DOCSLIB.ORG

St. Lawrence Waterway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
St. Lawrence Waterway 67~~OONQRERS SENATE DOOUMENT 8d Session } No. 114 ST. LAWRENCE WATERWAY MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITEDSTATES TRANSMITTING A LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY OF STATE SUBMITTING THE REPORT OF THE INTERNA- TIONAL JOINT COMMiSSION CONCERNING THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE ST. LAWRENCE RIVER BETWEENMONTREAL AND LAKEONTARIO FOR NAVIGATION AND POWER JANUARY16,1922.-Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations WASHINGTON GOVERNMENTPRINTING OFFICE 1922 SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 215. 8UBMITrBD BY KB. KELLOGG. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES, January 18, lOSS. Resolved, That the messRO'efrom the President of the United Sta.tes,transmitting a letter b'om the Secret'1ry of State, submitting the report of the International Joint Commission on its investiga- tion concerning the imp;rovement.of t!Ie St. Lawrence R;iver between Montreal and Lake Ene for naVIgatIon and power, laId before the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations on January 16, 1922).be printed with all accompanying papers and illustrations as a ::;enate document. Attest: GEORGE A. SANDERSON, Secretary. 2 ~ CONTENTS. Pane Part I. Introduction 9 Text of reference .......................... 9 Instrnctions to engineers 10 Interpretation of referenc!e_..-___________---___--__-__-_"_--____-_11 Scope of investigation 12 Part 11. Tho St. Lawrence Basin______ ~ ______. 15 Physicalchwncteristics 15 Artificialimprnvemcnts 16 (a) St. Lawrence Ship Channel ............................... 17 (b) Canals between Montreal and Lake Ontario _-______________ 20 LachineCanal 21 Soulanges Canal 22 Cornwall Csnal_________............................... 22 WilliamsburgCanals 22 Farrnns Point Canal ................................... 22 Rapide Plat Canal 22 GalopsCanal 23 (c)Welland 23 (d) Cilnals at Sault Ste. Marie ............................... 24 (e) Minor canals .......................... 26 Trent Canal--____-___-____-.-____-__---_-__-__--_-___- 26 MurrayCanal 27 Beauharnois Canal..................................... 27 Projected canals on Canadian side................................. 27 Huron and Ontarlo Ship Canal................................ 27 Lake St. Clair and Lake Erie Ship Canal....................... 28 Canals on the United States side.................................. 28 St. Clair Flats Canal-______-___-__-__--_____-_____--_-_-__-__28 Sturgeon Bay and LakeMichigan Ship Canal___________________ 28 Keweenaw waterway-____________"-_-___-_-_--____--_-____-__29 Black Rock Channel .......................................... 29 New Pork State canal system ................................. 30 Projected canals on United States side............................. 30 Niagara Ship Canal ____________________--__________---__-____ 30 Erie and Ontario Sanitary Canal.............................. 31 Lake Erie and Lake Michigan Ship Canal......................... 32 (f) Canals not connecting boundary waters- Canals on Canadian side................................ 32 Richelieu River Canals 32 St. Ours Lock and Dam................................. 33 Chambly Canal _____________________---_--_-----_-_----33 Rideau Canal________---______---___-_-_____---------__ 33 Ottawa River Canals- Ste. Anne's Lock 33 Carillon Canal-,.................................... 33 Grenville Canal.................................... 33 Georgian Bay Ship Canal project _____-______________--- 34 Projects for canals connecting theSt. Lawrence and the Ottawa_________-_______-_-_____--____--___--____-_-35 Lake Superior and Lake of the Woods waterway project" 35 Canals on United States side .................................... 35 New Pork State canal system ______________________-__________ 35 Ohio State Canals- Miami and Erie Canals .................................. 37 Northern division of Ohio canals___-______________________ 37 a 4 OONTEFCS. P.W. 38 38 39 40 40 40 41 41 44 45 45 45 47 48 49 49 50 50 50 50 53 54 67 82 91 99 104 106 506 106 118 120 136 137 139 155 158 159 160 161 161 161 162 162 162 163 163 163 163 164 164 165 165 165 166 167 170 170 171 174 176 180 181 INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION. WASHINQTON-OTTAWA. UNITI~DSTATBS. CANADA. OBADIAHQARDNER, Uhalrman. CHARLES A. MAGRATH, Uhaiman. CLARENCED. CLARK. HENRY A. POWELL, K. C. MARCUS A. SMITH. SIR WILLIAM HEARST, K. C. M. 0. WILLIAMH. SMITH,Bewetary. LAWRENCBJ. BURPEE,Secreta?!!. 6 LETTEROFTRANSMITTAL. To the Senate md House of Representatices: By section9 of an act entitled “An act makingappropriations for the construction, repair, and preservationof certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes,” approved March 2, 1919, the Congress expressed a desire that the Intornational Joint Commission investigate what further improvement of the St. Law- rence River between Montreal and Lake Ontariois necessary to make the river navigable for ocean-going vessels, together with the esti- mated cost. thereof. Under date of January 21, 1920, the Governments of the United States and Canada, by agreement, referred the matter to the Inter- national Joint Commission, pursuant to theprovisions of Article IX of the treatv relatine to the boundary waters between the United States and Canada, signed by the United States and Great Britain on January 11, 1909. I transmit herewith, for the information of the Congress and for such action as it may deem appropriate, a report, bearing date of December 19, 1921, submitted to the Department of State by a letter of the joint secretaries of the commission, dated January 6, 1922, presentingthe findings, conclusions, andrecornmendations of the commission regarding the matter. ITTAIIIIENG. IIAI:DING. THEWHITE HOUSE, January 16,1922. 1 LETTERS OF SUBMITTAL. The PRESIDENT: I have the honor to submit herewith for our consideration and for transmission to the Senate and House of !iiepresentatives, if that procedure have your approval, copies in duplicate of the report of the International Joint Commission on its investigation concerning the improvement of the St. Lawrence River between Montreal and Lake Ontario for navigation and power. By section 9 of an act entitled “An act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on riversand harbors, and for other purposes,” approvedMarch 2, 1919, the Congress expressed a desire that the International Joint Commission investigate what further improvement of the St. Law- rence River between Montrealand Lake Ontario is necessary to make the river navigable for ocean-going vessels, together with the estimated cost thereof. The report which I herewith submit, bearing date of December 19, 1921, submitted to the Department of State by a letter of the joint secretaries of the commission, dated January 6, 1922, presents the findings,conclusions, and recommendations of the commission on a reference of the matter to it under date of January 21, 1920, by agreement of the Governments of theUnited States and Canada underthe provisions of Article IX of thetreaty relating to the boundary waters between the United States and Canada, signed by the United States and Great Britain on January 11, 1909. Respectfully submitted. CHARLESE. HUGHES. DEPARTMENTOF STATE, Washington, January14,29%?. INTERNATIONALJOINT COMMISSION, Waskimgton, D. C., January 6, 19i%?. SIR: We have the honor to transmit herewith the report of the International Joint Commission in the matter of the St. Lawrence River navigation and power investigation, referred to the commis- sion on January 21, 1920, under the provisions of Article IX of the treaty of January 11, 1909, between the United States and Great Britain. We have the honor to be, sir, Your obedient servants, WM. H. SMITH, LAWRENCEJ. BIJRPEE, Joint Secretaries. The SECRETARYOF STATE, Washingtom, D.C. 8 \ REPORT ON THE ST. LAWRENCENAVIGATION AND POWER INVESTIGATION, 1921. PART I. INTRODUCTION. On the 21st of January, 1920, theGovernments of theUnited Statesand Canada referred to this commission forinvestigation and report, under the terms of article 9 of the treaty of January 11, 3.909, certain questions relating to the im rovement of the St. Law- rence River between Lake Ontario and dontreal for navigation and power. Thesequestions areset forth in the official reference, the terms of which are as follows: ' TEXT OF REFERENCE. I have the honor to inform you that the Governments of the United States Of America and of the Dominion of Canada, under the provisions of article 9 of the treaty of the 11th of .January, 1909, between theGovernments of the United States and Great Britain, herewith refer certain questions, as set forth below, involvingthe beneficial use of the waters of theSt. Lawrence River between Montreal and Lake Ontario, in the interests of bothcountries, and, ingeneral, the rights, obligations, or interests of eitherin relation to thr other, or to the inhabitants of the other along their common frontier. It is desired that the said questions be made the basis of an investigation to be carried out by the International Joint Commission, to the end that the said commission may submit a report to the two countries covering the subject matter of this reference, together with such conclusions and recommendations as may be considered pertinent in the premises. Question I. What further improvement in the St. Lawrence River, between Montreal and Lake Ontario, is necessary to make the same navigable for deep- draft vessels of either the lake or ocean-going type; what draft of water i* recommended; and what is the estimated cost? Inanswering this question the commission is requestedto consider: (a) Navigationinterests
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rideau Canal National Historic Site of Canada
    Rideau Canal national historic site of canada Management Plan Copyright Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2005 Government of Canada Catalogue No. R64-257/2005E ISBN: 0-662-33356-X Aussi disponible en français Rideau Canal national historic site of canada Management Plan May 2005 Lt. Col. John By, Royal Engineers; Royal Engineers Museum of Military Engineering Gillingham, U.K. If ever a man deserved to be immortalized in this utilitarian age, it was Lieutenant Colonel By. In an unexplored part of the country, where the only mode of progress was the frail Indian canoe, with a department to be organized, workmen to be instructed and many difficulties to overcome, he constructed a truly remarkable work. (Captain Richard Bonnycastle of the Royal Engineers, London, 1842) RIDEAU CANAL NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA Management Plan Foreword Canada’s national historic sites, national parks and national marine conservation areas represent the soul of our country. They are a central part of who we are and what we are. They are places of beauty and wonder and heritage. Each tells its own story. Together, they connect Canadians to our roots, to our future and to each other. We see a future in which each of the national historic sites of Canada, whether federally owned or not, enjoys sound commemorative health, and in which our system of sites evolves as our country evolves. Our national historic sites will be places for all Canadians to experience and learn from. They will help our communities to be vibrant and creative, and contribute to our efforts to revitalize Canada’s cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement-In-Principle
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGREEMENT-IN-PRINCIPLE AMONG: THE ALGONQUINS OF ONTARIO -and- ONTARIO -and- CANADA AGREEMENT-IN-PRINCIPLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY NOTE ................................................................................................ 1 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ............................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE AGREEMENT-IN-PRINCIPLE .................................. 5 PREAMBLE ................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 1: DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER 2: GENERAL PROVISIONS ...................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 3: ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLMENT .......................................................... 8 CHAPTER 4: CLAIMS INSTITUTIONS ....................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 5: LANDS ................................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER 6: CAPITAL TRANSFERS AND LOAN REPAYMENT............................. 13 CHAPTER 7: FORESTRY ......................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 8: HARVESTING ..................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 9: PARKS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arguments in Favor of the Ottawa and Georgian Bay Ship Canal
    ldo6 Oeoigian i3ay canal. Arguments in ravor ox the Ottawa and G-eorgian i3ay siiip canal. Ctbranj KINGSTON, ONTARIO > K*>) }?.Uk ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE OTTAWA AND GEORGIAN BAY 1 » WAP SKIP O -<A- 3SJ" A X# 5 THE SHORTEST, SAFEST, AND CHEAPEST ROUTE TO THE OCEAN FROM THE GREAT WEST, THROUGH CANADIAN TEPtRITORY AND THE ONLY CI.KT.UN M*ANS OK REVIVING AND RESTORING THE TRADE OF UNITED CANADA. ^%jm* y >.. .. — OTTAWA CITY, CANADA WEST. - 1856. n PRINTED AT OFFICE OF THE OTTAWA CITIZEN *. » » a II r=- , « « * * ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OP THE OTTAWA AND GEORGIAN BAY SHIP CANAIj; THE SHORTEST, SAFEST, AND CHEAPEST ROUTE TO THE OCEAN FROM THE GREAT WEST, THEOUGH CANADIAN TERRITORY; AND THE ONLY CERTAIN MEANS OF REVIVING AND RESTORING THE TRADE OF UNITED CANADA. OTTAWA CITY, CANADA WEST. ----- 1856. PRINTED AT OFFICE OF THE OTTAWA CITIZEN, YSo\^ At the first meeting of the Municipal Council of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell, held for the present year, at the Court House in L'Orignal, a petition was presented and unanimously adopted : u That a memorial be immediately drawn up and signed by the Warden, to the three branches of the Government, in favour of the Ottawa and Georgian Bay Ship Canal, and that a sum be appropriated to bring the subject, in a pamphlet form, before the public, and that Chas. P. Treadwell, Esq., Sheriff of these United Countiea, be requested to compile the same." In compliance with the foregoing request, and while offering nothing new of my own, I have selected from various papers letters and leading articles bearing on this most important subject.
    [Show full text]
  • (1909). Canal Statistics for the Season of Navigation, 1909
    10-11 EDWARD VII. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 20a A. 1911 DEPARTMENT OF RAILWAYS AND CANALS CANAL STATISTICS FOR THE SEASON OF NAVIGATION 1909 PRINTED BY ORDER OF PARLIAMENT O T T AWA PRINTED BY C. H. PARMELEE, PRINTER TO THE KING’S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 1910 No. 20a— 19111 — 10-1 1 EDWARD VII. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 20a A. 1911 To His Excellency the Right Honourable Sir Albert Henry George, Earl Grey, Viscount Hotviclc, Baron Grey of Hotcick, in the County of Northumberland, in the Peerage of the United Kingdom, and a Baronet ; Knight Grand Cross of the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, <kc., d'c., Arc., Governor General of Canada. May it Pleask Your Excellency, The undersigned has the honour to present to Your Excellency the report on Canal Statistics for the year ended December 31, 1909. GEO. P. GRAHAM, Minister of Railways and Canals. 20o-l* 10-11 EDWARD VII. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 20a A. 1911 To the Honourable George P. Graham, Minister of Railways and Canals. Sir, — I have the honour to submit the annual report of the Comptroller of Statis- tics in relation to the operations of the Canals of the Dominion for the year ended December 31, 1909. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, A. W. CAMPBELL, Deputy Minister of Railways and Canals. — - 10-11 EDWARD VII. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 20a A. 1911 Office of the Comptroller of Statistics, February 7, 1910. A. W. Campbell, Esq., Deputy Minister of Railways and Canals. Sir, —I have the honour to submit to you herewith Canal Statistics for the year ended December 31, 1909.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWNSHIP of GILLIES RR#I,1092 Hwy. 595, Kakabeka Falls, Ontario POT Lwo Tel: (807) 475-3185
    TOWNSHIP OF GILLIES RR#I,1092 Hwy. 595, Kakabeka Falls, Ontario POT lWO Tel: (807) 475-3185. Fax: (807) 473-0767 E~Mail: gillies@tbavtel.net • www.gilliestownship.ca Reeve: Rick Kleri Administration: Councillors: Rosalie A. Evans, Rudy Buitenhuis COPIEDTO: COUNCH... 0 DEPT HEAOSCJ Solicitor·Clerk, Deputy Treasurer Willlam Groenheide Nadia La Russa, Treasurer Karen O'Gorman Shara Lavallee, Deputy Clerk Wendy Wright February 10, 201 5 AC110tt ~l£Dcc ~ Rc:: oEPTH~SD Transmitted by email: REFERRED TO: '\. l .. I ,...c:; All Municipal Clerks For Municipalities in Northern Ontario (North of the French River) Re: Resolution of the Council of The Corporation ofthe TOWlShip of Gilties th Passed on February 9 , 2015, relating to the Chicken Farmers of Ontario Exempt Flock Limit Dear Mr. or Madam Cleric Please be ad vised that the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Gillies passed the fol lowing resolution (moved by Councillor O'Gorman and seconded by Councillor Groenheide) at its regular meeting held February 4th, 2015: WHEREAS the current exempt flock limit of 300 broiler birds from the quota system of the Chicken Farmers of Ontario is too low to allow a viable business model for small scale producers; AND WHEREAS other Provinces have higher exemption levels, which allow for local small agri-business economic development; AND WHEREAS Premier Wynne promotes increased agricultural production in Ontario to enhance the local food movement; AND WHEREAS Northern Ontario's economy is an excellent setting for agricultural production as diversification
    [Show full text]
  • The Welland Ship Canal and the Men Who Died to Build It
    The Welland Ship Canal and the men who died to build it Friday, August 28, 2015 Lock 1 of the Welland Canal is shown with its gates closed in June 1924, in this photo taken by J. A. McDonald, courtesy of the Welland Ship Canal album, Brock University Archives. The Welland Canal Fallen Workers Memorial is expected to be completed in 2017 and will be located along the canal close to Lock 3. This series of columns complements the work of the task force in bringing the monument to reality, and brings to life the men who were a part of the construction. This memorial will honour the memory of the 137 men who lost their lives in the construction of this major national infrastructure project. The Welland Ship Canal — also known as the fourth and most current Welland Canal — was a major Canadian infrastructure project. With a view to modernizing and making more efficient the previous canal, the construction work, which began in 1913 and would continue until 1935, would have a lasting impact on the local community. This project cut right through the geography of the region and its economic impact would be felt nationally. At its peak, the work engaged 4,000 workers with many thousands more having been employed at different times over the course of the two decades of construction. As we have read in these pages, this great national project was also one of tragedy. A staggering 137 men lost their lives as a result of accidents that occurred during the construction. This number is shockingly high.
    [Show full text]
  • Welland Canal
    £ FIRST REPORT. WELLAND CANAL. MAY, 1830. FIRST GENERAL REPORT FROM ltobttt lltllu~al, iE ~quft t, THE CO~DIISSIO"'ER APPOINTED "UNDER AND flY VIRTUE OF" AN ACT PA$SED IN THE ELEVENTH YEAR OF HIS MAJESTY';:; RE.IGN, ENTITLED, "An Act to grant a furthrr lNlll to the Hi [land ermn! C :nrpai/!/ and to regulate tlteir furtlter opf1'ations." FEBRUAiH' Sib, 1831. - ORDERED BY THE HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY TO nE PRINTBD. YOnK: .JAlIiES BAXTER, PRINTEIII l1:i3I. FIRST REPORT, &c. '0 His Excellency SirJolm Colborne, ](lIight, An opinion is very generally entertained, by Comlnandcr of tile most Honorable Military persons residing near the Canal, tllat the mar­ order of tIle Bath, Lieutenant Governor of gin will give way in other places along the line tile Prol1ince of Upper Canada, JJlajor Ge­ of deep cutting; and it is indeed ptobable that neral commanding IIis lilajesty's Fones tllcre­ such will be the rase; for the banks that remain in, ~c. ~c. ~·c. unbroken, are apparently in the same unstable condition as were those places which have al­ t at ~n early period after the passing of the act ready fallen ill; the quality of the soil is the Ithorising and appointing me to examine the same and they are equally steep-Rut I do not reHand Canal, and to report to your Excellen- apprehend any very serious consequences from "T "all such f,lcts and information" as I might this state of the banks, for there are now eight, deem useful, in aiel of forming a correct opinion" ten, and in some places, twelvo feet of water .
    [Show full text]
  • Your Cruise Great Lakes of North America
    Great Lakes of North America From 9/25/2022 From Milwaukee Ship: LE BELLOT to 10/2/2022 to Toronto Set sail with PONANT aboard Le Bellot for an 8-day cruise discovering the Great Lakes of North America, in the heart of a flamboyant nature full of the colours of the Indian summer. You will leave from Milwaukee, in the US state of Wisconsin, the beginning of your voyage following the footsteps of the first settlers, trappers and Native Americans, before a lovely sailing experience on Lake Michigan, a veritable inland sea. The next lake, Lake Huron, boasts a myriad of islands in its northern part, with white rocks capped with conifers plunging into the sapphire waters of the lake. Sumptuous landscapes unveil multiple original panoramas, in particular near Flowerpot Island*, which you will be able to approach by Zodiac®. You will also discover the charming city of Parry Sound, in the heart of the wonderful UNESCO Biosphere Reserve of Georgian Bay. Le Bellot will then sail the canal connecting Lake Erie to Lake Ontario. From this call in Port Colborne, you will be able to see the impressive sight of Niagara Falls. These three powerful waterfalls, renowned the world over, are an exquisite natural spectacle. To round off your cruise, you will sail along the shimmering waters of Lake Ontario before making your way to the cosmopolitan city of Toronto, where you will disembark. * Zodiac® cruise weather dependant. The information in this document is valid as of 10/1/2021 Great Lakes of North America YOUR STOPOVERS : MILWAUKEE Embarkation 9/25/2022 from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM Departure 9/25/2022 at 6:00 PM Nested on the shores of Lake Michigan,Milwaukee , the largest city in the State of Wisconsin, harmoniously combines tradition and modernity.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Deliveries and Cruising
    Great Lakes Deliveries and Cruising Captains Roy Adler & Ken Hawes OUTLINE •Background •Cruise Planning •Great Lakes Pathways •Special Items •Route Selection •Q & A •Delivery Planning Atlantic Access Approximately 250 statute Miles to St. Lawrence Seaway Champlain Canal Lake Champlain Richelieu River Chambly Canal Great Lake Distances (in statute miles) Great Lake Length Width Lake Ontario 192 53 Lake Erie 240 38 - 57 Lake Huron 206 183* Lake Michigan 307 118 Lake Superior 350 160 *widest point HUDSON RIVERText ACCESS statute height Canal locks days miles restrictions Erie 363 57 15.5’ 5 Erie - 204 30 21’ 3 Oswego Champlain 64 12 15.5’-17’ 1 Chambly 12 9 29’ <1 Welland 27 8 N/A <1 to 2 Trent - 239 44 22’ 5 Severn ATLANTIC OCEAN ACCESS height Waterway statute miles locks restrictions Canso Strait 17 1 N/A St. Lawrence 2500 15 N/A Seaway* * Gulf of St.Lawrence to Lake Erie ANNAPOLIS TO CHICAGO Routes Approximate Statute Miles Erie Canal 1700 Erie -Oswego - Welland Canals 1700 Erie-Oswego-Trent-Severn 1600 Canals Champlain - Chambly - St. 2200 Lawrence -Welland Canals Champlain - Chambly - St. 2100 Lawrence -Trent-Severn Canso Strait - Welland 3900 Canso Strait - Trent-Severn 3800 ROUTE SELECTION Yacht Height Owners Requirements Weather Forecast Fuel Range Lock Crew Requirements Yacht Length and Weight CHICAGO DELIVERY PLANNING 52’ Carver Voyager’ Fuel Tank -- 800 gallons Cruise Burn Rate -- 50 gal./hour Cruise speed -- 25 knots Distance -- 1700 miles Boat Height -- 20’ *Plan Days -- 9 * assumes perfect weather ERIE CANAL ENT ERIE CANAL TOLL BUILDING ERIE CANAL TYPICAL LOCK ERIE CANAL Fender Arrangement ERIE CANAL REMOTE SECTION ERIE CANAL SCHENECTADY YACHT CLUB ERIE CANAL OLD BARGE ERIE CANAL ILION MARINA ERIE CANAL TYPICAL LINE WITH WEIGHTS LAKE ONEIDA BRIDGE ON WESTERN SIDE OSWEGO CANAL MOVING INTO OSWEGO, NY OSWEGO MARINA LAKE ONTARIO LAKE ONTARIO LEAVING OSWEGO, NY ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Dewatering and Minor Lock/Dam Maintenance
    REPLACEMENT CLASS SCREENING REPORT FOR ROUTINE IN-WATER WORKS PROJECTS: • DEWATERING AND MINOR LOCK/DAM MAINTENANCE • BRIDGE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR • BOATHOUSE REPAIRS AND REMOVAL • DOCK INSTALLATION REPAIR AND REMOVAL • LAUNCH RAMP INSTALLATION MAINTENANCEAND REMOVAL • SHORELINE STABILIZATION ALONG THE RIDEAU CANAL AND THE TRENT-SEVERN WATERWAY Prepared for: Parks Canada Agency Prepared by: Kelli E. Saunders, M.Sc. Resource Consultant October 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 1.1 Class Screening and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act ............................1 1.2 Rationale for Replacement Class Screening ...................................................................4 1.3 Consultation ...........................................................................................................6 1.4 Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry......................................................6 2.0 PROJECTS SUBJECT TO CLASS SCREENING........................................................7 2.1 Projects Subject to the Act .....................................................................................7 2.2 Projects Not Subject to this Replacement
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic and Structural Design of Navigational Locks
    nvironm E en l & ta Dhanuka et al., J Civil Environ Eng 2018, 8:1 i l iv E C n f g o i n DOI: 10.4172/2165-784X.1000297 l Journal of Civil & Environmental e a e n r r i n u g o J ISSN: 2165-784X Engineering Research Article Open Access Hydraulic and Structural Design of Navigational Locks Amit Dhanuka1*, Shivendra Kumar Agrawal2 and Honey Mehra1 1Howe Projects Engineering Pvt Ltd, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India 2Department of Irrigation and Hydraulics, Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh, India Abstract Navigation lock is a structure in the waterway provided to create a safe navigation passage between two water pools which are not at the same level. The reason for difference in water levels can be natural such as tidal variations or can be manmade such as construction of dam or barrage across the river. The main components of Navigation lock comprise of approach channels, lock pit, filling/emptying arrangement. Design of lock depends on lockage time, water level variations, Lock capacity requirements, design vessel size. filling/emptying system shall be designed to work under gravity flow without any pumping requirements. Filling/emptying system is chosen to get appropriate filling/ emptying time. The optimum time for filling and emptying is generally kept between 8.0-10.0 minutes. The size of filling culverts are so computed to attain the optimum time for filling/emptying. Every lock is unique in terms of its geology, location, size, requirements and water level differences. Here typical design aspects of a navigational Lock in inland waterway have been described.
    [Show full text]
  • Barge Canal” Is No Longer an Accurate Description of the New York State Canals Marine Activity on New York’S Canals
    The Story of the Afterword Today, the name “Barge Canal” is no longer an accurate description of the New York State Canals marine activity on New York’s canals. Trains and trucks have taken over the transport of most cargo that once moved on barges along the canals, but the canals remain a viable waterway for navigation. Now, pleasure boats, tour Historical and Commercial Information boats, cruise ships, canoes and kayaks comprise the majority of vessels that ply the waters of the legendary Erie and the Champlain, Oswego and Cayuga- Seneca canals, which now constitute the 524-mile New York State Canal ROY G. FINCH System. State Engineer and Surveyor While the barges now are few, this network of inland waterways is a popular tourism destination each year for thousands of pleasure boaters as well as visitors by land, who follow the historic trade route that made New York the “Empire State.” Across the canal corridor, dozens of historic sites, museums and community festivals in charming port towns and bustling cities invite visitors to step back in time and re-live the early canal days when “hoggees” guided mule-drawn packet boats along the narrow towpaths. Today, many of the towpaths have been transformed into Canalway Trail segments, extending over 220 miles for the enjoyment of outdoor enthusiasts from near and far who walk, bike and hike through scenic and historic canal areas. In 1992, legislation was enacted in New York State which changed the name of the Barge Canal to the “New York State Canal System” and transferred responsibility for operation and maintenance of the Canal System from the New York State Department of Transportation to the New York State Canal Corporation, a newly created subsidiary of the New York State Thruway Authority.
    [Show full text]