDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064; gSchool of Space Research, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 446–701, South Korea; hDepartment of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912; and iHawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822 Edited by Neta A. Bahcall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved April 16, 2013 (received for review January 22, 2013) The lifetime of the ancient lunar core dynamo has implications for its 10017 as a constraint on the lunar dynamo. Instead, these authors power source and the mechanism of field generation. Here, we report relied on their analyses of 10049, whose subsamples were found to analyses of two 3.56-Gy-old mare basalts demonstrating that they carry a unidirectional magnetization (17) with a seemingly weak were magnetized in a stable and surprisingly intense dynamo mag- paleointensity (4–10 μT). However, our reanalysis of their data netic field of at least ∼13 μT.
    [Show full text]
  • South Pole-Aitken Basin
    Feasibility Assessment of All Science Concepts within South Pole-Aitken Basin INTRODUCTION While most of the NRC 2007 Science Concepts can be investigated across the Moon, this chapter will focus on specifically how they can be addressed in the South Pole-Aitken Basin (SPA). SPA is potentially the largest impact crater in the Solar System (Stuart-Alexander, 1978), and covers most of the central southern farside (see Fig. 8.1). SPA is both topographically and compositionally distinct from the rest of the Moon, as well as potentially being the oldest identifiable structure on the surface (e.g., Jolliff et al., 2003). Determining the age of SPA was explicitly cited by the National Research Council (2007) as their second priority out of 35 goals. A major finding of our study is that nearly all science goals can be addressed within SPA. As the lunar south pole has many engineering advantages over other locations (e.g., areas with enhanced illumination and little temperature variation, hydrogen deposits), it has been proposed as a site for a future human lunar outpost. If this were to be the case, SPA would be the closest major geologic feature, and thus the primary target for long-distance traverses from the outpost. Clark et al. (2008) described four long traverses from the center of SPA going to Olivine Hill (Pieters et al., 2001), Oppenheimer Basin, Mare Ingenii, and Schrödinger Basin, with a stop at the South Pole. This chapter will identify other potential sites for future exploration across SPA, highlighting sites with both great scientific potential and proximity to the lunar South Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • 405 01.Ps, Page 1-22 @ Normalize ( 405 01.Qxd )
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 405 2006 The record of impact processes on the early Earth: A review of the first 2.5 billion years Christian Koeberl† Department of Geological Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria ABSTRACT Collisions and impact processes have been important throughout the history of the solar system, including that of the Earth. Small bodies in the early solar system, the planetesimals, grew through collisions, ultimately forming the planets. The Earth started growing ca. 4.56 Ga in this way. Its early history was dominated by violent impacts and collisions, of which we only have circumstantial evidence. The Earth was still growing and had reached ~70%–80% of its present mass when at ca. 4.5 Ga a Mars- sized protoplanet collided with Earth, leading to the formation of the moon—at least according to the currently most popular hypothesis of lunar origin. After its forma- tion, the moon was subjected to intense post-accretionary bombardment between ca. 4.5 and 3.9 Ga. In addition, there is convincing evidence that the Moon experienced an interval of intense bombardment with a maximum at ca. 3.85 ± 0.05 Ga; subsequent mare plains as old as 3.7 or 3.8 Ga are preserved. It is evident that if a late heavy bom- bardment occurred on the Moon, the Earth must have been subjected to an impact flux at least as intense as that recorded on the Moon. The consequences for the Earth must have been devastating, although the exact consequences are the subject of debate (total remelting of the crust versus minimal effects on possibly emerging life forms).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Archean Asteroid Impacts on Earth
    dpg15 v.2007/06/04 Prn:6/06/2007; 11:09 F:dpg15041.tex; VTEX/JOL p. 1 aid: 15085 pii: S0166-2635(07)15085-4 docsubty: REV Earth’s Oldest Rocks Edited by Martin J. van Kranendonk, R. Hugh Smithies and Vickie C. Bennett Developments in Precambrian Geology, Vol. 15 (K.C. Condie, Series Editor) 1 © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2635(07)15085-4 1 Chapter 8.5 1 2 2 3 3 4 EARLY ARCHEAN ASTEROID IMPACTS ON EARTH: 4 5 STRATIGRAPHIC AND ISOTOPIC AGE CORRELATIONS 5 6 6 7 AND POSSIBLE GEODYNAMIC CONSEQUENCES 7 8 8 9 ANDREW GLIKSON 9 10 Department of Earth and Marine Science and Planetary Science Institute, Australian 10 11 National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 8.5-1. INTRODUCTION 15 16 16 17 The heavily cratered surfaces of the terrestrial planets and moons testify to their long- 17 18 term reshaping by asteroid and comet impacts and related structural and melting processes. 18 19 Following accretion of Earth from the solar disc at ca. 4.56 Ga (see Taylor, this volume), 19 20 the Earth–Moon system is believed to have originated by a collision between a Mars- 20 21 size planet and Earth, followed by episodic bombardment by asteroids and comets, with a 21 22 peak documented at ca. 3.95–3.85 Ga – the Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB) – recorded 22 23 on the Moon, but not on Earth due to the paucity and high grade metamorphic state of 23 24 terrestrial rocks of this age (Wilhelm, 1987; Ryder, 1990, 1991, 1997; see Iizuka et al., 24 25 this volume).
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Impact Craters Identification and Age Estimation with Chang'e Data
    LETTE Lunar impact craters identification and age estimation with Chang'E data by deep and transfer learning Chen Yang1,2*, Haishi Zhao3, Lorenzo Bruzzone4, Jon Atli Benediktsson5, Yanchun Liang3, Bin Liu2, Xingguo Zeng2, Renchu Guan3*, Chunlai Li2* & Ziyuan Ouyang 2,6 Impact craters, as "lunar fossils", are the most dominant lunar recognized and age constrained craters are not adequate enough to surface features and occupy most of the Moon’s surface. Their reveal their evolutionary history and process. formation and evolution record the history of the Solar System. Lunar craters have the same genesis, i.e., impacts create craters that Sixty years of triumphs in the lunar exploration projects look similar in a near-circular depression structure. This is the main accumulated a large amount of lunar data. Currently, there are basis for the identification of craters. Different experiences, i.e., the 9137 existing recognized craters. However, only 1675 of them have formation and long-term alteration, lead to craters having a different been determined age, which is obviously not satisfactory to reveal complex morphology. Typical characteristics can demonstrate the evolution of the Moon. Identifying craters is a challenging task differences in orders of magnitude in size of the diameters, e.g. the due to their enormous difference in size, large variations in shape largest craters have a diameter of a few hundred kilometers, whereas and vast presence. Furthermore, estimating the age of craters is the smallest ones have a diameter of a few meters. They also show extraordinarily difficult due to their complex and different large variations in shape due to an overlap with other craters (see morphologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Impacts on Archaean Tectonics C
    https://doi.org/10.1130/G46533.1 Manuscript received 20 May 2019 Revised manuscript received 17 October 2019 Manuscript accepted 23 October 2019 © 2019 Geological Society of America. For permission to copy, contact [email protected]. The role of impacts on Archaean tectonics C. O’Neill1, S. Marchi2, W. Bottke2 and R. Fu3 1 Planetary Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia 2 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA 3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA ABSTRACT intense impacting during the waning stages of Field evidence from the Pilbara craton (Australia) and Kaapvaal craton (South Africa) accretion. indicate that modern tectonic processes may have been operating at ca. 3.2 Ga, a time also Lowe et al. (2003, 2014) noted that the for- associated with a high density of preserved Archaean impact indicators. Recent work has sug- mation of the spherule beds in the Barberton gested a causative association between large impacts and tectonic processes for the Hadean. greenstone belt at ca. 3.2 Ga marked a transition However, impact flux estimates and spherule bed characteristics suggest impactor diam- in tectonic style. The underlying Onverwacht eters of <100 km at ca. 3.5 Ga, and it is unclear whether such impacts could perturb the Group represents a typical Paleoarchean anoro- global tectonic system. In this work, we develop numerical simulations of global tectonism genic volcanic regime dominated by komatiitic with impacting effects, and simulate the evolution of these models throughout the Archaean and basaltic volcanism and chemo-biological for given impact fluxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Genes, Memes, Culture, and Mental Illness [email protected] Hoyle Leigh
    Genes, Memes, Culture, and Mental Illness [email protected] Hoyle Leigh Genes, Memes, Culture, and Mental Illness Toward an Integrative Model 123 [email protected] Hoyle Leigh University of California San Francisco California USA [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-5670-5 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-5671-2 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-5671-2 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2010921915 © Hoyle Leigh, 2010 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) [email protected] For Vinnie, My Partner in this Epigenetic Journey Of Genes, Memes, Culture, and much more.... [email protected] [email protected] Preface How do genes interact with the environment? How does the environment actually enter the body to affect the genes? When we perceive the environment, bits of infor- mation are encoded within the brain as memory, which consists of a series of neural connections, a brain code (see Chapter 9).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Lunar Geological Time Scale and the Geological Evolution of the Moon
    50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2132) 1741.pdf A NEW LUNAR GEOLOGICAL TIME SCALE AND THE GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MOON. X. Z. Ding1 and K. J. Xu2, 1Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Baiwanzhuang Road, Beijing 100037, China, [email protected], 2Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Baiwanzhuang Road, Beijing 100037, China, [email protected]. Based on the researth of geological evolution of For instance, the age of strong impact event of Imbrian sinus iridum area of the Moon, we compiled a tentative Period is 3.92 Ga. This conclusion was commonly ac- geological map at1:2.5 M of the Sinus Iridum area, set cepted at the 32nd Lunar and Planetary Science Confer- up a new time scale(Table 1), and discussed the evolu- ence in Huston in 2010, so as to change the traditional tional history of the lunar regional geology. The geo- cognition that this event occurred at 3.85 Ga, thus mak- logical times of the Moon is devided into pre-Imbrian ing a significant contribution to the study of the early (PI), consisting of the pre-Nectarian(PN) and the Nec- lunar evolution history(Liu et al., 2011). In the same tarian(N); the Imbrian(I), consisting of the Early Imbri- way, SIMS Pb-Pb dating was conducted on zircons in an (I1) and Late Imbrian (I2); the Eratosthenian (E) and impact melt breccia and fine-grained matrix of the most the Copernican (C). K-rich KREEP of lunar meteorite SaU 169 by Lin et As regards the age of Mare Imbrian, Liu et al.(2012), The comprehensive petrographic, mineral al(2010) performed high-precision zircon SHRIMP chemistry and SIMS study analyses consider the main dating for the samples of impact melting debris in front age peak at 3921±3Ma and the smaller one at of the southern part of the study area obtained by Apol- 4016±6Ma represent the latter crystallizing age of lo 12, 14 and lunar meteorites SaU169, and accurately KREEP magma and the age of a catastrophic shock ascertained the ages of some early events on the Moon.
    [Show full text]