DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 106 Historic Resources Report Camp Whitsett, Sequoia National Forest Forest Road 22S22, Kernville, CA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 106 Historic Resources Report Camp Whitsett, Sequoia National Forest Forest Road 22S22, Kernville, CA Section 106 Historic Resources Report Camp Whitsett, Sequoia National Forest Forest Road 22S22, Kernville, CA 1 April 2011 Prepared by: Prepared for: Boy Scouts of America, Western Los Angeles County Council 16525 Sherman Way, Unit C-8 Van Nuys, CA 91406 Executive Summary This report was prepared for the purpose of assisting the Boy Scouts of America, Western Los Angeles County Council and the Sequoia National Forest in their compliance with Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966, in connection with proposed changes to the dam on Lake Ida on the grounds of Camp Whitsett, lo- cated on Forest Road 22S22 in the Sequoia National Forest, approximately 20 miles north of Kernville, Tulare County, California. The proposed undertaking includes repair to the gate stem and operator for the right outlet gate; addition of stem support on middle horizontal steel member of gate frame for both gates; removal of loose gunite and concrete on dam crest and repair with grout or concrete; the filling of two core holes on crest with grout; removal of silt at upstream abutments, inspection of intersection of the gunite and the bed- rock and repair of any cracks or separation. [Figure 1] This report assesses the historical and architectural significance of potentially significant historic properties in accordance with the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Criteria for Evaluation. This report was prepared by San Buenaventura Research Associates of Santa Paula, California, Judy Triem, His- torian; and Mitch Stone, Preservation Planner, for the Boy Scouts of America, Western Los Angeles County Council, and is based on a field investigation and research conducted in January through March 2011. The conclusions contained herein represent the professional opinions of San Buenaventura Research Associates, and are based on the factual data available at the time of its preparation, the application of the appropriate federal regulations, and best professional practices. Summary of Findings The dam and lake appear to retain sufficient integrity to be eligible for listing on the NRHP under Criterion B and therefore should be regarded as historic properties for the purposes of Section 106. The remaining eight buildings, including three residential cabins, the Commissary/Kitchen, the Health Lodge, the Trading Post, the tent cabin and Handicraft Lodge that may be eligible as a NRHP district, have not retained sufficient integrity to support NRHP eligibility. Report Contents 1. Administrative Setting 1 3. Area of Potential Effect 2 4. Description of Location of Undertaking 2 5. Historical Setting 2 Historical Context William Paul Whitsett 6. Potential Historic Resources 5 Overall Setting Buildings and Structures Constructed 1949-1961 Buildings/Structures Constructed After 1961 7. Eligibility of Historic Resources Within the APE 9 National Register of Historic Places: Significance, Eligibility and Integrity Integrity Discussion Properties Less Than 50 Years of Age Conclusions 8. Consultation With Local Organizations 12 9. Selected Sources 12 Figure 1. Project Location [Source: USGS 7.5’ Quadrangles: Sentinel Peak, CA, 1987; Johnsondale, CA, 1986] 1. Administrative Setting Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966 requires that federally-funded agencies “...take into ac- count the effect of [an] undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register.” The National Park Service promulgates the criteria and stan- dards for determining eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); the procedures for deter- mining adverse effects on historic resources are contained in the Federal Register at 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties). The criteria for determining eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) have been developed by the National Park Service. Eligible properties include districts, sites, buildings and structures, A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that rep- resent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. The minimum age criterion for the NRHP is 50 years. Properties less than 50 years old may be eligible for list- ing on the NRHP if they can be regarded as “exceptional,” as defined by the NRHP procedures. (Chapter 11, Title 14, §4842(d)(2)) According to the NRHP standards, in order for a property which is found to significant under one or more of the criteria to be considered eligible for listing, the “essential physical features” which define the property’s significance must be present. The standard for determining if a property’s essential physical features exist is known as integrity, which is defined as “the ability of a property to convey its significance.” The integrity evaluation is broken down into seven “aspects.” The seven aspects of integrity are: Location (the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred); Design (the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property); Setting (the physical environment of a historic property); Materials (the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property); Workmanship (the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period of history or prehistory); Feeling (a property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time), and; Association (the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property). The relevant aspects of integrity depend upon the NRHP criteria applied to a property. For example, a property nominated under Criterion A (events), would be likely to convey its significance primarily through integrity of location, setting and association. A property nominated solely under Criterion C (design) would usually rely primarily upon integrity of design, materials and workmanship. Further, according to the NRHP guidelines, the integrity of a property must be evaluated at the time the evaluation of eligibility is conducted. Integrity as- sessments cannot be based on speculation with respect to historic fabric and architectural elements which may exist but are not visible to the evaluator, or on restorations which are theoretically possible but which have not occurred. (CCR §4852 (c)) The criteria for determining adverse effects on historic resources are established by the National Historic Pres- ervation Act of 1966, and by standards published by the National Park Service in connection with the National Section 106 Historic Resources Report Camp Whitsett, Sequoia National Forest Register of Historic Places. According to the Act, “An adverse effect is found when an undertaking may alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property’s location, design, set- ting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association. Consideration shall be given to all qualifying character- istics of a historic property, including those that may have been identified subsequent to the original evalua- tion of the property’s eligibility for the National Register. Adverse effects may include reasonably foreseeable Effects caused by the undertaking that may occur later in time, be farther removed in distance or be cumula- tive.” (36 CFR 800.5 (a)(1)) 3. Area of Potential Effect The Area of Potential Effect (APE) includes the lake, dam and surrounding campground. 4. Description of Location of Undertaking The dam is located on Lake Ida within the Camp Whitsett Boy Scouts of America Camp, an 88 acre site within the Sequoia National Forest. Nobe Young Creek and its tributary Bone Creek join above this location, the dam on Nobe Young Creek creating Lake Ida. Nobe Young Creek continues below the dam. Docks, a boat house, a campfire circle (amphitheater) and campsites are located on and near the lake. Camp buildings are widely scattered across the hillsides adjacent to the lake. The grounds are heavily wooded, primarily with Jeffrey Pines. 5. Historical Setting Historical Context On July 1, 1947 the U.S. Forest Service leased approximately 80 acres in the Sequoia National Forest to the San Fernando Valley Boy Scouts. This land became Camp Whitsett, which opened as a camp that summer. The camp was named for prominent San Fernando Valley businessman William P. Whitsett, the founder of the community of Van Nuys, and Chair of the Metropolitan Water District of Los Angeles. The prior year, the Boy Scout Council asked Whitsett to serve on their board, but he declined because of his position with the MWD. Instead, Whitsett offered to donate a lot on Van Nuys Boulevard to the Boy Scouts, with the understanding that the organization would build on the parcel and use the income to improve a camp. He also suggested as the camp’s location the Kern River Canyon section of the Sequoia National Forest, the destination of many of Whitsett’s own camping and fishing trips during the 1920s and 1930s. The Boy Scouts made their first visit to the site during the summer of 1946 and began preparations. Whitsett joined the board after his retirement from the MWD in 1947, and thereafter became fully involved with the camp’s development. It was soon realized that in addition to fishing in the streams running through the camp the scouts would benefit from being able to swim, boat and learn water safety through rescue work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • L a County Sheriff Jim Mcdonnell Public Safety Challenges for 2018: *Crime *Counter-Terrorism *Mental Illness *Opioids *Recruitment of Officers
    L A County Sheriff Jim McDonnell Public Safety Challenges for 2018: *Crime *Counter-Terrorism *Mental Illness *Opioids *Recruitment of Officers COMMUNITY MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2017 - 7:15 PM NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL • RIVERSIDE & WOODMAN, SHERMAN OAKS Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell will be our guest speaker on Wednesday evening October 18, 2017. Many of us are very familiar with Sheriff McDonnell because he has spoken at previous Meetings as the second in command to Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton. In 2010, he left the Los Angeles Police Department to become Chief of Police in the City of Long Beach. In 2014, he was elected as Los Angeles County Sheriff. Chief McDonnell brings decades of experience and expertise to the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. He is well-respected within the community and among law enforcement agencies. McDonnell has served as President of the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs’ Association as well as California Peace Officers’ Association. He is committed to keeping our streets safe while being transparent and proactively addressing the root causes of all crimes. Learn how Chief McDonnell deals with the challenges of overseeing 18,000 employees and what is being done to solve admitted problems within the Sheriff’s Department. Chief McDonnell will also discuss the controversy over the Sheriff’s Department’s use of drones. He will explain how the Sheriff’s Department is prepared if a Las Vegas shooting were to occur in Los Angeles. How will immigration rules from Washington, D.C. impact policing in our communities? Jules Feir announces that Poquito Mas will be our Restaurant of the Month.
    [Show full text]
  • City of West Hollywood Appendix J
    R2, R3, R4 Multi-Family Survey Report City of West Hollywood Appendix J: 1986-87 Survey Context, prepared by Johnson Heumann Research Associates Appendices November 2008 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP Architects, Planners & Conservators, Inc. when a small group of citizens formed the West Hollywood Incorporation Committee. By November of that year, studies by the Local Agency Formation Commission confirmed that incorporation was indeed economically feasible. Tenants led by the Coalition for Economic Survival, homeowners concerned with planning issues and the gay community were among the leading advocates of cityhoog. Formal application was made on April 4, 1984. On November 4, 1984, by a 4:1 favorable margin, the voters approved incorporation . One of the new city's first tasks was to begin to draft a General Plan , the land use policy document for the municipality required· by State law. In January of 1985, the city began the process of preparing the Plan, noting that the physical environment, social character and quality of life within the City would be influenced by the General Plan. It was a stated goal to link land use and urban design, emphasizing the relationship between parcels and uses throughout the city. A reduction of density from those outlined in the West Hollywood Community Plan, .---- prepared before incorporated by the County of Los Angeles, was planned. As an i ntegral part of this planning process. the city of West Hollywood applied for c survey grant from the State Off ice of Historic Preservation in November of 1985 . 1.2 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY The area now known as West Hollywood has played a key role in t h e development of Los Angeles County west of Los Angeles .
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura Blvd
    13715 ENTURA VSHERMAN OAKS, CA BRANDON MICHAELS GROUP INVESTMENT ADVISORS BRANDON MICHAELS Senior Managing Director Investments Senior Director, National Retail Group Property Overview Tel: (818) 212-2794 [email protected] 1 License: CA #01434685 BEN BROWNSTEIN Senior Associate Associate Member, National Retail Group Tel: (818) 212-2812 [email protected] Investment Highlights License: CA #02012808 2 13715 ENTURA VSHERMAN OAKS, CA 3 Financials BRANDON MICHAELS GROUP 4 Area Overview 16830 Ventura Blvd. Suite 100, Encino, CA 91436 www.marcusmillichap.com 2 3 A MIXED-USE RETAIL/OFFICE PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG WORLD RENOWNED VENTURA BOULEVARD IN THE AFFLUENT, HIGH-DEMAND SUBMARKET OF SHERMAN OAKS, CA 13715 Marcus & Millichap has been selected to exclusively market for sale 13715 Ventura Boulevard, a mixed- use retail/office property located along Ventura Boulevard in the affluent, high-demand submarket ENTURA of Sherman Oaks, CA. 13715 Ventura Boulevard is ideally located along a prime stretch of Ventura SHERMAN OAKS, CA Boulevard just West of Woodman Avenue and East of Hazeltine Avenue on the north side of the street. The immediate area has undergone significant growth and is home to a number of restaurants, local and national retailers, and a plethora of other uses which make this one of the most desirable locales in the V San Fernando Valley. 13715 Ventura has two ground level storefront retail units averaging 1,278 SF with excellent visibility and frontage along Ventura Boulevard, and a 1,221 square foot second story office unit that was previously an apartment unit. All leases are currently on a month to month basis, creating a unique opportunity for an investor who is looking to re-position a well-located asset along prestigious Ventura Boulevard, or an Owner-User Buyer who can utilize a portion or all of the building for their specific use.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources July 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTOR 1 INTRODUCTION 1 THEME: WILMINGTON, 1862-1909 4 THEME: SAN PEDRO, 1882-1909 30 THEME: HOLLYWOOD, 1887-1910 56 THEME: SAWTELLE, 1896-1918 82 THEME: EAGLE ROCK, 1886-1923 108 THEME: HYDE PARK, 1887-1923 135 THEME: VENICE, 1901-1925 150 THEME: WATTS, 1902-1926 179 THEME: BARNES CITY, 1919-1926 202 THEME: TUJUNGA, 1888-1932 206 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPY 232 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Pre-consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 PREFACE This historic context is a component of Los Angeles’ citywide historic context statement and provides guidance to field surveyors in identifying and evaluating potential historic resources relating to Pre- Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles. Refer to www.HistoricPlacesLA.org for information on designated resources associated with this context as well as those identified through SurveyLA and other surveys. CONTRIBUTOR Daniel Prosser is a historian and preservation architect. He holds an M.Arch. from Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in history from Northwestern University. Before retiring, Prosser was the Historic Sites Architect for the Kansas State Historical Society. INTRODUCTION The “Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles” context examines those communities that were at one time independent, self-governing cities. These include (presented here as themes): Wilmington, San Pedro, Hollywood, Sawtelle, Eagle Rock, Hyde Park, Venice, Watts, Barnes City, and Tujunga. This context traces the history of each of these cities (up to the point of consolidation with the City of Los Angeles), identifying important individuals and patterns of settlement and development, and then links the events and individuals to extant historic resources (individual resources and historic districts).
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Anniversary Commemorative Book
    I \ . T r a 11-. po1 l.tll. ·, 11 1 \11 d 111 r i1~ l ' .n -. 1t"1- •l, •~(-1111111~ \1,. ,,.,.(1",' ('1") / ""I 11 1\f' l ll OrH tl. , Bno k HE -til 1 . \ 1111i 1· 1·r,al\ - 1 51 L675 A42 o,2 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 4th Anniversary Commemorative Book April 1997 2 April 18, 1997 Los Angeles County Dear Employee, Metropolitan Transportation As we pause to celebrate the fourth anniversary of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Authority, we should take a moment to reflect on the men and women who contributed their time and talents over the past 123 years to establish and improve public transportation in Los Angeles. One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA The summary of transit history, by MTA Librarian Dorothy Gray, reminds us of the long 90012 distinguished history ofthe MTA·s predecessor agencies. Beginning with the first horse­ drawn rail cars on Main Street, our region's transportation system has evolved through 213.9 22.6000 succeeding eras of interurban railways, Red Cars, Yellow Cars, gasoline and diesel buses, to today's high-tech compressed natural gas coaches and the Metro Blue, Red and Green lines. These ever-improving modes of transportation were planned, built and operated by people with a vision of the future of Los Angeles. They knew that the gro.vth and prosperity of our region was dependent upon the development of a transportation network that would be easily accessible, efficient and cost-effective. As employees of the MTA, we must continue to build on that legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan
    Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan April 2005 Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Steering Committee Ann Dalkey and Travis Longcore, Co-Chairs Editor’s Note This document includes text prepared by several authors. Julie Stephenson and Dr. Antony Orme completed research and text on geomorphology (Appendix A). Dr. Ronald Davidson researched and reported South Bay history (Appendix B). Sarah Casia and Leann Ortmann completed biological fieldwork, supervised by Dr. Rudi Mattoni. All photographs © Travis Longcore. GreenInfo Network prepared maps under the direction of Aubrey Dugger (http://www.greeninfo.org). You may download a copy of this plan from: http://www.urbanwildlands.org/bbrp.html This plan was prepared with funding from California Proposition 12, administered by the California Coastal Conservancy and the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission through a grant to the Los Angeles Conservation Corps and The Urban Wildlands Group. Significant additional funding was provided by a grant from the City of Redondo Beach. Preferred Citation Longcore, T. (ed.). 2005. Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan. Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Steering Committee, Redondo Beach, California. 2 Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iii Introduction .........................................................................................................................5 Goals.....................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • HSUMD Earns Historic Preservation Award
    Upper Mojave Desert P. O. Box 2001, Ridgecrest, CA 93556 Vol. 23 No. 11 December 2008 COME ONE — COME ALL DEC. 16 7 P.M. Please note: half an hour earlier than usual HOLIDAY PARTY TIME at the Historical Society of the Upper Mojave Desert! With your presence, the Historic USO Building will be rocking! " BRING your favorite dessert to share with everyone. We’ll furnish the hot cider, water, and coffee. " Enjoy the fellowship and fun! " Have fun listening to Charlotte Goodson read something special! " Win door prizes! " Play a historical questions game! " Listen to the Immanual Baptist Choir! This special event, our December meeting, is being arranged by Hospitality Chair Jim Lamb and Program Chair Jim Kenney Last year’s HSUMD Christmas tree Photo illustration by Liz Babcock There’s Still Time for You To Be a Brick Santa! Help the USO Building restoration You will have an opportunity to review and approve effort by buying your favorite gift what you want the brick to say before it is engraved. recipient a special commemorative Please print your brick’s message on the appropriate part brick or give yourself a brick for of the form below, then send this entire page to Histori- the holidays! cal Society of the Upper Mojave Desert, P. O. Box You can get a 4- x 8-inch brick 2001, Ridgecrest, CA 93556, with your check made out for $100 or an 8- x 8-inch brick for to HSUMD. $250. The 4x8 brick has space for Questions? Call Andrew Sound at 371-1795 or e-mail three lines, with 21 characters per him at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • GC 1323 Historic Sites Surveys Repository
    GC 1323 Historic Sites Surveys Repository: Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Span Dates: 1974-1996, bulk 1974-1978 Conditions Governing Use: Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder Conditions Governing Access: Research is by appointment only Source: Surveys were compiled by Tom Sitton, former Head of History Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Background: In 1973, the History Department of the Natural History Museum was selected to conduct surveys of Los Angeles County historic sites as part of a statewide project funded through the National Preservation Act of 1966. Tom Sitton was appointed project facilitator in 1974 and worked with various historical societies to complete survey forms. From 1976 to 1977, the museum project operated through a grant awarded by the state Office of Historic Preservation, which allowed the hiring of three graduate students for the completion of 500 surveys, taking site photographs, as well as to help write eighteen nominations for the National Register of Historic Places (three of which were historic districts). The project concluded in 1978. Preferred Citation: Historic Sites Surveys, Seaver Center for Western History Research, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History Special Formats: Photographs Scope and Content: The Los Angeles County historic site surveys were conducted from 1974 through 1978. Compilation of data for historic sites continued beyond 1978 until approximately 1996, by way of Sitton's efforts to add application sheets prepared for National Register of Historic Places nominations. These application forms provide a breadth of information to supplement the data found on the original survey forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Reseda-West Van Nuys Community Plan Area
    Historic Resources Survey Report Reseda-West Van Nuys Community Plan Area Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Inc. Pasadena, CA July 31, 2015 Table of Contents Project Overview 1 SurveyLA Methodology Summary 1 Project Team 3 Survey Area 3 Designated Resources 13 Community Plan Area Survey Methodology 15 Summary of Findings 17 Summary of Property Types 17 Summary of Contexts and Themes 19 Selected Bibliography 34 Appendices Appendix A: Individual Resources Appendix B: Non-Parcel Resources Appendix C: Historic Districts and Planning District Project Overview This Historic Resources Survey Report (“Survey Report”) has been completed on behalf of the City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning’s Office of Historic Resources (OHR) for the SurveyLA historic resources survey of the Reseda-West Van Nuys Community Plan Area (CPA). This project was undertaken from June 2014 to July 2015 by Architectural Resources Group (ARG). This Survey Report provides a summary of the work completed, including a description of the Survey Area; an overview of the field methodology; a summary of relevant contexts, themes and property types; and complete lists of all recorded resources. This Survey Report is intended to be used in conjunction with the SurveyLA Field Results Master Report (“Master Report”), which provides a detailed discussion of SurveyLA methodology and explains the terms used in this report and associated appendices. The Master Report, Survey Report, and Appendices are available online at www.surveyla.org. SurveyLA Methodology Summary Below is a brief summary of SurveyLA methodology. Refer to the Master Report discussed above for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • Recasting Los Angeles' Relationship to Modernity
    The Beach versus “Blade Runner”: Recasting Los Angeles’ Relationship to Modernity Ronald A. Davidson n a quiet side street in Venice, California, three blocks from the bustling Ocean Front Walk, a mural that few tourists are likely to see offers a bitter commentary on the historic-geographic dynamics Oof the landscape they have come to visit (Figure 1). This is the landscape of Los Angeles’ “first” public park, the beach. Painted in 1975 (and re-furbished in 1997 by the community-based arts center SPARC (Social and Public Art Re- source Center), the now graffiti-covered mural portrays a bulldozer and an excavator demolishing a simple, shore-adjacent cottage. As the house col- lapses a woman is revealed sitting cross-legged on the floor inside, making the viewer not only witness to a scene of violence but also an inadvertent peeping tom. The woman clutches her blue-scarfed head in fear and bewil- derment while her cat leaps for safety. In the left foreground a group of Venetians protests the demolition, one by spray painting “Stop the PIG!” on a wall. “The People of Venice vs. the Developers” was painted when both property condemnations by the city and gentrification had begun to force out Figure 1. “The People of Venice versus the Developers” (the Venetian spray-painting the words “STOP THE PIG” not seen, left). Photograph by Yoko Nasu. Ronald A. Davidson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Geography at California State University, Northridge. Historical Geography Volume 35(2007): 56-79. ©2007 Geoscience Publications. The Beach versus “Blade Runner” 57 the area’s low-income, retired and (most famously) beat residents in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideal Owner/User Or Investment Industrial Complex Twin Buildings
    LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION 18,616 SQUARE FEET NEAR ROSCOE & CANOGA 8023-8033 REMMET CANOGA PARK, CALIFORNIA 91304 OFFERED AT: $5,495,000 IDEAL OWNER/USER OR INVESTMENT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TWIN BUILDINGS ABUNDANT PARKING FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: BRAD WISEMAN DAVID WATKINS 818-880-9900 818-970-2946 PINNACLE COMMERCIAL The information contained herein is deemed reliable. Neither owner or agent herein makes any warranties or rep- resentations as the the accuracy of the information contained herein. Buyer is strongly advised to verify all infor- mation pertaining to this offering with the consultation of applicable professionals (property inspectors, account- ants, attorneys, etc.) OFFERING SUMMARY Location Prime Industrial Complex 8023-8033 Remmet Canoga Park, CA 91304 IDEAL OWNER USER OR INVESTOR Offering Summary 2/Twin Building Industrial Complex Price $5,495,000 Prime Canoga Park Location Proforma N.O.I. $198,550 Just South of Roscoe Boulevard Capitalization Rate 3.61% Price Per Square Foot $295 Between Topanga & Canoga Net Rentable Area 18,616 Low Maintenance Year Built 2006 Ample Parking Front & Rear Lot Size (Acres) .68 4 Loading Doc Doors Parking (2.74/1000 Ratio) 20 FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: BRAD WISEMAN DAVID WATKINS 818-880-9900 818-943-6167 PINNACLE COMMERCIAL The information contained herein is deemed reliable. Neither owner or agent herein makes any warranties or rep- resentations as the the accuracy of the information contained herein. Buyer is strongly advised to verify all infor- mation pertaining to this offering with the consultation of applicable professionals (property inspectors, account- ants, attorneys, etc.) AGOURA HILLS—AREA INFORMATION CANOGA PARK Canoga Park is a neighborhood in the San Fernando Valley region of Los Angeles, California, United States.
    [Show full text]
  • WOW! What a Group! Lee and Honorary Mayor Dennis Zine
    Local Two Major Volunteer Ventura Blvd. to be Eyesores to Honored Be Developed See Page 3 See 11 See Page 16 Volume 37, Number 52 Serving Warner Center Since 1982 February 20, 2020 News***When strippingin Brief in - take out date line below Valley VantageWhat’s - we’re getting in double a Name?lines!!! Part II By Christopher James may be relatively new, its Amazon 4-Star Store Opening at Topanga I hope you all enjoyed my travel pathway was not. Amazon will previous article on how some of the Local Native open one of the Valley’s neighborhoods got their American Indian tribes “4-Star” stores at names. As a follow up, I’d like to had been traveling Westfield Topanga explain the origins of the names east and west across next week. The L A S V Iof someR ofG our E most, N and Eleast, S the AValley Non aD path store will feature travelled streets and boulevards. roughly mirroring both products from Let’s start with the big one, Ventura Blvd and the the most popular Ventura Blvd. As a child growing “new” freeway for over categories up in Woodland Hills in the 70’s 7,000 years. It was, on Amazon. I remember my grandparents and still is, simply the ALABASASmarveling at how quicklyNTERPRISE they most direct and quickest Ccom, including E Volume 49, Number 52 Serving Calabasas Since 1963 February 20, 2020 devices, consumer were able to get to our home on way. The first Europeans electronics, kitchen, those weekends when they would to use the route were home, toys, books, make the trek from Arcadia.
    [Show full text]