(Jearbook 1982 J Preme Court Historical Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Jearbook 1982 J Preme Court Historical Society (JEARBOOK 1982 J PREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY EDWARD DOUGLASS WHITE NINTH CHIEF JUSTICE, 1910-1921 !rEARBOOK 1982 UPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, Honorary Chairman Fred Vinson, Chairman Linwood Holton, President EDITOR William F Swindler ASSOCIATE EDITOR Jeffrey B. Morris ASSISTANT EDITORS David T. Pride Kathleen Shurtleff CONTRIBUTORS Paul R. Baier was a Judicial Fellow in the Supreme Court of the United States, 1975-1976, and is an Associate Professor of Law at Louisiana State University. Michal R. Bel knap is an Assistant Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Elizabeth S. Black, a former Secretary and current Trustee of the Supreme Court Historical Society, was married to Justice Hugo L. Black from 1957 until his death in 1971. Amelia Roberts Fry was the director of the Earl Warren Oral History Project at the Bancroft Library, University of California at Berkeley, from 1969 to 1981. Barrett McGurn, who served many years as a foreign bureau chief for the New York Herald-Tribune, is currently the Public Information Officer of the Supreme Court of the United States. Jeffrey Morris is the Associate Editor of the SCHS Yearbook and an Assistant Profes­ sor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. Margaret H. Potts is a former Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Tulsa in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Lewis F Powell, Jr. is an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Merlo J. Pusey, a former editorial writer for the Washington Post, is the author of the Pulitzer Prize winning biography of Charles Evans Hughes. Sally Jo Vasicko chairs the Department of Political Science at Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana and is an Associate Professor of Political Science at that institution. Earl Warren , Jr., son of the former Chief Justice, is ajudge in the Municipal Court in Sacramento, California. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Officers and Trustees of the Supreme Court Historical Society would like to thank the Charles Evans Hughes Memorial Foundation for their generous support of the publication of this Yearbook . YEARBOOK 1982 Supreme Court Historical Society My Father the Chief Justice 6 Earl Warren, Jr. The Warren Tapes: Oral History and the Supreme Court 10 Amelia Roberts Fry Of Politics and the Court 23 Lewis F Powell, Jr. Chief Justice Edward Douglass White and President Taft's COL!rt 27 Jeffrey B. Morris Justice Harlan and the Equal Protection Clause 46 Sally Jo Vasiclw Justice Murphy: A Reexamination 57 Margaret H. Potts Frankfurter and the Nazi Saboteurs 66 Michal R. Belknap Hugo Black: A Memorial Portrait 72 Elizabeth S. Black The Nomination of Charles Evans J-:lughes as Chief Justice 95 Merlo 1. Pusey De Minimis, or, Judicial Potpourri Toward 1987: Between War and Peace in 1782 101 /lVilliam F Swindler Slogans to Fit the Occasion 104 Barrett McGurn Copyright© 1982, by the Supreme Court Historical Society, 1511 K Street, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20005 The Supreme Court Historical Society BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Honorary Chairman Fred M. Vinson, Jr. Linwood Holton Chairman President Vice Presidents Frank Gilbert Kenneth Rush David Lloyd Kreeger Whitney North Seymour Alice L. O'Donnell Virginia Warren Daly, Secretary Peter A. Knowles, Treasurer Trustees Mrs. David Acheson Earl W. Kintner Ralph E. Becker Francis R. Kirkham Griffin B. Bell Sol M. Linowitz James J. Bierbower William Barnabas McHenry Mrs. Hugo L. Black Richard A. Moore Herbert Brownell David A. Morse Vincent C. Burke, Jr. Melvin M. Payne Gwendolyn Cafritz Merlo J. Pusey William T. Coleman, Jr. Harvey T. Reid Charles T. Duncan William P. Rogers Patricia Collins Dwinnell Fred Schwengel Paul A. Freund Bernard G. Segal Erwin N. Griswold William F. Swindler Lita Annenberg Hazen Obert C. Tanner Joseph H. Hennage J. Albert Woll Bruce E. Kiernat Gary J. Aichele Executive Director In Memoriam ELIZABETH HUGHES GOSSETT 1907-1981 This volume is dedicated to the memory of Elizabeth Hughes Gossett, a founding member of the Society, its first President, and later, a Chairman of its Board of'llustees. Her article on Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes published in the 1976 Year­ book revealed not only her deep love and respect for her distin­ guished father, bu t also her reverence for the Supreme Court and a keen understanding of its place in American life and history. Her special qualities of intellect, wisdom, and quiet yet irresisti­ ble leadership; her example of caring, of grace, and humanity, all combined to render her a dominant force for good and a noble inspiration for everyone whose life she touched. 6 My Father the ChiefJustice Earl Warren, Jr. (EdiJor's Note: Chief Justice Earl Warren pre­ would agree that no one could have finer parents. sided over the Supreme Court in what was prob­ And that to include my mother in the context of ably the most critical era of twentieth century this article is absolutely essential, for why else American history. His own Memoirsgive hints of would my father have said in the dedication of some of the stresses of the times, and Mrs. Fry's his memoirs: "To Nina, the best thing that ever summary of the taped interviews with some of his happened to me. " contemporaries, in the progress of his career to­ From the early days of our lives, my father ward the Court, whichfollows, captures the flavor was a prominent public figure-the most effec­ of some of the issues in which Warren the prose­ tive crime-busting District Attorney in the his­ cutor, attorney general and governor partici­ tory of the Nation, and Attorney General of the pated. In the present article one of his children­ same vein, a superb Governor of one of the Judge Earl Warren, Jr. of the Municipal Court of largest states in the Union, a candidate for Sacramento - balances this with a warm family Vice-President, a seeker of the Presidency itself, portJ:ait . ) then finally the Chief Justice of the United States. Yet, we were largely insulated from the As a preface to what follows, I must state that I effects of his career by both him and my mother, am simply one of the six children of my father who ran a household just as though he was en­ and am only expressing my own viewpoints. gaged in an occupation which was totally un­ However, I feel comfortable in doing so because political and uncontroversial . we are a very close family and am sure that most Ours were normal childhoods in the formative of my observations and comments would be con­ years, with no inkling of being "different," other curred in by the others. Nevertheless, I would than the knowledge that Dad held "important" not feel the least bit offended if I were to be con­ jobs. And even as to that, our knowledge of their tradicted in any respect by any of the others, for importance came almost entirely from others. each naturally has his or her own viewpoints Fortunately, the realization of his trials, disap­ which are entitled to equal weight. pointments, and successes became evident only As it is, I was asked to write this piece, and, after we had become teenagers-and then only for reasons of my own (and I believe my father's) to a limited extent. I have chosen to write it without any of the rest of I still cannot fully understand how my father the family's concurrence or revisions, or even and mother achieved this, except through the fact their knowledge that I was doing so. that we were treated the same as any non­ Also, I was assigned to discuss only personal political family by them and , in retrospect, the aspects of my father and the family, which I find fact that they somehow otherwise managed to to be a difficult task since all of us were relegated keep our family life insulated from my father's to living lives which were inextricably woven professional life . I have immense difficulty in into his public service. It is also a difficult task trying to determine how they did this, because of because we were so close and because at times all the public notoriety which accompanied his we individually lived thousands of tribulations achievements, yet they did, and we are all ex­ and elations which he probably felt even more tremely grateful. deeply. Each of us was allowed, in fact encouraged, to As a beginning, I am certain that all of us live an independent life, with friends of our own MY FATHER THE CHIEF JUSTICE 7 ~ ~ ____ l A jubilam Warren enjoys breakfast with his family after learning of his sizeable lead in the 1938 California AI/orney General's race, Pictured with the future AI/orney General and his wife are five of their six children: (from left to righJ) VlJ'ginia , Earl, Jr" Nino. , Elizabeth and Bobby, choosing, and to follow the patterns of develop­ of the" pcl'br man's" major points of entry into a ment which natura,lly ensued. There was abso­ new life - particularly during the Depression lutely no urging to confine ourselves in any way, and the advent of World War II . And since we nor even the slightest hint that we should con­ always attended public schools, the exposure to form to certain standards commensurate with his diverse cultures was intense indeed. public positions, As children, we therefore were This "separate life" aspect pertained to reli­ free to do anything we desired, as long as it was a gious activities as well. Each of us was free to moraJly acceptable course of conduct. Hence question and explore and then affiliate according each of us led a separate life - chose our own to our individual consciences and preferences.
Recommended publications
  • President Roosevelt and the Supreme Court Bill of 1937
    President Roosevelt and the Supreme Court bill of 1937 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Hoffman, Ralph Nicholas, 1930- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 09:02:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/319079 PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT AND THE SUPREME COURT BILL OF 1937 by Ralph Nicholas Hoffman, Jr. A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of History and Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Graduate College, University of Arizona 1954 This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the Library to be made avail­ able to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without spec­ ial permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other in­ stances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: TABLE.' OF.GOWTENTS Chapter / . Page Ic PHEYIOUS CHALLENGES TO THE JODlClMXo , V .
    [Show full text]
  • WHCA): Videotapes of Public Affairs, News, and Other Television Broadcasts, 1973-77
    Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library White House Communications Agency (WHCA): Videotapes of Public Affairs, News, and Other Television Broadcasts, 1973-77 WHCA selectively created, or acquired, videorecordings of news and public affairs broadcasts from the national networks CBS, NBC, and ABC; the public broadcast station WETA in Washington, DC; and various local station affiliates. Program examples include: news special reports, national presidential addresses and press conferences, local presidential events, guest interviews of administration officials, appearances of Ford family members, and the 1976 Republican Convention and Ford-Carter debates. In addition, WHCA created weekly compilation tapes of selected stories from network evening news programs. Click here for more details about the contents of the "Weekly News Summary" tapes All WHCA videorecordings are listed in the table below according to approximate original broadcast date. The last entries, however, are for compilation tapes of selected television appearances by Mrs. Ford, 1974-76. The tables are based on WHCA’s daily logs. “Tape Length” refers to the total recording time available, not actual broadcast duration. Copyright Notice: Although presidential addresses and very comparable public events are in the public domain, the broadcaster holds the rights to all of its own original content. This would include, for example, reporter commentaries and any supplemental information or images. Researchers may acquire copies of the videorecordings, but use of the copyrighted portions is restricted to private study and “fair use” in scholarship and research under copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code). Use the search capabilities of your PDF reader to locate specific names or keywords in the table below.
    [Show full text]
  • Downs, Maria” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 128, folder “Downs, Maria” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 128 of The Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford- Presidential Library THE WHITE: HOUSE WASHINGTON December 22, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR :MARIA DOWNS FROM: Connie Gerrard ( ~- '-./I..-" These are 'the press people Ron Nessen would like to have invited to the din...'ler in honor of Prime Minister Rabin in late January: Mr. and Mrs. Loyd Shearer Parade Magazine 140 North Hamilton Street Beverly Hills, California 90211 Phone: 213-472-1011 Mr. and Mrs. Herb Kaplow ABC Office: 1124 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D. C. Phone: 393-7700 Home: 211 Van Buren Street Falls Church, Virginia 22046 Phone: 532-2690 Mr. and Mr,~. Saul Kohler Newhouse Newspapers Office: 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Phone: 298-7080 Hoxne: 714 Kerwin Road Silver Spring, Maryland 20901 Phone: 593-7464 -2- - Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Judicial Civility
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 28 Number 2 Symposium on Civility and Judicial Ethics in the 1990s: Professionalism in the pp.583-646 Practice of Law Symposium on Civility and Judicial Ethics in the 1990s: Professionalism in the Practice of Law The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Judicial Civility Edward McGlynn Gaffney Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Edward McGlynn Gaffney Jr., The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Judicial Civility, 28 Val. U. L. Rev. 583 (1994). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol28/iss2/5 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Gaffney: The Importance of Dissent and the Imperative of Judicial Civility THE IMPORTANCE OF DISSENT AND THE IMPERATIVE OF JUDICIAL CIVILITY EDWARD McGLYNN GAFFNEY, JR.* A dissent in a court of last resort is an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day, when a later decision may possibly correct the errorinto which the dissentingjudge believes the court to have been betrayed... Independence does not mean cantankerousness and ajudge may be a strongjudge without being an impossibleperson. Nothing is more distressing on any bench than the exhibition of a captious, impatient, querulous spirit.' Charles Evans Hughes I. INTRODUCTION Charles Evans Hughes served as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from 1910 to 1916 and as Chief Justice of the United States from 1930 to 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Books & Special Collections Tarlton Law Library University Of
    Rare Books & Special Collections Tarlton Law Library University of Texas at Austin 727 E. 26th St., Austin, Texas 78705-3224 512/471-7263 SUPREME COURT NOMINATIONS RESEARCH FILES, 1823-1955, Bulk 1860-1939 Inventory Date printed: SUPREME COURT NOMINATIONS RESEARCH FILES Inventory Extent: 1.25 linear ft. (3 boxes). Frank, John P., 1917-2002- John P. Frank, a noted attorney and constitutional scholar, was born in 1917. He received his LL.B. at the University of Wisconsin, and his J.S.D. from Yale University. He was law clerk to Justice Hugo L. Black at the October, 1942 term, among other prominent positions. He taught law from 1946 to 1954 at Indiana and Yale Universities. He has authored 12 books on the Supreme Court, the Constitution and constitutional law. A senior partner with the Phoenix firm of Lewis and Roca, which he joined in 1954, Frank was lead counsel on the ground-breaking Miranda v. Arizona case, and served as counsel to Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings. While serving on the Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure, Frank led a group that worked on drafting revisions to Rule 11 attorney sanctions. Frank also served from 1960 to 1970 on the Advisory Committee of Civil Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Scope and Content: The collection consists of research into U.S. Supreme Court nominations of the 19th and 20th centuries, and includes 8 inches of printed materials and 7 microfilm reels (35mm), 1823-1939 (bulk 1860-1939), collected by Frank, for a research project concerning Supreme Court nominations.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait Paul R
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 43 | Number 4 Symposium: Maritime Personal Injury March 1983 Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait Paul R. Baier Louisiana State University Law Center Repository Citation Paul R. Baier, Edward Douglas White: Frame for a Portrait, 43 La. L. Rev. (1983) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol43/iss4/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. V ( TI DEDICATION OF PORTRAIT EDWARD DOUGLASS WHITE: FRAME FOR A PORTRAIT* Oration at the unveiling of the Rosenthal portrait of E. D. White, before the Louisiana Supreme Court, October 29, 1982. Paul R. Baier** Royal Street fluttered with flags, we are told, when they unveiled the statue of Edward Douglass White, in the heart of old New Orleans, in 1926. Confederate Veterans, still wearing the gray of '61, stood about the scaffolding. Above them rose Mr. Baker's great bronze statue of E. D. White, heroic in size, draped in the national flag. Somewhere in the crowd a band played old Southern airs, soft and sweet in the April sunshine. It was an impressive occasion, reported The Times-Picayune1 notable because so many venerable men and women had gathered to pay tribute to a man whose career brings honor to Louisiana and to the nation. Fifty years separate us from that occasion, sixty from White's death.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter I: the Supremacy of Equal Rights
    DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125 CHAPTER I: THE SUPREMACY OF EQUAL RIGHTS J. Morgan Kousser SOCIAL SCIENCE WORKING PAPER 620 March 1987 ABSTRACT The black and white abolitionist agitation of the school integ ration issue in Massachusetts from 1840 to 1855 gave us the fi rst school integ ration case filed in Ame rica, the fi rst state sup reme cou rt decision re po rted on the issue, and the fi rst state-wide law banning ra cial disc rimination in admission to educational institutions. Wh o favo red and who opposed school integ ration, and what arguments did each side make? We re the types of arguments that they offe re d diffe rent in diffe re nt fo ru ms? We re they diffe rent from 20th centu ry arguments? Wh y did the movement triumph, and why did it take so long to do so? Wh at light does the st ruggle th row on views on ra ce re lations held by membe rs of the antebellum black and white communities, on the cha racte r of the abolitionist movement, and on the development of legal doct rines about ra cial equality? Pe rhaps mo re gene rally, how should histo ri ans go about assessing the weight of diffe rent re asons that policymake rs adduced fo r thei r actions, and how flawed is a legal histo ry that confines itself to st rictly legal mate ri als? How can social scientific theo ry and statistical techniques be profitably applied to politico-legal histo ry? Pa rt of a la rge r project on the histo ry of cou rt cases and state and local provisions on ra cial disc rimination in schools, this pape r int roduces many of the main themes, issues, and methods to be employed in the re st of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Porcellian Club Centennial, 1791-1891
    nia LIBRARY UNIVERSITY W CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO NEW CLUB HOUSE PORCELLIAN CLUB CENTENNIAL 17911891 CAMBRIDGE printed at ttjr itttirnsiac press 1891 PREFATORY THE new building which, at the meeting held in Febru- ary, 1890, it was decided to erect has been completed, and is now occupied by the Club. During the period of con- struction, temporary quarters were secured at 414 Harvard Street. The new building stands upon the site of the old building which the Club had occupied since the year 1833. In order to celebrate in an appropriate manner the comple- tion of the work and the Centennial Anniversary of the Founding of the Porcellian Club, a committee, consisting of the Building Committee and the officers of the Club, was chosen. February 21, 1891, was selected as the date, and it was decided to have the Annual Meeting and certain Literary Exercises commemorative of the occasion precede the Dinner. The Committee has prepared this volume con- taining the Literary Exercises, a brief account of the Din- ner, and a catalogue of the members of the Club to date. A full account of the Annual Meeting and the Dinner may be found in the Club records. The thanks of the Committee and of the Club are due to Brothers Honorary Sargent, Isham, and Chapman for their contribution towards the success of the Exercises Literary ; also to Brother Honorary Hazeltine for his interest in pre- PREFATORY paring the plates for the memorial programme; also to Brother Honorary Painter for revising the Club Catalogue. GEO. B. SHATTUCK, '63, F. R. APPLETON, '75, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Owen J. Roberts on 1937
    JUSTICE OWEN J. ROBERTS ON 1937 Edward L. Carter & Edward E. Adams† HE MOTIVATIONS FOR Supreme Court Justice Owen J. Roberts’ so-called “switch in time that saved nine” in 1937 remain largely obscured. For much of the past 75 years, judges, lawyers, and scholars have discussed – in- cluding recently in this journal1 – why Roberts would vote to up- T 2 hold minimum-wage legislation in March 1937 when he had voted to invalidate similar legislation in June 1936.3 Because President Franklin D. Roosevelt unveiled his court-packing plan on February 5, 1937, externalists have ascribed political motivations to Roberts and the Court.4 Internalists, meanwhile, have pointed to legal rea- sons for the switch.5 With the exception, however, of a memoran- dum Roberts gave to Justice Felix Frankfurter in 1945 that was first published a decade later,6 Roberts’ own voice has been largely miss- ing from the discussion. † Ed Carter is an Associate Professor of Communications and Ed Adams is a Professor of Communications at Brigham Young University. Copyright © 2012 Edward L. Carter and Edward E. Adams. 1 Barry Cushman, The Hughes-Roberts Visit, 15 GREEN BAG 2D 125 (2012). 2 West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937). 3 Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo, 298 U.S. 587 (1936). 4 See Laura Kalman, The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the New Deal, 110 AM. HIST. REV. 1052 (2005) (compiling articles). 5 Id. (same). 6 Felix Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Roberts, 104 U. PA. L. REV. 311 (1955). 15 GREEN BAG 2D 375 Edward L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of the United States
    The Supreme Court of the United States Hearings and Reports on the Successful and Unsuccessful Nominations Now Includes the Kavanaugh and Preliminary Barrett Volumes! This online set contains all existing Senate documents for 1916 to date, as a result of the hearings and subsequent hearings on Supreme Court nominations� Included in the volumes are hearings never before made public! The series began with three volumes devoted to the controversial confirmation of Louis Brandeis, the first nominee subject to public hearings. The most recent complete volumes cover Justice Kavanaugh. After two years, the Judiciary Committee had finally released Kavanaugh’s nomination hearings, so we’ve been able to complete the online volumes� The material generated by Kavanaugh’s nomination was so voluminous that it takes up 8 volumes� The definitive documentary history of the nominations and confirmation process, this ongoing series covers both successful and unsuccessful nominations� As a measure of its importance, it is now consulted by staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee as nominees are considered� Check your holdings and complete your print set! Volume 27 (1 volume) 2021 Amy Coney Barrett �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Online Only Volume 26 (8 volumes) - 2021 Brett Kavanaugh ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Online Only Volume 25 (2 books) - 2018 Neil M� Gorsuch ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������$380�00
    [Show full text]
  • Abington School District V. Schempp 1 Ableman V. Booth 1 Abortion 2
    TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Bill of Rights 66 Birth Control and Contraception 71 Abington School District v. Schempp 1 Hugo L. Black 73 Ableman v. Booth 1 Harry A. Blackmun 75 Abortion 2 John Blair, Jr. 77 Adamson v. California 8 Samuel Blatchford 78 Adarand Constructors v. Peña 8 Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell 79 Adkins v. Children’s Hospital 10 Bob Jones University v. United States 80 Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl 13 Boerne v. Flores 81 Advisory Opinions 15 Bolling v. Sharpe 81 Affirmative Action 15 Bond v. United States 82 Afroyim v. Rusk 21 Boumediene v. Bush 83 Age Discrimination 22 Bowers v. Hardwick 84 Samuel A. Alito, Jr. 24 Boyd v. United States 86 Allgeyer v. Louisiana 26 Boy Scouts of America v. Dale 86 Americans with Disabilities Act 27 Joseph P. Bradley 87 Antitrust Law 29 Bradwell v. Illinois 89 Appellate Jurisdiction 33 Louis D. Brandeis 90 Argersinger v. Hamlin 36 Brandenburg v. Ohio 92 Arizona v. United States 36 William J. Brennan, Jr. 92 Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing David J. Brewer 96 Development Corporation 37 Stephen G. Breyer 97 Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 38 Briefs 99 Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority 38 Bronson v. Kinzie 101 Assembly and Association, Freedom of 39 Henry B. Brown 101 Arizona v. Gant 42 Brown v. Board of Education 102 Atkins v. Virginia 43 Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association 104 Automobile Searches 45 Brown v. Maryland 106 Brown v. Mississippi 106 Bad Tendency Test 46 Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company 107 Bail 47 Buchanan v.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Textualists: a Critical Comparison of Justices Black and Scalia Michael J
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 1994 A Tale of Two Textualists: A Critical Comparison of Justices Black and Scalia Michael J. Gerhardt Repository Citation Gerhardt, Michael J., "A Tale of Two Textualists: A Critical Comparison of Justices Black and Scalia" (1994). Faculty Publications. 990. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/990 Copyright c 1994 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs ARTICLES A TALE OF TWO TEXTUALISTS: A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF JUSTICES BLACK AND SCALIA MICHAEL J. GERHARDT* The idea that Justices Hugo Black and Antonin Scalia have anything in common jurisprudentially is counterintuitive. Justice Black is associated with the progressive social and economic legislation symbolized by the New Deal and with judicial activism in protecting the poor and disen­ franchised.1 He is beloved by many liberals as a champion of individual rights, especially freedom of speech and of the press. In contrast, Justice Scalia is revered by conservatives as a true believer-combating the rising tide of liberalism, big government, and judicial activism-set on restoring traditional notions of federalism and judicial restraint.2 Any effort to liken these two Justices makes both liberals and conservatives recoil. * Professor of Law, Marshall-Wythe School of Law, The College of William and Mary. B.A. Yale University; M.Sc. London School of Economics; J.D. University of Chicago. I am grateful for the encouragement and helpful comments on earlier drafts I received from Marc Arkin, Erwin Chemerinsky, George Cochran, Neal Devins, Jill Fisch, Tracy Higgins, Michael Herz, Sandy Levinson, Chip Lupu, Tracey Maclin, John McGinnis, Peter Shane, Bill Treanor, Steve Wermiel, and Ron Wright.
    [Show full text]