DOCSLIB.ORG

The Centre of Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Centre of Government House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts The centre of government Nineteenth Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with the formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 October 2014 HC 107 Published on 22 October 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Rt Hon Margaret Hodge (Labour, Barking) (Chair) Mr Richard Bacon (Conservative, South Norfolk) Guto Bebb (Conservative, Aberconwy) Mr David Burrowes (Conservative, Enfield, Southgate) Jackie Doyle-Price (Conservative, Thurrock) Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative, Daventry) Meg Hillier (Labour, Hackney South and Shoreditch) Mr Stewart Jackson (Conservative, Peterborough) Andrea Leadsom (Conservative, South Northamptonshire) Rt Hon Anne McGuire (Labour, Stirling) Austin Mitchell (Labour, Great Grimsby) John Pugh (Liberal Democrats. Southport) Nick Smith (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) Stephen Phillips QC (Conservative, Sleaford and North Hykeham) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/pac. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee is Sarah Petit (Clerk), Claire Cozens (Committee Specialist), James McQuade (Senior Committee Assistant), Joellen Perry, Sue Alexander and Jamie Mordue (Committee Assistants) and Janet Coull Trisic (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk, Committee of Public Accounts, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5708; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 Conclusions and recommendations 4 1 The role of the centre of government 7 2 How the centre works with departments 10 3 Government skills and capability 12 Formal Minutes 14 Witnesses 15 List of printed written evidence 15 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 16 3 Summary A strong and effective centre of government is vital for the effective operation of government as a whole and for ensuring a focus on improved value for money for the taxpayer. However, there is a lack of clarity about the centre’s precise role, particularly the respective responsibilities of the Cabinet Office, HM Treasury and the Prime Minister’s Office (Number 10), and how they work together as a coherent centre. The centre sometimes intervenes to address issues with high-priority government programmes, but has too often failed to do so effectively or at an early enough stage. In part, this is because the centre does not have a joined-up single view of strategic risks across government, meaning it is often reactive in its response rather than able to anticipate potentially serious problems. There are gaps in key skills at the centre and across departments, such as financial management capability and contracting expertise, which are compounded because government repeatedly fails to learn lessons and share good practice from past experience. After our evidence session in July the Government announced that the roles of Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service will be combined, and there will be a new Chief Executive post at the centre of government. Implementing these changes may provide an opportunity to make progress on the role of the centre and we intend to return to this topic in a further session before the end of this Parliament, by which time we expect to see significant progress on the recommendations we make below. 4 Conclusions and recommendations 1. The centre of government comprises the Cabinet Office, HM Treasury and Number 10. Together, these central bodies are responsible for coordinating and overseeing the work of government as a whole, to help government achieve its aims and priorities. The centre also works with departments to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their operations, for example by providing direction on making cost savings, standards for financial management and reporting, and assurance over the delivery of major projects. 2. The current lack of clarity about the precise role and responsibilities of the centre jeopardises government’s ability to deliver value for money in key public spending areas. Correspondence we received indicates that agreement between the civil service and ministers on the role of the centre does not yet exist. The civil service remains committed to departmental autonomy whilst ministers want an effective, smart and challenging centre. This lack of agreement means that there is no clear definition of the role of the centre and the accountabilities for implementing cross- government initiatives are not always clear. We accept there needs to be a balance between central control and departmental autonomy. Nevertheless, too often we see a failure of the centre to intervene appropriately and quickly to avoid poor value for money for the taxpayer. Universal Credit is a case in point. The Cabinet Office, the Treasury and Number 10 need to focus more effectively on their central role and on working together as an integrated centre of government. We welcome the permanent secretaries’ commitment to provide us with a statement of the role of the centre. Recommendation: The permanent secretaries’ statement on the centre should set out: • the role of the centre as one integrated capability; • the respective roles and responsibilities of the Cabinet Office, the Treasury and Number 10; • how these three bodies work together; and • how the centre works with other central government departments. As a starting point, they should use the suggested responsibilities of the centre set out in the Comptroller and Auditor General’s report.1 3. The centre is not working effectively with departments to maintain a focus on timely implementation of cross-government priorities. Departments are making unacceptably slow progress on some central efficiency initiatives such as shared services, resulting in taxpayers’ money being wasted. The centre needs to challenge departments more actively on their implementation of cross-government initiatives, 1 C&AG’s Report, The centre of government, Session 2014-15, HC 171, 19 June 2014, para 11 5 like debt collection, including by holding permanent secretaries more strongly to account for departmental performance. While Accounting Officers do have an obligation to deliver value for money across government, as well as within their own departments, they do not then have meaningful incentives to work in the wider interests of government as a whole. Recommendation: The centre should set out how it will improve performance management and incentives, to ensure that departments deliver cross-government priorities successfully and within the intended timescales. 4. The centre does not intervene early enough to prevent major departmental projects and programmes from failing. The permanent secretaries told us that the centre does intervene in individual departments when departmental programmes or projects are at risk of failure or Accounting Officers have failed on the job; although this is not usually done in public and they acknowledged that their interventions tend to occur when there is a crisis. Our examinations of failings with major projects such as Universal Credit indicate the centre is not intervening effectively before serious problems arise. Central departments have various sources of intelligence about strategic risks, such as information from Treasury spending teams, Major Projects Authority assurance reviews, and Implementation Unit stocktakes, and should ensure that this information is used to anticipate significant risks and intervene appropriately. The centre also needs to ensure lessons are learned from past experience of project failures or poor performance, and that this process is formalised. For example, in letting recent renewables contracts, government appeared to have learned little from its experience of PFI contracts in terms of ensuring some clawback of any excessive returns. Recommendation: The centre should: • draw together its strands of intelligence to form an integrated, single view of strategic risks. Where such risks are identified, the centre needs to robustly challenge departments, intervening earlier and more effectively to prevent project failure; and • explain how it will ensure that lessons from past experience are properly considered when planning new projects. 5. Key specialist skills are in short supply and are not distributed effectively between departments and the centre. The effectiveness of government is undermined by shortages in specialist skills and capability, for example there are recognised gaps in commercial, contracting and financial management expertise. Some progress is being made, such
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Future of the Civil Service
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Future of the Civil Service Written Evidence List of written evidence 1. The Universities of Birmingham and Sheffield ‘Shrinking the State’ ESRC Research Project (CSR 1) 2. Dr Andrew Blick, Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies, King’s College London (CSR 2) 3. Prospect (CSR 3) 4. Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) (CSR 4) 5. Institute for Government (CSR 5) 6. First Division Association (FDA) (CSR 6) 7. Project Management Institute (CSR 7) 8. Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) (CSR 8) 9. Cabinet Office (CSR 9) 10. Martin Surr (CSR 10) 11. Mr Patrick Diamond, Professor David Richards and Professor Martin Smith (CSR 11) 12. Dr Suzy Walton (CSR 12) 13. Sir John Elvidge (CSR 13) 14. Mark Balchin (CSR 14) 15. Professor Howard Elcock (CSR 15) 16. Dr Chris Gibson-Smith (CSR 16) 17. Dr Ruth Levitt and William Solesbury, Visiting Senior Research Fellows, Dept of Political Economy, King's College London (CSR 17) 18. D H Owen (CSR 18) 19. Philip Virgo (CSR 19) 20. Active Operations Management International LLP (CSR 20) 21. Association for Project Management (CSR 21) 22. Additional evidence from FDA (CSR 22) 23. Dr John Parkinson, The University of Warwick (CSR 23) 24. Civil Service Commission (CSR 24) 25. Professor Matthew Flinders (University of Sheffield), Professor Chris Skelcher (University of Birmingham), Dr. Katharine Dommett (University of Sheffield) & Dr Katherine Tonkiss (University of Birmingham) (CSR 25) 26. Professor the Lord Norton of Louth (CSR 26) 27. Rt Hon Jack Straw MP (CSR 27) 28. Civil Service Commission (CSR 28) 29.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honours System
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee The Honours System Second Report of Session 2012–13 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/pasc Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 17 July 2012 HC 19 [incorporating HC 1921-i, Session 2010-12] Published on 31 August 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 The Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) (Chair) Alun Cairns MP (Conservative, Vale of Glamorgan) Michael Dugher MP (Labour, Barnsley East) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Greg Mulholland MP (Liberal Democrat, Leeds North West) Priti Patel MP (Conservative, Witham) Lindsay Roy MP (Labour, Glenrothes) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Leadership of change: new arrangements for the roles of the Head of the Civil Service and the Cabinet Secretary Further Report , with the Government Response to the Committee’s Nineteenth Report of Session 2010–12 Twenty Third Report of Session 2010–12 Report and appendix, together with formal minutes Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 March 2012 HC 1914 Published on 28 March 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) (Chair) Alun Cairns MP (Conservative, Vale of Glamorgan) Michael Dugher MP (Labour, Barnsley East) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Greg Mulholland MP (Liberal Democrat, Leeds North West) Priti Patel MP (Conservative, Witham) Lindsay Roy MP (Labour, Glenrothes) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitor 50 Constitution Unit Newsletter | January 2012
    Monitor 50 Constitution Unit Newsletter | January 2012 Will the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee change the rules of succession? The announcement in October at the Commonwealth conference in the removal of the ‘unjust discrimination’ against Catholics, the Perth of changes to the rules of succession suggested it was a done Archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, said that he recognised deal. David Cameron had obtained the agreement of the heads of the importance of the established Church of England. The Catholic government of the 15 other countries of which the Queen is head Church in Scotland has been less accommodating. And in the 15 of state (the realms). The UK can now be expected to lead the way, realms where Catholics outnumber Anglicans by three to one, riding the tide of goodwill towards the monarchy following the royal there may also be less understanding. wedding in 2011 and the Queen’s diamond jubilee in 2012. But all the realms will then have to change their laws, in a process which could take years. EXECUTIVE It has been a longstanding aim of British governments to end the discrimination in the laws of succession. 11 private members’ bills have been introduced into Parliament in the last 20 years to reform the Act of Settlement. Most other European monarchies have already Reconfiguration of the Cabinet Secretary’s role changed their rules of succession to make them gender neutral. Sweden changed their law in 1980, Holland in 1983, Norway in Sir Gus O’Donnell has retired as UK Cabinet Secretary after 32 years 1990, Belgium in 1991, Denmark in 2009 (with a referendum), and as a civil servant.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribute to the Late Baroness (Maragaret) Thatcher by Sir Jeremy Heywood and Sir Bob Kerslake Daily Telegraph 15 Apr 2013 (See Note 1)
    Tribute to the late Baroness (Maragaret) Thatcher By Sir Jeremy Heywood and Sir Bob Kerslake Daily Telegraph 15 Apr 2013 (See Note 1) Much has been written about Margaret Thatcher's extraordinary career as a political leader, but much less attention has been given to the indelible impression leFt on the Civil Service, and on the civil servants who worked closely with her, by Britain's First Female prime minister. When she came into power in 1979, aFter the so–called winter oF discontent, many saw the Civil Service as the all–too–willing stewards oF the "orderly decline oF Britain". By the time she leFt ofFice 11 years later, the landscape was transFormed and the Civil Service modernised. As Lord Wilson, her Former Cabinet Secretary oF the late 1980s, said, "she made us positive about the revitalisation oF the British economy". Her drive and determination changed the way people, including civil servants, thought about their own country. Alongside radical tax reForms, the abandonment oF exchange controls and prices and incomes policies, the introduction oF Right to Buy, a major overhaul oF industrial relations law and the world's First privatisation programme, Margaret Thatcher also led a signiFicant programme oF Civil Service reForm. She began with an attack on waste and red tape designed to make the Civil Service more businesslike – through a programme oF intensive "eFFiciency scrutinies" inspired by Derek Rayner, the Former CEO oF Marks & Spencer. Then, Following a review by Sir Robin Ibbs oF ICI, she launched the Next Steps Initiative, which led to the creation oF executive agencies, transForming the Whitehall landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Between Central and Local Governments in the U.K
    Communication between Central and Local Governments in the U.K. Yukiko Fujita, Professor, Faculty of Law, Senshu University This article focuses on communication between central and local governments in the U.K., especially on the roles and functions of DCLG, LGA and SOLACE. Its two main features are firstly that networks among politicians are strictly separated from those of administrative officers, and secondly that their informal communication is as important as formal communication such as consultation and periodic meetings. Moreover, policies based on localism and decentralisation of the current coalition government have just started, so it is too early to evaluate them. The aggressive propositions by special local governments and joint bodies like GLA and GMCA might affect the relationship between central and local governments. Introduction In the United Kingdom1, the Localism bill was passed into law on October 31, 2011 (Royal Assent on November 15, 2011). The Act includes a wide variety of provisions including granting of general power of competence which allows local governments any activity unprohibited by law, enhanced authority of local communities, granting of more discretion on regional developments to local governments and communities, and a plan to introduce a mayor election system to metropolitan cities. Based on the Local Government Act 1972, the relationship between the central government and local governments in the UK (hereinafter called “the relationship between central and local governments”) has featured strong
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Office Permanent Secretaries' Meetings with External
    CABINET OFFICE PERMANENT SECRETARIES’ MEETINGS WITH EXTERNAL ORGANISATIONS1: 1 January to 31 March 2012 Sir Jeremy Heywood, Cabinet Secretary Date of Name of External Purpose of Meeting Meeting Organisation January Sir Peter Gershon Lunch and discussion on National Grid business January Sir Erik Bennett Defence issues January Sir Stuart Etherington Breakfast and general discussion January CBI Economic and EU issues discussion January BAE Systems General discussion January SAGA Social care discussion January Sir Richard Broadbent Corporate social responsibility discussion January Jim Gallagher Devolution issues discussion February Lloyds Economic issues February Various Scottish academics Economic and constitutional and business leaders discussion February KPMG Fraud issues February Social Policy academics and ‘What Works’ Forum experts February Met Police (Bernard Hogan- Dinner and general Howe) discussion on police issues February Academy of Medical Royal Discussion on NHS reform Colleges February Bank of England Discussion on economic issues February Centrica plc. Discussion on energy issues February Marks & Spencer Economic discussion February CBI Dinner and roundtable discussion February BP Discussion on global, economic and energy issues February Lockheed Martin General discussion March Price Waterhouse Coopers Lunch and general discussion March EDF Energy General discussion on energy issues March Ken Costa Discussion on youth unemployment March Areva General discussion on energy issues March E.on General discussion on 1 Does not
    [Show full text]
  • Impartiality Matters: Perspectives on the Importance of Impartiality in the Civil Service in a “Post Truth” World
    impartiality matters: perspectives on the importance of impartiality in the civil service in a “post truth” world Edited by Steve Barwick The Smith Institute The Smith Institute is an independent think tank which provides a high-level forum for thought leadership and debate on public policy and politics. It seeks to engage politicians, senior decision makers, practitioners, academia, opinion formers and commentators on promoting policies for a fairer society. FDA The FDA is the only trade union dedicated to representing managers and professionals in public service. As we celebrate our centenary year, we have the experience and influence to make a real difference for our members – striving to improve their terms, conditions and working lives while acting as a powerful advocate for our members and the vital public services they deliver. THE SMITH INSTITUTE impartiality matters: perspectives on the importance of impartiality in the civil service in a “post truth” world Edited by Steve Barwick Published by The Smith Institute This report represents the views of the authors and not those of the Smith Institute. © The Smith Institute July 2019 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Contents Foreword Dave Penman, General Secretary, FDA 3 Introduction Steve Barwick, Deputy Director, the Smith Institute 8 Speaking truth to power Sir David Normington, former First Civil Service Commissioner 14 “Yes Minister, we do need to celebrate impartiality” Lord Bob Kerslake, former Head of the Civil Service 20 Impartiality: a perspective from an ex-civil servant and special
    [Show full text]
  • SUCCESS Civil Issue 303 | February 2021 | Service Award Shortlist
    CELEBRATING SUCCESS Civil Issue 303 | February 2021 | www.civilserviceworld.com Service Award Shortlist HMT’S PUBLIC FINANCE CHIEF ON A CA THECTIC YEAR LITACE IN THE TLE PACK HOW BREXIT Inside government’s SHOOK WHITEHALL innovation engine the inside story 01 CSW303 cover.indd 1 17/02/2021 15:07:39 Championing Diversity, Accelerating Inclusion Dods D&I is a unique experience-sharing platform. We design and deliver cutting edge events to keep you up to date with the evolving landscape of Diversity and Inclusion. Kickstart your learning by joining us for a CPD-certifi ed event, designed to provide you with vital skills and insight to advance cohesion, productivity and wellbeing in your organization. To view our upcoming event schedule, please visit: www.dodsdiversity.com www.dodsdiversity.com | [email protected] | 0207 593 5739 @dodsdiversity Dods Diversity & Inclusion DIVERSITY & INCLUSION Dods D&I Advert for CSA 230x300.indd 1 17/02/2021 14:56:46 CONTENTS February 2021 Editorial Published by [email protected] 020 7593 5569 Advertising [email protected] www.civilserviceworld.com 020 7593 5606 RED BOX 4 INBOX Whitehall refrom reflections and letters 6 NEWS HMRC unveils a three-year pay deal OPINION 8 ALEX THOMAS A review could help the PM impose his grip on government 9 DAVE PENMAN HMRC’s pay deal is groundbreaking and other departments should catch up 10 PHILIP A. BERRY & JOE DEVANNY The PM’s aid cut shows what his vision for “Global Britain” means in practice DIGITAL AND DATA 24 BATTLING COVID
    [Show full text]
  • Third Report on Operation of the Reformed Honours System
    THIRD REPORT ON OPERATION OF THE REFORMED HONOURS SYSTEM Note by the Cabinet Office 1. In its response to the Reports by the Public Administrative Select Committee (A Matter of Honour: Reforming the Honours System, HC212 – 1 July 2004) and Sir Hayden Phillips (Review of the Honours System, Report to the Cabinet Secretary of July 2004) the Government said (Reform of the Honours System, CM 6479 of February 2005) that it believed it would be right for a report on the honours system to be published every three years. The first report was published in 2008; the second in 2011. 2. This is the third report. It focuses on the way the system has continued to develop over the last three years. The main changes have been: - The reintroduction of the British Empire Medal, allowing a 30% increase in the overall number of honours awarded (page 2). - A revised distribution of honours, including an increased allocation of honours to recognise more outstanding headteachers, following the Quinquennial Review of Honours in 2013 (page 3). - Improved gender balance in the honours lists (page 5.). - Increased outreach efforts to improve the diversity, transparency and public understanding of the honours system (page 7). - Longer published citations for those receiving the highest awards (page 9). - More extensive background checks on potential honours recipients (page 9.). - The creation of a new honours committee to cover Political and Parliamentary Service (page10). - Increased efforts to identify and honour philanthropists (page 11). - An increased number of forfeitures (page11). - A limited return to former custom whereby the Prime Minister is able to recommend honours candidates directly to Her Majesty The Queen (page 13.).
    [Show full text]
  • Honours: History and by Hazel Armstrong
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 02832, 27 February 2017 Honours: History and By Hazel Armstrong reviews Inside: 1. The modern honours system 2. Types of honour 3. Removal of an honour 4. History and reviews: timeline www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 02832, 27 February 2017 2 Contents Summary 3 Revival of political honours 3 Removal of an honour: Forfeiture 3 Reviews of the honours system 3 1. The modern honours system 4 1.1 Honours: an introduction 4 2. Types of honour 6 2.1 Political honours: a brief history 6 Political honours: 1966-2005 6 Political honours: Criminal investigation 2005-2006 6 2.2 Parliamentary and Political Service Honours Committee (2012) 7 2.3 Resignation Honours 8 Resignation honours by Prime Minister 9 2.4 Comment on the David Cameron honours 10 2.5 Critique of Labour Party nomination (2016) 11 3. Removal of an honour 12 3.1 Sir Philip Green (2016) 12 3.2 Membership of the Forfeiture Committee 14 3.3 Critiques of the forfeiture system 15 3.4 Historical examples of forfeiture 17 3.5 Removal from a person who has died 18 4. History and reviews: timeline 19 4.1 Royal Commission and outcomes (1922) 19 4.2 Prime Minister Harold Wilson (1967) 20 4.3 Prime Minister John Major review (1992) 20 4.4 Committee on Standards in Public Life (1998) 21 4.5 Wilson Review (2000-01) 22 4.6 Phillips Review (2004) 23 4.7 PASC report and responses (2004) 24 4.8 Government response to Philips and Public Administration Select Committee (2005) 25 4.9 Prime Minister Tony Blair reforms (2006) 28 4.10 PASC inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth to Power: How Civil Service Reform Can Succeed
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) Truth to power: how Civil Service reform can succeed Eighth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral evidence Written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/pasc Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 3 September 2013 HC 74 [incorporating HC 664-i-x,Session 2012–13] Published on 6 September 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £29.40 The Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) (Chair) Alun Cairns MP (Conservative, Vale of Glamorgan) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Greg Mulholland MP (Liberal Democrat, Leeds North West) Priti Patel MP (Conservative, Witham) Mr Steve Reed MP (Labour, Croydon North) Lindsay Roy MP (Labour, Glenrothes) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]